Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

A New Diagnostic Test for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Angeliki Asimaki, Ph.D., Harikrishna Tandri, M.D., Hayden Huang, Ph.D., Marc K. Halushka, M.D., Ph.D., Shiva Gautam, Ph.D., Cristina Basso, M.D., Ph.D., Gaetano Thiene, M.D., Adalena Tsatsopoulou, M.D., Nikos Protonotarios, M.D., William J. McKenna, M.D., D.Sc., Hugh Calkins, M.D., and Jeffrey E. Saffitz, M.D., Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 2009; 360:1075-1084March 12, 2009

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) can be challenging because the clinical presentation is highly variable and genetic penetrance is often low.

Methods

To determine whether a change in the distribution of desmosomal proteins can be used as a sensitive and specific diagnostic test for ARVC, we performed immunohistochemical analysis of human myocardial samples.

Results

We first tested myocardium from 11 subjects with ARVC; of these samples, 8 had desmosomal gene mutations. We also tested myocardium obtained at autopsy from 10 subjects with no clinical or pathological evidence of heart disease as control samples. All ARVC samples but no control samples showed a marked reduction in immunoreactive signal levels for plakoglobin (also known as γ-catenin), a protein that links adhesion molecules at the intercalated disk to the cytoskeleton. Other desmosomal proteins showed variable changes, but signal levels for the nondesmosomal adhesion molecule N-cadherin were normal in all subjects with ARVC. To determine whether a diminished plakoglobin signal level was specific for ARVC, we analyzed myocardium from 15 subjects with hypertrophic, dilated, or ischemic cardiomyopathies. In every sample, levels of N-cadherin and plakoglobin signals at junctions were indistinguishable from those in control samples. Finally, we performed blinded immunohistochemical analysis of heart-biopsy samples from the Johns Hopkins ARVC registry. We made the correct diagnosis in 10 of 11 subjects with definite ARVC on the basis of clinical criteria and correctly ruled out ARVC in 10 of 11 subjects without ARVC, for a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 82%, a positive predictive value of 83%, and a negative predictive value of 90%. The plakoglobin signal level was reduced diffusely in ARVC samples, including those obtained in the left ventricle and the interventricular septum.

Conclusions

Routine immunohistochemical analysis of a conventional endomyocardial-biopsy sample appears to be a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic test for ARVC.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Immunofluorescence Images of Left Ventricular Myocardium from Two Subjects with ARVC and a Control Subject.
Figure 2Immunofluorescence Images of Myocardium from a Control Subject and from Three Subjects with End-Stage Heart Disease.
Article

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is associated with a high frequency of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.1-3 Mutations in genes encoding desmosomal proteins (including desmoplakin, plakoglobin, plakophilin 2, desmocollin 2, and desmoglein 2) have been identified in approximately 40% of patients with ARVC.4 However, genetic analysis remains a research tool, and in everyday practice, the diagnosis of ARVC can be challenging. The clinical presentation may be highly variable, and the genetic penetrance is often low. This is especially true in family members of an index patient in whom establishing a diagnosis of ARVC requires extensive clinical workup, often leading to equivocal results. Endomyocardial biopsy has not been consistently useful because the structural changes in ARVC tend to spare the subendocardium and do not typically involve the interventricular septum.2 Thus, the pathological features of ARVC are often not seen in conventional endomyocardial-biopsy specimens. Moreover, these pathological features tend to be most conspicuous in patients with severe disease and are not well developed in patients with early disease. In the end, the diagnosis usually rests on fulfilling a set of clinical criteria, as defined by an international ARVC task force.5 Although these criteria are relatively specific, they are not highly sensitive.

We had observed that the immunoreactive signal level for the desmosomal protein plakoglobin, also known as γ-catenin, was dramatically reduced at intercalated disks in patients with rare recessive forms of ARVC (Naxos disease and the Carvajal syndrome).6,7 We have since had an opportunity to study more common forms of ARVC related to dominant mutations in a variety of desmosomal genes and have observed a reduced plakoglobin signal level.8 On the basis of these observations, we wanted to determine whether a decreased plakoglobin signal level at the myocardial cell–cell junctions is a sensitive and specific marker for ARVC.

Methods

We analyzed three sets of samples, all consisting of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded myocardium obtained on autopsy or endomyocardial biopsy. Information regarding antibodies, immunohistochemical protocols, and statistical analysis appears in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

Results

Subjects with Documented ARVC

We first performed immunohistochemical analysis on cardiac tissue samples obtained either on biopsy or on autopsy from 11 subjects who were known to have ARVC. Eight of these subjects had a specific mutation in a desmosomal protein gene. Table 1Table 1Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Subjects with ARVC. shows the clinical characteristics and the results of genetic analysis of these subjects. In every case, we found that immunoreactive signal levels for the desmosomal protein plakoglobin were reduced at intercalated disks, whereas plakoglobin signal levels were strongly positive in myocardium obtained on autopsy from 10 control subjects with no clinical or pathological evidence of heart disease (Figure 1Figure 1Immunofluorescence Images of Left Ventricular Myocardium from Two Subjects with ARVC and a Control Subject.). Plakoglobin signal levels were reduced not only in right ventricular regions showing typical pathological changes of fibrofatty replacement but also in normal-appearing left ventricle and interventricular septum, including the subendocardium in these areas. In all ARVC samples, plakoglobin signal levels were either absent or obviously reduced in comparison with those in control samples, such that the difference was immediately apparent on inspection.

