Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Association between Body-Mass Index and Risk of Death in More Than 1 Million Asians

Wei Zheng, M.D., Ph.D., Dale F. McLerran, M.S., Betsy Rolland, M.L.I.S., Xianglan Zhang, M.D., M.P.H., Manami Inoue, M.D., Ph.D., Keitaro Matsuo, M.D., Ph.D., Jiang He, M.D., Ph.D., Prakash Chandra Gupta, Sc.D., Kunnambath Ramadas, M.D., Shoichiro Tsugane, M.D., Ph.D., Fujiko Irie, M.D., Ph.D., Akiko Tamakoshi, M.D., Ph.D., Yu-Tang Gao, M.D., Renwei Wang, M.D., Xiao-Ou Shu, M.D., Ph.D., Ichiro Tsuji, M.D., Ph.D., Shinichi Kuriyama, M.D., Hideo Tanaka, M.D., Ph.D., Hiroshi Satoh, M.D., Ph.D., Chien-Jen Chen, Sc.D., Jian-Min Yuan, M.D., Ph.D., Keun-Young Yoo, M.D., Ph.D., Habibul Ahsan, M.D., Wen-Harn Pan, Ph.D., Dongfeng Gu, M.D., Ph.D., Mangesh Suryakant Pednekar, Ph.D., Catherine Sauvaget, M.D., Ph.D., Shizuka Sasazuki, M.D., Ph.D., Toshimi Sairenchi, Ph.D., Gong Yang, M.D., M.P.H., Yong-Bing Xiang, M.D., M.Ph., Masato Nagai, M.Sc., Takeshi Suzuki, M.D., Ph.D., Yoshikazu Nishino, M.D., Ph.D., San-Lin You, Ph.D., Woon-Puay Koh, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Sue K. Park, M.D., Ph.D., Yu Chen, Ph.D., Chen-Yang Shen, Ph.D., Mark Thornquist, Ph.D., Ziding Feng, Ph.D., Daehee Kang, M.D., Ph.D., Paolo Boffetta, M.D., M.P.H., and John D. Potter, M.D., Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 2011; 364:719-729February 24, 2011

Abstract

Background

Most studies that have evaluated the association between the body-mass index (BMI) and the risks of death from any cause and from specific causes have been conducted in populations of European origin.

Methods

We performed pooled analyses to evaluate the association between BMI and the risk of death among more than 1.1 million persons recruited in 19 cohorts in Asia. The analyses included approximately 120,700 deaths that occurred during a mean follow-up period of 9.2 years. Cox regression models were used to adjust for confounding factors.

Results

In the cohorts of East Asians, including Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans, the lowest risk of death was seen among persons with a BMI (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) in the range of 22.6 to 27.5. The risk was elevated among persons with BMI levels either higher or lower than that range — by a factor of up to 1.5 among those with a BMI of more than 35.0 and by a factor of 2.8 among those with a BMI of 15.0 or less. A similar U-shaped association was seen between BMI and the risks of death from cancer, from cardiovascular diseases, and from other causes. In the cohorts comprising Indians and Bangladeshis, the risks of death from any cause and from causes other than cancer or cardiovascular disease were increased among persons with a BMI of 20.0 or less, as compared with those with a BMI of 22.6 to 25.0, whereas there was no excess risk of either death from any cause or cause-specific death associated with a high BMI.

Conclusions

Underweight was associated with a substantially increased risk of death in all Asian populations. The excess risk of death associated with a high BMI, however, was seen among East Asians but not among Indians and Bangladeshis.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Association between Body-Mass Index and Risk of Cause-Specific Death in Two Asian Populations.
Figure 2Association between the Body-Mass Index and the Risk of Death from Respiratory Diseases or Other Causes.
Article

Over the past few decades, there has been a dramatic increase in the prevalence of obesity in many countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that more than 1 billion adults worldwide are overweight; of these, at least 300 million are obese.1 A large number of epidemiologic studies have evaluated the associations between body weight and, more often, the body-mass index (BMI; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) and a wide range of health outcomes. Obesity is associated with multiple chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, and several cancers.2 Since most of the studies have been conducted in populations of European origin, however, the dose–response relationship between BMI and the overall risk of death among Asians, who account for more than 60% of the world population, remains unclear.

