Perspective
Health Care 2009
Slowing the Growth of Health Care Costs — Lessons from Regional Variation
N Engl J Med 2009; 360:849-852February 26, 2009
- Article
Interactive Map
Medicare Reimbursement Rates, 2006, and Annual Growth in Reimbursements, 1992–2006.
The expansion of health insurance coverage in the United States is likely to be on the front burner of health care reform efforts in the new presidential administration. But boiling on the back burner is perhaps the most serious threat to Americans' access to care: rapid growth in health care costs.
Pessimism abounds. Most observers see rising costs as an inexorable force, blame advancing technology, and conclude that only by rationing beneficial care or making draconian price cuts can we slow the growth of health care costs.
But a careful look at variations in spending growth and spending patterns among U.S. regions reveals a more optimistic picture. By learning from regions that have attained sustainable growth rates and building on successful models of delivery-system and payment-system reform, we might, with adequate physician leadership, manage to “bend the cost curve.”
The graph
Annual Growth Rates of per Capita Medicare Spending in Five U.S. Hospital-Referral Regions, 1992–2006. shows per capita Medicare spending from 1992 through 2006 in five U.S. hospital-referral regions. During this period, overall Medicare spending, adjusted for general price inflation, rose by 3.5% annually. But there was considerable variation among regions. Per capita inflation-adjusted spending in Miami grew at an annual rate of 5.0%, as compared with just 2.3% in Salem, Oregon, and 2.4% in San Francisco. In dollar terms, the growth in per capita Medicare expenditures between 1992 and 2006 in Miami ($8,085) was nearly equal to the level of 2006 expenditures in San Francisco ($8,331). A total of 26 hospital-referral regions (including Dallas) had more rapid spending growth than Miami, and 18 regions (including San Diego) had slower growth than Salem.Three of the regions included in the graph — Boston, San Francisco, and East Long Island, New York — started out with nearly identical per capita spending, but their expenditures grew at markedly different annual rates: 2.4% in San Francisco, 3.0% in Boston, and 4.0% in East Long Island. Although such differences may appear modest, compounding leads to enormous differences in spending levels over time. By 2006, per capita spending in East Long Island was $2,500 more than in San Francisco — which translates into about $1 billion in additional annual Medicare spending from this region alone.
What's going on? It is highly unlikely that these differences in growth could be explained by differences in health. Marked regional differences in spending remain after careful adjustment for health, and there is no evidence that health is decaying more rapidly in Miami than in Salem.
The variations allow us to rule out two overly simplistic explanations for spending growth. First, “technology” is clearly an insufficient explanation: residents of all U.S. regions have access to the same technology, and it is implausible that physicians in the regions with slower spending growth are consciously denying their patients needed care. Indeed, evidence suggests that the quality of care and health outcomes are better in lower-spending regions and that there have been no greater gains in survival in regions with greater spending growth.1 Second, it is difficult to blame regional differences entirely on the current payment system, since all our evidence on regional growth comes from populations in the fee-for-service system. Other research has emphasized the role of managed care in moderating the growth of costs,2 but this story cannot explain the rapid growth in Miami, where roughly half of Medicare enrollees are covered by Medicare Advantage plans.
The causes must therefore lie in how physicians and others respond to the availability of technology, capital, and other resources in the context of the fee-for-service payment system. A recent study by researchers in our group provides further insight.3 Using clinical vignettes to present standardized patient care scenarios to physicians throughout the country, the researchers found that physicians in high- and low-spending regions were about equally likely to recommend specific clinical interventions when the supporting evidence was strong. Those in higher-spending regions, however, were much more likely than those in lower-spending regions to recommend discretionary services, such as referral to a subspecialist for typical gastroesophageal reflux or stable angina or, in another vignette, hospital admission for an 85-year-old patient with an exacerbation of end-stage congestive heart failure. And they were three times as likely to admit the latter patient directly to an intensive care unit and 30% less likely to discuss palliative care with the patient and family. Differences in the propensity to intervene in such gray areas of decision making were highly correlated with regional differences in per capita spending.
