Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Special Article

An Intervention Involving Traditional Birth Attendants and Perinatal and Maternal Mortality in Pakistan

Abdul Hakeem Jokhio, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Heather R. Winter, M.D., M.R.C.O.G., and Kar Keung Cheng, M.B., B.S., Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 2005; 352:2091-2099May 19, 2005

Abstract

Background

There are approximately 4 million neonatal deaths and half a million maternal deaths worldwide each year. There is limited evidence from clinical trials to guide the development of effective maternity services in developing countries.

Methods

We performed a cluster-randomized, controlled trial involving seven subdistricts (talukas) of a rural district in Pakistan. In three talukas randomly assigned to the intervention group, traditional birth attendants were trained and issued disposable delivery kits; Lady Health Workers linked traditional birth attendants with established services and documented processes and outcomes; and obstetrical teams provided outreach clinics for antenatal care. Women in the four control talukas received usual care. The primary outcome measures were perinatal and maternal mortality.

Results

Of the estimated number of eligible women in the seven talukas, 10,114 (84.3 percent) were recruited in the three intervention talukas, and 9443 (78.7 percent) in the four control talukas. In the intervention group, 9184 women (90.8 percent) received antenatal care by trained traditional birth attendants, 1634 women (16.2 percent) were seen antenatally at least once by the obstetrical teams, and 8172 safe-delivery kits were used. As compared with the control talukas, the intervention talukas had a cluster-adjusted odds ratio for perinatal death of 0.70 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.82) and for maternal mortality of 0.74 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.23).

Conclusions

Training traditional birth attendants and integrating them into an improved health care system were achievable and effective in reducing perinatal mortality. This model could result in large improvements in perinatal and maternal health in developing countries.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Flow Chart Showing the Enrollment and Status of Women in the Trial.
Table 1Factors Related to Delivery According to Study Group.
Article

There are an estimated 4 million neonatal deaths and 500,000 maternal deaths worldwide each year.1,2 The vast majority of these deaths occur in developing countries, where 43 percent of births are attended by traditional birth attendants, the proportion generally being higher in rural areas. Training traditional birth attendants was a central component of the Safe Motherhood Initiative launched by the World Health Organization, the United Nations Children's Fund (also known as UNICEF), the United Nations Population Fund, the World Bank, and other organizations, but the lack of evidence from randomized, controlled trials to inform decision making has prohibited widespread implementation of such training.3,4 We present the results of a large cluster-randomized, controlled trial of training traditional birth attendants and integrating them into an improved maternal health care system in rural Pakistan.

Organized data on routine health outcomes do not exist in rural Pakistan. The World Health Organization's estimate of maternal mortality in Pakistan (350 per 100,000 live births in 1995) was modeled from projections of deaths of adult females.5 In Pakistan, more than 89 percent of deliveries, and 80 percent of maternal deaths, occur at home, and 80 percent of deliveries are attended by only a traditional birth attendant.6,7 Only 1 in 20 women with complications of pregnancy or childbirth reaches a facility with emergency obstetrical care. Infant mortality is estimated at 82 per 1000 live births.8

Methods

Study Design

The study was a randomized, controlled trial. Since the intervention included the training of traditional birth attendants, an individualized, randomized design would have led to contamination between intervention and control care; therefore, cluster randomization was required. Financial and logistic considerations dictated the subdistrict (taluka) as the most appropriate unit for randomization.

Setting

Sindh is one of Pakistan's four provinces. In Sindh's 21 districts, an infrastructure of primary and district-level care serves well-defined geographic areas. Larkana, the study district, is largely rural. The Ministry of Health's Lady Health Workers Programme is an important element in the government of Pakistan's plan to raise the health status of women and children in rural villages and poor urban areas. A cadre of Lady Health Workers based at primary health centers have a mission of delivering primary health care, including maternal-health and child-health services. Although the women are educated (10 years of schooling), they have no medical or nursing degree, but they do receive 3 to 6 months of training in primary health care and family planning. Recruiting and retaining female medical staff is difficult in rural areas, so the quality of primary maternity services is, in general, poor.

Study Groups

With a simple cluster-randomization sampling scheme, and with a computer-generated procedure, Larkana's seven talukas were allocated to intervention or control groups. All pregnant women were eligible for inclusion. Most of the private medical centers and a public tertiary-level hospital providing specialist obstetrical care are located in Larkana City, where residents have better access to services. The city and its immediate environs were therefore excluded.

Intervention Clusters

The intervention was designed to facilitate care based on the available infrastructure and to be low-cost and sustainable. In the intervention clusters, a team of obstetricians and female paramedics trained all traditional birth attendants in the taluka who performed at least one delivery per month (Figure 1Figure 1Flow Chart Showing the Enrollment and Status of Women in the Trial.). The training lasted three days and involved the use of picture cards containing advice on antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum care; how to conduct a clean delivery; use of the disposable delivery kit; when to refer women for emergency obstetrical care; and care of the newborn. The traditional birth attendants were asked to visit each woman at least three times during the pregnancy (at three, six, and nine months) to check for dangerous signs such as bleeding or eclampsia, and to encourage women with such signs to seek emergency obstetrical care. Lady Health Workers were trained to support the traditional attendants and record the data.