The definitions of overweight (BMI ≥25.0) and obesity (BMI ≥30.0) are based essentially on criteria derived from studies that involved populations of European origin. The validity of these criteria in Asian populations has yet to be determined. It has been suggested that the associations of BMI with body composition and health outcomes may differ between Asian and European populations.3 Studies have shown that for a given BMI, Asians generally have a higher percentage of body fat than do Europeans. 3 Asian populations have also been shown to have an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia at a relatively low level of BMI.3 On the basis of these observations, it has been proposed that the BMI cutoff points for overweight and obesity should be lower for Asian populations than they are for European populations (suggested cutoff points for Asians, ≥23.0 for overweight and ≥27.5 for obesity).3 However, a 2004 consensus statement from the WHO concluded that the available data were not sufficient to support Asian-specific cutoff points to define overweight and obesity.3 The optimal weight range associated with a minimal risk of death in Asian populations remains controversial.

To address these unresolved issues, we evaluated the relationship between BMI and the risk of death using data from 19 cohorts, involving more than 1 million participants. Conducted as part of the Asia Cohort Consortium, this pooling project, with its large sample, provides the opportunity not only to address carefully the methodologic challenges that cannot be handled adequately in any single study but also to evaluate the associations according to major Asian ethnic groups.

Methods

Study Population

We identified cohorts that would be potentially eligible for inclusion in the Asia Cohort Consortium BMI Project through a systematic search of the literature in early 2008, followed by a survey that was sent to the investigators associated with each cohort to further determine eligibility for the study. A total of 19 cohorts were included in the pooling project. With the exception of the Taiwan Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Two-Township Study (CVDFACTS) cohort, all the cohorts had accrued at least 5 years of follow-up data and included a minimum of 10,000 participants with baseline data on BMI. All the participating cohorts were required to have available baseline data on BMI, age, sex, and cigarette-smoking status and follow-up data on deaths from any cause. Additional data were collected on selected baseline illnesses and cause-specific deaths. Individual data from participating cohorts were collected and harmonized for the statistical analysis. This study was approved by the ethics committee overseeing each of the participating studies and by the ethics committee at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Written or oral consent was obtained from all the subjects who participated in the study.

A total of 1,155,676 subjects were included in the 19 participating cohorts. We excluded from the analysis subjects with missing data on age (2 subjects), BMI (13,780), and vital status (7). In addition, we excluded subjects who were younger than 18 years of age (14 subjects), those who had a BMI of more than 50 (174), and those for whom data on survival were invalid or missing (105). After these exclusions, 1,141,609 subjects remained (535,199 men and 606,410 women).

Statistical Analysis

The association between BMI and the risk of death was analyzed with the use of Cox proportional-hazards regression models, with a categorical representation of BMI as the predictor variable. To define BMI groups for the analysis, we used the BMI cutoff points of more than 25.0 for overweight and more than 30.0 for obesity. We then established 10 BMI levels that included the lowest BMI group (≤15.0) and the highest (>35.0) and 8 levels in between, each comprising 2.5 BMI units (i.e., ≤15.0, 15.1 to 17.5, 17.6 to 20.0 . . . 32.6 to 35.0, and >35.0). Using the BMI range of 22.6 to 25.0 as the reference, we estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the other BMI ranges, after adjusting for potential confounders, including baseline age, sex, educational level, urban or rural residence, and marital status. We performed additional analyses in which we also adjusted for the variables of cigarette-smoking status (former or current smoker vs. lifetime nonsmoker) and status with respect to known baseline conditions (cancer, coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and hypertension). Analyses were performed separately on data from the Indian and Bangladeshi population and the East Asian population (Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans), since there is considerable heterogeneity between these two populations. Prespecified stratified analyses were performed according to smoking status and sex to evaluate the consistency of the associations. Some analyses were performed among lifetime nonsmokers to eliminate the potential confounding effect of cigarette smoking on the association between BMI and the risk of death. To minimize the influence of possible “reverse causation” (illnesses causing low BMI) owing to the presence of terminal diseases at baseline in some subjects, we excluded the first 3 years of follow-up and restricted some analyses to subjects who did not have a history of cardiovascular disease, stroke, or cancer at baseline and other analyses to lifetime nonsmokers without these conditions at baseline. The ages of the subjects when they entered and exited the cohort were used to define the time variable in the Cox models. The age at exit from the cohort was defined as the age at death or the age at the end of the follow-up period, whichever was earlier.

