Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Special Article

Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Treatment in Resource-Poor Settings — The Case of Côte d'Ivoire

Sue J. Goldie, M.D., M.P.H., Yazdan Yazdanpanah, M.D., Ph.D., Elena Losina, Ph.D., Milton C. Weinstein, Ph.D., Xavier Anglaret, M.D., Ph.D., Rochelle P. Walensky, M.D., M.P.H., Heather E. Hsu, A.B., April Kimmel, M.S., Charles Holmes, M.D., M.P.H., Jonathan E. Kaplan, M.D., and Kenneth A. Freedberg, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1141-1153September 14, 2006

Abstract

Background

As antiretroviral therapy is increasingly used in settings with limited resources, key questions about the timing of treatment and use of diagnostic tests to guide clinical decisions must be addressed.

Methods

We assessed the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for a cohort of adults in Côte d'Ivoire who were infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (mean age, 33 years; CD4 cell count, 331 per cubic millimeter; HIV RNA level, 5.3 log copies per milliliter). Using a computer-based simulation model that incorporates the CD4 cell count and HIV RNA level as predictors of disease progression, we compared the long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with no treatment, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis alone, antiretroviral therapy alone, and prophylaxis with antiretroviral therapy.

Results

Undiscounted gains in life expectancy ranged from 10.7 months with antiretroviral therapy and prophylaxis initiated on the basis of clinical criteria to 45.9 months with antiretroviral therapy and prophylaxis initiated on the basis of CD4 testing and clinical criteria, as compared with trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis alone. The incremental cost per year of life gained was $240 (in 2002 U.S. dollars) for prophylaxis alone, $620 for antiretroviral therapy and prophylaxis without CD4 testing, and $1,180 for antiretroviral therapy and prophylaxis with CD4 testing, each compared with the next least expensive strategy. None of the strategies that used antiretroviral therapy alone were as cost-effective as those that also used trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis. Life expectancy was increased by 30% with use of a second line of antiretroviral therapy after failure of the first-line regimen.

Conclusions

A strategy of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy, with the use of clinical criteria alone or in combination with CD4 testing to guide the timing of treatment, is an economically attractive health investment in settings with limited resources.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Internal Validity of the Model.
Figure 2Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies.
Article

The use of potent antiretroviral therapy has transformed the epidemic of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in populations with access to these drugs.1 In settings with limited resources, where the provision of antiretroviral therapy was previously thought to be technically impossible, combination regimens have been found to have short-term efficacy similar to that in developed countries.2-8 The dramatic rise in global funding for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and AIDS,9,10 together with reduced drug costs,11-14 improves the feasibility of providing antiretroviral therapy in settings with limited resources.

As part of the “3 by 5” initiative to distribute antiretroviral treatment to 3 million people in 50 developing countries by the end of 2005, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed guidelines that incorporate evidence from clinical trials and observational studies of the efficacy and toxicity of antiretroviral therapy.15 In addition to the relative efficacy, feasibility, and affordability of various treatment regimens, clinical guidance for treating patients with HIV infection requires consideration of criteria for initiating antiretroviral therapy, the relative performance and costs of diagnostic tests, and coordination with other treatment options, such as prophylaxis against opportunistic disease.

When the complexity of a clinical problem involves competing choices and the information required for some components of the decision is incomplete, decision-analysis methods offer a systematic approach to synthesizing existing data and quantifying the trade-offs for alternative options. Capitalizing on the availability of primary data from Côte d'Ivoire2 and a recent analysis of the costs of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis,16 we conducted a decision analysis to estimate the clinical and economic outcomes associated with different treatment strategies in adults infected with HIV type 1 (HIV-1) in Côte d'Ivoire, a setting with limited resources.

Methods

Overview

We modified a previously published model17 to simulate the natural history of HIV infection in patients in Côte d'Ivoire and to project the short- and long-term outcomes associated with trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis alone, antiretroviral therapy alone, and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis with antiretroviral therapy. We compared 22 strategies in which thresholds for initiating and discontinuing a single line of antiretroviral therapy were based on clinical criteria alone or on both the CD4 cell count and clinical criteria. The comparative performance of various strategies was assessed with the use of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, in 2002 U.S. dollars per year of life gained. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, defined as the additional cost of a strategy, divided by its additional clinical benefit, as compared with the next least expensive strategy. We excluded strategies with higher costs and lower benefits than other options and those with higher incremental cost-effectiveness ratios than other more effective options.18 We adopted a modified societal perspective, in that the costs of patients' time and travel were not included, and future costs and benefits were discounted at 3% per year.18

Model

We used first-order Monte Carlo simulation in which disease progression in an individual patient is characterized as a sequence of monthly transitions between health states.19 Health states in the model, descriptive of each patient's underlying true health, were defined by current and maximum HIV RNA levels, current and nadir CD4 cell counts, and current and prior opportunistic diseases. Individual characteristics (age, sex, CD4 cell count, and HIV RNA level) were randomly drawn from a specified distribution of patients similar to those enrolled in the placebo group of the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS) 059 trial, a randomized, controlled trial of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire20: median age, 33 years; 40% men; and baseline CD4 cell count, 331 cells per cubic millimeter. Each patient's lifetime clinical course was tracked, with all clinical events and accrued costs tallied. One million patients were simulated, one at a time, in order to provide stable estimates of long-term outcomes for each strategy.

Disease progression was modeled as a function of both the HIV RNA level and the CD4 cell count.17,21,22 Opportunistic diseases were divided into 11 groups and categorized as severe or mild.16,23 Incidence rates of opportunistic diseases and AIDS-related death were modeled as a function of the CD4 cell count and the presence or absence of a history of opportunistic infection. Successful HIV RNA suppression after antiretroviral therapy resulted in a rise in the CD4 cell count and a corresponding reduction in the risks of opportunistic disease and death. Virologic failure was defined in the model as a 0.5-log increase in the HIV RNA level in 2 consecutive months while the patient was receiving antiretroviral therapy, after which the CD4 cell count stayed constant for 1 year before declining at a monthly rate that depended on the viral load. Although the model updated CD4 cell counts and HIV RNA levels monthly and determined disease progression on the basis of these values, we assumed that clinical decisions were based on less frequent CD4 testing and clinical assessments (every 6 to 12 months) (see the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at www.nejm.org).

