Special Article
Disciplinary Action by Medical Boards and Prior Behavior in Medical School
N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2673-2682December 22, 2005
- Abstract
Background
Evidence supporting professionalism as a critical measure of competence in medical education is limited. In this case–control study, we investigated the association of disciplinary action against practicing physicians with prior unprofessional behavior in medical school. We also examined the specific types of behavior that are most predictive of disciplinary action against practicing physicians with unprofessional behavior in medical school.
Methods
The study included 235 graduates of three medical schools who were disciplined by one of 40 state medical boards between 1990 and 2003 (case physicians). The 469 control physicians were matched with the case physicians according to medical school and graduation year. Predictor variables from medical school included the presence or absence of narratives describing unprofessional behavior, grades, standardized-test scores, and demographic characteristics. Narratives were assigned an overall rating for unprofessional behavior. Those that met the threshold for unprofessional behavior were further classified among eight types of behavior and assigned a severity rating (moderate to severe).
Results
Disciplinary action by a medical board was strongly associated with prior unprofessional behavior in medical school (odds ratio, 3.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 4.8), for a population attributable risk of disciplinary action of 26 percent. The types of unprofessional behavior most strongly linked with disciplinary action were severe irresponsibility (odds ratio, 8.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 40.1) and severely diminished capacity for self-improvement (odds ratio, 3.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 8.2). Disciplinary action by a medical board was also associated with low scores on the Medical College Admission Test and poor grades in the first two years of medical school (1 percent and 7 percent population attributable risk, respectively), but the association with these variables was less strong than that with unprofessional behavior.
Conclusions
In this case–control study, disciplinary action among practicing physicians by medical boards was strongly associated with unprofessional behavior in medical school. Students with the strongest association were those who were described as irresponsible or as having diminished ability to improve their behavior. Professionalism should have a central role in medical academics and throughout one's medical career.
Media in This Article
Table 1
Description of the 740 Violations among 235 Physicians That Led to Disciplinary Action on the Part of 40 State Medical Boards.Table 2
Demographic Characteristics and Measures of Academic Performance for the 704 Physicians from the Three Medical Schools.Article Activity
- Article
The importance of professionalism in medical school is receiving renewed attention.1-6 A fundamental assumption in medical education is that professional students become professional physicians. However, the data to support this assumption are limited.2
In a pilot study of physician graduates of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), we found that disciplinary action taken against physicians by the Medical Board of California was associated with prior unprofessional behavior when the physicians were students.7 We also identified three types of unprofessional behavior that were of particular concern: irresponsibility, diminished capacity for self-improvement, and poor initiative.8 We undertook this case–control study, involving three medical schools, to determine whether these findings could be generalized to all medical students and state medical boards.
Methods
Selection of Physicians Who Were Disciplined
The physicians who had been disciplined were graduates of three medical schools since 1970: the University of Michigan Medical School in Ann Arbor, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, and UCSF School of Medicine. These schools were chosen for reasons of geographic diversity and to provide representation of both public and private institutions. In addition, complete records for their graduates were available. The physicians from the University of Michigan and Jefferson Medical College included all graduates disciplined by any state medical board in the United States between 1990 and 2003. The physicians from UCSF included all graduates disciplined by any state board other than the Medical Board of California during the same period. UCSF graduates disciplined by the Medical Board of California were excluded from this study, because they had been described previously.7
All physicians were identified through a search of public records maintained in databases by the Federation of State Medical Boards. The disciplinary actions taken against physicians are available to the public9-13 according to individual state laws. The disciplinary actions range from public reprimand to revocation of the medical license. According to the Federation of State Medical Boards, even behavior that results in the least severe disciplinary action — public reprimand — may adversely affect patients.13 Three persons, two of whom were staff members at the Federation of State Medical Boards, classified the disciplinary actions of the state boards into three categories: unprofessional behavior, incompetence, and violation with the category not determined.
Selection of Control Physicians
In the analysis, each physician who was disciplined was paired with two control physicians who had graduated within one year of the disciplined physician and for whom no disciplinary actions were recorded in the database of the Federation of State Medical Boards. In the pilot study, the reports of unprofessional behavior among the control physicians differed among medical specialties.7 To control for specialty in this study, the specialty of one of the two control physicians was matched to that of the disciplined physician. Information regarding specialties was obtained from the American Medical Association masterfile14 and the database of the American Board of Medical Specialties.
Measurements
The graduates' academic records from their medical schools contained applications for admission, course grades, evaluation narratives, scores from licensing examinations, administrative correspondence, and the dean's letter of recommendation to a residency program. Research assistants and academic investigators for this study gathered the data from these records while blinded to the case or control status of the physicians.
Negative excerpts about professional behavior were culled from reports of admission interviews, course evaluations (including check marks in designated boxes on rating forms and narrative comments), deans' letters of recommendation to residency programs, and any documents in the students' files dated before graduation. The course-evaluation forms contained items intended to capture the entirety of professional behavior.
Overall Unprofessional Rating
The excerpts containing information about unprofessional behavior were compiled and assigned a severity rating for such behavior by at least two investigators. The definition of unprofessional behavior was based on our previously established criteria.15,16 The rating scale for unprofessional behavior included the five categories evaluated in the UCSF pilot study: none, trace, concern, problem, and extreme.7 An a priori decision was made that the ratings would be dichotomized, with the categories of concern, problem, and extreme meeting the threshold of unprofessional behavior. The investigators who assigned ratings could refer back to the academic file to provide a context for the excerpts. In the ratings of the negative excerpts, the interobserver agreement was 91 percent; the interobserver correlation was 95 percent for severity ratings of none or trace as compared with concern, problem, or extreme. Consensus was reached on all discordant rankings.
Types of Unprofessional Behavior
An analysis of the content of the negative excerpts was performed to characterize the types of behavior that were deemed unprofessional. The items from the UCSF Professionalism Evaluation Form and from our pilot study were used to develop a set of software-related search terms (with the use of QSR NVivo software, version 2.0) for eight types of unprofessional behavior.8,15,16 Two of the academic investigators reviewed all comments coded by the software; search terms were either added or removed by consensus. An NVivo listing of the total number of search terms per type of behavior per physician was uploaded into an SPSS statistical program. The severity of unprofessional behavior was ranked on the basis of the frequency of the search terms (none = 0; one or two times = moderate; three or more times = severe).
Other Predictor Variables
Other variables included age, sex, undergraduate grade-point average (GPA) for science courses, scores on the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT), grades for medical school courses and clerkships, and scores on the examination of the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME), Part I, or on the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), Step 1.
