Original Article

Defibrillator Implantation Early after Myocardial Infarction

Gerhard Steinbeck, M.D., Dietrich Andresen, M.D., Karlheinz Seidl, M.D., Johannes Brachmann, M.D., Ellen Hoffmann, M.D., Dariusz Wojciechowski, M.D., Zdzisława Kornacewicz-Jach, M.D., Beata Sredniawa, M.D., Géza Lupkovics, M.D., Franz Hofgärtner, M.D., Andrzej Lubinski, M.D., Mårten Rosenqvist, M.D., Alphonsus Habets, Ph.D., Karl Wegscheider, Ph.D., and Jochen Senges, M.D. for the IRIS Investigators

N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1427-1436October 8, 2009DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901889

Abstract

Background

The rate of death, including sudden cardiac death, is highest early after a myocardial infarction. Yet current guidelines do not recommend the use of an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) within 40 days after a myocardial infarction for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. We tested the hypothesis that patients at increased risk who are treated early with an ICD will live longer than those who receive optimal medical therapy alone.

Methods

This randomized, prospective, open-label, investigator-initiated, multicenter trial registered 62,944 unselected patients with myocardial infarction. Of this total, 898 patients were enrolled 5 to 31 days after the event if they met certain clinical criteria: a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%) and a heart rate of 90 or more beats per minute on the first available electrocardiogram (ECG) (criterion 1: 602 patients), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (≥150 beats per minute) during Holter monitoring (criterion 2: 208 patients), or both criteria (88 patients). Of the 898 patients, 445 were randomly assigned to treatment with an ICD and 453 to medical therapy alone.

Results

During a mean follow-up of 37 months, 233 patients died: 116 patients in the ICD group and 117 patients in the control group. Overall mortality was not reduced in the ICD group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.35; P=0.78). There were fewer sudden cardiac deaths in the ICD group than in the control group (27 vs. 60; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.00; P=0.049), but the number of nonsudden cardiac deaths was higher (68 vs. 39; hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.84; P=0.001). Hazard ratios were similar among the three groups of patients categorized according to the enrollment criteria they met (criterion 1, criterion 2, or both).

Conclusions

Prophylactic ICD therapy did not reduce overall mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and clinical features that placed them at increased risk. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00157768.)

Media in This Article

Figure 1Cumulative Risk of Death from Any Cause According to Study Group.
Figure 2Hazard Ratios for Death from Any Cause in Selected Subgroups of Patients.
Article

Despite the general improvement in outcomes among survivors of acute myocardial infarction the rate of death, including sudden cardiac death, remains highest in the weeks after the event.1,2 Sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias accounts for approximately 20 to 50% of all deaths in this population. 3-5 Therefore, prevention of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction remains an important goal. With the exception of beta-blockers, antiarrhythmic drugs do not reduce this risk. Several randomized trials have shown that an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) can reduce mortality both among patients who have had sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias6 and among selected patients who have a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) without ventricular arrhythmias.7,8 However, guidelines based on the results of these trials — including one that showed a neutral effect of defibrillator implantation early after myocardial infarction9 — recommend that implantation of an ICD for the primary prevention of sudden death be withheld for at least 40 days after an acute myocardial infarction.

The Immediate Risk Stratification Improves Survival (IRIS) trial was based on the hypothesis that early implantation of an ICD, as compared with optimal medical therapy, would improve survival among patients with acute myocardial infarction and predefined markers of elevated risk. LVEF, heart rate (as determined on the admission electrocardiogram [ECG]), and the occurrence of rapid, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were the factors used to determine each patient's level of risk.3,10-16

Methods

Patient Population and Randomization

Between June 9, 1999, and October 15, 2007, the records of 62,944 patients who had an acute myocardial infarction with or without ST-segment elevation were collected in a registry from which our study population would be derived. Exclusion criteria consisted of the presence of ventricular arrhythmias that occurred before the index infarction or more than 48 hours after the event and that required treatment, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV drug-refractory heart failure, an interval of more than 31 days between myocardial infarction and presentation, no ECG documentation within the first 48 hours after the onset of chest pain, an indication for coronary-artery bypass surgery before study entry, a psychiatric disorder, severe concomitant disease, a history of poor compliance with treatment, either the inability to participate in this trial or current participation in another trial, and an unstable clinical condition. After 26,445 patients had been excluded on the basis of these criteria, 36,499 were screened for inclusion.

Patients had to meet at least one of two criteria for inclusion. Criterion 1 was a heart rate of 90 beats per minute or more on the first available ECG (obtained within 48 hours after the myocardial infarction) and an LVEF of 40% or less (on one of days 5 to 31 after myocardial infarction). Criterion 2 was nonsustained ventricular tachycardia consisting of three or more consecutive ventricular premature beats during Holter ECG monitoring, with a heart rate of 150 beats per minute or more (on days 5 to 31).

A total of 1311 eligible patients, 18 to 80 years of age, met one or both criteria for inclusion in the study; 409 patients declined to participate, and written consent was missing for 4. The remaining 898 patients (86% of whom were still in the hospital) were randomly assigned to a study treatment — 445 to receive an ICD and 453 to receive medical therapy alone — at a mean (±SD) of 13±7 days after infarction.

Study Design

The primary objective of IRIS was to assess overall mortality in the two patient groups; secondary end points included sudden cardiac death, nonsudden cardiac death, and noncardiac death. The design of this European investigator-initiated trial has been described previously.17 A group-sequential design according to O'Brien and Fleming,18 with three interim analyses, after 50, 100, and 150 events, was selected initially and was described in the study protocol. However, in its first session, the data and safety monitoring board advised us to replace this strategy with the corresponding Lan–DeMets approach,19,20 which is based on the same alpha-spending function, to allow deviations from the fixed numbers of events. On January 9, 2005, this change was made as an addendum to the protocol.

The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committees at all 92 participating centers, and all the patients provided written informed consent. To increase recruitment, two modifications were made during the course of the study: patients with non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction were included as of June 1, 2002; and the qualifying heart rate on the first available ECG as part of criterion 1 was reduced from 100 or more to 90 or more beats per minute beginning on October 14, 2004.

Of the patients randomly assigned to the ICD group, 78% received Medtronic models of the GEM family, 11% Micro Jewel II, 8% Maximo, and 3% Marquis. Of this group, 81% received a single-chamber ICD, and a Fidelis lead was used in 21% of the patients. The protocol required two consecutive terminations of ventricular fibrillation at 10 J below the maximum ICD output and single-chamber ventricular demand (VVI) pacing at 40 beats per minute, with maximal shock energy turned on for treatment of ventricular fibrillation (threshold for treatment, ≥200 beats per minute) and treatment for ventricular tachycardia turned off initially.

After discharge, patients were followed at intervals of 3 and 6 months after randomization and at 6-month intervals thereafter.

The academic authors designed the trial, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the report. The sponsors (Medtronic and AstraZeneca) were informed about the study outcome after the evaluation had been completed. Apart from an opportunity to review and provide comments about the predefined final-analysis plan and the manuscript, neither sponsor had a role in the study design, data analysis, or interpretation of the results.

Classification of Deaths

An adverse-event committee that was unaware of the treatment assignments classified the 233 fatal events as definitely cardiac (148 cases), unknown (46 cases), or definitely noncardiac (39 cases) and as sudden or nonsudden. For the purpose of analysis, patients whose events were classified as both definitely cardiac and unknown were combined under the category of presumably cardiac death. A death, either in the hospital or out of the hospital, was assumed to be a sudden cardiac death if a cardiac death occurred within minutes after the onset of acute symptoms, resulted from a documented cardiac arrhythmia, or was not witnessed and occurred unexpectedly and without recognizable causes (e.g., during sleep). Furthermore, a death was classified as a sudden cardiac death regardless of the underlying condition.

Statistical Analysis

According to the plan decided upon before unblinding, data collection and statistical analysis were executed by Oncology Services Europe, an independent data-coordinating center, which used SAS software, version 9.1.3. Statistical analysis was independently repeated by one of the authors with full access to the data. Subdistribution hazard analyses were performed using R software (cmprsk package), and baseline comparisons were carried out by means of Fisher's exact tests, chi-square tests, or Wilcoxon tests, as appropriate. The primary analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis and included all randomized patients from whom written informed consent had been obtained. The cumulative risks of death from any cause were estimated separately for each treatment group with the use of the Kaplan–Meier procedure21 and were compared between groups with the use of the log-rank test.22 Cumulative mortality by year and annual rates were calculated with the use of an inverse Kaplan–Meier analysis.

