Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Perspective

Focus on Research

T-Cell Costimulation — Biology, Therapeutic Potential, and Challenges

Arlene H. Sharpe, M.D., Ph.D., and Abul K. Abbas, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2006; 355:973-975September 7, 2006

Article

The immune system has the remarkable ability to defend against diverse microbial pathogens and yet not to respond to self. T cells are key mediators of the immune response, and their activation is tightly regulated to prevent autoreactivity. The processes of T-cell activation and self-tolerance are therefore potential targets for manipulation by drugs — hence, the recent phase 1 trial of a “superagonistic” monoclonal anti-CD28 antibody that was conducted in Britain on behalf of the German firm TeGenero, with the unexpected and devastating results described by Suntharalingam et al. in this issue of the Journal (pages 1018–1028).

T-cell activation requires two signals that are delivered by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) (see diagramRoles of the B7–CD28/CTLA-4 Pathway in Regulating T-Cell Activation.). The first signal is antigen displayed by APCs in the form of peptides bound to histocompatibility molecules; the recognition of antigen by T-cell receptors provides specificity to the response. The second signal, called the “costimulatory signal” because it stimulates T cells in conjunction with antigen, is provided by molecules on APCs that engage particular costimulatory receptors on T cells. In the absence of costimulation, T cells that recognize antigen either fail to respond and die or enter a state of unresponsiveness known as anergy. Thus, costimulation is a key determinant of the outcome of a T cell's encounter with antigen.

The best-characterized T-cell costimulatory pathway involves the CD28 receptor, which binds to two costimulatory molecules, B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86).1 CD28 is constitutively expressed on all T cells in mice and on 95% of CD4+ T cells and 50% of CD8+ T cells in humans. B7-1 and B7-2 are expressed mainly on APCs, including dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells. The expression of B7-1 and B7-2 on APCs is enhanced by the presence of microbes and by cytokines that are produced in response to microbes. This regulated expression of B7 costimulators ensures that T cells respond best only when necessary — that is, when faced with pathogens.

The interaction of B7-1 and B7-2 with CD28, in concert with T-cell–receptor signaling, promotes the expansion of antigen-stimulated T cells and their differentiation into effector and memory cells. CD28 is the major costimulatory receptor for naive T cells and is therefore important for initiating T-cell responses. CD28 signals enhance the production of interleukin-2 and other cytokines, up-regulate cell-survival genes (such as Bcl-xL ), promote energy metabolism (glucose uptake and rate of glycolysis), and facilitate cell-cycle progression. The effects of the binding of B7 to CD28 can be mimicked by cross-linking antibodies directed against this receptor. Most of the antibodies that have been developed against CD28 in mice and humans have no biologic effects on their own but are potent costimulators when given with antigen or mimics of antigen. There is one notable exception, however: an anti-CD28 antibody, called a superagonistic antibody, activates T cells in the apparent absence of the overt engagement of the antigen receptor.2 The basis for this unusual action and its physiological implications are not clearly defined, but it may involve amplification of tonic T-cell–receptor signals.

B7–CD28 signals also play a critical role in the development and survival of a class of T cells called regulatory T cells, whose function is to inhibit immune responses and maintain self-tolerance. The fundamental importance of regulatory T cells in immune regulation, together with their therapeutic potential for suppressing pathologic immune responses, has prompted investigation of their development and function.3 The development of regulatory T cells in the thymus requires CD28-stimulated production of interleukin-2. In the periphery, CD28 signaling and interleukin-2 are needed for the survival of regulatory T cells. On the basis of these findings, antibody against T-cell receptors, anti-CD28 antibody, and interleukin-2 — alone and in combination — are being used to expand regulatory T cells for cellular therapy.

Although T-cell costimulatory pathways were initially identified as stimulators of T-cell responses, it is now clear that some costimulatory receptors can inhibit T cells. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) is a CD28 homologue that also binds to B7-1 and B7-2 but is expressed in an inducible fashion after T-cell activation.1 Unlike CD28, CTLA-4 shuts off T-cell responses by inhibiting interleukin-2 production and blocking cell-cycle progression. Thus, CTLA-4 is involved in the induction and maintenance of T-cell tolerance. The critical importance of CTLA-4 as a negative regulator of the immune response is underscored by the phenotype of CTLA-4–deficient mice, which includes massive T-cell activation and proliferation and T-cell–mediated tissue damage. CTLA-4 polymorphisms in humans have been linked to susceptibility to autoimmune diseases, including type 1 diabetes and autoimmune thyroid disease.

