Original Article
Hearing Improvement after Bevacizumab in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2
N Engl J Med 2009; 361:358-367July 23, 2009
- Abstract
Background
Profound hearing loss is a serious complication of neurofibromatosis type 2, a genetic condition associated with bilateral vestibular schwannomas, benign tumors that arise from the eighth cranial nerve. There is no medical treatment for such tumors.
Methods
We determined the expression pattern of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and three of its receptors, VEGFR-2, neuropilin-1, and neuropilin-2, in paraffin-embedded samples from 21 vestibular schwannomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 and from 22 sporadic schwannomas. Ten consecutive patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and progressive vestibular schwannomas who were not candidates for standard treatment were treated with bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody. An imaging response was defined as a decrease of at least 20% in tumor volume, as compared with baseline. A hearing response was defined as a significant increase in the word-recognition score, as compared with baseline.
Results
VEGF was expressed in 100% of vestibular schwannomas and VEGFR-2 in 32% of tumor vessels on immunohistochemical analysis. Before treatment, the median annual volumetric growth rate for 10 index tumors was 62%. After bevacizumab treatment in the 10 patients, tumors shrank in 9 patients, and 6 patients had an imaging response, which was maintained in 4 patients during 11 to 16 months of follow-up. The median best response to treatment was a volumetric reduction of 26%. Three patients were not eligible for a hearing response; of the remaining seven patients, four had a hearing response, two had stable hearing, and one had progressive hearing loss. There were 21 adverse events of grade 1 or 2.
Conclusions
VEGF blockade with bevacizumab improved hearing in some, but not all, patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and was associated with a reduction in the volume of most growing vestibular schwannomas.
Media in This Article
Figure 1
Angiogenic Profile of Vestibular Schwannomas.Figure 2
Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Measures during Treatment with Bevacizumab.Article Activity
- Article
Neurofibromatosis type 2 is a dominantly inherited genetic condition with a birth prevalence of 1 in 25,000.1 Bilateral vestibular schwannomas (also known as acoustic neuromas), which are benign tumors composed of neoplastic Schwann cells that arise from the eighth cranial nerve, are the hallmark of neurofibromatosis 2. These tumors cause progressive hearing loss in most patients with neurofibromatosis type 2, who commonly lose all functional hearing during early adulthood or middle age. Standard therapy for growing sporadic, unilateral vestibular schwannomas includes surgical removal or radiation therapy. Both treatments usually achieve tumor control, but at the frequent cost of hearing loss in the affected ear.2,3
Treatment options are limited for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and a growing vestibular schwannoma ipsilateral to the only ear with hearing. Results of surgery and radiation therapy for vestibular schwannomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 are worse than for sporadic tumors, because rates of tumor control are reduced and iatrogenic hearing loss is more frequent.4-6 Although the morbidity of active treatment can be prohibitively high, the consequences of unchecked tumor growth (including progressive brain-stem compression) are also severe. Currently, no medical treatments for tumors associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 are available, and a safe and effective treatment for these patients is needed.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a critical mediator of tumor angiogenesis and vessel permeability.7-9 VEGF and its receptor VEGFR-1 have been detected in schwannomas, and increased levels of these factors correlate with increased rates of tumor growth.10-14 Although schwannomas are not considered vascular tumors, the non–VEGF-related, antiangiogenic compound AGM-1470 inhibits angiogenesis and reduces the growth of nerve-sheath tumors in mouse models.15 The VEGF-neutralizing antibody bevacizumab has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in the treatment of cancers, but no studies have been performed in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 or vestibular schwannomas.
Here we describe a retrospective study of 10 consecutive patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and growing vestibular schwannomas who were treated with bevacizumab. We chose this agent on the basis of tumor immunohistochemical analyses suggesting a potential pathophysiological role for the VEGF pathway in vestibular schwannomas. We provide radiologic and audiologic evidence that bevacizumab treatment offered durable clinical benefit to some patients, including a reduction in tumor volume and an improvement in chronic hearing loss.
Methods
Immunohistochemical Analyses
Paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 21 schwannomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2, 22 sporadic schwannomas, and 9 normal spinal-nerve roots were immunostained with the following antibodies: CD31, VEGF, VEGFR-2, platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFR-α), PDGFR-β, neuropilin-1, neuropilin-2, semaphorin 3A, and semaphorin 3F. Semiquantitative analysis was performed by two authors, who scored the intensity of tumor-cell and blood-vessel staining on a scale of 0 (no staining) to 3 (strong staining). A customized software analysis tool was used to determine the number of vessels, perimeter, the minor axis of best fitted ellipse (representative of vessel diameter), and the total surface covered by vascular spaces. The same method was used, with the substitution of either VEGFR-2 or neuropilin-2 labeling, to determine the proportion of vessels expressing these VEGF receptors (for details, see the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org).