Signal levels for plakophilin 2 and desmoplakin varied in the ARVC samples (Figure 1). The expression of plakophilin 2 at intercalated disks was indistinguishable from that in control samples, but the level of desmoplakin was clearly diminished in samples from subjects bearing a frameshift or nonsense mutation in desmoplakin (Subjects A1 and A2) and from a subject with a plakoglobin mutation (Subject A4) (Table 1). Signal levels for plakophilin 2 and desmoplakin appeared to be normal in tissue from a subject bearing a missense mutation in desmoplakin (Subject A3), whereas signal levels for both plakophilin 2 and desmoplakin were reduced in samples from subjects with mutations in plakophilin 2 or desmoglein 2 (Subjects A5, A6, A7, and A8) and in samples from subjects in whom no desmosomal gene mutations were identified (Subjects A9, A10, and A11). Myocardial samples from all 11 subjects with ARVC showed marked reductions in the amount of junctional signal for the major gap-junction protein, connexin 43, whereas a strong signal for the non-desmosomal adhesion molecule N-cadherin was always present and was indistinguishable from that in control samples (Figure 1).

Other Forms of End-Stage Heart Disease

To determine whether a reduced signal level for plakoglobin at intercalated disks is specific for ARVC or is merely a marker of cardiac disease, we immunostained transmural sections of left and right ventricular free walls and interventricular septum from the native hearts of subjects who had undergone cardiac transplantation for end-stage heart disease. This set of tissue samples came from 15 subjects with end-stage heart disease: 5 subjects each with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, or ischemic heart disease. We compared these samples with the 10 control samples used in the initial analysis of subjects known to have ARVC. In every case, the native hearts of the subjects who had undergone cardiac transplantation showed high plakoglobin signal levels at intercalated disks, which were indistinguishable from the signal levels in control samples (Figure 2Figure 2Immunofluorescence Images of Myocardium from a Control Subject and from Three Subjects with End-Stage Heart Disease.).

Signal levels for plakophilin 2 and N-cadherin at intercalated disks also appeared to be normal, whereas all samples from subjects with end-stage heart failure had clearly diminished expression of connexin 43. The desmoplakin signal at cell–cell junctions was indistinguishable from that in control samples from subjects with hypertrophic or ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, the signal level for desmoplakin varied in samples from subjects with dilated cardiomyopathy: there was a diminished level in two subjects, a level that was similar to that in control subjects in two subjects, and an apparently increased level in one subject. Taken together, these results suggest that a diminished signal level for plakoglobin is a consistent feature of ARVC but not of other forms of severe heart disease.

Blinded Analysis of Biopsy Samples

To determine the ability of immunostaining to identify patients with ARVC, we examined 30 heart-biopsy samples from subjects who had been evaluated in the Johns Hopkins ARVC Registry. These samples were from 11 subjects who fulfilled the clinical criteria for ARVC,5 14 subjects who did not fulfill clinical criteria and were considered not to have ARVC, and 5 subjects who were deemed to be “borderline” regarding clinical criteria for ARVC.

Each of the subjects had been evaluated with a detailed history taking and physical examination, 12-lead electrocardiography, signal-averaged electrocardiography, Doppler echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), right ventricular angiography, electrophysiological testing, and conventional right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy, according to protocols described previously.9,10 Clinical and immunohistochemical diagnoses for these subjects are shown in Table 2Table 2Clinical and Immunohistochemical Diagnoses in Blinded Analysis of Cardiac-Biopsy Specimens.. Representative immunofluorescence images are shown in Figure 3Figure 3Immunofluorescence Images of Endomyocardial-Biopsy Samples from Two Subjects with ARVC and Two Subjects without ARVC..

We observed reduced plakoglobin and normal N-cadherin signal levels, which we interpreted to indicate the presence of ARVC, in biopsy samples from 12 subjects. Of these subjects, 10 were considered to have ARVC, and 1 (Subject 22) was thought not to have ARVC on the basis of clinical criteria. The remaining subject (Subject 3) fell into the borderline group. Normal signal levels for plakoglobin and N-cadherin, which we used as the basis for ruling out ARVC, were seen in 13 subjects. These subjects included 10 in whom ARVC was ruled out by clinical criteria, 1 who was thought to have ARVC on the basis of clinical criteria (Subject 10), and 2 who were in the borderline category (Subjects 18 and 19). Finally, we observed reduced signal levels for both plakoglobin and N-cadherin in five subjects (Subjects 11, 12, 27, 28, and 30), which we interpreted to indicate poor tissue quality that precluded immunohistochemical diagnosis. Thus, we correctly diagnosed ARVC in 10 of 11 subjects with documented ARVC and correctly ruled out ARVC in 10 of 11 subjects without ARVC. We diagnosed ARVC in one of three subjects in the borderline group.