The scaled scores that were based on different versions of the MCAT were transformed to z scores with the use of the means and standard deviations for each subtest of each version of the MCAT. The mean z score of the subtests for each student was used as the independent variable. For students who repeated the MCAT, the mean of the first two scores was used.17 The three medical schools used numerical, letter, and pass–fail grades. To standardize these measures, we dichotomized the grades on the basis of the inability to pass a course on the first attempt (as indicated by a number grade below 70 points, a letter grade of D or F, or a provisional nonpass or fail). Raw scaled scores from NBME Part I and USMLE Step 1 were changed to z scores with the use of the mean and standard deviation for the year in which the test was taken.
Statistical Analysis
The demographic characteristics of the disciplined and control physicians were analyzed with the use of the chi-square test for proportions. The associations of predictor variables with case and control status were first examined with the use of conditional logistic-regression models (SAS software, version 8) that adjusted only for specialty, as required by the sampling design.18 We then examined the association between the predictor variables and disciplinary action using unadjusted and adjusted conditional logistic-regression analyses. Variables in the multivariate model included sex, MCAT z scores, the number of medical-school courses not passed on the first attempt, the overall measure of unprofessional behavior, and the specialties of the physicians (categorized as internal medicine, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, or all other specialties).
We subsequently evaluated the eight types of unprofessional behavior as predictors of disciplinary action using unadjusted conditional logistic-regression analyses. These eight types of behavior (each categorized as 0, 1, or 2) then competed for inclusion in a conditional logistic-regression model that predicted the risk of disciplinary action. The two types of behavior found to be significant in the logistic-regression analysis and a third behavior that almost reached statistical significance replaced the variable for overall unprofessional behavior in a multivariate model that adjusted for all the variables listed above. We then repeated the multivariate conditional logistic-regression analysis and replaced the three types of behavior with their scores for severity of behavior (moderate or severe).
The proportion of disciplinary action that was attributable to a variable was calculated with the use of population attributable risk19 according to the following equation (with PAR denoting population attributable risk, Pd the proportion of the exposure in the cases and RR the adjusted relative risk): PAR=[Pd×(RR−1)]÷RR. Continuous variables (e.g., MCAT z scores) were dichotomized (as the proportion of cases in the bottom quartile vs. others). The frequency distribution of specialties represented by the physicians who had been disciplined was compared with that of the specialties of all graduates of the three medical schools, to determine whether the specialties were similarly distributed.
Evidence indicates that physicians who have been in practice for more than 20 years are at increased risk for disciplinary action.20,21 We investigated whether this was true in our study sample by dichotomizing the disciplined physicians according to the year of graduation — before 1980 and 1980 or later.
The institutional review boards of UCSF, the University of Michigan, and Jefferson Medical College approved this study, and none required informed consent from the graduates. The Federation of State Medical Boards approved and collaborated with the investigators of this study. To protect confidentiality, we did not list the number of disciplined physicians according to medical school, year of graduation, or state in which disciplinary actions occurred.
Results
Records for 235 of the 243 physicians who were disciplined and 469 of the 486 control physicians were available. Each of these 704 physicians graduated from one of the three medical schools between 1970 and 1999. One or more of 40 state medical boards disciplined the case physicians; unprofessional behavior was the basis for at least 74 percent of the violations (Table 1Table 1
Description of the 740 Violations among 235 Physicians That Led to Disciplinary Action on the Part of 40 State Medical Boards.). Most physicians who were disciplined committed multiple violations; for 94 percent of those who were disciplined, one or more violations involved unprofessional behavior.The disciplined physicians had a slightly lower mean undergraduate science GPA than did the control physicians (Table 2Table 2
Demographic Characteristics and Measures of Academic Performance for the 704 Physicians from the Three Medical Schools.). MCAT scores were also slightly lower among the disciplined physicians, as were NBME Part I scores and USMLE Step 1 scores. There was no difference in the findings for physicians who took the MCAT twice. Disciplined physicians were roughly twice as likely as control physicians not to have passed at least one course on the first attempt in both the preclinical and clinical years of medical school.Overall Unprofessional Behavior
Twice as high a proportion of disciplined physicians as of control physicians demonstrated unprofessional behavior in medical school (Table 3Table 3
Types of Unprofessional Behavior in Medical School and Association with Subsequent Disciplinary Action.). In unadjusted analyses, disciplined physicians were more likely than control physicians to display the following types of unprofessional behavior while in medical school: irresponsibility, diminished capacity for self-improvement, poor initiative, impaired relationships with students, residents, and faculty, impaired relationships with nurses, and unprofessional behavior associated with being anxious, insecure, or nervous.The multivariate analysis revealed three variables with regard to medical school that independently predicted disciplinary action. Unprofessional behavior was associated with an increase, by a factor of three, in the risk of subsequent disciplinary action, and it accounted for the largest population attributable risk (26 percent) (Table 4Table 4
Adjusted Analyses of Medical-School Predictors of Disciplinary Action among 235 Disciplined Physicians and 469 Control Physicians.). Low MCAT scores and low grades in the first two years of medical school were also significant predictors, with a population attributable risk of disciplinary action of 1 percent and 7 percent, respectively.Types of Unprofessional Behavior
We evaluated the types of unprofessional behavior and the frequency of their occurrence during medical school (Table 3). Examples of irresponsibility were unreliable attendance at clinic and not following up on activities related to patient care. Examples of diminished capacity for self-improvement were failure to accept constructive criticism, argumentativeness, and display of a poor attitude. Poor initiative was characterized by a lack of motivation or enthusiasm or by passivity.
Two types of unprofessional behavior independently predicted disciplinary action: irresponsibility and diminished capacity for self-improvement. The odds of receiving disciplinary action increased as the frequency of unprofessional behavior increased; students who were severely irresponsible (as indicated by three or more search terms) or who were described as severely unable to improve their behavior had odds ratios of 8.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 40.1) and 3.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 8.2), respectively, for subsequent disciplinary action. Unprofessional behavior associated with being anxious, insecure, or nervous (three or more search terms) approached statistical significance (P=0.06).
