Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Perspective

Focus on Research

Rheumatic Heart Disease in Developing Countries

Jonathan R. Carapetis, Ph.D., F.R.A.C.P.

N Engl J Med 2007; 357:439-441August 2, 2007

Article

Only 30 or 40 years ago, rheumatic fever was a common topic in the Journal. A PubMed search for articles on rheumatic fever published between 1967 and 1976 returned 55 New England Journal of Medicine articles — fewer than for endocarditis (77) but more than for stroke and syphilis (24 entries each). A similar PubMed search for the decade 1997 through 2006 yielded just eight entries for rheumatic fever. This trend holds for all Medline-indexed journals: an average of 516 articles on rheumatic fever per year from 1967 through 1976, but only 172 per year from 1997 through 2006. Most observers would probably consider this decrease to be a reasonable reflection of the waning incidence of the disease. After all, in the mid-20th century, children with rheumatic fever occupied many of the beds in pediatric wards in industrialized countries — indeed, entire hospitals were dedicated to the treatment of, and rehabilitation from, rheumatic fever. But in the latter half of the 20th century, rheumatic fever receded as an important health problem in almost all wealthy countries. Today, most physicians in these countries are unlikely ever to see a case of acute rheumatic fever, and their experience with rheumatic heart disease will be limited to heart-valve lesions in older patients who had rheumatic fever in their youth.

The reality, however, is that the decrease in publications reflects only the waning burden of disease among the less than 20% of the world's population living in high-income countries. For everyone else, rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease are bigger problems than ever. It was estimated recently that worldwide 15.6 million people have rheumatic heart disease and that there are 470,000 new cases of rheumatic fever and 233,000 deaths attributable to rheumatic fever or rheumatic heart disease each year.1 These are conservative estimates — the actual figures are likely to be substantially higher. Almost all these cases and deaths occur in developing countries.

How did rheumatic fever become rare in wealthy countries? Medical science can take some of the credit, thanks largely to the use of penicillin for primary prevention, but most of the reduction is attributable to improved living conditions, which have resulted in less overcrowding and better hygiene, with consequent reductions in transmission of group A streptococci. In other words, rheumatic fever is a disease of poverty. That it is in many ways the epitome of diseases of poverty and social injustice is exemplified by the situations in Australia and New Zealand. In these countries, which boast living standards that are among the best in the world, there are indigenous populations, many of whose members live in poverty, with documented rates of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease that are among the highest in the world.1 Among aboriginal people of northern Australia, for example, acute rheumatic fever develops in 0.2 to 0.5% of school-age children each year, and more than 2% of people of all ages have rheumatic heart disease.

An unfortunate consequence of the decline in rheumatic fever in industrialized countries has been a parallel reduction in related research. Indeed, although our understanding of the pathogenesis of this mysterious disease has improved somewhat, the only advances that have substantially altered the management or prevention of rheumatic fever during the past 40 or 50 years have occurred in the medical and surgical treatment of severe rheumatic heart disease — treatment that is largely palliative and neither accessible nor affordable to the majority of affected patients. The mainstays of the control of rheumatic fever remain treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngitis with penicillin (primary prophylaxis) and administration of penicillin G benzathine injections every 3 to 4 weeks for many years in people with a history of rheumatic fever to prevent recurrent episodes (secondary prophylaxis). Both strategies are based on findings from seminal studies in the United States published in the 1950s.2,3

The available and potential control measures for rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease are summarized in the diagramPotential Preventive Measures for Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease.. Of these, only one — secondary prophylaxis — has been proved to be cost-effective and practical even in the poorest countries. For more than 20 years, the World Health Organization has recommended secondary prophylaxis, most effectively delivered within a coordinated program using a registry of patients, as the first priority for the control of rheumatic heart disease.4 Yet most developing countries still do not have effective secondary-prophylaxis programs.

How to ensure that secondary prophylaxis is delivered to those who need it is one of several critical questions related to the implementation of current knowledge about the control of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Other relevant questions include how to identify people with mild rheumatic heart disease so that they may be offered secondary prophylaxis earlier, whether primary prophylaxis can be a practical and cost-effective public health measure in developing countries, and how to ensure that limited health care funds are spent most effectively — which may entail shifting some funding from the provision of expensive cardiac surgery for severe rheumatic heart disease to the development of robust secondary-prophylaxis programs.

