Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Perspective

The Signature Features of Influenza Pandemics — Implications for Policy

Mark A. Miller, M.D., Cecile Viboud, Ph.D., Marta Balinska, Ph.D., and Lone Simonsen, Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 2009; 360:2595-2598June 18, 2009

Article

Vast amounts of time and resources are being invested in planning for the next influenza pandemic, and one may indeed have already begun. Data from past pandemics can provide useful insights for current and future planning. Having conducted archeo-epidemiologic research, we can clarify certain “signature features” of three previous influenza pandemics — A/H1N1 from 1918 through 1919, A/H2N2 from 1957 through 1963, and A/H3N2 from 1968 through 1970 — that should inform both national plans for pandemic preparedness and required international collaborations.

Past pandemics were characterized by a shift in the virus subtype, shifts of the highest death rates to younger populations, successive pandemic waves, higher transmissibility than that of seasonal influenza, and differences in impact in different geographic regions. Although influenza pandemics are classically defined by the first of these features, the other four characteristics are frequently not considered in response plans.

Yet the second feature, the shift in mortality toward younger age groups, was the most striking characteristic of the 20th-century pandemics.1,2 Exposure to influenza A/H1 subtypes before 1873 may have offered some protection to adults over 45 years of age during the pandemic of 1918 and 1919. A similar mechanism of antigen recycling might explain the partial protection against influenza-related death that was observed among people over 77 years of age during the 1968–1970 pandemic — a possibility supported by the prepandemic presence of antibodies to H3, which were isolated in people born before 1892.1 Another possible mechanism is immune potentiation, leading to an increased likelihood of lethal outcomes after influenza infection in specific age groups. Still other hypotheses include the possibility of bacterial superinfection due to asymmetric carriage rates, given that higher rates were found among young people in 1918 and 1919.1,2 Although the elderly frequently have the highest death rates during seasonal epidemics, their relative sparing during pandemics has not been generally appreciated. Advance knowledge of which subpopulations are most likely to be at increased risk for death can shape the optimization of control strategies.

The third feature, a pattern of multiple waves, characterized all three 20th-century pandemics, each of which caused increased mortality for 2 to 5 years (see chartMortality Distributions and Timing of Waves of Previous Influenza Pandemics.).1 The lethal wave in the autumn of 1918 was preceded by a first wave in the summer that led to substantial morbidity but relatively low mortality in both the United States and Europe. Recent studies suggest that these early mild outbreaks partially immunized the population, decreasing the mortality impact of the main pandemic wave in the fall of 1918.2 In the United States, the 1957 influenza A/H2 pandemic had three waves in the United States, with notable excess mortality in the nonsuccessive winter seasons of 1959 and 1962 — the latter being 5 years after the initial emergence of the pandemic strain.1 From 1968 through 1970, Eurasia had a mild first influenza season, with the full effects on morbidity and mortality occurring in the second season of pandemic-virus circulation. The reasons for multiple waves of varying impact are not precisely understood, but they probably include adaptation of the virus to its new host, demographic or geographic variation, seasonality, and the overall immunity of the population.1,2 The occurrence of multiple waves potentially provides time for health authorities to implement control strategies for successive waves.

Increased transmissibility of influenza because of high susceptibility of the population, the fourth feature, has also been documented for all the past pandemics, although estimates of reproductive numbers — a measure of the average number of secondary infections caused by each individual case — vary considerably among studies and pandemics.2,3 Recent studies suggest that during the early mild wave of the 1918–1919 pandemic, the reproductive number (i.e., the number of new cases attributable to a single established case) may have ranged between 2 and 5,2,3 as compared with the average of 1.3 for seasonal influenza. Since models of containment and pandemic control assumed lower reproductive numbers for the current epidemic than those that have been historically observed, they are likely to be overly optimistic regarding the success of containment strategies.

Great heterogeneity among regions in terms of incidence and mortality is also a characteristic of pandemics. This variability is probably explained by the complex heterogeneity in the degree of immunity in local populations to the circulating influenza strains, as well as by transmission factors such as geographic conditions, social mixing, degree of viral infectiousness, and “seasonal forcing” (small seasonal changes in the effective transmission rate).4 The benefits of sharing data on all these variables provide major incentives for international collaboration.

