Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Special Article

Sex and Racial Differences in the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction, 1994 through 2002

Viola Vaccarino, M.D., Ph.D., Saif S. Rathore, M.P.H., Nanette K. Wenger, M.D., Paul D. Frederick, M.P.H., M.B.A., Jerome L. Abramson, Ph.D., Hal V. Barron, M.D., Ajay Manhapra, M.D., Susmita Mallik, M.D., and Harlan M. Krumholz, M.D. for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Investigators

N Engl J Med 2005; 353:671-682August 18, 2005

Abstract

Background

Although increased attention has been paid to sex and racial differences in the management of myocardial infarction, it is unknown whether these differences have narrowed over time.

Methods

With the use of data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction, we examined sex and racial differences in the treatment of patients who were deemed to be “ideal candidates” for particular treatments and in deaths among 598,911 patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction between 1994 and 2002.

Results

In the unadjusted analysis, sex and racial differences were observed for rates of reperfusion therapy (for white men, white women, black men, and black women: 86.5, 83.3, 80.4, and 77.8 percent, respectively; P<0.001), use of aspirin (84.4, 78.7, 83.7, and 78.4 percent, respectively; P<0.001), use of beta-blockers (66.6, 62.9, 67.8, and 64.5 percent; P<0.001), and coronary angiography (69.1, 55.9, 64.0, and 55.0 percent; P<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, racial and sex differences persisted for rates of reperfusion therapy (risk ratio for white women, black men, and black women: 0.97, 0.91, and 0.89, respectively, as compared with white men) and coronary angiography (relative risk, 0.91, 0.82, and 0.76) but were attenuated for the use of aspirin (risk ratio, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.94) and beta-blockers (risk ratio, 0.98, 1.00, and 0.96); all risks were unchanged over time. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was similar among white women (risk ratio, 1.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.07) and black men (risk ratio, 0.95; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.00), as compared with white men, but was higher among black women (risk ratio, 1.11; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.16) and was unchanged over time.

Conclusions

Rates of reperfusion therapy, coronary angiography, and in-hospital death after myocardial infarction, but not the use of aspirin and beta-blockers, vary according to race and sex, with no evidence that the differences have narrowed in recent years.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Proportions of Patients Considered Ideally Suited for Treatments and Procedures after Acute Myocardial Infarction, According to Sex and Race by Study Year.
Table 1Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Hospitalized Patients According to Sex, Race, and Study Year.
Article

In recent years, attention has been focused on variations in the treatment of coronary heart disease that are related to the sex and race of the patient. Landmark studies in the late 1980s and early 1990s reported differences in treatment according to sex and race.1-4 In the past decade, other investigations have described a generally consistent pattern of less intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in women, as compared with men,5-11 and in blacks, as compared with whites,8,9,12-17 across a variety of settings. Efforts to remedy racial and sex differences in health care use have received prominent attention, including a recent Institute of Medicine report18 and the Public Health Service's Healthy People 2010 initiative.19

Although sex and racial differences in the treatment of coronary heart disease have been documented for more than a decade, little is known about whether these differences have persisted in more recent years. We assessed temporal trends in sex and racial differences in the use of guideline-based management for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.

Methods

Patients

Since July 1, 1990, hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) have enrolled consecutive patients with myocardial infarction, as previously described.20 Because NRMI-1 (July 1990 through May 1994) collected little information on patients' characteristics, we restricted our analysis to the 1,724,984 patients from 1917 hospitals who were enrolled in NRMI-2 (June 1994 through March 1998), NRMI-3 (April 1998 through June 2000), and NRMI-4 (July 2000 through May 2002). We excluded 12,132 patients with erroneous discharge dates and 381,018 patients who were transferred from another acute care hospital because their early treatments were not documented. We also excluded 131,474 patients who survived less than 24 hours because of insufficient time to begin treatments; 40,881 patients of unknown age, sex, race, or survival status; 60,689 patients whose race was not recorded as white or black; and 55,316 patients with missing data for model covariables. We restricted our analysis to 658 hospitals (out of 1917 hospitals) participating in NRMI for the full study period, resulting in a final sample of 598,911 patients. NRMI data collection has previously been validated by comparison with the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.21 This protocol was deemed exempt from review by the institutional review board at Emory University.

Treatment of Myocardial Infarction

Patients were evaluated for the use of treatments recommended by the American College of Cardiology–American Heart Association (ACC–AHA) guidelines for the treatment of myocardial infarction since 1990.22-24 These included acute reperfusion therapy for patients with ST-segment elevation within 24 hours of admission, the administration of aspirin and beta-blockers within 24 hours of admission, and coronary angiography during hospitalization. As secondary treatment end points, we examined the frequency of coronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (except for primary PTCA, which was included in our definition of reperfusion therapy) during hospitalization.

To exclude racial or sex variations in treatment that may reflect differences in the proportion of patients for whom treatment is considered appropriate, we identified subgroups of patients who were ideally suited for each management strategy — in other words, patients with the strongest indications for treatment (ACC–AHA class I) and without major contraindications, according to guidelines published in 1990,22 1996,23 and 1999.24 When variations were present in the three sets of guidelines, the 1996 guidelines were followed, since they are similar to the 1999 guidelines and were published closest to the beginning of our observation period.

To avoid bias in regard to the availability of services, rates of coronary angiography were calculated among patients admitted to facilities with full capability of performing invasive cardiovascular procedures. Rates of use of CABG and PTCA were calculated among patients admitted to these facilities who were “ideal candidates” for coronary angiography and who underwent angiography. Because information was lacking on angiographic findings, we were not able to define further patient eligibility for revascularization. The only contraindication to the use of aspirin in the initial management of myocardial infarction is true allergy to salicylates, which is uncommon and was not recorded in NRMI. Therefore, no ideal-candidate subgroup was created for aspirin.

In-Hospital Mortality

We examined trends in hospital mortality according to sex and race. This analysis was restricted to patients who were not transferred to another acute care hospital, since the survival status of transferred patients in the second hospital was unknown.

Statistical Analysis

We categorized patients into four groups according to race and sex: white men, white women, black men, and black women. Sex and racial differences in demographic and clinical factors and in the characteristics of hospitals were assessed over the full study period and stratified according to year of treatment (with a year defined as the period from June through May). We calculated crude rates of treatment and in-hospital mortality for the selected subgroups of ideal-candidate patients in the four groups.

We used logistic-regression models to derive the likelihood of treatment and death for the four groups.25 We tested whether differences in the use of treatments according to sex and race changed over time by including a three-way interaction term reflecting the sex and race of patients and the year. Three consecutive models were constructed for each end point. Model 1 included sex, race, year, and all two-way and three-way interaction terms among sex, race, and year; model 2 expanded the data in model 1 to include other demographic and clinical factors; and model 3 expanded the data in model 2 to include characteristics of the hospitals. To assess whether the clustering of patients within hospitals affected our results, analyses were repeated with the use of generalized-estimating-equation models. The results were similar and are not reported. All analyses were performed using SAS software (version 8.2).