Other Analyses
The major predictor variable, overall unprofessional rating, remained significantly associated with disciplinary action when it was analyzed within subgroups. Disciplined physicians were compared with control physicians matched by specialty (odds ratio, 3.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 5.3) and with control physicians not matched by specialty (odds ratio, 3.1; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 5.8), as well as physicians stratified according to year of graduation — 1970 to 1979 (odds ratio, 2.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 5.2) and 1980 to 1999 (odds ratio, 3.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 7.7). Two variables (undergraduate science GPA and z scores on NBME Part I and USMLE Step 1) were deleted from the final model because these variables were missing for nearly 30 percent of the study subjects. Had the two variables remained in the final model, they would not have been associated with disciplinary action (odds ratio for undergraduate science GPA, 0.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 1.5; odds ratio for z scores on the NBME Part I and USMLE Step 1 board tests, 0.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.6 to 1.3). However, the association of the overall unprofessional rating with disciplinary action would have persisted (odds ratio, 5.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.6 to 10.1).
The comparison of the distribution of specialties among the disciplined physicians with that among the graduates of the three medical schools is shown in Table 5Table 5
Comparison of the Distribution of Specialties among the Disciplined Physicians with Those among All Graduates of the Three Medical Schools.. The specialties of family practice and obstetrics and gynecology were overrepresented among disciplined physicians, and pediatrics was underrepresented.The UCSF graduates who were disciplined outside of California and were subjects in this study were similar to the previously reported UCSF graduates who were disciplined within California7: chi-square analyses showed no difference between these two groups in terms of sex distribution (P=0.11), the frequency of unprofessional behavior (none or trace vs. concern, problem, or extreme; P=0.36), or distribution of specialties (P=0.17).
Discussion
In this case–control study, we found that physicians who were disciplined by state medical-licensing boards were three times as likely to have displayed unprofessional behavior in medical school than were control students. This association was observed among graduates of three geographically diverse medical schools, both public and private, and among 40 state licensing boards. Unprofessional behavior as a student was by far the strongest predictor of disciplinary action. Furthermore, the types of unprofessional behavior displayed by students were associated with subsequent disciplinary actions. Among students who were subsequently disciplined, the most irresponsible had a risk of later disciplinary action that was eight times as high as that for control students, and those who were the most resistant to self-improvement had a risk of later discipline that was three times as high as that for controls. Among students who were subsequently disciplined, students with low MCAT scores and those with low grades in the first two years of medical school were also at risk for future disciplinary action, but these were associated with, at most, only one quarter of the risk attributed to unprofessional behavior. Recent objectives for undergraduate and graduate medical education provided by the Association of American Medical Colleges and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education include professionalism as a core “competency.”22,23 Our study provides empirical support for its inclusion and also provides concrete data regarding what is meant by unprofessional behavior.
In previous studies, physicians practicing in the areas of obstetrics and gynecology, general practice, psychiatry, and family medicine were more likely to receive disciplinary action, and those practicing in pediatrics and radiology were less likely to be disciplined.20,21 The practices of internal medicine, surgery, and anesthesiology were not predictive of disciplinary action. In our study, similar patterns of discipline according to specialty were seen in five of the seven largest specialties (internal medicine, family practice, pediatrics, surgery, and obstetrics and gynecology); these patterns support the generalizability of our findings. In contrast to earlier studies, we did not find male sex to be a risk factor.20,21 Our study design precluded a full assessment of age as a risk factor for disciplinary action.
The maintenance of complete student files since 1970 on the part of the three medical schools included in this study afforded a unique opportunity for investigation. Nonetheless, the limitations of this study include its retrospective design and the absence of data, because of incomplete medical school files, for disciplined physicians who graduated before 1970. Also, there may have been additional types of unprofessional behavior in medical school that led to disciplinary action that can best be identified with the use of multidimensional assessments (360-degree multisource feedback — i.e., from peers, patients, and coworkers) of professional competency.24,25 The national rate of disciplinary action among the approximately 725,000 physicians practicing in the United States is 0.3 percent.13 Actions taken by state medical boards may reflect only the most extreme forms of unprofessional behavior. Despite this possibility, our study revealed a strong association between disciplinary action on the part of 40 state medical boards and unprofessional behavior among students.
What should be done with the findings of this study? Technical standards for admission to medical school and outcome objectives for graduation should be reviewed to make certain they contain explicit language about professional behavior. Standardized instruments should be implemented that assess the personal qualities of medical school applicants and that predict early medical school performance.26 Professionalism can and must be taught and modeled.5,27-29 Improved systems of evaluation are needed to monitor the development of professional behavior and to document deficiencies.30 Providing students with feedback that is guided by evidence may motivate and direct remediation strategies, but the best practices for the remediation of deficiencies in professional behavior need development.31,32
A recent study showed that medical students who lack thoroughness and are unable to perceive their weaknesses in the first two years of medical school are more likely than those who do not have these deficiencies to be identified as unprofessional in the clinical years.33 Our study extends this finding by demonstrating that, among some students, unprofessional behavior is sustained over decades. However, disciplinary action by state medical boards occurs much less frequently than does unprofessional behavior in medical school. Not only do these two assessments have different thresholds, but physicians are also likely to improve in terms of professionalism with training and experience.34 Our study supports the importance of identifying students who display unprofessional behavior. A prospective study looking at the later performance of these students could assess the effect of interventions on professional development.
Supported in part by an Edward J. Stemmler, M.D., Medical Education Research Fund grant from NBME. This study does not necessarily reflect NBME policy, and NBME support includes no official endorsement. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
We are indebted to Toni Conrad and Bonnie Hellevig for their assistance with data abstraction; to Amanda Gilbert at the Association of American Medical Colleges for providing national mean MCAT scores; to Dr. Rachel Glick for her assistance in the organization of the study; to Drs. Eric Vittinghoff, Michael Shlipak, and Gretchen Guiton for the statistical analyses; and to Drs. Robert Galbraith and Stephen Clyman of the NBME and Dr. James Thompson of the Federation of State Medical Boards for their support.
Source Information
From the School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (M.A.P., A.T., M.A.B.,); the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco (M.A.P.); the Federation of State Medical Boards, Dallas (T.R.K.); the Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia (S.L.R., J.J.V.); the University of Michigan Medical School, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor (D.T.S.); and the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver (C.S.H.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Papadakis at the University of California, San Francisco, S-245, Box 0454, San Francisco, CA 94143, or at papadakm@medsch.ucsf.edu.
