Skip to main content
Device Global Header

Subscribe
or Renew

Advanced Search

Original ArticleBrief Report

Disputed Maternity Leading to Identification of Tetragametic Chimerism

List of authors.
  • Neng Yu, M.D.,
  • Margot S. Kruskall, M.D.,
  • Juan J. Yunis, M.D.,
  • Joan H.M. Knoll, Ph.D.,
  • Lynne Uhl, M.D.,
  • Sharon Alosco, M.T.,
  • Marina Ohashi,
  • Olga Clavijo,
  • Zaheed Husain, Ph.D.,
  • Emilio J. Yunis, M.D.,
  • Jorge J. Yunis, M.D.,
  • and Edmond J. Yunis, M.D.

Introduction

Chimerism, the presence of two genetically distinct cell lines in an organism, either is acquired through the infusion of allogeneic hematopoietic cells during transplantation1 or transfusion2 or is inherited. In fraternal twins, chimerism occurs by means of blood-vessel anastomoses. A less common cause of congenital chimerism — so-called tetragametic chimerism — occurs through the fertilization of two ova by two spermatozoa, followed by the fusion of the zygotes and the development of an organism with intermingled cell lines.3 Examples have been found in mice4 and other mammalian species,5-7 including humans.8-17 Affected persons are identified by the finding of two populations of red cells9 or ambiguous genitalia and hermaphroditism,11,15,16 alone or in combination; such persons sometimes also have patchy skin or eye pigmentation.17

We describe a phenotypically normal woman in whom tetragametic chimerism was unexpectedly identified after histocompatibility testing of family members suggested that she was not the biologic mother of two of her three children.

Case Report

Figure 1. Figure 1. Pedigree and Results of HLA Haplotyping of Blood Samples from the Patient and Her Family (Panel A) and of the Samples of Blood, Hair Follicle, and Thyroid from the Patient (Panel B).

The proband's father was deceased, and his haplotypes, shown in parentheses in Panel A, were deduced from studies of the other family members. Haplotype 1 was HLA-A*66,B*41,DRB1*04,DQB1*0301; haplotype 2 was HLA-A*25,B*08,DRB1*08,DQB1*04; haplotype 3 was HLA-A*02,B*40,DRB1*04,DQB1*0301; haplotype 4 was HLA-A*11,B*27,DRB1*0101,DQB1*0501; haplotype 5 was HLA-A*03,B*35,DRB1*0101,DQB1*0501; and haplotype 6 was HLA-A*24,B*15,DRB1*04,DQB1*0302. In Panel B, polymerase chain reaction and sequence-specific oligonucleotide-probe hybridization were used for haplotyping. The probe sequences included 5'GAGACGGCCCATGAGGCG3' in the case of HLA-A*66, 5'TATTGGGACGGGGAGACA3' in the case of HLA-A*02, 5'GAGGTATTTCGACACCGCC3' in the case of HLA-B*08, and 5'ATCTGCAAGGCCAAGGCA3' in the case of HLA-B*27. Only haplotypes 1 and 3 were evident in the blood sample. On the basis of a visual analysis of the signal strength, hair-follicle samples showed a preponderance of DNA associated with haplotypes 1 and 3 and a smaller amount of DNA associated with haplotypes 2 and 4. In contrast, thyroid-tissue samples had a preponderance of haplotypes 2 and 4 and smaller amounts of haplotypes 1 and 3.

A 52-year-old woman had renal failure as a result of focal sclerosing glomerulonephritis. In preparation for kidney transplantation, the patient and her immediate family underwent histocompatibility testing (Figure 1A). The results suggested that the patient could not be the biologic mother of two of her three sons, who had her husband's HLA haplotype and a unique collection of HLA determinants, instead of one of the expected maternal haplotypes (Figure 1).

On examination, she was a phenotypically normal female without abnormal pigmentation of the skin or eyes. Her birth had been unremarkable. Additional laboratory investigations were performed, with the patient's written informed consent.

