This article is available to subscribers. Subscribe now. Already have an account? Sign in

Original Article

Intensive Glucose Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes — 15-Year Follow-up

  • Peter D. Reaven, M.D.,
  • Nicholas V. Emanuele, M.D.,
  • Wyndy L. Wiitala, Ph.D.,
  • Gideon D. Bahn, Ph.D.,
  • Domenic J. Reda, Ph.D.,
  • Madeline McCarren, Ph.D.,
  • William C. Duckworth, M.D.,
  • and Rodney A. Hayward, M.D.
  • for the VADT Investigators*

Abstract

Background

We previously reported that a median of 5.6 years of intensive as compared with standard glucose lowering in 1791 military veterans with type 2 diabetes resulted in a risk of major cardiovascular events that was significantly lower (by 17%) after a total of 10 years of combined intervention and observational follow-up. We now report the full 15-year follow-up.

Methods

We observationally followed enrolled participants (complete cohort) after the conclusion of the original clinical trial by using central databases to identify cardiovascular events, hospitalizations, and deaths. Participants were asked whether they would be willing to provide additional data by means of surveys and chart reviews (survey cohort). The prespecified primary outcome was a composite of major cardiovascular events, including nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, new or worsening congestive heart failure, amputation for ischemic gangrene, and death from cardiovascular causes. Death from any cause was a prespecified secondary outcome.

Results

There were 1655 participants in the complete cohort and 1391 in the survey cohort. During the trial (which originally enrolled 1791 participants), the separation of the glycated hemoglobin curves between the intensive-therapy group (892 participants) and the standard-therapy group (899 participants) averaged 1.5 percentage points, and this difference declined to 0.2 to 0.3 percentage points by 3 years after the trial ended. Over a period of 15 years of follow-up (active treatment plus post-trial observation), the risks of major cardiovascular events or death were not lower in the intensive-therapy group than in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio for primary outcome, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.06; P=0.23; hazard ratio for death, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.18). The risk of major cardiovascular disease outcomes was reduced, however, during an extended interval of separation of the glycated hemoglobin curves (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.99), but this benefit did not continue after equalization of the glycated hemoglobin levels (hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.75).

Conclusions

Participants with type 2 diabetes who had been randomly assigned to intensive glucose control for 5.6 years had a lower risk of cardiovascular events than those who received standard therapy only during the prolonged period in which the glycated hemoglobin curves were separated. There was no evidence of a legacy effect or a mortality benefit with intensive glucose control. (Funded by the VA Cooperative Studies Program; VADT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00032487.)

Digital Object ThumbnailQUICK TAKE VIDEO SUMMARY
The Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial after 15 Years
 01:40

Continue reading this article

Select an option below:

Register to get 3 free subscriber-only articles each month.

Get Free Access Now Subscribe For Full Access

Already have an account?

Sign In

Print subscriber?

Activate your online access.

Funding and Disclosures

Supported by the Office of Research and Development of the VA Cooperative Studies Program. The primary VA Diabetes Trial (VADT; CSP 465) received support from the VA Cooperative Studies Program, the American Diabetes Association, and the National Eye Institute. Pharmaceutical and other supplies and financial assistance for the VADT were provided by GlaxoSmithKline, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi–Aventis, Amylin Pharmaceuticals, and Kos Pharmaceuticals.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

Dr. Reaven reports receiving grant support from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novo Nordisk, fees for serving on an advisory board from Sanofi and Boston Heart Diagnostics, and lecture fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical; and Dr. Emanuele, receiving lecture fees from Merck. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) or the U.S. government.

We thank Carlos Abraira, M.D., William G. Henderson, M.D., Ph.D., and Grant D. Huang, M.P.H., Ph.D., for assistance in initiating and conducting the VADT; Hertzel Gerstein, M.D., and Juraj Koska, M.D., for suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript; and Ling Ge, M.S., for statistical programming.

Author Affiliations

From the Phoenix Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System, Phoenix (P.D.R., W.C.D.); the Hines VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center and Hines VA Hospital (N.V.E., G.D.B., D.J.R.) and the VA Pharmacy Benefits Management Services (M.M.), Hines, IL; and the VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI (W.L.W., R.A.H.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Reaven at the Phoenix VA Health Care System, 650 E. Indian School Rd., Phoenix, AZ 85012, or at .

A complete list of the investigators in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) is provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org.