The one subject who had a reduced signal level for plakoglobin but did not have ARVC (as defined by clinical criteria) had received a diagnosis of sarcoidosis on the basis of the presence of noncaseating granulomas when the biopsy sample was initially examined. However, granulomas were not seen in the sections of this biopsy sample that were prepared for immunostaining. The one subject who had a normal level of plakoglobin but who fulfilled the clinical criteria for ARVC had a family history of ARVC, as confirmed on autopsy, but was asymptomatic himself. Clinical evaluation before gallbladder surgery revealed nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and T-wave inversions in V1 through V3 on electrocardiography, and MRI showed fatty infiltration of the right ventricle with regional dyskinesis, findings that fulfilled clinical criteria for the disease. The biopsy sample showed focal interstitial fibrosis but no fat.

Table 1 in the Supplementary Appendix shows a statistical analysis of the ability of the immunohistochemical test to correctly diagnose ARVC in biopsy samples obtained from 22 subjects in whom there was a definitive diagnosis on the basis of clinical criteria and in which immunohistochemical interpretation was possible. In this data set, a reduced level of plakoglobin had a sensitivity of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59 to 100), a specificity of 82% (95% CI, 48 to 98), a positive predictive value of 83% (95% CI, 52 to 98), and a negative predictive value of 90% (95% CI, 56 to 100). When data from the analysis of samples from 11 subjects with known ARVC and 10 control subjects were added to the blinded analysis of biopsy samples, the values increased to a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI, 77 to 100), a specificity of 90% (95% CI, 70 to 99), a positive predictive value of 91% (95% CI, 72 to 99), and a negative predictive value of 95% (95% CI, 75 to 100).

The extent to which independent observers agreed about the diagnosis of ARVC was measured for two independently stained preparations of the same slides, according to the method described by Landis and Koch.11 Interobserver agreement was high, as indicated by a kappa of 1.0 for the first set of stained slides and of 0.72 for the second set of stained slides (Table 1 in the Supplementary Appendix). Intraobserver agreement was 0.72 for Observer 1 and 0.82 for Observer 2, indicating a high degree of reproducibility.

Conventional Immunoperoxidase Analysis

Diagnostic immunohistochemical analysis in hospital-based clinical laboratories typically involves detection with the use of immunoperoxidase rather than immunofluorescence. To determine whether diminished plakoglobin levels in patients with ARVC can be identified with the use of immunoperoxidase methods, we had representative samples stained in the diagnostic immunohistochemistry laboratory at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. The ARVC samples showed discernible junctional signal levels of plakoglobin when analyzed by immunoperoxidase at antibody dilutions used in immunofluorescence studies. This finding was presumably caused by the considerable signal amplification involved in peroxidase methods. However, extensive dilution of the primary antiplakoglobin antibody (approximately 1:50,000) resulted in a clear distinction between ARVC and control samples (Fig. 1 in the Supplementary Appendix). These results suggest that the apparent absence of or reduction in signal in immunofluorescence preparations does not reflect a total lack of plakoglobin protein at cell junctions in samples from subjects with ARVC. Rather, plakoglobin is probably present in reduced concentrations or in different protein-binding complexes such that immunofluorescence detection is greatly decreased.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that reduced immunoreactive signal levels of plakoglobin at intercalated disks is a consistent feature in patients with ARVC and is not seen in other forms of heart-muscle disease. Our results also show that the immunoreactive level of the nondesmosomal adhesion molecule N-cadherin is normal in patients with ARVC and those with other forms of heart disease. Although a few subjects in our study had reduced N-cadherin signal levels, this finding was always associated with reduced signal for all other junctional proteins and presumably reflected generalized, nonspecific protein degradation. Thus, assessment of N-cadherin staining provided a reliable internal control for tissue quality. Whereas the combination of a diminished level of plakoglobin and a normal level of N-cadherin indicated a high likelihood of ARVC, diminished levels of both plakoglobin and N-cadherin indicated poor tissue quality, precluding diagnostic interpretation.

Additional validation studies will be required before this new test can be used clinically. For example, we used only a single antiplakoglobin antibody, which recognizes an epitope in the N-terminal. It binds to wild-type plakoglobin and to the two known mutant forms of plakoglobin implicated in the development of ARVC. We do not know whether similar results would be obtained with the use of other antiplakoglobin antibodies or whether the observed staining abnormalities depended on the binding domain of plakoglobin or its binding partners. We also do not know whether all potential causes of ARVC result in a diminished level of plakoglobin at intercalated disks. For example, viral infection (myocarditis) has been associated with ARVC in some patients, which suggests that acquired causes may also lead to disease. Since some patients with ARVC who were analyzed in the first part of our study had no identifiable desmosomal gene mutations, they may have had an acquired cause, and each had a reduced level of plakoglobin at intercalated disks. It is also possible that some subjects from the Hopkins ARVC registry had myocarditis, but this question will require further study.

Although myocardial degeneration and fibrofatty replacement occur preferentially in the right ventricle in patients with ARVC, we observed a diffuse reduction in the level of plakoglobin, not only in areas of the right ventricle showing typical pathological features but also in the left ventricle and interventricular septum, which otherwise appeared to be structurally normal. We also observed reduced plakoglobin signal levels in subendocardial myocytes, which are usually spared in ARVC. These observations suggest that it is not necessary to biopsy the heart in areas showing structural changes in order to diagnose ARVC. A conventional endomyocardial biopsy of the right side of the interventricular septum would reliably show this diagnostic change. It is also possible that equivalent diagnostic information could be derived from more accessible tissues containing desmosomes, such as skin, hair follicles, and buccal mucosa.

