Original Article
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Treatment for Acute Otitis Media
N Engl J Med 2011; 364:116-126January 13, 2011
Comments
open through January 18, 2011
- Abstract
Background
The efficacy of antimicrobial treatment in children with acute otitis media remains controversial.
Methods
In this randomized, double-blind trial, children 6 to 35 months of age with acute otitis media, diagnosed with the use of strict criteria, received amoxicillin–clavulanate (161 children) or placebo (158 children) for 7 days. The primary outcome was the time to treatment failure from the first dose until the end-of-treatment visit on day 8. The definition of treatment failure was based on the overall condition of the child (including adverse events) and otoscopic signs of acute otitis media.
Results
Treatment failure occurred in 18.6% of the children who received amoxicillin–clavulanate, as compared with 44.9% of the children who received placebo (P<0.001). The difference between the groups was already apparent at the first scheduled visit (day 3), at which time 13.7% of the children who received amoxicillin–clavulanate, as compared with 25.3% of those who received placebo, had treatment failure. Overall, amoxicillin–clavulanate reduced the progression to treatment failure by 62% (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.59; P<0.001) and the need for rescue treatment by 81% (6.8% vs. 33.5%; hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.36; P<0.001). Analgesic or antipyretic agents were given to 84.2% and 85.9% of the children in the amoxicillin–clavulanate and placebo groups, respectively. Adverse events were significantly more common in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group than in the placebo group. A total of 47.8% of the children in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group had diarrhea, as compared with 26.6% in the placebo group (P<0.001); 8.7% and 3.2% of the children in the respective groups had eczema (P=0.04).
Conclusions
Children with acute otitis media benefit from antimicrobial treatment as compared with placebo, although they have more side effects. Future studies should identify patients who may derive the greatest benefit, in order to minimize unnecessary antimicrobial treatment and the development of bacterial resistance. (Funded by the Foundation for Paediatric Research and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00299455.)
Media in This Article
Video
Otoscopic Signs of the Course of Acute Otitis Media.
Figure 1
Enrollment, Randomization, and Follow-up of the Study Patients.Article Activity
- Article
Video
Otoscopic Signs of the Course of Acute Otitis Media.
Acute otitis media is the most common bacterial infection during early childhood.1 Antimicrobial agents have been the primary treatment for this infection since the 1950s, when the first studies showed that antimicrobial therapy improved the outcome.2,3 Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the optimal management of acute otitis media.1 Because the treatment of acute otitis media is a major reason for the use of antimicrobial agents in the outpatient setting, experts have called for these agents to be used judiciously.4,5 Several guidelines for the management of acute otitis media recommend an observation period before antimicrobial therapy is even considered.6-10 These recommendations are based largely on meta-analyses that concluded that for 1 child to have relief of symptoms, 7 to 17 children must be treated with antimicrobial agents.11-15 However, some experts have suggested that the original studies included in the meta-analyses had important limitations, such as biases in patient selection, varying diagnostic criteria, and suboptimal spectrum or dosage of antimicrobial agents.1,16-20
We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy in the age group with the highest incidence of acute otitis media. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media when strict diagnostic criteria are used and the antimicrobial coverage and dosage of the active treatment are adequate.
Methods
Patients and Diagnostic Criteria
Children 6 to 35 months of age with acute symptoms were eligible for our diagnostic screening. A list of the exclusion criteria, along with descriptions and explanations, is provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org. Children in whom acute otitis media was diagnosed per protocol were eligible for inclusion in the study. Three overall criteria were required for the diagnosis of acute otitis media (see videos 1, 2, and 3). First, middle-ear fluid had to be detected by means of pneumatic otoscopic examination that showed at least two of the following tympanic-membrane findings: bulging position, decreased or absent mobility, abnormal color or opacity not due to scarring, or air–fluid interfaces. Second, at least one of the following acute inflammatory signs in the tympanic membrane had to be present: distinct erythematous patches or streaks or increased vascularity over full, bulging, or yellow tympanic membrane. Third, the child had to have acute symptoms, such as fever, ear pain, or respiratory symptoms. A parent of each child provided written informed consent. The protocol, which is available at NEJM.org, was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital District of Southwest Finland. The authors vouch for the accuracy and completeness of the reported data and the fidelity of this report to the study protocol.
Study Design
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that was initiated by the investigators and was conducted independently of any commercial entities. Our objective was to study the efficacy of antimicrobial treatment with respect to the resolution of symptoms and signs of acute otitis media. The hypothesis was that amoxicillin–clavulanate would reduce the risk of treatment failure.
At the enrollment visit (day 1), the patient's symptoms, medical history, and demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, a nasopharyngeal sample was obtained, and a clinical examination was performed that included thorough otoscopic and tympanometric examinations. Details of nasopharyngeal sampling, bacterial culturing, analyses of resistance of the bacteria to antimicrobial agents, and otoscopic examinations are provided in the Supplementary Appendix.
Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive amoxicillin–clavulanate (40 mg of amoxicillin per kilogram of body weight per day plus 5.7 mg of clavulanate per kilogram per day, divided into two daily doses) or placebo for 7 days. The placebo was similar to the active treatment in appearance and taste. (For a description of the study drugs, the randomization procedure, and the procedure for concealment of study assignments, see the Supplementary Appendix.) Parents were given a diary and were asked to record symptoms, doses of study drugs and any other medications, absenteeism of the child from day care and of the parent from work, and adverse events. Fever was defined as a body temperature of 38°C or higher. We encouraged the use of analgesic and antipyretic agents and allowed the use of analgesic ear drops and decongestant nose drops or sprays.
The first visit after the enrollment visit was scheduled for 2 days after the initiation of the study drug (day 3). The end-of-treatment visit was scheduled for the day after the last dose of study drug was administered (i.e., on day 8). At that visit, diaries and used and unused study-drug capsules were returned, and adherence to the study drug was estimated. Parents were told to contact a study physician whenever they thought that their child's condition had not improved satisfactorily or had worsened; an additional visit was arranged on any day of the week. Whenever possible, the same study physician examined the patient at consecutive visits. At each visit, the study physician first asked the parents for their assessment of their child's overall condition, which was recorded as healthy, better, no improvement, or worse. The child was then examined by the physician. At any visit, the physician could switch from the study drug to rescue treatment if the child's overall condition or otoscopic signs warranted the change (see the Supplementary Appendix). Parents were encouraged to keep their children in the study for follow-up assessments even if they had discontinued the study drug.
Outcomes
The primary outcome was the time to treatment failure, which was a composite outcome consisting of six independent components: no improvement in overall condition by the first scheduled visit (day 3) (i.e., unless parents thought that their child's overall condition was improving, the case was categorized as treatment failure), a worsening of the child's overall condition at any time, no improvement in otoscopic signs by the end-of-treatment visit on day 8 (see videos 4 through 8), perforation of the tympanic membrane at any time, severe infection (e.g., mastoiditis or pneumonia) necessitating systemic open-label antimicrobial treatment at any time, and any other reason for stopping the study drug (e.g., an adverse event or nonadherence to the study drug) at any time. The time of treatment failure was the study day on which the study physician confirmed any one of the components for the first time. Several components could be confirmed concurrently, but this was not a requirement. The first two components were based on the parents' assessment of their child's overall condition, including adverse events (healthy, better, no improvement, or worse) as reported to the study physician; the other four components were assessed by the study physician.
The secondary outcomes, which were assessed by the study physician, were the time to the initiation of rescue treatment and the development of contralateral acute otitis media. Data on the use of analgesic or antipyretic agents, absenteeism of the child from day care and of the parent from work, and the resolution of each symptom were based on recordings in the diary. The treatment result, as of the end-of-treatment visit, was based on the parents' assessment of the child's overall condition as reported to the study physician and on the otoscopic signs. Adverse events were ascertained from entries by the parents in the diary and from reports by the study physicians after they questioned the parents.
Statistical Analysis
We estimated that with 260 patients, the study would have 90% power to detect an absolute reduction of 15 percentage points in the rate of treatment failure in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group as compared with the placebo group, assuming a 25% rate of treatment failure in the placebo group, with a type I error of 0.05. We planned to enroll 320 patients to account for a possible 20% rate of withdrawal from the study.
The Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze time-to-event data with the use of the log-rank test; hazard ratios and confidence intervals were calculated on the basis of a Cox regression model. Categorical outcomes were compared with the use of the chi-square test. Student's t-test was used to compare means. Absolute percentage-point differences in rates and 95% confidence intervals are provided.
All analyses were performed on data from the intention-to-treat population. All reported P values are two-sided and have not been adjusted for multiple testing. All analyses were performed with the use of SPSS software, version 16.0.