Selection of Patients
We offered bevacizumab on a compassionate-use basis to patients who fulfilled the clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis type 2,16 had evidence of progressive vestibular schwannomas, and were considered poor candidates for surgery and radiation therapy or declined these treatments. Consecutive patients who met these criteria and had received at least one bevacizumab dose as of August 1, 2008, were included in the analysis.
Clinical Evaluations
The intervals for clinical evaluations were determined before treatment of the first patient. Baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and audiology were performed within 1 month before starting treatment. Clinical evaluation, which included a physical examination, complete blood count, blood chemical analysis, and urinalysis, was performed every 2 to 4 weeks during treatment. Tumor response was monitored with the use of serial MRI scanning at clinical visits at months 1, 3, and 6 and every 3 months thereafter. Tumor volumetric analysis was performed as described previously.17 To investigate whether tumor shrinkage might be related, in part, to a decrease in intratumoral vasogenic edema, we subsequently determined the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (a measure of the magnitude of diffusion of water molecules within tissue and a marker of edema on imaging with MRI18) within vestibular schwannomas at baseline. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) was performed in Patient 6 to evaluate changes in blood flow and vascular permeability after treatment.18 Hearing response was monitored with the use of serial audiologic evaluations, including determination of pure-tone thresholds and word-recognition scores (for details, see the Supplementary Appendix).19,20 Data regarding toxic effects were collected monthly during routine clinic visits, and adverse events were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0.
Definitions of Imaging and Hearing Responses
We established definitions of imaging and hearing responses after noting a clinical benefit in the first patient. An imaging response was defined as a decrease of at least 20% in tumor volume, as compared with the pretreatment baseline.21 Volumetric changes of 15% or 20% have been used to define response and progression in early-phase trials involving patients with plexiform neurofibromas associated with neurofibromatosis type 1.22,23
A hearing response was defined as a significant increase in the word-recognition score, as compared with the baseline score.24 Patients were eligible for a hearing response if their pretreatment word-recognition score allowed for hearing improvement above the upper limit of the critical-difference threshold (i.e., a word-recognition score of 94% or less). Patients with surgically disrupted auditory nerves were not eligible for a hearing response. We used published guidelines25 to determine significant differences between word-recognition scores to compare each patient's scores after treatment with baseline values.
Study Oversight
The institutional review board at Massachusetts General Hospital approved the retrospective chart review and tumor-specimen collections. All patients provided written informed consent for treatment. The authors vouch for the completeness and veracity of the data and data analyses. Bevacizumab was provided as part of clinical care; Genentech, the maker of bevacizumab, had no role in the study.
Statistical Analysis
For analyses of morphologic features, microvascular density, and measures of diameter and perimeter, we used Bartlett's test for the equality of multiple variances to analyze between-group differences in variance. Analysis-of-variance estimate models were then built and appropriate post hoc testing was performed on the basis of Bartlett's test results. For measures with equal variances, Tukey's test was used. For measures with unequal variances, the Games–Howell test was used. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
Results
Immunohistochemical Analyses
In normal peripheral nerves, the ligands VEGF, semaphorin 3A, semaphorin 3F, and the receptors VEGFR-2 and neuropilin-1 were consistently expressed in both Schwann cells and vascular endothelial cells; neuropilin-2 was seen in all Schwann cells but in less than 5% of blood vessels (Figure 1AFigure 1
Angiogenic Profile of Vestibular Schwannomas., and Fig. 1 in the Supplementary Appendix). In the schwannomas, tumor cells had expression patterns of VEGF, neuropilin-1, and neuropilin-2 that were similar to those in normal nerve. In contrast, VEGFR-2 was expressed in about half of all schwannomas, and semaphorin 3A and semaphorin 3F were expressed in only 20% of schwannomas and at reduced intensity (Figure 1A and 1B, and Fig. 2 in the Supplementary Appendix).VEGFR-2 was found in 32% of vessels in tumors associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 and in sporadic tumors. In contrast, all vessels expressed neuropilin-1 (similar to normal nerve), and about 10% of vessels expressed neuropilin-2 (Figure 1C). Most tumor cells showed little or no expression of PDGFR-α or PDGFR-β. More than 50% of tumor specimens expressed both PDGFR-α and PDGFR-β on the vascular endothelium, consistent with an angiogenic phenotype (Fig. 3 in the Supplementary Appendix).