- References
References
1
Arnold L . Assessing professional behavior: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad Med 2002;77:502-515
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline2
Stern DT, ed. Measuring medical professionalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
3
Veloski JJ ,Fields SK ,Boex JR ,Blank LL . Measuring professionalism: a review of studies with instruments reported in the literature between 1982 and 2002. Acad Med 2005;80:366-370
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline4
ABIM Foundation, ACP-ASIM Foundation, European Federation of Internal Medicine
Web of Science | Medline5
Cruess SR ,Johnston S ,Cruess RL . "Profession": a working definition for medical educators. Teach Learn Med 2004;16:74-76
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline6
Cohen JJ . Measuring professionalism: listening to our students. Acad Med 1999;74:1010-1010
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline7
Papadakis MA ,Hodgson CS ,Teherani A ,Kohatsu ND . Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med 2004;79:244-249
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline8
Teherani A ,Hodgson CS ,Banach M ,Papadakis MA . Domains of unprofessional behavior during medical school associated with future disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med 2005;80:Suppl:S17-S20
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline9
California Law. California Business and Professions Code, ch. 5, §§ 2227, 803.1, 2027: Sacramento: Legislative Counsel of California. (Accessed November 23, 2005, at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html.)
10
Michigan Department of Community Health. Michigan Public Health Code. P.A. 368 of 1978, as amended. (Accessed November 23, 2005, at http://www.michigan.gov/mdch/0,1607,7-132-27417_27529-43008---,00.html.)
11
Disciplinary actions: Pennsylvania Department of State. (Accessed November 23, 2005, at http://www.dos.state.pa.us/bpoa/cwp/view.asp?a=1104&Q=432631&bpoaNav=|.)
12
Federation of State Medical Boards. DocInfo: the premier physician disciplinary history report service. (Accessed November 23, 2005, at http://www.docinfo.org/.)
13
Federation of State Medical Boards. Summary of 2003 board actions. April 4, 2004. (Accessed November 23, 2005, at http://www.fsmb.org/pdf/FPDC_Summary_BoardActions_2003.pdf.)
14
American Medical Association physician masterfile. Chicago: American Medical Association, 2003, 2004.
15
Papadakis MA ,Osborn EH ,Cooke M ,Healy K . A strategy for the detection and evaluation of unprofessional behavior in medical students. Acad Med 1999;74:980-990
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline16
Papadakis MA ,Loeser H ,Healy K . Early detection and evaluation of professionalism deficiencies in medical students: one school's approach. Acad Med 2001;76:1100-1106
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline17
Hojat M ,Veloski JJ ,Zeleznik C . Predictive validity of the MCAT for students with two sets of scores. J Med Educ 1985;60:911-918
Medline18
Logistic regression for matched case-control studies. In: Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley, 1989:187-215.
19
Rockhill B ,Newman B ,Weinberg C . Use and misuse of population attributable fractions. Am J Public Health 1998;88:15-19
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline20
Kohatsu ND ,Gould D ,Ross LK ,Fox PJ . Characteristics associated with physician discipline: a case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:653-658
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline21
Morrison J ,Wickersham P . Physicians disciplined by a state medical board. JAMA 1998;279:1889-1893
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline22
Learning objectives for medical student education -- guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med 1999;74:13-18
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline23
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Outcome Project: general competencies. (Accessed November 23, 2005, at http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compFull.asp.)
24
Epstein RM ,Hundert EM . Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002;287:226-235
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline25
Ramsey PG ,Wenrich MD ,Carline JD ,Inui TS ,Larson EB ,LoGerfo JP . Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 1993;269:1655-1660
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline26
Eva KW ,Reiter HI ,Rosenfeld J ,Norman GR . The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict preclerkship performance in medical school. Acad Med 2004;79:Suppl:S40-S42
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline27
Learning and transfer. In: National Research Council. How people learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000:51-78.
28
Brufee KA. Collaborative learning: higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
29
Cruess SR ,Cruess RL . Professionalism must be taught. BMJ 1997;315:1674-1677
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline30
Dannefer EF ,Henson LC ,Bierer SB , et al. Peer assessment of professional competence. Med Educ 2005;39:713-722
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline31
National Research Council. How people learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000:49.
32
Glick TH . Evidence-guided education: patients' outcomes data should influence our teaching priorities. Acad Med 2005;80:147-151
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline33
Stern DT ,Frohna AZ ,Gruppen LD . The prediction of professional behaviour. Med Educ 2005;39:75-82
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline34
Ginsburg S ,Regehr G ,Hatala R , et al. Context, conflict, and resolution: a new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med 2000;75:Suppl:S6-S11
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
- Citing Articles (124)
Citing Articles
1
Debbie Hatfield, Jane Lovegrove. (2012) The use of skills inventories to assess and grade practice: Part 2 – Evaluation of assessment strategy. Nurse Education in Practice
CrossRef2
W Dale Dauphinee. (2012) Educators must consider patient outcomes when assessing the impact of clinical training. Medical Education 46:1, 13-20
CrossRef3
