Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

E2-2 Protein and Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy

Keith H. Baratz, M.D., Nirubol Tosakulwong, B.S., Euijung Ryu, Ph.D., William L. Brown, O.D., Kari Branham, M.S., Wei Chen, Ph.D., Khoa D. Tran, Ph.D., Katharina E. Schmid-Kubista, M.D., John R. Heckenlively, M.D., Anand Swaroop, Ph.D., Goncalo Abecasis, Ph.D., Kent R. Bailey, Ph.D., and Albert O. Edwards, M.D., Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1016-1024September 9, 2010

Abstract

Background

Fuchs's corneal dystrophy (FCD) is a leading cause of corneal transplantation and affects 5% of persons in the United States who are over the age of 40 years. Clinically visible deposits called guttae develop under the corneal endothelium in patients with FCD. A loss of endothelial cells and deposition of an abnormal extracellular matrix are observed microscopically. In advanced disease, the cornea swells and becomes cloudy because the remaining endothelial cells are not sufficient to keep the cornea dehydrated and clear. Although rare genetic variation that contributes to both early-onset and typical late-onset forms of FCD has been identified, to our knowledge, no common variants have been reported.

Methods

We performed a genomewide association study and replicated the most significant observations in a second, independent group of subjects.

Results

Alleles in the transcription factor 4 gene (TCF4), encoding a member of the E-protein family (E2-2), were associated with typical FCD (P=2.3×10−26). The association increased the odds of having FCD by a factor of 30 for persons with two copies of the disease variants (homozygotes) and discriminated between case subjects and control subjects with about 76% accuracy. At least two regions of the TCF4 locus were associated independently with FCD. Alleles in the gene encoding protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type G (PTPRG) were associated with FCD (P=4.0×10−7), but the association did not reach genomewide significance.

Conclusions

Genetic variation in TCF4 contributes to the development of FCD. (Funded by the National Eye Institute and others.)

Media in This Article

Figure 1Features of Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy (FCD).
Figure 2Association between 338,727 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy (FCD).
Article

Fuchs's corneal dystrophy (FCD) is a progressive, bilateral condition characterized by dysfunction of the corneal endothelium, leading to reduced vision. The prevalence of FCD has been estimated at about 5% among persons over the age of 40 years in the United States.1 Corneal edema that is associated with FCD may progress after cataract surgery and is the most common indication for the 42,000 corneal transplantations that take place each year in the United States. Enthusiasm for refractive surgery is decreased among patients who are at high risk for FCD.2 Thus, the ability to diagnose FCD before symptoms develop and knowledge of the biologic pathways leading to the disorder are important for the approximately 10 million patients worldwide who undergo refractive or cataract surgery each year.

The vision loss in patients with FCD results from a loss of corneal transparency associated with the irregularity of inner corneal layers in early disease and edema of the cornea in advanced disease. Ultrastructural features of FCD include loss and attenuation of endothelial cells, with thickening and excrescences of the underlying basement membrane.3 These excrescences, called guttae, are the clinical hallmark of FCD and become more numerous with progression of the disease. As the endothelial layer develops confluent guttae in the central cornea, the cells are no longer able to keep the cornea dehydrated and clear (Figure 1Figure 1Features of Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy (FCD).).

FCD is thought to be a genetically complex trait that has been observed in 38% of the first-degree relatives of probands.4 The condition is often divided into early-onset familial disease and age-related disease. Early-onset FCD is rare and has been linked to mutations in the COL8A2 gene, encoding the α2 subunit of collagen VIII, a component of the endothelial basement membrane.5 The two types of FCD may be different diseases, since guttae are not typically present in the early-onset type.6

Rare autosomal dominant mutations leading to age-related FCD have been found in three genes. FCD develops in patients with vitreoretinal degeneration due to mutations in the gene encoding potassium inwardly-rectifying channel subfamily J member 13 (KCNJ13).7,8 Mutations in the sodium-borate cotransporter gene SLC4A11 on chromosome 20p12 have been reported to cause FCD, and mutations in this gene were previously shown to cause congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy, a very rare form of congenital corneal endothelial dysfunction.9 Rare variation in the gene encoding zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 protein (ZEB1) on chromosome 10p11.2 was identified in 4 of 192 subjects with FCD.10 Mutations in ZEB1 had previously been found in posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy, a clinically distinct and rare corneal endothelial disorder.10 Variation in these genes does not seem to contribute substantively to the risk of FCD but does implicate these biologic pathways in the disease process.

