This article is available to subscribers. Subscribe now. Already have an account? Sign in

Original ArticleFree PreviewArchive

Intrathecal Baclofen for Severe Spinal Spasticity

List of authors.
  • Richard D. Penn, M.D.,
  • Suzanne M. Savoy, M.N.S.,
  • Daniel Corcos, Ph.D.,
  • Mark Latash, M.S.,
  • Gerald Gottlieb, Ph.D.,
  • Barbara Parke, M.D.,
  • and Jeffrey S. Kroin, Ph.D.

Abstract

We studied the effect of the intrathecal infusion of baclofen, an agonist of gamma-aminobutyric acid, on abnormal muscle tone and spasms associated with spinal spasticity, in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Twenty patients with spinal spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis or spinal-cord injury who had had no response to treatment with oral baclofen received an intrathecal infusion of baclofen or saline for three days. The infusions were administered by means of a programmable pump implanted in the lumbar subarachnoid space.

Muscle tone decreased in all 20 patients (mean [±SD] Ashworth score for rigidity, from 4.0±1.0 to 1.2±0.4; P<0.0001), and spasms were decreased in 18 of the 19 patients who had spasms (mean [±SD] score for spasm frequency, from 3.3± 1.2 to 0.4±0.8; P<0.0005). Tests for motor function, neurologic examination, and assessments by the patients correctly indicated when baclofen was being infused in all cases.

All patients were then entered in an open long-term trial of continuous infusion of intrathecal baclofen. During a mean follow-up period of 19.2 months (range, 10 to 33), muscle tone has been maintained within the normal range (mean Ashworth score, 1.0±0.1) and spasms have been reduced to a level that does not interfere with activities of daily living (mean spasm score, 0.3±0.6). No drowsiness or confusion occurred, one pump failed, and two catheters became dislodged and had to be replaced. No infections were observed.

Our observations suggest that intrathecal baclofen is an effective long-term treatment for spinal spasticity that has not responded to oral baclofen. (N Engl J Med 1989; 320:1517–21.)

Funding and Disclosures

Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration (Orphan Drug Division).

We are indebted to Dr. Marija Norusis, Department of Preventive Medicine, for help in the design of the study and analysis of the experimental data, and to Mr. Omprakash Paul for assistance.

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Neurosurgery (R.D.P., S.M.S., M.L., J.S.K.), Physiology (G.G.), and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (B.P.), Rush–Presbyterian–St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, and the Department of Physical Education (D.C.), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago. Address reprint requests to Dr. Penn at the Department of Neurosurgery, Rush–Presbyterian–St. Luke's Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress Pky., Chicago, IL 60612.