Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Perspective

The Price of Sight — Ranibizumab, Bevacizumab, and the Treatment of Macular Degeneration

Robert Steinbrook, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1409-1412October 5, 2006

Article

Audio Interview

Interview with Frederick L. Ferris III on ranibizumab (Lucentis) and bevacizumab (Avastin) for age-related macular degeneration.

Interview with Frederick L. Ferris III on ranibizumab (Lucentis) and bevacizumab (Avastin) for age-related macular degeneration. (6:33)

On June 30, 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ranibizumab — which is manufactured by Genentech and marketed as Lucentis — for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ranibizumab is a fragment of a recombinant monoclonal antibody (see Figure 1Figure 1Relationship between Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab.) that binds to and inhibits all the biologically active forms of vascular endothelial growth factor A. Administered by injection into the vitreous cavity (see Figure 2Figure 2Intravitreal Injection for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.), ranibizumab prevents vision loss and improves visual acuity, with few serious adverse effects (as indicated in the reports by Rosenfeld et al. and Brown et al. in this issue of the Journal, pages 1419–1431 and 1432–1444); it thus represents a substantial advance against a leading cause of blindness (discussed by de Jong in this issue of the Journal, pages 1474–1485). According to the prescribing information, it is recommended that ranibizumab be injected monthly, with treatment likely to be required indefinitely, although less frequent administration is being evaluated. Ranibizumab is also expensive. The wholesale acquisition cost of a vial containing a single dose of 0.5 mg (0.05 ml) is $1,950.

In the United States, about 155,000 cases of age-related macular degeneration are diagnosed each year; typical patients are 65 years of age or older. Although the neovascular form of macular degeneration accounts for about 10% of cases, it is responsible for the vast majority of the associated vision loss. Before the FDA approved ranibizumab, some ophthalmologists began using another monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab, that is closely related to ranibizumab to treat patients who have neovascular macular degeneration or other chorioretinal diseases mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor. Marketed as Avastin and also manufactured by Genentech, bevacizumab is a full-length antibody that is derived from the same mouse monoclonal antibody precursor as ranibizumab (see Figure 1), neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor, and costs considerably less than ranibizumab when administered as an intraocular injection.1,2

In February 2004, the FDA approved bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic cancer of the colon or rectum. Although the typical price of bevacizumab as part of a chemotherapy regimen is $4,400 a month, a 4-ml vial containing 100 mg has a wholesale acquisition cost of $550. Thus, physicians and compounding pharmacies can prepare small aliquots in syringes for intraocular injection at a cost to the physician of $17 to $50, depending on the dose and the efficiency of the process.2 In some instances, charges to patients may be considerably higher. On a molar basis, the typical dose — 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) — of bevacizumab is similar to the approved dose of ranibizumab.

Intraocular administration of bevacizumab is entirely off-label; the drug is formulated for intravenous infusion, not intravitreal injection. Nonetheless, and though data from controlled trials are lacking, bevacizumab appears to be safe and effective in the short term.1,3 And ophthalmologists frequently use medications off-label.

As of mid-September 2006, ranibizumab had been approved in the United States and Switzerland (where it is marketed by Novartis, which has commercialization rights outside the United States). Bevacizumab has already brought Genentech billons of dollars in sales; ranibizumab will soon do so as well.

The good news for patients is that there are two new medications for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, both of which appear to work better than the alternatives. But since they have never been directly compared, physicians can only speculate about which drug is superior with regard to safety, efficacy, and frequency of administration. The price difference is also too big to ignore.

Philip Rosenfeld of the University of Miami School of Medicine has studied both drugs and has pioneered the use of bevacizumab in the eye. (Rosenfeld has also has received consulting fees and grant support from Genentech and consulting fees, lecture fees, and grant support from other companies.) After bevacizumab became available, Rosenfeld and his colleagues administered it intravenously to 18 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Their preliminary findings suggested benefits that were similar to the initial findings with intravitreal ranibizumab. Improvement occurred in both eyes of patients with bilateral disease and lasted 6 months or longer in 12 of the patients.4 However, the treatment cost an average of $2,200 per infusion, and the investigators and other retinal specialists were concerned about the potential for life-threatening adverse reactions, such as heart attack and stroke, which had previously been identified in patients with cancer.2

In an interview, Rosenfeld said that in May 2005 he was driving home and thinking about how bevacizumab could be delivered more safely into the eye. “The `eureka moment' was when I suddenly realized that an appropriate molar amount of Avastin could be injected into the eye, using the same low volume as Lucentis but at a small fraction of the cost.” The next day he spoke to a pharmacy director at the University of Miami about preparing the injections.