Linkage studies have identified multiple chromosomal loci associated with common age-related FCD, including chromosomes 5q33.1–q35.2, 9p22.1–9p24.1, 13ptel–13q12.13, and 18q21.2–q21.32.10-14 However, genetic variation contributing to FCD within these loci has not been identified. Since the genetic basis of only a small proportion of FCD cases is known, we performed a genomewide association study to identify loci contributing to typical age-related FCD.

Methods

Subjects

We recruited subjects for the discovery group from our clinics and examined their eyes, using specular biomicroscopy (Table 1Table 1Association between Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy and the Most Significant Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism on Chromosome 18 (rs613872 in Intron 3 of TCF4) among Case and Control Subjects.). Subjects were considered to have FCD if the clinical description of the cornea was consistent with grade 1 guttae or higher on a published scale (ranging from 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no guttae and 6 indicating confluent guttae with corneal edema) or if either cornea had been transplanted because of FCD.4 Subjects who were 60 years of age or older were considered to be controls if no guttae were observed. We excluded subjects with guttae graded as less than 1 or in whom the corneal endothelium could not be evaluated. All subjects reported being of European descent. The distribution of subjects according to Krachmer grade is presented in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

The study was conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each institution. The study was conducted in accordance with the protocol as amended. All subjects provided written informed consent.

Genomewide Association Study

Archived samples of genomic DNA were used to perform a collaborative genomewide association study.15 The genotyping was performed at the Center for Inherited Disease Research with the use of age-related macular degeneration as the phenotype. We recoded the available subjects, described above, for FCD (Table 1). Each affected case subject was matched to two control subjects on the basis of age and sex. After applying quality-control filters, we evaluated the autosomal genotype distributions from the Illumina 370K Beadchip panel, using log-additive genotype models, as implemented in SAS software, version 9.1. Genotype distributions along the X chromosome were not associated with FCD, regardless of whether the minor allele was coded as 1, 1.5, or 2 copies in male subjects.

Replication Studies

The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with the highest association with FCD were selected for a test of replication in an independent group of subjects. The replication group consisted of 150 case subjects, each of whom was matched to a single control subject according to age and sex. The genotyping was performed with the use of TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems), as described previously.16

Imputation, Single SNP, and Haplotype Studies

We imputed SNPs across loci associated with FCD, as described previously.17 We performed single SNP analyses on genotype distributions, using imputed genotype dosage. Imputation is a method that allows use of the known pattern of coinheritance of SNPs (linkage disequilibrium) to predict the genotype of nearby variants that were not actually genotyped in the original genomewide association study. We calculated linkage disequilibrium (r2) between SNPs, using the imputed dosage. We then performed haplotype studies, using the most likely imputed genotype and score.18 Manual haplotype inspection was performed with Haploview, and three-SNP sliding-window approaches were implemented in haplo.stats with the use of R statistical software.18,19 In the sliding-window approach, the overall association between haplotypes composed of the first three SNPs and disease is determined. The process is repeated for the second, third, and fourth SNPs and for each subsequent group of three contiguous SNPs. We performed conditional analyses of SNPs and haplotypes and estimated population attributable fractions, as described previously20 (for details, see the Supplementary Appendix).

Results

Genomewide Association and Replication Studies

The full set of results that were obtained through genomewide analysis is available in the Genotypes and Phenotypes database at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap (accession number, phs000246.v1.p1). The genomewide analysis of specimens from the discovery group (Table 1) revealed one region that had a significant association with FCD (Figure 2Figure 2Association between 338,727 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy (FCD).). This region spans the gene encoding transcription factor 4 (TCF4), which is located on chromosome 18q21.2. The association across this region was confirmed in an independent group of subjects (Table 1). Each additional risk allele of the SNP that was most highly associated with FCD (rs613872) increased the risk of disease by a factor of 5.47 (Table 1).