Results
Study Patients
The intention-to-treat population comprised 319 patients — 161 in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and 158 in the placebo group (Figure 1Figure 1
Enrollment, Randomization, and Follow-up of the Study Patients. and Table 1Table 1
Selected Baseline Characteristics of the Intention-to-Treat Population.). The rate of adherence to the study drug was approximately 94% as assessed according to diary entries and approximately 99% as assessed according to the amount of returned study drugs, with no significant differences between the groups.Primary Outcome
Treatment failure occurred in 30 of the 161 children (18.6%) who received amoxicillin–clavulanate and in 71 of the 158 children (44.9%) who received placebo (P<0.001). The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that a separation between the curves for the two groups was already apparent at the first scheduled visit, on day 3 (Figure 2AFigure 2
Kaplan–Meier Curves for the Time to Treatment Failure and Rescue Treatment.). At that time, 13.7% of the children in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and 25.3% in the placebo group had treatment failure. The separation between the curves continued to widen during the subsequent follow-up and peaked at the end-of-treatment visit on day 8. Overall, amoxicillin–clavulanate reduced the risk of treatment failure by 62% (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.59; P<0.001). To avoid treatment failure in 1 child, 3.8 children (95% CI, 2.7 to 6.2) needed to be treated with amoxicillin–clavulanate. Each of the six components of the primary outcome occurred less often in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group than in the placebo group (Figure 3Figure 3
Absolute Differences between the Amoxicillin–Clavulanate and Placebo Groups in Cumulative Rates of Primary and Secondary Outcomes.). The determination of treatment failure was based on overall condition in 27 children in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and 48 in the placebo group; on overall condition and otoscopic signs in 0 and 6 children in the two groups, respectively; on otoscopic signs in 2 and 15 children, respectively; and on any reason to stop the study drug in 1 and 2 children, respectively (Table 2 in the Supplementary Appendix). In a subgroup analysis, the treatment effect was similar in children with unilateral acute otitis media and in those with bilateral acute otitis media (Table 3 in the Supplementary Appendix).Secondary Outcomes
Rescue treatment was initiated in 11 of the 30 children in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group (36.7%) and in 53 of the 71 children in the placebo group (74.6%) who had treatment failure (P<0.001). The need for rescue treatment was decreased by 81% with amoxicillin–clavulanate as compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.36; P<0.001) (Figure 2B). Thus, rescue treatment was required in the case of 6.8% and 33.5% of all the children in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and placebo group, respectively (Figure 3, and Table 2 in the Supplementary Appendix).
Contralateral acute otitis media developed in 13 of the 159 children in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group (8.2%) and 29 of the 156 children in the placebo group (18.6%) for whom data were available (P=0.007) (Figure 3). There was no significant between-group difference in the use of analgesic or antipyretic agents (Figure 3). Among the children who received analgesic or antipyretic agents, the mean duration of treatment was 3.6 days and 3.4 days in the amoxicillin–clavulanate and placebo groups, respectively (P=0.45). Absenteeism from day care was reported for 107 of 672 follow-up days (15.9%) among day-care attendees in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and for 144 of 568 follow-up days (25.4%) among day-care attendees in the placebo group (a reduction of 9.4 percentage points with amoxicillin–clavulanate; 95% CI, −13.9 to −4.9; P<0.001). Parents of day-care attendees in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group missed significantly fewer workdays than did parents of day-care attendees in the placebo group (81 days [12.1%] vs. 101 days [17.8%], a reduction of 5.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −9.7 to −1.8; P=0.005).
At the end-of-treatment visit, there was a significantly better treatment result with respect to both overall condition and otoscopic signs with amoxicillin–clavulanate than with placebo (P<0.001 for both outcomes) (Figure 4Figure 4
Child's Overall Condition and Otoscopic Signs at the End of Treatment.). Overall condition had not improved or had worsened in 11 children (6.8%) in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group, as compared with 47 children (29.7%) in the placebo group (22.9 percentage points less with amoxicillin–clavulanate; 95% CI, −31.4 to −14.4). Otoscopic signs had not improved or had worsened in 8 children (5.0%) and 60 children (38.0%) in the amoxicillin–clavulanate and placebo groups, respectively (a decrease of 33.0 percentage points with amoxicillin–clavulanate; 95% CI, −42.0 to −24.0). In 1 child (0.6%) in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and 10 children (6.3%) in the placebo group, both overall condition and otoscopic signs had worsened (a decrease of 5.7 percentage points with amoxicillin–clavulanate; 95% CI, −9.7 to −1.7), whereas 13 children (8.1%) in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and 4 (2.5%) in the placebo group were completely healthy with respect to overall condition and otoscopic signs (an increase of 5.5 percentage points with amoxicillin–clavulanate; 95% CI, 0.6 to 10.5).Treatment with amoxicillin–clavulanate significantly accelerated the resolution of fever, poor appetite, decreased activity, and irritability. The effect of treatment on the resolution of fever was already seen 6 hours after the first dose had been administered, and the effect on the resolution of the symptoms of poor appetite, decreased activity, and irritability was seen on the second study day. There was no significant effect of amoxicillin–clavulanate on the resolution of ear pain as reported by parents, ear pain as reported by the children, ear rubbing, restless sleep, or excessive crying (Figure 2 in the Supplementary Appendix).
After the end of the study-treatment period, children who had received amoxicillin–clavulanate had less pathogenic bacteria in the nasopharynx than did children who had received placebo (Table 4 in the Supplementary Appendix). However, antimicrobial resistance was identified from the nasopharyngeal samples of one child in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group. On study days 1 and 8, we detected an isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae that first showed intermediate resistance and later showed full resistance to penicillin.