Several assumptions were necessary because of uncertainty about the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy; the rationale for our choices for the base case is described in the Supplementary Appendix.24-27 We conservatively assumed that after 10 years, patients no longer had virologic improvement; that after virologic failure, there was a delay of 12 months before the CD4 cell count started to decline; and that in patients with a CD4 cell count of 50 per cubic millimeter or higher, antiretroviral therapy had an independent effect in reducing the incidence of opportunistic disease and mortality from AIDS.23,28

Simulated Strategies

Antiretroviral therapy was initiated on the basis of a defined number of specific opportunistic diseases, the results of a CD4 test, or both. When CD4 testing was available, we assumed that antiretroviral therapy was started in patients with a CD4 count of less than 200 per cubic millimeter; a CD4 count of 200 to 350 per cubic millimeter with severe malaria, a severe bacterial infection, a severe fungal infection, tuberculosis, isosporiasis, cerebral toxoplasmosis, nontuberculous mycobacteriosis, or another severe illness; or a CD4 cell count of more than 350 per cubic millimeter and a severe opportunistic disease other than malaria, bacterial infection, or tuberculosis. Antiretroviral therapy was discontinued, or second-line therapy was instituted, on the basis of an observed 50% or 90% decrease from the peak CD4 cell count during treatment. When CD4 testing was unavailable, we assumed that antiretroviral therapy was initiated if either one or two severe opportunistic diseases developed and was discontinued (or switched to second-line therapy) if there was clinical failure, defined as a specified number of severe opportunistic diseases (one, three, or five). To ensure adequate time for the immunologic benefits of antiretroviral therapy to be realized,29 opportunistic diseases diagnosed during the first 6 months of antiretroviral therapy were not considered as criteria for discontinuation of treatment.

We conservatively assumed that only a single antiretroviral regimen was available, although second-line therapy was evaluated in a secondary analysis. We also made the following six assumptions: trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis was initiated when the CD4 cell count was less than 500 per cubic millimeter or after any opportunistic disease; if CD4 testing was not available, routine clinic visits occurred every 12 months; after an opportunistic disease or during treatment with trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole and antiretroviral therapy, visits occurred every 6 months; if CD4 testing was available, clinic visits and CD4 testing occurred every 6 months; treatment was provided for opportunistic diseases, with the exception of Kaposi's sarcoma, lymphoma, invasive herpesvirus infection, and cytomegalovirus infection; and lifelong maintenance therapy was provided for pneumocystis pneumonia and isosporiasis but not for toxoplasmosis or nontuberculous mycobacteriosis.

Baseline Estimates for Model Variables

Baseline estimates for selected variables, as derived from published studies, are shown in Table 1Table 1Baseline Estimates for Selected Model Variables..2,3,5-8,11-14,16,20-23,28,30-34 Additional details are provided in the Supplementary Appendix. Estimates of the initial HIV RNA distribution, efficacy of antiretroviral therapy, and drug toxicity were obtained from the ANRS 1203 study, a continuation of the ANRS 059 study of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.2 Estimates of the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy implicitly reflect the rate of adherence in the trial from which the data are drawn; we therefore conducted a sensitivity analysis based on estimates from a literature review.3,5-8,35 Estimates for the incidence of opportunistic diseases and death were based on data from the placebo group in the ANRS 059 study and estimated as functions of four CD4 strata (≤50, 51 to 200, 201 to 500, and >500 cells per cubic millimeter) as previously described.17,20,23,33 Mortality rates from causes other than HIV infection were based on data specific for Côte d'Ivoire.36

Direct medical costs of HIV-related care included the costs of hospitalizations, outpatient consultations, laboratory tests, clinical procedures, and medications.20 Costs were estimated for the treatment of opportunistic diseases and for long-term care (termed “routine care costs”) in patients with different CD4 cell counts, as previously described (see the Supplementary Appendix).16 Costs were inflated to 2002 price levels with adjustment according to the gross domestic product (GDP) for Côte d'Ivoire, and costs in local currency were converted to U.S. dollars on the basis of prevailing exchange rates.37,38

The study was approved by the institutional review boards at the participating institutions. The requirement for informed consent was waived because our study involved analysis of secondary data.

Results

Model Validation

Figure 1Figure 1Internal Validity of the Model. shows the model-based estimates of opportunistic diseases as compared with data from the ANRS 059 trial.20 Projected model outcomes were generally within 10 to 15% of reported trial results.

Base-Case Analysis

Figure 2Figure 2Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies. shows the relationship between the total lifetime costs and discounted life expectancy for all 22 treatment strategies assessed. Strategies involving both antiretroviral therapy and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis were consistently more effective and more cost-effective than those involving antiretroviral therapy alone. Strategies based on CD4 measurements and clinical criteria for initiating and discontinuing antiretroviral therapy were always more effective than strategies based on clinical criteria alone.

Table 2Table 2Clinical Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Treatment Strategies. shows the costs, life expectancy, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios associated with the six most efficient strategies. Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole alone increased undiscounted life expectancy by 1.6 months and cost $240 per year of life gained, as compared with no treatment. The incremental benefit of using antiretroviral therapy in addition to prophylaxis ranged from 10.7 to 45.9 undiscounted months, depending on the criteria for initiating and discontinuing antiretroviral therapy. The most effective strategy used CD4 testing and provided a gain of 14.0 months in life expectancy, at a cost of $1,180 per year of life gained, as compared with strategies relying on clinical information alone.

Sensitivity Analysis

Figure 3Figure 3Sensitivity Analysis of Potentially Important Model Variables. shows how the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the most effective strategy, antiretroviral therapy and prophylaxis with the use of CD4 testing, varied with changes in selected variables. The results were most sensitive to changes in the costs of routine care, antiretroviral therapy, and CD4 tests and were less sensitive to plausible changes in the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy and in the costs of treatment for opportunistic diseases.

The most influential of the base-case assumptions was that of an independent effect of antiretroviral therapy on the incidence of opportunistic disease and mortality from AIDS among patients with a CD4 cell count of 50 per cubic millimeter or higher.17,20,23,33 For the most effective strategy (antiretroviral therapy and prophylaxis with the use of CD4 testing), gains in life expectancy over that associated with no treatment were approximately 50% lower and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were twice those for the base case when we assumed no independent effect of antiretroviral therapy. Other assumptions (e.g., a delayed decline in the CD4 cell count after virologic failure and the enduring efficacy of antiretroviral therapy) similarly influenced both life-expectancy gains and costs, and thus had minimal influence on cost-effectiveness (see the Supplementary Appendix).

With access to second-line antiretroviral therapy, life expectancy improved by 10 months (approximately 30%), lifetime costs increased by $1,080, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $1,300 per year of life gained as compared with the most effective first-line antiretroviral strategy. Results of sensitivity analyses that included first- and second-line treatment were similar to those in the base case (see the Supplementary Appendix).