Results

Characteristics of Patients and Hospitals

The mean age of patients did not change substantially over time, but the prevalence of most coronary risk factors increased in all subgroups (Table 1Table 1Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Hospitalized Patients According to Sex, Race, and Study Year.), whereas there was a decline in the proportion of patients with ST-segment elevation or Q waves on initial electrocardiography. The four subgroups showed similar time trends in most factors, as shown by the nonsignificant interaction among sex, race, and year. In all years combined, there were substantial differences in many factors according to sex and race. For example, women in both racial groups were older than men, whereas blacks in both sex groups were younger than whites. As compared with white men, fewer female and black patients had ST-segment elevation or Q waves on initial electrocardiography, but women and blacks had more risk factors, a higher Killip class, and a longer delay to reach the hospital. As compared with whites, black patients tended to be hospitalized more often in facilities that were used for teaching, were affiliated with medical schools, were located in urban areas, and had equipment for performing cardiovascular procedures.

Ideal Candidates for Treatments and Procedures

The proportion of patients qualifying as ideal candidates for reperfusion and the administration of beta-blockers was 50 percent or less and declined over time in all groups. At each time point, women and blacks were less likely than white men to be ideal candidates (Figure 1Figure 1Proportions of Patients Considered Ideally Suited for Treatments and Procedures after Acute Myocardial Infarction, According to Sex and Race by Study Year.). Approximately 10 percent of patients were classified as ideal candidates for coronary angiography. This percentage was similar in all sex and racial groups and fairly constant over time.

Treatments and Procedures among Ideal Candidates

In the unadjusted analysis, treatment rates differed according to sex and race, with rates highest in white men and lowest in black women (Table 2Table 2Unadjusted Rates of Treatments, Procedures, and Outcomes among Hospitalized Patients, According to Sex, Race, and Study Year.). Differences were larger for rates of reperfusion therapy and coronary angiography, particularly for black women, but smaller for the use of aspirin and beta-blockers. The use of aspirin and beta-blockers increased over time, whereas rates of reperfusion therapy remained stable and those of coronary angiography decreased slightly, with similar time trends in the four demographic groups. As a result, there was no significant variation over time in treatment differences according to sex or race.

Results that were adjusted for the characteristics of patients and hospitals were similar (Table 3Table 3Unadjusted and Adjusted Risk Ratios for Treatments, Procedures, and Outcomes among Hospitalized Patients Classified According to Sex, Race, and Study Year.). Because models 2 and 3 provided almost identical results, only the results of model 3 (adjusted for both patient and hospital characteristics) are presented. The interaction among the factors of sex, race, and year, as well as all other pairwise interactions, were not significant, indicating that racial and sex differences in treatment did not change over time. In absolute terms, black women remained the group with the lowest rate of use of interventions. As compared with white men, the adjusted risk ratio for the use of reperfusion therapy in all years combined was 0.97 for white women, 0.91 for black men, and 0.89 for black women (P<0.001 for all comparisons). For coronary angiography, corresponding estimates were 0.91, 0.82, and 0.76 (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Adjusted differences for the use of aspirin and beta-blockers were small. For the use of aspirin, the risk ratio during the entire period was 0.97 for white women, 0.98 for black men, and 0.94 for black women, as compared with white men (P<0.001 for all comparisons). For the use of beta-blockers, corresponding figures were 0.98 (P<0.001), 1.00 (P=0.55), and 0.96 (P<0.001). Preferences of patients with respect to reperfusion therapy were recorded starting in 1998. These data show few refusals for reperfusion therapy (less than 0.5 percent) in each sex-and-race subgroup.

Analysis of secondary treatment end points indicated lower rates of use of CABG as compared with white men, with an adjusted risk ratio of treatment for white women, black men, and black women of 0.73, 0.74, and 0.63, respectively (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Adjusted differences in rates of PTCA according to sex and race were small, except for black women (risk ratio, 0.89; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.95); white women had slightly higher rates of PTCA than did white men (risk ratio, 1.06; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.08). Data on the use of stents were available starting in 1998. There was a steady increase in stent use over time, from 73.1 percent in 1998 to 87.3 percent in 2000 through 2002. Similar proportions of patients undergoing PTCA received stents regardless of sex or race, with similar time trends. Racial and sex differences in the use of CABG and PTCA did not change over the study period.

Mortality

Overall, 21.7 percent of patients were transferred to other hospitals and excluded from assessment of in-hospital mortality. The proportion of patients who were transferred varied among groups according to race and sex: 23.2 percent for white men, 18.0 percent for white women, 18.3 percent for black men, and 14.4 percent for black women (P<0.001). Among patients who remained in the same hospital, overall unadjusted mortality was 10.2 percent, ranging from 7.3 percent among black men to 12.3 percent among white women (Table 2). After adjustment for differences in age and other characteristics of patients and hospitals, the death rate in hospitals was similar among black men (risk ratio as compared with white men, 0.95; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.00) and white women (risk ratio, 1.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.07), but higher among black women (risk ratio, 1.11; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.16). Racial and sex differences did not change over time.

Discussion

There were notable differences and similarities in the treatment and outcome of myocardial infarction according to race and sex from 1994 through 2002. As compared with white men, fewer black men and black women received reperfusion therapy and coronary angiography, whereas black women had the highest adjusted mortality rate among all sex and racial groups. In contrast, differences in treatment and mortality between white women and white men were generally small, as were differences between any of the four racial and sex groups in the use of aspirin and beta-blockers. Racial and sex differences were essentially unchanged between 1994 and 2002.

Management differences were greater when patients were compared according to race within each sex (black men vs. white men and black women vs. white women) than when they were compared according to sex within each race (black men vs. black women or white men vs. white women), suggesting that disparities according to race may be more important than disparities according to sex. Black women had the highest risk of not receiving reperfusion therapy and coronary angiography. Several previous studies also documented less aggressive management of coronary disease in both women5-11 and blacks.8,9,12,14,15 The few studies that examined subgroups classified according to both sex and race also found the lowest rates among black women.13,26,27

Treatment differences according to sex and race persisted without much variation between 1994 and 2002. Although several studies investigated time trends in management of acute myocardial infarction,28-30 none examined such trends with respect to patients' sex or race. Studies of patients who were referred for cardiovascular evaluation31,32 found little difference in management according to sex, with little variation over time. One study that was based on administrative Medicare databases found smaller differences between blacks and whites in the use of coronary angiography and revascularization procedures in 1997 than in 1986.33 Since results were adjusted only for sex and age, variations over time may reflect variations in the characteristics of patients or in their diagnoses, rather than in patterns of use in health care.

Despite considerable debate, reasons for these differences are largely unknown. Potential explanations are sex and racial differences in eligibility for treatment, clinical contraindications, and confounding by other clinical factors.34 We mostly excluded these possibilities by focusing on ideal candidates and by adjusting for characteristics of patients and hospitals, although some misclassification is possible. It seems unlikely that misclassification affected our conclusions, because such errors should not have occurred differentially according to sex, race, or study year.

The preferences of patients regarding therapy may play some role in the treatment differences that were observed. Data on patients' preferences in NRMI were limited to reperfusion therapy in the latest years; therefore, we could not account for the preferences of patients in our analysis. However, available data indicated very low rates of refusal (less than 0.5 percent) in all sex and racial subgroups. Incomplete information regarding the time of the onset of symptoms could also contribute to differences in reperfusion therapy. These data were more often missing for white women, black men, and black women than they were for white men. To minimize potential bias, only patients with complete information regarding this factor were considered ideal candidates for reperfusion.