Ten additional genomic regions showed an association with FCD, but these associations were not significant at the genomewide level in the discovery set (threshold for significance, P=5×10−8). We tested 12 SNPs from these 10 regions for association in the replication set, using the selection criteria described in the Supplementary Appendix. Only one of these loci, which houses the gene encoding protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type G (PTPRG), was also associated with FCD in the replication group. The association between FCD and PTPRG genotypes in the combined subject groups was strong (P=1.30×10−6) but did not reach genomewide significance (see Tables S4 and S5 in the Supplementary Appendix). Additional tests of replication are required to determine whether the association with PTPRG genotypes is valid.

Single SNP Association across the TCF4 Locus

We genotyped five SNPs in the genomic region spanning TCF4 in the replication group and confirmed the association with FCD (for details, see the “Replication studies” section and Tables S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Appendix). We used 152 SNPs that were genotyped across the TCF4 locus in the original genomewide association study to impute a total of 720 SNPs in order to understand how the association with FCD varied across this region.

Figure 3Figure 3Association between Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy (FCD) across 1 Million Base Pairs of the Chromosome 18 Locus That Spans TCF4. shows that many SNPs across the TCF4 locus are associated with FCD. Furthermore, although many of the SNPs are highly correlated, the low coinheritance between rs613872 and some of the other associated SNPs suggests that multiple variants are independently associated with FCD. We confirmed this observation using stepwise regression and implicated four SNPs as being independently associated with FCD (Table S5 in the Supplementary Appendix).

Haplotypes across the TCF4 Locus

Genotypes from adjacent or nearby SNPs can be used to estimate the common chromosomal segments or haplotypes of DNA (as defined by variable markers) that are present in the population. These haplotypes help to identify regions along the TCF4 locus that are independently associated with FCD. We observed that the haplotypes that were most strongly associated with FCD spanned exon 6 and that haplotypes from other regions of the locus were independently associated with FCD after conditioning (Figure 4Figure 4Regions along the TCF4 Locus Showing an Independent Association with Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy (FCD)., and Tables S6, S7, and S8 and Figure S5 in the Supplementary Appendix). The individual haplotypes that were most strongly associated with FCD (P<1.0×10−8) had a prevalence of 11 to 17% among case subjects and 1 to 4% among control subjects. Thus, uncommon haplotypes in multiple regions of TCF4 had a large effect on the risk of FCD.

Variation across the TCF4 Locus and FCD

We used the four genotyped SNPs (rs17595731, rs613872, rs9954153, and rs2286812) that were independently associated with FCD across the TCF4 locus to construct a risk model, using the discovery group (for details, see the Supplementary Appendix). The model was based on multiple logistic-regression analyses with additive linear effects for each of the four SNPs. The risk model distinguished between case subjects and control subjects with 76% accuracy, with the use of the concordance statistic. Application of this model to the replication group produced a similar result, distinguishing case subjects from control subjects with 78% accuracy. In our preliminary analyses, the effect of TCF4 variants on the risk of FCD appeared to increase with the severity of the disease.

Discussion

We identified two regions of the genome that appear to contribute to FCD. The first region spans the TCF4 locus and was significantly associated with FCD at the genomewide level. The second region, spanning the PTPRG locus, was strongly associated with FCD, but the association did not reach genomewide significance. Genetic variation across the TCF4 locus may explain the linkage signal with FCD previously observed on chromosome 18q21.11 The high impact on disease risk suggests that a pathway regulated by E2-2, the protein encoded by TCF4, is a major contributor to FCD. So far, we have not identified variation in the coding region of TCF4 that is associated with FCD, and we do not know which genetic variation in this region directly drives the associations that we have observed. It is possible that risk is determined by noncoding variants that influence the forms or extent of expression of E2-2.