Adverse Events
An adverse event occurred in 85 children (52.8%) in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and in 57 children (36.1%) in the placebo group (an increase of 16.7 percentage points with amoxicillin–clavulanate; 95% CI, 5.8 to 27.6; P=0.003) (Table 2Table 2
Adverse Events.). There were no cases of mastoiditis. Two children in the placebo group had severe infection — one had pneumococcal bacteremia and the other had radiographically confirmed pneumonia. The most common adverse event was diarrhea, which affected 77 children (47.8%) in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and 42 (26.6%) in the placebo group (an increase of 21.2 percentage points with amoxicillin–clavulanate; 95% CI, 10.6 to 31.9). No watery or bloody diarrhea was reported, and diarrhea did not result in discontinuation of the study drug. Eczema was significantly more common in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group than in the placebo group. Children with severe infections and perforations of the tympanic membrane were given rescue treatment. All other adverse events resolved spontaneously by the end-of-treatment visit (day 8), except in three children with diarrhea in each group and in one child in the placebo group in whom exanthema developed on day 8 and lasted for 4 days.Discussion
Our study shows that amoxicillin–clavulanate is superior to placebo for the treatment of acute otitis media. The primary outcome, the time to treatment failure, incorporated six independent components, including acute symptoms and otoscopic signs that are required for the diagnosis of acute otitis media. Moreover, our composite outcome measured the net effect of the treatment, because the assessment of the child's overall condition included adverse events. This study was not powered to assess the effect of treatment on each component of the composite primary outcome. Nonetheless, amoxicillin–clavulanate significantly reduced two components — worsening of the child's overall condition and lack of improvement in otoscopic signs — as well as the combined occurrence of perforations of the tympanic membrane and severe infections.
Antimicrobial treatment had a more beneficial effect on acute otitis media in our study than in previous randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.21-30 Previous studies have shown that the higher the failure rate is in the placebo group, the more antimicrobial treatment is shown to be superior. In a study by Kaleida et al.,26 failure rates in the placebo group were 8% among patients who were not severely ill and 24% among those who were severely ill, and the respective absolute differences in failure rates between the antimicrobial-therapy group and the placebo group were 4 percentage points and 12 percentage points, respectively. In the placebo group in our study, the failure rate was even higher — 44.9%, with a 26-percentage-point difference between the groups. The number needed to treat for 1 child to benefit from antimicrobial therapy, as calculated on the basis of the results of our study, is 3.8, as compared with 7 to 17 on the basis of the meta-analyses.11-15,31,32 A marked difference between the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and the placebo group was also seen in the need for rescue treatment. Rescue treatment was initiated in the children receiving antimicrobial therapy in our study approximately as often as in previous studies.21,24,26-30 In contrast, a third of the children in the placebo group in our study needed rescue treatment, as compared with an average of 12% in other studies. Our decision to provide rescue treatment for children who had improvement in overall condition but no improvement in otoscopic signs can be criticized. Nonetheless, these children still had clinically manifest acute otitis media after a 1-week observation period. Even when these children were excluded from the analysis, children in the placebo group needed rescue treatment significantly more often than did those in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group. The greater beneficial effect of antimicrobial therapy in our study than in previous studies results primarily from methodologic differences. Only children who met stringent diagnostic criteria for acute otitis media were included in our study, and we did not exclude patients according to the severity of symptoms or otoscopic signs. In addition, we used an active treatment with adequate dosage and antimicrobial coverage.
The resolution of several symptoms was accelerated with amoxicillin–clavulanate therapy, as compared with placebo. This was an unexpected finding, since most patients in both groups received analgesic or antipyretic agents, and it has been emphasized that symptoms often resolve spontaneously.33,34 Furthermore, although bacteria can virtually always be found in the middle ear during an episode of acute otitis media,35,36 the symptoms are not specific to acute otitis media but instead resemble those that are manifested during viral-type respiratory infections.37 Since we analyzed the treatment effect on symptoms with a time-to-event approach, as suggested by some experts,38,39 we were able to observe that the effect of amoxicillin–clavulanate became apparent early. The earliest treatment effect was seen with respect to the resolution of fever. The rapid resolution of fever during the first day of antimicrobial treatment is well documented in the case of childhood pneumonia.40,41 In the current study, the effect of the treatment on other symptoms was seen on the second study day. From the third study day onward, rescue treatment was initiated significantly more often in children in the placebo group than in those in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group. As highlighted by Mygind et al., assessment of the treatment effect on symptoms should take into account the need for rescue treatment for the most symptomatic patients.22 Despite the tendency for symptoms to resolve spontaneously, which was also seen in our study, our results challenge the view that antimicrobial treatment of acute otitis media should be withheld to see whether symptoms will resolve without such treatment.
Since no symptom is specific to acute otitis media in children of preverbal age, it is also important to examine the treatment effect on the site of the infection itself — namely, the middle ear. At the end of treatment, otoscopic signs had not improved or had worsened in 5.0% and 38.0% of children in the amoxicillin–clavulanate and placebo groups, respectively. Whether these children were at risk for the persistent presence of fluid in the middle ear is a question for further research. The results of this study are consistent with the results of our previous study of acute otitis media with tympanostomy-tube otorrhea, which showed that antimicrobial treatment rapidly ameliorated the infection in the middle ear.42
From a different perspective, our results can also be interpreted as showing that half the children in the placebo group did not have treatment failure and two thirds did not need rescue treatment. These findings suggest that not all patients with acute otitis media need antimicrobial treatment. It will be important in the future to characterize patients who do not need antimicrobial treatment. The identification of prognostic markers, together with the use of stringent diagnostic criteria, could reduce the use of antimicrobial agents in the treatment of acute otitis media.14,43 Reduced use of antimicrobial agents may limit the development of resistant bacteria and increase the chances that the subsequent use of antimicrobial agents, when truly indicated, would be beneficial.