For sample-size calculation, 2-year survival rates were assumed to be 70.6% in the control group and 79.4% in the ICD group (a relative-risk reduction of approximately 30% in the latter group). To calculate the required number of patients, we assumed an alpha error of 5% (two-sided), a beta error of 20%, a 30-month recruitment period, and a minimum follow-up of 2 years. With a lost-to-follow-up rate of 1% per year and taking into account the group-sequential design, the required number of patients in each therapy group was 350. Because the percentage of screened patients who were excluded was unexpectedly high, the recruitment time was more than doubled.

On December 13, 2005, because of a lower-than-expected mortality rate, the data and safety monitoring board advised us to increase the number of patients to 900 and to extend follow-up until the last patient had been in the study for 1 year. These changes were agreed to by the steering committee, and the group-sequential procedure was adapted by replacing the fixed O'Brien and Fleming strategy by a Lan–DeMets approach.19,20 However, the alpha-spending function was not changed. The final primary analysis was performed with the use of ADDPLAN, version 4.0.23

Calculation of hazard ratios and subgroup analyses with respect to the primary end point were performed on the basis of Cox proportional-hazards models. The proportional-hazards assumption was tested on the basis of Schoenfeld residuals. Subgroup analyses were performed one by one, with the use of the corresponding interaction test for comparison of the treatment effect between subgroups. Thirteen subgroup analyses were prespecified, and one post hoc subgroup analysis was added (for the effect of amiodarone). Two of these subgroup analyses (NYHA class and use or nonuse of amiodarone) involved information collected at discharge and thus were based on data from the patients who were still in the study when they left the hospital.

Since the causes of death represented competing risks, introducing bias in the Kaplan–Meier analysis, these were analyzed on the basis of proportional-subdistribution-hazard models.24 Hazard ratios for the subdistribution models and P values for interaction are reported in the same way as the results of the Cox proportional-hazards models.

Results

The baseline demographic characteristics of the two randomized groups were well balanced, although diabetes and left bundle-branch block were slightly more frequent in the ICD group (P=0.03 and P=0.05, respectively) (Table 1Table 1Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients, According to Study Group.).

At discharge, the NYHA class could be assessed in 885 of the surviving patients and was judged to be class I in 247 patients (28%), class II in 531 (60%), and class III in 106 (12%); the class changed to IV in 1 patient (0.1%). Discharge medications in the ICD group and the control group included beta-blockers (in 97.1% and 95.3% of patients, respectively), angiotensin-converting–enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (90.9% and 91.1%), antiplatelet agents (96.1% and 95.8%), and statins (91.6% and 91.5%), whereas use of antiarrhythmic drugs (mainly amiodarone) was slightly more frequent in the control group (17.4%, vs. 13.4% in the ICD group; P=0.11).

Risk of Death and Effects of the ICD

Figure 1Figure 1Cumulative Risk of Death from Any Cause According to Study Group. shows the cumulative risk of death from any cause for the two patient groups. During an average follow-up of 37 months (range, 0 to 106), 117 patients in the control group died and 116 patients in the ICD group died. The cumulative death rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 12.5%, 18.2%, and 22.9%, respectively, in the control group and 10.6%, 15.4%, and 22.4%, respectively, in the ICD group. No significant difference in survival was detected between the two treatment groups (P=0.76, and P=0.78 after adjustment for interim analyses, by the log-rank test); the hazard ratio for death in the ICD group was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.35; P=0.15 by the test of proportional-hazards assumption).

Figure 2Figure 2Hazard Ratios for Death from Any Cause in Selected Subgroups of Patients. shows the hazard ratios for subgroups of interest. As for the overall study population, a neutral effect of the ICD on overall mortality is seen in all three prespecified subgroups (patients meeting criterion 1 only, those meeting criterion 2 only, and those meeting both criteria).

Figure 3Figure 3Cumulative Risk of Cardiac Death, According to Study Group. and Table 2Table 2Causes of Death in the Study Groups. show the relationship between ICD therapy and the cause of death. There were fewer sudden cardiac deaths in the ICD group than in the control group (27 vs. 60) (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.00; P=0.049) (Figure 3A). However, this decrease is paralleled by an increase in nonsudden cardiac death in the ICD group as compared with the control group (68 vs. 39) (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.84; P=0.001) (Figure 3B). The effects were almost identical in the three predefined subgroups of patients based on the inclusion criteria (interaction, P=0.99 or P=0.71 for sudden or nonsudden cardiac death, respectively) (Table 2).

Of the 445 patients in the ICD group, 415 actually received the ICD system. Thirty patients did not receive an ICD: 14 patients withdrew their consent, 11 refused ICD implantation, and 5 died before implantation could take place. In 378 patients (91.1%), implantation was performed during the hospitalization for the index infarction. In one patient, the inserted lead became entangled in the tricuspid valve and was removed surgically. In 14 patients, the ICD was explanted or permanently deactivated during follow-up, at a median of 6.8 months after implantation. In summary, at study termination there were 45 patients without an ICD, as opposed to 39 patients in the control group who received an ICD at a median of 7.6 months after randomization.

Of the 415 patients who received an ICD as assigned during the study, a total of 65 (15.7%) had 76 clinically significant complications associated with ICD therapy that required hospitalization, surgical correction, or intravenous drug administration: in 19 patients (4.6%) during the post-implantation period (up to 30 days after implantation), and in 48 patients (11.6%) during follow-up. These complications included lead-related problems that required surgical revision in 10 patients, 4 of whom underwent replacement of Fidelis leads.

Seven patients in the ICD group died during the post-implantation period (within 30 days after implantation) owing to myocardial reinfarction in four patients and heart failure in three. One of them died during implantation. Within 30 days after randomization, 9 patients in the ICD group died, as compared with 11 patients in the control group.

Discussion

This large-scale, randomized study assessed the benefit of prophylactic ICD implantation early after myocardial infarction in a contemporary population. The majority of the patients (75%) had undergone reperfusion therapy (percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography or thrombolysis) as well as optimal long-term medical therapy with beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins, and antiplatelet drugs. For risk stratification, we used the following criteria: impaired left ventricular function associated with an increased heart rate, as well as rapid unsustained ventricular tachycardia. Although average left ventricular function was better preserved in this study (ejection fraction, 35%) than in other primary-prevention trials (e.g., 23% in the Second Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial [MADIT II], 25% in the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial [SCD–HeFT, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000609], and 28% in the Defibrillator in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial [DINAMIT]), actual mortality was still substantial — that is, 23% at 3 years; nevertheless, ICD implantation did not convey a prognostic advantage in our study. Thus, with different risk markers, generating a larger population at risk, and a longer follow-up period, our trial confirms the results of DINAMIT.9 According to the calculated confidence interval for the corresponding hazard ratio, risk reductions of up to 19% in our trial (24% in DINAMIT) as well as risk increases of up to 35% (55% in DINAMIT) may have gone undetected.

With respect to the type of death, the ICD significantly reduced the rate of sudden cardiac death, which was counterbalanced by an increase in the rate of cardiac death from other causes, again confirming the findings in DINAMIT.9 It should be kept in mind that this categorization of deaths was done by an event committee on the basis of available data about the circumstances of death, but the committee members were unaware of the study-group assignments.

An increase in the rate of cardiac death other than sudden cardiac death might theoretically be caused by an imbalance in baseline characteristics between the two randomized groups; complications related to ICD implantation; the development of heart failure due to ventricular pacing of the ICD; study-group crossovers; untoward effects of defibrillator shocks and antitachycardia pacing; the substrate of acute myocardial infarction studied (i.e., rapid ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation due to pump failure, which led to death anyway); other, unidentified side effects of the ICD; and between-group differences in the use of concomitant therapies.

Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups, mortality at 1 month was similar, and backup ventricular pacing was programmed to 40 beats per minute; thus, the first three explanations seem unlikely. The rate of crossover from the ICD group to the control group was higher in our study (10.1% [45 of 445 patients]) than in the SCD–HeFT (6.0%), whereas the rate of crossover from the control group to the ICD group was somewhat lower in our study (8.6% [39 of 453 patients]) than in the SCD–HeFT (11.1%).