Although the A/H5N1 influenza subtype has spread to avian populations in more than 30 countries and infected nearly 400 persons, with a case fatality rate above 50%, scientists disagree about its pandemic potential. Such a highly pathogenic virus does not usually adapt well to its host, since it tends to kill faster than it can be transmitted. Other avian subtypes are also considered to be pandemic threats. Although avian viruses have a different tropism for respiratory cellular receptors in birds than for those in humans, gradual viral mutations or gene-segment reassortments in a mammal “mixing vessel” could result in a novel viral clade or subtype that spreads rapidly in a population that has largely not previously been exposed to it. Such changes may have occurred in the current swine H1N1 circulating strain.

The death toll of a future pandemic depends not only on the virulence of the virus in question but also on the rapidity with which we are able to introduce effective preventive and therapeutic measures. Although A/H5N1 has been associated with a “cytokine-storm” phenomenon reminiscent of that observed in 1918 and 1919, new methods for the timely manufacture and administration of antiviral agents and influenza and pneumococcal vaccines could mitigate the effects of a pandemic.

The evidence of multiple waves in the 20th-century pandemics underlines the importance of active real-time viral surveillance on a global scale. Transnational collaborations are crucial for the effective exchange of genomic, clinical, and epidemiologic data that will make possible the development of vaccines and treatment protocols and the identification of the best population-based strategies. Although our ability to produce a vaccine in sufficient quantities to cover people who are exposed in a first pandemic wave is very limited with today's technology, an interwave period would provide time to increase the production of biomedical tools and to vaccinate populations, thereby mitigating the morbidity and mortality associated with successive and potentially more lethal waves. This possibility, too, is a powerful incentive for international collaboration, since all would potentially share the benefits. If an effective vaccine had been available and used even a year after the emergence of the A/H3N2 viruses in 1968, most of the deaths in Europe and Asia could probably have been prevented.

The signature pandemic feature of shifts in age-specific mortality patterns should influence vaccination priorities.5 Given that the supplies of vaccine and antiviral agents are likely to be constrained, the efficient allocation necessary for reducing mortality will require consideration of local demography, expected shifts in age-specific incidence, direct and herd effects of vaccination in various age groups, and ethical issues regarding life expectancies and potential years of life saved in various groups. The indirect effects of reducing transmission also warrant further consideration. The role of preexisting antibodies in the elderly, their reduced immune response because of immune senescence, and greater transmission among children should prompt the targeting of younger age groups as the soundest policy in a 1918-like scenario. However, these attributes do not necessarily apply to other pandemics to the same extent.5

Nonmedical interventions — primarily social distancing — could be useful in staving off transmission. Simulation models suggest that such interventions would considerably decrease the incidence of infection only if the basic reproductive number was less than 2, a rate that is lower than that observed in past pandemics.3

Though the rapidity of transmission of influenza virus during pandemics necessitates immediate action, it can be hoped that close collaborations and lessons drawn from previous pandemics will contribute to reducing national and global mortality. The documented relevant signature features can help health authorities prioritize national strategies and aid international collaborators in addressing the initial and successive waves of illnesses and deaths.

Dr. Miller reports being named on a pending patent held by the National Institutes of Health on a novel influenza vaccine; and Dr. Simonsen, receiving consulting fees from Merck and research support from Wyeth. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

This article (10.1056/NEJMp0903906) was published on May 7, 2009 at NEJM.org.

Source Information

Dr. Miller is the associate director for research, Dr. Viboud a staff scientist, and Dr. Balinska a research associate at the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Dr. Simonsen is an adjunct professor and research director of the Department of Global Health, George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Washington, DC.

References

References

  1. 1

    Simonsen L, Olson DR, Viboud C, et al. Pandemic influenza and mortality: past evidence and projections for the future. In: Knobler SL, Mack A, Mahmoud A, Lemon SM, eds. The threat of pandemic influenza: are we ready? Workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2005:89-114.

  2. 2

    Andreasen V, Viboud C, Simonsen L. Epidemiologic characterization of the 1918 influenza pandemic summer wave in Copenhagen: implications for pandemic control strategies. J Infect Dis 2008;197:270-278
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Viboud C, Tam T, Fleming D, Handel A, Miller MA, Simonsen L. Transmissibility and mortality impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza, with emphasis on the unusually deadly 1951 epidemic. Vaccine 2006;24:6701-6707
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Richard SA, Sugaya N, Simonsen L, Miller MA, Viboud C. A comparative study of the 1918-1920 influenza pandemic in Japan, USA and UK: mortality impact and implications for pandemic planning. Epidemiol Infect 2009 February 12:1-11 (Epub ahead of print).