Because of the difficulties in recruiting full-time female medical staff in primary care centers, obstetrical consultation was also provided by two teams of obstetricians from the public-sector tertiary care center in Larkana City. These teams offered outreach clinics in two centers (one taluka hospital and one large, rural health center) in each of the three intervention talukas. The teams rotated their visits among the centers, holding eight outreach sessions in each center during the six-month intervention period.

Traditional birth attendants were instructed to register all pregnant women in their catchment areas and to inform the Lady Health Workers about the pregnant women under their care. Subsequently, the traditional birth attendants were issued delivery kits from the primary care centers. The kits included sterilized disposable gloves, soap, gauze, cotton balls, antiseptic solution, an umbilical-cord clamp, and a surgical blade. We anticipated that these kits would improve the standing of the traditional birth attendants among their clients, and the method of distribution was designed to increase the links between traditional birth attendants and the primary care facilities.

Control Clusters

In the control clusters, Lady Health Workers enrolled and followed up all pregnant women in their catchment area in the course of their normal monthly home visits to women and children. The traditional birth attendants in the control clusters did not receive any training and were not supplied with delivery kits. No outreach clinics were organized in these talukas, and women in these areas received “usual” care.

Follow-up

Follow-up in both groups involved the collection of information by Lady Health Workers, who asked the women, their families, and traditional birth attendants for details of the progress and outcome of each pregnancy that was registered. In cases of maternal death, the cause was ascertained by Lady Health Workers on the basis of oral reports from relatives, neighbors, or traditional birth attendants.

Outcome Measures

The primary outcomes were perinatal mortality (stillbirths and live-born babies who died within 28 days after birth) and maternal mortality (deaths during pregnancy and up to 6 weeks post partum, excluding those known to have been due to injury or accident) from any cause, including deaths after spontaneous abortion (loss of a fetus before 6 months of gestation). Only singleton pregnancies were included in the analysis of perinatal outcome.

The secondary outcomes were major complications of pregnancy (hemorrhage, obstructed labor, puerperal sepsis, eclampsia, and abortion), referral by the traditional birth attendant for emergency obstetrical care, type and place of delivery, and delivery attendant. Lady Health Workers who recorded outcomes could not be blinded to the intervention status of the women but were not made aware of the main study objective or the outcome measures for the planned comparison.

Statistical Analysis

The sample size of this trial was limited by the available funding. Local information suggested that there were approximately 70,000 deliveries per year in Larkana district. After excluding urban areas, we estimated that 24,000 pregnant women could be recruited in six months. Randomization below the level of the taluka was not practical. With seven clusters (average size, 4000 pregnant women each) and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.001, the study would have 80 percent power (two-sided P<0.05) to detect a 23 percent difference in perinatal mortality (estimated at 95 per 1000 live births and stillbirths in the control group) between the study groups. Assuming maternal mortality in the control group of 400 per 100,000 pregnancies, such a sample size would permit us to detect a relative reduction in maternal mortality only as large as 90 percent. However, given the importance of the outcome, and the hypothesis that the outcome would be influenced by the intervention, we included maternal mortality as a primary outcome measure.

The data were entered into a database of epidemiologic information9 and analyzed with the use of SPSS software, version 10.0. Evaluation was by intention-to-treat analysis. Multilevel modeling to adjust for cluster randomization was performed with the use of MLwiN software, version 1.1.10 For perinatal and maternal mortality, we used a quasi-likelihood binary-regression model with random intercept to estimate the degree of overdispersion in the cluster-specific death rates. Odds ratios and 95 percent confidence limits were computed for the model coefficients with the use of MLwiN guidelines.10

No formal ethics committee exists in this region, but the protocol was discussed and approved after a meeting of Sindh province's secretary of health, director of health services (Larkana Division), and director of the Lady Health Worker Programme (at which Dr. Jokhio was present). These key people acted as guardians of the women's interests.

Results

A total of 19,557 women were recruited in the six months from May to October 1998. An exact figure for the eligible women could not be obtained, since there are no reliable birth registers. On the basis of the crude estimate of 24,000 deliveries in a six-month period, the 10,114 women in the intervention group and the 9443 women in the control group represented 84.3 percent and 78.7 percent, respectively, of the eligible total (Figure 1). Follow-up to 42 days post partum was achieved for 10,093 women (99.8 percent) in the intervention group and 9432 women (99.9 percent) in the control group. Pregnancy ended in spontaneous abortion in 255 women (2.5 percent) in the intervention group and 313 women (3.3 percent) in the control group (Table 1Table 1Factors Related to Delivery According to Study Group.). One hundred twenty-six women (1.2 percent) in the intervention group and 130 women (1.4 percent) in the control group had multiple births.