Morphometric analysis revealed that schwannomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 showed a greater microvascular density (22 vessels per square millimeter) and a larger vessel diameter (mean, 14.2 μm), and perimeter (mean, 91 μm) than normal nerve (with 18 vessels per square millimeter and a mean vessel diameter of 7.9 μm and perimeter of 47 μm) (Figure 1D).
Patients
The baseline characteristics of the 10 patients in the study are shown in Table 1Table 1
Baseline Characteristics of the Patients and Outcomes after Treatment with Bevacizumab.. All patients were poor candidates for standard treatment, since eight were at high risk for complete hearing loss and one for bilateral lower cranial-nerve palsies, and one patient had declined surgery or radiation. Patients 1 through 5 had been treated previously with erlotinib chemotherapy26 but stopped treatment because of either toxic effects (Patient 1) or tumor growth (Patients 2 through 5).Treatment
Six men and four women with a median age of 25 years (range, 16 to 53) received intravenous bevacizumab at a dose of 5 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks. The median annual growth rate in tumor volume before treatment was 62% (range, 9 to 121). The median duration of treatment was 12 months (range, 3 to 19), and six patients were followed for at least 1 year. Six patients continued to be treated with bevacizumab at the end of the study. Patient 1 stopped treatment after 19 months because of slow growth of a vestibular schwannoma, which caused brain-stem compression; the tumor was subsequently resected. Patient 5 discontinued bevacizumab temporarily as she awaited surgical removal of a nonvestibular schwannoma. Patient 7 stopped bevacizumab after 3 months because of progressive growth of a spinal meningioma; he died of complications after surgery to resect the tumor 5 months later. Patient 8 stopped treatment after 8 months because of progressive growth of a vestibular schwannoma and hearing loss.
Imaging Response
Of the 10 tumors, 9 shrank after bevacizumab treatment, and 6 had an imaging response (Table 1, and Fig. 4 in the Supplementary Appendix). The median best response to treatment was 26% shrinkage (range, 44% shrinkage to 32% growth). Of six tumors that had an objective imaging response, the response was maintained in four tumors at the last imaging follow-up 11 to 16 months after the initiation of treatment. Three tumors remained stable (i.e., ranging from a 19% reduction to a 19% increase in volumetric growth, as compared with baseline) during bevacizumab treatment, and one patient had an increase in tumor volume of 32%.
A strong correlation was observed between the mean apparent diffusion coefficient at baseline within tumors and the percent decrease in volume at 3 months (Pearson's r correlation, −0.87; r2=0.75; P=0.001) (Figure 2AFigure 2
Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Measures during Treatment with Bevacizumab.). In the single patient with complete DCE-MRI data (Patient 6), a measure of blood flow and vascular permeability decreased by 68%, tumor blood volume decreased by 77%, tumor blood flow decreased by 51%, mean transit time decreased by 9%, and the average vessel size decreased by 70% at 3 months (Figure 2B). Twelve months after the initiation of treatment, measures of blood flow and vascular permeability continued to fall. Although the amount of gadolinium enhancement decreased over time, the enhancement pattern within vestibular schwannomas did not change noticeably during treatment (Figure 2C).Hearing Response
Seven patients were considered eligible for a hearing response. Of the other three patients, two had normal hearing ipsilateral to index vestibular schwannomas at baseline (and thus could not improve), and one had undergone surgical resection of both auditory nerves. A hearing response was observed in four of seven eligible patients (57%) (Fig. 5 in the Supplementary Appendix). The hearing benefit of bevacizumab was large for Patient 2, whose word-recognition score increased from 8% to 98%, and for Patient 3, whose word-recognition score increased from 34% to 76%. Both Patient 2 and Patient 3 regained useful hearing, and they were able to resume school and work, respectively. Patient 4, whose word-recognition score increased from 0% to 40%, reported better speech-reading (lip-reading), and Patient 5, whose word-recognition score increased from 76% to 94%, also reported improvement in face-to-face conversation. Patients with a hearing response showed progressive improvement in word recognition, which began about 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment and continued to improve for as long as 16 months (Fig. 5 in the Supplementary Appendix). Among the four patients who had a hearing response, the result was durable for 11 to 16 months.
Of the three patients who did not have a hearing response, Patient 1 had had no word recognition for at least 8 months before treatment, Patient 8 had a decline in word recognition (44% to 16%) after starting treatment despite initial tumor shrinkage, and Patient 10 had stable hearing despite a sustained reduction in tumor volume. Although Patient 1 did not have a hearing or an imaging response, he had clinical improvement that may have been related to treatment. Before treatment, he was receiving hospice care because of intractable headache and vomiting associated with critical brain-stem compression. Within 4 weeks after starting therapy, his headaches and vomiting resolved, and he returned to high school. He remained clinically improved for 19 months of treatment but then required resection of his vestibular schwannoma for tumor growth. Four of five patients reported subjective improvement in baseline tinnitus, and one noted no change.