The protein encoded by TCF4 has had many names but is usually referred to as E2-2. The protein product of the gene encoding transcription factor 7–like 2 (TCF7L2) is also called T-cell factor 4 (TCF4), which has created confusion in the literature. E2-2 is a member of the ubiquitously expressed class I basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factors that are involved in cellular growth and differentiation.21 Homodimers or heterodimers with other classes of bHLH proteins bind Ephrussi (E-box) promoter sequences within target genes, either suppressing or activating tissue-specific gene transcription.22-24 Loss of function of one copy of E2-2 through coding mutations or genomic deletions gives rise to the Pitt–Hopkins syndrome, a form of syndromic mental retardation characterized by seizures and episodic hyperventilation.25 FCD is not known to develop in patients with this syndrome.

E2-2 is expressed in the developing corneal endothelium and is an attractive candidate for FCD (Figure S6 in the Supplementary Appendix). E2-2 is implicated in both the development and suppression of cancer.26 It represses the expression of the cell-adhesion protein E-cadherin, resulting in the loss of cellular polarity and cell-to-cell contact. E2-2 also has an important role in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition,27 which is a normal aspect of cell migration in embryogenesis and in promoting tumor-cell invasion and metastasis.27,28 Another protein (ZEB1) that is implicated in FCD also binds E-box promoter sites and is involved in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through E-cadherin repression.29 ZEB1 expression is up-regulated by E2-2, and because mutations that inactivate ZEB1 are thought to contribute to FCD, these observations suggest the possibility that the TCF4 variants associated with FCD could confer risk by altering the expression of ZEB1.

PTPRG belongs to the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family, members of which regulate a wide array of cellular functions, including growth, differentiation, cell mobility, gene expression, cellular adhesion, ion-channel control, and oncogenesis.30-34 Ligands regulate the phosphatase activity of PTPRG by binding to its extracellular domain.35 It has yet to be determined whether PTPRG interacts with ZEB1 or E2-2.

The biologic pathways that are implicated by the contribution of TCF4 and probably ZEB1 and PTPRG variants to typical FCD suggest several mechanisms of pathogenesis. One mechanism could be a decrease in the number of endothelial cells through senescence, deficient proliferation, or migration. The diminished proliferation of progenitor cells and premature senescence observed in a mouse model of Zeb1 deficiency36 could lead to a loss of corneal endothelial cells, as seen in patients with FCD. If the variants in the TCF4 locus that are associated with FCD decrease ZEB1 activity, perhaps early senescence or muted formation of progenitor cells gives rise to disease. However, the human corneal endothelium is traditionally considered a nonreplicating tissue layer, and this hypothesis does not explain the extracellular deposits that characterize FCD.37 Nevertheless, there is some evidence of corneal endothelial proliferation in patients with FCD, such as the expression of stem-cell markers and mitotic figures in the corneal periphery.38,39 Alternatively, increased mesenchymal characteristics, with enhanced extracellular matrix deposition, would probably ensue if the risk variants increased E2-2 activity.

Another mechanism could be increased cellular stress through abnormal development of the basement membrane, abnormal ion-channel regulation, or premature senescence. Support for the role of these processes comes from observations of increased endoplasmic reticulum stress, the unfolded-protein response, markers of senescence, and apoptosis in the corneal endothelium in patients with FCD.40-42

In conclusion, our findings suggest that genetic variation in the TCF4 locus substantively contributes to the risk of FCD. The genetic risk appears to localize to multiple regions of the TCF4 locus. The prevalence of the risk haplotypes is relatively low (a few to several percent), but the presence of these haplotypes confers a high risk of FCD.

Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (EY014467, EY016862, and HHSN268200782096C), the Foundation Fighting Blindness, the American Health Assistance Foundation, Research to Prevent Blindness, and the Max Kade Foundation.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

This article (10.1056/NEJMoa1007064) was published on August 25, 2010, at NEJM.org.

We thank William Rhoades and Katherine Augustaitis for their assistance in identifying subjects from the University of Michigan for inclusion in the study, investigators in the genomewide association study of age-related macular degeneration, and our clinical colleagues and patients for participating in the study.