In July 2005, Rosenfeld's group published two case reports showing benefit.1 The first patient had neovascular age-related macular degeneration and was losing vision in her one good eye despite having received all the therapies that were approved at the time. The second patient had central retinal vein occlusion and had exhausted other treatment options, according to Rosenfeld. Within 6 months, the intraocular use of bevacizumab had spread around the world. The Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company of San Francisco, which is affiliated with the American Academy of Ophthalmology, even provides risk-management recommendations for such use and an informed-consent form that physicians can modify to fit their practice.5 Most regional Medicare carriers cover intravitreal injections of bevacizumab, although there is no national policy.

In many parts of the world, a medication that costs $1,950 for a monthly injection is unaffordable. In the United States, under Medicare, ranibizumab is covered through Part B; patients are responsible for a 20% copayment for each injection. In some instances, supplemental insurance, Medicaid, or support programs for the poor or uninsured that are funded by the manufacturer or others cover most or all of the patients' costs. But regardless of who pays the bill, sales of ranibizumab generate revenue for Genentech, the drug's high price contributes to the overall cost of health care, and the drug may sometimes still be unaffordable.

It is possible that bevacizumab would prove to be superior for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. For example, the molecule is about three times as large as ranibizumab and may remain in the eye longer, decreasing the frequency with which injections are required. At present, intraocular pharmacokinetic data are lacking. However, ranibizumab could also prove to be better. In addition to its smaller size, ranibizumab is genetically engineered to have greater affinity for vascular endothelial growth factor and is formulated for intraocular use; more of the drug may therefore penetrate all the layers of the retina. Moreover, ranibizumab that leaks out of the eye into the circulation has a half-life of hours; the half-life of a full-length antibody such as bevacizumab is longer. For this reason, ranibizumab could theoretically be associated with less systemic toxicity than bevacizumab, but it is not known whether this is in fact the case. As an antibody fragment, ranibizumab lacks an Fc portion, so it may be less likely to induce inflammation within the eye. However, according to Rosenfeld, no apparent inflammation has been seen with bevacizumab, even with the highest dose that has been administered.3

Genentech specifically developed ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. In an interview, Hal Barron, a senior vice-president and chief medical officer of Genentech, explained the company's position on the use of intraocular bevacizumab. “We have a huge database suggesting that Lucentis is very effective and very safe, so we are just not sure of the value of taking something that is not formulated for the eye and subjecting patients to a randomized trial when there is, in our opinion, a very low likelihood of its being superior,” he said. Nevertheless, Barron acknowledged, “If people have a hypothesis that it would be better or safer, one could certainly test that.”

Since late 2005, the National Eye Institute has been considering a proposal for a prospective multicenter trial that would compare ranibizumab directly with bevacizumab. Although the institute has signed off on the need for a trial, as of mid-September it was still considering the research design and how to pay for the study, which would probably cost tens of millions of dollars. If the study is to go forward, the federal government will probably have to buy both drugs from Genentech. And the investigators will probably have to submit to the FDA an investigational new drug application for intravitreal bevacizumab. Such a comparison might not ultimately affect the difference in price between the drugs, but it is certainly the only way to determine which drug is better for patients.

An interview with Dr. Frederick L. Ferris III, clinical director of the National Eye Institute, can be heard at www.nejm.org.

Source Information

Dr. Steinbrook () is a national correspondent for the Journal.

References

References

  1. 1

    Rosenfeld PJ. Intravitreal Avastin: the low cost alternative to Lucentis? Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:141-143
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Idem. Avastin in ophthalmology: a global phenomenon. Current Insights. Vol. 1. No. 2. Spring 2006. (San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology.)

  3. 3

    Bashshur ZF, Bazarbachi A, Schakal A, Haddad ZA, El Haibi CP, Noureddin BN. Intravitreal bevacizumab for the management of choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:1-9
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Moshfeghi AA, Rosenfeld PJ, Puliafito CA, et al. Systemic bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for neo-vascular age-related macular degeneration: twenty-four-week results of an uncontrolled open-label study. Ophthalmology (in press).