A recent follow-up study of SCD–HeFT showed that although patients with heart failure have an overall benefit from prophylactic ICD implantation, those receiving shocks have a substantially increased risk of death.25 A similar, though less pronounced, effect of the ICD had also been reported for MADIT II.26-28

The question of which mechanisms considered above might have contributed to the increased risk of nonsudden cardiac death in the ICD group in our study, as well as the extent of the contribution, remains unresolved.

With respect to risk stratification, in our total registry of 62,944 patients, the proportion of patients who met criterion 1 (LVEF ≤40% and heart rate on admission ≥90 beats per minute) and the proportion of patients who met criterion 2 (rapid, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia [≥150 beats per minute]) were very small (1.1% and 0.5%, respectively), accounting for the extension of the recruitment phase to 8 years.

The major reason for difficulties in conducting this study was the unanticipated and multifactorial improvement in outcomes seen in contemporary unselected patient populations after myocardial infarction.1,2,29 After hospital discharge of patients whose myocardial infarction is treated according to current guidelines, sudden cardiac death is not as great a threat as it once was.2

Risk stratification as applied in the IRIS trial has identified a subgroup of patients who are at increased risk for death, including sudden death, but who do not have a response to the early initiation of ICD therapy. Any further attempts to reduce the risk of sudden death with the use of more refined algorithms of identification (e.g., T-wave alternans30 or improved assessment of heart rate variability31), new treatment strategies beyond current guidelines, or both these approaches will probably face similar, major difficulties with respect to study conduct and resources, as reported here for the IRIS trial.

In conclusion, we found no evidence that implantation of an ICD improved survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction who received optimal medical therapy and underwent risk stratification based on elevated heart rate on admission, low LVEF, and rapid, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Although the risk of sudden cardiac death was reduced by ICD therapy, this effect was offset by an increase in the risk of nonsudden cardiac death — an observation that deserves further study.

Supported by grants from Medtronic Bakken Research Center, AstraZeneca, and R. Becker (to Dr. Steinbeck).

Dr. Steinbeck reports receiving consulting fees from Medtronic, lecture fees from Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, and Boston Scientific, and grant support from Medtronic and St. Jude Medical; Dr. Andresen, receiving consulting fees from Medtronic and Biotronik, lecture fees from Medtronic, Biotronik, and St. Jude Medical, and grant support from Medtronic; Dr. Seidl, receiving consulting fees from St. Jude Medical and Medtronic, lecture fees from St. Jude Medical and Biotronik, and grant support from St. Jude Medical and Medtronic; Dr. Brachmann, receiving consulting fees from Medtronic and Biotronik, lecture fees from Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, and Biotronik, and grant support from Biotronik and Medtronic; Dr. Hoffmann, receiving consulting fees from Medtronic, lecture fees from Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, and Biotronik, and grant support from Medtronic, Biotronik, and Sorin; Dr. Wojciechowski, receiving lecture fees from Medtronic; Dr. Sredniawa, receiving consulting fees from Medtronic; Dr. Rosenqvist, receiving consulting fees and lecture fees from Medtronic; Dr. Habets, being an employee of and holding stock options in Medtronic; Dr. Wegscheider, receiving payment as a statistician from Medtronic; and Dr. Senges, receiving consulting fees from Medtronic, Cordis, and Astra, lecture fees from Medtronic, Cordis, and Astra, and grant support from Cordis, St. Jude Medical, and Medtronic.

No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Drs. Steinbeck and Andresen contributed equally to this article.

Source Information

From Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich (G.S.), Klinikum am Urban, Berlin (D.A.), Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen am Rhein (K.S., J.S.), Klinikum Coburg, Coburg (J.B.), Städtisches Krankenhaus München-Bogenhausen, Munich (E.H.), Klinik am Eichert, Göppingen (F.H.), and University Hospital, Hamburg-Eppendorf (K.W.) — all in Germany; Szpital Wolski, Warsaw (D.W.), Pomorska Akademia Medyczna, Szczecin (Z.K.-J.), Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze (B.S.), and Uniwersytecki Szpital, Lodz (A.L.) — all in Poland; Zala County Hospital, Zalaegerszeg, Hungary (G.L.); Karolinska Institute, South Hospital, Stockholm (M.R.); and Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (A.H.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Steinbeck at Department of Internal Medicine I, Ludwig-Maximilian Universität, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany, or at .

The investigators and institutions participating in the Immediate Risk-Stratification Improves Survival (IRIS) trial are listed in the Appendix.

