Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Perspective

Perspective Roundtable

CABG vs. Stenting — Clinical Implications of the SYNTAX Trial

Thomas H. Lee, M.D., L. David Hillis, M.D., and Elizabeth G. Nabel, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2009; 360:e10February 19, 2009

Video

Adobe Flash Player is required to view this feature. Download the latest version here. If you are using an operating system that does not support Flash, we are working hard to bring you alternative formats.

Poll Results

Perspective Roundtable: CABG vs. Stenting — Clinical Implications of the SYNTAX Trial — Poll Comments.

Contributors

Perspective Roundtable: CABG vs. Stenting — Clinical Implications of the SYNTAX Trial — Contributors.

In the international SYNTAX trial, 1800 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to either revascularization with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention involving drug-eluting stents. The need for repeat revascularization was significantly lower with CABG, but the risk of stroke was significantly higher — a tradeoff that must be considered in making clinical decisions regarding patients with advanced coronary disease. In a roundtable discussion moderated by Dr. Thomas Lee, cardiologists David Hillis and Elizabeth Nabel debate the implications of these findings for clinical practice.

View video of this roundtable discussion, participate in the poll, and contribute your comments. Polling and commenting close March 4, 2009.

Citing Articles (4)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Hui-Chun Huang, Hsien-Li Kao, Xue-Ming Wu, Sheoi-Shen Wang, Ron-Bin Hsu, Yi-Lwun Ho, Ming-Fong Chen. (2010) Long-term prognosis in ethnic Chinese patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Clinical Research in Cardiology 99:7, 437-443
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Christoph H. R. Wiese, Utz E. Bartels, York A. Zausig, Jochen Pfirstinger, Bernhard M. Graf, Gerd G. Hanekop. (2009) Prehospital emergency treatment of palliative care patients with cardiac arrest: a retrolective investigation. Supportive Care in Cancer
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    (2009) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting. New England Journal of Medicine 360:25, 2672-2675
    Full Text

  4. 4

    Peter K. Smith. (2009) Treatment selection for coronary artery disease: The collision of a belief system with evidence. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 137:5, 1050-1053
    CrossRef

Letters