Methods

Tissue Collection

Samples of buccal mucosa, hair follicles, and skin were obtained; samples of formalin-fixed thyroid tissue were obtained from a previously excised benign thyroid nodule; and bladder tissue was obtained during cystoscopy. Epidermal keratinocytes and fibroblasts were isolated from bladder-biopsy specimens, and skin-fibroblast cultures were also established, as described previously.18

Blood Grouping and HLA Studies

Tube-based serologic testing was used to type red cells for ABO and other blood-group antigens.19 Blood samples were used for the serologic and molecular typing of HLA class I markers; class II typing was performed with the use of molecular methods alone. Tissue samples, either without further modification or after culture, in the case of bladder and skin specimens, were used to extract DNA (QIAAMP Tissue Kit, Qiagen) for molecular typing of HLA class I and class II markers. Molecular typing was performed with the use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), sequence-specific primer amplification,20,21 and published primer sequences22 and with the use of PCR and sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes (HLA Quick-Type kits, Lifecodes), according to previously described amplification conditions.23 To increase the sensitivity of haplotype detection, we also used nested PCR amplification: the initial round of amplification consisted of 30 cycles; 10 μl of the amplification product was then removed and used as a template for another 30 cycles.24 Haplotypes were assigned on the basis of allele data obtained from studies of the patient and her family.

Cytogenetic Analysis

Chromosomes were prepared from cultured skin fibroblasts and phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocytes in prometaphase and metaphase and stained according to standard protocols.25,26 To rule out low-level trisomy or tetrasomy, in situ hybridization of cells in interphase was performed as previously described, with the use of a pericentromeric sequence for chromosome 6 (D6Z1).27

Determination of Sex Chromosomes

The amelogenin gene, present on both X and Y chromosomes, was amplified by PCR (GenePrint STR systems, Promega) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. XX chromosomes have a single 212-bp fragment; XY chromosomes have both 212-bp and 218-bp fragments.

Short Tandem-Repeat Microsatellite Markers

We analyzed the number of repeats of small (dinucleotide, trinucleotide, or tetranucleotide) motifs in a given region of a chromosome to identify genetic polymorphisms. We studied 22 short tandem repeats on 16 autosomes and the X chromosome. We used commercially available kits for the following loci: TPOX, D3S1358, FGA, D8S1179, THO1, vWA, Penta E, D18S51, and D21S11 (Powerplex 2.1 GenePrint STR systems, Promega); D16S539, D7S820, D13S317, and D5S818 (GammaStar, GenePrint STR systems); FGA, D7S820, D1S533, and D9S304 (Multiplex II, Lifecodes); and D12S1090, D3S1744, and D18S849 (Multiplex I, Lifecodes).28-30 Alleles were designated according to the recommendations of the DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics; size ladders were provided by the various manufacturers.31 We also amplified DNA using radioactively end-labeled primers for D2S160, D2S2216, D20S195, and DXS1073 (GIBCO-BRL, Life Technologies). PCR products were separated by polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis and identified by autoradiography.32

Mixed-Lymphocyte Culture and Cell-Mediated Lysis

The mixed-lymphocyte culture detects mismatched major-histocompatibility-complex (MHC) class II antigens (HLA-DR and DQ alleles) on the surface of a person's irradiated lymphocytes and monocytes (stimulator cells) by using as an end point the degree of proliferation of another person's CD4 (responder) cells.33 In this study, the proband was the source of the responder cells, and stimulator cells were obtained from family members and from four normal subjects used as controls. Stimulator and responder cells were cocultured for six days, the wells were labeled with tritiated thymidine, and the degree of proliferation of CD4 cells was determined. The result was expressed as the relative response, defined as the ratio of thymidine uptake by the responder cells in response to exposure to the irradiated stimulator cells, as compared with the exposure to control cells.

Cell-mediated lysis is used to assess the capacity of CD8 lymphocytes to kill cells that are mismatched for MHC class I antigens (HLA-A, B, and C alleles).33 In this procedure, cells from the proband were cultured with irradiated target cells to create primed effector cells. Chromium-51–labeled target cells from various sources were then added to the effector cells at various ratios of effector to target cells. After a four-hour incubation, the supernatants were removed and analyzed. The result was expressed as the percentage of specific cytotoxicity, defined as the amount of chromium-51 released in comparison to the total cell-associated chromium-51.