Probably, persistent differences in treatments and procedures according to sex and race reflect some unmeasured characteristic of patients or a health care factor that has not changed over time. There may be differences according to sex and race in the early presentation of myocardial infarction that lead to a delayed diagnosis in black women, white women, and black men. This may affect early treatment in these groups, particularly the use of reperfusion. Similarly, unmeasured health care factors may lead to inequalities in the delivery of care among demographic groups. A recent study found that black patients tend to be treated by primary care physicians with lower qualifications and to have less access to subspecialist care, diagnostic imaging, and nonemergency hospital admissions.35 Although these results cannot be extrapolated to acute inpatient care, provider-level differences according to race may exist during an admission for myocardial infarction — for example, the likelihood or timing of referral to a specialist. Hospital-specific effects may also account for a large portion of racial and ethnic disparities in the time to reperfusion therapy,36 suggesting important unmeasured hospital-level factors — perhaps poorer-quality centers treating a disproportionate number of minority-group patients. This, however, is not consistent with our observation of larger treatment disparities, in comparison with white men, for black women than for black men, two groups who presumably have similar rates of use of hospitals that serve members of racial minorities.

The lack of narrowing in some differences in treatment according to sex and race in recent years is a cause for concern. Differences in treatment paralleled to some extent differences in mortality in our study, since black women were also the group with the highest adjusted in-hospital mortality rate. A full understanding of the reasons underlying such differences requires further study.

Although clinical guidelines for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction changed somewhat during the study period, that change should not affect our results, since we focused on patients who, at each time point, were ideal candidates for each intervention and since the definition was the same for each sex and racial subgroup. We lacked information on whether a history of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, or conduction disorders may have limited the use of beta-blockers or whether a history of hypersensitivity to salicylates or active ulcer disease may have discouraged the use of aspirin. There is no reason to expect that these contraindications differed according to sex or race over time. We also lacked data on socioeconomic factors, such as education and employment status, and were unable to separate the role of sex or race from these factors. Information regarding the time of the onset of symptoms was not available for all patients. The quantity of these missing data increased over time in all sex and racial subgroups with similar trends, making it unlikely that missing values introduced bias. Finally, we did not have access to angiographic data, so we cannot exclude the possibility that observed differences in rates of revascularization after coronary angiography reflected overuse of procedures in white men, rather than underuse in other groups of patients. For this reason, rates of revascularization procedures were considered secondary end points.

Differences in some treatments and procedures, particularly reperfusion therapy and coronary angiography, according to sex and race persist after myocardial infarction, with no substantial changes from 1994 to 2002. Black women, the group with the lowest rate of use of interventions, have higher mortality rates than do other groups. Although the reasons for these differences are unknown, their persistence emphasizes the need for a continued search for explanations so that inequities in clinical care may be eliminated.

Supported in part by grants (K24HL077506, K12RR17643, and R01HS10407) from the National Institutes of Health and a training grant (GM07205) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. NRMI is supported by Genentech in South San Francisco, Calif.

Source Information

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology (V.V., N.K.W., J.L.A.) and Division of General Medicine (S.M.), Emory University School of Medicine; and the Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University (V.V.), Atlanta; the Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine (S.S.R., H.M.K.), the Division of Health Policy and Administration, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (H.M.K.), and the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program (H.M.K.) at Yale University School of Medicine and Yale–New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation — both in New Haven, Conn.; the Ovation Research Group, Seattle (P.D.F.); Genentech, South San Francisco, Calif. (H.V.B.); and Hackley Hospital, Spring Lake, Mich. (A.M.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Vaccarino at the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1256 Briarcliff Rd., Suite 1N, Atlanta, GA 30306, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1991;325:221-225
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Steingart RM, Packer M, Hamm P, et al. Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1991;325:226-230
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Wenneker MB, Epstein AM. Racial inequalities in the use of procedures for patients with ischemic heart disease in Massachusetts. JAMA 1989;261:253-257
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Whittle J, Conigliaro J, Good CB, Lofgren RP. Racial differences in the use of invasive cardiovascular procedures in the Department of Veterans Affairs medical system. N Engl J Med 1993;329:621-627
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Yarzebski J, Col N, Pagley P, Savageau J, Gore J, Goldberg R. Gender differences and factors associated with the receipt of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective. Am Heart J 1996;131:43-50
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Kudenchuk PJ, Maynard C, Martin JS, Wirkus M, Weaver WD. Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry). Am J Cardiol 1996;78:9-14
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Gan SC, Beaver SK, Houck PM, MacLehose RF, Lawson HW, Chan L. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality among women and men. N Engl J Med 2000;343:8-15
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Weitzman S, Cooper L, Chambless L, et al. Gender, racial, and geographic differences in the performance of cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for hospitalized acute myocardial infarction in four states. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:722-726
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Stone PH, Thompson B, Anderson HV, et al. Influence of race, sex, and age on management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: the TIMI III registry. JAMA 1996;275:1104-1112
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Kostis JB, Wilson AC, O'Dowd K, et al. Sex differences in the management and long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1994;90:1715-1730
    Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    McLaughlin TJ, Soumerai SB, Willison DJ, et al. Adherence to national guidelines for drug treatment of suspected acute myocardial infarction: evidence for undertreatment in women and the elderly. Arch Intern Med 1996;156:799-805[Erratum, Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1920.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Canto JG, Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, et al. Relation of race and sex to the use of reperfusion therapy in Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1094-1100
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, et al. The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med 1999;340:618-626[Erratum, N Engl J Med 1999;340:1130.]
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Chen J, Rathore SS, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Racial differences in the use of cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1443-1449
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Epstein AM, Weissman JS, Schneider EC, Gatsonis C, Leape LL, Piana RN. Race and gender disparities in rates of cardiac revascularization: do they reflect appropriate use of procedures or problems in quality of care? Med Care 2003;41:1240-1255
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Peterson ED, Wright SM, Daley J, Thibault GE. Racial variation in cardiac procedure use and survival following acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans Affairs. JAMA 1994;271:1175-1180
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Hannan EL, van Ryn M, Burke J, et al. Access to coronary artery bypass surgery by race/ethnicity and gender among patients who are appropriate for surgery. Med Care 1999;37:68-77
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2003.

  19. 19

    Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: understanding and improving health. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2000.