  5. 5

    Miller MA, Viboud C, Olson DR, Grais RF, Rabaa MA, Simonsen L. Prioritization of influenza pandemic vaccination to minimize years of life lost. J Infect Dis 2008;198:305-311
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (49)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    T. R. Maines, J. A. Belser, K. M. Gustin, N. van Hoeven, H. Zeng, N. Svitek, V. von Messling, J. M. Katz, T. M. Tumpey. (2012) Local Innate Immune Responses and Influenza Virus Transmission and Virulence in Ferrets. Journal of Infectious Diseases 205:3, 474-485
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Shikha Garg, Alicia M. Fry, Monica Patton, Anthony E. Fiore, Lyn Finelli. (2012) Antiviral Treatment of Influenza in Children. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 31:2, e43-e51
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Roberto Gasparini, Daniela Amicizia, Piero Luigi Lai, Donatella Panatto. (2012) Aflunov ® : a prepandemic influenza vaccine. Expert Review of Vaccines 11:2, 145-157
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    A. Camacho, S. Ballesteros, A. L. Graham, F. Carrat, O. Ratmann, B. Cazelles. (2011) Explaining rapid reinfections in multiple-wave influenza outbreaks: Tristan da Cunha 1971 epidemic as a case study. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278:1725, 3635-3643
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Sunmi Lee, Michael Golinski, Gerardo Chowell. (2011) Modeling Optimal Age-Specific Vaccination Strategies Against Pandemic Influenza. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Gilberto González-Parra, Abraham J. Arenas, Diego F. Aranda, Lupe Segovia. (2011) Modeling the epidemic waves of AH1N1/09 influenza around the world. Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology 2:4, 219-226
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    V. Charu, G. Chowell, L. S. Palacio Mejia, S. Echevarria-Zuno, V. H. Borja-Aburto, L. Simonsen, M. A. Miller, C. Viboud. (2011) Mortality Burden of the A/H1N1 Pandemic in Mexico: A Comparison of Deaths and Years of Life Lost to Seasonal Influenza. Clinical Infectious Diseases 53:10, 985-993
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Jaime E. Hernandez, Joanne Grainger, Lone Simonsen, Phil Collis, Laurel Edelman, William P. Sheridan. (2011) Impact of the 2009/2010 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic on trends in influenza hospitalization, diagnostic testing, and treatment. Influenza and Other Respiratory Virusesno-no
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Chris W. Potter, Roy Jennings. (2011) A definition for influenza pandemics based on historial records. Journal of Infection 63:4, 252-259
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Gerardo Chowell, Cécile Viboud, Lone Simonsen, Mark A Miller. (2011) Measuring the benefits of school closure interventions to mitigate influenza. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine 5:5, 597-599
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Anton P.J. Middelberg, Tania Rivera-Hernandez, Nani Wibowo, Linda H.L. Lua, Yuanyuan Fan, Graham Magor, Cindy Chang, Yap P. Chuan, Michael F. Good, Michael R. Batzloff. (2011) A microbial platform for rapid and low-cost virus-like particle and capsomere vaccines. Vaccine 29:41, 7154-7162
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Helena C. Maltezou, Panagiotis Katerelos, Maria Mavrouli, Athanasia Lourida, John G. Routsias, Nicholas Spanakis, Antonios Maragos, Anastasia Tedoma, Yiannis Bassiakos, Georgios Koratzanis, Stephanos Mantagos, Simeon Metallidis, Aspasia Katragkou, Pavlos Nikolaidis, Emmanuel Roilides, Maria Theodoridou, Athanassios Tsakris. (2011) Seroepidemiological study of pandemic influenza H1N1 following the 2009–2010 wave in Greece. Vaccine 29:38, 6664-6669
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Caterina Rizzo, Marco Ajelli, Stefano Merler, Andrea Pugliese, Ilaria Barbetta, Stefania Salmaso, Piero Manfredi. (2011) Epidemiology and transmission dynamics of the 1918–19 pandemic influenza in Florence, Italy. Vaccine 29, B27-B32
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Neslihan Saglanmak, Viggo Andreasen, Lone Simonsen, Kåre Mølbak, Mark A. Miller, Cécile Viboud. (2011) Gradual changes in the age distribution of excess deaths in the years following the 1918 influenza pandemic in Copenhagen: Using epidemiological evidence to detect antigenic drift. Vaccine 29, B42-B48
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Sophie Valtat, Anne Cori, Fabrice Carrat, Alain-Jacques Valleron. (2011) Age distribution of cases and deaths during the 1889 influenza pandemic. Vaccine 29, B6-B10