The baseline maternal characteristics were similar for the study groups and across clusters with respect to all measured variables except years of education, which were slightly greater among women in the control group (Table 2Table 2Baseline Maternal Characteristics According to Study Group and Cluster.). The size of the clusters ranged from 1966 to 3987 women. Of the women in the intervention group, 9184 (90.8 percent) received care by trained traditional birth attendants, and 1634 (16.2 percent) had at least one antepartum visit with the consulting obstetrical teams. Traditional birth attendants used 8172 safe-delivery kits for the intervention group.

The crude perinatal rate of death among the intervention group was 84.8 per 1000 (823 deaths per 9710 live births and stillbirths) as compared with 120 per 1000 (1077 deaths per 8989 live births and stillbirths) in the control group (Table 3Table 3Distribution of Outcome Measures According to Study Group and Cluster.). We used random-effects multilevel modeling to determine that the odds ratio for perinatal death in the intervention group, as compared with the control group, was 0.70 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.82); the results were similar for stillbirths and neonatal deaths (Table 4Table 4Odds Ratios for Primary and Secondary Outcomes.) and across intervention clusters (Table 3). There were 27 maternal deaths in the intervention group and 34 in the control group, corresponding to respective maternal mortality rates of 268 and 360 per 100,000 pregnancies. The cluster-adjusted odds ratio for maternal deaths in the intervention group, as compared with the control group, was 0.74 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.23).

The intervention group had significantly lower rates of puerperal sepsis and hemorrhage as a complication of pregnancy (Table 4). The frequency of a diagnosis of obstructed labor was significantly greater in the intervention group. The frequencies of eclampsia and of spontaneous abortion with associated morbidity did not differ significantly between groups, but the overall numbers of complications recorded were small. Women in the intervention group were more likely than those in the control group to be referred to emergency obstetrical care for treatment (Table 4).

The cause of maternal death, as ascertained by oral report to the Lady Health Workers, is summarized in Table 4.

Discussion

There was a significant reduction in perinatal mortality of about 30 percent in the intervention group of this large, cluster-randomized, controlled trial. The estimated percent reduction in maternal mortality was similar but was not statistically significant despite the large size of the trial. The large decrease in puerperal sepsis is consistent with the recorded high use of safe-delivery kits by traditional birth attendants. It is likely that much of the reduction in perinatal mortality was mediated through reduced sepsis, but it was not possible to obtain definitive information.

The training of traditional birth attendants included teaching them to recognize serious complications of pregnancy and delivery, and obstructed labor was more frequently recorded for women in the intervention group. Referral to public health services was also encouraged, and correspondingly, a higher proportion of women in the intervention group than in the control group were referred to an emergency obstetrical care facility. To obtain such care, even in publicly funded hospitals, women and their families must arrange for their own transportation and pay for all drugs and equipment. Intervention did not involve changes in the availability of or access to existing emergency care. This may explain why, despite the increased referrals for emergency care, there was no significant increase in the percentage of women who delivered at a public or private health facility. We do not have information on the acceptance or the outcomes of these referrals.

Limited data have been available on the value of training traditional birth attendants and integrating them into a maternal health care system in developing countries. A clear strength of the present study is its cluster-randomized design. It was not feasible for individual patients to undergo randomization, owing to the risk of contamination if trained traditional birth attendants were expected to deliver two different forms of care. The small number of clusters of very large size is a limitation of the trial design.11 The administrative and training costs of delivering alternative forms of care to a larger number of smaller geographic clusters were prohibitive, and the risk of contamination would have been increased.12 No major organizational or demographic differences were anticipated among the talukas, and the baseline characteristics of women in different talukas were similar. The effect of intervention on perinatal mortality seemed consistent across intervention clusters, and adjusting for cluster had no material effect on the estimated risk reductions.

We have no data to ascertain the accuracy of the reports of death or of the reported causes of maternal death. Although the traditional birth attendants and Lady Health Workers could not be blinded to the intervention, observer bias is unlikely to have affected the reporting of the primary outcomes of perinatal and maternal mortality. Lady Health Workers, who collected data on the primary outcomes in both groups, were not aware of the purpose or comparative nature of the study.

The method of providing safe-delivery kits to traditional birth attendants improved their contact with primary care centers and with the Lady Health Workers linked to the attendants. The standing and confidence of traditional birth attendants may also have been improved by their authority to refer women to outreach clinics for antenatal care, although we did not directly assess this.

In the 1990s, it became widely accepted that training traditional birth attendants was likely to cause only a small reduction in maternal mortality.4,13 A recent review suggested that training may improve the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of traditional birth attendants,14 but effects on neonatal mortality could not be adequately assessed owing to incomplete reporting and the inadequate quality of available studies.15 Only 4 of the 63 studies compared outcomes in the study group before and after traditional birth attendant training with those in a control group, and the key features of the study were often not reported.

A recently reported cluster-randomized trial in Nepal showed a 30 percent reduction in neonatal mortality per 1000 live births (similar to our findings) and a 78 percent reduction in maternal mortality in clusters exposed to different community-based interventions.16 The interventions did not involve traditional birth attendants but, rather, involved the convening of women's groups to identify local perinatal problems and formulate strategies to address them; resulting changes included more clean-delivery practices and better links with improved primary care services. The results from that study and the current trial confirm the possibility of large improvements in perinatal and maternal health from interventions at the community level.