Results

Blood Typing

The patient's red cells were group A, Rh-positive; antibody against group B (agglutination titer, 3+) was present in her plasma. Her husband's red cells were blood group O, and the two sons of questionable maternity were group A and group O. Her red-cell phenotype was R1r(Cde/cde),K–,Fy(a+b+), Le(a–b+),P1–,M+N+S+s+, and there was no evidence of two distinct cell populations.

HLA Studies

Haplotyping showed that one of the patient's brothers had a haplotype of HLA-A*25,B*08,DRD1*08,DQB1*04, which was presumably paternally inherited. PCR and sequence-specific oligonucleotide-probe hybridization showed four haplotypes in samples of skin, thyroid, bladder epithelial cells, bladder fibroblasts, buccal mucosa, and hair-follicle cells from the patient but only two haplotypes in her blood. In tissues with four haplotypes, one of two pairs always predominated, either haplotype 1 and haplotype 3 or haplotype 2 and haplotype 4 (Figure 1B).

Cytogenetic Analysis

Cytogenetic analysis of both blood and cultured skin fibroblasts from the patient demonstrated a normal karyotype of 46,XX. An analysis in which the amelogenin gene was used as a marker showed a female sex chromosome complement. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, we examined 200 nuclei to determine the number of copies of chromosome 6 in each nucleus. All 200 had a normal diploid complement.

Short Tandem-Repeat Microsatellite Markers

Table 1. Table 1. Microsatellite Analysis of DNA from Various Tissues from the Patient and of Blood from Family Members.

Microsatellite analysis of DNA from various tissues from the patient and her family identified more than two alleles at one or more loci in 14 of the 17 chromosomes from the patient that were studied (Table 1).

Mixed-Lymphocyte Culture and Cell-Mediated Lysis

Figure 2. Figure 2. Mixed-Lymphocyte Cultures of Cells from the Patient, Her Two Brothers, and Her Mother and Pooled Cells from Unrelated Control Subjects.

Lymphocyte proliferation is reported as a relative response and represents the uptake of tritiated thymidine by responder cells in response to an irradiated population of stimulator lymphocytes, as compared with the uptake of thymidine in response to irradiated control lymphocytes.

Figure 3. Figure 3. Cell-Mediated Lysis.

Effector cells consisted of primed lymphocytes from the patient, and target cells consisted of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated, irradiated 51Cr-labeled lymphocytes from the patient (as an autologous negative control), her HLA-identical brother (Brother 1), her haploidentical brother (Brother 2), her haploidentical mother, and four unrelated controls. In Panel A, four different effector:target ratios were evaluated (50:1, 25:1, 12.5:1, and 6.25:1), and the percentage of 51Cr released in relation to total amount of cell-associated 51Cr was calculated. At an effector:target ratio of 50:1, the patient's cells were unable to kill cells from her HLA-identical brother, her HLA-haploidentical brother, or her mother (Panel B), whereas cells from her HLA-identical sibling B1 (Brother 1) were able to lyse cells from both his mother and his brother (Panel C).

In the mixed-lymphocyte culture, the patient's lymphocytes had no proliferative activity against cells from her HLA-identical brother (Brother 1, who had haplotypes 1 and 3), her haploidentical brother (Brother 2, who had haplotypes 2 and 3), or her haploidentical mother (haplotypes 3 and 4). However, the patient's lymphocytes responded appropriately to lymphocytes from unrelated control subjects (Figure 2). Her HLA-identical brother had normal proliferative responses to all cells except those from the patient, and her haploidentical brother and mother had proliferative responses to cells from all family members and the control subjects. In studies of cell-mediated lysis, the patient's cells were unable to kill the cells from her brothers or mother, regardless of the effector:target ratio used (Figure 3A and Figure 3B), but they did lyse lymphocytes from the four unrelated controls. Cells from her HLA-identical brother lysed cells from both his brother and his mother (Figure 3C).