Source Information

From the Departments of Ophthalmology (K.H.B., W.L.B., K.E.S.-K.) and Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (N.T., E.R., K.R.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (K.B., J.R.H.) and Biostatistics (W.C., G.A.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; the Institute for Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene (K.D.T., A.O.E.); and the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD (A.S.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Edwards at the Institute for Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1229, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    Lorenzetti DW, Uotila MH, Parikh N, Kaufman HE. Central cornea guttata: incidence in the general population. Am J Ophthalmol 1967;64:1155-1158
    Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Moshirfar M, Feiz V, Feilmeier MR, Kang PC. Laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with corneal guttata and family history of Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:2281-2286
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Hogan MJ, Wood I, Fine M. Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy of the cornea: 29th Sanford Gifford Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;78:363-383
    Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Krachmer JH, Purcell JJ, Young CW, Bucher KD. Corneal endothelial dystrophy: a study of 64 families. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:2036-2039
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Biswas S, Munier FL, Yardley J, et al. Missense mutations in COL8A2, the gene encoding the alpha2 chain of type VIII collagen, cause two forms of corneal endothelial dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10:2415-2423
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Zhang C, Bell WR, Sundin OH, et al. Immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy of early-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy in three cases with the same L450W COL8A2 mutation. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2006;104:85-97
    Medline

  7. 7

    Hejtmancik JF, Jiao X, Li A, et al. Mutations in KCNJ13 cause autosomal-dominant snowflake vitreoretinal degeneration. Am J Hum Genet 2008;82:174-180
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Lee MM, Ritter R III, Hirose T, Vu CD, Edwards AO. Snowflake vitreoretinal degeneration: follow-up of the original family. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2418-2426
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Vithana EN, Morgan PE, Ramprasad V, et al. SLC4A11 mutations in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet 2008;17:656-666
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Riazuddin SA, Zaghloul NA, Al-Saif A, et al. Missense mutations in TCF8 cause late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy and interact with FCD4 on chromosome 9p. Am J Hum Genet 2010;86:45-53
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Sundin OH, Broman KW, Chang HH, Vito EC, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD. A common locus for late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy maps to 18q21.2-q21.32. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:3919-3926
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Riazuddin SA, Eghrari AO, Al Saif A, et al. Linkage of a mild late-onset phenotype of Fuchs corneal dystrophy to a novel locus at 5q33.1-q35.2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:5667-5671
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Sundin OH, Jun AS, Broman KW, et al. Linkage of late-onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy to a novel locus at 13pTel-13q12.13. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:140-145
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Afshari NA, Li YJ, Pericak-Vance MA, Gregory S, Klintworth GK. Genome-wide linkage scan in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50:1093-1097
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Chen W, Stambolian D, Edwards AO, et al. Genetic variants near TIMP3 and high-density lipoprotein-associated loci influence susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:7401-7406
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Edwards AO, Ritter R III, Abel KJ, Manning A, Panhuysen C, Farrer LA. Complement factor H polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration. Science 2005;308:421-424
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Li Y, Willer C, Sanna S, Abecasis G. Genotype imputation. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2009;10:387-406
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Schaid DJ, Rowland CM, Tines DE, Jacobson RM, Poland GA. Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70:425-434
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 2005;21:263-265
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Hecker LA, Edwards AO, Ryu E, et al. Genetic control of the alternative pathway of complement in humans and age-related macular degeneration. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:209-215
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Murre C, Bain G, van Dijk MA, et al. Structure and function of helix-loop-helix proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994;1218:129-135
    Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Ephrussi A, Church GM, Tonegawa S, Gilbert W. B lineage-specific interactions of an immunoglobulin enhancer with cellular factors in vivo. Science 1985;227:134-140
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Skerjanc IS, Truong J, Filion P, McBurney MW. A splice variant of the ITF-2 transcript encodes a transcription factor that inhibits MyoD activity. J Biol Chem 1996;271:3555-3561
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Flora A, Garcia JJ, Thaller C, Zoghbi HY. The E-protein Tcf4 interacts with Math1 to regulate differentiation of a specific subset of neuronal progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:15382-15387
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Amiel J, Rio M, de Pontual L, et al. Mutations in TCF4, encoding a class I basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, are responsible for Pitt-Hopkins syndrome, a severe epileptic encephalopathy associated with autonomic dysfunction. Am J Hum Genet 2007;80:988-993
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Kolligs FT, Nieman MT, Winer I, et al. ITF-2, a downstream target of the Wnt/TCF pathway, is activated in human cancers with beta-catenin defects and promotes neoplastic transformation. Cancer Cell 2002;1:145-155
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  27. 27