Signal levels for the major ventricular gap-junction protein, connexin 43, were clearly diminished in every subject with ARVC we examined in this study. Like plakoglobin, connexin 43 signal levels were reduced diffusely throughout the heart. These observations add to a growing body of literature indicating that the remodeling of gap junctions is a fundamental feature of ARVC.6,7,12,13 Of course, a reduced signal level for connexin 43 is not specific for patients with ARVC. Diminished expression of connexin 43, which reflects the remodeling of gap junctions, has been well documented in ischemic and nonischemic forms of heart-muscle disease,14,15 and we observed reduced signal levels for connexin 43 at intercalated disks in virtually all the tissue samples from subjects with end-stage hypertrophic, dilated, and ischemic cardiomyopathies. However, such reduced expression is most apparent in advanced disease, in which there has been considerable structural remodeling of the heart.14,15 In contrast, the remodeling of gap junctions in patients with ARVC occurs diffusely in regions of the heart that show no apparent structural or functional alterations. This is a potentially important distinction, which hints at disease-specific mechanisms and suggests that gap-junction remodeling causes conduction abnormalities that promote arrhythmias in ARVC.

Our findings do not indicate that plakoglobin is absent from intercalated disks in ARVC. Using highly sensitive immunoperoxidase methods, we observed discernible junctional plakoglobin signal levels in a known ARVC specimen in which little or no signal was seen with the less sensitive method of indirect immunofluorescence. However, when the primary antiplakoglobin antibody that was used in the immunoperoxidase assay was diluted to a very low concentration (1:50,000 dilution), a clear distinction between ARVC and control tissue emerged. Thus, conditions can be defined in which conventional immunoperoxidase staining of a standard biopsy sample of right ventricular endomyocardium may be used as a diagnostic test for ARVC. Such a test could be performed in most pathology departments in which immunoperoxidase has become a standard method of tissue diagnostics.

Our results are promising in terms of developing a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical test for the diagnosis of ARVC. Previous studies of the diagnostic use of MRI,16,17 electrocardiography,18,19 and echocardiography20 in patients with ARVC have generally reported high sensitivity and specificity in patients with advanced disease but much lower values in patients with earlier or less conspicuous disease. Further studies are needed to fully determine the ability of immunohistochemical testing to accurately identify ARVC before the development of extensive fibrofatty infiltration and the formation of right ventricular aneurysms, which typically produce diagnostic findings on noninvasive tests.

We do not yet know the molecular mechanism responsible for the consistent reduction in plakoglobin signal levels at intercalated disks in patients with ARVC. Nevertheless, the remarkable consistency of this reduction suggests that a shift in plakoglobin from junctional to intracellular or intranuclear pools may play a role in the pathogenesis of the disease. It should be stressed that the immunohistochemical methods used in this study were specifically designed to identify a high concentration of protein at cell–cell junctions and would not necessarily detect increased amounts of plakoglobin within cytoplasmic or nuclear sites, where the local concentration would probably be much lower than in desmosomes. If such a shift occurs in patients with ARVC, then resultant changes in signaling, perhaps through Wnt–β-catenin pathways, could contribute to myocyte injury and subsequent clinicopathological changes in ARVC. Recent studies have provided support for this mechanism.21,22

In conclusion, we have developed a new diagnostic test for ARVC that could prove useful if adopted in clinical practice. Further research is required to confirm the diagnostic usefulness of this approach and elucidate pathophysiological implications of altered plakoglobin signal levels at intercalated disks in patients with ARVC.

Supported by grants from the March of Dimes (to Dr. Saffitz); from the British Heart Foundation and the Heart Rhythm Society (to Dr. Asimaki); from the National Institutes of Health (K23HL093350, to Dr. Tandri); from the Lerner Fund (to Dr. Huang); from the Bogle Foundation, St. Jude Medical Foundation, the Healing Hearts Foundation, the Campanella family, and the Wilmerding Endowments (to Drs. Halushka and Calkins); from the Cassa di Risparmio de Padova e Rovigo (CARIPARO) Foundation (to Drs. Basso and Thiene); and from the British Heart Foundation and United Kingdom National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres (to Dr. McKenna).

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

We thank the subjects and their families who made this work possible.