  5. 5

    Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company. Risk management recommendations for off-label, intravitreal use of Avastin. August 2, 2006. (Accessed September 19, 2006, at http://www.omic.com/resources/risk_man/forms/consent/Avastin%20080206.rtf.)

Citing Articles (55)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Matthew Ohr, Peter K Kaiser. (2012) Intravitreal aflibercept injection for neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy1-7
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Ilias Zampros, Anna Praidou, Periklis Brazitikos, Panagiotis Ekonomidis, Sofia Androudi. (2012) Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Journal of Ophthalmology 2012, 1-12
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Humphrey H. P. Yiu, Mark A. Keane. (2012) Enzyme-magnetic nanoparticle hybrids: new effective catalysts for the production of high value chemicals. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnologyn/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Janet Davis, Timothy W. Olsen, Michael Stewart, Paul Sternberg. (2011) How the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trial Results Will Impact Clinical Care. American Journal of Ophthalmology 152:4, 509-514
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Yousef Yafai, Xiu Mei Yang, Marc Niemeyer, Akiko Nishiwaki, Johannes Lange, Peter Wiedemann, Andrew G. King, Tsutomu Yasukawa, Wolfram Eichler. (2011) Anti-angiogenic effects of the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, pazopanib, on choroidal neovascularization in rats. European Journal of Pharmacology 666:1-3, 12-18
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Carolyn K. Pan, Chandrasekar Durairaj, Uday B. Kompella, Ogechi Agwu, Scott C.N. Oliver, Hugo Quiroz-Mercado, Naresh Mandava, Jeffrey L. Olson. (2011) Comparison of Long-Acting Bevacizumab Formulations in the Treatment of Choroidal Neovascularization in a Rat Model. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 27:3, 219-224
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Rosenfeld, Philip J., . (2011) Bevacizumab versus Ranibizumab for AMD. New England Journal of Medicine 364:20, 1966-1967
    Full Text