Total Reimbursement Rates for Noncapitated Medicare per Enrollee, 2006, and Annual Growth in Medicare Reimbursements, 1992–2006, for the 25 Largest U.S. Hospital-Referral Regions. What do these findings suggest in terms of approaches to reducing health care costs? First, physicians have an opportunity to lead. Physicians are still almost entirely responsible for determining what treatments their patients receive and where they obtain their care. And although the increasingly commercial behavior of some physicians may threaten the public perception of the profession, patients still largely trust their own doctors. Leadership is needed at three levels. In their practices, physicians can help patients understand when a more conservative path is likely to be as safe as a more intensive and higher-cost path. In their communities, physicians have the credibility to argue against the need for further growth — whether through hospital expansion, the construction of new imaging centers, or the recruitment of more specialists to oversupplied regions (www.dartmouthatlas.org provides spending, hospital, and workforce data for each U.S. hospital-referral region). And physicians can support changes in the health care system that will help their patients and communities get the best possible care at the lowest possible cost.
But physicians will need help from payers and policymakers. Under the current payment system, physicians cannot afford the time it takes to help patients understand why a test or procedure is not needed. Hospitals lose money when they improve care in ways that reduce admissions, and they lose market share when they don't keep pace in the local medical arms race. In this race there are no financial rewards for collaboration, coordination, or conservative practice.
To slow spending growth, we need policies that encourage high-growth (or high-cost) regions to behave more like low-growth, low-cost regions — and that encourage low-cost, slow-growth regions to sustain their current trends. Our ongoing research program (funded in part by the National Institute on Aging) suggests that there are two broad and closely linked strategies for accomplishing these aims: fostering the growth of more organized systems of care and implementing fundamental payment reform. Consensus is emerging that integrated delivery systems that provide strong support to clinicians and team-based care management for patients offer great promise for improving quality and lowering costs. Most physicians already practice within local referral networks around one or more hospitals, which could form local integrated delivery systems with little disruption of practice.4 Policymakers would need to remove legal barriers to collaboration and offer incentives — such as larger payment updates or subsidies for implementing electronic health records — to providers who were willing to establish real or virtual accountable care systems.5 Our volume-based payment systems could then be changed to incorporate partial capitation, bundled payments, or shared savings, thereby fostering accountability for overall costs and quality of care. Although much remains to be learned about aligning reforms in delivery systems with payment reforms, early results from demonstration projects have been promising and could provide the foundation for national reform.
The good news is that small changes in annual per capita growth rates have enormous implications for the long-term solvency of Medicare and the sustainability of expanded insurance coverage. Using data from the 2008 Medicare trustees' report on projected revenues and total Part A and B spending, we estimate that Medicare will be $660 billion in the hole by 2023. Reducing annual growth in per capita spending from 3.5% (the national average) to 2.4% (the rate in San Francisco) would leave Medicare with a healthy estimated balance of $758 billion, a cumulative savings of $1.42 trillion.
Such a change would not solve the country's long-term fiscal challenges. But it suggests that if we focus reform efforts on current areas of overspending — overuse of hospitals and unnecessary visits, consultations, tests, and minor procedures — we may be able to bend the cost curve while continuing to enjoy the benefits of technological advances.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Source Information
Dr. Fisher is a professor of medicine and of community and family medicine, Dr. Bynum an assistant professor of medicine and of community and family medicine, and Dr. Skinner a professor of economics and of community and family medicine at Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH, where Dr. Fisher also directs the Center for Health Policy Research, Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice.
- References
References
1
Skinner JS ,Staiger DO ,Fisher ES . Is technological change in medicine always worth it? The case of acute myocardial infarction. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:w34-w47
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline2
Chernew ME ,Hirth RA ,Sonnad SS ,Ermann R ,Fendrick AM . Managed care, medical technology, and health care cost growth: a review of the evidence. Med Care Res Rev 1998;55:259-288
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline3