  20. 20

    Rogers WJ, Bowlby LJ, Chandra NC, et al. Treatment of myocardial infarction in the United States (1990 to 1993): observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 1994;90:2103-2114
    Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Every NR, Frederick PD, Robinson M, Sugarman J, Bowlby L, Barron HV. A comparison of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 with the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1886-1894
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Gunnar RM, Passamani ER, Bourdillon PD, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee to Develop Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:249-292
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 1996;94:2341-2350
    Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Ryan TJ, Antman EM. 1999 Update: ACC/AHA guidelines for management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:890-911
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Zhang J, Yu KF. What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998;280:1690-1691
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Arnold AL, Milner KA, Vaccarino V. Sex and race differences in electrocardiogram use (the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey). Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1037-1040
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  27. 27

    Giles WH, Anda RF, Casper ML, Escobedo LG, Taylor HA. Race and sex differences in rates of invasive cardiac procedures in US hospitals: data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:318-324
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Rogers WJ, Canto JC, Lambrew CT, et al. Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1.5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the U.S. from 1990 through 1999. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:2056-2063
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Heidenreich PA, McClellan M. Trends in the treatment and outcomes for acute myocardial infarction: 1975-1995. Am J Med 2001;110:165-174
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    Spencer F, Scleparis G, Goldberg RJ, Yarzebski J, Lessard D, Gore JM. Decade-long trends (1986 to 1997) in the medical treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective. Am Heart J 2001;142:594-603
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Miller TD, Rogers VL, Hodge DO, Hopfenspirger MR, Bailey KR, Gibbons RJ. Gender differences and temporal trends in clinical characteristics, stress test results and use of invasive procedures in patients undergoing evaluation for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:690-697
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Roeters van Lennep JE, Zwinderman AH, Roeters van Lennep HWO, et al. Gender differences in diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease from 1981 to 1997: no evidence for the Yentl syndrome. Eur Heart J 2000;21:911-918
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  33. 33

    Escarce JJ, McGuire TG. Changes in racial differences in use of medical procedures and diagnostic tests among elderly persons: 1986-1997. Am J Public Health 2004;94:1795-1799
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    Rathore SS, Krumholz HM. Differences, disparities, and biases: clarifying racial variations in health care use. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:635-638
    Web of Science | Medline

  35. 35

    Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate RC, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med 2004;351:575-584
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  36. 36

    Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in time to acute reperfusion therapy for patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction. JAMA 2004;292:1563-1572
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (127)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Ruth Lindquist, Jackie L. Boucher, Elizabeth Zane Grey, Beth Cairns, Shalini Bobra, Denise Windenburg, Suma Konety, Kevin Graham, Russell Luepker, Sharonne N. Hayes. (2012) Eliminating untimely deaths of women from heart disease: Highlights from the Minnesota Women's Heart Summit. American Heart Journal 163:1, 39-48.e1
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Si-Hyuck Kang, Jung-Won Suh, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Myeong Chan Cho, Young Jo Kim, Shung Chull Chae, Jung Han Yoon, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Kyoo-Rok Han, Joo Han Kim, Young-Keun Ahn, Myung-Ho Jeong, Hyo-Soo Kim, Dong-Ju Choi. (2011) Sex Differences in Management and Mortality of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction National Registry). The American Journal of Cardiology
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Heena P. Santry, Sherry M. Wren. (2011) The Role of Unconscious Bias in Surgical Safety and Outcomes. Surgical Clinics of North America
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Linda L. Coventry, Judith Finn, Alexandra P. Bremner. (2011) Sex differences in symptom presentation in acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care 40:6, 477-491
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Karen M. Freund, Alice K. Jacobs, Julie A. Pechacek, Hilary F. White, Arlene S. Ash. (2011) Disparities by Race, Ethnicity, and Sex in Treating Acute Coronary Syndromes. Journal of Women's Health111027134441007
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    M. H. E. Bruins Slot, F. H. Rutten, G. J. M. G. van der Heijden, P. A. Doevendans, E. G. Mast, A. C. Bredero, J. F. C. Glatz, A. W. Hoes. (2011) Gender differences in pre-hospital time delay and symptom presentation in patients suspected of acute coronary syndrome in primary care. Family Practice
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    H. Mollmann, C. Liebetrau, H. M. Nef, C. W. Hamm. (2011) The Swedish paradox: or is there really no gender difference in acute coronary syndromes?. European Heart Journal
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Erin M. Galbraith, Puja K. Mehta, Emir Veledar, Viola Vaccarino, Nanette K. Wenger. (2011) Women and Heart Disease: Knowledge, Worry, and Motivation. Journal of Women's Health 20:10, 1529-1534
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    T. A. Meadows, D. L. Bhatt, C. P. Cannon, B. J. Gersh, J. Rother, S. Goto, C.-S. Liau, P. W. F. Wilson, G. Salette, S. C. Smith, P. G. Steg, . (2011) Ethnic Differences in Cardiovascular Risks and Mortality in Atherothrombotic Disease: Insights From the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 86:10, 960-967
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Masaharu Ishihara, Ichiro Inoue, Takuji Kawagoe, Yuji Shimatani, Fumiharu Miura, Yasuharu Nakama, Kazuoki Dai, Takayuki Ootani, Kuniomi Ooi, Hiroki Ikenaga, Takashi Miki, Masayuki Nakamura, Shinji Kishimoto, Youji Sumimoto. (2011) Comparison of Gender-Specific Mortality in Patients <70 Years Versus ≥70 Years Old With Acute Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology 108:6, 772-775
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    John H. Sampson, Carlos A. Bagley, Benjamin S. Carson. (2011) Editorial. Journal of Neurosurgery1-2
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    A. K. Mathur, D. E. Schaubel, Qi Gong, M. K. Guidinger, R. M. Merion. (2011) Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Transplant Rates in the United States. American Journal of Transplantation 11:7, 1435-1443
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Rachel Dreyer, Margaret Arstall, Rosanna Tavella, Claire Morgan, Andrew Weekes, John Beltrame. (2011) Gender Differences in Patients with Stable Angina attending Primary Care Practices. Heart, Lung and Circulation 20:7, 452-459
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Abdullah S. Assiri. (2011) Gender differences in clinical presentation and management of patients with acute coronary syndrome in Southwest of Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Saudi Heart Association 23:3, 135-141
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Maryanne Hartzell, Rajeev Malhotra, Kibar Yared, Hannah R. Rosenfield, Jennifer D. Walker, Malissa J. Wood. (2011) Effect of Gender on Treatment and Outcomes in Severe Aortic Stenosis†Drs. Hartzell and Malhotra contributed equally to this article.. The American Journal of Cardiology 107:11, 1681-1686
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    R. Bugiardini, A. T. Yan, R. T. Yan, D. Fitchett, A. Langer, O. Manfrini, S. G. Goodman, . (2011) Factors influencing underutilization of evidence-based therapies in women. European Heart Journal 32:11, 1337-1344
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Joseph Sweeny, Roxana Mehran. (2011) Gender outcomes in acute myocardial infarction: are women from Venus and men from Mars?. EuroIntervention 6:9, 1029-1031
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Christopher R. Friese, Craig C. Earle, Lysa S. Magazu, Jennifer R. Brown, Bridget A. Neville, Nathanael D. Hevelone, Lisa C. Richardson, Gregory A. Abel. (2011) Timeliness and quality of diagnostic care for medicare recipients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer 117:7, 1470-1477
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Krishna G. Aragam, Mauro Moscucci, Dean E. Smith, Arthur L. Riba, Mark Zainea, James L. Chambers, David Share, Hitinder S. Gurm. (2011) Trends and disparities in referral to cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention. American Heart Journal 161:3, 544-551.e2
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Bruce Ovbiagele, Daniela Markovic, Gregg C. Fonarow. (2011) Recent US Patterns and Predictors of Prevalent Diabetes among Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients. Cardiology Research and Practice 2011, 1-8
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Arthur E. Stillman, Matthijs Oudkerk, David Bluemke, Jens Bremerich, Fabio P. Esteves, Ernest V. Garcia, Matthias Gutberlet, W. Gregory Hundley, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Dirkjan Kuijpers, Raymond K. Kwong, Eike Nagel, Stamatios Lerakis, John Oshinski, Jean-François Paul, Richard Underwood, Bernd J. Wintersperger, Michael R. Rees. (2011) Assessment of acute myocardial infarction: current status and recommendations from the North American society for cardiovascular imaging and the European society of cardiac radiology. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 27:1, 7-24
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Jonathan M Coutinho, Eva C Klaver, Yvo B Roos, Jan Stam, Paul J Nederkoorn. (2011) Ethnicity and thrombolysis in ischemic stroke: a hospital based study in Amsterdam. BMC Neurology 11:1, 81
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Lynn Nugent, Puja K. Mehta, C. Noel Bairey Merz. (2011) Gender and microvascular angina. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 31:1, 37-46
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    SeungHye Han, Greg S Martin, James P Maloney, Carl Shanholtz, Kathleen C Barnes, Stacey Murray, Jonathan E Sevransky. (2011) Short women with severe sepsis-related acute lung injury receive lung protective ventilation less frequently: an observational cohort study. Critical Care 15:6, R262
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Dan Benhamou. (2010) Sex-based differences in local anaesthetic-induced motor block. European Journal of Anaesthesiology1
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Najwa Ouhoummane, Belkacem Abdous, Rabia Louchini, Louis Rochette, Paul Poirier. (2010) Trends in postacute myocardial infarction management and mortality in patients with diabetes. A population-based study from 1995 to 2001. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 26:10, 523-531
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Ashish K. Jha, Roslyn Stone, Judith Lave, Huanyu Chen, Heather Klusaritz, Kevin Volpp. (2010) The Concentration of Hospital Care for Black Veterans in Veterans Affairs Hospitals: Implications for Clinical Outcomes. Journal for Healthcare Quality 32:6, 52-61
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Jane G. Wigginton, Paul E. Pepe, Ahamed H. Idris. (2010) Rationale for routine and immediate administration of intravenous estrogen for all critically ill and injured patients. Critical Care Medicine 38, S620-S629
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Rebekah L. Gardner, Richard Almeida, Judith H. Maselli, Andrew Auerbach. (2010) Does Gender Influence Emergency Department Management and Outcomes in Geriatric Abdominal Pain?. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 39:3, 275-281
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Hoa L. Nguyen, Robert J. Goldberg, Joel M. Gore, Keith A.A. Fox, Kim A. Eagle, Enrique P. Gurfinkel, Frederick A. Spencer, George Reed, Ann Quill, Frederick A. Anderson. (2010) Age and sex differences, and changing trends, in the use of evidence-based therapies in acute coronary syndromes: perspectives from a multinational registry. Coronary Artery Disease 21:6, 336-344
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Lenny López, Andrew P. Wilper, Marina C. Cervantes, Joseph R. Betancourt, Alexander R. Green. (2010) Racial and Sex Differences in Emergency Department Triage Assessment and Test Ordering for Chest Pain, 1997-2006. Academic Emergency Medicine 17:8, 801-808
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Antonia Sambola, Nuria Fernández-Hidalgo, Benito Almirante, Ivo Roca, Teresa González-Alujas, Bernard Serra, Albert Pahissa, David García-Dorado, Pilar Tornos. (2010) Sex Differences in Native-Valve Infective Endocarditis in a Single Tertiary-Care Hospital. The American Journal of Cardiology 106:1, 92-98
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Seth W. Glickman, Charles B. Cairns, Anita Y. Chen, Eric D. Peterson, Matthew T. Roe. (2010) Delays in fibrinolysis as primary reperfusion therapy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal 159:6, 998-1004.e2
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Seth W. Glickman, Charles B. Cairns, Ronny M. Otero, Christopher W. Woods, Ephraim L. Tsalik, Raymond J. Langley, Jennifer C. van Velkinburgh, Lawrence P. Park, Lawrence T. Glickman, Vance G. Fowler, Stephen F. Kingsmore, Emanuel P. Rivers. (2010) Disease Progression in Hemodynamically Stable Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Sepsis. Academic Emergency Medicine 17:4, 383-390