  8. 8

    Cristina Calvo-Gonzalez, Juan Reche-Frutos, Juan Donate, Cristina Fernandez-Perez, Julian Garcia-Feijoo. (2011) Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Factors Predictive of Visual Outcome and Need for Retreatment. American Journal of Ophthalmology 151:3, 529-534
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Paul Mitchell, Lieven Annemans, Richard White, Meghan Gallagher, Simu Thomas. (2011) Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration. PharmacoEconomics 29:2, 107-131
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Kisaburo Yamada, Kenichi Kimoto, Hirofumi Kono, Toshiaki Kubota. (2011) Switching from Intravitreal Ranibizumab to Bevacizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration. ISRN Ophthalmology 2011, 1-4
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    M L Subramanian, G Abedi, S Ness, E Ahmed, M Fenberg, M K Daly, A Houranieh, E B Feinberg. (2010) Bevacizumab vs ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration: 1-year outcomes of a prospective, double-masked randomised clinical trial. Eye 24:11, 1708-1715
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Barkur S. Shastry. (2010) Genetic diversity and medicinal drug response in eye care. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 248:8, 1057-1061
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Nathan Lassota, Jan Ulrik Prause, Erik Scherfig, Jens Folke Kiilgaard, Morten La Cour. (2010) Clinical and histological findings after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin®) in a porcine model of choroidal neovascularization. Acta Ophthalmologica 88:3, 300-308
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Christine Schmucker, Christoph Ehlken, Lutz L Hansen, Gerd Antes, Hansjuergen T Agostini, Monika Lelgemann. (2010) Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) vs. ranibizumab (Lucentis) for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 21:3, 218-226
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    M. Chowdhury, J. Ghosh, M. Slevin, J.V. Smyth, M.Y. Alexander, F. Serracino-Inglott. (2010) A Comparative Study of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Microvessel Density and Angiogenic Growth Factor Expression in Symptomatic Versus Asymptomatic Patients. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 39:4, 388-395
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Yihai Cao. (2010) Adipose tissue angiogenesis as a therapeutic target for obesity and metabolic diseases. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 9:2, 107-115
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    R. Cao, Y. Xue, E.-M. Hedlund, Z. Zhong, K. Tritsaris, B. Tondelli, F. Lucchini, Z. Zhu, S. Dissing, Y. Cao. (2010) VEGFR1-mediated pericyte ablation links VEGF and PlGF to cancer-associated retinopathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:2, 856-861
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Leilei Zhang, Jeff S. Xu, Virginia M. Sanders, Alan D. Letson, Cynthia J. Roberts, Ronald X. Xu. (2010) Multifunctional microbubbles for image-guided antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Journal of Biomedical Optics 15:3, 030515
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Manju L. Subramanian, Steven Ness, Gelareh Abedi, Ednan Ahmed, Mary Daly, Edward Feinberg, Sumit Bhatia, Payal Patel, Maileah Nguyen, Antoun Houranieh. (2009) Bevacizumab vs Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Early Results of a Prospective Double-Masked, Randomized Clinical Trial. American Journal of Ophthalmology 148:6, 875-882.e1
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Christine Schmucker, Gerd Antes, Monika Lelgemann. (2009) Position Paper: The Need for Head-to-Head Studies Comparing Avastin versus Lucentis. Survey of Ophthalmology 54:6, 705-707
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Alexa Klettner, Johann Roider. (2009) Constitutive and oxidative-stress-induced expression of VEGF in the RPE are differently regulated by different Mitogen-activated protein kinases. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 247:11, 1487-1492
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Gustavo Helguera, Tracy R. Daniels, José A. Rodríguez, Manuel L. Penichet. 2009. Monoclonal Antibodies, Human, Engineered. .
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    E.-M. Hedlund, K. Hosaka, Z. Zhong, R. Cao, Y. Cao. (2009) Malignant cell-derived PlGF promotes normalization and remodeling of the tumor vasculature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:41, 17505-17510
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Jaime Levy, Marina Shneck, Shirley Rosen, Itamar Klemperer, David Rand, Orly Weinstein, Anry Pitchkhadze, Nadav Belfair, Tova Lifshitz. (2009) Intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) for subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. International Ophthalmology 29:5, 349-357
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    JONATHAN P. LEVINE, INNA MARCUS, JOHN A. SORENSON, RICHARD F. SPAIDE, MICHAEL J. COONEY, K BAILEY FREUND. (2009) MACULAR HEMORRHAGE IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION AFTER STABILIZATION WITH ANTIANGIOGENIC THERAPY. Retina 29:8, 1074-1079
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Anand Swaroop, Emily Y. Chew, Catherine Bowes Rickman, Gonçalo R. Abecasis. (2009) Unraveling a Multifactorial Late-Onset Disease: From Genetic Susceptibility to Disease Mechanisms for Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 10:1, 19-43
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    KIMBERLY E. STEPIEN, PHILIP J. ROSENFELD, CARMEN A. PULIAFITO, WILLIAM FEUER, WEI SHI, LUMA AL-ATTAR, SANDER R. DUBOVY, TIMOTHY G. MURRAY, JANET L. DAVIS, WEN-HSIANG LEE, STEPHEN G. SCHWARTZ, WILLIAM E. SMIDDY, AUDINA M. BERROCAL, HARRY W. FLYNN. (2009) COMPARISON OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB FOLLOWED BY RANIBIZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. Retina 29:8, 1067-1073
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Angela Carneiro, Manuel Falcão, Isabel Azevedo, Fernando Falcão Reis, Raquel Soares. (2009) Multiple effects of bevacizumab in angiogenesis: implications for its use in age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmologica 87:5, 517-523