Discussion

Figure 4. Figure 4. Proposed Derivation of Various Tissues in the Patient.

The findings were based on the results of polymerase-chain-reaction analysis. Both cell lines are represented to some extent in all tissues except blood.

This case represents an unusual example of tetragametic chimerism in a phenotypically normal, fertile XX/XX female who had no evidence of chimerism in peripheral blood. Figure 4 outlines the probable cause of this chimerism: separately fertilized XX zygotes, one with HLA haplotypes 1 and 3 and the other with haplotypes 2 and 4, are thought to have fused early in development. The distribution of cell lines varied in individual tissues, except in blood, which appeared to be derived from only one cell line, bearing HLA haplotypes 1 and 3. It is highly unlikely that the levels of the second cell line were below the limits of detection of our assays; we used sensitive techniques and multiple informative probes, which we have shown can identify as few as 1 in 100,000 cells in experimental mixes of two cell populations (unpublished data). Because of the single cell line in our patient's blood, blood-based studies of blood groups,14 molecular HLA typing,34 and DNA polymorphism analysis,10 which have all been used to identify chimeras, were not informative.

We are aware of only two other possible cases of human tetragametic chimeras with single cell lines in blood. In one case, discrepancies in the blood type between a woman and her children suggested that she was not the biologic mother.35 As in our patient, the children's nonpaternal haplotype was identified in maternal grandparents. However, the authors estimated that they would not have been able to detect a population of cells that was less than 0.5 percent of peripheral-blood cells.36 In another patient, a phenotypically normal man whose red cells were blood group B, chimerism was detected because of a surprisingly weak titer of antibody against group A and small amounts of group A substance on his red cells. The patient proved to be an XX/XY chimera with only XY lymphocytes in his blood. The XY line produced group B red cells; the XX line encoded a group A glycosyl transferase. The activity of this enzyme in nonhematopoietic XX tissues resulted in group A substance that was passively adsorbed by the patient's XY group B red cells.9

In a mouse model of tetragametic chimerism, in which blastomeres from two embryos were cocultured to form a chimera, 12 of 34 such mice had only one red-cell population in the blood even though they had two cell lines in other tissues.4 This finding could be consistent with the presence of a single cell line of clonal origin beginning early in development.37 Alternatively, a selective advantage could have caused one clone to be selected early in life. The latter possibility is supported by the finding, in a study of tetragametic rams, that one of the two red-cell lines completely disappeared over a period of five years in two of four chimeric animals.5

Because of the apparent rarity of tetragametic chimerism and the importance of the use of molecular techniques to confirm its presence, this condition may be underdiagnosed. Furthermore, if a single cell line predominates in the blood, the chimeric state may not be detected unless family studies are undertaken. Even then, the findings may be misinterpreted as ruling out maternity or paternity. Molecular studies of other tissues for chimerism should be considered in such cases. Furthermore, the need to consider this diagnosis may be increasingly relevant: in vitro fertilization is associated with a 33-fold increase in twinning16 and an increased incidence of tetragametic chimerism, possibly because the embryos are in close contact and fuse before they are implanted16 or because of double fertilization of an ovum with two nuclei.38,39

Finally, the tetragametic state has important implications for organ or stem-cell transplantation. Chimeras typically have immunologic tolerance to both cell lines. Even though our patient had only one cell line in her blood, her T lymphocytes did not respond to cells from family members with any combination of the four familial HLA haplotypes. These results are consistent with those of studies of tetragametic mice with single red-cell populations, which also demonstrated tolerance to skin grafts from parental strains.4 Thus, for a tetragametic human, a wider array of relatives (including, in our patient, all her children) and other persons may be eligible to be organ donors.

Funding and Disclosures

Supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL-59838 and HL-29583), by the American Red Cross Blood Services, New England Region, and by Servicios Medicos Yunis Turbay, Bogota, Colombia.