Experts from several centers have pointed out the lack of evidence that interventions are effective in reducing maternal and perinatal mortality in developing countries.17-20 Ethical and practical constraints have limited the study of potential interventions — for example, the large sample size needed to detect differences in maternal mortality.17 Despite the large number of women in our study, it was not adequately powered to detect a meaningful change in maternal mortality. Although results from the study in Nepal are encouraging, it would be unwise to use the large risk reduction in maternal mortality in that study to form the basis for estimates of sample size for future trials.16 Some people have proposed the use of perinatal mortality as a proxy for maternal mortality, but this suggestion is controversial21,22; in the present study, the change in maternal mortality appeared to mirror closely that in perinatal mortality.

We tried to capitalize on an infrastructure that is already in place but fails to meet women's needs. Our results show that substantial improvement in outcomes is achievable and sustainable within this infrastructure. These data should inform policy decisions directed toward reducing neonatal and maternal mortality in developing countries.17,18

Supported by a grant from Family Health Project of the Sindh government's health department (for capital costs) and by the University of Birmingham (for data entry).

We are indebted to the health department of the Sindh government; the director of health services, Larkana division, for logistic support through the district health officer; the Lady Health Workers and traditional birth attendants who took part in the study; the specialist obstetrical teams who ran the outreach clinics; and the women who took part in the study. We are also indebted to Dr. Paul Aveyard and Dr. David Braunholtz for statistical advice, and to Prof. Christine MacArthur for her comments on drafts of the article.

Source Information

From Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan (A.H.J.); and the Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K. (A.H.J., H.R.W., K.K.C.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Jokhio at Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    AbouZahr C. Wardlaw T. Maternal mortality in 2000: estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004. (Accessed March 15, 2005, at http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_mortality_2000/mme.pdf.)

  2. 2

    Statistical overview of newborn health. In: Saving Newborn Lives Initiative. State of the world's newborns. Washington, D.C.: Save the Children, 2001:44-8.

  3. 3

    Kamal IT. The traditional birth attendant: a reality and a challenge. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998;63:Suppl 1:S43-S52
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    De Brouwere V, Tonglet R, Van Lerberghe W. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality in developing countries: what can we learn from the history of the industrialized West? Trop Med Int Health 1998;3:771-782
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Making pregnancy safer statistics in EMR. Part 1. 2002. (Accessed March 15, 2005, at http://www.emro.who.int/rhrn/part1.htm.)

  6. 6

    Pakistan Medical Research Council. National health survey of Pakistan 1990-94: health profile of the people of Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan: Network Publication Service, 1998.

  7. 7

    Maternal and infant mortality, policy and interventions: report of an international workshop at the Aga Khan University. Karachi, Pakistan: Aga Khan University, February 1994.

  8. 8

    Pakistan demographic health survey, 1990-91. Islamabad, Pakistan: National Institute of Population Studies, 1991.

  9. 9

    Dean AG, Dean JA, Coulombier D, et al. Epi Info, version 6.04b: a word processing database, and statistics program for public health on IBM-compatible microcomputers. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997.

  10. 10

    Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, et al. A users guide to MlW: multilevel models project, version 1.1a. London: Institute of Education, 2000.

  11. 11

    Murray D. Design and analysis of group randomised trials. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

  12. 12

    Ukoumunne O, Gulliford M, Chinn S, Sterne JA, Burney PG, Donner A. Evaluation of health interventions at area and organisation level. BMJ 1999;319:376-379
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Maine D. Safe motherhood programs: options and issues. New York: Columbia University, Center for Population and Family, 1991.

  14. 14

    Sibley L, Ann Sipe T. What can a meta-analysis tell us about traditional birth attendant training and pregnancy outcomes? Midwifery 2004;20:51-60
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Sibley L, Sipe TA, Armelagos GH, et al. Traditional birth attendant training effectiveness: a meta-analysis. Washington, D.C.: AED/SARA Project, 2002.