In the models, the effect of BMI on the risk of death was assumed to be cohort-specific. For each cohort, we assumed that the log hazard ratio for BMI had a fixed-effect component that was common to all cohorts within each of the two major Asian populations (one comprising East Asians and the other compromising Indians and Bangladeshis) and a random effect that was cohort-specific. The random effects for the log hazard ratios were assumed to be normally distributed, with mean zero; that is, we assumed that β̂ij, the estimated log hazard ratio for the BMI level in a cohort, where j is the BMI level and i is the cohort, has the distribution β̂ ij ~ N j , σ̂2 ij + τ̂2 j ), where σ̂2 ij is the within-study variance of β̂ ij and τ̂2 j is the between-cohort variance of β̂ ij , as estimated from the Cox regression model.4,5 The β j parameters and their 95% confidence intervals were estimated in the meta-analysis. Cox model estimation for each cohort was performed with the use of the PHREG procedure in SAS, version 9.2. The meta-analysis estimation was performed with the use of the PROC MIXED procedure in SAS.

Results

Study Population

More than 1.14 million participants from 19 cohorts were included in the analysis (Table 1Table 1Characteristics of the Participating Cohorts.). Overall, the mean (±SD) BMI for the study population was 22.9±3.6 (range, 19.8 to 23.7). Nearly 34% of the study subjects were current or former smokers. Over a mean follow-up period of 9.2 years, approximately 120,700 cohort members died. Approximately two thirds of the deaths were due to cardiovascular diseases (35.7%) or cancer (29.9%), and the other third to other causes (34.3%). Considerable variation, however, existed across the cohorts.

Association between BMI and Risk of Death from Any Cause

In both Asian populations, the adjusted hazard ratios for death from any cause were elevated among groups with BMIs lower than the reference range of 22.6 to 25.0 (Table 2Table 2Association between Body-Mass Index and Risk of Death from Any Cause in Two Asian Populations, According to Smoking Status.). Subjects in the lowest BMI group (≤15.0) had a risk that was increased by a factor of approximately 2.0 to 2.8. Among groups with BMIs higher than the reference range, the hazard ratios for death from any cause were elevated in the East Asian population but not in the Indian and Bangladeshi population. In general, the magnitude of the association was similar between subjects who were current or former smokers and those who were lifetime nonsmokers. The results for men and women were similar to the results of combined analyses of data from men and women (Table 1 and Table 2 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org).

To evaluate the possible influence of reverse causation, we performed analyses that excluded subjects with a baseline diagnosis of coronary heart disease, stroke, or cancer (Table 3Table 3Association between Body-Mass Index and Risk of Death from Any Cause in Subgroup Analyses Designed to Address Reverse Causation.). Excluding these subjects had only a minimal effect on the point estimate of hazard ratios for the association between BMI and the risk of death from any cause. Excluding 2 additional years of follow-up (i.e., excluding the first 5 years instead of the first 3 years) slightly attenuated the positive association of the risk of death with low BMI but had no effect on the results for high-BMI groups. In an analysis in which current or former smokers were excluded, the elevated risk associated with a lower BMI was attenuated, whereas the positive association with a higher BMI among East Asians was slightly strengthened. No positive association between death from any cause and a high BMI was seen in the Indian and Bangladeshi population in any of the analyses, regardless of the types of exclusions. These results indicate that any possible reverse causation was adequately addressed in the analyses that were performed on data from lifetime nonsmokers, after the exclusion of deaths that occurred within the first 3 years of follow-up — an approach that was used in all the main analyses in this study.