Pauline H. Go, Zachary Klaassen, Ronald S. Chamberlain. (2012) Attitudes and Practices of Surgery Residency Program Directors Toward the Use of Social Networking Profiles to Select Residency Candidates: A Nationwide Survey Analysis. Journal of Surgical Education
CrossRef4
Karen E. Wang, Caroline Fitzpatrick, David George, Lindsey Lane. (2012) Attitudes of Affiliate Faculty Members Toward Medical Student Summative Evaluation for Clinical Clerkships: A Qualitative Analysis. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 24:1, 8-17
CrossRef5
Frank J. Krings, J. Goedhuys. (2011) Focus op talentvolle studenten geneeskunde: waar letten praktijkopleiders op?. Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
CrossRef6
Carol R. Thrush, John J. Spollen, Sara G. Tariq, D. Keith Williams, Jeannette M. Shorey Ii. (2011) Evidence for validity of a survey to measure the learning environment for professionalism. Medical Teacher 33:12, e683-e688
CrossRef7
Harry C. Sax. (2011) Building High-Performance Teams in the Operating Room. Surgical Clinics of North America
CrossRef8
Wadeeah Bahaziq, Edward Crosby. (2011) Physician professional behaviour affects outcomes: A framework for teaching professionalism during anesthesia residency. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 58:11, 1039-1050
CrossRef9
Denham L. Phipps, Peter R. Noyce, Kieran Walshe, Dianne Parker, Darren M. Ashcroft. (2011) Pharmacists subjected to disciplinary action: characteristics and risk factors. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 19:5, 367-373
CrossRef10
Vinay Prasad. (2011) Are We Treating Professionalism Professionally? Medical School Behavior as Predictors of Future Outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 23:4, 337-341
CrossRef11
John J. Leddy, Geneviève Moineau, Derek Puddester, Timothy J. Wood, Susan Humphrey-Murto. (2011) Does an Emotional Intelligence Test Correlate With Traditional Measures Used to Determine Medical School Admission?. Academic Medicine 86, S39-S41
CrossRef12
S.J. Luijk, R.C. Gorter, W.N.K.A. Mook. (2011) Promoting professional behaviour in undergraduate medical, dental and veterinary curricula in the Netherlands: evaluation of a joint effort*. Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs 30:4, 152-161
CrossRef13
&NA;. (2011) Publication Misrepresentation Among Anesthesiology Residency Applicants. Survey of Anesthesiology 55:4, 169
CrossRef14
Camille DiLullo, Patricia McGee, Richard M. Kriebel. (2011) Demystifying the Millennial student: A reassessment in measures of character and engagement in professional education. Anatomical Sciences Education 4:4, 214-226
CrossRef15
James J. Brokaw, Laura J. Torbeck, Mary A. Bell, Dennis W. Deal. (2011) Impact of a Competency-Based Curriculum on Medical Student Advancement: A Ten-Year Analysis. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 23:3, 207-214
CrossRef16
Brian David Hodges, Shiphra Ginsburg, Richard Cruess, Sylvia Cruess, Rhena Delport, Fred Hafferty, Ming-Jung Ho, Eric Holmboe, Matthew Holtman, Sadayoshi Ohbu, Charlotte Rees, Olle Ten Cate, Yusuke Tsugawa, Walther Van Mook, Val Wass, Tim Wilkinson, Winnie Wade. (2011) Assessment of professionalism: Recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Medical Teacher 33:5, 354-363
CrossRef17
Catherine A. Marco, Dave W. Lu, Edward Stettner, Peter E. Sokolove, Jacob W. Ufberg, Thomas P. Noeller. (2011) Ethics Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 40:5, 550-556
CrossRef18
(2011) Letters to the Editor. Medical Teacher 33:5, 422-427
CrossRef19
Walther N. K. A. Mook, Arno M. M. Muijtjens, Simone L. Gorter, Jan Harm Zwaveling, Lambert W. Schuwirth, Cees P. M. Vleuten. (2011) Web-assisted assessment of professional behaviour in problem-based learning: more feedback, yet no qualitative improvement?. Advances in Health Sciences Education
CrossRef20
Debra L. Klamen, Peter T. Borgia. (2011) Can Studentsʼ Scores on Preclerkship Clinical Performance Examinations Predict That They Will Fail a Senior Clinical Performance Examination?. Academic Medicine 86:4, 516-520
CrossRef21
Richard M. Frankel, Florence Eddins-Folensbee, Thomas S. Inui. (2011) Crossing the Patient-Centered Divide: Transforming Health Care Quality Through Enhanced Faculty Development. Academic Medicine 86:4, 445-452
CrossRef22
JOANNE JONES, GARY SPRAAKMAN. (2011) A Case of Academic Misconduct: Does Self-Interest Rule?*. Accounting Perspectives 10:1, 1-22
CrossRef23
Stephanie A. Neuman, Timothy R. Long, Steven H. Rose. (2011) Publication Misrepresentation Among Anesthesiology Residency Applicants. Anesthesia & Analgesia 112:3, 674-677
CrossRef24
J. Guyaux, M.G.A. oude Egbrink, S. Heeneman, A.J.H.M. Houben, C. Willekes, L.W.T. Schuwirth, A.F.P.M. Goeij. (2011) Selectie op een combinatie van cognitieve en noncognitieve eigenschappen. Keuzes en ervaringen in de onderzoeksmaster Arts-Klinisch Onderzoeker (A-KO) te Maastricht. Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
CrossRef25
Eva M Doherty, Emmeline Nugent. (2011) Personality factors and medical training: a review of the literature. Medical Education 45:2, 132-140
CrossRef26
Lindsay A Thompson, Erik Black, W Patrick Duff, Nicole Paradise Black, Heidi Saliba, Kara Dawson. (2011) Protected Health Information on Social Networking Sites: Ethical and Legal Considerations. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13:1,
CrossRef27
Tim J Wilkinson, Mike J Tweed, Tony G Egan, Anthony N Ali, Jan M McKenzie, MaryLeigh Moore, Joy R Rudland. (2011) Joining the dots: Conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress. BMC Medical Education 11:1, 29
CrossRef28
Paul A Tiffin, Gabrielle M Finn, John C McLachlan. (2011) Evaluating professionalism in medical undergraduates using selected response questions: findings from an item response modelling study. BMC Medical Education 11:1, 43
CrossRef29
Catherine M. Kuhn. (2011) How to Avoid Recruiting the Problem Employee (and What to Do Once You Have One). ASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiology 39:1, 80-85
CrossRef30
Janet Yates. (2011) Development of a 'toolkit' to identify medical students at risk of failure to thrive on the course: an exploratory retrospective case study. BMC Medical Education 11:1, 95
CrossRef31
Paul A. Hemmer, Steven J. Durning, Klara Papp. (2010) What Are the Discussion Topics and Usefulness of Clerkship Directorsʼ Meetings Within Medical Schools? A Report From the CDIM 2007 National Survey. Academic Medicine 85:12, 1855-1861