In conclusion, our study provides evidence that in children 6 to 35 months of age, the treatment of acute otitis media with an antimicrobial agent that gives adequate coverage — such as amoxicillin–clavulanate — is beneficial. Antimicrobial treatment reduces the risk of treatment failure by improving both overall condition and otoscopic signs.
Supported by the Fellowship Award of the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases (to Dr. Ruohola) and by grants from the Foundation for Paediatric Research; Research Funds from Specified Government Transfers; the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation; the Paulo Foundation; the Maud Kuistila Memorial Foundation; the Emil Aaltonen Foundation; the Finnish Cultural Foundation, Varsinais-Suomi Regional Fund; the Turku University Hospital Research Foundation; and the Finnish–Norwegian Medical Foundation.
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.
We thank all the families who participated in this study and the staff at the health center of Turku and at the pediatric infectious disease ward at Turku University Hospital for their commitment to the study; Raakel Luoto, M.D., Ph.D., and Elina Lahti, M.D., Ph.D., for their help with data collection; study nurses Sari Rajamäki, R.N., Maarit Rosenblad, R.N., and Kaisa Erkkilä, R.N., for their assistance in the study clinic; Laura Lindholm, M.Sc., for her assistance with bacterial analyses; Maria Ruohola and Ulla Torkko for assistance with data handling; Tero Vahlberg, M.Sc., for his assistance with statistical analyses; Cris Patricoski, M.D., for his advice regarding video otoscopy equipment; and Tuomo Puhakka, M.D., Ph.D., for assessing digital images and videos of tympanic-membrane findings in the study patients.
Source Information
From the Department of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital (P.A.T., M.K.L., O.R., A.R.), the Division of Health Protection, National Institute for Health and Welfare (P.H., J.J.), and the Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Turku (P.H.) — all in Turku, Finland.
Address reprint requests to Dr. Ruohola at the Department of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital, PL 52 FIN-20521, Turku, Finland, or at aino.ruohola@utu.fi.
- References
References
1
Vergison A ,Dagan R ,Arguedas A , et al. Otitis media and its consequences: beyond the earache. Lancet Infect Dis 2010;10:195-203
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline2
Lahikainen E . Clinico-bacteriologic studies on acute otitis media: aspiration of tympanum as diagnostic and therapeutic method. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1953;107:1-82
CrossRef3
Rudberg RD . Acute otitis media: comparative therapeutic results of sulphonamide and penicillin administered in various forms. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1954;113:1-79
Medline4
Dowell SF ,Marcy SM ,Phillips WR ,Gerber MA ,Schwartz B . Otitis media -- principles of judicious use of antimicrobial agents. Pediatrics 1998;101:Suppl:165-171
Web of Science5
Rautakorpi UM ,Klaukka T ,Honkanen P , et al. Antibiotic use by indication: a basis for active antibiotic policy in the community. Scand J Infect Dis 2001;33:920-926
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline6
Appelman CL ,van Balen FA ,van de Lisdonk EH ,van Weert HC ,Eizenga WH . NHG Practice Guideline: acute otitis media. Huisarts Wet 1990;33:242-245http://www.artsennet.nl/Richtlijnen/Richtlijn/Otitis-media-acuta-bij-kinderen-2.htm7
Bain J, Townsley P, Boyle K, et al. Diagnosis and management of childhood otitis media in primary care: guideline no. 66. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2003.