Association between BMI and Risk of Death from Specific Causes

As with the findings for death from any cause, a U-shaped association was seen between BMI and the risk of death from cardiovascular disease, cancer, or other causes among East Asians but not among Indians and Bangladeshis (Figure 1Figure 1Association between Body-Mass Index and Risk of Cause-Specific Death in Two Asian Populations.). In fact, no elevated risk of death from any of these three causes was seen in the high-BMI groups of Indians and Bangladeshis. The positive association between a low BMI and the risk of death was strongest for death from causes other than cardiovascular disease or cancer. The results of analyses stratified according to smoking status were, in general, consistent with the pattern shown in Figure 1, although point estimates for some BMI categories were not significant, owing to the small sample (Table 3 and Table 4 in the Supplementary Appendix).

The strikingly positive association between low BMI and death from causes other than cardiovascular disease or cancer was primarily the result of deaths due to respiratory diseases (Figure 2Figure 2Association between the Body-Mass Index and the Risk of Death from Respiratory Diseases or Other Causes.). After exclusion of deaths from respiratory diseases, the positive association with low BMI was substantially reduced. The association between BMI and death from respiratory diseases was similar in smokers and nonsmokers (Figure 1 in the Supplementary Appendix). It is possible that the strong association observed between low BMI and death from respiratory diseases could be explained, in part, by reverse causation, since respiratory disease can lead to weight loss long before the clinical diagnosis is made.

Discussion

In the pooled analysis of approximately 850,000 East Asians, both a low BMI and a high BMI were associated with an increased risk of death from any cause and of cause-specific death, resulting in an overall U-shaped association. Analyses of data from more than 287,000 Indians and Bangladeshis, however, showed an elevated risk of death only among those with a low BMI. This large pooled analysis not only provides reliable estimates of the overall effect of BMI on the risk of death from any cause and of cause-specific death among Asians, but also offers opportunities for a careful evaluation of the association between low BMI and the risk of death that could not be adequately investigated in most previous studies, which were conducted in populations of European origin.

A U-shaped association between BMI and the risk of death was also seen in a recent pooled analysis of data from the Prospective Studies Collaboration (PSC), involving 900,000 participants in 57 prospective studies, mostly in Western Europe and North America.6 Only 8% of the PSC populations were Asians (Japanese). In our analysis of data from Indians and Bangladeshis, however, a virtually inverse association between BMI and death from any cause was seen. Even among East Asians, the shape of the curve for the association in our analysis was quite different from that in the PSC, as were the hazard ratios (which were higher at the low-BMI range among Asians than in the European population and higher at the high-BMI range in the European population than among Asians). Over the past 10 years, several large cohort studies have also evaluated the association between BMI and the risk of death, again mostly in populations of European origin.6-10 Although the BMI groupings that were used varied among the studies, these studies, in general, have shown that the lowest risk of death is associated with a BMI in the range of 23 to 27, regardless of the study population. The finding that the same optimal weight range is associated with the lowest risk of death both in the current study of East Asians and in previous studies involving populations of European origin argues strongly against the use of race- or ethnicity-specific BMI cutoff points to define overweight and obesity.

In a longitudinal analysis of approximately 1.2 million Koreans in the Korean Cancer Prevention Study (KCPS), Jee et al. reported a J-shaped association between BMI and the risk of death from any cause.9 The BMI category associated with the lowest overall risk of death was 21.5 to 27.9 in the KCPS, which is similar to the findings among East Asians in our study (Tables 5, 6, and 7 in the Supplementary Appendix). However, for some of the analyses, the magnitude of the associations differs between the KCPS and our study. Extensive exclusions were made in the KCPS; subjects with a baseline diagnosis of coronary heart disease, cancer, liver disease, diabetes, stroke, or respiratory disease were not included in that study. Most other cohort studies have not made such extensive exclusions from their analyses, nor did we in our study. Because only about 16,000 Koreans were included in our analysis, the East Asian group in our study consisted primarily of Chinese and Japanese subjects. Therefore, differences in characteristics across these populations could also contribute to inconsistencies between the findings of our study and those of the KCPS.