Adverse Effects
A total of 21 grade 1 or 2 adverse events were reported, including increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase (4 events) and alanine aminotransferase (3 events), proteinuria (3 events), hypertension (2 events), delayed wound healing (2 events), hyperkalemia (2 events), hyperbilirubinemia (2 events), uterine bleeding (1 event), hypocalcemia (1 event), hypophosphatemia (1 event), and hypomagnesemia (1 event). Two patients had infected vascular access ports requiring removal. In this small sample of patients, no patients had thromboembolic events, hemorrhage, congestive heart failure, gastrointestinal perforation, or reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy. No patient discontinued treatment because of adverse events, and no grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported.
Discussion
Our study showed that bevacizumab treatment was followed by clinically meaningful hearing improvement, tumor-volume reduction, or both in some, but not all, patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 who were at risk for complete hearing loss or brain-stem compression from growing vestibular schwannomas. Our findings confirm that VEGF is produced by schwannoma tumor cells10-14 and suggests that this growth factor may participate in tumor growth and hearing loss associated with vestibular schwannomas. The imaging findings indicate that the mean apparent diffusion coefficient at baseline might be a potential marker for volumetric response to anti-VEGF therapy. The DCE-MRI data, though limited, further suggest that bevacizumab normalizes the function of tumor vessels and potentially restores a more normal blood–nerve barrier.
These findings have implications for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and for the study of vestibular schwannoma biology. First, the reduced expression of VEGFR-2 on tumor vessels suggested that interfering with the function of VEGF receptors might be less effective than targeting VEGF directly, which prompted our choice of bevacizumab for treatment. Our data suggest that the current understanding of VEGF-mediated angiogenesis — that VEGF is secreted by tumor cells and then binds to and activates VEGFR-2 on endothelial cells — may be more complex in schwannomas, in which vessels express different VEGF receptors. Further work is needed to understand the role of the semaphorin–neuropilin axis in these tumors.
Second, VEGF inhibition can lead to modest but relevant decreases in the volume of vestibular schwannomas. This effect is notable, given the lack of sensitivity of benign nervous-system tumors to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Third, in some patients, VEGF inhibition can lead to a relatively rapid (<12 weeks) improvement in hearing, as reflected by word-recognition scores, with sustained improvement for up to 16 months. Observational studies have shown that word-recognition scores deteriorate over time in patients with vestibular schwannomas and that significant improvement is not expected.27 We posit that improvement is due to a reduction in intraneural edema, as well as tumor shrinkage. This assertion is supported by the time course of hearing improvement, the correlation between the mean apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor shrinkage, and the changes in intratumoral vascular permeability, as seen on DCE-MRI. This mechanism is consistent with the vascular-normalization hypothesis28 and previous studies of anti-VEGF therapy in malignant brain tumors.18,29
To date, four of our six patients with an imaging response and all four patients with a hearing response have continued to respond to therapy for 11 to 16 months. This suggests that response to anti-VEGF therapy can be durable for progressive vestibular schwannomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2. In contrast, the median time to progression for recurrent glioblastoma treated with antiangiogenic therapy is about 16 weeks.18,30 Patients with benign tumors who benefit from anti-VEGF therapy present unique clinical challenges: they may have prolonged survival during which unanticipated delayed toxic effects could become manifest, and the implications of stopping therapy are unknown, with the potential for rebound tumor growth when monoclonal treatment is stopped.18
Although the need for an effective medical therapy for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 is clear, the risk of toxic effects deserves careful consideration. In our preliminary experience, toxic effects were limited to grade 1 or 2 adverse events during follow-up of up to 16 months, which is not long in comparison with the expected survival of these young patients. The absence of many common toxic effects of bevacizumab in our patients may have reflected their relative youth, the lack of other medical conditions, and the small number of patients who were treated.
Our results show an interesting biologic effect of bevacizumab treatment on vestibular schwannomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2. However, we treated only patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 who were at imminent risk for severe neurologic consequences and not those with less advanced symptoms or patients with sporadic vestibular schwannomas. Additional research will be necessary to determine the optimal drug regimen, duration, and adverse-effect profile for long-term anti-VEGF therapy for vestibular schwannomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2.