    Sobrado VR, Moreno-Bueno G, Cubillo E, et al. The class I bHLH factors E2-2A and E2-2B regulate EMT. J Cell Sci 2009;122:1014-1024
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Thiery JP. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:442-454
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Eger A, Aigner K, Sonderegger S, et al. DeltaEF1 is a transcriptional repressor of E-cadherin and regulates epithelial plasticity in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2005;24:2375-2385
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    Ratcliffe CF, Qu Y, McCormick KA, et al. A sodium channel signaling complex: modulation by associated receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase beta. Nat Neurosci 2000;3:437-444
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Fischer EH, Charbonneau H, Tonks NK. Protein tyrosine phosphatases: a diverse family of intracellular and transmembrane enzymes. Science 1991;253:401-406
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Beltran PJ, Bixby JL. Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases as mediators of cellular adhesion. Front Biosci 2003;8:d87-d99
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  33. 33

    van Niekerk CC, Poels LG. Reduced expression of protein tyrosine phosphatase gamma in lung and ovarian tumors. Cancer Lett 1999;137:61-73
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    Liu S, Sugimoto Y, Sorio C, Tecchio C, Lin YC. Function analysis of estrogenically regulated protein tyrosine phosphatase gamma (PTPgamma) in human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Oncogene 2004;23:1256-1262
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  35. 35

    Bouyain S, Watkins DJ. The protein tyrosine phosphatases PTPRZ and PTPRG bind to distinct members of the contactin family of neural recognition molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:2443-2448
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  36. 36

    Liu Y, El-Naggar S, Darling DS, Higashi Y, Dean DC. Zeb1 links epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cellular senescence. Development 2008;135:579-588
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  37. 37

    Joyce NC, Navon SE, Roy S, Zieske JD. Expression of cell cycle-associated proteins in human and rabbit corneal endothelium in situ. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:1566-1575
    Web of Science | Medline

  38. 38

    Laing RA, Neubauer L, Oak SS, Kayne HL, Leibowitz HM. Evidence for mitosis in the adult corneal endothelium. Ophthalmology 1984;91:1129-1134
    Web of Science | Medline

  39. 39

    McGowan SL, Edelhauser HF, Pfister RR, Whikehart DR. Stem cell markers in the human posterior limbus and corneal endothelium of unwounded and wounded corneas. Mol Vis 2007;13:1984-2000
    Web of Science | Medline

  40. 40

    Engler C, Kelliher C, Spitze AR, Speck CL, Eberhart CG, Jun AS. Unfolded protein response in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a unifying pathogenic pathway? Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:194-202
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  41. 41

    Wang Z, Handa JT, Green WR, Stark WJ, Weinberg RS, Jun AS. Advanced glycation end products and receptors in Fuchs' dystrophy corneas undergoing Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1453-1460
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  42. 42