Sirovich B ,Gallagher PM ,Wennberg DE ,Fisher ES . Discretionary decision making by primary care physicians and the cost of U.S. health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:813-823
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline4
Bynum JP ,Bernal-Delgado E ,Gottlieb D ,Fisher E . Assigning ambulatory patients and their physicians to hospitals: a method for obtaining population-based provider performance measurements. Health Serv Res 2007;42:45-62
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline5
Shortell SM ,Casalino LP . Health care reform requires accountable care systems. JAMA 2008;300:95-97
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
- Citing Articles (45)
Citing Articles
1
Donohue, Julie M., Morden, Nancy E., Gellad, Walid F., Bynum, Julie P., Zhou, Weiping, Hanlon, Joseph T., Skinner, Jonathan, . (2012) Sources of Regional Variation in Medicare Part D Drug Spending. New England Journal of Medicine 366:6, 530-538
Full Text2
Hannah Wunsch, Hayley Gershengorn, Damon C. Scales. (2012) Economics of ICU Organization and Management. Critical Care Clinics 28:1, 25-37
CrossRef3
Michael Shwartz, Erol A. Peköz, Alan Labonte, Janelle Heineke, Joseph D. Restuccia. (2011) Bringing Responsibility for Small Area Variations in Hospitalization Rates Back to the Hospital. Medical Care 49:12, 1062-1067
CrossRef4
Aine Marie Kelly, Paul Cronin. (2011) Rationing and Health Care Reform: Not a Question of If, but When. Journal of the American College of Radiology 8:12, 830-837
CrossRef5
Joan M. Neuner, Marilyn M. Schapira. (2011) The Importance of Physicians’ Risk Perception in Osteoporosis Treatment Decision Making. Journal of Clinical Densitometry
CrossRef6
Kirby I. Bland, David B. Hoyt, Hiram C. Polk, John E. Niederhuber. (2011) Comparative Effectiveness Research. Annals of Surgery 254:4, 550-557
CrossRef7
DIANE E. MEIER. (2011) Increased Access to Palliative Care and Hospice Services: Opportunities to Improve Value in Health Care. Milbank Quarterly 89:3, 343-380
CrossRef8
Jeremy Hess, Daniel Bednarz, Jaeyong Bae, Jessica Pierce. (2011) Petroleum and Health Care: Evaluating and Managing Health Care's Vulnerability to Petroleum Supply Shifts. American Journal of Public Health 101:9, 1568-1579
CrossRef9
Elizabeth A. Madigan, Nahida Gordon, Richard H. Fortinsky, Siran M. Koroukian, Ileana Piña, Jennifer S. Riggs. (2011) Predictors of functional capacity changes in a US population of Medicare home health care (HHC) patients with heart failure (HF). Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
CrossRef10
Maartje H.J. Swennen, Geert J.M.G. van der Heijden, Geert H. Blijham, Cor J. Kalkman. (2011) Career stage and work setting create different barriers for evidence-based medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17:4, 775-785
CrossRef11
Janet K. Freburger, George M. Holmes, Li-Jung E. Ku, Malcolm P. Cutchin, Kendra Heatwole-Shank, Lloyd J. Edwards. (2011) Disparities in Postacute Rehabilitation Care for Stroke: An Analysis of the State Inpatient Databases. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 92:8, 1220-1229
CrossRef12
Joseph J Doyle. (2011) Returns to Local-Area Health Care Spending: Evidence from Health Shocks to Patients Far From Home. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3:3, 221-243
CrossRef13
Jeffrey I. Farber, Beartriz Korc-Grodzicki, Qingling Du, Rosanne M. Leipzig, Albert L. Siu. (2011) Operational and quality outcomes of a mobile acute care for the elderly service. Journal of Hospital Medicine 6:6, 358-363
CrossRef14
Gabriel A. Smith, Phillip Dagostino, Mitchell G. Maltenfort, Aaron S. Dumont, John K. Ratliff. (2011) Geographic variation and regional trends in adoption of endovascular techniques for cerebral aneurysms. Journal of Neurosurgery 114:6, 1768-1777
CrossRef15
Stephen G. Hall, P. A. V. B. Swamy, George S. Tavlas. (2011) Generalized cointegration: a new concept with an application to health expenditure and health outcomes. Empirical Economics
CrossRef16
Badi H. Baltagi, Francesco Moscone, Elisa Tosetti. (2011) Medical technology and the production of health care. Empirical Economics
CrossRef17
S. Samuel Bederman, Peter C. Coyte, Hans J. Kreder, Nizar N. Mahomed, Warren J. McIsaac, James G. Wright. (2011) Whoʼs in the Driverʼs Seat? The Influence of Patient and Physician Enthusiasm on Regional Variation in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Surgery. Spine 36:6, 481-489
CrossRef18
Smith, Stephen R., . (2011) A Recipe for Medical Schools to Produce Primary Care Physicians. New England Journal of Medicine 364:6, 496-497
Full Text19
Robert M. Kaplan. (2011) Variation between End-of-Life Health Care Costs in Los Angeles and San Diego: Why Are They So Different?. Journal of Palliative Medicine 14:2, 215-220
CrossRef20
J. Scott Millikan. (2011) Bigger. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 141:2, 311-317
CrossRef21
Elaine H. Morrato, Benjamin G. Druss, Daniel M. Hartung, Robert J. Valuck, Deborah Thomas, Richard Allen, Elizabeth Campagna, John W. Newcomer. (2011) Small area variation and geographic and patient-specific determinants of metabolic testing in antipsychotic users. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 20:1, 66-75
CrossRef22
Stephen J. Bartels. 2010. The US System of Geriatric Mental Health Care: Financing and Future Challenges. , 770-776.