Other key issues revolve around the need to develop new approaches to primary prevention, particularly a vaccine that protects against rheumatic fever. A number of vaccines are in development, and a safe and effective vaccine may well be available within one or two decades. However, experience with other relatively recent vaccines, including conjugate pneumococcal and Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccines, suggests that there may be many barriers to the funding, acceptance, and use of new vaccines in the places that need them most. Potential alternative strategies, including controlling streptococcal skin infections, are intriguing but of unproven benefit.5

How will these issues be addressed? Although some basic research on pathogenesis and the development of early-stage vaccine candidates can take place in laboratories anywhere in the world, the clinical, epidemiologic, and public health studies require access to populations with high rates of disease. In recent years, many such studies have been conducted in Australia, New Zealand, and the Rocky Mountain region of the United States. But applied research of relevance to developing countries should take place in developing countries — a proposition that presents many obvious challenges. Even if barriers caused by poor education, the absence of a skilled workforce, limited finances, inadequate technology, and remoteness of the populations that are at the highest risk of disease can be overcome, the burden of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease is often either unappreciated or dwarfed by epidemics of human immunodeficiency virus, malaria, tuberculosis, and pneumonia.

Marijon and colleagues are to be applauded for the results of the study reported in this issue of the Journal (pages 470–476). The study represents a partnership among researchers in Mozambique, Cambodia, France, and Australia. It tackles an important practical issue: whether and how to conduct screening for rheumatic heart disease among school-age children in developing countries. Also, it presents a compelling argument for the use of echocardiographic screening (see imageStill Image from a Two-Dimensional Echocardiogram in a Patient with Moderate Mitral Regurgitation Due to Rheumatic Heart Disease.). The counterargument is that the use of such expensive technology is neither feasible nor affordable in the countries with the highest disease burden. Yet if clinical diagnosis had been relied on, approximately 90% of echocardiographically detected cases would have been missed. It is not acceptable to leave these cases undiagnosed and these children at risk for recurrence of rheumatic fever simply because echocardiographic screening is seen as an inappropriate use of modern technology in developing countries. Instead, further research is needed to define models of echocardiographic screening that are practical, affordable, and widely applicable.

Marijon et al. found that 2 to 3% of school-age children in Cambodia and Mozambique have rheumatic heart disease, almost all of it previously undiagnosed. We know that this represents the tip of the iceberg: cases in children 5 to 14 years of age are likely to represent only 15 to 20% of all cases in the population.1 These data confirm that rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease are of sufficient importance to warrant the urgent attention of the international public health and research communities.

Source Information

Dr. Carapetis is the director of the Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.

