This article is available to subscribers. Subscribe now. Already have an account? Sign in

Original Article

Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death

List of authors.
  • Michael Bretthauer, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Magnus Løberg, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Paulina Wieszczy, Ph.D.,
  • Mette Kalager, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Louise Emilsson, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Kjetil Garborg, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Maciej Rupinski, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Evelien Dekker, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Manon Spaander, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Marek Bugajski, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Øyvind Holme, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Ann G. Zauber, Ph.D.,
  • Nastazja D. Pilonis, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Andrzej Mroz, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Ernst J. Kuipers, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Joy Shi, Ph.D.,
  • Miguel A. Hernán, M.D., Dr.Ph.,
  • Hans-Olov Adami, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Jaroslaw Regula, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • Geir Hoff, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • and Michal F. Kaminski, M.D., Ph.D.
  • for the NordICC Study Group*

Abstract

Background

Although colonoscopy is widely used as a screening test to detect colorectal cancer, its effect on the risks of colorectal cancer and related death is unclear.

Methods

Download a PDF of the Research Summary.

We performed a pragmatic, randomized trial involving presumptively healthy men and women 55 to 64 years of age drawn from population registries in Poland, Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands between 2009 and 2014. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio either to receive an invitation to undergo a single screening colonoscopy (the invited group) or to receive no invitation or screening (the usual-care group). The primary end points were the risks of colorectal cancer and related death, and the secondary end point was death from any cause.

Results

Follow-up data were available for 84,585 participants in Poland, Norway, and Sweden — 28,220 in the invited group, 11,843 of whom (42.0%) underwent screening, and 56,365 in the usual-care group. A total of 15 participants had major bleeding after polyp removal. No perforations or screening-related deaths occurred within 30 days after colonoscopy. During a median follow-up of 10 years, 259 cases of colorectal cancer were diagnosed in the invited group as compared with 622 cases in the usual-care group. In intention-to-screen analyses, the risk of colorectal cancer at 10 years was 0.98% in the invited group and 1.20% in the usual-care group, a risk reduction of 18% (risk ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 0.93). The risk of death from colorectal cancer was 0.28% in the invited group and 0.31% in the usual-care group (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.16). The number needed to invite to undergo screening to prevent one case of colorectal cancer was 455 (95% CI, 270 to 1429). The risk of death from any cause was 11.03% in the invited group and 11.04% in the usual-care group (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.04).

Conclusions

In this randomized trial, the risk of colorectal cancer at 10 years was lower among participants who were invited to undergo screening colonoscopy than among those who were assigned to no screening. (Funded by the Research Council of Norway and others; NordICC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00883792.)

Digital Object ThumbnailQUICK TAKE VIDEO SUMMARY
Colonoscopy Screening and Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death
 02:34

Continue reading this article

Select an option below:

Create your account to get 2 free subscriber-only articles each month.

Get Free Access Now Subscribe For Full Access

Already have an account?

Sign In

Print subscriber?

Activate your online access.

Funding and Disclosures

Supported by research grants from the Research Council of Norway (197309), Nordic Cancer Union, Norwegian Cancer Society, and Health Fund of South-East Norway (5135); bowel preparation free of charge for colonoscopies in Norway from Dr. Falk Pharma; grants from the National Center for Research and Development of Poland (N R13 0024 04), Polish–Norwegian Research Program (Pol-Nor/204233/30/2013), Medical Center for Postgraduate Education (501-1-09-12-12/22), the Polish Foundation of Gastroenterology, the Dutch Ministry of Health and Health Care Prevention, Program–Implementation (ZonMw 2008), the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development of the Dutch Ministry of Health (ZonMw 120720012), the Center for Translational Molecular Medicine (CTMM DeCoDe-project), and the Swedish Cancer Foundation (2010/345 and CAN 2013/553); a Distinguished Professor Award from the Karolinska Institutet, Regional forskningsfond i Uppsala–Örebro regionen (2368/10-221, to Dr. Adami); and a grant from Afa (130072).

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

This article was published on October 9, 2022, at NEJM.org.

A data sharing statement provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

We thank the NordICC data and safety monitoring board, which consisted of Jean Faivre, Jack Mandel, and Stephen Duffy.

Author Affiliations

From the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group (M. Bretthauer, M.L., P.W., M.K., K.G., M. Bugajski, Ø.H., H.-O.A., M.F.K.) and the Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society (L.E.), University of Oslo, the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital (M. Bretthauer, M.L., M.K., K.G., Ø.H., H.-O.A.), and the Cancer Registry of Norway (G.H.), Oslo, the Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø (M. Bretthauer), and the Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital, Skien (G.H.) — all in Norway; the Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), and the Departments of Pathology (A.M.) and Gastroenterological Oncology (P.W., M.R., M. Bugajski, N.D.P., A.M., J.R., M.F.K.), Medical Center of Postgraduate Education — both in Warsaw, Poland; Vårdcentralen Värmlands Nysäter and the Center for Clinical Research, County Council of Värmland, Karlsdad (L.E.), and the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna (L.E., H.-O.A.) — both in Sweden; the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, and the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (E.D.), and the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam (M.S., E.J.K.) — all in the Netherlands; the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (A.G.Z.); and CAUSALab, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (J.S., M.A.H.).

Dr. Bretthauer can be contacted at or at the Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Postbox 1089, Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway.

The members of the NordICC Study Group are listed in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org.