Although the risk of death is the most critical measure of the health consequences of excess adiposity, epidemiologic studies examining the relationship between body weight and the risk of death are fraught with methodologic challenges.11,12 The most important of these is the problem of reverse causation, in which weight loss resulting from illness can distort the relationship between leanness and health. An additional concern is confounding, mainly by smoking status, since smokers often have a lower body mass than do nonsmokers. To address these problems, investigators in multiple studies have performed analyses using data from nonsmokers only and from people who reported no serious underlying illness at the time of enrollment or have excluded from the analyses the early years of follow-up.13-16 However, in our study, the PSC project, and the KCPS, as well as in some other large cohort studies,6-10 a J-shaped or U-shaped relation between BMI and the risk of death persisted after major methodologic issues were addressed.

There is substantial evidence supporting the biologic plausibility of a positive association between excess adiposity and the risk of death. Obesity is a well-established risk factor for numerous chronic diseases.2 Adipose tissue has been increasingly recognized as an active endocrine organ, capable of releasing a large number of cytokines and bioactive mediators that play important roles in the pathogenesis of many obesity-related diseases.17 In contrast, the increased risk of death associated with a low BMI, observed in our study and in other studies, remains to be fully explained. Inadequate or incomplete control for confounding or reverse-causation bias could in part explain the increased risk.18 A residual influence of reverse causation may remain in our study, particularly since we did not have information on the presence of infections and on diagnoses of chronic lung disease at baseline; therefore, data from subjects with those conditions could not be excluded from our analysis. A low BMI can be an indicator of certain other chronic medical conditions that were not adequately controlled in the study or an indicator of poor health or a low standard of living, which may contribute to such conditions as undernutrition and may increase the risk of premature death.19 Several cohort studies have shown that, even among persons with a low BMI, an elevated waist-to-hip ratio or waist circumference (each of which is a measure of abdominal adiposity) was associated with a significantly increased risk of death10,20; this suggests that the observed excess risk of death among subjects with a low BMI may be due, in part, to abdominal adiposity, which cannot be assessed adequately on the basis of the BMI.21

We did not assess the risk of death in relation to abdominal obesity, which may be a particularly important factor in Asian populations. In the case of several cohorts participating in this consortium, the interval between the assessment of BMI and the ascertainment of the outcome of death was relatively short, raising concern about the effects of subclinical or undiagnosed chronic diseases on the results. Data from subjects with self-reported height and weight measurements were included in our analysis, although the pattern of association between BMI and death from any cause was similar regardless of the method for assessing height and weight (Table 9 in the Supplementary Appendix). Socioeconomic status could confound the association between BMI and the risk of death, since in less well-developed countries, people with a high BMI are more likely to have a high socioeconomic status (and thus better access to health care) than are those with a lower BMI. Although we adjusted for several indicators of socioeconomic status, such as educational level, which is a major measure of socioeconomic status, it is possible that residual confounding effects of socioeconomic status remain that could attenuate the positive association between high BMI and the risk of death.

In conclusion, this large pooled analysis revealed a U-shaped association between BMI and the risk of death in East Asians, with a pattern broadly similar to that seen in previous studies involving mostly North American and European populations. In Indians and Bangladeshis, however, no elevated risk of either death from any cause or cause-specific death was seen in high-BMI groups. Overall, the risk of death among Asians, as compared with Europeans, seems to be more strongly affected by a low BMI than by a high BMI. Given the limitations of the current study, in which the risk of death was used as the outcome, additional studies are needed to quantify the association between BMI and the incidence of disease, in order to better define BMI criteria for overweight and obesity in Asians.