  16. 16

    Manandhar DS, Osrin D, Shrestha BP, et al. Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:970-979
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Miller S, Sloan NL, Winikoff B, Langer A, Fikree FF. Where is the “E“ in MCH? The need for an evidence-based approach in safe motherhood. J Midwifery Womens Health 2003;48:10-18
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Graham WJ. Now or never: the case for measuring maternal mortality. Lancet 2002;359:701-704
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Goodburn E, Campbell O. Reducing maternal mortality in the developing world: sector-wide approaches may be the key. BMJ 2001;322:917-920
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Maine D, Rosenfield A. The Safe Motherhood Initiative: why has it stalled? Am J Public Health 1999;89:480-482
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Campbell O, Koblinsky M, Taylor P. Off to a rapid start: appraising maternal mortality and services. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;48:Suppl 3:S33-S52
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Akalin MZ, Maine D, de Francisco A, Vaughan R. Why perinatal mortality cannot be a proxy for maternal mortality. Stud Fam Plann 1997;28:330-335
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (81)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Sajid Soofi, Simon Cousens, Aamer Imdad, Naveed Bhutto, Nabeela Ali, Zulfiqar A Bhutta. (2012) Topical application of chlorhexidine to neonatal umbilical cords for prevention of omphalitis and neonatal mortality in a rural district of Pakistan: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Vishwajeet Kumar, Aarti Kumar, Vinita Das, Neeraj M. Srivastava, Abdullah H. Baqui, Gary L. Darmstadt, Mathuram Santosham. (2012) Community-driven impact of a newborn-focused behavioral intervention on maternal health in Shivgarh, India. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    J. R. Willis, V. Kumar, S. Mohanty, V. Singh, A. Kumar, J. V. Singh, R. P. Misra, S. Awasthi, P. Singh, A. Gupta, A. H. Baqui, M. Santosham, G. L. Darmstadt, . (2011) Impact of Community-Based Behaviour-Change Management on Perceived Neonatal Morbidity: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Shivgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Patricia E. Bailey, Emily B. Keyes, Caleb Parker, Muna Abdullah, Henok Kebede, Lynn Freedman. (2011) Using a GIS to model interventions to strengthen the emergency referral system for maternal and newborn health in Ethiopia. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 115:3, 300-309
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    C Engmann. (2011) Improving neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: any cause for optimism?. Journal of Perinatology 31:12, 745-748
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Abbey Byrne, Alison Morgan. (2011) How the integration of traditional birth attendants with formal health systems can increase skilled birth attendance. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 115:2, 127-134
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Solomon Chih-Cheng Chen, Jung-Der Wang, Aimee Lou Ward, Chang-Chuan Chan, Pau-Chung Chen, Hung-Che Chiang, Rose Kolola-Dzimadzi, Yohane M.Z. Nyasulu, Joseph Kwong-Leung Yu. (2011) The effectiveness of continuing training for traditional birth attendants on their reproductive health-care knowledge and performance. Midwifery 27:5, 648-653
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Sheela Saravanan, Gavin Turrell, Helen Johnson, Jennifer Fraser, Carla Maree Patterson. (2011) Re-examining authoritative knowledge in the design and content of a TBA training in India. Midwifery
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    ZS Lassi, ZA Bhutta. (2011) Unfolding the universe of newborn health interventions: the role of innovative community-based strategies. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 118, 18-21
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Hamid Hassan, Abdul Hakeem Jokhio, Heather Winter, Christine MacArthur. (2011) Safe delivery and newborn care practices in Sindh, Pakistan: a community-based investigation of mothers and health workers. Midwifery
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    M. Abuqamar, D. Coomans, F. Louckx. (2011) Health behaviour and health awareness in infant mortality in the Gaza Strip. The European Journal of Public Health
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    C. R. Titaley, M. J. Dibley, C. L. Roberts. (2011) Type of delivery attendant, place of delivery and risk of early neonatal mortality: analyses of the 1994-2007 Indonesia Demographic and Health Surveys. Health Policy and Planning
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Sheela Saravanan, Gavin Turrell, Helen Johnson, Jenny Fraser, Carla Patterson. (2011) Traditional birth attendant training and local birthing practices in India. Evaluation and Program Planning 34:3, 254-265
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Siddhartha Gogia, Siddarth Ramji, Piyush Gupta, Tarun Gera, Dheeraj Shah, Joseph L. Mathew, Pavitra Mohan, Rajmohan Panda. (2011) Community based newborn care: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence: UNICEF-PHFI series on newborn and child health, India. Indian Pediatrics 48:7, 537-546
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    N. M. Shah, W. R. Brieger, D. H. Peters. (2011) Can interventions improve health services from informal private providers in low and middle-income countries? A comprehensive review of the literature. Health Policy and Planning 26:4, 275-287
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Maryam Hadavi, Soghra Alidalaki, Maryam Abedininejad, Setare Akhavan. (2011) Etiologies and contributing factors of perinatal mortality: A report from southeast of Iran. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 50:2, 145-148