The pivotal role of costimulation in regulating T-cell activation versus tolerance has stimulated great interest in the manipulation of costimulatory signals to either boost immune responses (in order to enhance antimicrobial and antitumor immunity) or induce tolerance (in order to treat autoimmune diseases and prevent graft rejection). The therapeutic potential of manipulation of the B7–CD28 costimulatory pathway is demonstrated by the clinical success of CTLA-4–Ig, a soluble fusion protein containing the extracellular domain of CTLA-4 linked to an IgG Fc region.4 CTLA-4–Ig binds to B7-1 and B7-2 and works by blocking costimulation through CD28. Studies in animal models have shown that brief treatment with CTLA-4–Ig results in long-term allograft survival and amelioration of autoimmune diseases. CTLA-4–Ig (abatacept, or Orencia) was recently approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and clinical trials for other indications are in progress. A blocking anti–CTLA-4 antibody is being tested in clinical trials as a means of stimulating antitumor immunity by reducing inhibitory signals (the converse of CTLA-4–Ig, which blocks activating signals through the B7–CD28 pathway).

The therapeutic targeting of CD28 faces fundamental challenges because of the multiple, and opposing, biologic roles of this costimulatory receptor.4 For instance, in most situations, the blockage or elimination of B7–CD28 signaling inhibits T-cell activation, but in at least one mouse model of type 1 diabetes, the same manipulation exacerbates the disease by eliminating regulatory T cells. Conversely, stimulation through CD28 may activate pathogenic effector T cells as well as protective regulatory T cells. The superagonistic anti-CD28 antibody has been shown to potently activate regulatory T cells in mice and to prevent and even ameliorate disease in several mouse models.5

It is unclear why the superagonistic anti-CD28 antibody apparently activates pathogenic effector T cells in humans (as was revealed by the unfortunate adverse effects in the clinical trial sponsored by TeGenero) but not in mouse models (as suggested by the preclinical studies). Most preclinical studies are conducted in inbred mice, and their differences from outbred humans are important to consider. One difference not often appreciated is that in laboratory mice, which are typically housed in pathogen-free conditions, the majority of the T cells are naive. In striking contrast, as humans age in their microbe-rich natural habitat, the numbers of previously activated memory T cells increase. Since the activation requirements of memory cells are generally much less stringent than those of naive cells, agonistic antibodies that do not induce widespread immune activation in laboratory mice (with predominantly naive T cells) may nevertheless be capable of doing so in humans (who have more memory cells).

Another factor may be the different affinities of the anti-CD28 antibodies used in the preclinical studies and those used in the clinical trial sponsored by TeGenero. For example, the anti–human-CD28 antibody probably binds to CD28 in nonhuman primates more weakly than it does to CD28 in humans, so the resultant T-cell stimulation may be less robust in primate T cells than in human T cells. Such considerations of affinity may be especially critical with regard to agonistic antibodies.

The use of agents that block or activate costimulatory pathways will undoubtedly require a better understanding of how the diverse biologic activities of these pathways are orchestrated, better biomarkers to predict outcomes of the manipulation of T-cell costimulation in humans, and preclinical studies with established predictive value. The encouraging success of CTLA-4–Ig supports the therapeutic potential of manipulating costimulatory pathways.

This article was published at www.nejm.org on August 14, 2006.

Source Information

Dr. Sharpe is a professor of pathology at Harvard Medical School, Boston. Dr. Abbas is a professor and chair of the Department of Pathology at the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.

