This article is available to subscribers. Subscribe now. Already have an account? Sign in

Original ArticleFree Preview

Albuterol–Budesonide Fixed-Dose Combination Rescue Inhaler for Asthma

List of authors.
  • Alberto Papi, M.D.,
  • Bradley E. Chipps, M.D.,
  • Richard Beasley, D.Sc.,
  • Reynold A. Panettieri, Jr., M.D.,
  • Elliot Israel, M.D.,
  • Mark Cooper, M.Sc.,
  • Lynn Dunsire, M.Sc.,
  • Allison Jeynes-Ellis, M.D.,
  • Eva Johnsson, M.D.,
  • Robert Rees, Ph.D.,
  • Christy Cappelletti, Pharm.D.,
  • and Frank C. Albers, M.D.

Abstract

Background

As asthma symptoms worsen, patients typically rely on short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) rescue therapy, but SABAs do not address worsening inflammation, which leaves patients at risk for severe asthma exacerbations. The use of a fixed-dose combination of albuterol and budesonide, as compared with albuterol alone, as rescue medication might reduce the risk of severe asthma exacerbation.

Methods

Download a PDF of the Research Summary.

We conducted a multinational, phase 3, double-blind, randomized, event-driven trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of albuterol–budesonide, as compared with albuterol alone, as rescue medication in patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma who were receiving inhaled glucocorticoid-containing maintenance therapies, which were continued throughout the trial. Adults and adolescents (≥12 years of age) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three trial groups: a fixed-dose combination of 180 μg of albuterol and 160 μg of budesonide (with each dose consisting of two actuations of 90 μg and 80 μg, respectively [the higher-dose combination group]), a fixed-dose combination of 180 μg of albuterol and 80 μg of budesonide (with each dose consisting of two actuations of 90 μg and 40 μg, respectively [the lower-dose combination group]), or 180 μg of albuterol (with each dose consisting of two actuations of 90 μg [the albuterol-alone group]). Children 4 to 11 years of age were randomly assigned to only the lower-dose combination group or the albuterol-alone group. The primary efficacy end point was the first event of severe asthma exacerbation in a time-to-event analysis, which was performed in the intention-to-treat population.

Results

A total of 3132 patients underwent randomization, among whom 97% were 12 years of age or older. The risk of severe asthma exacerbation was significantly lower, by 26%, in the higher-dose combination group than in the albuterol-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.89; P=0.001). The hazard ratio in the lower-dose combination group, as compared with the albuterol-alone group, was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00; P=0.052). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the three trial groups.

Conclusions

The risk of severe asthma exacerbation was significantly lower with as-needed use of a fixed-dose combination of 180 μg of albuterol and 160 μg of budesonide than with as-needed use of albuterol alone among patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma who were receiving a wide range of inhaled glucocorticoid-containing maintenance therapies. (Funded by Avillion; MANDALA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03769090.)

Digital Object ThumbnailQUICK TAKE VIDEO SUMMARY
Albuterol–Budesonide Rescue Inhaler in Asthma
 02:08

Continue reading this article

Select an option below:

Create your account to get 2 free subscriber-only articles each month.

Get Free Access Now Subscribe For Full Access

Already have an account?

Sign In

Print subscriber?

Activate your online access.

Funding and Disclosures

Supported by Avillion.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

Drs. Papi and Chipps contributed equally to this article.

This article was published on May 15, 2022, at NEJM.org.

A data sharing statement provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

We thank the trial patients and their families; the investigators and staff at the trial sites; the team at Syneos Health and Phastar; the members of the independent data and safety monitoring committee; the full clinical team at Avillion and AstraZeneca; and Marco E. Favretto and Samantha Blakemore at inScience Communications, Springer Healthcare, United Kingdom, for providing medical writing support (funded by AstraZeneca).

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Ferrara Medical School, Ferrara, Italy (A.P.); the Capital Allergy and Respiratory Disease Center, Sacramento, CA (B.E.C.); the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Capital and Coast District Health Board, and Victoria University Wellington — all in Wellington, New Zealand (R.B.); Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Child Health Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick (R.A.P.); Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (E.I.); BioPharmaceuticals Research and Development, AstraZeneca, Cambridge (M.C., L.D.), and Avillion, London (A.J.-E., R.R.) — both in the United Kingdom; BioPharmaceuticals Research and Development, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (E.J.); BioPharmaceuticals Research and Development, AstraZeneca, Durham, NC (C.C.); and Avillion, Northbrook, IL (F.C.A.).

Dr. Papi can be contacted at or at the University of Ferrara Medical School, Via Aldo Moro, 8, 44141, Ferrara, Italy.

Print Subscriber? Activate your online access.