Supported by the Harvard Medical School Center for Neurofibromatosis and Allied Disorders; Neurofibromatosis, Inc., New England; the Children's Tumor Foundation; a grant (NF050202, to Dr. Plotkin) from the Neurofibromatosis Research Program of the Department of Defense; a Claflin Award (to Dr. di Tomaso); grants (P01NS024279, to Dr. Stemmer-Rachamimov; and P01CA80124, to Dr. Jain) from the National Institutes of Health; and grants from the Federal Share/National Cancer Institute Proton Beam Program (to Drs. di Tomaso and Jain).
Dr. Plotkin reports receiving consulting fees from Novartis and grant support from Pfizer; Dr. Sorensen, receiving grant support from AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Schering-Plough, Genentech, Novartis, Takeda/Millennium, and Siemens Medical Solutions and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare, Genentech, Mitsubishi Pharma, Novartis, and Takeda/Millennium; and Dr. Jain, receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Dyax, Enlight, and Millennium and lecture fees from Roche Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer, having an equity interest in Enlight and SynDevRx, and receiving grant support from AstraZeneca and Dyax. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
This article (10.1056/NEJMoa0902579) was published on July 8, 2009, at NEJM.org.
We thank Marybeth Singh for her clinical care and Drs. Meiyun Wang, Poe-jou Chen, and Dominique Jennings for their work in analyzing the imaging data.
Source Information
From the Departments of Neurology (S.R.P.), Pathology (A.O.S.-R.), and Radiation Oncology (T.P.P., A.T., R.K.J., E.T.); the Cancer Center (S.R.P.); the Neurosurgical Service (F.G.B.); and the A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (A.G.S.) — all at Massachusetts General Hospital; and the Department of Audiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (C.H.) — all in Boston.
Address reprint requests to Dr. Plotkin at Yawkey 9E, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, or at splotkin@partners.org.
- References
References
1
Evans DG ,Moran A ,King A ,Saeed S ,Gurusinghe N ,Ramsden R . Incidence of vestibular schwannoma and neurofibromatosis 2 in the North West of England over a 10-year period: higher incidence than previously thought. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:93-97
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline2
Samii M ,Gerganov V ,Samii A . Improved preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid approach in a series of 200 patients. J Neurosurg 2006;105:527-535
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline3
Flickinger JC ,Kondziolka D ,Niranjan A ,Lunsford LD . Results of acoustic neuroma radiosurgery: an analysis of 5 years' experience using current methods. J Neurosurg 2001;94:1-6
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline4
Brackmann DE ,Fayad JN ,Slattery WH III , et al. Early proactive management of vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2. Neurosurgery 2001;49:274-280
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline5
Combs SE ,Volk S ,Schulz-Ertner D ,Huber PE ,Thilmann C ,Debus J . Management of acoustic neuromas with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT): long-term results in 106 patients treated in a single institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;63:75-81
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline6
Samii M ,Matthies C ,Tatagiba M . Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): auditory and facial nerve function after resection of 120 vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 2. Neurosurgery 1997;40:696-705
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline7
Folkman J . Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med 1971;285:1182-1186
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline8
Carmeliet P ,Jain RK . Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature 2000;407:249-257
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline9
Nagy JA ,Benjamin L ,Zeng H ,Dvorak AM ,Dvorak HF . Vascular permeability, vascular hyperpermeability and angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 2008;11:109-119
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline10
Brieger J ,Bedavanija A ,Lehr HA ,Maurer J ,Mann WJ . Expression of angiogenic growth factors in acoustic neurinoma. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2003;123:1040-1045
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline11
Caye-Thomasen P ,Baandrup L ,Jacobsen GK ,Thomsen J ,Stangerup SE . Immunohistochemical demonstration of vascular endothelial growth factor in vestibular schwannomas correlates to tumor growth rate. Laryngoscope 2003;113:2129-2134
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline12
Caye-Thomasen P ,Werther K ,Nalla A , et al. VEGF and VEGF receptor-1 concentration in vestibular schwannoma homogenates correlates to tumor growth rate. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:98-101
