This article is available to subscribers. Subscribe now. Already have an account? Sign in

Original ArticleFree PreviewArchive

Association of Protamine IgE and IgG Antibodies with Life-Threatening Reactions to Intravenous Protamine

List of authors.
  • Michael E. Weiss, M.D.,
  • Daniel Nyhan, M.D.,
  • Zhikang Peng, M.D.,
  • Jan C. Horrow, M.D.,
  • Edward Lowenstein, M.D.,
  • Carol Hirshman, M.D.,
  • and N. Franklin Adkinson, Jr., M.D.

Abstract

Life-threatening reactions to intravenous protamine, administered to reverse heparin anticoagulation, have been reported with increasing frequency as a consequence of the escalating use of cardiac catheterization and coronary bypass surgery. Retrospective studies have shown that such reactions are more common in diabetic patients receiving daily subcutaneous injections of protamine–insulin preparations. To determine whether antiprotamine IgE or IgG antibodies might explain the increased risk for protamine reactions among patients with protamine–insulin–dependent diabetes, we conducted a case-control study of 27 patients (diabetic and nondiabetic) who had acute reactions to intravenous protamine and 43 diabetic patients who tolerated protamine without a reaction during diagnostic or surgical procedures. Cases and controls were grouped according to previous exposure to protamine–insulin preparations.

In diabetic patients who had received protamine–insulin injections, the presence of serum antiprotamine IgE antibody was a significant risk factor for acute protamine reactions (relative risk, 95; P = 1.0x10–5), as was antiprotamine IgG (relative risk, 38; P = 1.2x10–5). No patients without previous exposure to protamine–insulin injections had serum protamine IgE antibodies. In this group, antiprotamine IgG antibody was a risk factor for protamine reactions (relative risk, 25; P = 0.0062).

We conclude that in protamine–insulin–dependent diabetics, the increased risk of serious reactions when intravenous protamine was given appeared to be caused largely by antibody-mediated mechanisms. In nondiabetic subjects, the presence of protamine IgG was significantly associated with an increased risk of acute protamine reactions, although many nondiabetic subjects who had reactions had no IgG antibodies. (N Engl J Med 1989; 320:886–92.)

Funding and Disclosures

Supported in part by grants (AI 20136 and HL 23591) from the National Institutes of Health and by the U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention.

We are indebted to Drs. John Keifer, Simon Gelman, Jerold Levy, Michael Roizen, George W. Rung, William Merritt, Richard Shapiro, Ralph Braunschweig, Charles Buffington, and Thomas Blank; to the Division of Cardiac Anesthesia at Johns Hopkins Hospital; to Karen E. Lynch, R.N., at Massachusetts General Hospital for providing serum samples and clinical data; to Leslie Garrison, M.D., M.P.H., for providing statistical consultation; and to Kathy Pessaro for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology (M.E.W., Z.P., N.F.A.), and the Department of Anesthesia (D.N., C.H.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore; the Department of Anesthesia, Hahnemann Medical School, Philadelphia (J.C.H.); and the Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (E.L.). Address reprint requests to Dr. Weiss at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology at the Good Samaritan Hospital, 5601 Loch Raven Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21239.

Print Subscriber? Activate your online access.