Table 3Table 3Sensitivity Analysis of Opportunistic Diseases (ODs) Included in the Clinical Criteria for Starting Antiretroviral Therapy (ART). shows the average CD4 cell count at which antiretroviral therapy was initiated if CD4 testing was not available, as well as the incremental gains in life expectancy as compared with no treatment, for three strategies with different clinical criteria for initiating treatment. In the base case, the average CD4 cell count at the initiation of antiretroviral therapy was higher with the more lenient criterion of one opportunistic disease than with the stricter criterion of two opportunistic diseases (255 vs. 189 per cubic millimeter), when CD4 testing was not available. With the most effective strategy, involving the use of both clinical criteria and CD4 test information to guide the initiation of antiretroviral therapy, the average CD4 cell count at which treatment was initiated was 231 per cubic millimeter, reflecting the most efficient targeting of patients likely to benefit from therapy.

For all three strategies, as the set of opportunistic diseases used as criteria for the initiation of antiretroviral therapy was expanded incrementally to include severe malaria, tuberculosis, and severe bacterial disease, the average CD4 cell count at which treatment was initiated increased (Table 3). With the most inclusive set of opportunistic diseases, the incremental increases in life expectancy were greatest for strategies that rely solely on clinical criteria.

Discussion

Several studies have addressed economic issues related to the prevention and treatment of HIV infection in developing countries,39-45 but few analyses have compared different strategies for initiating antiretroviral therapy by quantifying their clinical benefits for individual patients. When added to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis, antiretroviral therapy with the use of CD4 testing provided a gain in life expectancy of nearly 4 years. For strategies relying only on clinical criteria, the initiation of antiretroviral therapy after the first severe opportunistic disease provided nearly 1 year of additional life expectancy, as compared with initiation of treatment after two opportunistic diseases. Furthermore, if only a single antiretroviral regimen is available, delaying its discontinuation until three or more opportunistic diseases occur provides substantial clinical benefits. The added value of CD4 testing to guide decisions about the timing of treatment translated into a gain in life expectancy of more than 1 year, as compared with the most effective strategy relying solely on clinical information. These survival gains are similar to, or exceed, those associated with most other treatment interventions.46

There is no universal definition of a threshold ratio above which an intervention would not be considered cost-effective. Some have suggested that interventions with cost-effectiveness ratios less than the per capita GDP for a given country ($708 in Côte d'Ivoire) be considered “very cost-effective,” and less than three times the per capita GDP ($2,124 in Côte d'Ivoire) be considered “cost-effective.”47,48 In the absence of available CD4 testing, providing trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis and antiretroviral therapy according to the earliest initiation and latest discontinuation criteria would be very cost-effective, and the most effective strategy — using both CD4 testing and clinical criteria to guide decisions about the timing of treatment — would also be cost-effective; these approaches are consistent with the WHO guidelines.

This analysis has several limitations. We focused on survival gains, since there are limited data on disability or quality-of-life weights that are suitable for health states in our model. In addition, data were combined from multiple sources. Some cost variables were extrapolated from a clinical trial, although we omitted costs of protocol-driven procedures that are unlikely to be available in low-income settings.32 We did not include lost productivity costs associated with AIDS, but if we had, antiretroviral therapy and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis would have been even more cost-effective. Since we allowed for variation in CD4 measurements but did not explicitly model errors in clinical information, we may have unfairly biased the analysis against CD4 testing.

To make the results most relevant to real-world decisions, we focused on a narrow subgroup of questions about the most effective strategies for using clinical criteria with or without CD4 testing to guide the initiation and discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy when only a single line of therapy is available. The results for two lines of therapy are similar. A dynamic transmission model would be needed to address questions at the population level about the relative cost-effectiveness of both prevention and treatment strategies. The growing consensus, however, is that both prevention and treatment are critical to the control of HIV infection in developing countries.44,45,49 Although the issue of HIV screening is beyond the scope of this report, improved screening and linkage to care would allow a larger segment of the HIV-infected population to benefit from antiretroviral therapy. The benefits of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis reported for HIV-infected patients in Côte d'Ivoire should be extrapolated with caution to sub-Saharan African countries with a high prevalence of resistance to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole,50,51 although benefits have been shown even in these areas.52-55

Finally, this analysis focuses on HIV-1, not HIV-2. In areas with high rates of HIV-2 infection, additional issues should be considered, such as the optimal choice of a first-line antiretroviral regimen in the setting of resistance to nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors.52,53

Cost-effectiveness is only one consideration in the allocation of scarce resources.49,56,57 There may be differences in the availability of strategies, and the selection of a strategy may be based on considerations of infrastructure, equity, qualitative attributes, nonmonetary constraints, or synergy with other high-priority initiatives.49,56-58 Strategies identified as cost-effective may be unaffordable in the poorest countries without assistance. The results of this analysis may be used, however, to motivate the global community to direct resources toward investments that have the greatest promise of providing gains in health. Better data from treatment-rollout programs — data on efficacy, toxicity, direct medical and programmatic costs (including costs of reducing wastage and scaling up) — should be incorporated when available.59 This is particularly important because nonmedical costs have been found to account for a substantial proportion of the total costs of interventions in other diseases.60

Our results show that a single regimen of antiretroviral therapy combined with trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis affords major survival benefits. Adding second-line regimens will increase survival further. It is always more effective and cost-effective to use trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole in combination with an antiretroviral regimen. Approaches guided by CD4 testing, although more costly than those based on clinical information alone, are substantially more effective in terms of survival and are a promising public health investment.

Supported by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (RO1-AI058736, K23-AI01794, K24-AI062476, and K25-AI50436), the French Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (1286), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Cooperative Agreements U64/CCU 114927 and U64/CCU 119525).

Dr. Holmes was a faculty member at Harvard Medical School when the study was designed, performed, submitted, and accepted for publication. As of July 1, 2006, he is an employee of Gilead Sciences and reports owning equity in that entity. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

We are indebted to the entire Global AIDS Policy model team and investigators in Côte d'Ivoire, including Siaka Touré, Catherine Seyler, Eugène Messou, and Thérèse N'Dri-Yoman (Programme PACCI, Abidjan) for their contributions; to N. Kumarasamy, J. Anitha Cecelia, and A.K. Ganesh (Y.R. Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education, Chennai, India); to R. Wood (University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa); to G. Gray, J. McIntyre, N.A. Martinson, and L. Mohapi (Perinatal HIV Research Unit, WITS Health Consortium, Johannesburg, South Africa); to M. Lipsitch, J. Sevilla, and G.R. Seage III (Harvard School of Public Health, Boston); to T. Flanigan and K. Mayer (Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island); to A.D. Paltiel (Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut); to M. Bender, Z. Lu, B. Wang, N. Divi, L. Wolf, and C. Scott (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston); and to Steven Sweet and Hong Zhang (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston) for outstanding technical and computer-programming assistance.