Dr. Gupta reports receiving consulting fees from the CDC Foundation for Global Adult Tobacco Survey. His institution, Healis–Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, has received grants from the World Lung Foundation for advancing tobacco control in India and consulting fees from the Institute for Community Research for a project on the use of smokeless tobacco in an urban slum in Mumbai, India.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Source Information

The authors' affiliations are listed in the Appendix.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Zheng at Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave., 8th Fl., Nashville, TN 37203-1738, or at .

Appendix

The authors' affiliations are as follows: the Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt–Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville (W.Z., X.Z., X.-O.S., G.Y.); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle (D.F.M., B.R., M.T., Z.F., J.D.P.); the Epidemiology and Prevention Division, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, Tokyo (M.I., S.T., S.S.), the Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute (K.M., H.T.), and the Department of Medical Oncology and Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science (T. Suzuki) — both in Nagoya, the Department of Health and Social Services, Ibaraki Prefectural Government, Ibaraki (F.I.); the Department of Public Health, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Aichi (A.T.), the Division of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Forensic Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine (I.T., S.K., M.N.), and Environmental Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine (H.S.) — both in Sendai, the Department of Public Health, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi (T. Sairenchi), and the Division of Epidemiology, Miyagi Cancer Center Research Institute, Miyagi (Y.N.) — all in Japan; the Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans (J.H.); Healis–Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Mumbai (P.C.G., M.S.P.), and the Division of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Center, Medical College Campus, Trivandrum (K.R.) — both in India; the Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China (Y.-T.G., Y.-B.X.); Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (R.W., J.-M.Y.); Genomics Research Center (C.-J.C., S.-L.Y.), the Institute of Biomedical Sciences (W.-H.P.), and Taiwan Biobank, Institute of Biomedical Sciences (C.-Y.S.) — all at Academia Sinica, Taipei, the Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health (C.-J.C., W.-H.P.), and the Department of Biochemical Science and Technology (W.-H.P.), National Taiwan University, Taipei, and the Graduate Institute of Environmental Science, China Medical University, Taichung (C.-Y.S.) — all in Taiwan; the Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine (K.-Y.Y., D.K.), and the Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Cancer Research Institute, and Institute of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University (S.K.P.) — both in Seoul, South Korea; the Department of Health Studies, Medicine and Human Genetics and Cancer Research Center, University of Chicago, Chicago (H.A.); Fuwai Hospital and Cardiovascular Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, and China National Center for Cardiovascular Disease — both in Beijing (D.G.); Screening Group, Prevention and Early Detection Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (C.S.), and the International Prevention Research Institute (P.B.) — both in Lyon, France; the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore (W.-P.K.); and the Department of Environmental Medicine, New York University School of Medicine (Y.C.), and the Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (P.B.) — both in New York.

References

References

  1. 1

    Abelson P, Kennedy D. The obesity epidemic. Science 2004;304:1413-1413
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lancet 2005;366:1197-1209
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157-163[Erratum, Lancet 2004;363:902.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Brockwell SE, Gordon IR. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis. Stat Med 2001;20:825-840
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188
    CrossRef | Medline