References

References

  1. 1

    Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 2005;5:685-694
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Stollerman GH, Rusoff JH, Hirschfeld I. Prophylaxis against group A streptococci in rheumatic fever: the use of single monthly injections of benzathine penicillin G. N Engl J Med 1955;252:787-792
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Denny F, Wannamaker LW, Brink WR, Rammelkamp CH Jr, Custer EA. Prevention of rheumatic fever: treatment of preceding streptococcic infection. JAMA 1950;143:151-153
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease: report of a WHO expert consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2004;923:1-122
    Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    McDonald M, Currie BJ, Carapetis JR. Acute rheumatic fever: a chink in the chain that links the heart to the throat? Lancet Infect Dis 2004;4:240-245
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (29)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    P. W. Riem Vis, J-W. Rijswijk, S. A. J. Chamuleau, A. Vink, L. A. Herwerden, J. Kluin. (2011) The pathophysiological basis of pharmacological interventions in CAVD. Netherlands Heart Journal
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    A. Grimaldi, I. Olivotto, F. Figini, F. Pappalardo, E. Capritti, E. Ammirati, F. Maisano, S. Benussi, A. Fumero, A. Castiglioni, M. De Bonis, A. C. Vermi, A. Colombo, A. Zangrillo, O. Alfieri. (2011) Dynamic assessment of 'valvular reserve capacity' in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. European Journal of Echocardiography
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Joelle Dobson, Andrew C. Steer, Samantha Colquhoun, Joseph Kado. (2011) Environmental Factors and Rheumatic Heart Disease in Fiji. Pediatric Cardiology
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Tovuudorj Bolormaa, Chimedregzen Tsogtochir. (2011) Diagnosis of rheumatic carditis in Mongolian children. Critical Ultrasound Journal 3:2, 63-66
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Ben M Reeves, Joseph Kado, Monica Brook. (2011) High prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in Fiji detected by echocardiography screening. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 47:7, 473-478
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Norberto A. Guzman, Terry M. Phillips. (2011) Immunoaffinity capillary electrophoresis: A new versatile tool for determining protein biomarkers in inflammatory processes. ELECTROPHORESISn/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Kathleen G. Walker, Margaret Cooper, Karin McCabe, Jane Hughes, Wendy Mathiassen, John Lawrenson, Jo M. Wilmshurst. (2011) Markers of susceptibility to acute rheumatic fever: the B-cell antigen D8/17 is not robust as a marker in South Africa. Cardiology in the Young 21:03, 328-333
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    S. Yacoub, S. Kotit, M. H. Yacoub. (2011) Disease appearance and evolution against a background of climate change and reduced resources. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369:1942, 1719-1729
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Robert O. Bonow. (2011) Valvular heart disease: Patient needs and practice guidelines. Aswan Heart Centre Science & Practice Series 2011:1, 5
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Marjan Mujib, Ravi V. Desai, Mustafa I. Ahmed, Jason L. Guichard, Margaret A. Feller, O. James Ekundayo, Prakash Deedwania, Mahboob Ali, Inmaculada B. Aban, Thomas E. Love, Michel White, Wilbert S. Aronow, Shahbudin H. Rahimtoola, Robert O. Bonow, Ali Ahmed. (2011) Rheumatic heart disease and risk of incident heart failure among community-dwelling older adults: A prospective cohort study. Annals of Medicine1-9
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Yueh-Hsia Luo, Woei-Jer Chuang, Jiunn-Jong Wu, Ming T Lin, Ching-Chuan Liu, Pao-Yen Lin, Jun-Neng Roan, Tak-Wah Wong, Yuh-Ling Chen, Yee-Shin Lin. (2010) Molecular mimicry between streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B and endothelial cells. Laboratory Investigation 90:10, 1492-1506
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Pierre Robert Smeesters, Pierre-Alexandre Drèze, David Perez-Morga, Dominique Biarent, Laurence Van Melderen, Anne Vergison. (2010) Group A Streptococcus virulence and host factors in two toddlers with rheumatic fever following toxic shock syndrome. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 14:5, e403-e409
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    K. Sliwa, M. Carrington, B. M. Mayosi, E. Zigiriadis, R. Mvungi, S. Stewart. (2010) Incidence and characteristics of newly diagnosed rheumatic heart disease in Urban African adults: insights from the Heart of Soweto Study. European Heart Journal 31:6, 719-727
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Philip A. Wescombe, Nicholas C. K. Heng, Jeremy P. Burton, John R. Tagg. (2010) Something Old and Something New: An Update on the Amazing Repertoire of Bacteriocins Produced by Streptococcus salivarius. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins 2:1, 37-45
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Cleonice C. Coelho Mota, Vera Demarchi Aiello, Robert H. Anderson. 2010. Chronic Rheumatic Heart Disease. , 1115-1134.
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Samantha M Colquhoun, Jonathan R Carapetis, Joseph H Kado, Andrew C Steer. (2009) Rheumatic heart disease and its control in the Pacific. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 7:12, 1517-1524
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Andrew C. Steer, Jonathan R. Carapetis. (2009) Acute Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease in Indigenous Populations. Pediatric Clinics of North America 56:6, 1401-1419
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Pierre R Smeesters, David J McMillan, Kadaba S Sriprakash, Melina M Georgousakis. (2009) Differences among group A streptococcus epidemiological landscapes: consequences for M protein-based vaccines?. Expert Review of Vaccines 8:12, 1705-1720
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Tom Parks, Joseph Kado, Samantha Colquhoun, Jonathan Carapetis, Andrew Steer. (2009) Underdiagnosis of acute rheumatic fever in primary care settings in a developing country. Tropical Medicine & International Health 14:11, 1407-1413
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Andrew C Steer, Irwin Law, Laisiana Matatolu, Bernard W Beall, Jonathan R Carapetis. (2009) Global emm type distribution of group A streptococci: systematic review and implications for vaccine development. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 9:10, 611-616
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Andrew C. Steer, Jonathan R. Carapetis. (2009) Prevention and treatment of rheumatic heart disease in the developing world. Nature Reviews Cardiology 6:11, 689-698
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Nazgul A. OMURZAKOVA, Yoshihisa YAMANO, Guli M. SAATOVA, Mavliuda I. MIRZAKHANOVA, Surayo M. SHUKUROVA, Ryskul B. KYDYRALIEVA, Aynagul S. JUMAGULOVA, Askar Sh. SEISENBAEV, Kusuki NISHIOKA, Toshihiro NAKAJIMA. (2009) High incidence of rheumatic fever and Rheumatic heart disease in the republics of Central Asia. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 12:2, 79-83
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    A. Adebajo, P. McGill, M. Tikly. (2009) Tropical rheumatology--a global issue. Rheumatology 48:6, 599-601
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Martin O'Donnell, Salim Yusuf. (2009) Tackling the global burden of stroke: the need for large-scale international studies. The Lancet Neurology 8:4, 306-307
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Tsung O. Cheng. (2009) How much of the recent decline in rheumatic heart disease in China can be explained by changes in cardiovascular risk factors?. International Journal of Cardiology 132:3, 300-302
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Randall J. Olsen, Samuel A. Shelburne, James M. Musser. (2009) Molecular mechanisms underlying group A streptococcal pathogenesis. Cellular Microbiology 11:1, 1-12
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Nigel Wilson. (2008) Echocardiography and subclinical carditis: guidelines that increase sensitivity for acute rheumatic fever. Cardiology in the Young 18:06, 565
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Kameswari Maganti, Vera H. Rigolin, Robert O. Bonow. (2008) Valvular heart disease in women. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports 2:3, 217-226
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    (2007) Rheumatic Heart Disease in Developing Countries. New England Journal of Medicine 357:20, 2089-2089
    Full Text

Letters