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Alexis A. Topjian, A. Russell Localio, Robert A. Berg, Evaline A. Alessandrini, Peter A. Meaney, Paul E. Pepe, G. Luke Larkin, Mary Ann Peberdy, Lance B. Becker, Vinay M. Nadkarni. (2010) Women of child-bearing age have better in-hospital cardiac arrest survival outcomes than do equal-aged men. Critical Care Medicine1
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Bruce H. Wade, Jack H. Stone. (2010) Overcoming Disciplinary and Institutional Barriers: An Interdisciplinary Course in Economic and Sociological Perspectives on Health Issues. The Journal of Economic Education 41:1, 71-84
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Zachary F. Meisel, Katrina Armstrong, C. Crawford Mechem, Frances S. Shofer, Nick Peacock, Kim Facenda, Charles V. Pollack. (2010) Influence of Sex on the Out-of-hospital Management of Chest Pain. Academic Emergency Medicine 17:1, 80-87
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Mirjam Zandstra, Eva Stekkinger, Maureen J. van der Vlugt, Arie P. van Dijk, Frederik K. Lotgering, Marc E. A. Spaanderman. (2010) Cardiac Diastolic Dysfunction and Metabolic Syndrome in Young Women After Placental Syndrome. Obstetrics & Gynecology 115:1, 101-108
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Nicolas Lerolle, Ludovic Trinquart, Caroline Bornstain, Jean-Marc Tadié, Audrey Imbert, Jean-Luc Diehl, Jean-Yves Fagon, Emmanuel Guérot. (2010) Increased intensity of treatment and decreased mortality in elderly patients in an intensive care unit over a decade*. Critical Care Medicine 38:1, 59-64
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Kristy A. Bauman, MeiLan K. Han. 2010. Gender Differences in Susceptibility, Outcomes, and Pathophysiology of Sepsis. , 291-301.
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Jürgen Barth, Andreas Volz, Jean-Paul Schmid, Sonja Kohls, Roland von Kǎnel, Hansjörg Znoj, Hugo Saner. (2009) Gender Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes: Do Women Benefit Equally in Psychological Health?. Journal of Women's Health 18:12, 2033-2039
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    A. Hvelplund, S. Galatius, M. Madsen, J. N. Rasmussen, S. Rasmussen, J. K. Madsen, N. P.R. Sand, H.-H. Tilsted, P. Thayssen, E. Sindby, S. Hojbjerg, S. Z. Abildstrom. (2009) Women with acute coronary syndrome are less invasively examined and subsequently less treated than men. European Heart Journal
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Mladen I. Vidovich, Yuan Xu. (2009) Cost and length of hospitalization in Hispanic patients with acute myocardial infarction in the United States. International Journal of Cardiology 137:3, 302-303
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Brandon M. Meyers, Tasnim Vira, Chi-Ming Chow, Beth L. Abramson. (2009) Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and primary percutaneous coronary intervention choices in patients with similar coronary anatomy: A computer-based simulation examines the sex gap. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 25:11, 649-653
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Kevin M. Takakuwa, Gregory A. Burek, Adrian T. Estepa, Frances S. Shofer. (2009) A Method for Improving Arrival-to-electrocardiogram Time in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients and the Effect on Door-to-balloon Time for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Academic Emergency Medicine 16:10, 921-927
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Alain Combes, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Jean-Louis Trouillet, Ania Nieszkowska, Jean Chastre. (2009) Gender impact on the outcomes of critically ill patients with nosocomial infections*. Critical Care Medicine 37:9, 2506-2511
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Mary S. Vaughan Sarrazin, Mary E. Campbell, Kelly K. Richardson, Gary E. Rosenthal. (2009) Racial Segregation and Disparities in Health Care Delivery: Conceptual Model and Empirical Assessment. Health Services Research 44:4, 1424-1444
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Samuel W. Joffe, Armen Chalian, Dennis A. Tighe, Gerard P. Aurigemma, Jorge Yarzebski, Joel M. Gore, Darleen Lessard, Robert J. Goldberg. (2009) Trends in the use of echocardiography and left ventriculography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal 158:2, 185-192
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Chiara Melloni, L Kristin Newby. (2009) Sex differences in medical care after acute myocardial infarction: what can be done to address the problem?. Women's Health 5:4, 339-341
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    N. Ouhoummane, B. Abdous, V. Émond, P. Poirier. (2009) Impact of diabetes and gender on survival after acute myocardial infarction in the Province of Quebec, Canada-a population-based study. Diabetic Medicine 26:6, 609-616
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Stephanie Wheeler, Jennie D. Bowen, Charles Maynard, Elliot Lowy, Haili Sun, Anne E. Sales, Nicholas L. Smith, Stephan D. Fihn. (2009) Women Veterans and Outcomes after Acute Myocardial Infarction. Journal of Women's Health 18:5, 613-618
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Ayman A El-Menyar, Jassim Al Suwaidi. (2009) Impact of gender in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 7:4, 411-421
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Susmita Parashar, Ronit Katz, Nicholas L. Smith, Alice M. Arnold, Viola Vaccarino, Nanette K. Wenger, John S. Gottdiener. (2009) Race, Gender, and Mortality in Adults ≥65 Years of Age With Incident Heart Failure (from the Cardiovascular Health Study). The American Journal of Cardiology 103:8, 1120-1127
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    A. Martling, F. Granath, B. Cedermark, R. Johansson, T. Holm. (2009) Gender differences in the treatment of rectal cancer: A population based study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO) 35:4, 427-433
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Sheena Kayaniyil, Chris I. Ardern, Jane Winstanley, Cynthia Parsons, Stephanie Brister, Paul Oh, Donna E. Stewart, Sherry L. Grace. (2009) Degree and correlates of cardiac knowledge and awareness among cardiac inpatients. Patient Education and Counseling 75:1, 99-107
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Carlos Lahoz, Teresa Mantilla, Manuel Taboada, Begoña Soler, Salvador Tranche, Isidro López-Rodriguez, Beatriz Monteiro, Raquel Martin-Jadraque, Miguel A. Sanchez-Zamorano, Jose M. Mostaza. (2009) Gender differences in evidence-based pharmacological therapy for patients with stable coronary heart disease. International Journal of Cardiology 133:3, 336-340
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Paul S. Chan, John D. Birkmeyer, Harlan M. Krumholz, John A. Spertus, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu. (2009) Racial and Gender Trends in the Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Among Medicare Beneficiaries Between 1997 and 2003. Congestive Heart Failure 15:2, 51-57
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Christopher R. Friese, Gregory A. Abel, Lysa S. Magazu, Bridget A. Neville, Lisa C. Richardson, Craig C. Earle. (2009) Diagnostic delay and complications for older adults with multiple myeloma. Leukemia & Lymphoma 50:3, 392-400
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Hye-Sun Ro, Richard S. Wampler. (2009) What’s Wrong With These People? Clinicians’ Views of Clinical Couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 35:1, 3-17
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Frederick Millham, Nitin B. Jain. (2009) Are There Racial Disparities in Trauma Care?. World Journal of Surgery 33:1, 23-33
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Jared Wasser, Robert J. Goldberg, Frederick A. Spencer, Jorge Yarzebski, Joel M. Gore. (2009) Multidecade-long trends (1986–2005) in the utilization of coronary reperfusion and revascularization treatment strategies in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective. Coronary Artery Disease 20:1, 71-80
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Nausheen Akhter, Sarah Milford-Beland, Matthew T. Roe, Robert N. Piana, John Kao, Adhir Shroff. (2009) Gender differences among patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR). American Heart Journal 157:1, 141-148
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    William J. Rogers, Paul D. Frederick, Edna Stoehr, John G. Canto, Joseph P. Ornato, C. Michael Gibson, Charles V. Pollack, Joel M. Gore, Nisha Chandra-Strobos, Eric D. Peterson, William J. French. (2008) Trends in presenting characteristics and hospital mortality among patients with ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. American Heart Journal 156:6, 1026-1034
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Eric D. Peterson, Bimal R. Shah, Lori Parsons, Charles V. Pollack, William J. French, John G. Canto, C. Michael Gibson, William J. Rogers. (2008) Trends in quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. American Heart Journal 156:6, 1045-1055
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Susanna Mak. (2008) Intracoronary 17 β -Estradiol and the Inotropic Response to Dobutamine in Postmenopausal Women. Journal of Women's Health 17:9, 1499-1503
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Dae Hyun Kim, Constantine Daskalakis, Andrew N. Lee, Suzanne Adams, Sam Hohmann, Scott C. Silvestry, Sofia Medvedev, David J. Whellan. (2008) Racial Disparity in the Relationship Between Hospital Volume and Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Annals of Surgery 248:5, 886-892
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    G. Ringbäck Weitoft, M. Rosén, Ö. Ericsson, R. Ljung. (2008) Education and drug use in Sweden-a nationwide register-based study. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 17:10, 1020-1028
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Kate Jolly, Paramjit Gill. (2008) Ethnicity and cardiovascular disease prevention: practical clinical considerations. Current Opinion in Cardiology 23:5, 465-470
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Ellen B. Fung, Paul R. Harmatz, Meredith Milet, Vinod Balasa, Samir K. Ballas, James F. Casella, Lee Hilliard, Abdullah Kutlar, Kenneth L. McClain, Nancy F. Olivieri, John B. Porter, Elliott P. Vichinsky, . (2008) Disparity in the management of iron overload between patients with sickle cell disease and thalassemia who received transfusions. Transfusion 48:9, 1971-1980
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    John F. Dovidio, Louis A. Penner, Terrance L. Albrecht, Wynne E. Norton, Samuel L. Gaertner, J. Nicole Shelton. (2008) Disparities and distrust: The implications of psychological processes for understanding racial disparities in health and health care. Social Science & Medicine 67:3, 478-486
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Michael M. Vigoda, Luis I. Rodríguez, Eric Wu, Kevin Perry, Robert Duncan, David J. Birnbach, David A. Lubarsky. (2008) The Use of an Anesthesia Information System to Identify and Trend Gender Disparities in Outpatient Medical Management of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Anesthesia & Analgesia 107:1, 185-192