Source Information

From the Departments of Pathology (A.A., J.E.S.) and Medicine (S.G.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston; the Heart Hospital, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Trust, London (A.A., W.J.M.); the Departments of Medicine (H.T., H.C.) and Pathology (M.K.H.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; the Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (H.H.); the Cardiovascular Pathology Unit, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy (C.B., G.T.); and Yiannis Protonotarios Medical Center, Naxos, Greece (A.T., N.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Saffitz at the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    Marcus FI, Fontaine G, Guiraudon G, et al. Right ventricular dysplasia: a report of 24 adult cases. Circulation 1982;65:384-398
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Thiene G, Nava A, Corrado D, Rossi L, Pennelli N. Right ventricular cardiomyopathy and sudden death in young people. N Engl J Med 1988;318:129-133
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Dalal D, Nasir K, Bomma C, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: a United States experience. Circulation 2005;112:3823-3832
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Sen-Chowdhry S, Syrris P, McKenna WJ. Role of genetic analysis in the management of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:1813-1821
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    McKenna WJ, Thiene G, Nava A, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J 1994;71:215-218
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Kaplan SR, Gard JJ, Protonotarios N, et al. Remodeling of myocyte gap junctions in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy due to a deletion in plakoglobin (Naxos disease). Heart Rhythm 2004;1:3-11
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Kaplan SR, Gard JJ, Carvajal-Huerta L, Ruiz-Cabezas JC, Thiene G, Saffitz JE. Structural and molecular pathology of the heart in Carvajal syndrome. Cardiovasc Pathol 2004;13:26-32
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Tandri H, Asimaki A, Dalal D, Saffitz JE, Halushka MK, Calkins H. Gap junction remodeling in a case of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia due to plakophilin-2 mutation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008;19:1212-1214
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Marcus F, Towbin JA, Zareba W, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C): a multidisciplinary study: design and protocol. Circulation 2003;107:2975-2978
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Tandri H, Calkins H, Nasir K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients meeting task force criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003;14:476-482
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Basso C, Czarnowska E, Della Barbera M, et al. Ultrastructural evidence of intercalated disc remodelling in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: an electron microscopy investigation on endomyocardial biopsies. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1847-1854
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Oxford EM, Everitt M, Coombs W, et al. Molecular composition of the intercalated disk in a spontaneous canine animal model of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:1196-1205
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Peters NS, Green CR, Poole-Wilson PA, Severs NJ. Reduced content of connexin43 gap junctions in ventricular myocardium from hypertrophied and ischemic human hearts. Circulation 1993;88:864-875
    Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Nattel S, Maguy A, Le Bouter S, Yeh YH. Arrhythmogenic ion-channel remodeling in the heart: heart failure, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. Physiol Rev 2007;87:425-456
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Maksimovic R, Ekinci O, Reiner C, et al. The value of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Eur Radiol 2006;16:560-568
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Dewilde W, Boersma L, Delanote J, et al. Symptomatic arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: a two-centre retrospective study of 15 symptomatic ARVD/C cases and focus on the diagnostic value of MRI in symptomatic ARVD/C patients. Acta Cardiol 2008;63:181-189
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Nasir K, Bomma C, Tandri H, et al. Electrocardiographic features of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy according to disease severity: a need to broaden diagnostic criteria. Circulation 2004;110:1527-1534[Erratum, Circulation 2004;110:3384.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Peters S, Trummel M, Koehler B, Westermann KU. The value of different electrocardiographic depolarization criteria in the diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. J Electrocardiol 2007;40:34-37
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Yoerger DM, Marcus F, Sherrill D, et al. Echocardiographic findings in patients meeting task force criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia: new insights from the Multidisciplinary Study of Right Ventricular Dysplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:860-865
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Garcia-Gras E, Lombardi R, Giocondo MJ, et al. Suppression of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling by nuclear plakoglobin recapitulates phenotype of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. J Clin Invest 2006;116:2012-2021
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Asimaki A, Syrris P, Wichter T, Matthias P, Saffitz JE, McKenna WJ. A novel dominant mutation in plakoglobin causes arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Am J Hum Genet 2007;81:964-973
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (75)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    J. Gomes, M. Finlay, A. K. Ahmed, E. J. Ciaccio, A. Asimaki, J. E. Saffitz, G. Quarta, M. Nobles, P. Syrris, S. Chaubey, W. J. McKenna, A. Tinker, P. D. Lambiase. (2012) Electrophysiological abnormalities precede overt structural changes in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy due to mutations in desmoplakin-A combined murine and human study. European Heart Journal
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    V. Hariharan, J. Provost, S. Shah, E. Konofagou, H. Huang. (2012) Elevated Strain and Structural Disarray Occur at the Right Ventricular Apex. Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Julie Munkholm, Alex H. Christensen, Jesper H. Svendsen, Claus B. Andersen. (2012) Usefulness of Immunostaining for Plakoglobin as a Diagnostic Marker of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology 109:2, 272-275
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Nicola Monteforte, Carlo Napolitano, Silvia G. Priori. (2012) Genetics and Arrhythmias: Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Nicola Monteforte, Carlo Napolitano, Silvia G. Priori. (2012) Genética y arritmias: aplicaciones diagnósticas y pronósticas. Revista Española de Cardiología