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Suneet P. Chauhan, Lata M. Gupta, Barbara Assel, Everett F. Magann, John C. Magann, Usha Gupta. (2011) Intrapartum fetal surveillance: Summary of four national evidence-based guidelines and need to develop Indian guidelines. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 61:3, 267-274
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Bolajoko O. Olusanya, Victor A. Inem, Olayinka A. Abosede. (2011) Infants Delivered in Maternity Homes Run by Traditional Birth Attendants in Urban Nigeria: A Community-Based Study. Health Care for Women International 32:6, 474-491
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Vanora A. Hundley, Bilal I. Avan, David Braunholtz, Wendy J. Graham. (2011) Are birth kits a good idea? A systematic review of the evidence. Midwifery
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Robert Pattinson, Kate Kerber, Eckhart Buchmann, Ingrid K Friberg, Maria Belizan, Sonia Lansky, Eva Weissman, Matthews Mathai, Igor Rudan, Neff Walker, Joy E Lawn. (2011) Stillbirths: how can health systems deliver for mothers and babies?. The Lancet 377:9777, 1610-1623
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Robert L Goldenberg, Elizabeth M McClure, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, José M Belizán, Uma M Reddy, Craig E Rubens, Hillary Mabeya, Vicki Flenady, Gary L Darmstadt. (2011) Stillbirths: the vision for 2020. The Lancet 377:9779, 1798-1805
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Tami Rowen, Ndola Prata, Paige Passano. (2011) Evaluation of a traditional birth attendant training programme in Bangladesh. Midwifery 27:2, 229-236
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Hannah Blencowe, Simon Cousens, Luke C Mullany, Anne CC Lee, Kate Kerber, Steve Wall, Gary L Darmstadt, Joy E Lawn. (2011) Clean birth and postnatal care practices to reduce neonatal deaths from sepsis and tetanus: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect. BMC Public Health 11:Suppl 3, S11
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Gary L. Darmstadt, Anita K.M. Zaidi, Barbara J. Stoll. 2011. Neonatal Infections. , 24-51.
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Abdullah H Baqui, Yoonjoung Choi, Emma K Williams, Shams E Arifeen, Ishtiaq Mannan, Gary L Darmstadt, Robert E Black. (2011) Levels, timing, and etiology of stillbirths in Sylhet district of Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 11:1, 25
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Anne CC Lee, Simon Cousens, Gary L Darmstadt, Hannah Blencowe, Robert Pattinson, Neil F Moran, G Hofmeyr, Rachel A Haws, Shereen Bhutta, Joy E Lawn. (2011) Care during labor and birth for the prevention of intrapartum-related neonatal deaths: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect. BMC Public Health 11:Suppl 3, S10
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Angelo S Nyamtema, David P Urassa, Jos van Roosmalen. (2011) Maternal health interventions in resource limited countries: a systematic review of packages, impacts and factors for change. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 11:1, 30
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Anisur Rahman, Allisyn Moran, Jesmin Pervin, Aminur Rahman, Monjur Rahman, Sharifa Yeasmin, Hosneara Begum, Harunor Rashid, Mohammad Yunus, Daniel Hruschka, Shams E Arifeen, Peter K Streatfield, Lynn Sibley, Abbas Bhuiya, Marge Koblinsky. (2011) Effectiveness of an integrated approach to reduce perinatal mortality: recent experiences from Matlab, Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 11:1, 914
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Steven A. Julious. (2011) Seven useful designs. Pharmaceutical Statisticsn/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Zohra S Lassi, Batool A Haider, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Zulfiqar A Bhutta. 2010. Zinc supplementation for the prevention of pneumonia in children aged 2 months to 59 months. .
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Rajiv Bahl, Shamim Qazi, Gary L. Darmstadt, Jose Martines. (2010) Why Is Continuum of Care from Home to Health Facilities Essential to Improve Perinatal Survival?. Seminars in Perinatology 34:6, 477-485
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Jessica Schiffman, Gary L. Darmstadt, Siddharth Agarwal, Abdullah H. Baqui. (2010) Community-Based Intervention Packages for Improving Perinatal Health in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence. Seminars in Perinatology 34:6, 462-476
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Zohra S Lassi, Batool A Haider, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Zulfiqar A Bhutta. 2010. Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes. .
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Vanora A. Hundley, Bilal I. Avan, David Braunholtz, Ann E. Fitzmaurice, Wendy J. Graham. (2010) Lessons regarding the use of birth kits in low resource countries. Midwifery
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    E. Mazzi, A. E. Bartos, J. Carlin, M. W. Weber, G. L. Darmstadt, . (2010) Clinical signs predicting severe illness in young infants (<60 days) in Bolivia. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 56:5, 307-316
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    United Nations Economic and Social. (2010) Health Literacy and the Millennium Development Goals: United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) Regional Meeting Background Paper (Abstracted). Journal of Health Communication 15:sup2, 211-223
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Zelee Hill, Charlotte Tawiah-Agyemang, Eunice Okeyere, Alexander Manu, Justin Fenty, Betty Kirkwood. (2010) Improving Hygiene in Home Deliveries in Rural Ghana. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal1
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Simon Lewin, Susan Munabi-Babigumira, Claire Glenton, Karen Daniels, Xavier Bosch-Capblanch, Brian E van Wyk, Jan Odgaard-Jensen, Marit Johansen, Godwin N Aja, Merrick Zwarenstein, Inger B Scheel, Simon Lewin. 2010. Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases. .