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Kevin M. Takakuwa, Frances S. Shofer, Alexander T. Limkakeng, Judd E. Hollander. (2008) Preferences for cardiac tests and procedures may partially explain sex but not race disparities. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 26:5, 545-550
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    RODERICK K. KING, ALEXANDER R. GREEN, ASWITA TAN-McGRORY, ELIZABETH J. DONAHUE, JESSIE KIMBROUGH-SUGICK, JOSEPH R. BETANCOURT. (2008) A Plan for Action: Key Perspectives from the Racial/Ethnic Disparities Strategy Forum. The Milbank Quarterly 86:2, 241-272
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Marietta Anthony, Kwan Y. Lee, Carl T. Bertram, Jacob Abarca, Rick A. Rehfeld, Daniel C. Malone, Marlene Freeman, Raymond L. Woosley. (2008) Gender and Age Differences in Medications Dispensed from a National Chain Drugstore. Journal of Women's Health 17:5, 735-743
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Earl S. Ford, Ali H. Mokdad, Chaoyang Li, Lisa C. McGuire, Tara W. Strine, Catherine A. Okoro, David W. Brown, Matthew M. Zack. (2008) Gender Differences in Coronary Heart Disease and Health-Related Quality of Life: Findings from 10 States from the 2004 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Journal of Women's Health 17:5, 757-768
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Nsikak J. Umoh, Eddy Fan, Pedro A. Mendez-Tellez, Jonathan E. Sevransky, Cheryl R. Dennison, Carl Shanholtz, Peter J. Pronovost, Dale M. Needham. (2008) Patient and intensive care unit organizational factors associated with low tidal volume ventilation in acute lung injury*. Critical Care Medicine 36:5, 1463-1468
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    John T. Nguyen, Alan K. Berger, Sue Duval, Russell V. Luepker. (2008) Gender disparity in cardiac procedures and medication use for acute myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal 155:5, 862-868
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Camille A. Pearte, Merle Myerson, Joseph Coresh, Robert L. McNamara, Wayne Rosamond, Herman Taylor, Teri A. Manolio. (2008) Variation and Temporal Trends in the Use of Diagnostic Testing During Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction by Age, Gender, Race, and Geography (the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities Study). The American Journal of Cardiology 101:9, 1219-1225
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    G. Ringbäck Weitoft, Ö. Ericsson, E. Löfroth, M. Rosén. (2008) Equal access to treatment? Population-based follow-up of drugs dispensed to patients after acute myocardial infarction in Sweden. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 64:4, 417-424
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Soko Setoguchi, Robert J. Glynn, Jerry Avorn, Murray A. Mittleman, Raisa Levin, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer. (2008) Improvements in Long-Term Mortality After Myocardial Infarction and Increased Use of Cardiovascular Drugs After Discharge. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 51:13, 1247-1254
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    Michael A. Crilly, Peter E. Bundred, Lisa C. Leckey, Fiona C. Johnstone. (2008) Gender Bias in the Clinical Management of Women with Angina: Another Look at the Yentl Syndrome. Journal of Women's Health 17:3, 331-342
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Paul A. Santolucito, Dennis A. Tighe, Darleen Lessard, Rovshan M. Ismailov, Joel M. Gore, Jorge Yarzebski, Robert J. Goldberg. (2008) Changing trends in the evaluation of ejection fraction in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: The Worcester Heart Attack Study. American Heart Journal 155:3, 485-493
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Cary P. Gross, Benjamin D. Smith, Elizabeth Wolf, Martin Andersen. (2008) Racial disparities in cancer therapy. Cancer 112:4, 900-908
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    N K Wenger, L J Shaw, V Vaccarino. (2008) Coronary Heart Disease in Women: Update 2008. Clinical Pharmacology &#38; Therapeutics 83:1, 37-51
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    Arthur L. Riba. (2008) Evidence-Based Performance and Quality Improvement in the Acute Cardiac Care Setting. Critical Care Clinics 24:1, 201-229
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Michael W. Tempelhof, L Kristin Newby. (2008) Platelet Inhibitors. Cardiology in Review 16:1, 23-29
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Louis A. Penner, Terrance L. Albrecht, Donyell K. Coleman, Wynne E. Norton. (2007) Interpersonal Perspectives on Black-White Health Disparities: Social Policy Implications. Social Issues and Policy Review 1:1, 63-98
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Shearwood McClelland, Colleen C. Curran, Cynthia S. Davey, Kolawole S. Okuyemi. (2007) Intractable pediatric temporal lobe epilepsy in the United States: examination of race, age, sex, and insurance status as factors predicting receipt of resective treatment. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics 107:6, 469-473
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    Cheryl L. Robbins, Irene Padavic. (2007) Structural Influences on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Women's Health Care. Sociology Compass 1:2, 682-700
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Soko Setoguchi, Robert J. Glynn, Jerry Avorn, Raisa Levin, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer. (2007) Ten-Year Trends of Cardiovascular Drug Use After Myocardial Infarction Among Community-Dwelling Persons ≥65 Years of Age. The American Journal of Cardiology 100:7, 1061-1067
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Kevin G. Volpp, Roslyn Stone, Judith R. Lave, Ashish K. Jha, Mark Pauly, Heather Klusaritz, Huanyu Chen, Liyi Cen, Nancy Brucker, Daniel Polsky. (2007) Is Thirty-Day Hospital Mortality Really Lower for Black Veterans Compared with White Veterans?. Health Services Research 42:4, 1613-1631
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Martha E. Blaney, Susan M. Morris, Lori Parsons, Dave P. Miller, John G. Canto, Hal V. Barron, Harlan M. Krumholz. (2007) Acute Reperfusion Therapy in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction from 1994-2003. The American Journal of Medicine 120:8, 693.e1-693.e8
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    Tracy Y. Wang, Anita Y. Chen, Matthew T. Roe, Karen P. Alexander, L. Kristin Newby, Sidney C. Smith, Sripal Bangalore, W. Brian Gibler, E. Magnus Ohman, Eric D. Peterson. (2007) Comparison of Baseline Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Asian Versus Non-Asian White Americans With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative. The American Journal of Cardiology 100:3, 391-396
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    Mary Beth O'Connell, Eli J Korner, Nathaniel M Rickles, Jeri J Sias. (2007) Cultural Competence in Health Care and Its Implications for Pharmacy Part 1. Overview of Key Concepts in Multicultural Health Care. Pharmacotherapy 27:7, 1062-1079
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    Michael P. Porter, Daniel W. Lin. (2007) Trends in renal cancer surgery and patient provider characteristics associated with partial nephrectomy in the United States. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 25:4, 298-302
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    James F. Jackson, Asher Kornbluth. (2007) Do Black and Hispanic Americans With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Receive Inferior Care Compared With White Americans? Uneasy Questions and Speculations. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 102:7, 1343-1349
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    Sande O. Okelo, Albert W. Wu, Barry Merriman, Jerry A. Krishnan, Gregory B. Diette. (2007) Are Physician Estimates of Asthma Severity Less Accurate in Black than in White Patients?. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22:7, 976-981
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    Josep Lupón, Agustín Urrutia, Beatriz González, Crisanto Díez, Salvador Altimir, Carlos Albaladejo, Teresa Pascual, Celestino Rey-Joly, Vicente Valle. (2007) Does Heart Failure Therapy Differ According to Patient Sex?. Clinical Cardiology 30:6, 301-305
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Bonnie K. Sanderson, Saema Mirza, Rachel Fry, Jeroan J. Allison, Vera Bittner. (2007) Secondary prevention outcomes among black and white cardiac rehabilitation patients. American Heart Journal 153:6, 980-986
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    JOSHUA A. JACOBI, SHAILJA V. PARIKH, DARREN K. McGUIRE, JAMES A. DELEMOS, SABINA A. MURPHY, ELLEN C. KEELEY. (2007) Racial Disparity in Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Influence of Process of Care. Journal of Interventional Cardiology 20:3, 182-187
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Viktor Y. Dombrovskiy, Andrew A. Martin, Jagadeeshan Sunderram, Harold L. Paz. (2007) Rapid increase in hospitalization and mortality rates for severe sepsis in the United States: A trend analysis from 1993 to 2003*. Critical Care Medicine 35:5, 1244-1250
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    Ashish K. Jha, Douglas O. Staiger, F. Lee Lucas, Amitabh Chandra. (2007) Do race-specific models explain disparities in treatments after acute myocardial infarction?. American Heart Journal 153:5, 785-791
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    Jessica Hahn, Darleen Lessard, Jorge Yarzebski, Jordan Goldberg, Sean Pruell, Frederick A. Spencer, Joel M. Gore, Robert J. Goldberg. (2007) A community-wide perspective into changing trends in the utilization of diagnostic and interventional procedures in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal 153:4, 594-605
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    David W. Brown, Jipan Xie, George A. Mensah. (2007) Electrocardiographic Recording and Timeliness of Clinician Evaluation in the Emergency Department in Patients Presenting With Chest Pain. The American Journal of Cardiology 99:8, 1115-1118
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    G Y H Lip, A H Barnett, A Bradbury, F P Cappuccio, P S Gill, E Hughes, C Imray, K Jolly, K Patel. (2007) Ethnicity and cardiovascular disease prevention in the United Kingdom: a practical approach to management. Journal of Human Hypertension 21:3, 183-211
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    Rahman Shah, Yun Wang, Frederick A. Masoudi, JoAnne M. Foody. (2007) Sex and Racial Differences in Outcomes and Guideline-Based Management of Troponin-Only-Positive Acute Myocardial Infarction in Older Persons. The American Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 16:2, 97-105
    CrossRef