Source Information

From the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston (S.J.G., M.C.W., A.K., K.A.F.); Service Universitaire des Maladies Infectieuses et du Voyageur, Centre Hospitalier de Tourcoing, EA 2694, Faculté de Médecine de Lille, and Laboratoire de Recherches Économiques et Sociales, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité de Recherche Associée 362, Lille — all in France (Y.Y.); Boston University School of Public Health, Boston (E.L., K.A.F.); INSERM Unité 593, Bordeaux, France, and Programme PAC-CI, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire (X.A.); Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (R.P.W., H.E.H., C.H., K.A.F.); the Section of Decision Science and Clinical Systems Modeling, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (H.E.H.); and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (J.E.K.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Goldie at the Department of Health Policy and Management, Program in Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Ave., 2nd Fl., Boston, MA 02115, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    Palella FJ Jr, Deloria-Knoll M, Chmiel JS, et al. Survival benefit of initiating antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected persons in different CD4+ cell strata. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:620-626
    Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Seyler C, Anglaret X, Dakoury-Dogbo N, et al. Medium-term survival, morbidity and immunovirological evolution in HIV-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapy, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. Antivir Ther 2003;8:385-393
    Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Landman R, Schiemann R, Thiam S, et al. Once-a-day highly active antiretroviral therapy in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults in Senegal. AIDS 2003;17:1017-1022
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Weidle PJ, Malamba S, Mwebaze R, et al. Assessment of a pilot antiretroviral drug therapy programme in Uganda: patients' response, survival, and drug resistance. Lancet 2002;360:34-40
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Laurent C, Ngom Gueye NF, Ndour CT, et al. Long-term benefits of highly active antiretroviral therapy in Senegalese HIV-1-infected adults. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005;38:14-17
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Laurent C, Kouanfack C, Koulla-Shiro S, et al. Effectiveness and safety of a generic fixed-dose combination of nevirapine, stavudine, and lamivudine in HIV-1-infected adults in Cameroon: open-label multicentre trial. Lancet 2004;364:29-34
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Coetzee D, Hildebrand K, Boulle A, et al. Outcomes after two years of providing antiretroviral treatment in Khayelitsha, South Africa. AIDS 2004;18:887-895
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Djomand G, Roels T, Ellerbrock T, et al. Virologic and immunologic outcomes and programmatic challenges of an antiretroviral treatment pilot project in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. AIDS 2003;17:Suppl 3:S5-S15
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    AIDS epidemic update — December, 2004. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), World Health Organization (WHO), 2004. (Accessed August 10, 2006, at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/unaids/2004/9291733903.pdf.)

  10. 10

    Lamptey P, Wilson D. Scaling up AIDS treatment: what is the potential impact and what are the risks? PLoS Med 2005;2:e39-e39
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    AIDS Medicines and Diagnostics Service (AMDS). Geneva: World Health Organization. (Accessed August 18, 2006, at http://www.who.int/3by5/amds/en/.)

  12. 12

    Indicative costs per patient per year for anti-retroviral medicines supplied by UNICEF. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. (Accessed August 18, 2006, at http://www.who.int/3by5/amds/cost_unicef04.pdf.)

  13. 13

    Untangling the web of price reductions: a pricing guide for ARVs in developing countries. 6th ed. Geneva: Médecins sans Frontières, 2004. (Accessed August 18, 2006, at http://www.accessmed-msf.org/documents/untanglingtheweb6.pdf.)

  14. 14

    Sources and prices of selected drugs and diagnostics for people living with HIV/AIDS. A joint UNICEF, UNAIDS Secretariat, WHO, MSF project. 2003. (Accessed August 18, 2006, at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/WHO_EDM_PAR_2003.7.pdf.)

  15. 15

    Scaling up antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: treatment guidelines for a public health approach — 2003 revision. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003. (Accessed August 18, 2006, at http://www.who.int/3by5/publications/documents/arv_guidelines/en/.)

  16. 16

    Yazdanpanah Y, Losina E, Anglaret X, et al. Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis in patients with HIV/AIDS in Côte d'Ivoire: a trial-based analysis. AIDS 2005;19:1299-1308
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Freedberg KA, Losina E, Weinstein MC, et al. The cost-effectiveness of combination antiretroviral therapy for HIV disease. N Engl J Med 2001;344:824-831
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

  19. 19

    Kuntz KM, Weinstein MC. Modeling in economic evaluation. In: Drummond MF, McGuire A, eds. Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001:141-71.

  20. 20

    Anglaret X, Chene G, Attia A, et al. Early chemoprophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole for HIV-1-infected adults in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;353:1463-1468
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Mellors JW, Munoz A, Giorgi JV, et al. Plasma viral load and CD4+ lymphocytes as prognostic markers of HIV-1 infection. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:946-954
    Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Public use dataset: Release PO4. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 1995.

  23. 23

    Losina E, Anglaret X, Yazdanpanah Y, et al. Incidence of opportunistic infections (OIs) and mortality within specific CD4 strata in HIV-infected patients in Côte d'Ivoire. In: Programs and abstracts of the International AIDS Conference, Barcelona, July 7–12, 2002.

  24. 24

    Levitz SM. Improvement in CD4+ cell counts despite persistently detectable HIV load. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1074-1075
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Deeks SG, Barbour JD, Martin JN, Swanson MS, Grant RM. Sustained CD4+ T cell response after virologic failure of protease inhibitor-based regimens in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis 2000;181:946-953
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Deeks SG, Barbour JD, Grant RM, Martin JN. Duration and predictors of CD4 T-cell gains in patients who continue combination therapy despite detectable plasma viremia. AIDS 2002;16:201-207
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  27. 27

    Ledergerber B, Lundgren JD, Walker AS, et al. Predictors of trend in CD4-positive T-cell count and mortality among HIV-1-infected individuals with virological failure to all three antiretroviral-drug classes. Lancet 2004;364:51-62
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Cole SR, Hernan MA, Robins JM, et al. Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on time to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or death using marginal structural models. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:687-694
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Kumarasamy N, Chaguturu S, Mayer KH, et al. Incidence of immune reconstitution syndrome in HIV/tuberculosis-coinfected patients after initiation of generic antiretroviral therapy in India. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004;37:1574-1576
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    Ivers LC, Kendrick D, Doucette K. Efficacy of antiretroviral therapy programs in resource-poor settings: a meta-analysis of the published literature. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:217-224
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Untangling the web of price reductions: a pricing guide for ARVs in developing countries. 7th ed. Geneva: Médecins sans Frontières, 2005. (Accessed August 18, 2006, at http://www.accessmed-msf.org/documents/untanglingtheweb%208.pdf.)