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline13
Saito K ,Kato M ,Susaki N ,Nagatani T ,Nagasaka T ,Yoshida J . Expression of Ki-67 antigen and vascular endothelial growth factor in sporadic and neurofibromatosis type 2-associated schwannomas. Clin Neuropathol 2003;22:30-34
Web of Science | Medline14
Uesaka T ,Shono T ,Suzuki SO , et al. Expression of VEGF and its receptor genes in intracranial schwannomas. J Neurooncol 2007;83:259-266
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline15
Takamiya Y ,Brem H ,Ojeifo J ,Mineta T ,Martuza RL . AGM-1470 inhibits the growth of human glioblastoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Neurosurgery 1994;34:869-875
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline16
Mulvihill JJ ,Parry DM ,Sherman JL ,Pikus A ,Kaiser-Kupfer MI ,Eldridge R . NIH conference: neurofibromatosis 1 (Recklinghausen disease) and neurofibromatosis 2 (bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis): an update. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:39-52
Web of Science | Medline17
Harris GJ ,Plotkin SR ,MacCollin M , et al. Three-dimensional volumetrics for tracking vestibular schwannoma growth in neurofibromatosis type II. Neurosurgery 2008;62:1314-1319
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline18
Batchelor TT ,Sorensen AG ,di Tomaso E , et al. AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell 2007;11:83-95
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline19
Monsell EM . New and revised reporting guidelines from the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:176-178
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline20
Hirsh IJ ,Davis H ,Silverman SR ,Reynolds EG ,Eldert E ,Benson RW . Development of materials for speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord 1952;17:321-337
Medline21
Plotkin SR ,Halpin C ,Blakely JO , et al. Suggested response criteria for phase II antitumor drug studies for neurofibromatosis type 2 related vestibular schwannoma. J Neurooncol 2009;93:61-77
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline22
Babovic-Vuksanovic D ,Ballman K ,Michels V , et al. Phase II trial of pirfenidone in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology 2006;67:1860-1862
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline23
Babovic-Vuksanovic D ,Widemann BC ,Dombi E , et al. Phase I trial of pirfenidone in children with neurofibromatosis 1 and plexiform neurofibromas. Pediatr Neurol 2007;36:293-300
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline24
Thornton AR ,Raffin MJ . Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res 1978;21:507-518
Medline25
Halpin C ,Rauch SD . Using audiometric thresholds and word recognition in a treatment study. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:110-116
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline26
Plotkin SR ,Singh MA ,O'Donnell CC ,Harris GJ ,McClatchey AI ,Halpin C . Audiologic and radiographic response of NF2-related vestibular schwannoma to erlotinib therapy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2008;5:487-491
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline27
Caye-Thomasen P ,Dethloff T ,Hansen S ,Stangerup SE ,Thomsen J . Hearing in patients with intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas. Audiol Neurootol 2007;12:1-12
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline28
Jain RK . Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 2005;307:58-62
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline29
Kamoun WS ,Ley CD ,Farrar CT , et al. Edema control by cediranib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted kinase inhibitor, prolongs survival despite persistent brain tumor growth in mice. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:2542-2552
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline30
Fine HA ,Figg WD ,Jaeckle K , et al. Phase II trial of the antiangiogenic agent thalidomide in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:708-715
Web of Science | Medline
- Citing Articles (38)
Citing Articles
1
G K Eminowicz, R Raman, J Conibear, P N Plowman. (2012) Bevacizumab treatment for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type two: report of two cases, including responses after prior gamma knife and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition therapy. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 126:01, 79-82
CrossRef2
Jong Dae Lee, Jae Yong Lee, Byoung Joon Baek, Byung Don Lee, Yoon Woo Koh, Won-Sang Lee, Yu-Jin Lee, Byoung-Mog Kwon. (2012) The inhibitory effect of honokiol, a natural plant product, on vestibular schwannoma cells. The Laryngoscope 122:1, 162-166
CrossRef3
Ashok R. Asthagiri, Katherine E. Warren, Russell R. Lonser. 2012. Brain tumors associated with neurofibromatosis. , 588-599.