  6. 6

    Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet 2009;373:1083-1096
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Flegal KM, Graubard BI, Williamson DF, Gail MH. Excess deaths associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity. JAMA 2005;293:1861-1867
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Gu D, He J, Duan X, et al. Body weight and mortality among men and women in China. JAMA 2006;295:776-783
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Jee SH, Sull JW, Park J, et al. Body-mass index and mortality in Korean men and women. N Engl J Med 2006;355:779-787
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Pischon T, Boeing H, Hoffmann K, et al. General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2105-2120[Erratum, N Engl J Med 2010;362:2433.]
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Willett WC, Dietz WH, Colditz GA. Guidelines for healthy weight. N Engl J Med 1999;341:427-434
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Lewis CE, McTigue KM, Burke LE, et al. Mortality, health outcomes, and body mass index in the overweight range: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2009;119:3263-3271
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Manson JE, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, et al. Body weight and mortality among women. N Engl J Med 1995;333:677-685
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Rodriguez C, Heath CW Jr. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1097-1105
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB, et al. Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med 2006;355:763-778
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Zhang X, Shu XO, Chow WH, et al. Body mass index at various ages and mortality in Chinese women: impact of potential methodological biases. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008;32:1130-1136
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Van Gaal LF, Mertens IL, De Block CE. Mechanisms linking obesity with cardiovascular disease. Nature 2006;444:875-880
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Manson JE, Bassuk SS, Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Estimating the number of deaths due to obesity: can the divergent findings be reconciled? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2007;16:168-176
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Lopez-Jimenez F. Speakable and unspeakable facts about BMI and mortality. Lancet 2009;373:1055-1056
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Zhang X, Shu XO, Yang G, et al. Abdominal adiposity and mortality in Chinese women. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:886-892
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Allison DB, Faith MS, Heo M, Kotler DP. Hypothesis concerning the U-shaped relation between body mass index and mortality. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:339-349
    Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (24)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Shoichiro Tsugane. (2012) Alcohol, smoking, and obesity epidemiology in Japan. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 27, 121-126
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Kazunori Kasama, Wilfred Mui, Wei Jei Lee, Muffazal Lakdawala, Takeshi Naitoh, Yosuke Seki, Akira Sasaki, Go Wakabayashi, Iwao Sasaki, Isao Kawamura, Lilian Kow, Harry Frydenberg, Anton Chen, Mahendra Narwaria, Pradeep Chowbey. (2012) IFSO-APC Consensus Statements 2011. Obesity Surgery
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Hyun Hwan Sung, Seong Soo Jeon, Seo Yong Park, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Hyun Moo Lee, Han-Yong Choi. (2012) Impact of body mass index in Korean patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Causes & Control
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    X.-M. Mai, Y. Chen, C. A. Camargo, A. Langhammer. (2012) Cross-Sectional and Prospective Cohort Study of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Level and Obesity in Adults: The HUNT Study. American Journal of Epidemiology
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    H. Nair, X.-O. Shu, J. Volmink, I. Romieu, D. Spiegelman. (2012) Cohort studies around the world: Methodologies, research questions and integration to address the emerging global epidemic of chronic diseases. Public Health
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Z. Chen, G. Yang, A. Offer, M. Zhou, M. Smith, R. Peto, H. Ge, L. Yang, G. Whitlock. (2012) Body mass index and mortality in China: a 15-year prospective study of 220 000 men. International Journal of Epidemiology
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    A. J. Cameron, D. J. Magliano, J. E. Shaw, P. Z. Zimmet, B. Carstensen, K. G. M. Alberti, J. Tuomilehto, E. L. M. Barr, V. K. Pauvaday, S. Kowlessur, S. Soderberg. (2012) The influence of hip circumference on the relationship between abdominal obesity and mortality. International Journal of Epidemiology
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Anand Vaidya, Jonathan S. Williams, John P. Forman. (2012) The Independent Association Between 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and Adiponectin and Its Relation With BMI in Two Large Cohorts: The NHS and the HPFS. Obesity 20:1, 186-191
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Jin Suk Chang, Yong Hyun Park, Ja Hyun Ku, Cheol Kwak, Hyeon Hoe Kim. (2012) Predicting Factors for Death from Other Causes in Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma. Korean Journal of Urology 53:1, 18
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Marilyn L. Kwan, Wendy Y. Chen, Candyce H. Kroenke, Erin K. Weltzien, Jeannette M. Beasley, Sarah J. Nechuta, Elizabeth M. Poole, Wei Lu, Michelle D. Holmes, Charles P. Quesenberry, John P. Pierce, Xiao Ou Shu, Bette J. Caan. (2011) Pre-diagnosis body mass index and survival after breast cancer in the After Breast Cancer Pooling Project. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    P. Boffetta, W. D. Hazelton, Y. Chen, R. Sinha, M. Inoue, Y. T. Gao, W. P. Koh, X. O. Shu, E. J. Grant, I. Tsuji, Y. Nishino, S. L. You, K. Y. Yoo, J. M. Yuan, J. Kim, S. Tsugane, G. Yang, R. Wang, Y. B. Xiang, K. Ozasa, M. Nagai, M. Kakizaki, C. J. Chen, S. K. Park, A. Shin, H. Ahsan, C. X. Qu, J. E. Lee, M. Thornquist, B. Rolland, Z. Feng, W. Zheng, J. D. Potter. (2011) Body mass, tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking and risk of cancer of the small intestine--a pooled analysis of over 500 000 subjects in the Asia Cohort Consortium. Annals of Oncology
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    X. He, F. J. Esteva, J. Ensor, G. N. Hortobagyi, M.- H. Lee, S.- C. J. Yeung. (2011) Metformin and thiazolidinediones are associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival of diabetic women with HER2+ breast cancer. Annals of Oncology
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Jeonghyun Kang, Song-Ee Baek, Taehyung Kim, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Joon Seok Lim, Nam Kyu Kim, Kang Young Lee. (2011) Impact of fat obesity on laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: more reliable indicator than body mass index. International Journal of Colorectal Disease
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    M. Inoue, N. Sawada, T. Matsuda, M. Iwasaki, S. Sasazuki, T. Shimazu, K. Shibuya, S. Tsugane. (2011) Attributable causes of cancer in Japan in 2005--systematic assessment to estimate current burden of cancer attributable to known preventable risk factors in Japan. Annals of Oncology
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Anura V. Kurpad, Kiruba S. Varadharajan, Isabelle Aeberli. (2011) The thin-fat phenotype and global metabolic disease risk. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 14:6, 542-547
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Ajay Chawla, Khoa D. Nguyen, Y. P. Sharon Goh. (2011) Macrophage-mediated inflammation in metabolic disease. Nature Reviews Immunology 11:11, 738-749
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Amir H. Sam, Rachel C. Troke, Tricia M. Tan, Gavin A. Bewick. (2011) The role of the gut/brain axis in modulating food intake. Neuropharmacology
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Boggs, Deborah A., Rosenberg, Lynn, Cozier, Yvette C., Wise, Lauren A., Coogan, Patricia F., Ruiz-Narvaez, Edward A., Palmer, Julie R., . (2011) General and Abdominal Obesity and Risk of Death among Black Women. New England Journal of Medicine 365:10, 901-908
    Full Text