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    G. Quarta, P. Syrris, M. Ashworth, S. Jenkins, K. Zuborne Alapi, J. Morgan, A. Muir, A. Pantazis, W. J. McKenna, P. M. Elliott. (2011) Mutations in the Lamin A/C gene mimic arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. European Heart Journal
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Warren Smith. (2011) Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. Heart, Lung and Circulation 20:12, 757-760
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    André G. Kléber. (2011) Gap junctions and conduction of cardiac excitation. Heart Rhythm 8:12, 1981-1984
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Ornella Leone, John P. Veinot, Annalisa Angelini, Ulrik T. Baandrup, Cristina Basso, Gerald Berry, Patrick Bruneval, Margaret Burke, Jagdish Butany, Fiorella Calabrese, Giulia d'Amati, William D. Edwards, John T. Fallon, Michael C. Fishbein, Patrick J. Gallagher, Marc K. Halushka, Bruce McManus, Angela Pucci, E. René Rodriguez, Jeffrey E. Saffitz, Mary N. Sheppard, Charles Steenbergen, James R. Stone, Carmela Tan, Gaetano Thiene, Allard C. van der Wal, Gayle L. Winters. (2011) 2011 Consensus statement on endomyocardial biopsy from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology and the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology. Cardiovascular Pathology
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Valeria Mezzano, Farah Sheikh. (2011) Cell–cell junction remodeling in the heart: Possible role in cardiac conduction system function and arrhythmias?. Life Sciences
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Cristina Basso, Barbara Bauce, Domenico Corrado, Gaetano Thiene. (2011) Pathophysiology of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Nature Reviews Cardiology
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Angeliki Asimaki, Jeffrey E. Saffitz. (2011) Gap junctions and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Makarand Deo, Priscila Y. Sato, Hassan Musa, Xianming Lin, Sandeep V. Pandit, Mario Delmar, Omer Berenfeld. (2011) Relative contribution of changes in sodium current versus intercellular coupling on reentry initiation in 2-dimensional preparations of plakophilin-2–deficient cardiac cells. Heart Rhythm 8:11, 1740-1748
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Gaetano Thiene. (2011) Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: from autopsy to genes and transgenic mice (SCVP Achievement Award Lecture, San Antonio, TX, February 27, 2011). Cardiovascular Pathology
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    David J. Milan, Moshe Rav Acha. (2011) Recovery of Myocardial Tissue from Extracted Leads. Heart Rhythm
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Jarett E. Michaelson, Hayden Huang. (2011) Cell–Cell Junctional Proteins in Cardiovascular Mechanotransduction. Annals of Biomedical Engineering
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Katja Gehmlich, Petros Syrris, Mareike Reimann, Angeliki Asimaki, Elisabeth Ehler, Alison Evans, Giovanni Quarta, Antonis Pantazis, Jeffrey E. Saffitz, William J. McKenna. (2011) Molecular changes in the heart of a severe case of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy caused by a desmoglein-2 null allele. Cardiovascular Pathology
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    AH Christensen, CB Andersen, A Tybjaerg-Hansen, S Haunso, JH Svendsen. (2011) Mutation analysis and evaluation of the cardiac localization of TMEM43 in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Clinical Genetics 80:3, 256-264
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    John P. Veinot. (2011) Endomyocardial biopsy—when and how?. Cardiovascular Pathology 20:5, 291-296
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Maria E. Campian, Hanno L. Tan, Astrid F. Moerkerken, Raymond Tukkie, Berthe L. F. Eck-Smit, Hein J. Verberne. (2011) Imaging of programmed cell death in arrhythmogenic right ventricle cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 38:8, 1500-1506
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Gaetano Thiene, Domenico Corrado, Barbara Bauce, Cristina Basso. (2011) Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: A Historical Overview. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics 3:2, 179-191
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Srijita Sen-Chowdhry, Petros Syrris, Giovanni Quarta, William J. McKenna. (2011) Clinical Impact of Genetics in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics 3:2, 205-215
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Cristina Basso, Kalliopi Pilichou, Elisa Carturan, Stefania Rizzo, Barbara Bauce, Gaetano Thiene. (2011) Pathobiology of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics 3:2, 193-204
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Eva M. Oxford, Charles G. Danko, Bruce G. Kornreich, Karen Maass, Shari A. Hemsley, Dima Raskolnikov, Philip R. Fox, Mario Delmar, N. Sydney Moïse. (2011) Ultrastructural changes in cardiac myocytes from Boxer dogs with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Journal of Veterinary Cardiology 13:2, 101-113
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Richard N.W. Hauer, Moniek G.P.J. Cox. (2011) Twelve-Lead ECG in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics 3:2, 237-244
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    S. I. Sarvari, K. H. Haugaa, O.-G. Anfinsen, T. P. Leren, O. A. Smiseth, E. Kongsgaard, J. P. Amlie, T. Edvardsen. (2011) Right ventricular mechanical dispersion is related to malignant arrhythmias: a study of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and subclinical right ventricular dysfunction. European Heart Journal 32:9, 1089-1096
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Katja Gehmlich, Pier D. Lambiase, Angeliki Asimaki, Edward J. Ciaccio, Elisabeth Ehler, Petros Syrris, Jeffrey E. Saffitz, William J. McKenna. (2011) A novel desmocollin-2 mutation reveals insights into the molecular link between desmosomes and gap junctions. Heart Rhythm 8:5, 711-718
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Koichi Maeda, Nobuo Sakagoshi, Ryohei Matsuura, Yasuhisa Shimazaki. (2011) Mitral Valve Repair, Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty, and Ligation of Coronary Artery-Pulmonary Trunk Fistula in a Patient with Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. Journal of Cardiac Surgery 26:3, 274-276
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Jeffrey A. Towbin. (2011) Desmosomal gene variants in patients with “possible ARVC”. Heart Rhythm 8:5, 719-720
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Schwartz, Robert S., , Watkins, Hugh, Ashrafian, Houman, Redwood, Charles, . (2011) Inherited Cardiomyopathies. New England Journal of Medicine 364:17, 1643-1656
    Full Text