8
American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Management of Acute Otitis Media
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline9
Forgie S ,Zhanel G ,Robinson J . Management of acute otitis media. Paediatr Child Health 2009;14:457-464
Web of Science10
Marchisio P ,Bellussi L ,Di Mauro G , et al. Acute otitis media: from diagnosis to prevention -- summary of the Italian guideline. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74:1209-1216
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline11
Rosenfeld RM ,Vertrees JE ,Carr J , et al. Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial drugs for acute otitis media: metaanalysis of 5400 children from thirty-three randomized trials. J Pediatr 1994;124:355-367
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline12
Del Mar C ,Glasziou P ,Hayem M . Are antibiotics indicated as initial treatment for children with acute otitis media? A meta-analysis. BMJ 1997;314:1526-1529
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline13
Marcy M ,Takata G ,Chan LS , et al. Management of acute otitis media. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2000;15:1-4
Medline14
Rovers MM ,Glasziou P ,Appelman CL , et al. Antibiotics for acute otitis media: a meta-analysis with individual patient data. Lancet 2006;368:1429-1435
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline15
Sanders S ,Glasziou PP ,Del Mar C ,Rovers MM . Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;1:CD000219-CD00021916
Bain J . Treatment of acute otitis media: are children entered into clinical trials representative? Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:132-133
Web of Science | Medline17
Dagan R ,McCracken GH Jr . Flaws in design and conduct of clinical trials in acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:894-902
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline18
Marchant CD . Acute otitis media, antibiotics, children and clinical trial design. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:891-893
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline19
Pichichero ME ,Casey JR . Diagnostic inaccuracy and subject exclusions render placebo and observational studies of acute otitis media inconclusive. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008;27:958-962
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline20
Pichichero ME ,Casey JR . Comparison of study designs for acute otitis media trials. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008;72:737-750
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline21
Halsted C ,Lepow ML ,Balassanian N ,Emmerich J ,Wolinsky E . Otitis media: clinical observations, microbiology, and evaluation of therapy. Am J Dis Child 1968;115:542-551
Web of Science | Medline22
Mygind N ,Meistrup-Larsen KI ,Thomsen J ,Thomsen VF ,Josefsson K ,Sorensen H . Penicillin in acute otitis media: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Clin Otolaryngol 1981;6:5-13
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline23
van Buchem FL ,Dunk JH ,van't Hof MA . Therapy of acute otitis media: myringotomy, antibiotics, or neither? A double-blind study in children. Lancet 1981;2:883-887
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline24
Thalin A, Densert O, Larsson A, Lyden E, Ripa T. Is penicillin necessary in the treatment of acute otitis media? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Acute and Secretory Otitis Media, Part 1, Jerusalem, Israel, November 17–22, 1985:441-6.
25
Engelhard D ,Cohen D ,Strauss N ,Sacks TG ,Jorczak-Sarni L ,Shapiro M . Randomised study of myringotomy, amoxycillin/clavulanate, or both for acute otitis media in infants. Lancet 1989;2:141-143
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline26
Kaleida PH ,Casselbrant ML ,Rockette HE , et al. Amoxicillin or myringotomy or both for acute otitis media: results of a randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics 1991;87:466-474
Web of Science | Medline27
Burke P ,Bain J ,Robinson D ,Dunleavey J . Acute red ear in children: controlled trial of non-antibiotic treatment in general practice. BMJ 1991;303:558-562
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline28
Appelman CL ,Claessen JQ ,Touw-Otten FW ,Hordijk GJ ,de Melker RA . Co-amoxiclav in recurrent acute otitis media: placebo controlled study. BMJ 1991;303:1450-1452
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline29
Damoiseaux RA ,van Balen FA ,Hoes AW ,Verheij TJ ,de Melker RA . Primary care based randomised, double blind trial of amoxicillin versus placebo for acute otitis media in children aged under 2 years. BMJ 2000;320:350-354
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline30
Le Saux N ,Gaboury I ,Baird M , et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority trial of amoxicillin for clinically diagnosed acute otitis media in children 6 months to 5 years of age. CMAJ 2005;172:335-341
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline31
Vouloumanou EK ,Karageorgopoulos DE ,Kazantzi MS ,Kapaskelis AM ,Falagas ME . Antibiotics versus placebo or watchful waiting for acute otitis media: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009;64:16-24
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline32
Coker TR ,Chan LS ,Newberry SJ , et al. Diagnosis, microbial epidemiology, and antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media in children: a systematic review. JAMA 2010;304:2161-2169
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline33
Hendley JO . Otitis media. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1169-1174
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline34
Rovers MM ,Schilder AG ,Zielhuis GA ,Rosenfeld RM . Otitis media. Lancet 2004;363:465-473[Erratum, Lancet 2004;363:1080.]
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline35
Del Beccaro MA ,Mendelman PM ,Inglis AF , et al. Bacteriology of acute otitis media: a new perspective. J Pediatr 1992;120:81-84
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline36