Author Affiliations

From the American Red Cross Blood Services, New England Region, Dedham, Mass. (N.Y., S.A., M.O.); Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston (M.S.K., J.H.M.K., L.U.); Servicios Medicos Yunis Turbay, Bogota, Colombia (Juan J. Yunis, Emilio J. Yunis); Departamento de Patología, Facultad de Medicina e Instituto de Genética, Universidad Nacional, Bogota, Colombia (Juan J. Yunis); Dana–Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston (O.C., Z.H., Edmond J. Yunis); and Miami (Jorge J. Yunis).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Kruskall at the Division of Laboratory and Transfusion Medicine, Yamins 309, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215, or at .

References (39)

  1. 1. Starzl TE, Demetris AJ. Transplantation tolerance, microchimerism, and the two-way paradigm. Theor Med Bioeth 1998;19:441-455

  2. 2. Kruskall MS, Lee T-H, Assmann SF, et al. Survival of transfused donor white cells in HIV-infected recipients. Blood 2001;98:272-279

  3. 3. Tippett P. Blood group chimeras: a review. Vox Sang 1983;44:333-359

  4. 4. Mintz B, Palm J. Gene control of hematopoiesis. I. Erythrocyte mosaicism and permanent immunological tolerance in allophenic mice. J Exp Med 1969;129:1013-1027

  5. 5. Tucker EM, Dain AR, Moor RM. Sex chromosome chimaerism and the transmission of blood group genes by tetraparental rams. J Reprod Med 1978;54:77-83

  6. 6. Sumantri C, Boediono A, Ooe M, Saha S, Suzuki T. Fertility of sperm from a tetraparental chimeric bull. Anim Reprod Sci 1997;46:35-45

  7. 7. Bordenave GR, Babinet C. Tetraparental rabbits chimeric for their lymphoid system. I. Allotype expression. Mol Immunol 1984;21:353-361

  8. 8. Schoenle E, Schmid W, Schinzel A, et al. 46,XX/46,XY chimerism in a phenotypically normal man. Hum Genet 1983;64:86-89

  9. 9. Watkins WM, Yates AD, Greenwell P, et al. A human dispermic chimaera first suspected from analyses of the blood group gene-specified glycosyltransferases. J Immunogenet 1981;8:113-128

  10. 10. Strain L, Warner JP, Johnston T, Bonthron DT. A human parthenogenetic chimaera. Nat Genet 1995;11:164-169

  11. 11. Green AJ, Barton DE, Jenks P, Pearson J, Yates JRW. Chimaerism shown by cytogenetics and DNA polymorphism analysis. J Med Genet 1994;31:816-817

  12. 12. Verp MS, Harrison HH, Ober C, et al. Chimerism as the etiology of a 46,XX/46,XY fertile true hermaphrodite. Fertil Steril 1992;57:346-349

  13. 13. Bromilow IM, Duguid J. The Liverpool chimera. Vox Sang 1989;57:147-149

  14. 14. Uehara S, Nata M, Nagae M, Sagisaka K, Okamura K, Yajima A. Molecular biologic analyses of tetragametic chimerism in a true hermaphrodite with 46,XX/46,XY. Fertil Steril 1995;63:189-192

  15. 15. Repas-Humpe LM, Humpe A, Lynen R, et al. A dispermic chimerism in a 2-year-old Caucasian boy. Ann Hematol 1999;78:431-434

  16. 16. Strain L, Dean JCS, Hamilton MPR, Bonthron DT. A true hermaphrodite chimera resulting from embryo amalgamation after in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 1998;338:166-169

  17. 17. Sybert VP. Hypomelanosis of Ito: a description, not a diagnosis. J Invest Dermatol 1994;103:Suppl:141S-143S

  18. 18. Firestone WM, FitzGerald GB, Wick MM. A comparison of the effects of antitumor agents upon normal human epidermal keratinocytes and human squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol 1990;94:657-661

  19. 19. Vengelen-Tyler V. Technical manual. 13th ed. Bethesda, Md.: American Association of Blood Banks, 1999.