  32. 32

    WHO-CHOICE. Prices for hospitals and health centres. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. (Accessed August 18, 2006, at http://www3.who.int/whosis/cea/prices/unit.cfm?path=evidence,cea,cea_prices,cea_prices_unit&language=English.)

  33. 33

    Anglaret X, Messou E, Ouassa T, et al. Pattern of bacterial diseases in a cohort of HIV-1 infected adults receiving cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. AIDS 2003;17:575-584
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    Lucas GM, Chaisson RE, Moore RD. Highly active antiretroviral therapy in a large urban clinic: risk factors for virologic failure and adverse drug reactions. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:81-87
    Web of Science | Medline

  35. 35

    Goldie SJ, Paltiel AD, Weinstein MC, et al. Projecting the cost-effectiveness of adherence interventions in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am J Med 2003;115:632-641
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  36. 36

    Lopez A, Ahmad O, Guillot M, et al. World mortality in 2000: life tables for 191 countries. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.

  37. 37

    World Bank Development Indicators, 2002. CD-ROM edition. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, June 2002.

  38. 38

    OANDA Corporation. Nominal interbank exchange rates (year averages). (Accessed August 18, 2006, at http://www.oanda.com/convert/fxhistory.)

  39. 39

    Schwartlander B, Stover J, Walker N, et al. AIDS: resource needs for HIV/AIDS. Science 2001;292:2434-2436
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  40. 40

    Marseille E, Kahn JG, Mmiro F, et al. Cost effectiveness of single-dose nevirapine regimen for mothers and babies to decrease vertical HIV-1 transmission in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet 1999;354:803-809
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  41. 41

    Moatti JP, N'Doye I, Hammer SM, Hale P, Kazatchkine M. Antiretroviral treatment for HIV infection in developing countries: an attainable new paradigm. Nat Med 2003;9:1449-1452
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  42. 42

    Marseille E, Hofmann PB, Kahn JG. HIV prevention before HAART in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet 2002;359:1851-1856
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  43. 43

    Cleary S, Boulle A, McIntyre D, Coetzee D. Cost-effectiveness of antiretroviral treatment for HIV-positive adults in a South African township. Durban, South Africa: Health Systems Trust, 2004.

  44. 44

    Salomon JA, Hogan DR, Stover J, et al. Integrating HIV prevention and treatment: from slogans to impact. PLoS Med 2005;2:e16-e16
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  45. 45

    Forsythe SS. The affordability of antiretroviral therapy in developing countries: what policymakers need to know. AIDS 1998;12:Suppl 2:S11-S18
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  46. 46

    Wright JC, Weinstein MC. Gains in life expectancy from medical interventions -- standardizing data on outcomes. N Engl J Med 1998;339:380-386
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  47. 47

    Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.

  48. 48

    Murray CJ, Lauer JA, Hutubessy RC, et al. Effectiveness and costs of interventions to lower systolic blood pressure and cholesterol: a global and regional analysis on reduction of cardiovascular-disease risk. Lancet 2003;361:717-725
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  49. 49

    Farmer P, Leandre F, Mukherjee JS, et al. Community-based approaches to HIV treatment in resource-poor settings. Lancet 2001;358:404-409
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  50. 50

    Aseffa A, Gedlu E, Asmelash T. Antibiotic resistance of prevalent Salmonella and Shigella strains in northwest Ethiopia. East Afr Med J 1997;74:708-713
    Web of Science | Medline

  51. 51

    Sow AI, Faye Niang MA, Dieng M, et al. Sensitivity to cotrimoxazole of bacteria isolated at the Central University Hospital of Fann, Dakar. Dakar Med 1999;44:20-24
    Medline

  52. 52

    Matheron S, Damond F, Benard A, et al. CD4 cell recovery in treated HIV-2-infected adults is lower than expected: results from the French ANRS CO5 HIV-2 cohort. AIDS 2006;20:459-462
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  53. 53

    Matheron S, Pueyo S, Damond F, et al. Factors associated with clinical progression in HIV-2 infected-patients: the French ANRS cohort. AIDS 2003;17:2593-2601
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  54. 54

    Mermin J, Lule J, Ekwaru JP, et al. Effect of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis on morbidity, mortality, CD4-cell count, and viral load in HIV infection in rural Uganda. Lancet 2004;364:1428-1434
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  55. 55

    van Oosterhout JJ, Laufer MK, Graham SM, et al. A community-based study of the incidence of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-preventable infections in Malawian adults living with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005;39:626-631
    Web of Science | Medline

  56. 56

    Evans DB, Edejer TT, Adam T, Lim SS. Methods to assess the costs and health effects of interventions for improving health in developing countries. BMJ 2005;331:1137-1140
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  57. 57

    Musgrove P, Fox-Rushby J. Cost-effectiveness analysis for priority setting. In: Jamison DT, ed. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006:271-86.

  58. 58

    WHO-CHOICE. Prices for hospitals and health centres. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006. (Accessed August 18, 2006, at http://www3.who.int/whosis/cea/prices/unit.cfm?path=evidence,cea,cea_prices,cea_prices_unit&language=English.)

  59. 59

    Johns B, Torres TT. Costs of scaling up health interventions: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan 2005;20:1-13
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  60. 60