Appendix

The following institutions and investigators participated in the IRIS study: Investigators by country (in descending order of number of enrolled patients) — Austria: Landes KH Universitätskliniken Innsbruck: F. Hintringer. Czech Republic: FNKV Prague: M. Herold; Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove: M. Pleskot, M. Tauchmann; IKEM Prague: J. Kauzner. Germany: Klinikum Coburg: J. Brachmann, K. Gutleben, S. Schnupp; Klinik am Eichert, Göppingen: F. Hofgärtner; Klinikum Leverkusen: J. Aring; St. Johannes-Hospital, Dortmund: H. Heuer, D. Schmitz, M. Schulz; Klinikum Friedrichstadt Dresden: E. Altmann, E. Wunderlich; Amper Kliniken Klinikum Dachau: M. Weber, M. Desaga, J. Schwab; Klinikum am Urban, Berlin: D. Andresen, F. Gindele, N. Ewertsen; Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen: J. Senges, K. Seidl, M. Strauss; Klinikum St. Marien, Amberg: H. Friedl, M. Piana, H. Frank; Klinikum Großhadern, LMU Munich: G. Steinbeck, M. Ulbrich; Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg Berlin: O. Göing, J. Rudolph, J. Heim; Leinebergland-Kliniken Gronau/Leine: H. Duwald, B. Behrens; Klinik f. Innere Medizin III der FSU Jena: G. Dannberg, K. Tittel; Klinikum Ludwigsburg: G. Liebau, A. Rötzer; Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum Villingen-Schwenningen: W. Jung, M. Brasch; Westpfalz-Klinikum, Rockenhausen: W. Feth; Ruppiner Kliniken, Neuruppin: K. Schmailzl, S. Abdija; Marienhospital Gelsenkirchen: H. Blanke, I. Janda; Philippusstift–Katholische Kliniken Essen: B. Hailer, H. Schäfer; Kreiskrankenhaus Kirchberg: L. Griesbach; Westpfalz-Klinikum Kaiserslautern: H. Glunz, E. Helmling; St.-Marien-Hospital Lünen: C. Perings, R. Halfenberg; Katholisches Klinikum Marienhof, Koblenz: M. Manz, D. Burkhardt; Vivantes Humboldt-Klinikum Berlin: S. Behrens, U. Bach; Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg: G. Richardt, R. Schomburg; Spital Waldshut: H. Jenss, S. Kim; Krankenhaus München Neuperlach: H. Mudra, A. Schwende; Städtisches Krankenhaus München-Bogenhausen: E. Hoffmann, P. Landwehr, U. Dorwarth; Privatklinik Schindlbeck, Herrsching: B. Cabell; Universitätsklinikum Mannheim: C. Wolpert; Robert-Koch-Krankenhaus Gehrden: C. Bossaller, M. Voges; Städtisches Krankenhaus Sindelfingen: H. Nebelsieck, U. Pfeilsticker; Mathias Spital, Rheine: H. Odenthal, S. Middendorf; Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin: R. Fenzl, J. Retter; Städtische Kliniken Bielefeld Mitte: C. Stellbrink, C. Strunk-Mueller; Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg: R. Becker, A. Bauer; Klinikum der Hansestadt Stralsund: T. Ittel, M. Suter; Klinikum Chemnitz: G. Baumann, T. Vieth; Klinikum der Universität Regensburg: S. Fredersdorf; Klinikum Fulda: G. Strupp, B. Kalschne; Helmut-G.-Walther-Klinikum Lichtenfels: E. Dünninger, H. Hümmer; Schwalm-Eder-Kliniken Schwalmstadt: R. Zotz; St.-Josefs-Krankenhaus Salzkotten: C. Kirsch, S. Fromel; St. Josef Hospital–Kliniken der Ruhr-Universität, Bochum: A. Mügge, H. Neubauer, J. Börger; Städtisches Klinikum München Schwabing: W. Doering, D. Müller; Kreisklinik Biberach: J. Isbary, T. Brummer; Klinikum Lippe-Detmold: U. Tebbe, B. Boden; Klinikum Kempten-Oberallgäu: F. Seidel, I. Bubinger; Katharinen-Hospital Unna: K. Weber, C. Steffens; Klinikum St. Georg Leipzig: A. Hartmann, F. Mickley; SLK Kliniken Heilbronn — Klinikum am Plattenwald Bad Friedrichshall: J. Manthey, K. Munderloh, K. Ullrich; Kreiskrankenhaus Wolfach: B. Kaufmann; Josephs-Hospital Warendorf: T. Dorsel, N. Wistorf; Oberschwaben-Klinik Krankenhaus St. Elisabeth Ravensburg: M. Sigg, M. Hartl; Sana Krankenhaus Süd Lübeck: B. Schneider; Klinikum Kassel: J. Neuzner, C. Hansen; Klinikum Herford: R. Zotz. Hungary: Zala County Hospital Zalaegerszeg: G. Lupkovics, B. Nemeth; Semmelweis University AOK Budapest: B. Merkely, G. Szucs; Debreceni Egyetem Debrecen: I. Édes, R. Kolozsvári; Szegedi Tudományegyetem Szeged: T. Forster, A. Makai, L. Sághy. Poland: Szpital Wolski, Warsaw: D. Wojciechowski, M. Kowalewski, T. Gdowski, T. Roman; Silesian Center for Heart Disease, Zabrze: M. Zembala, Z. Kalarus, B. Sredniawa, E. Markowicz; Pomorska Akademia Med. Szczecin: C. Kornacewicz-Jach, J. Kazmierczak, R. Rzeuski; SPSK Academii Medycznej Białystok: W. Musial, J. Paruk, M. Witkowski; Szpital Uniwersytecki im. A. Jurasza Bydgoszcz: J. Kubica, W. Krupa, S. Sielski, T. Fabiszak; Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny Warsaw: G. Opolski, P. Stolarz, A. Oręziak; I Klinika Kardiologii Gornoslaskie Centrum Medyczne Katowice: M. Trusz-Gluza, W. Orszulak, A. Filipecki, W. Kwasniewski, D. Kawecka; SP Wojewodzki Szpital Szczecin: M. Kurowski, T. Rozpara, W. Plewik; SPSK Nr 7 Gornoslaskie Centrum Medyczne Katowice: W. Kargul, K. Snajder, K. Goscinska-Bis, K. Maslankiewicz; Szpital Miejski, Gdynia: P. Miekus, M. Szołkiewicz, M. Konarzewski; Krakowski Szpital Spec. im. Jana Pawla II: J. Lelakowsky, J. Bednarek; Szpital Wojewodzki im. Jana Pawla II Zamosc: A. Kleinrok, P. Dabrowski, B. Obszanski; Sp. Zakladem Opieki Zdrowotnej Opole: W. Pluta, G. Hordynski, M. Jedryszczak; Wojewodzki Szpital Sp. Olsztyn: J. Gorny, T. Godlewski; Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny Nr 2 Lodz: A. Lubinski, A. Bissinger; CSK MSWiA, Warsaw: R. Gil, J. Kusnierz; Instytutem Kardiologii Warsaw: H. Szwed, A. Maciag, K. Gepner; 4 Wojskowy Szpital Wroclaw: P. Ponikowski, D. Jagielski; Medical University of Poznan: A. Cieslinski, P. Mitkowski; Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny Nr 3 Lodz: J. Goch, J. Ruta; Szpital Uniwersytecki Krakow: K. Kawecka-Jaszcz, M. Jastrzebski; SPSK 4 Lublin: T. Widomska-Czekajska, K. Poleszak, A. Glowniak, M. Dziduszko; SPSK Nr 1 AM w Gdansku: A. Rynkiewicz, W. Sobiczewski, M. Kempa; Szpital Wojewodzki 2 Rzeszow: J. Kuzniar, K. Dudek. Russia: A.L. Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology Moscow: E. Chazov, E. Kuchinskaya; City Hospital Nr 2, St. Petersburg: D. Lebedev. Slovak Republic: Slovak Institute of Heart and Vascular Diseases, Bratislava: P. Margitfalvi, R. Hatala. Data and Safety Monitoring Board: A. Hjalmarson (chair), L. Kappenberger, N. Victor. Steering Committee: Principal investigators: D. Andresen, J. Senges, G. Steinbeck; Members: E. Hoffmann, K. Seidl, J. Brachmann, A. Lubinski. Adverse Event Committee: M. Rosenqvist (chair), M. Block, W. Schöls, B. Sredniawa. Data Verification Committee: U. Dorwarth, F. Gindele, B. Mark. Statistics: K. Wegscheider. Data Coordination Center: Oncology Services Europe, Munich.

References

References

  1. 1

    Solomon SD, Zelenkofske S, McMurray JJ, et al. Sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2581-2588
    Free Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Adabag AS, Therneau TM, Gersh BJ, Weston SA, Roger VL. Sudden death after myocardial infarction. JAMA 2008;300:2022-2029
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. Clinical characteristics and mortality of patients screened for entry into the Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) study. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:1-5
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Amiodarone Trials Meta-Analysis Investigators. Effect of prophylactic amiodarone on mortality after acute myocardial infarction and in congestive heart failure: meta-analysis of individual data from 6500 patients in randomized trials. Lancet 1997;350:1417-1424
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Jordaens L, Tavernier R, the MIRRACLE Investigators. Determinants of sudden death after discharge from hospital for myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. Eur Heart J 2001;22:1214-1225
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1576-1583
    Free Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:877-883
    Free Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005;352:225-237
    Free Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Dorian P, et al. Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2481-2488
    Free Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Bigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Kleiger R, et al. The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1984;69:250-258
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Gottlieb SS, McCarter RJ, Vogel RA. Effect of beta-blockade on mortality among high-risk and low-risk patients after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998;339:489-497
    Free Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Hjalmarson A, Gilpin EA, Kjekshus J, et al. Influence of heart rate on mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:547-553
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Disegni E, Goldbourt U, Reicher-Reiss H, et al. The predictive value of admission heart rate on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:1197-1205
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Cheema AN, Sheu K, Parker M, Kadish AH, Goldberger JJ. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: tachycardia characteristics and their prognostic implications. Circulation 1998;98:2030-2036
    Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Andresen D, Steinbeck G, Bruggemann T, et al. Risk stratification following myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: a two-step strategy using noninvasive and invasive methods. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:131-138
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Andresen D, Steinbeck G, Bruggemann T, et al. Fast non-sustained ventricular tachycardias predict sudden cardiac death in patients following myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1999;20:Suppl:232-232
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Steinbeck G, Andresen D, Senges J, Hoffmann E, Seidl KH, Brachmann J. Immediate Risk-Stratification Improves Survival (IRIS): study protocol. Europace 2004;6:392-399
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 1979;35:549-556
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Lan KKG, DeMets DL. Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika 1983;70:659-663
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  20. 20

    Whitehead J. The design and analysis of sequential clinical trials. 2nd ed. Rev. New York: Wiley, 1997.

  21. 21

    Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-481
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  22. 22

    Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966;50:163-170
    Medline

  23. 23

    ADDPLAN Adaptive designs — plans and analysis, user's guide, release 4. Cologne, Germany: ADDPLAN GmbH, 2007.