  20. 20. Yu N, Ohashi M, Alosco S, et al. Accurate typing of HLA-A antigens and analysis of serological deficiencies. Tissue Antigens 1997;50:380-386[Erratum, Tissue Antigens 1998;52:302.]

  21. 21. Sadler AM, Petronzelli F, Krausa P, et al. Low-resolution DNA typing for HLA-B using sequence-specific primers in allele- or group-specific ARMS/PCR. Tissue Antigens 1994;44:148-154

  22. 22. Bunce M, O'Neill CM, Barnardo MC, et al. Phototyping: comprehensive DNA typing for HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3, DRB4, DRB5 & DQB1 by PCR with 144 primer mixes utilizing sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). Tissue Antigens 1995;46:355-367

  23. 23. Cao K, Chopek M, Fernandez-Vina MA. High and intermediate resolution DNA typing systems for class I HLA-A, B, C genes by hybridization with sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes (SSOP). Rev Immunogenet 1999;1:177-208

  24. 24. Thompson JD, Brodsky I, Yunis JJ. Molecular quantification of residual disease in chronic myelogenous leukemia after bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1992;79:1629-1635

  25. 25. Seabright M. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 1971;2:971-972

  26. 26. Yunis JJ. High resolution of human chromosomes. Science 1976;191:1268-1270

  27. 27. Knoll JHM, Lichter P. In situ hybridization to metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei. In: Dracopoli NC, Haines JL, Korf BR, et al., eds. Current protocols in human genetics. Vol. 1. New York: John Wiley, 1994:4.3.1–4.3.28.

  28. 28. Yunis JJ, Garcia O, Baena A, Arboleda G, Uriarte I, Yunis E. Population frequency for the short tandem repeat loci D18S849, D3S1744, and D12S1090 in Caucasian-Mestizo and African descent populations of Colombia. J Forensic Sci 2000;45:429-431

  29. 29. Yunis JJ, Garcia O, Uriarte I, Yunis EJ. Population data on 6 short tandem repeat loci in a sample of Caucasian-Mestizos from Colombia. Int J Legal Med 2000;113:175-178

  30. 30. Yunis JJ, Garcia O, Uriarte I, Yunis EJ. Population data on D16S539, D7S820, D13S317, LPL, F13B and D1S80 loci in a sample of Caucasian-Mestizos from Colombia. Forensic Sci Int 2001;115:117-118

  31. 31. DNA recommendations -- 1994 report concerning further recommendations of the DNA Commission of the ISFH regarding PCR-based polymorphisms in STR (short tandem repeat) systems. Vox Sang 1995;69:70-71

  32. 32. Albright LM, Slatko BE. Denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In: Dracopoli NC, Haines JL, Korf BR, et al., eds. Current protocols in human genetics. Vol. 1. New York: John Wiley, 1994:A.3F.1–A.3F.4.

  33. 33. Alexander SI, Younes SB, Yunis JJ, et al. Cell-mediated cytotoxicity: a predictor of chronic rejection in pediatric HLA haploidentical renal transplants. Transplantation 1997;63:1756-1761[Erratum, Transplantation 1998;65:318.]

  34. 34. Dib C, Faure S, Fizames C, et al. A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5,264 microsatellites. Nature 1996;380:152-154

  35. 35. Mayr WR, Pausch V, Schnedl W. Human chimaera detectable only by investigation of her progeny. Lancet 1979;277:210-211

  36. 36. Mayr WR. Human chimerism. Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol 1981;24:19-26

  37. 37. Krause DS, Theise ND, Collector MI, et al. Multi-organ, multi-lineage engraftment by a single bone marrow-derived stem cell. Cell 2001;105:369-377

  38. 38. Zeilmaker GH, Alberda AT, van Gent I. Fertilization and cleavage of oocytes from a binovular human ovarian follicle: a possible cause of dizygotic twinning and chimerism. Fertil Steril 1983;40:841-843

  39. 39. Ben-Rafael Z, Mastroianni L Jr, Kopf GS. In vitro fertilization and cleavage of a single egg from a binovular follicle containing two individual eggs surrounded by a single zona pellucida. Fertil Steril 1987;47:707-709

Citing Articles (79)

    Figures/Media

    1. Figure 1. Pedigree and Results of HLA Haplotyping of Blood Samples from the Patient and Her Family (Panel A) and of the Samples of Blood, Hair Follicle, and Thyroid from the Patient (Panel B).
      Figure 1. Pedigree and Results of HLA Haplotyping of Blood Samples from the Patient and Her Family (Panel A) and of the Samples of Blood, Hair Follicle, and Thyroid from the Patient (Panel B).