    Goldie SJ, Gaffikin L, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2158-2168
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (80)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Anthony D. Harries, Simon D. Makombe, Erik J. Schouten, Andreas Jahn, Edwin Libamba, Kelita Kamoto, Frank Chimbwandira. (2011) How operational research influenced the scale up of antiretroviral therapy in Malawi. Health Care Management Science
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Laurent Bélec, Jean-Paul Bonn. (2011) Challenges in implementing HIV laboratory monitoring in resource-constrained settings: how to do more with less. Future Microbiology 6:11, 1251-1260
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Kit N. Simpson, Robert W. Baran, Stephanie E. Kirbach, Birgitta Dietz. (2011) Economics of Switching to Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy with Lopinavir/Ritonavir in Africa: Estimates Based on DART Trial Results and Costs for Uganda and Kenya. Value in Health
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Antonio Javier Blasco, José Ramón Arribas, Bonaventura Clotet, Pere Domingo, Juan González-García, Juan Carlos López-Bernaldo, Josep M. Llibre, Fernando Lozano, Daniel Podzamczer, Juan Miguel Santamaría, Montserrat Tuset, Laura Zamora, Pablo Lázaro, Josep M. Gatell. (2011) Análisis de costes y de coste/eficacia de las pautas preferentes de GESIDA para el tratamiento antirretroviral inicial. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Nicolas A. Menzies, Andres A. Berruti, Richard Berzon, Scott Filler, Robert Ferris, Tedd V. Ellerbrock, John M. Blandford. (2011) The cost of providing comprehensive HIV treatment in PEPFAR-supported programs. AIDS 25:14, 1753-1760
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Pamela K. Kohler, Michael H. Chung, Christine J. McGrath, Sarah F. Benki-Nugent, Joan W. Thiga, Grace C. John-Stewart. (2011) Implementation of free cotrimoxazole prophylaxis improves clinic retention among antiretroviral therapy-ineligible clients in Kenya. AIDS 25:13, 1657-1661
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    J. B. Babigumira, A. Levin, C. Burgess, L. P. Garrison, C. T. Bauch, F. Braka, W. B. Mbabazi, J. O. Nabyonga, E. Simons, A. Dabbagh. (2011) Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Measles Elimination in Uganda: Local Impact of a Global Eradication Program. Journal of Infectious Diseases 204:Supplement 1, S116-S123
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Eva A. Enns, Margaret L. Brandeau. (2011) Inferring model parameters in network-based disease simulation. Health Care Management Science 14:2, 174-188
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Elisabeth D. Riviello, Stephen Letchford, Loice Achieng, Mark W. Newton. (2011) Critical care in resource-poor settings: Lessons learned and future directions*. Critical Care Medicine 39:4, 860-867
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Valentina Cambiano, Andrew N Phillips. (2011) Modelling the impact of treatment with individual antiretrovirals. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 6:2, 124-130
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    A Sarah Walker, Diana M Gibb. (2011) Monitoring of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV infection. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 24:1, 27-33
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Andrea L Ciaranello, Shahin Lockman, Kenneth A Freedberg, Michael Hughes, Jennifer Chu, Judith Currier, Robin Wood, Charles B Holmes, Sandy Pillay, Francesca Conradie, James McIntyre, Elena Losina, Rochelle P Walensky. (2011) First-line antiretroviral therapy after single-dose nevirapine exposure in South Africa: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the OCTANE trial. AIDS 25:4, 479-492
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Sophie Desmonde, Patrick Coffie, Edmond Aka, Clarisse Amani-Bosse, Eugène Messou, François Dabis, Ahmadou Alioum, Andrea Ciaranello, Valériane Leroy. (2011) Severe morbidity and mortality in untreated HIV-infected children in a paediatric care programme in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, 2004-2009. BMC Infectious Diseases 11:1, 182
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    R Scott Braithwaite, Kimberly A Nucifora, Constantin T Yiannoutsos, Beverly Musick, Sylvester Kimaiyo, Lameck Diero, Melanie C Bacon, Kara Wools-Kaloustian. (2011) Alternative antiretroviral monitoring strategies for HIV-infected patients in east Africa: opportunities to save more lives?. Journal of the International AIDS Society 14:1, 38
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Jennifer Chu, Caroline E Sloan, Kenneth A Freedberg, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Elena Losina. (2011) Drug efficacy by direct and adjusted indirect comparison to placebo: An illustration by Mycobacterium avium complex prophylaxis in HIV. AIDS Research and Therapy 8:1, 14
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    John Stover, Lori Bollinger, Carlos Avila. (2011) Estimating the Impact and Cost of the WHO 2010 Recommendations for Antiretroviral Therapy. AIDS Research and Treatment 2011, 1-7
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Nicole G. Campos, Jane J. Kim, Philip E. Castle, Jesse D. Ortendahl, Meredith O'Shea, Mireia Diaz, Sue J. Goldie. (2011) Health and economic impact of HPV 16/18 vaccination and cervical cancer screening in Eastern Africa. International Journal of Cancern/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Charlotte Huet, Abdoulaye Ouedraogo, Issouf Konaté, Isidore Traore, François Rouet, Antoinette Kaboré, Anselme Sanon, Philippe Mayaud, Philippe Van de Perre, Nicolas Nagot. (2011) Long term virological, immunological and mortality outcomes in a cohort of HIV-infected female sex workers treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy in Africa. BMC Public Health 11:1, 700
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Rochelle P Walensky, Robin Wood, Mariam O Fofana, Neil A Martinson, Elena Losina, Michael D April, Ingrid V Bassett, Bethany L Morris, Kenneth A Freedberg, A David Paltiel. (2011) The Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Routine, Voluntary HIV Screening in South Africa. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 56:1, 26-35
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Rachel Kyeyune, Saskia den Boon, Adithya Cattamanchi, J Lucian Davis, William Worodria, Samuel D Yoo, Laurence Huang. (2010) Causes of Early Mortality in HIV-Infected TB Suspects in an East African Referral Hospital. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 55:4, 446-450
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    A. Reddi, S. C. Leeper. (2010) AIDS Funds: Benefits. Science 330:6001, 175-176
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    S. Loubiere, J.-P. Moatti. (2010) Economic evaluation of point-of-care diagnostic technologies for infectious diseases. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 16:8, 1070-1076
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Kartik K Venkatesh, Mark N Lurie, Kenneth H Mayer. (2010) How HIV treatment could result in effective prevention. Future Virology 5:4, 405-415
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Eugene Athan, Daniel P OʼBrien, Rosa Legood. (2010) Cost-effectiveness of routine and low-cost CD4 T-cell count compared with WHO clinical staging of HIV to guide initiation of antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings. AIDS 24:12, 1887-1895
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    April D Kimmel, Milton C Weinstein, Xavier Anglaret, Sue J Goldie, Elena Losina, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Eugène Messou, Kara L Cotich, Rochelle P Walensky, Kenneth A Freedberg. (2010) Laboratory Monitoring to Guide Switching Antiretroviral Therapy in Resource-Limited Settings: Clinical Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 54:3, 258-268