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    G. Chowell, C. Viboud, L. Simonsen, M.A. Miller, J. Hurtado, G. Soto, R. Vargas, M.A. Guzman, M. Ulloa, C.V. Munayco. (2011) The 1918–1920 influenza pandemic in Peru. Vaccine 29, B21-B26
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Heath Kelly. (2011) The classical definition of a pandemic is not elusive. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 89:7, 540-541
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Wladimir J. Alonso, Francielle C. Nascimento, Rodolfo Acuña-Soto, Cynthia Schuck-Paim, Mark A. Miller. (2011) The 1918 influenza pandemic in Florianopolis: A subtropical city in Brazil. Vaccine 29, B16-B20
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Lone Simonsen, Cécile Viboud, Gerardo Chowell, Viggo Andreasen, Donald R. Olson, Vikash Parekh, Kåre Mølbak, Mark A. Miller. (2011) The need for interdisciplinary studies of historic pandemics. Vaccine 29, B1-B5
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    G. Katriel, R. Yaari, A. Huppert, U. Roll, L. Stone. (2011) Modelling the initial phase of an epidemic using incidence and infection network data: 2009 H1N1 pandemic in Israel as a case study. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 8:59, 856-867
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    T.S. Sunil, Lisa K. Zottarelli. (2011) Student utilization of a university 2009 H1N1 vaccination clinic. Vaccine 29:29-30, 4687-4689
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    D. L. Chao, L. Matrajt, N. E. Basta, J. D. Sugimoto, B. Dean, D. A. Bagwell, B. Oiulfstad, M. E. Halloran, I. M. Longini. (2011) Planning for the Control of Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) in Los Angeles County and the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology 173:10, 1121-1130
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Konrad C. Bradley, Cheryl A. Jones, S. Mark Tompkins, Ralph A. Tripp, Rupert J. Russell, Marie R. Gramer, Jamie Heimburg-Molinaro, David F. Smith, Richard D. Cummings, David A. Steinhauer. (2011) Comparison of the receptor binding properties of contemporary swine isolates and early human pandemic H1N1 isolates (Novel 2009 H1N1). Virology 413:2, 169-182
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    DaiHai He, Jonathan Dushoff, Troy Day, Junling Ma, David J. D. Earn. (2011) Mechanistic modelling of the three waves of the 1918 influenza pandemic. Theoretical Ecology 4:2, 283-288
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Gulam Khandaker, Alexa Dierig, Harunor Rashid, Catherine King, Leon Heron, Robert Booy. (2011) Systematic review of clinical and epidemiological features of the pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 5:3, 148-156
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Dora C. Pearce, Paul K. Pallaghy, James M. McCaw, Jodie McVernon, John D. Mathews. (2011) Understanding mortality in the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic in England and Wales. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 5:2, 89-98
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Maja Folkenberg, Torbjörn Callréus, Henrik Svanström, Palle Valentiner-Branth, Anders Hviid. (2011) Spontaneous reporting of adverse events following immunisation against pandemic influenza in Denmark November 2009–March 2010. Vaccine 29:6, 1180-1184
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    L. Brammer, L. Blanton, S. Epperson, D. Mustaquim, A. Bishop, K. Kniss, R. Dhara, M. Nowell, L. Kamimoto, L. Finelli. (2011) Surveillance for Influenza during the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Pandemic-United States, April 2009-March 2010. Clinical Infectious Diseases 52:Supplement 1, S27-S35
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    M. AJELLI, S. MERLER, A. PUGLIESE, C. RIZZO. (2011) Model predictions and evaluation of possible control strategies for the 2009 A/H1N1v influenza pandemic in Italy. Epidemiology and Infection 139:01, 68-79
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Dany Shoham. (2011) The Modes of Evolutionary Emergence of Primal and Late Pandemic Influenza Virus Strains from Viral Reservoir in Animals: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. Influenza Research and Treatment 2011, 1-27
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Uri Roll, Rami Yaari, Guy Katriel, Oren Barnea, Lewi Stone, Ella Mendelson, Michal Mendelboim, Amit Huppert. (2011) Onset of a pandemic: characterizing the initial phase of the swine flu (H1N1) epidemic in Israel. BMC Infectious Diseases 11:1, 92