  24. 24

    Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999;94:496-509
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  25. 25

    Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1009-1017
    Free Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Moss AJ, Greenberg H, Case RB, et al. Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator. Circulation 2004;110:3760-3765
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  27. 27

    Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Hall WJ, et al. Causes and consequences of heart failure after prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II. Circulation 2006;113:2810-2817
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Daubert JP, Zareba W, Cannom DS, et al. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1357-1365
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Ezekowitz JA, Kaul P, Bakal JA, Armstrong PW, Welsh RC, McAlister FA. Declining in-hospital mortality and increasing heart failure incidence in elderly patients with first myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:13-20
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    Rosenbaum DS, Jackson LE, Smith JM, Garan H, Ruskin JN, Cohen RJ. Electrical alternans and vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med 1994;330:235-241
    Free Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Bauer A, Kantelhardt JW, Barthel P, et al. Deceleration capacity of heart rate as a predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction: cohort study. Lancet 2006;367:1674-1681
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (118)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Tomas Drabek, Jan Němec. (2013) Anesthetic Management of Electrophysiological Procedures for Heart Failure. International Anesthesiology Clinics 50:3, 22-42

  2. 2

    Larisa G. Tereshchenko. (2013) Controversy surrounding the best time for ICD implantation after myocardial infarction. Heart Rhythm 10:6, 836-837

  3. 3

    Paul L. Hess, Amy Laird, Rex Edwards, Gust H. Bardy, J. Thomas Bigger, Alfred E. Buxton, Arthur J. Moss, Kerry L. Lee, W.J. Hall, Richard Steinman, Paul Dorian, Al Hallstrom, Riccardo Cappato, Alan H. Kadish, Peter J. Kudenchuk, Daniel B. Mark, Sana M. Al-Khatib, Jonathan P. Piccini, Lurdes Y.T. Inoue, Gillian D. Sanders. (2013) Survival benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy after myocardial infarction: Does time to implant matter? A meta-analysis using patient-level data from 4 clinical trials. Heart Rhythm 10:6, 828-835

  4. 4

    Mads Ersbøll, Nana Valeur, Ulrik Madvig Mogensen, Mads Jønsson Andersen, Jacob Eifer Møller, Eric J. Velazquez, Christian Hassager, Peter Søgaard, Lars Køber. (2013) Prediction of All-Cause Mortality and Heart Failure Admissions From Global Left Ventricular Longitudinal Strain in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 61:23, 2365-2373

  5. 5

    Tiffany Randolph, Jonathan P. Piccini. (2013) Optimal Utilization and Management of Implanted Cardiac Rhythm Devices in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure. Heart Failure Clinics

  6. 6

    H. U. Klein, I. Goldenberg, A. J. Moss. (2013) Risk stratification for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: the role of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator. European Heart Journal

  7. 7

    Niyada Naksuk, Mehmet Akkaya, Selcuk Adabag. (2013) Application of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Risk Score in a Nontrial Setting. The American Journal of Cardiology

  8. 8

    Jerzy Sacha, Szymon Barabach, Gabriela Statkiewicz-Barabach, Krzysztof Sacha, Alexander Müller, Jaroslaw Piskorski, Petra Barthel, Georg Schmidt. (2013) How to select patients who will not benefit from ICD therapy by using heart rate and its variability?. International Journal of Cardiology

  9. 9

    Andrea M. Russo, Raymond F. Stainback, Steven R. Bailey, Andrew E. Epstein, Paul A. Heidenreich, Mariell Jessup, Suraj Kapa, Mark S. Kremers, Bruce D. Lindsay, Lynne Warner Stevenson. (2013) ACCF/HRS/AHA/ASE/HFSA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2013 Appropriate Use Criteria for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Heart Rhythm 10:4, e11-e58

  10. 10

    Kristina Wasmer, Julia Köbe, Dietrich Andresen, Ralf Zahn, Stefan G. Spitzer, Joachim Jehle, Johannes Brachmann, Christoph Stellbrink, Eimo Martens, Matthias Hochadel, Jochen Senges, Helmut Klein, Lars Eckardt. (2013) Comparing outcome of patients with coronary artery disease and dilated cardiomyopathy in ICD and CRT recipients: data from the German DEVICE—registry. Clinical Research in Cardiology

  11. 11

    Raul D. Mitrani, Amanda Mcardle, Michele Slane, John Cogan, Robert J. Myerburg. (2013) Wearable defibrillators in uninsured patients with newly diagnosed cardiomyopathy or recent revascularization in a community medical center. American Heart Journal 165:3, 386-392

  12. 12

    Andrea M. Russo, Raymond F. Stainback, Steven R. Bailey, Andrew E. Epstein, Paul A. Heidenreich, Mariell Jessup, Suraj Kapa, Mark S. Kremers, Bruce D. Lindsay, Lynne Warner Stevenson. (2013) ACCF/HRS/AHA/ASE/HFSA/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2013 Appropriate Use Criteria for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology

  13. 13

    Robert S. McKelvie, Gordon W. Moe, Justin A. Ezekowitz, George A. Heckman, Jeannine Costigan, Anique Ducharme, Estrellita Estrella-Holder, Nadia Giannetti, Adam Grzeslo, Karen Harkness, Jonathan G. Howlett, Simon Kouz, Kori Leblanc, Elizabeth Mann, Anil Nigam, Eileen O'Meara, Miroslaw Rajda, Brian Steinhart, Elizabeth Swiggum, Vy Van Le, Shelley Zieroth, J. Malcolm O. Arnold, Tom Ashton, Michel D'Astous, Paul Dorian, Haissam Haddad, Debra L. Isaac, Marie-Hélène Leblanc, Peter Liu, Vivek Rao, Heather J. Ross, Bruce Sussex. (2013) The 2012 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure Management Guidelines Update: Focus on Acute and Chronic Heart Failure. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 29:2, 168-181

  14. 14

    Demosthenes G. Katritsis, Konstantinos C. Siontis, J. Thomas Bigger, Alan H. Kadish, Richard Steinman, Wojciech Zareba, George C.M. Siontis, Gust H. Bardy, John P.A. Ioannidis. (2013) Effect of left ventricular ejection fraction and QRS duration on the survival benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Meta-analysis of primary prevention trials. Heart Rhythm 10:2, 200-206

  15. 15

    Patricia Tung, Christine M. Albert. (2013) Causes and prevention of sudden cardiac death in the elderly. Nature Reviews Cardiology 10:3, 135-142

  16. 16

    Jaimie Manlucu, William T. Abraham. Implantable Devices for the Management of Heart Failure. In: Cardiovascular Therapeutics: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease. Elsevier, 2013:270-280.

  17. 17

    Mark A. Wood, Kenneth A. Ellenbogen. Role of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Primary and Secondary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. In: Cardiovascular Therapeutics: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease. Elsevier, 2013:396-407.

  18. 18

    James V. Freeman, Frederick A. Masoudi. (2013) Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure. Heart Failure Clinics 9:1, 59-77

  19. 19

    Benoit Daneault, Philippe Généreux, Ajay J. Kirtane, Bernhard Witzenbichler, Giulio Guagliumi, Jean-Michel Paradis, Martin P. Fahy, Roxana Mehran, Gregg W. Stone. (2013) Comparison of Three-Year Outcomes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction <40% Versus ≥40% (from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial). The American Journal of Cardiology 111:1, 12-20

  20. 20

    Stanley S. Liu, Jennifer Monti, Hamid M. Kargbo, Muhammad W. Athar, Kapil Parakh. (2013) Frontiers of Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure. The American Journal of Medicine 126:1, 6-12.e6

  21. 21

    Patrick T. O'Gara, Frederick G. Kushner, Deborah D. Ascheim, Donald E. Casey, Mina K. Chung, James A. de Lemos, Steven M. Ettinger, James C. Fang, Francis M. Fesmire, Barry A. Franklin, Christopher B. Granger, Harlan M. Krumholz, Jane A. Linderbaum, David A. Morrow, L. Kristin Newby, Joseph P. Ornato, Narith Ou, Martha J. Radford, Jacqueline E. Tamis-Holland, Carl L. Tommaso, Cynthia M. Tracy, Y. Joseph Woo, David X. Zhao. (2013) 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 61:4, e78-e140

  22. 22

    Patrick T. O'Gara, Frederick G. Kushner, Deborah D. Ascheim, Donald E. Casey, Mina K. Chung, James A. de Lemos, Steven M. Ettinger, James C. Fang, Francis M. Fesmire, Barry A. Franklin, Christopher B. Granger, Harlan M. Krumholz, Jane A. Linderbaum, David A. Morrow, L. Kristin Newby, Joseph P. Ornato, Narith Ou, Martha J. Radford, Jacqueline E. Tamis-Holland, Carl L. Tommaso, Cynthia M. Tracy, Y. Joseph Woo, David X. Zhao. (2013) 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 61:4, 485-510