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Kit N Simpson. (2010) Economic modeling of HIV treatments. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 5:3, 242-248
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Anthony D Harries, Rony Zachariah, Elizabeth L Corbett, Stephen D Lawn, Ezio T Santos-Filho, Rhehab Chimzizi, Mark Harrington, Dermot Maher, Brian G Williams, Kevin M De Cock. (2010) The HIV-associated tuberculosis epidemic—when will we act?. The Lancet 375:9729, 1906-1919
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Sandrine Loubiere, Constance Meiners, Caroline Sloan, Kenneth A Freedberg, Yazdan Yazdanpanah. (2010) Economic evaluation of ART in resource-limited countries. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 5:3, 225-231
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Anand A Date, Marco Vitoria, Reuben Granich, Mazuwa Banda, Mayada Youssef Fox, Charlie Gilks. (2010) Implementation of co-trimoxazole prophylaxis and isoniazid preventive therapy for people living with HIV. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 88:4, 253-259
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Marinus Van Hulst, Gijs A.A. Hubben, Kwamena W.C. Sagoe, Charupon Promwong, Parichart Permpikul, Ladda Fongsatitkul, Diarmuid M. Glynn, Cees T. Smit Sibinga, Maarten J. Postma. (2009) BLOOD DONORS AND BLOOD COLLECTION: Web interface-supported transmission risk assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis of postdonation screening: a global model applied to Ghana, Thailand, and the Netherlands. Transfusion 49:12, 2729-2742
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Joseph B. Babigumira, Ajay K. Sethi, Kathleen A. Smyth, Mendel E. Singer. (2009) Cost Effectiveness of Facility-Based Care, Home-Based Care and Mobile Clinics for Provision of Antiretroviral Therapy in Uganda. PharmacoEconomics 27:11, 963-973
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Marc Bulterys, Catherine M Wilfert. (2009) HAART during pregnancy and during breastfeeding among HIV-infected women in the developing world: has the time come?. AIDS 23:18, 2473-2477
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Ishani Ganguli, Ingrid V. Bassett, Krista L. Dong, Rochelle P. Walensky. (2009) Home testing for HIV infection in resource-limited settings. Current HIV/AIDS Reports 6:4, 217-223
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Eran Bendavid, Robin Wood, David A Katzenstein, Ahmed M Bayoumi, Douglas K Owens. (2009) Expanding Antiretroviral Options in Resource-Limited Settings-A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 52:1, 106-113
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Joel Negin, James Wariero, Patrick Mutuo, Stephen Jan, Paul Pronyk. (2009) Feasibility, acceptability and cost of home-based HIV testing in rural Kenya. Tropical Medicine & International Health 14:8, 849-855
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Maria Cristina Marazzi, Karin Nielsen-Saines, Ersilia Buonomo, Paola Scarcella, Paola Germano, Nuria Abdul Majid, Ines Zimba, Susanna Ceffa, Leonardo Palombi. (2009) Increased Infant Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Type One Free Survival at One Year of Age in Sub-Saharan Africa With Maternal Use of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy During Breast-Feeding. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 28:6, 483-487
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Jean-Pierre Allain, Ohene Opare-Sem, Francis Sarkodie, Rabiatu Rahman, Shirley Owusu-Ofori. (2009) Deferred donor care in a regional hospital blood center in Ghana. Transfusion 49:4, 669-675
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Till Bärnighausen, David E. Bloom. (2009) “Conditional scholarships” for HIV/AIDS health workers: Educating and retaining the workforce to provide antiretroviral treatment in sub-Saharan Africa. Social Science & Medicine 68:3, 544-551
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Timothy J. Wilkin, Roy M. Gulick. (2008) HIV/AIDS: When to Start Antiretroviral Therapy?. Clinical Infectious Diseases 47:12, 1580-1586
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Pride Chigwedere, George R Seage, Sofia Gruskin, Tun-Hou Lee, M Essex. (2008) Estimating the Lost Benefits of Antiretroviral Drug Use in South Africa. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 49:4, 410-415
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    X. Anglaret. (2008) VIH/sida dans le monde : de l’épidémiologie au traitement universel. La Revue de Médecine Interne 29, S269-S273
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Stephen D Lawn, Anthony D Harries, Xavier Anglaret, Landon Myer, Robin Wood. (2008) Early mortality among adults accessing antiretroviral treatment programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS 22:15, 1897-1908
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    David P Wilson, Paul M Coplan. (2008) Mathematical models and health economic aspects of microbicides. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 3:5, 587-592
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Marinus van Hulst, Kwamena W.C. Sagoe, Jacobien E. Vermande, Ido P. van der Schaaf, Willem P.A. van der Tuuk Adriani, Kwasi Torpey, Justina Ansah, Julius A.A. Mingle, Cees Th. Smit Sibinga, Maarten J. Postma. (2008) Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening of Blood Donations in Accra (Ghana). Value in Health 11:5, 809-819
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Sydney Rosen, Lawrence Long, Ian Sanne. (2008) The outcomes and outpatient costs of different models of antiretroviral treatment delivery in South Africa. Tropical Medicine & International Health 13:8, 1005-1015
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Debrework Zewdie, Pedro Cahn, Craig McClure, Jacqueline Bataringaya. (2008) The role of HIV research in building health system capacity in developing countries. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 3:4, 481-488
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Jean Paul Moatti, Richard Marlink, Stephane Luchini, Michel Kazatchkine. (2008) Universal access to HIV treatment in developing countries: going beyond the misinterpretations of the ‘cost-effectiveness’ algorithm. AIDS 22:Suppl 1, S59-S66
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Andrew N Phillips, Deenan Pillay, Alec Miners, Charles F Gilks, Jens D Lundgren. (2008) Monitoring of antiretroviral therapy in low-resource settings – Authors' reply. The Lancet 372:9635, 289
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Rochelle P Walensky, Kenneth A Freedberg, Milton C Weinstein. (2008) Monitoring of antiretroviral therapy in low-resource settings. The Lancet 372:9635, 288
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Judd L Walson, Benson O Singa, Grace John-Stewart. (2008) Back to the basics: deworming HIV-1-infected individuals. Future HIV Therapy 2:4, 309-311
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Joshua A Salomon, Daniel R Hogan. (2008) Evaluating the impact of antiretroviral therapy on HIV transmission. AIDS 22:Suppl 1, S149-S159
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Susan M Cleary, Di McIntyre, Andrew M Boulle. (2008) Assessing efficiency and costs of scaling up HIV treatment. AIDS 22:Suppl 1, S35-S42
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Davey M. Smith, Robert T. Schooley. (2008) Running with Scissors: Using Antiretroviral Therapy without Monitoring Viral Load. Clinical Infectious Diseases 46:10, 1598-1600
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Rochelle P. Walensky, Robin Wood, Milton C. Weinstein, Neil A. Martinson, Elena Losina, Mariam O. Fofana, Sue J. Goldie, Nomita Divi, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Bingxia Wang, A. David Paltiel, Kenneth A. Freedberg, . (2008) Scaling Up Antiretroviral Therapy in South Africa: The Impact of Speed on Survival. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 197:9, 1324-1332