References

References

  1. 1

    Greenwald RJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. The B7 family revisited. Annu Rev Immunol 2005;23:515-548
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Hunig T, Dennehy K. CD28 superagonists: mode of action and therapeutic potential. Immunol Lett 2005;100:21-28
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Bluestone JA, Abbas AK. Natural versus adaptive regulatory T cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2003;3:253-257
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Bluestone JA, St Clair EW, Turka LA. CTLA4Ig: bridging the basic immunology with clinical application. Immunity 2006;24:233-238
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Beyersdorf N, Gaupp S, Balbach K, et al. Selective targeting of regulatory T cells with CD28 superagonists allows effective therapy of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med 2005;202:445-455
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (39)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    M. Labowsky, T.M. Fahmy. (2012) Diffusive transfer between two intensely interacting cells with limited surface kinetics. Chemical Engineering Science
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Bart O Roep, Jane Buckner, Stephen Sawcer, Rene Toes, Frauke Zipp. (2012) The problems and promises of research into human immunology and autoimmune disease. Nature Medicine 18:1, 48-53
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Yue She, Nan Wang, Chongxiao Chen, Yanzhu Zhu, Shiliang Xia, Chongwei Hu, Yanfei Li. (2011) Effects of Aluminum on Immune Functions of Cultured Splenic T and B Lymphocytes in Rats. Biological Trace Element Research
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Yongjun Shang, Guoning Guo, Qifu Cui, Jinlong Li, Zhihua Ruan, Yongwen Chen. (2011) The Expression and Anatomical Distribution of BTLA and Its Ligand HVEM in Rheumatoid Synovium. Inflammation
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Guoning Guo, Yongjun Shang, Guoyan Zhu, Xiaoren Bao, Shiwei Xu, Yongwen Chen. (2011) The expression and distribution of immunomodulatory proteins B7-H1, B7-DC, B7-H3, and B7-H4 in rheumatoid synovium. Clinical Rheumatology
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Valeria Sordi, Lorenzo Piemonti. (2011) Therapeutic plasticity of stem cells and allograft tolerance. Cytotherapy 13:6, 647-660
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Lucy Findlay, Giles Sharp, Bernard Fox, Christina Ball, C. Jane Robinson, Christopher Bird, Richard Stebbings, David Eastwood, Meenu Wadhwa, Stephen Poole, Robin Thorpe, Susan J. Thorpe. (2011) Endothelial cells co-stimulate peripheral blood mononuclear cell responses to monoclonal antibody TGN1412 in culture. Cytokine 55:1, 141-151
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Matthew B Carroll. (2011) The impact of biologic response modifiers on hepatitis B virus infection. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 11:4, 533-544
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Simin Goral. (2011) The three-signal hypothesis of lymphocyte activation/targets for immunosuppression. Dialysis & Transplantation 40:1, 14-16
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Zhihang Chen, Ruorui Liu, Jinjing Che, Hongjiao Shi, Yunan Hou, Yunlong Liu, Lili Sun, Li Tan, Chengqi Shan, Peisheng Hu, Yuanguo Cheng. (2011) Qualitative and quantitative studies on human B7.1-Fc fusion protein and the application in pharmacokinetic study in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 54:1, 133-140
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Ester Fonsatti, Michele Maio, Maresa Altomonte, Peter Hersey. (2010) Biology and Clinical Applications of CD40 in Cancer Treatment. Seminars in Oncology 37:5, 517-523
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    E. Laresgoiti-Servitje, N. Gomez-Lopez, D. M. Olson. (2010) An immunological insight into the origins of pre-eclampsia. Human Reproduction Update 16:5, 510-524
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Lorrene A. Buckley, Parag Garhyan, Rafael Ponce, Stanley A. Roberts. 2010. Estimation of Human Starting Dose for Phase I Clinical Programs. , 421-463.
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Trevor T. Hansel, Harald Kropshofer, Thomas Singer, Jane A. Mitchell, Andrew J. T. George. (2010) The safety and side effects of monoclonal antibodies. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 9:4, 325-338
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Jennifer Visich, Rafael Ponce. 2010. Science and Judgment in Establishing a Safe Starting Dose for First-in-Human Trials of Biopharmaceuticals. .
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Diane R. Mould, Bruce Green. (2010) Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Monoclonal Antibodies. BioDrugs 24:1, 23-39