CrossRef32
Patricia S O’Sullivan, Hugh A Stoddard, Summers Kalishman. (2010) Collaborative research in medical education: a discussion of theory and practice. Medical Education 44:12, 1175-1184
CrossRef33
C.P.M. van der Vleuten, L.W.T. Schuwirth, F. Scheele, E.W. Driessen, B. Hodges. (2010) The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 24:6, 703-719
CrossRef34
J.B. Prins, M.D. Nuijten. (2010) Ontwikkeling van een vragenlijst voor studenten geneeskunde: opvattingen over professioneel gedrag. Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs 2010:2, 117-125
CrossRef35
Douglas W. Laube. (2010) Physician Accountability and Taking Responsibility for Ourselves. Obstetrics & Gynecology 116:2, Part 1, 248-253
CrossRef36
David A. Cook, Dorothy A. Andriole, Steven J. Durning, Nicole K. Roberts, Marc M. Triola. (2010) Longitudinal Research Databases in Medical Education: Facilitating the Study of Educational Outcomes Over Time and Across Institutions. Academic Medicine 85:8, 1340-1346
CrossRef37
David A. Cook, Thomas J. Beckman. (2010) Reflections on experimental research in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education 15:3, 455-464
CrossRef38
Valerie P. Grignol, Alyssa Gans, Branyan A. Booth, Ronald Markert, Paula M. Termuhlen. (2010) Self-reported attitudes and behaviors of general surgery residents about ethical academic practices in test taking. Surgery 148:2, 178-180
CrossRef39
Marianne Green, Amanda Zick, John X. Thomas. (2010) Commentary: Accurate Medical Student Performance Evaluations and Professionalism Assessment: “Yes, We Can!”. Academic Medicine 85:7, 1105-1107
CrossRef40
Gordon F. Murray. (2010) “Though Medicine Can Be Learned, It Cannot Be Taught”—The First 100 Years: Flexnerian Competency 2010. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 90:1, 1-10
CrossRef41
Pier Bryden, Shiphra Ginsburg, Bochra Kurabi, Najma Ahmed. (2010) Professing Professionalism: Are We Our Own Worst Enemy? Faculty Membersʼ Experiences of Teaching and Evaluating Professionalism in Medical Education at One School. Academic Medicine 85:6, 1025-1034
CrossRef42
Arcadi Gual, Albert Oriol-Bosch, Helios Pardell. (2010) El médico del futuro. Medicina Clínica 134:8, 363-368
CrossRef43
John McLachlan. (2010) Measuring conscientiousness and professionalism in undergraduate medical students. The Clinical Teacher 7:1, 37-40
CrossRef44
Graham T. McMahon, Alfred F. Tallia. (2010) Perspective: Anticipating the Challenges of Reforming the United States Medical Licensing Examination. Academic Medicine 85:3, 453-456
CrossRef45
Walther N. K. A. Mook, Willem S. Grave, Simone L. Gorter, Arno M. M. Muijtjens, Jan Harm Zwaveling, Lambert W. Schuwirth, Cees P. M. Vleuten. (2010) Fellows’ in intensive care medicine views on professionalism and how they learn it. Intensive Care Medicine 36:2, 296-303
CrossRef46
Michael W. Rabow, Rachel N. Remen, Dean X. Parmelee, Thomas S. Inui. (2010) Professional Formation: Extending Medicineʼs Lineage of Service Into the Next Century. Academic Medicine 85:2, 310-317
CrossRef47
Anne C. Nofziger, Elizabeth H. Naumburg, Barbara J. Davis, Christopher J. Mooney, Ronald M. Epstein. (2010) Impact of Peer Assessment on the Professional Development of Medical Students: A Qualitative Study. Academic Medicine 85:1, 140-147
CrossRef48
Christopher L. Camp, Jeremy K. Gregory, Nirusha Lachman, Laura P. Chen, Justin E. Juskewitch, Wojciech Pawlina. (2010) Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student professionalism. Anatomical Sciences EducationNA-NA
CrossRef49
Kapil Sugand, Peter Abrahams, Ashish Khurana. (2010) The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anatomical Sciences EducationNA-NA
CrossRef50
Walther N.K.A. van Mook, Simone L. Gorter, Willem S. de Grave, Scheltus J. van Luijk, Helen O'Sullivan, Valerie Wass, Jan Harm Zwaveling, Lambert W. Schuwirth, Cees P.M. van der Vleuten. (2009) Professionalism beyond medical school: An educational continuum?. European Journal of Internal Medicine 20:8, e148-e152
CrossRef51
Karen E. Hauer, Andrea Ciccone, Thomas R. Henzel, Peter Katsufrakis, Stephen H. Miller, William A. Norcross, Maxine A. Papadakis, David M. Irby. (2009) Remediation of the Deficiencies of Physicians Across the Continuum From Medical School to Practice: A Thematic Review of the Literature. Academic Medicine 84:12, 1822-1832
CrossRef52
John E Tetzlaff. (2009) Assessment of competence in anesthesiology. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 22:6, 809-813
CrossRef53
Eric Siu, Harold I. Reiter. (2009) Overview: what’s worked and what hasn’t as a guide towards predictive admissions tool development. Advances in Health Sciences Education 14:5, 759-775
CrossRef54
Walther N.K.A. van Mook, Simone L. Gorter, Helen O'Sullivan, Valerie Wass, Lambert W. Schuwirth, Cees P.M. van der Vleuten. (2009) Approaches to professional behaviour assessment: Tools in the professionalism toolbox. European Journal of Internal Medicine 20:8, e153-e157
CrossRef55
Jeanne M. Sandella, William L. Roberts, Laurie A. Gallagher, John R. Gimpel, Erik E. Langenau, John R. Boulet. (2009) Patient Note Fabrication and Consequences of Unprofessional Behavior in a High-Stakes Clinical Skills Licensing Examination. Academic Medicine 84:Supplement, S70-S73
CrossRef56
Gabrielle Finn, Marina Sawdon, Laura Clipsham, John McLachlan. (2009) Peer estimation of lack of professionalism correlates with low Conscientiousness Index scores. Medical Education 43:10, 960-967
CrossRef57
Kelly L. Dore, Harold I. Reiter, Kevin W. Eva, Sharyn Krueger, Edward Scriven, Eric Siu, Shannon Hilsden, Jennifer Thomas, Geoffrey R. Norman. (2009) Extending the Interview to All Medical School Candidates—Computer-Based Multiple Sample Evaluation of Noncognitive Skills (CMSENS). Academic Medicine 84:Supplement, S9-S12
CrossRef58
John G. Frohna, Robert McGregor, Nancy Spector. (2009) Promoting Professionalism in Pediatrics. Academic Pediatrics 9:5, 295-297
CrossRef59
Walther N.K.A. van Mook, Scheltus J. van Luijk, Willem de Grave, Helen O'Sullivan, Valerie Wass, Lambert W. Schuwirth, Cees P.M. van der Vleuten. (2009) Teaching and learning professional behavior in practice. European Journal of Internal Medicine 20:5, e105-e111
CrossRef60