  23. 23

    Andrea Sarkozy, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero, Pedro Brugada. (2013) Muerte súbita cardiaca en las cardiopatías estructurales. Revista Española de Cardiología Suplementos 13, 7-13

  24. 24

    Attila Roka, Mark H. Schoenfeld. (2012) The pathway to physician reimbursement for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): a history and brief synopsis. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

  25. 25

    K. D. Rizas, A. Bauer. (2012) Risk stratification after myocardial infarction: it is time for intervention. Europace 14:12, 1684-1686

  26. 26

    Jonathan P. Man, Andrew E. Epstein. (2012) Ventricular Arrhythmias. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 28:4, 679-691

  27. 27

    Giuseppe Inama, Claudio Pedrinazzi, Maurizio Landolina, Fabrizio Oliva, Michele Senni, Alessandro Proclemer, Massimo Zoni Berisso, Salvatore Pirelli. (2012) Use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 13:11, 675-683

  28. 28

    Demosthenes G. Katritsis, Wojciech Zareba, A. John Camm. (2012) Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 60:20, 1993-2004

  29. 29

    Roy M John, Usha B Tedrow, Bruce A Koplan, Christine M Albert, Laurence M Epstein, Michael O Sweeney, Amy Leigh Miller, Gregory F Michaud, William G Stevenson. (2012) Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The Lancet 380:9852, 1520-1529

  30. 30

    John J.V. McMurray, Stamatis Adamopoulos, Stefan D. Anker, Angelo Auricchio, Michael Böhm, Kenneth Dickstein, Volkmar Falk, Gerasimos Filippatos, Cândida Fonseca, Miguel Angel Gomez Sanchez, Tiny Jaarsma, Lars Køber, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Aldo Pietro Maggioni, Alexander Parkhomenko, Burkert M. Pieske, Bogdan A. Popescu, Per K. Rønnevik, Frans H. Rutten, Juerg Schwitter, Petar Seferovic, Janina Stepinska, Pedro T. Trindade, Adriaan A. Voors, Faiez Zannad, Andreas Zeiher, Jeroen J. Bax, Helmut Baumgartner, Claudio Ceconi, Veronica Dean, Christi Deaton, Robert Fagard, Christian Funck-Brentano, David Hasdai, Arno Hoes, Paulus Kirchhof, Juhani Knuuti, Philippe Kolh, Theresa h, Cyril Moulin, Bogdan A. Popescu, Zeljko Reiner, Udo Sechtem, Per Anton Sirnes, Michal Tendera, Adam Torbicki, Alec Vahanian, Stephan Windecker, Theresa McDonagh, Udo Sechtem, Luis Almenar Bonet, Panayiotis Avraamides, Hisham A. Ben Lamin, Michele Brignole, Antonio Coca, Peter Cowburn, Henry Dargie, Perry Elliott, Frank Arnold Flachskampf, Guido Francesco Guida, Suzanna Hardman, Bernard Iung, Bela Merkely, Christian Mueller, John N. Nanas, Olav Wendelboe Nielsen, Stein Ørn, John T. Parissis, Piotr Ponikowski. (2012) Guía de práctica clínica de la ESC sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y crónica 2012. Revista Española de Cardiología 65:10, 938.e1-938.e59

  31. 31

    Olena Dotsenko, Alon Barsheshet, David T Huang. (2012) Cardiac resynchronization therapy for prevention of heart failure events in elderly patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 10:10, 1319-1327

  32. 32

    Hye Jin Hwang, Woochul Chang, Byeong-Wook Song, Heesang Song, Min-Ji Cha, Il-Kwon Kim, Soyeon Lim, Eun Ju Choi, Onju Ham, Se-Yeon Lee, Jaemin Shim, Boyoung Joung, Hui-Nam Pak, Sung Soon Kim, Bum-Rak Choi, Yangsoo Jang, Moon-Hyoung Lee, Ki-Chul Hwang. (2012) Antiarrhythmic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Is Modulated by Hypoxic Environment. Journal of the American College of Cardiology

  33. 33

    Evaldas Giedrimas, Bradley P Knight. Device therapy in heart failure. In: Advances in Heart Failure Management. Future Medicine Ltd, 2012:88-101.

  34. 34

    Charles Swerdlow, Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, George J. Klein. (2012) Resolving the conflict: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias increase mortality. Heart Rhythm 9:8, 1328-1330

  35. 35

    , J. J. V. McMurray, S. Adamopoulos, S. D. Anker, A. Auricchio, M. Bohm, K. Dickstein, V. Falk, G. Filippatos, C. Fonseca, M. A. Gomez-Sanchez, T. Jaarsma, L. Kober, G. Y. H. Lip, A. P. Maggioni, A. Parkhomenko, B. M. Pieske, B. A. Popescu, P. K. Ronnevik, F. H. Rutten, J. Schwitter, P. Seferovic, J. Stepinska, P. T. Trindade, A. A. Voors, F. Zannad, A. Zeiher, , J. J. Bax, H. Baumgartner, C. Ceconi, V. Dean, C. Deaton, R. Fagard, C. Funck-Brentano, D. Hasdai, A. Hoes, P. Kirchhof, J. Knuuti, P. Kolh, T. McDonagh, C. Moulin, B. A. Popescu, Z. Reiner, U. Sechtem, P. A. Sirnes, M. Tendera, A. Torbicki, A. Vahanian, S. Windecker, , T. McDonagh, U. Sechtem, L. A. Bonet, P. Avraamides, H. A. Ben Lamin, M. Brignole, A. Coca, P. Cowburn, H. Dargie, P. Elliott, F. A. Flachskampf, G. F. Guida, S. Hardman, B. Iung, B. Merkely, C. Mueller, J. N. Nanas, O. W. Nielsen, S. Orn, J. T. Parissis, P. Ponikowski. (2012) ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. European Journal of Heart Failure 14:8, 803-869

  36. 36

    , J. J. V. McMurray, S. Adamopoulos, S. D. Anker, A. Auricchio, M. Bohm, K. Dickstein, V. Falk, G. Filippatos, C. Fonseca, M. A. Gomez-Sanchez, T. Jaarsma, L. Kober, G. Y. H. Lip, A. P. Maggioni, A. Parkhomenko, B. M. Pieske, B. A. Popescu, P. K. Ronnevik, F. H. Rutten, J. Schwitter, P. Seferovic, J. Stepinska, P. T. Trindade, A. A. Voors, F. Zannad, A. Zeiher, , J. J. Bax, H. Baumgartner, C. Ceconi, V. Dean, C. Deaton, R. Fagard, C. Funck-Brentano, D. Hasdai, A. Hoes, P. Kirchhof, J. Knuuti, P. Kolh, T. McDonagh, C. Moulin, B. A. Popescu, Z. Reiner, U. Sechtem, P. A. Sirnes, M. Tendera, A. Torbicki, A. Vahanian, S. Windecker, , T. McDonagh, U. Sechtem, L. A. Bonet, P. Avraamides, H. A. Ben Lamin, M. Brignole, A. Coca, P. Cowburn, H. Dargie, P. Elliott, F. A. Flachskampf, G. F. Guida, S. Hardman, B. Iung, B. Merkely, C. Mueller, J. N. Nanas, O. W. Nielsen, S. Orn, J. T. Parissis, P. Ponikowski. (2012) ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. European Heart Journal 33:14, 1787-1847

  37. 37

    Larisa G. Tereshchenko, Ronald D. Berger. (2012) A Patient Presents with Longstanding, Severe LV Dysfunction. Is There a Role for Additional Risk Stratification Before ICD?. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics 4:2, 151-160

  38. 38

    Paul Dorian. (2012) Counterpoint: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias do not increase mortality. Heart Rhythm 9:6, 988-991

  39. 39

    R. Bastiaenen, V. Batchvarov, M. M. Gallagher. (2012) Ventricular automaticity as a predictor of sudden death in ischaemic heart disease. Europace 14:6, 795-803

  40. 40

    D. G. Katritsis, M. E. Josephson. (2012) Sudden cardiac death and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: two modern epidemics?. Europace 14:6, 787-794

  41. 41

    Gunnar Erikssen, Knut Liestøl, Lars Gullestad, Kristina H. Haugaa, Bjørn Bendz, Jan P. Amlie. (2012) The Terminal Part of the QT Interval (T peak to T end): A Predictor of Mortality after Acute Myocardial Infarction. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology 17:2, 85-94