Ruohola A ,Meurman O ,Nikkari S , et al. Microbiology of acute otitis media in children with tympanostomy tubes: prevalences of bacteria and viruses. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:1417-1422
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline37
Laine MK ,Tahtinen PA ,Ruuskanen O ,Huovinen P ,Ruohola A . Symptoms or symptom-based scores cannot predict acute otitis media at otitis-prone age. Pediatrics 2010;125:e1154-e1161
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline38
Johann-Liang R ,Zalkikar J ,Powers JH . Correlation between bacteriologic and clinical endpoints in trials of acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22:936-937
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline39
Schaad UB . Correlation between bacteriologic eradication and clinical cure in acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:281-282
Web of Science | Medline40
Toikka P ,Virkki R ,Mertsola J ,Ashorn P ,Eskola J ,Ruuskanen O . Bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia in children. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:568-572
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline41
Juven T ,Mertsola J ,Waris M ,Leinonen M ,Ruuskanen O . Clinical response to antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Eur J Pediatr 2004;163:140-144
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline42
Ruohola A ,Heikkinen T ,Meurman O ,Puhakka T ,Lindblad N ,Ruuskanen O . Antibiotic treatment of acute otorrhea through tympanostomy tube: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with daily follow-up. Pediatrics 2003;111:1061-1067
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline43
Shaikh N ,Hoberman A ,Kaleida PH ,Ploof DL ,Paradise JL . Diagnosing otitis media -- otoscopy and cerumen removal. N Engl J Med 2010;362:e62-e62
Full Text | Medline
- Citing Articles (16)
Citing Articles
1
Abbas A. Anwar, Anil K. Lalwani. (2012) Should antibiotics be prescribed for acute otitis media?. The Laryngoscope 122:1, 4-5
CrossRef2
Adela Kolumbić Lakoš, Ana Pangerčić, Maja Gašparić, Mirjana Matrapazovski Kukuruzović, Dražen Kovačić, Bruno Baršić. (2012) Safety and effectiveness of azithromycin in the treatment of respiratory infections in children. Current Medical Research and Opinion 28:1, 155-162
CrossRef3
William T. Gerson. (2011) Commentary. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care 41:10, 284-285
CrossRef4
Sherman J. Alter, Navjyot K. Vidwan, Patrick O. Sobande, Abiodun Omoloja, Jeffrey S. Bennett. (2011) Common Childhood Bacterial Infections. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care 41:10, 256-283
CrossRef5
Ana Lucia Andrade, Cristiana M. Toscano, Ruth Minamisava, Paulo Sucasas Costa, João Guimarães Andrade. (2011) Pneumococcal disease manifestation in children before and after vaccination: What's new?. Vaccine 29, C2-C14
CrossRef6
Jerome O. Klein. (2011) Children under 2 years of age with acute otitis media benefit from antibiotic treatment. The Journal of Pediatrics 159:3, 514-515
CrossRef7
R. Cohen, E. Bingen, C. Levy, M. Benani, F. Thollot, Z. Klink, C. Schlemmer, A. Elbez, E. Varon. (2011) Résistance aux antibiotiques des pneumocoques et H. influenzae isolés de la flore rhinopharyngée d’enfants présentant une otite moyenne aiguë entre 2006 et 2010. Archives de Pédiatrie 18:8, 926-931
CrossRef8
K. Vuorenoja, J. Jalava, L. Lindholm, P. A. Tähtinen, M. K. Laine, K. Thorn, A. Ruohola. (2011) Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage by the Binax NOW test with nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs in young children. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
CrossRef9
Eugene Leibovitz. (2011) Antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media in children: to wait or not to wait?. Clinical Investigation 1:7, 903-906
CrossRef10
Alice van Zon, Anne GM Schilder, Geert J van der Heijden, Alice van Zon. 2011. Antibiotics for otitis media with effusion in children. .
CrossRef11
(2011) Treatment of Acute Otitis Media in Children. New England Journal of Medicine 364:18, 1775-1779
Full Text12
Craig Mellis. (2011) HEADS UP. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 47:5, 305-306
CrossRef13
Susanna Esposito, Paola Marchisio, Rossana Tenconi, Nicola Principi. (2011) Antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media in pediatrics. Future Microbiology 6:5, 485-488
CrossRef14
D. Schiff. (2011) Antibiotic Rx of AOM in Children <2 Years: Redux. AAP Grand Rounds 25:4, 37-37
CrossRef15
Klein, Jerome O., . (2011) Is Acute Otitis Media a Treatable Disease?. New England Journal of Medicine 364:2, 168-169
Full Text16
B.J. Balough. (2011) A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Antimicrobial Treatment for Acute Otitis Media. Yearbook of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2011, 89-90
CrossRef
- Comments (8)
-
8 Reader's Comments
HELMUT HELWIG, MD | Physician | Disclosure: NoneFREIBURG GermanyJanuary 18, 2011A Marketing Revival Study?
A careful study of this carefully designed study including the appendix, does not convince the reader of the profit for the kids suffering AOM. Why was Augmentin and not amoxicillin used? One is missing the discussion of the nasopharyngeal colonisation instead of the MEF culture. Among the uncountsble treatment studies for AOM the newer ones are in favor of 5 or 7 days treatment. Why was the 10 day regimen choosen? Finally the relapse rate at day 21-25 with 16 % vs 19 % is disillusioning for the reader. Thus I fully agree with the comments of Kevin Nufer and Ashley Shreeves
KEVIN NUFER, MD | Physician | Disclosure: NonePORTLAND ORJanuary 18, 2011Calculating the number needed to treat...
In this paper, the number needed to treat to find the primary outcome was 17, so you needed to treat 17 kids to see 1 benefit. On the other hand, the number needed to harm for diarrhea was 6 and for diaper rash was 3. You needed to treat 17 kids for 1 benefit but only needed to treat 6 kis for 1 case of diarrhea and 3 for 1 case or diaper rash.