    Jurkunas UV, Rawe I, Bitar MS, et al. Decreased expression of peroxiredoxins in Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:2956-2963
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (13)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    David A Mackey, Nicole M Warrington, Alex W Hewitt, Sandra K Oates, Seyhan Yazar, Alla Soloshenko, Geoffrey J Crawford, Jenny A Mountain, Craig E Pennell. (2012) Role of the TCF4 Gene Intronic Variant in Normal Variation of Corneal Endothelium. Cornea 31:2, 162-166
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Allen O. Eghrari, Elyse J. McGlumphy, Benjamin W. Iliff, Jiangxia Wang, David Emmert, S. Amer Riazuddin, Nicholas Katsanis, John D. Gottsch. (2012) Prevalence and Severity of Fuchs Corneal Dystrophy in Tangier Island. American Journal of Ophthalmology
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    A. S. Jun, H. Meng, N. Ramanan, M. Matthaei, S. Chakravarti, R. Bonshek, G. C. M. Black, R. Grebe, M. Kimos. (2012) An alpha 2 collagen VIII transgenic knock-in mouse model of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy shows early endothelial cell unfolded protein response and apoptosis. Human Molecular Genetics 21:2, 384-393
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Abraham Kuot, Alex W Hewitt, Kim Griggs, Sonja Klebe, Richard Mills, Vishal Jhanji, Jamie E Craig, Shiwani Sharma, Kathryn P Burdon. (2012) Association of TCF4 and CLU polymorphisms with Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy and implication of CLU and TGFBI proteins in the disease process. European Journal of Human Genetics
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Rajiv R. Mohan, Jonathan C.K. Tovey, Ajay Sharma, Ashish Tandon. (2012) Gene therapy in the Cornea: 2005–present. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 31:1, 43-64
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Megan D Louttit, Laura J Kopplin, Robert P Igo, Jeremy R Fondran, Angela Tagliaferri, David Bardenstein, Anthony J Aldave, Christopher R Croasdale, Marianne O Price, George O Rosenwasser, Jonathan H Lass, Sudha K Iyengar. (2012) A Multicenter Study to Map Genes for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: Baseline Characteristics and Heritability. Cornea 31:1, 26-35
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Antje Brockschmidt, Alida Filippi, Peter Charbel Issa, Michael Nelles, Horst Urbach, Nicole Eter, Wolfgang Driever, Ruthild G. Weber. (2011) Neurologic and ocular phenotype in Pitt–Hopkins syndrome and a zebrafish model. Human Genetics 130:5, 645-655
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    S. Steinberg, S. de Jong, , O. A. Andreassen, T. Werge, A. D. Borglum, O. Mors, P. B. Mortensen, O. Gustafsson, J. Costas, O. P. H. Pietilainen, D. Demontis, S. Papiol, J. Huttenlocher, M. Mattheisen, R. Breuer, E. Vassos, I. Giegling, G. Fraser, N. Walker, A. Tuulio-Henriksson, J. Suvisaari, J. Lonnqvist, T. Paunio, I. Agartz, I. Melle, S. Djurovic, E. Strengman, , G. Jurgens, B. Glenthoj, L. Terenius, D. M. Hougaard, T. Orntoft, C. Wiuf, M. Didriksen, M. V. Hollegaard, M. Nordentoft, R. van Winkel, G. Kenis, L. Abramova, V. Kaleda, M. Arrojo, J. Sanjuan, C. Arango, S. Sperling, M. Rossner, M. Ribolsi, V. Magni, A. Siracusano, C. Christiansen, L. A. Kiemeney, J. Veldink, L. van den Berg, A. Ingason, P. Muglia, R. Murray, M. M. Nothen, E. Sigurdsson, H. Petursson, U. Thorsteinsdottir, A. Kong, I. A. Rubino, M. De Hert, J. M. Rethelyi, I. Bitter, E. G. Jonsson, V. Golimbet, A. Carracedo, H. Ehrenreich, N. Craddock, M. J. Owen, M. C. O'Donovan, , M. Ruggeri, S. Tosato, L. Peltonen, R. A. Ophoff, D. A. Collier, D. St Clair, M. Rietschel, S. Cichon, H. Stefansson, D. Rujescu, K. Stefansson. (2011) Common variants at VRK2 and TCF4 conferring risk of schizophrenia. Human Molecular Genetics 20:20, 4076-4081
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Thore Schmedt, Mariana Mazzini Silva, Alireza Ziaei, Ula Jurkunas. (2011) Molecular bases of corneal endothelial dystrophies. Experimental Eye Research
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Feero, W. Gregory, Guttmacher, Alan E., , Sheffield, Val C., Stone, Edwin M., . (2011) Genomics and the Eye. New England Journal of Medicine 364:20, 1932-1942
    Full Text

  11. 11

    J H Fingert. (2011) Primary open-angle glaucoma genes. Eye 25:5, 587-595
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    (2010) Research highlights. Nature Genetics 42:10, 825-825
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Wright, Alan F., Dhillon, Baljean, . (2010) Major Progress in Fuchs's Corneal Dystrophy. New England Journal of Medicine 363:11, 1072-1075
    Full Text