  19. 19

    Marie T. Cooney, Helen C. Cooney, Alexandra Dudina, Ian M. Graham. (2011) Total cardiovascular disease risk assessment. Current Opinion in Cardiology 26:5, 429-437
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    (2011) Body-Mass Index and Risk of Death in Asians. New England Journal of Medicine 364:22, 2165-2166
    Full Text

  21. 21

    Rexford S. Ahima. (2011) Digging deeper into obesity. Journal of Clinical Investigation 121:6, 2076-2079
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Soo Lim, Hyung Jin Choi, Hayley Shin, Ah Reum Khang, Seon Mee Kang, Ji Won Yoon, Sung Hee Choi, In Kyong Jeong, Sung Il Cho, Kyong Soo Park, Hak Chul Jang. (2011) Subclinical atherosclerosis in a community-based elderly cohort: The Korean Longitudinal Study on Health and Aging. International Journal of Cardiology
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Peter Manu, Constantin Ionescu-Tirgoviste, James Tsang, Barbara A. Napolitano, Martin L. Lesser, Christoph U. Correll. (2011) Dysmetabolic signals in “metabolically healthy” obesity. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Shizuka Sasazuki, Manami Inoue, Ichiro Tsuji, Yumi Sugawara, Akiko Tamakoshi, Keitaro Matsuo, Kenji Wakai, Chisato Nagata, Keitaro Tanaka, Tetsuya Mizoue, Shoichiro Tsugane. (2011) Body Mass Index and Mortality From All Causes and Major Causes in Japanese: Results of a Pooled Analysis of 7 Large-Scale Cohort Studies. Journal of Epidemiology 21:6, 417-430
    CrossRef

Letters