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    G. L Darmstadt, S. E. Arifeen, Y. Choi, S. Bari, S. M Rahman, I. Mannan, P. Winch, A. N. U. Ahmed, H. R. Seraji, N. Begum, R. E Black, M. Santosham, A. H Baqui, . (2010) Household surveillance of severe neonatal illness by community health workers in Mirzapur, Bangladesh: coverage and compliance with referral. Health Policy and Planning 25:2, 112-124
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Ndola Prata, Paige Passano, Amita Sreenivas, Caitlin Elisabeth Gerdts. (2010) Maternal mortality in developing countries: challenges in scaling-up priority interventions. Women's Health 6:2, 311-327
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Muhiuddin Haider, Avinandan Mukherjee. (2010) Analysis of neonatal health in South Asia. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing 4:1, 40-59
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    RuthC Fretts, FrederikJ Frøen, Vicki Flenady. 2010. Stillbirths and prevention strategies in developing and developed countries. , 65-70.
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    N. Thatte, L.C. Mullany, S.K. Khatry, J. Katz, J.M. Tielsch, G.L. Darmstadt. (2009) Traditional birth attendants in rural Nepal: Knowledge, attitudes and practices about maternal and newborn health. Global Public Health 4:6, 600-617
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Anne CC Lee, Joy E. Lawn, Simon Cousens, Vishwajeet Kumar, David Osrin, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, Steven N. Wall, Allyala K. Nandakumar, Uzma Syed, Gary L. Darmstadt. (2009) Linking families and facilities for care at birth: What works to avert intrapartum-related deaths?. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 107, S65-S88
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Joy E. Lawn, Mary Kinney, Anne CC Lee, Mickey Chopra, France Donnay, Vinod K. Paul, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, Massee Bateman, Gary L. Darmstadt. (2009) Reducing intrapartum-related deaths and disability: Can the health system deliver?. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 107, S123-S142
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Gary L. Darmstadt, Anne CC Lee, Simon Cousens, Lynn Sibley, Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, France Donnay, Dave Osrin, Abhay Bang, Vishwajeet Kumar, Steven N. Wall, Abdullah Baqui, Joy E. Lawn. (2009) 60million non-facility births: Who can deliver in community settings to reduce intrapartum-related deaths?. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 107, S89-S112
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Z P Balsara, M H Hussein, P J Winch, R Gipson, M Santosham, G L Darmstadt. (2009) Impact of clean delivery kit use on clean delivery practices in Beni Suef Governorate, Egypt. Journal of Perinatology 29:10, 673-679
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Jacques Milliez. (2009) Rights to safe motherhood and newborn health: Ethical issues. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 106:2, 110-111
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Line Neerup Handlos, Hrishikesh Chakraborty, Pranab Kumar Sen. (2009) Evaluation of cluster-randomized trials on maternal and child health research in developing countries. Tropical Medicine & International Health 14:8, 947-956
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Kanako Masuno, Duangpachan Xaysomphoo, Alongkone Phengsavanh, Somthana Douangmala, Chushi Kuroiwa. (2009) Scaling up interventions to eliminate neonatal tetanus: Factors associated with the coverage of tetanus toxoid and clean deliveries among women in Vientiane, Lao PDR. Vaccine 27:32, 4284-4288
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Zulfiqar A. Bhutta, Anita K. M. Zaidi, Durrane Thaver, Quratulain Humayun, Samana Ali, Gary L. Darmstadt. (2009) Management of Newborn Infections in Primary Care Settings. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 28:Supplement, S22-S30
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Vincenzo Berghella, Jason K. Baxter, Suneet P. Chauhan. (2008) Evidence-based labor and delivery management. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 199:5, 445-454
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Mahrukh Fatima, Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi, Rabeea Rehman, Shahnaz Naseer Baloch. (2008) Quintuplets born to a woman without fertility treatment in Pakistan. Fertility and Sterility 90:5, 2007.e17-2007.e20
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Jamsheer J. Talati, Nadir Ali Syed. (2008) Surgical Training Programs in Pakistan. World Journal of Surgery 32:10, 2156-2161
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Samana Ali, Simon Cousens, Talaha M Ali, Batool Azra Haider, Arjumand Rizvi, Pius Okong, Shereen Z Bhutta, Robert E Black. (2008) Interventions to address maternal, newborn, and child survival: what difference can integrated primary health care strategies make?. The Lancet 372:9642, 972-989
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Vishwajeet Kumar, Saroj Mohanty, Aarti Kumar, Rajendra P Misra, Mathuram Santosham, Shally Awasthi, Abdullah H Baqui, Pramod Singh, Vivek Singh, Ramesh C Ahuja, Jai Vir Singh, Gyanendra Kumar Malik, Saifuddin Ahmed, Robert E Black, Mahendra Bhandari, Gary L Darmstadt. (2008) Effect of community-based behaviour change management on neonatal mortality in Shivgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 372:9644, 1151-1162
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Elizabeth M McClure, Sarah Saleem, Imtiaz Jehan, Omrana Pasha, Robert L Goldenberg. (2008) Stillbirths in developing countries. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology 3:5, 657-664