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Andrew N Phillips, Deenan Pillay, Alec H Miners, Diane E Bennett, Charles F Gilks, Jens D Lundgren. (2008) Outcomes from monitoring of patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings with viral load, CD4 cell count, or clinical observation alone: a computer simulation model. The Lancet 371:9622, 1443-1451
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Maria Cristina Marazzi, Giuseppe Liotta, Paola Germano, Giovanni Guidotti, A. Doro Altan, Susanna Ceffa, Massimo Magnano San Lio, Karin Nielsen-Saines, Leonardo Palombi. (2008) Excessive Early Mortality in the First Year of Treatment in HIV Type 1-Infected Patients Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy in Resource-Limited Settings. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses 24:4, 555-560
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Siaka Toure, Bertin Kouadio, Catherine Seyler, Moussa Traore, Nicole Dakoury-Dogbo, Julien Duvignac, Nafissatou Diakite, Sophie Karcher, Christophe Grundmann, Richard Marlink, François Dabis, Xavier Anglaret. (2008) Rapid scaling-up of antiretroviral therapy in 10 000 adults in Côte dʼIvoire: 2-year outcomes and determinants. AIDS 22:7, 873-882
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Máirín Ryan, Susan Griffin, Bona Chitah, A Sarah Walker, Veronica Mulenga, Donald Kalolo, Neil Hawkins, Concepta Merry, Michael G Barry, Chifumbe Chintu, Mark J Sculpher, Diana M Gibb. (2008) The cost-effectiveness of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in HIV-infected children in Zambia. AIDS 22:6, 749-757
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Philippe Msellati, Jean-Paul Moatti. (2008) Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for African HIV-infected children: no more delays, no more misinterpretations!. AIDS 22:6, 781-783
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    J. Robays, M. E. Raguenaud, T. Josenando, M. Boelaert. (2008) Eflornithine is a cost-effective alternative to melarsoprol for the treatment of second-stage human West African trypanosomiasis in Caxito, Angola. Tropical Medicine & International Health 13:2, 265-271
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Bala S. Manian. (2008) Affordable diagnostics-Changing the paradigm in India. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry 74B:S1, S117-S122
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Mendel E Singer. (2008) Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. PharmacoEconomics 26:5, 359-361
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    George Janossy, Howard Shapiro. (2008) Simplified cytometry for routine monitoring of infectious diseases. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry 74B:S1, S6-S10
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Lisa R. Hirschhorn, Bisola Ojikutu, William Rodriguez. (2007) Research for Change: Using Implementation Research to Strengthen HIV Care and Treatment Scale‐Up in Resource‐Limited Settings. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 196:s3, S516-S522
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Lindsey L Wolf, Paul Ricketts, Kenneth A Freedberg, Hazel Williams-Roberts, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Kathleen Allen-Ferdinand, William R Rodriguez, Nomita Divi, Michael T Wong, Elena Losina. (2007) The Cost-Effectiveness of Antiretroviral Therapy for Treating HIV Disease in the Caribbean. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 46:4, 463-471
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Nuala McGrath, Katharina Kranzer, Jacqueline Saul, Amelia C Crampin, Simon Malema, Lackson Kachiwanda, Basia Żaba, Andreas Jahn, Paul EM Fine, Judith R Glynn. (2007) Estimating the need for antiretroviral treatment and an assessment of a simplified HIV/AIDS case definition in rural Malawi. AIDS 21:Suppl 6, S105-S113
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Renée J. Goldberg Arnold. (2007) Cost-effectiveness analysis: should it be required for drug registration and beyond?. Drug Discovery Today 12:21-22, 960-965
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    H. J. Ribaudo. (2007) Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation to Inform Clinical Trial Design. Clinical Infectious Diseases 45:8, 1071-1073
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Ingrid V Bassett, Janet Giddy, Jacques Nkera, Bingxia Wang, Elena Losina, Zhigang Lu, Kenneth A Freedberg, Rochelle P Walensky. (2007) Routine Voluntary HIV Testing in Durban, South Africa. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 46:2, 181-186
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Debrework Zewdie, Kevin De Cock, Peter Piot. (2007) Sustaining treatment costs: who will pay?. AIDS 21:Suppl 4, S1-S4
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Kenneth A Freedberg, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, Elena Losina, Anitha J Cecelia, Callie A Scott, Nomita Divi, Timothy P Flanigan, Zhigang Lu, Milton C Weinstein, Bingxia Wang, Aylur K Ganesh, Melissa A Bender, Kenneth H Mayer, Rochelle P Walensky. (2007) Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy in India: starting criteria and second-line therapy. AIDS 21:Suppl 4, S117-S128
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Gary M Cohen. (2007) Access to diagnostics in support of HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis treatment in developing countries. AIDS 21:Suppl 4, S81-S87
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Leonardo Palombi, Maria Cristina Marazzi, Albertus Voetberg, N Abdul Magid. (2007) Treatment acceleration program and the experience of the DREAM program in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. AIDS 21:Suppl 4, S65-S71
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Mead Over, Ana Revenga, Emiko Masaki, Wiwat Peerapatanapokin, Julian Gold, Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Sombat Thanprasertsuk. (2007) The economics of effective AIDS treatment in Thailand. AIDS 21:Suppl 4, S105-S116
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    David Bishai, Arantxa Colchero, David T Durack. (2007) The cost effectiveness of antiretroviral treatment strategies in resource-limited settings. AIDS 21:10, 1333-1340
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Catherine Seyler, Christiane Adjé-Touré, Eugène Messou, Nicole Dakoury-Dogbo, François Rouet, Delphine Gabillard, Monica Nolan, Siaka Toure, Xavier Anglaret. (2007) Impact of genotypic drug resistance mutations on clinical and immunological outcomes in HIV-infected adults on HAART in West Africa. AIDS 21:9, 1157-1164
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Rochelle P Walensky, Milton C Weinstein, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Elena Losina, Lauren M Mercincavage, Siaka Touré, Nomita Divi, Xavier Anglaret, Sue J Goldie, Kenneth A Freedberg. (2007) HIV drug resistance surveillance for prioritizing treatment in resource-limited settings. AIDS 21:8, 973-982
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Anna K. Person, Habib O. Ramadhani, Nathan M. Thielman. (2007) Antiretroviral treatment strategies in resource-limited settings. Current HIV/AIDS Reports 4:2, 73-79
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Robert T. Schooley. (2007) Editorial Commentary: Viral Load Testing in Resource‐Limited Settings. Clinical Infectious Diseases 44:1, 139-140
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Reto Nüesch, Bernhard Hirschel. (2007) Treatment interruption for convenience, cost cutting and toxicity sparing. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 2:1, 31-38
    CrossRef