C. Ringsted. (2009) Research in medical education. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin 12:S2, 57-60
CrossRef61
Kevin W Eva, Harold I Reiter, Kien Trinh, Parveen Wasi, Jack Rosenfeld, Geoffrey R Norman. (2009) Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees. Medical Education 43:8, 767-775
CrossRef62
Yoon Kang, Charles Bardes, Linda Gerber, Carol Story-Johnson. (2009) Pilot of Direct Observation of Clinical Skills (DOCS) in a Medicine Clerkship:Feasibility and Relationship to Clinical Performance Measures. Medical Education Online 14,
CrossRef63
Pamela Lyss-Lerman, Arianne Teherani, Eva Aagaard, Helen Loeser, Molly Cooke, G Michael Harper. (2009) What Training Is Needed in the Fourth Year of Medical School? Views of Residency Program Directors. Academic Medicine 84:7, 823-829
CrossRef64
David Black, Jan Welch. (2009) The under-performing trainee - concerns and challenges for medical educators. The Clinical Teacher 6:2, 79-82
CrossRef65
William A. Shakespeare, Douglas R. Bacon, Dale C. Smith, Steven H. Rose. (2009) The Journal Club. Anesthesiology 110:6, 1214-1216
CrossRef66
John C. McLachlan, Gabrielle Finn, Jane Macnaughton. (2009) The Conscientiousness Index: A Novel Tool to Explore Students’ Professionalism. Academic Medicine 84:5, 559-565
CrossRef67
John E. Tetzlaff. (2009) Professionalism in Anesthesiology. Anesthesiology 110:4, 700-702
CrossRef68
Louis Pangaro, Lynne Cleary, Susan Cox. (2009) More About Struggling Students. Academic Medicine 84:2, 152
CrossRef69
Edward A. Luce. (2008) Discussion. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 122:6, 1940-1941
CrossRef70
Michael Ford, George Masterton, Helen Cameron, Fanney Kristmundsdottir. (2008) Supporting struggling medical students. The Clinical Teacher 5:4, 232-238
CrossRef71
Judy A. Shea, Elizabeth O’Grady, Barbara R. Wagner, Jon B. Morris, Gail Morrison. (2008) Professionalism in Clerkships: An Analysis of MSPE Commentary. Academic Medicine 83:Supplement, S1-S4
CrossRef72
Geoff Norman. (2008) The end of educational science?. Advances in Health Sciences Education 13:4, 385-389
CrossRef73
Louis Pangaro. (2008) “Forward Feeding” About Studentsʼ Progress: More Information Will Enable Better Policy. Academic Medicine 83:9, 802-803
CrossRef74
Paul Haidet, David S. Hatem, Mary Lynn Fecile, Howard F. Stein, Heather-Lyn A. Haley, Barbara Kimmel, David L. Mossbarger, Thomas S. Inui. (2008) The role of relationships in the professional formation of physicians: Case report and illustration of an elicitation technique. Patient Education and Counseling 72:3, 382-387
CrossRef75
Sandra L. Frellsen, Elizabeth A. Baker, Klara K. Papp, Steven J. Durning. (2008) Medical School Policies Regarding Struggling Medical Students During the Internal Medicine Clerkships: Results of a National Survey. Academic Medicine 83:9, 876-881
CrossRef76
(2008) On the case for an interview in medical student selection. Internal Medicine Journal 38:8, 621-623
CrossRef77
Jennifer A Cleland, Lynn V Knight, Charlotte E Rees, Susan Tracey, Christine M Bond. (2008) Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students. Medical Education 42:8, 800-809
CrossRef78
Malcolm Parker, Haida Luke, Jianzhen Zhang, D Wilkinson, Raymond Peterson, Ieva Ozolins. (2008) The ???Pyramid of Professionalism???: Seven Years of Experience With an Integrated Program of Teaching, Developing, and Assessing Professionalism Among Medical Students. Academic Medicine 83:8, 733-741
CrossRef79
Steven J. Durning, Daniel L. Cohen, David Cruess, John M. McManigle, Richard MacDonald. (2008) Does Student Promotions Committee Appearance Predict Below-Average Performance During Internship? A Seven-Year Study. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 20:3, 267-272
CrossRef80
Rachel Stark, Deborah Korenstein, Reena Karani. (2008) Impact of a 360-degree Professionalism Assessment on Faculty Comfort and Skills in Feedback Delivery. Journal of General Internal Medicine 23:7, 969-972
CrossRef81
Jennifer A Cleland, Andrew Milne, Hazel Sinclair, Amanda J Lee. (2008) Cohort study on predicting grades: is performance on early MBChB assessments predictive of later undergraduate grades?. Medical Education 42:7, 676-683
CrossRef82
Karen E. Adams, Sandra Emmons, Jillian Romm. (2008) How resident unprofessional behavior is identified and managed: a program director survey. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 198:6, 692.e1-692.e5
CrossRef83
Paul A. Hemmer, Klara K. Papp, Alex J. Mechaber, Steven J. Durning. (2008) Evaluation, Grading, and Use of the RIME Vocabulary on Internal Medicine Clerkships: Results of a National Survey and Comparison to Other Clinical Clerkships. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 20:2, 118-126
CrossRef84
Lee A. Learman, Amy M. Autry, Patricia O’Sullivan. (2008) Reliability and validity of reflection exercises for obstetrics and gynecology residents. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 198:4, 461.e1-461.e10
CrossRef85
Andrew G. Lee, Karl C. Golnik, Thomas A. Oetting, Hilary A. Beaver, H. Culver Boldt, Richard Olson, Emily Greenlee, Michael D. Abramoff, A. Tim Johnson, Keith Carter. (2008) Re-engineering the Resident Applicant Selection Process in Ophthalmology: A Literature Review and Recommendations for Improvement. Survey of Ophthalmology 53:2, 164-176
CrossRef86
M. D. Brennan. (2008) Professionalism and academic medicine: the Mayo Clinic program in professionalism. Irish Journal of Medical Science 177:1, 23-27
CrossRef87
Jill Morrison. (2008) Professional behaviour in medical students and fitness to practise. Medical Education 42:2, 118-120
CrossRef88
E. L. Erde. (2008) Professionalism's Facets: Ambiguity, Ambivalence, and Nostalgia. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33:1, 6-26
CrossRef89
James Kleshinski. (2008) The Use of Professionalism Scenarios in the Medical School Interview Process: Faculty and Interviewee Perceptions. Medical Education Online 13,
CrossRef90
Arden D. Dingle, Margaret L. Stuber. (2008) Ethics Education. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 17:1, 187-207
CrossRef91
David L. Greenburg, Steven J. Durning, Daniel L. Cohen, David Cruess, Jeffrey L. Jackson. (2007) Identifying Medical Students Likely to Exhibit Poor Professionalism and Knowledge During Internship. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22:12, 1711-1717
CrossRef92