  42. 42

    Charles Knight, Adam D. Timmis. (2012) Almanac 2011: Acute coronary syndromes. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology. The Egyptian Heart Journal

  43. 43

    Nawaf S. Al-Majed, Justin A. Ezekowitz. (2012) The Timing of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in Patients with Heart Failure. Current Cardiology Reports

  44. 44

    Reginald Liew. (2012) Almanac 2011: Cardiac arrhythmias and pacing. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology. The Egyptian Heart Journal 64:1, 25-37

  45. 45

    Paban Saha, Jeffrey J. Goldberger. (2012) Risk Stratification for Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 14:1, 81-90

  46. 46

    Charles Knight, Adam D. Timmis. (2012) Almanac 2011: Acute coronary syndromes. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition) 31:2, 179-188

  47. 47

    Paul A. Scott, Laurence D. Sterns, Anthony S. Tang. (2012) Do patients at high risk of nonsudden cardiac death benefit from prophylactic ICD therapy?. Current Opinion in Cardiology 27:1, 1-7

  48. 48

    Reginald Liew. (2012) Almanac 2011: Cardiac arrhythmias and pacing. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition) 31:1, 57-69

  49. 49

    Reginald Liew. (2012) Almanac 2011: Cardiac arrhythmias and pacing. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia 31:1, 57-69

  50. 50

    Demosthenes G. Katritsis, Wojciech Zareba, A. John Camm. Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia. In: Electrophysiological Disorders of the Heart. Elsevier, 2012:625-640.

  51. 51

    Sanjeev Saksena, Rangadham Nagarakanti, Nandini Madan, Mark Preminger. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators. In: Electrophysiological Disorders of the Heart. Elsevier, 2012:1203-1218.

  52. 52

    Matthew Wright, Frederic Sacher, Michel Haïssaguerre. Electrophysiological Evaluation of Ventricular Fibrillation. In: Electrophysiological Disorders of the Heart. Elsevier, 2012:327-332.

  53. 53

    Jason A. Goebel, Michael R. Gold. Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death with Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. In: Electrophysiological Disorders of the Heart. Elsevier, 2012:1239-1252.

  54. 54

    William G. Stevenson. Ventricular Arrhythmias. In: Goldman's Cecil Medicine. Elsevier, 2012:359-368.

  55. 55

    Jeffrey L. Anderson. ST Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction and Complications of Myocardial Infarction. In: Goldman's Cecil Medicine. Elsevier, 2012:434-448.

  56. 56

    Krishnakumar Nair, Jack V. Tu, Douglas S. Lee. (2011) Why Are Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Outcomes in Practice Different from Clinical Trials?. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics 3:4, 511-520

  57. 57

    Charles Knight, Adam D. Timmis. (2011) Almanac 2011: Acute coronary syndromes. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia

  58. 58

    Simon Brüllmann, Wolfgang Dichtl, Ursula Paoli, Laurent Haegeli, Christian Schmied, Jan Steffel, Corinna Brunckhorst, Florian Hintringer, Burkhard Seifert, Firat Duru, Thomas Wolber. (2011) Comparison of Benefit and Mortality of Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator Therapy in Patients Aged ≥75 Years Versus Those <75 Years. The American Journal of Cardiology

  59. 59

    Rajendra H. Mehta, Jennifer Yu, Jonathan P. Piccini, James E. Tcheng, Michael E. Farkouh, James Reiffel, Martin Fahy, Roxana Mehran, Gregg W. Stone. (2011) Prognostic Significance of Postprocedural Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial). The American Journal of Cardiology

  60. 60

    J. Sjoblom, L. Ljung, M. Frick, M. Rosenqvist, V. Frykman. (2011) Primary prevention of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: clinical practice and compliance to guidelines. Europace

  61. 61

    James R. Harkness, David A. Morrow, Eugene Braunwald, Fang Ren, J. Lopez-Sendon, Christopher Bode, Andrzej Budaj, Benjamin M. Scirica. (2011) Myocardial Ischemia and Ventricular Tachycardia on Continuous Electrocardiographic Monitoring and Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes After Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 Trial). The American Journal of Cardiology 108:10, 1373-1381

  62. 62

    Gregory M. Marcus, Melvin M. Scheinman, Edmund Keung. (2011) The Year in Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:16, 1645-1655

  63. 63

    Mustafa Dohadwala, N. A. Mark Estes, Mark S. Link. (2011) New Paradigms in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Heart Failure Treatment. Current Cardiology Reports 13:5, 377-386

  64. 64

    T. Smith, P. F. Dessel, D. A. M. J. Theuns, A. Muskens-Heemskerk, R. T. Domburg, A. A. Wilde, L. Jordaens. (2011) Health care utilisation after defibrillator implantation for primary prevention according to the guidelines in 2 Dutch academic medical centres. Netherlands Heart Journal 19:10, 405-411

  65. 65

    Samir Saba. (2011) Death during acute myocardial infarction: Dodging the first bullet. Heart Rhythm 8:9, 1467-1468

  66. 66

    Jordan M. Prutkin, Jeanne E. Poole. (2011) Complications of ICD Generator Change and Implantations. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics 3:3, 389-401

  67. 67

    T. Jared Bunch, Heidi T. May, Tami L. Bair, Brian G. Crandall, J. Peter Weiss, Jeffrey S. Osborn, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Joseph B. Muhlestein, Benjamin D. Horne, Donald L. Lappe, John D. Day. (2011) Trends in early and late mortality in patients undergoing coronary catheterization for myocardial infarction: implications on observation periods and risk factors to determine ICD candidacy. Heart Rhythm 8:9, 1460-1466

  68. 68

    Johannes B. van Rees, Mihály K. de Bie, Joep Thijssen, C. Jan Willem Borleffs, Martin J. Schalij, Lieselot van Erven. (2011) Implantation-Related Complications of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:10, 995-1000

  69. 69

    Eric C. Stecker, Sumeet S. Chugh. (2011) Prediction of sudden cardiac death: next steps in pursuit of effective methodology. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 31:2, 101-107

  70. 70

    Vincent Floré, Piet Claus, Gudrun Antoons, Peter Oosterhoff, Patricia Holemans, Marc A. Vos, Karin R. Sipido, Rik Willems. (2011) Microvolt T-wave alternans and beat-to-beat variability of repolarization during early postischemic remodeling in a pig heart. Heart Rhythm 8:7, 1050-1057

  71. 71

    N. A. Mark Estes, Munther Homoud, Jonathan Weinstock, Caroline Foote, Ania Garlitski, Mark Link, Afshin Ehsan. (2011) Interdisciplinary strategies for arrhythmia program development: measuring quality, performance, and outcomes. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 31:1, 91-99

  72. 72

    John R. Wilson. (2011) Rhetorical Strategies Used in the Reporting of Implantable Defibrillator Primary Prevention Trials. The American Journal of Cardiology 107:12, 1806-1811

  73. 73

    I. A. Fazal, M. G. D. Bates, I. G. Matthews, A. J. Turley. (2011) Do implantable cardioverter defibrillators improve survival in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction after coronary artery bypass graft surgery?. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 12:6, 1010-1016

  74. 74

    (2011) Deutsch-österreichische S3-Leitlinie „Infarktbedingter kardiogener Schock – Diagnose, Monitoring und Therapie“. Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 48:4, 291-344

  75. 75

    M. Malik. (2011) Ventricular gradient and cardiac risk. Europace 13:5, 605-607

  76. 76

    Ayesha Hasan, Benjamin Sun. (2011) Defibrillators and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy as a Bridge to Cardiac Transplantation. Heart Failure Clinics 7:2, 227-239

  77. 77

    H. Voller, W. Kamke, H. U. Klein, M. Block, R. Reibis, S. Treusch, K. Contzen, K. Wegscheider, . (2011) Clinical practice of defibrillator implantation after myocardial infarction: impact of implant time: results from the PreSCD II Registry. Europace 13:4, 499-508

  78. 78

    Samir Saba. (2011) Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification and Assessment: Primary Prevention Based on Ejection Fraction Criteria. Heart Failure Clinics 7:2, 175-183

  79. 79

    Andrea M. Russo. (2011) Risk stratification early post-MI after percutaneous coronary intervention: Should programmed ventricular stimulation be revisited?. Heart Rhythm 8:4, 500-502