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Ziad F. Bashshur, Zeina A. Haddad, Alexandre R. Schakal, Rola F. Jaafar, Alain Saad, Baha' N. Noureddin. (2009) Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Treatment of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: The Second Year of a Prospective Study. American Journal of Ophthalmology 148:1, 59-65.e1
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Jana Simonds, Frank Miller, Jess Mandel, Terence M. Davidson. (2009) The effect of bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment on epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. The Laryngoscope 119:5, 988-992
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Aaron L Nelson, Janice M Reichert. (2009) Development trends for therapeutic antibody fragments. Nature Biotechnology 27:4, 331-337
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Ângela Carneiro, Manuel Falcão, Ana Pirraco, Paula Milheiro-Oliveira, Fernando Falcão-Reis, Raquel Soares. (2009) Comparative effects of bevacizumab, ranibizumab and pegaptanib at intravitreal dose range on endothelial cells. Experimental Eye Research 88:3, 522-527
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Lazaros Konstantinidis, Irmela Mantel, Jean-Antoine C. Pournaras, Leonidas Zografos, Aude Ambresin. (2009) Intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis®) for the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 247:3, 311-318
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    MOHAMED A. ELDALY, CAROLINE STYLES. (2009) FIRST VERSUS SECOND EYE INTRAVITREAL RANIBIZUMAB THERAPY FOR WET AMD. Retina 29:3, 325-328
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Ugo Testa, Gaetano Pannitteri, Gian Luigi Condorelli. (2008) Vascular endothelial growth factors in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 9:12, 1190-1221
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Hanna R Coleman, Chi-Chao Chan, Frederick L Ferris, Emily Y Chew. (2008) Age-related macular degeneration. The Lancet 372:9652, 1835-1845
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Nathan Lassota. (2008) Clinical and Histological Aspects of CNV Formation: Studies in an Animal Model. Acta Ophthalmologica 86:thesis2, 1-28
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Sandra Flores Moreno, Javier Bautista Paloma. (2008) Controversies in the Treatment of Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration. American Journal of Ophthalmology 145:5, 937
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Irit Bahar, Igor Kaiserman, Penny McAllum, David Rootman, Allan Slomovic. (2008) Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection for Corneal Neovascularization. Cornea 27:2, 142-147
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Peter Alsop, Scott Metcalfe, Jackie Evans. (2008) Funding a Clinical Trial. PharmacoEconomics 26:10, 811-814
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Jonathan Kimmelman. (2007) Cheap Shots and Pricey Propositions: Evidence, Disclosure, and Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Retina 27:9, 1166-1167
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Marion Mohr-Andrä, Klaus Mohr. (2007) Ranibizumab bei Makuladegeneration. Angiogenese-Hemmung gegen Sehverlust. Pharmazie in unserer Zeit 36:6, 437-440
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Saurabh Aggarwal. (2007) What's fueling the biotech engine?. Nature Biotechnology 25:10, 1097-1104
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Carla Costa, João Incio, Raquel Soares. (2007) Angiogenesis and chronic inflammation: cause or consequence?. Angiogenesis 10:3, 149-166
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Agnès Noël, Maud Jost, Vincent Lambert, Julie Lecomte, Jean-Marie Rakic. (2007) Anti-angiogenic therapy of exudative age-related macular degeneration: current progress and emerging concepts. Trends in Molecular Medicine 13:8, 345-352
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Timothy W. Olsen. (2007) Treatment of Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration: Many Factors to Consider. American Journal of Ophthalmology 144:2, 281-283
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Cristina Hernández, Rafael Simó. (2007) Strategies for blocking angiogenesis in diabetic retinopathy: from basic science to clinical practice. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 16:8, 1209-1226
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    MARCO ZARBIN, BERNARD SZIRTH. (2007) Current Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Optometry and Vision Science 84:7, E559-E572
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Quoc T. Ho, Calvin J. Kuo. (2007) Vascular endothelial growth factor: Biology and therapeutic applications. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 39:7-8, 1349-1357
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    B. C. M. Witjes. (2007) Pathogenese leeftijdgebonden maculadegeneratie. MFM 45:6, 157-158
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Frank D. Kolodgie, Jagat Narula, Chun Yuan, Allen P. Burke, Aloke V. Finn, Renu Virmani. (2007) Elimination of Neoangiogenesis for Plaque Stabilization. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 49:21, 2093-2101
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Arthur Kavanaugh. (2007) Economic issues with new rheumatologic therapeutics. Current Opinion in Rheumatology 19:3, 272-276
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    (2007) Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. New England Journal of Medicine 356:7, 747-750
    Full Text

  54. 54

    Eiichi Nemoto, Hideo Ueda, Masayuki Akimoto, Hideshi Natsume, Yasunori Morimoto. (2007) Ability of Poly-L-arginine to Enhance Drug Absorption into Aqueous Humor and Vitreous Body after Instillation in Rabbits. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 30:9, 1768-1772
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Stone, Edwin M., . (2006) A Very Effective Treatment for Neovascular Macular Degeneration. New England Journal of Medicine 355:14, 1493-1495
    Full Text