CrossRef4
Jaishri O. Blakeley, D. Gareth Evans, John Adler, Derald Brackmann, Ruihong Chen, Rosalie E. Ferner, C. Oliver Hanemann, Gordon Harris, Susan M. Huson, Abraham Jacob, Michel Kalamarides, Matthias A. Karajannis, Bruce R. Korf, Victor-Felix Mautner, Andrea I. McClatchey, Harry Miao, Scott R. Plotkin, William Slattery, Anat O. Stemmer-Rachamimov, D. Bradley Welling, Patrick Y. Wen, Brigitte Widemann, Kim Hunter-Schaedle, Marco Giovannini. (2012) Consensus recommendations for current treatments and accelerating clinical trials for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 158A:1, 24-41
CrossRef5
Anita Villani, David Malkin, Uri Tabori. (2011) Syndromes Predisposing to Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumors: Lessons Learned and New Promises. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
CrossRef6
Rick A. Friedman, John C. Goddard, Eric P. Wilkinson, Marc S. Schwartz, William H. Slattery, Jose N. Fayad, Derald E. Brackmann. (2011) Hearing Preservation With the Middle Cranial Fossa Approach for Neurofibromatosis Type 2. Otology & Neurotology 32:9, 1530-1537
CrossRef7
Simone L. Ardern-Holmes, Kathryn N. North. (2011) Therapeutics for Childhood Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Type 2. Current Treatment Options in Neurology 13:6, 529-543
CrossRef8
Rishi S Kotecha, Elaine M Pascoe, Elisabeth J Rushing, Lucy B Rorke-Adams, Ted Zwerdling, Xing Gao, Xin Li, Stephanie Greene, Abbas Amirjamshidi, Seung-Ki Kim, Marco A Lima, Po-Cheng Hung, Fayçal Lakhdar, Nirav Mehta, Yuguang Liu, B Indira Devi, B Jayanand Sudhir, Morten Lund-Johansen, Flemming Gjerris, Catherine H Cole, Nicholas G Gottardo. (2011) Meningiomas in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. The Lancet Oncology 12:13, 1229-1239
CrossRef9
Michel Kalamarides, Maria T. Acosta, Dusica Babovic-Vuksanovic, Olli Carpen, Karen Cichowski, D. Gareth Evans, Filippo Giancotti, C. Oliver Hanemann, David Ingram, Alison C. Lloyd, Debra A. Mayes, Ludwine Messiaen, Helen Morrison, Kathryn North, Roger Packer, Duojia Pan, Anat Stemmer-Rachamimov, Meena Upadhyaya, David Viskochil, Margret R. Wallace, Kim Hunter-Schaedle, Nancy Ratner. (2011) Neurofibromatosis 2011: a report of the Children’s Tumor Foundation Annual Meeting. Acta Neuropathologica
CrossRef10
Brendan Fong, Garni Barkhoudarian, Patrick Pezeshkian, Andrew T. Parsa, Quinton Gopen, Isaac Yang. (2011) The molecular biology and novel treatments of vestibular schwannomas. Journal of Neurosurgery 115:5, 906-914
CrossRef11
M. L. Bush, J. Oblinger, V. Brendel, G. Santarelli, J. Huang, E. M. Akhmametyeva, S. S. Burns, J. Wheeler, J. Davis, C. W. Yates, A. R. Chaudhury, S. Kulp, C.-S. Chen, L.-S. Chang, D. B. Welling, A. Jacob. (2011) AR42, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, as a potential therapy for vestibular schwannomas and meningiomas. Neuro-Oncology 13:9, 983-999
CrossRef12
J.- C. Soria, J. Y. Blay, J. P. Spano, X. Pivot, Y. Coscas, D. Khayat. (2011) Added value of molecular targeted agents in oncology. Annals of Oncology 22:8, 1703-1716
CrossRef13
Rachael E. Hornigold, John F. Golding, Robin E. Ferner, Rosalie E. Ferner. (2011) Neurofibromatosis 2: A novel risk factor for hypertension?. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 155:7, 1721-1722
CrossRef14
Sylwia Ammoun, C. Oliver Hanemann. (2011) Emerging therapeutic targets in schwannomas and other merlin-deficient tumors. Nature Reviews Neurology 7:7, 392-399
CrossRef15
Peter Carmeliet, Rakesh K. Jain. (2011) Principles and mechanisms of vessel normalization for cancer and other angiogenic diseases. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 10:6, 417-427
CrossRef16
Philip V. Theodosopoulos, Myles L. Pensak. (2011) Contemporary management of acoustic neuromas. The Laryngoscope 121:6, 1133-1137
CrossRef17
Michael E Baser, Jan M Friedman, Harry Joe, Andrew Shenton, Andrew J Wallace, Richard T Ramsden, D Gareth R Evans. (2011) Empirical development of improved diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis 2. Genetics in Medicine 13:6, 576-581
CrossRef18
Peter Carmeliet, Rakesh K. Jain. (2011) Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473:7347, 298-307
CrossRef19
W. J. Bowers, X. O. Breakefield, M. Sena-Esteves. (2011) Genetic therapy for the nervous system. Human Molecular Genetics 20:R1, R28-R41
CrossRef20