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Abdullah H Baqui, Shams El-Arifeen, Gary L Darmstadt, Saifuddin Ahmed, Emma K Williams, Habibur R Seraji, Ishtiaq Mannan, Syed M Rahman, Rasheduzzaman Shah, Samir K Saha, Uzma Syed, Peter J Winch, Amnesty Lefevre, Mathuram Santosham, Robert E Black. (2008) Effect of community-based newborn-care intervention package implemented through two service-delivery strategies in Sylhet district, Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 371:9628, 1936-1944
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Carine Ronsmans, Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury, Nurul Alam, Marge Koblinsky, Shams El Arifeen. (2008) Trends in stillbirths, early and late neonatal mortality in rural Bangladesh: the role of public health interventions. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 22:3, 269-279
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Salimah H Meghani, Zeba Aziz. (2008) The Need for an Effective Palliative Care Strategy in Pakistan. Journal of Public Health Policy 29:4, 480-484
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Gordon CS Smith, Ruth C Fretts. (2007) Stillbirth. The Lancet 370:9600, 1715-1725
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    J. Kelly, H.R. Winter. (2007) Reflections on the knowledge base for obstetric fistula. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 99, S21-S24
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Alan T. N. Tita, Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, Robert L. Goldenberg, Dwight J. Rouse. (2007) Two Decades of the Safe Motherhood Initiative. Obstetrics & Gynecology 110:5, 972-976
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    S Saleem, T Reza, E M. McClure, O Pasha, N Moss, D J. Rouse, J Bartz, R L. Goldenberg. (2007) Chlorhexidine Vaginal and Neonatal Wipes in Home Births in Pakistan. Obstetrics & Gynecology 110:5, 977-985
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Elizabeth M. McClure, Linda L. Wright, Robert L. Goldenberg, Shivaprasad S. Goudar, Sailajanandan N. Parida, Imtiaz Jehan, Antoinette Tshefu, Elwyn Chomba, Fernando Althabe, Ana Garces, Hillary Harris, Richard J. Derman, Pinaki Panigrahi, Cyril Engmann, Pierre Buekens, Michael Hambidge, Waldemar A. Carlo. (2007) The global network: a prospective study of stillbirths in developing countries. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 197:3, 247.e1-247.e5
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Imtiaz Jehan, Elizabeth M. McClure, Sohail Salat, Sameera Rizvi, Omrana Pasha, Hillary Harris, Nancy Moss, Robert L. Goldenberg. (2007) Stillbirths in an urban community in Pakistan. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 197:3, 257.e1-257.e8
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Lynn M Sibley, Theresa Ann Sipe, Carolyn M Brown, Melissa M Diallo, Kathryn McNatt, Nancy Habarta, Lynn M Sibley. 2007. Traditional birth attendant training for improving health behaviours and pregnancy outcomes. .
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Vincenzo Berghella. 2007. Before labor and first stage of labor. , 51-57.
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Gary L. Darmstadt, Mohamed Hassan Hussein, Peter J. Winch, Rachel A. Haws, Mohsen Lamia, Mohsen A. El-Said, Reginald F. Gipson, Mathuram Santosham. (2007) Neonatal home care practices in rural Egypt during the first week of life. Tropical Medicine & International Health 12:6, 783-797
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Gordon CS Smith. (2006) Predicting antepartum stillbirth. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 18:6, 625-630
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Abdul Jokhio, Heather Winter, KK Cheng, Khalid Khan, Christine MacArthur. (2006) Strategies for reducing maternal mortality. The Lancet 368:9553, 2122
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Anthony Costello, Kishwar Azad, Sarah Barnett. (2006) An alternative strategy to reduce maternal mortality. The Lancet 368:9546, 1477-1479
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Oona MR Campbell, Wendy J Graham. (2006) Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. The Lancet 368:9543, 1284-1299
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Kari White, Maria Small, Rikerdy Frederic, Gabriel Joseph, Reginald Bateau, Trace Kershaw. (2006) Health Seeking Behavior Among Pregnant Women in Rural Haiti. Health Care for Women International 27:9, 822-838
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Véronique Filippi, Carine Ronsmans, Oona MR Campbell, Wendy J Graham, Anne Mills, Jo Borghi, Marjorie Koblinsky, David Osrin. (2006) Maternal health in poor countries: the broader context and a call for action. The Lancet 368:9546, 1535-1541
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Ambreen Kazi, Zafar Fatmi, Juanita Hatcher, Muhammad Masood Kadir, Unaiza Niaz, Gail A. Wasserman. (2006) Social environment and depression among pregnant women in urban areas of Pakistan: Importance of social relations. Social Science & Medicine 63:6, 1466-1476
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Susan F. Murray, Stephen C. Pearson. (2006) Maternity referral systems in developing countries: Current knowledge and future research needs. Social Science & Medicine 62:9, 2205-2215
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Vinod K. Paul. (2006) The current state of newborn health in low income countries and the way forward. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 11:1, 7-14
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Lindsay Edouard, Stan Bernstein. (2006) Seeking equity in maternal health. The Lancet 367:9507, 279-281
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    (2005) An Intervention Involving Traditional Birth Attendants in Pakistan. New England Journal of Medicine 353:13, 1417-1418
    Full Text

  81. 81

    Zupan, Jelka, . (2005) Perinatal Mortality in Developing Countries. New England Journal of Medicine 352:20, 2047-2048
    Full Text

Letters