  80. 80

    Edward L. Korn, Boris Freidlin. (2011) Inefficacy Interim Monitoring Procedures in Randomized Clinical Trials: The Need to Report. The American Journal of Bioethics 11:3, 2-10

  81. 81

    Cynthia M. Tracy. (2011) Mortality benefits from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy are not restricted to patients with remote myocardial infarction. Heart Rhythm 8:3, 401-402

  82. 82

    Jonathan P. Piccini, Sana M. Al-Khatib, Anne S. Hellkamp, Kevin J. Anstrom, Jeanne E. Poole, Daniel B. Mark, Kerry L. Lee, Gust H. Bardy. (2011) Mortality benefits from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy are not restricted to patients with remote myocardial infarction: an analysis from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT). Heart Rhythm 8:3, 393-400

  83. 83

    Grace Huang, Mohammad Pashmforoush, Brile Chung, Leslie A. Saxon. (2011) The Role of Cardiac Electrophysiology in Myocardial Regenerative Stem Cell Therapy. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research 4:1, 61-65

  84. 84

    Saurabh Kumar, Gopal Sivagangabalan, Sarah Zaman, Pramesh Kovoor. (2011) Author Reply—ICD Implantation Early After Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Heart Rhythm 8:1, e2

  85. 85

    Raja Selvaraj, Krishnakumar Nair. (2011) To the Editor—ICD Implantation Early After Myocardial Infarction. Heart Rhythm 8:1, e1

  86. 86

    José A. Barrabés, Vicente Bodí, Javier Jiménez-Candil, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz. (2011) Actualización en cardiopatía isquémica. Revista Española de Cardiología 64, 50-58

  87. 87

    Antonio Hernández-Madrid, Roberto Matía Francés, Concepción Moro. (2011) Novedades en electrofisiología cardiaca y arritmias. Revista Española de Cardiología 64, 81-90

  88. 88

    Derek V. Exner. Clinical Trials of Defibrillator Therapy. In: Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy. Elsevier, 2011:257-278.

  89. 89

    Frédéric L. Paulin, Derek V. Exner. Sudden Cardiac Death. In: Textbook of Critical Care. Elsevier, 2011:594-603.

  90. 90

    Ilan Goldenberg, Arthur J. Moss. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with coronary artery disease. In: Coronary Care Manual. Elsevier, 2011:417-427.

  91. 91

    Saurabh Kumar, Gopal Sivagangabalan, Sarah Zaman, Elizabeth B. West, Arun Narayan, Aravinda Thiagalingam, Pramesh Kovoor. (2010) Electrophysiology-guided defibrillator implantation early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Rhythm 7:11, 1589-1597

  92. 92

    D. A. M. J. Theuns, T. Smith, M. G. M. Hunink, G. H. Bardy, L. Jordaens. (2010) Effectiveness of prophylactic implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators without cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic or non-ischaemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 12:11, 1564-1570

  93. 93

    Eric C. Stecker. (2010) Is there new hope for sudden cardiac death prevention early after myocardial infarction?. Heart Rhythm 7:11, 1598-1599

  94. 94

    Giuseppe Boriani, Igor Diemberger, Cinzia Valzania, Mauro Biffi, Cristian Martignani, Emanuel Raschi, Valentina Mantovani, Matteo Ziacchi, Matteo Bertini, Fabrizio De Ponti, Angelo Branzi. (2010) Role of drugs and devices in patients at risk of sudden cardiac death. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 24:5, 575-594

  95. 95

    Niloufar Tabatabaei, Stephen C. Hammill. (2010) Role of the Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in the Post-myocardial Infarction Patient. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports 4:5, 321-326

  96. 96

    S. M. Al-Khatib, G. Hafley, K. L. Lee, A. E. Buxton. (2010) Relation between time from myocardial infarction to enrolment and patient outcomes in the Multicenter UnSustained Tachycardia Trial. Europace 12:8, 1112-1118

  97. 97

    H. V. Huikuri. (2010) Timing of implantation of cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction. Europace 12:8, 1057-1058

  98. 98

    Pasquale Santangeli, Gemma Pelargonio, Antonio Dello Russo, Michela Casella, Caterina Bisceglia, Stefano Bartoletti, Pietro Santarelli, Luigi Di Biase, Andrea Natale. (2010) Gender differences in clinical outcome and primary prevention defibrillator benefit in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm 7:7, 876-882

  99. 99

    Badri Chandrasekaran, Peter J Cowburn. (2010) Heart failure: the challenge of selecting patients for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Expert Review of Medical Devices 7:4, 461-467

  100. 100

    C.W. Israel. (2010) ICD-Therapie zur Primärprävention des plötzlichen Herztods. Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie 21:2, 102-108

  101. 101

    Mark J. Boogers, Martin J. Schalij, Jeroen J. Bax. (2010) Should mechanical dyssynchrony be assessed in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators?. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 17:3, 354-358

  102. 102

    N.C. Ewertsen, G. Steinbeck, J. Senges, D. Andresen. (2010) ICD-Therapie zur Primärprävention. Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie 21:2, 109-111

  103. 103

    D. Bänsch, G. Grönefeld. (2010) Der Patient mit chronischer Herzinsuffizienz. Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie 21:2, 112-116

  104. 104

    Richard N Vest, Michael R Gold. (2010) Risk stratification of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with systolic heart failure. Current Opinion in Cardiology 25:3, 268-275

  105. 105

    Beata Sredniawa, Michal Mazurek, Radoslaw Lenarczyk, Oskar Kowalski, Jacek Kowalczyk, Zbigniew Kalarus. (2010) Early therapy following myocardial infarction: arguments for and against implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Future Cardiology 6:3, 315-323

  106. 106

    Brian Olshansky, Mario Delmar, Gordon F. Tomaselli. (2010) The year in arrhythmias—2009 Part II. Heart Rhythm 7:4, 538-548

  107. 107

    Emile G Daoud, John D Hummel, Troy E Rhodes. (2010) Management of sudden cardiac death risk in the very early postmyocardial infarction period. Current Opinion in Cardiology1

  108. 108

    Theresa McDonagh, Kaushik Guha. (2010) British Society of Heart Failure 2009 meeting report. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 8:4, 499-502

  109. 109

    J. M. McComb. (2010) Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction: lessons from Leiden. Europace 12:3, 307-308

  110. 110

    Michael O. Sweeney, Lou Sherfesee, Paul J. DeGroot, Mark S. Wathen, Bruce L. Wilkoff. (2010) Differences in effects of electrical therapy type for ventricular arrhythmias on mortality in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Heart Rhythm 7:3, 353-360

  111. 111

    Alfred E Buxton, Kristin E Ellison, Peem Lorvidhaya, Ohad Ziv. (2010) Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction for Sudden Death Risk Stratification and Guiding ICD Implantation. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology1

  112. 112

    (2010) Defibrillator Implantation Early after Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 362:3, 269-270
    Free Full Text

  113. 113

    JONATHAN P. PICCINI, SANA M. AL-KHATIB, EVAN R. MYERS, KEVIN J. ANSTROM, ALFRED E. BUXTON, ERIC D. PETERSON, GILLIAN D. SANDERS. (2010) Optimal Timing of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation After Myocardial Infarction: A Decision Analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

  114. 114

    Alexandra King. (2010) Acute coronary syndromes: Preventing sudden cardiac death early after myocardial infarction—ICDs are not the solution. Nature Reviews Cardiology 7:1, 1-1

  115. 115

    Marek Malik. (2010) ECG and VT/VF Symposium. Journal of Electrocardiology 43:1, 1-3

  116. 116

    C.R. Reynolds. (2010) Defibrillator Implantation Early after Myocardial Infarction. Yearbook of Cardiology 2010, 564-566

  117. 117

    C. Kouakam, N. Saoudi, S. Kacet. (2010) DAI : quel est le bon nombre d’implantations ?. Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux - Pratique 2010:184, 7-15

  118. 118

    Garber , Alan M. , Hlatky , Mark A. , . (2009) The Confirmatory Trial in Comparative-Effectiveness Research. New England Journal of Medicine 361:15, 1498-1499
    Full Text

Letters

Trends

Most Viewed (Last Week)