  31. 31

    2011. Inherited Heart Diseases. , 295-337.
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    K. Gehmlich, P. Syrris, E. Peskett, A. Evans, E. Ehler, A. Asimaki, A. Anastasakis, A. Tsatsopoulou, A.-I. Vouliotis, C. Stefanadis, J. E. Saffitz, N. Protonotarios, W. J. McKenna. (2011) Mechanistic insights into arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy caused by desmocollin-2 mutations. Cardiovascular Research 90:1, 77-87
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Jeffrey E. Saffitz. (2011) The Pathobiology of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy. Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease 6:1, 299-321
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Hugh Calkins. (2011) Use of Mouse Models to Evaluate Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Treatment of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 57:6, 751-752
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Larissa Fabritz, Mark G. Hoogendijk, Brendon P. Scicluna, Shirley C.M. van Amersfoorth, Lisa Fortmueller, Susanne Wolf, Sandra Laakmann, Nina Kreienkamp, Ilaria Piccini, Günter Breithardt, Patricia Ruiz Noppinger, Henning Witt, Klaus Ebnet, Thomas Wichter, Bodo Levkau, Werner W. Franke, Sebastian Pieperhoff, Jacques M.T. de Bakker, Ruben Coronel, Paulus Kirchhof. (2011) Load-Reducing Therapy Prevents Development of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy in Plakoglobin-Deficient Mice. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 57:6, 740-750
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    ANGELIKI ASIMAKI, JEFFREY E. SAFFITZ. (2011) The Role of Endomyocardial Biopsy in ARVC: Looking Beyond Histology in Search of New Diagnostic Markers. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 22:1, 111-117
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Samuel Wang, Wei Zhu, Robert M. Hamilton, Joel A. Kirsh, Elizabeth A. Stephenson, Gil J. Gross. (2010) Diagnosis-specific characteristics of ventricular tachycardia in children with structurally normal hearts. Heart Rhythm 7:12, 1725-1731
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Harsh C. Patel, Hugh Calkins. (2010) Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 12:6, 598-613
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Maria E. Campian, Hein J. Verberne, Maxim Hardziyenka, Elisabeth A. A. Groot, Astrid F. Moerkerken, Berthe L. F. Eck-Smit, Hanno L. Tan. (2010) Assessment of inflammation in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 37:11, 2079-2085
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    P.A. Zwaag, M.G.P.J. Cox, C. Werf, A.C.P. Wiesfeld, J.D.H. Jongbloed, D. Dooijes, H. Bikker, R. Jongbloed, A.J.H. Suurmeijer, M.P. Berg, R.M.W. Hofstra, R.N.W. Hauer, A.A.M. Wilde, J.P. Tintelen. (2010) Recurrent and founder mutations in the Netherlands. Netherlands Heart Journal 18:12, 583-591
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Katja Gehmlich, Angeliki Asimaki, Thomas J. Cahill, Elisabeth Ehler, Petros Syrris, Elisabetta Zachara, Federica Re, Andrea Avella, Lorenzo Monserrat, Jeffrey E. Saffitz, William J. McKenna. (2010) Novel missense mutations in exon 15 of desmoglein-2: Role of the intracellular cadherin segment in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy?. Heart Rhythm 7:10, 1446-1453
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Lucio Capulzini, Pedro Brugada, Josep Brugada, Ramon Brugada. (2010) Arritmias y enfermedades del corazón derecho: de las bases genéticas a la clínica. Revista Española de Cardiología 63:8, 963-983
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Karen Maass. (2010) Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy and Desmin: Another gene fits the shoe. Heart Rhythm 7:8, 1065-1066
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Gregory M. Marcus, Melvin M. Scheinman, Edmund Keung. (2010) The Year in Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 56:8, 667-676
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Ellen Otten, Angeliki Asimaki, Alexander Maass, Irene M. van Langen, Allard van der Wal, Nicolaas de Jonge, Maarten P. van den Berg, Jeffrey E. Saffitz, Arthur A.M. Wilde, Jan D.H. Jongbloed, J. Peter van Tintelen. (2010) Desmin mutations as a cause of right ventricular heart failure affect the intercalated disks. Heart Rhythm 7:8, 1058-1064
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Rita M Cabral, Lu Liu, Carol Hogan, Patricia J C Dopping-Hepenstal, Beatriz C Winik, Raúl A Asial, Richard Dobson, Charles A Mein, Patricia A Baselaga, Jemima E Mellerio, Arti Nanda, Maria del Carmen Boente, David P Kelsell, John A McGrath, Andrew P South. (2010) Homozygous Mutations in the 5′ Region of the JUP Gene Result in Cutaneous Disease but Normal Heart Development in Children. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 130:6, 1543-1550
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Jeffrey E. Saffitz, Angeliki Asimaki, Hayden Huang. (2010) Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: new insights into mechanisms of disease. Cardiovascular Pathology 19:3, 166-170
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Raffaella Lombardi, Ali J Marian. (2010) Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy is a disease of cardiac stem cells. Current Opinion in Cardiology 25:3, 222-228
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Thomas E Callis, Brian C Jensen, Karen E Weck, Monte S Willis. (2010) Evolving molecular diagnostics for familial cardiomyopathies: at the heart of it all. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 10:3, 329-351
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    ELENA ARBELO, MARK E. JOSEPHSON. (2010) Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 21:4, 473-486
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    M\[ytilde] G Mahoney, Sara Sadowski, Donna Brennan, Pekka Pikander, Pekka Saukko, James Wahl, Heikki Aho, Kristiina Heikinheimo, Leena Bruckner-Tuderman, Andrzej Fertala, Juha Peltonen, Jouni Uitto, Sirkku Peltonen. (2010) Compound Heterozygous Desmoplakin Mutations Result in a Phenotype with a Combination of Myocardial, Skin, Hair, and Enamel Abnormalities. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 130:4, 968-978