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Shengxi Wu, Chengying Yang, Sheng Guo, Lei Fei, Na Luo, Xiaolan Fu, Yongwen Chen, Yuzhang Wu. (2010) Stimulation of B7-H1 in Hepatocarcinoma Cells by Hepatitis B virus X Antigen. Immunological Investigations 39:7, 754-769
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Honghui Zhou, Hugh M. Davis. (2009) Risk-based strategy for the assessment of pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Drug Discovery Today 14:17-18, 891-898
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Sara Kaprove Penn, Larry W. Moreland. 2009. Abatacept. , 356-361.
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Ugo Fiocco, Paolo Sfriso, Francesca Oliviero, Elisa Pagnin, Elena Scagliori, Carla Campana, Serena Dainese, Luisella Cozzi, Leonardo Punzi. (2008) Co-stimulatory modulation in rheumatoid arthritis: The role of (CTLA4-Ig) abatacept. Autoimmunity Reviews 8:1, 76-82
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    D. Schrama, A. Hauschild, J.C. Becker. (2008) Immunmodulierende Antikörper in der Dermatoonkologie. Der Hautarzt 59:10, 806-813
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    W.J. Lesterhuis, E.H.J.G. Aarntzen, I.J.M. De Vries, D.H. Schuurhuis, C.G. Figdor, G.J. Adema, C.J.A. Punt. (2008) Dendritic cell vaccines in melanoma: From promise to proof?. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 66:2, 118-134
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Robert R. Rich. 2008. The human immune response. , 3-16.
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Margaret J. Dallman. 2008. Immunology of Graft Rejection. , 9-32.
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Sarang Chitale, Robert Moots. (2008) Abatacept: the first T lymphocyte co-stimulation modulator, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 8:1, 115-122
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Steven J. O'Day, Omid Hamid, Walter J. Urba. (2007) Targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Cancer 110:12, 2614-2627
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Leonard H. Sigal. (2007) Basic Science for the Clinician 46. JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology 13:5, 286-290
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    C. Andrew Boswell, Martin W. Brechbiel. (2007) Development of radioimmunotherapeutic and diagnostic antibodies: an inside-out view. Nuclear Medicine and Biology 34:7, 757-778
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Raymond W. Redline. (2007) Villitis of unknown etiology: noninfectious chronic villitis in the placenta. Human Pathology 38:10, 1439-1446
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Nanna Fyhrquist-Vanni, Harri Alenius, Antti Lauerma. (2007) Contact Dermatitis. Dermatologic Clinics 25:4, 613-623
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Achim Rothe, Anne Nathanielsz, Ralf J. Hosse, Frank Oberhäuser, Elke P. Strandmann, Andreas Engert, Peter J. Hudson, Barbara E. Power. (2007) Selection of human anti-CD28 scFvs from a T-NHL related scFv library using ribosome display. Journal of Biotechnology 130:4, 448-454
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    A. Otte. (2007) Arzneimitteltestung am Menschen. Der Internist 48:6, 636-641
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Lydie Trautmann, Elias A Said, Rabih Halwani, Loury Janbazian, Nicolas Chomont, Mohamed El-Far, Gaëlle Breton, Elias K Haddad, Rafick-Pierre Sekaly. (2007) Programmed death 1: a critical regulator of T-cell function and a strong target for immunotherapies for chronic viral infections. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 2:3, 219-227
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    James B. Bussel, Lisa Giulino, Susan Lee, Vivek L. Patel, Christy Sandborg, E. Richard Stiehm. (2007) Update on Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care 37:4, 118-135
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    E. William St. Clair, Larry A. Turka, Andrew Saxon, Jeffrey B. Matthews, Mohamed H. Sayegh, George S. Eisenbarth, Jeffrey Bluestone. (2007) New Reagents on the Horizon for Immune Tolerance. Annual Review of Medicine 58:1, 329-346
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    (2006) T-Cell Costimulation. New England Journal of Medicine 355:24, 2594-2595
    Full Text

  37. 37

    Marc Ohresser, Daniel Olive, Bernard Vanhove, Hervé Watier. (2006) Risk in drug trials. The Lancet 368:9554, 2205-2206
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Jeremy Sugarman, Carol Levine. (2006) Risk in drug trials. The Lancet 368:9554, 2205
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Drazen, Jeffrey M., . (2006) Volunteers at Risk. New England Journal of Medicine 355:10, 1060-1061
    Full Text

Letters

Trends: Most Viewed (Last Week)

More Trends