Jordan J. Cohen. (2007) Viewpoint: Linking Professionalism to Humanism: What It Means, Why It Matters. Academic Medicine 82:11, 1029-1032
CrossRef93
Herbert M. Swick. (2007) Viewpoint: Professionalism and Humanism Beyond the Academic Health Center. Academic Medicine 82:11, 1022-1028
CrossRef94
Holly J. Humphrey, Kelly Smith, Shalini Reddy, Don Scott, James L. Madara, Vineet M. Arora. (2007) Promoting an Environment of Professionalism: The University of Chicago “Roadmap”. Academic Medicine 82:11, 1098-1107
CrossRef95
Beth A. Lown, Calvin L. Chou, William D. Clark, Paul Haidet, Maysel Kemp White, Edward Krupat, Stephen Pelletier, Peter Weissmann, M. Brownell Anderson. (2007) Caring Attitudes in Medical Education: Perceptions of Deans and Curriculum Leaders. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22:11, 1514-1522
CrossRef96
Jason M Satterfield, Ellen Hughes. (2007) Emotion skills training for medical students: a systematic review. Medical Education 41:10, 935-941
CrossRef97
C. Ronald MacKenzie. (2007) Professionalism and Medicine. HSS Journal 3:2, 222-227
CrossRef98
Shalini T. Reddy, Jeanne M. Farnan, John D. Yoon, Troy Leo, Gaurav A. Upadhyay, Holly J. Humphrey, Vineet M. Arora. (2007) Third-Year Medical Students’ Participation in and Perceptions of Unprofessional Behaviors. Academic Medicine 82:Suppl, S35-S39
CrossRef99
Carol S. Hodgson, Arianne Teherani, Harrion G. Gough, Pamela Bradley, Maxine A. Papadakis. (2007) The Relationship between Measures of Unprofessional Behavior during Medical School and Indices on the California Psychological Inventory. Academic Medicine 82:Suppl, S4-S7
CrossRef100
Walther N K A van Mook, Willem S de Grave, Elise Huijssen-Huisman, Marianne de Witt-Luth, Diana H J M Dolmans, Arno M M Muijtjens, Lambert W Schuwirth, Cees P M van der Vleuten. (2007) Factors inhibiting assessment of students' professional behaviour in the tutorial group during problem-based learning. Medical Education 41:9, 849-856
CrossRef101
Jerry A. Colliver, Stephen J. Markwell, Steven J. Verhulst, Randall S. Robbs. (2007) The Prognostic Value of Documented Unprofessional Behavior in Medical School Records for Predicting and Preventing Subsequent Medical Board Disciplinary Action: The Papadakis Studies Revisited. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 19:3, 213-215
CrossRef102
Clarence D. Kreiter, Yuka Kreiter. (2007) A Validity Generalization Perspective on the Ability of Undergraduate GPA and the Medical College Admission Test to Predict Important Outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 19:2, 95-100
CrossRef103
Benjamin Siegel. (2007) Parents as Teachers and Evaluators of Medical Student Professionalism. Ambulatory Pediatrics 7:3, 203-204
CrossRef104
Harold I Reiter, Kevin W Eva, Jack Rosenfeld, Geoffrey R Norman. (2007) Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Medical Education 41:4, 378-384
CrossRef105
J.A. Stockman. (2007) Disciplinary Action by Medical Boards and Prior Behavior in Medical School. Yearbook of Pediatrics 2007, 308-311
CrossRef106
Dorothy Stubbe, Ellen Heyneman, Saundra Stock. (2007) A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Intervention Strategies for the Remediation of Competency. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 16:1, 249-264
CrossRef107
Warren A. Kinghorn, Matthew D. McEvoy, Andrew Michel, Michael Balboni. (2007) Viewpoint: Professionalism in Modern Medicine: Does the Emperor Have Any Clothes?. Academic Medicine 82:1, 40-45
CrossRef108
O.P. Phillips. (2007) Disciplinary Action by Medical Boards and Prior Behavior in Medical School. Yearbook of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health 2007, 9-10
CrossRef109
Melissa L. Davidson. (2007) The 360° Evaluation. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery 24:1, 65-94
CrossRef110
A. Verma. (2007) Disciplinary Action by Medical Boards and Prior Behavior in Medical School. Yearbook of Neurology and Neurosurgery 2007, 199-200
CrossRef111
Stephen J. Lurie, David R. Lambert, Anne C. Nofziger, Ronald M. Epstein, Tana A. Grady-Weliky. (2007) Relationship Between Peer Assessment During Medical School, Dean’s Letter Rankings, and Ratings by Internship Directors. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22:1, 13-16
CrossRef112
&NA;. (2006) Medical Education. Obstetrics & Gynecology 108:5, 1062-1066
CrossRef113
Cox, Malcolm, Irby, David M., , Stern, David T., Papadakis, Maxine, . (2006) The Developing Physician — Becoming a Professional. New England Journal of Medicine 355:17, 1794-1799
Full Text114
Richard Cruess, Jodi Herold McIlroy, Sylvia Cruess, Shiphra Ginsburg, Yvonne Steinert. (2006) The Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise: A Preliminary Investigation. Academic Medicine 81:Suppl, S74-S78
CrossRef115
Michael A. Ainsworth, Karen M. Szauter. (2006) Medical Student Professionalism: Are We Measuring the Right Behaviors? A Comparison of Professional Lapses by Students and Physicians. Academic Medicine 81:Suppl, S83-S86
CrossRef116
Alan Jotkowitz, Shimon Glick. (2006) Education in Professionalism Should Never End. The American Journal of Bioethics 6:4, 27-28
CrossRef117
Jordan J Cohen. (2006) Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: from evidence to accountability. Medical Education 40:7, 607-617
CrossRef118
Bertha Escobar-Poni, Esteban S. Poni. (2006) The role of gross anatomy in promoting professionalism: A neglected opportunity!. Clinical Anatomy 19:5, 461-467
CrossRef119
Kelly Fryer-Edwards, M Davis Wilkins, Amy Baernstein, Clarence H. Braddock. (2006) Bringing Ethics Education to the Clinical Years: Ward Ethics Sessions at the University of Washington. Academic Medicine 81:7, 626-631
CrossRef120
Louise Arnold. (2006) Responding to the Professionalism of Learners and Faculty in Orthopaedic Surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research PAP,
CrossRef121
(2006) Unprofessional Behavior among Medical Students. New England Journal of Medicine 354:17, 1851-1853
Full Text122
Rosamond Rhodes, Lawrence G. Smith. 2006. Chapter 6: Molding Professional Character. , 99-114.
CrossRef123
Edmund Pellegrino. 2006. Chapter 1: Character Formation and the Making of Good Physicians. , 1-15.
CrossRef124
Kirk, Lynne M., Blank, Linda L.. (2005) Professional Behavior — A Learner's Permit for Licensure. New England Journal of Medicine 353:25, 2709-2711
Full Text
- Letters