CrossRef23
Abe Dunn. (2010) The value of coverage in the medicare advantage insurance market. Journal of Health Economics 29:6, 839-855
CrossRef24
Jeffrey H. Silber, Robert Kaestner, Orit Even-Shoshan, Yanli Wang, Laura J. Bressler. (2010) Aggressive Treatment Style and Surgical Outcomes. Health Services Research 45:6p2, 1872-1892
CrossRef25
Benjamin W. Friedman, Mikaela Chilstrom, Polly E. Bijur, E. John Gallagher. (2010) Diagnostic Testing and Treatment of Low Back Pain in United States Emergency Departments. Spine 35:24, E1406-E1411
CrossRef26
Michael D Brennan. (2010) Professionalism. International Journal of Dermatology 49:10, 1210-1212
CrossRef27
R Scott Braithwaite. (2010) US health reform and value: hit or miss?. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 10:5, 477-480
CrossRef28
Gang Fang, John M. Brooks, Elizabeth A. Chrischilles. (2010) A New Method to Isolate Local-Area Practice Styles in Prescription Use as the Basis for Instrumental Variables in Comparative Effectiveness Research. Medical Care 48:8, 710-717
CrossRef29
James M. Cummings. (2010) Editorial Comment. Urology 76:2, 396
CrossRef30
Amy S. Kelley, R. Sean Morrison, Neil S. Wenger, Susan L. Ettner, Catherine A. Sarkisian. (2010) Determinants of Treatment Intensity for Patients with Serious Illness: A New Conceptual Framework. Journal of Palliative Medicine 13:7, 807-813
CrossRef31
Chris Tonner, Laura Trupin, Jinoos Yazdany, Lindsey Criswell, Patricia Katz, Edward Yelin. (2010) Role of community and individual characteristics in physician visits for persons with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care & Research 62:6, 888-895
CrossRef32
Arthur Garson, Carolyn L. Engelhard, John C. Lewin. (2010) Our Physicians and Our Profession Must Lead in Improving Our Health Care System. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 55:20, 2196-2200
CrossRef33
Bobby Milstein, Jack Homer, Gary Hirsch. (2010) Analyzing National Health Reform Strategies With a Dynamic Simulation Model. American Journal of Public Health 100:5, 811-819
CrossRef34
Jonathan H. Sunshine, Danny R. Hughes, Cristian Meghea, Mythreyi Bhargavan. (2010) What Factors Affect the Productivity and Efficiency of Physician Practices?. Medical Care 48:2, 110-117
CrossRef35
(2010) When inexpensive tests have expensive outcomes: faecal occult blood tests as an example. Internal Medicine Journal 40:2, 91-93
CrossRef36
Brody, Howard, . (2010) Medicine's Ethical Responsibility for Health Care Reform — The Top Five List. New England Journal of Medicine 362:4, 283-285
Full Text37
Richard C. Wender, Marc Altshuler. (2009) Can the Medical Home Reduce Cancer Morbidity and Mortality?. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice 36:4, 845-858
CrossRef38
G A Little. (2009) Variation, perinatal regionalization and total cohort accountability. Journal of Perinatology 29:12, 777-778
CrossRef39
L R Blackmon, W D Barfield, A R Stark. (2009) Hospital neonatal services in the United States: variation in definitions, criteria, and regulatory status, 2008. Journal of Perinatology 29:12, 788-794
CrossRef40
G. Patrick Clagett. (2009) Does vascular surgery cost too much?. Journal of Vascular Surgery 50:5, 1211-1218
CrossRef41
Sutherland, Jason M., Fisher, Elliott S., Skinner, Jonathan S., . (2009) Getting Past Denial — The High Cost of Health Care in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 361:13, 1227-1230
Full Text42
Steven A. Levenson. (2009) The Basis for Improving and Reforming Long-Term Care, Part 1: The Foundation. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 10:7, 459-465
CrossRef43
Luft, Harold S., . (2009) Health Care Reform — Toward More Freedom, and Responsibility, for Physicians. New England Journal of Medicine 361:6, 623-628
Full Text44
Iglehart, John K.. (2009) More Checks Than Balances in the Struggle for Health Care Reform. New England Journal of Medicine 361:5,
Full Text45
Diane E. Meier, Larry Beresford. (2009) Palliative Care Seeks its Home in National Health Care Reform. Journal of Palliative Medicine 12:7, 593-597
CrossRef