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Brian Olshansky, Mario Delmar, Gordon F. Tomaselli. (2010) The year in arrhythmias—2009: Part I. Heart Rhythm 7:3, 417-426
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Srijita Sen-Chowdhry, Robert D. Morgan, John C. Chambers, William J. McKenna. (2010) Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Annual Review of Medicine 61:1, 233-253
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    James W. Smyth, Ting-Ting Hong, Danchen Gao, Jacob M. Vogan, Brian C. Jensen, Tina S. Fong, Paul C. Simpson, Didier Y.R. Stainier, Neil C. Chi, Robin M. Shaw. (2010) Limited forward trafficking of connexin 43 reduces cell-cell coupling in stressed human and mouse myocardium. Journal of Clinical Investigation 120:1, 266-279
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Lori A. Blauwet, Leslie T. Cooper. (2010) Myocarditis. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52:4, 274-288
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Sebastian Pieperhoff, Mareike Barth, Steffen Rickelt, Werner W. Franke. (2010) Desmosomal Molecules In and Out of Adhering Junctions: Normal and Diseased States of Epidermal, Cardiac and Mesenchymally Derived Cells. Dermatology Research and Practice 2010, 1-12
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Shi-Joon Yoo, Lars Grosse-Wortmann, Robert M. Hamilton. (2010) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia in Children. Korean Circulation Journal 40:8, 357
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    C Barahona-Dussault, B Benito, O Campuzano, A Iglesias, TL Leung, L Robb, M Talajic, R Brugada. (2010) Role of genetic testing in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Clinical Genetics 77:1, 37-48
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Jeffrey E. Saffitz, Calum A. MacRae. (2010) Mutations in desmosomal protein genes and the pathogenesis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm 7:1, 30-32
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Jifen Li, Glenn L. Radice. (2010) A New Perspective on Intercalated Disc Organization: Implications for Heart Disease. Dermatology Research and Practice 2010, 1-5
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Steven J Fowler, Carlo Napolitano, Silvia G Priori. (2010) When is genetic testing useful in patients suspected to have inherited cardiac arrhythmias?. Current Opinion in Cardiology 25:1, 37-45
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Steven J. Fowler, Carlo Napolitano, Silvia G. Priori. (2009) The genetics of cardiomyopathy: Genotyping and genetic counseling. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 11:6, 433-446
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Daniel P. Judge. (2009) Phenotypic diversity arising from a single mutation. Heart Rhythm 6:11, 1584-1585
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    J. Peter van Tintelen, Isabelle C. Van Gelder, Angeliki Asimaki, Albert J.H. Suurmeijer, Ans C.P. Wiesfeld, Jan D.H. Jongbloed, Arthur van den Wijngaard, Jan B.M. Kuks, Karin Y. van Spaendonck-Zwarts, Nicolette Notermans, Ludolf Boven, Freek van den Heuvel, Hermine E. Veenstra-Knol, Jeffrey E. Saffitz, Robert M.W. Hofstra, Maarten P. van den Berg. (2009) Severe cardiac phenotype with right ventricular predominance in a large cohort of patients with a single missense mutation in the DES gene. Heart Rhythm 6:11, 1574-1583
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    S. Gattenlohner, P. Demmer, M. Oberhoff, G. Ertl. (2009) Acute episode of an arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy with vast necroses exclusively in right ventricular myocardium. European Heart Journal 30:20, 2430-2430
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Richard N. W. Hauer. (2009) Toward early diagnosis in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 26:1, 1-2
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Amanda E Bass-Zubek, Lisa M Godsel, Mario Delmar, Kathleen J Green. (2009) Plakophilins: multifunctional scaffolds for adhesion and signaling. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 21:5, 708-716
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Werner W. Franke, Steffen Rickelt, Mareike Barth, Sebastian Pieperhoff. (2009) The junctions that don’t fit the scheme: special symmetrical cell-cell junctions of their own kind. Cell and Tissue Research 338:1, 1-17
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Geoffrey G Hesketh, Jennifer E Van Eyk, Gordon F Tomaselli. (2009) Mechanisms of Gap Junction Traffic in Health and Disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 54:4, 263-272
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Kent R Nilsson, Vann Bennett. (2009) Ankyrin-based Patterning of Membrane Microdomains: New Insights Into a Novel Class of Cardiovascular Diseases. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 54:2, 106-115
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Jeffrey E. Saffitz. (2009) Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and abnormalities of cell-to-cell coupling. Heart Rhythm 6:8, S62-S65
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Maria C. Bolling, Marcel F. Jonkman. (2009) Skin and heart: une liaison dangereuse. Experimental Dermatology 18:8, 658-668
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    J. Peter van Tintelen, Richard N. W. Hauer. (2009) Cardiomyopathies: New test for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Nature Reviews Cardiology 6:7, 450-451
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    (2009) Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. New England Journal of Medicine 360:26, 2784-2786
    Full Text

  75. 75

    Leif-Hendrik Boldt, Wilhelm Haverkamp. (2009) Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Herz 34:4, 290-297
    CrossRef

Letters