Eudocia C. Quant, Patrick Y. Wen. (2011) Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology. Current Oncology Reports 13:1, 50-56
CrossRef21
Tracey A DeLucia, Kaleb Yohay, Roger F Widmann. (2011) Orthopaedic aspects of neurofibromatosis: update. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 23:1, 46-52
CrossRef22
Susan M. Huson, Maria T. Acosta, Allan J. Belzberg, Andre Bernards, Jonathan Chernoff, Karen Cichowski, D. Gareth Evans, Rosalie E. Ferner, Marco Giovannini, Bruce R. Korf, Robert Listernick, Kathryn N. North, Roger J. Packer, Luis F. Parada, Juha Peltonen, Vijaya Ramesh, Karlyne M. Reilly, John W. Risner, Elizabeth K. Schorry, Meena Upadhyaya, David H. Viskochil, Yuan Zhu, Kim Hunter-Schaedle, Filippo G. Giancotti. (2011) Back to the future: Proceedings from the 2010 NF Conference. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 155:2, 307-321
CrossRef23
Michael E. Sughrue, Andrea H. Yeung, Martin J. Rutkowski, Steven W. Cheung, Andrew T. Parsa. (2011) Molecular biology of familial and sporadic vestibular schwannomas: implications for novel therapeutics. Journal of Neurosurgery 114:2, 359-366
CrossRef24
Ka-Loh Li, Giovanni Buonaccorsi, Gerard Thompson, John R. Cain, Amy Watkins, David Russell, Salman Qureshi, D. Gareth Evans, Simon K. Lloyd, Xiaoping Zhu, Alan Jackson. (2011) An improved coverage and spatial resolution-using dual injection dynamic contrast-enhanced (ICE-DICE) MRI: A novel dynamic contrast-enhanced technique for cerebral tumors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicinen/a-n/a
CrossRef25
V.- F. Mautner, R. Nguyen, R. Knecht, C. Bokemeyer. (2010) Radiographic regression of vestibular schwannomas induced by bevacizumab treatment: sustain under continuous drug application and rebound after drug discontinuation. Annals of Oncology 21:11, 2294-2295
CrossRef26
Lan Kluwe, Victor-F Mautner. 2010. Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Clinics and Genetics. .
CrossRef27
Stéphane Goutagny, Michel Kalamarides. (2010) Meningiomas and neurofibromatosis. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 99:3, 341-347
CrossRef28
D. O. Bates. (2010) Vascular endothelial growth factors and vascular permeability. Cardiovascular Research 87:2, 262-271
CrossRef29
A. Patrinou, P. Malindretos, G. Koutroubas, N. Anagnostou, E. Argiraki, C. Syrganis. (2010) A rare retroperitoneal schwannoma in a patient with neurofibromatosis Type 2. NDT Plus 3:3, 288-290
CrossRef30
Yihai Cao. (2010) Angiogenesis: What can it offer for future medicine?. Experimental Cell Research 316:8, 1304-1308
CrossRef31
Martin Nue Møller, Kim Werther, Amarnadh Nalla, Sven-Eric Stangerup, Jens Thomsen, Thorkild C. Bøg-Hansen, Hans Jørgen Nielsen, Per Cayé-Thomasen. (2010) Angiogenesis in vestibular schwannomas: Expression of extracellular matrix factors MMP-2, MMP-9, and TIMP-1. The Laryngoscope 120:4, 657-662
CrossRef32
Barbara Jamróz, Magdalena Lachowska, Kazimierz Niemczyk, Krzysztof Morawski, Robert Bartoszewicz, Katarzyna Pierchała. (2010) Możliwości zachowania słuchu u pacjenta z neurofibromatozą typu 2 – opis przypadku. Otolaryngologia Polska 64:2, 114-117
CrossRef33
Joseph L. Kissil, Jaishri O. Blakeley, Rosalie E. Ferner, Susan M. Huson, Michel Kalamarides, Victor-Felix Mautner, Frank McCormick, Helen Morrison, Roger Packer, Vijaya Ramesh, Nancy Ratner, Katherine A. Rauen, David A. Stevenson, Kim Hunter-Schaedle, Kathryn North. (2010) What's new in neurofibromatosis? Proceedings from the 2009 NF Conference: New Frontiers. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 152A:2, 269-283
CrossRef34
RICARDO J. KOMOTAR, ROBERT M. STARKE, MICHAEL B. SISTI, E. SANDER CONNOLLY. (2009) The Role of Bevacizumab in Hearing Preservation and Tumor Volume Control in Patients With Vestibular Schwannomas. Neurosurgery 65:6, N12
CrossRef35
Andrea H. Yeung, Michael E. Sughrue, Ari J. Kane, Tarik Tihan, Steven W. Cheung, Andrew T. Parsa. (2009) Radiobiology of vestibular schwannomas: mechanisms of radioresistance and potential targets for therapeutic sensitization. Neurosurgical FOCUS 27:6, E2
CrossRef36
L. Kluwe, V.-F. Mautner. (2009) Neurofibromatose Typ 2. medizinische genetik 21:4, 532-538
CrossRef37
(2009) Hearing Improvement after Bevacizumab for Neurofibromatosis Type 2. New England Journal of Medicine 361:18, 1809-1811
Full Text38
JAMIE TALAN. (2009) Hearing Improves in Neurofibromatosis Patients Given Bevacizumab. Neurology Today 9:17, 1,6
CrossRef
- Letters