      The proband's father was deceased, and his haplotypes, shown in parentheses in Panel A, were deduced from studies of the other family members. Haplotype 1 was HLA-A*66,B*41,DRB1*04,DQB1*0301; haplotype 2 was HLA-A*25,B*08,DRB1*08,DQB1*04; haplotype 3 was HLA-A*02,B*40,DRB1*04,DQB1*0301; haplotype 4 was HLA-A*11,B*27,DRB1*0101,DQB1*0501; haplotype 5 was HLA-A*03,B*35,DRB1*0101,DQB1*0501; and haplotype 6 was HLA-A*24,B*15,DRB1*04,DQB1*0302. In Panel B, polymerase chain reaction and sequence-specific oligonucleotide-probe hybridization were used for haplotyping. The probe sequences included 5'GAGACGGCCCATGAGGCG3' in the case of HLA-A*66, 5'TATTGGGACGGGGAGACA3' in the case of HLA-A*02, 5'GAGGTATTTCGACACCGCC3' in the case of HLA-B*08, and 5'ATCTGCAAGGCCAAGGCA3' in the case of HLA-B*27. Only haplotypes 1 and 3 were evident in the blood sample. On the basis of a visual analysis of the signal strength, hair-follicle samples showed a preponderance of DNA associated with haplotypes 1 and 3 and a smaller amount of DNA associated with haplotypes 2 and 4. In contrast, thyroid-tissue samples had a preponderance of haplotypes 2 and 4 and smaller amounts of haplotypes 1 and 3.

    2. Table 1. Microsatellite Analysis of DNA from Various Tissues from the Patient and of Blood from Family Members.
      Table 1. Microsatellite Analysis of DNA from Various Tissues from the Patient and of Blood from Family Members.
    3. Figure 2. Mixed-Lymphocyte Cultures of Cells from the Patient, Her Two Brothers, and Her Mother and Pooled Cells from Unrelated Control Subjects.
      Figure 2. Mixed-Lymphocyte Cultures of Cells from the Patient, Her Two Brothers, and Her Mother and Pooled Cells from Unrelated Control Subjects.

      Lymphocyte proliferation is reported as a relative response and represents the uptake of tritiated thymidine by responder cells in response to an irradiated population of stimulator lymphocytes, as compared with the uptake of thymidine in response to irradiated control lymphocytes.

    4. Figure 3. Cell-Mediated Lysis.
      Figure 3. Cell-Mediated Lysis.

      Effector cells consisted of primed lymphocytes from the patient, and target cells consisted of phytohemagglutinin-stimulated, irradiated 51Cr-labeled lymphocytes from the patient (as an autologous negative control), her HLA-identical brother (Brother 1), her haploidentical brother (Brother 2), her haploidentical mother, and four unrelated controls. In Panel A, four different effector:target ratios were evaluated (50:1, 25:1, 12.5:1, and 6.25:1), and the percentage of 51Cr released in relation to total amount of cell-associated 51Cr was calculated. At an effector:target ratio of 50:1, the patient's cells were unable to kill cells from her HLA-identical brother, her HLA-haploidentical brother, or her mother (Panel B), whereas cells from her HLA-identical sibling B1 (Brother 1) were able to lyse cells from both his mother and his brother (Panel C).

    5. Figure 4. Proposed Derivation of Various Tissues in the Patient.
      Figure 4. Proposed Derivation of Various Tissues in the Patient.

      The findings were based on the results of polymerase-chain-reaction analysis. Both cell lines are represented to some extent in all tissues except blood.

      More Research