  107. 107

    Daniel P. Schauer, Joseph A. Johnston, Charles J. Moomaw, Mark Wess, Mark H. Eckman. (2007) Racial Disparities in the Filling of Warfarin Prescriptions for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 333:2, 67-73
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    Elena Aldasoro, Montse Calvo, Santiago Esnaola, Iraida Hurtado de Saracho, Eva Alonso, Covadonga Audicana, Fernando Arós, Iñaki Lekuona, José M. Arteagoitia, Mikel Basterretxea, Jaime Marrugat. (2007) Diferencias de género en el tratamiento de revascularización precoz del infarto agudo de miocardio. Medicina Clínica 128:3, 81-85
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    Hajir Dilmanian, Wilbert S. Aronow, Manisha Das, Anthony L. Pucillo, Melvin B. Weiss, Kumar Kalapatapu, Craig E. Monsen. (2007) In-Hospital Mortality and Time from Onset of Symptoms of Acute Myocardial Infarction in 540 Patients Undergoing Primary Coronary Angioplasty. Cardiology 107:2, 107-110
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    Cherri Hobgood, Susan Sawning, Josie Bowen, Katherine Savage. (2006) Teaching Culturally Appropriate Care: A Review of Educational Models and Methods. Academic Emergency Medicine 13:12, 1288-1295
    CrossRef

  111. 111

    Carole Decker. (2006) Quality Indicators. Cardiology in Review 14:6, 308-311
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    Jennifer J. Manly. (2006) Deconstructing Race and Ethnicity. Medical Care 44:Suppl 3, S10-S16
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    Somnath Saha. (2006) The Inherent Inequities of Market-Based Health Care Reform. Journal of General Internal Medicine 21:11, 1211-1212
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    Harlan M. Krumholz, Frederick A. Masoudi. (2006) The Year in Epidemiology, Health Services Research, and Outcomes Research. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 48:9, 1886-1895
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    Suraj Joshy, Amit Datta, Anthony Perera, Boban Thomas, Nitish Gogi, Binod Kumar Singh. (2006) Ethnic differences in preoperative function of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics 30:5, 426-428
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    Mark R. Cullen, Sally Vegso, Linda Cantley, Deron Galusha, Peter Rabinowitz, Oyebode Taiwo, Martha Fiellin, David Wennberg, Joanne Iennaco, Martin D. Slade, Kanta Sircar. (2006) Use of Medical Insurance Claims Data for Occupational Health Research. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 48:10, 1054-1061
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    Erik Lillquist, Charles A. Sullivan. (2006) Legal Regulation of the Use of Race in Medical Research. The Journal of Law, Medicine <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Ethics 34:3, 535-551
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    Joseph R. Betancourt. (2006) Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care: What Is the Role of Academic Medicine?. Academic Medicine 81:9, 788-792
    CrossRef

  119. 119

    Marilyn G. Foreman, Sandra K. Willsie. (2006) Health Care Disparities in Critical Illness. Clinics in Chest Medicine 27:3, 473-486
    CrossRef

  120. 120

    María J. Aguado-Romeo, Soledad Márquez-Calderón, María L. Buzón-Barrera. (2006) Diferencias entre mujeres y varones en el acceso a procedimientos cardiovasculares intervencionistas en los hospitales públicos de Andalucía. Revista Española de Cardiología 59:8, 785-793
    CrossRef

  121. 121

    Kevin M. Takakuwa, Frances S. Shofer, Judd E. Hollander. (2006) The Influence of Race and Gender on Time to Initial Electrocardiogram for Patients with Chest Pain. Academic Emergency Medicine 13:8, 867-872
    CrossRef

  122. 122

    Rosa A. Hernández Antolín, José E. Rodríguez Hernández. (2006) Estrategias de revascularización: importancia del sexo. Revista Española de Cardiología 59:5, 487-501
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    Saif S. Rathore, Andrew J. Epstein, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Harlan M. Krumholz. (2006) Regionalization of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Care. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 47:7, 1346-1349
    CrossRef

  124. 124

    Asch, Steven M., Kerr, Eve A., Keesey, Joan, Adams, John L., Setodji, Claude M., Malik, Shaista, McGlynn, Elizabeth A., . (2006) Who Is at Greatest Risk for Receiving Poor-Quality Health Care?. New England Journal of Medicine 354:11, 1147-1156
    Full Text

  125. 125

    Bina Ahmed, C Noel Bairey Merz, George Sopko. (2006) Are we ‘WISE’r? Findings from the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation study. Women's Health 2:1, 57-64
    CrossRef

  126. 126

    (2005) Trends in Racial Disparities in Care. New England Journal of Medicine 353:19, 2081-2085
    Full Text

  127. 127

    Lurie, Nicole, . (2005) Health Disparities — Less Talk, More Action. New England Journal of Medicine 353:7, 727-729
    Full Text

Letters