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Maytee Cruz-Aponte, Erin C McKiernan, Marco A Herrera-Valdez. (2011) Mitigating effects of vaccination on influenza outbreaks given constraints in stockpile size and daily administration capacity. BMC Infectious Diseases 11:1, 207
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Andrew Tillyard. (2010) Reorganising the pandemic triage processes to ethically maximise individuals’ best interests. Intensive Care Medicine 36:11, 1966-1971
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    A. L. GREER, A. TUITE, D. N. FISMAN. (2010) Age, influenza pandemics and disease dynamics. Epidemiology and Infection 138:11, 1542-1549
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Vaughn S. Millner, Bernard H. Eichold, Ronald D. Franks, G. David Johnson. (2010) Influenza Vaccination Acceptance and Refusal Rates Among Health Care Personnel. Southern Medical Journal 103:10, 993-998
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Arthur L. Kellermann, Alexander P. Isakov, Ruth Parker, Michael T. Handrigan, Seth Foldy. (2010) Web-Based Self-Triage of Influenza-Like Illness During the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Pandemic. Annals of Emergency Medicine 56:3, 288-294.e6
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    N. Cardeñosa, A. Domínguez, J. Carratalà, J. I. Ricarte, J. M. Jansà, J. Arnau, N. Camps, M. Chanovas, A. Mas, A. Trilla. (2010) Usefulness of simulated cases for assessing pandemic influenza preparedness plans. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 16:9, 1364-1367
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Nick Wilson, Philippa Howden-Chapman, Michael G. Baker. (2010) Co-benefits and ‘no regrets’ benefits of influenza pandemic planning. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 4:3, 113-115
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Caterina Rizzo, Maria Cristina Rota, Antonino Bella, Valeria Alfonsi, Silvia Declich, Maria Grazia Caporali, Alessia Ranghiasci, Giulia Lapini, Simona Piccirella, Stefania Salmaso, Emanuele Montomoli. (2010) Cross-reactive antibody responses to the 2009 A/H1N1v influenza virus in the Italian population in the pre-pandemic period. Vaccine 28:20, 3558-3562
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Shibo Jiang, Runming Li, Lanying Du, Shuwen Liu. (2010) Roles of the hemagglutinin of influenza A virus in viral entry and development of antiviral therapeutics and vaccines. Protein & Cell 1:4, 342-354
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Yi Guan, Dhanasekaran Vijaykrishna, Justin Bahl, Huachen Zhu, Jia Wang, Gavin J. D. Smith. (2010) The emergence of pandemic influenza viruses. Protein & Cell 1:1, 9-13
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    D. Rios-Doria, G. Chowell. (2009) Qualitative analysis of the level of cross-protection between epidemic waves of the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic. Journal of Theoretical Biology 261:4, 584-592
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    D. Marcelli, C. Marelli, N. Richards. (2009) Influenza A(H1N1)v pandemic in the dialysis population: first wave results from an international survey. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 24:12, 3566-3572
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    The ANZIC Influenza Investigators. (2009) Critical Care Services and 2009 H1N1 Influenza in Australia and New Zealand. New England Journal of Medicine 361:20, 1925-1934
    Full Text

  45. 45

    Vicente Soriano, Juan González-Lahoz. (2009) El desafío de la nueva gripe A/H1N1. Medicina Clínica 133:18, 708-709
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Chowell, Gerardo, Bertozzi, Stefano M., Colchero, M. Arantxa, Lopez-Gatell, Hugo, Alpuche-Aranda, Celia, Hernandez, Mauricio, Miller, Mark A., . (2009) Severe Respiratory Disease Concurrent with the Circulation of H1N1 Influenza. New England Journal of Medicine 361:7, 674-679
    Full Text

  47. 47

    Heath Kelly, Kristina Grant, Simon Williams, David Smith. (2009) H1N1 swine origin influenza infection in the United States and Europe in 2009 may be similar to H1N1 seasonal influenza infection in two Australian states in 2007 and 2008. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 3:4, 183-188
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Sung-Han Kim. (2009) Treatment of Severe Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 Infection. Infection and Chemotherapy 41:5, 265
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Jina Lee, Hoan Jong Lee. (2009) Novel swine-origin H1N1 influenza. Korean Journal of Pediatrics 52:8, 862
    CrossRef