ASHLEY SHREVES, MD | Physician | Disclosure: NoneNEW YORK NYJanuary 16, 2011Changes between trial registration and publication
I encourage everyone to look at the trial protocol for Hoberman et al as listed on Clinicaltrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00377260?term=otitis+media&rank=9). It suggests dishonesty and a lack of transparancy in the conduct of this trial. There are currently 2 primary outcomes listed (not 3 as in the manuscript), and even the 2nd one listed on the site was added after completion of the trial. (Please click on "history of changes" link, there are 72). These primary outcomes both relate to "time to resolution of symptoms." The 3rd "primary outcome" listed in the publication, symptom burden over time, is actually a secondary outcome and is still listed on the registry site as such. It would seem that the lead author is highly conflicted, receives "honoraria and travel-expense reimbursement from GlaxoSmithKline" which is the maker of Augmentin-ES but am still surprised that these types of ethical lapses can happen in a trial where the health of young children is at stake. Serious disappointment.
Editor's Comment
The following is a response from the author:
Dr. Shreves is correct that there were inconsistencies between statements in our report and what appears on the ClinicalTrials.gov web site. Her presumptions, however, are at variance with the facts. Drawing conclusions about the planning and conduct of our study from what is currently shown on the ClinicalTrials.gov web site is unjustified. Except for the outcome data that we have posted to the web site since completion of the trial, beginning in April 2010, the posting of other material to the site, including everything in the “History of Changes,” was performed by an outside contractor for the funding agency and/or by agency abstractors, often long after the actual events. Some pertinent material was never posted; this omission is being corrected. Regarding the two items Dr. Shreves questioned specifically, the facts are that no primary outcome measure was added after completion of the trial, and symptom burden over time was an a priori primary outcome measure. GlaxoSmithKline provided no support for our study;support for attending an unrelated scientific meeting was fully disclosed.
-- Alejandro Hoberman, M.D.PHILIP MILLER, MD | Physician | Disclosure: NonePORTLAND ORJanuary 15, 2011Treatment of Acute Otitis Media in Children Under 2 Years of Age
There are two aspects of treating otitis media. The first is how the eardrum looks. The second is how the child looks. An abnormal TM in a child doing fairly well can be observed, while a child with a similar finding, no matter what the TM looks like, who is febrile, fussy, awakening at night, should be a candidate for antibiotic treatment.
KAZI ANWAR, MD | Physician | Disclosure: NoneRIYDH Saudi ArabiaJanuary 14, 2011ACUTE OTITIS MEDIA TREATMENT
Congratulation to both authors for such well-designed RCTs, the findings of which almost resolve the question whether children with AOM benefit from antibiotics. We had been waiting for an appropriately designed study to resolve the controversies antibiotic therapy vs. observation, which they resolved. But why children receiving antibiotics had more side effects still remains to be explored. From our experience in Bangladesh we fully agree with Dr. Jerome Klein that Drs. Hoberman and Ruohola successfully provided the best data yet to answer the important question about whether young children with AOM recover more quickly with antibiotics. However, more research can help to identify which patients derive the greatest benefit, so as to minimize unnecessary antibiotic treatment. That approach can use antibiotic profiles of individual country or communities to facilitate preventing emergence of bacterial resistance.
CHRISTIAN DORNAUS, MD | Physician | Disclosure: NoneSAO PAULO BrazilJanuary 13, 2011A Very Common Problem
PARENTS SHOULD BE TOLD THESE NUMBERS OF RESPONSE AND FAILURE TO ANTIBIOTICS AND PLACEBO AND PARTICIPATE IN THE PROCESS OF DECISION MAKING REGARDING TREATMENT OF THEIR CHILD. THIS WILL INCREASE SATISFACTION AND DILUTE RESPONSIBILITY.
KATIA STEWART | Student | Disclosure: NoneALEXANDRIA VAJanuary 13, 2011Careful when extrapolating from these findings...
It's very important that people reading this article read it in full; the population in this study seems to be strikingly different from the US population. For example, the pneumococcal vaccine coverage (and therefore the circulating serotypes) seems to be lower in the population studied; also - and maybe related to the first one- only 1 case of S pneumoniae resistance to penicillin was found in this series. It's hard to predict what would have been the outcome of a similar study in the US, but one can predict that 40mg/kg of amoxicillin wouldn't be treating most of our pneumococcal infections. We would have to go higher in the dose, and we would go even higher on the side effects, even for amoxicillin alone.
Apart from all that, 2/3 of the placebo treated children didn't need anything but symptomatic treatment, which is encouraging. So antibiotic therapy stills not mandatory overall...but again, we need to have a similar study with our own microbiological profile . - Letters
REPLY TO: Calculating the number needed to treat...
In this study, the number-needed-to treat to avoid 1 case of treatment failure was 3.8 children (95% CI, 2.7 to 6.2), not 17 as Kevin Nufer had counted.
It is of note, that the primary outcome was based on the assessment of the overall condition of the child which included also adverse events as described in the article. Thus, this NNT 3.8 is the NET effect of the treatment.
The term “diarrhea” is somewhat misleading because the great majority of the children had loose stools, not true diarrhea. It affected 47.8% of the children in the amoxicillin–clavulanate group and 26.6% in the placebo group. In all children resolution was spontaneous within few days.
Loose stools are something concrete, easy to notice. However, our major concern should be focused on the development of resistance. Therefore, antimicrobials should be given only to patients with definite diagnosis.