Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Pim A.L. Tonino, M.D., Bernard De Bruyne, M.D., Ph.D., Nico H.J. Pijls, M.D., Ph.D., Uwe Siebert, M.D., M.P.H., Sc.D., Fumiaki Ikeno, M.D., Marcel van `t Veer, M.Sc., Volker Klauss, M.D., Ph.D., Ganesh Manoharan, M.D., Thomas Engstrøm, M.D., Ph.D., Keith G. Oldroyd, M.D., Peter N. Ver Lee, M.D., Philip A. MacCarthy, M.D., Ph.D., and William F. Fearon, M.D. for the FAME Study Investigators

N Engl J Med 2009; 360:213-224January 15, 2009

Abstract

Background

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary angiography is the standard method for guiding the placement of the stent. It is unclear whether routine measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR; the ratio of maximal blood flow in a stenotic artery to normal maximal flow), in addition to angiography, improves outcomes.

Methods

In 20 medical centers in the United States and Europe, we randomly assigned 1005 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease to undergo PCI with implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by angiography alone or guided by FFR measurements in addition to angiography. Before randomization, lesions requiring PCI were identified on the basis of their angiographic appearance. Patients assigned to angiography-guided PCI underwent stenting of all indicated lesions, whereas those assigned to FFR-guided PCI underwent stenting of indicated lesions only if the FFR was 0.80 or less. The primary end point was the rate of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 1 year.

Results

The mean (±SD) number of indicated lesions per patient was 2.7±0.9 in the angiography group and 2.8±1.0 in the FFR group (P=0.34). The number of stents used per patient was 2.7±1.2 and 1.9±1.3, respectively (P<0.001). The 1-year event rate was 18.3% (91 patients) in the angiography group and 13.2% (67 patients) in the FFR group (P=0.02). Seventy-eight percent of the patients in the angiography group were free from angina at 1 year, as compared with 81% of patients in the FFR group (P=0.20).

Conclusions

Routine measurement of FFR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents significantly reduces the rate of the composite end point of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00267774.)

Media in This Article

Figure 1Design of the Study.
Figure 2Study Enrollment and Randomization.
Article

The presence of myocardial ischemia is an important risk factor for an adverse clinical outcome.1-3 Revascularization of stenotic coronary lesions that induce ischemia can improve a patient's functional status and outcome.3-5 For stenotic lesions that do not induce ischemia, however, the benefit of revascularization is less clear, and medical therapy alone is likely to be equally effective.6,7

With the introduction of drug-eluting stents, the percentage of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease in whom percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed has increased.8,9 Because drug-eluting stents are expensive and are associated with potential late complications, their appropriate use is critical.10,11 However, in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, determining which lesions cause ischemia and warrant stenting can be difficult. Noninvasive stress imaging studies are limited in their ability to accurately localize ischemia-producing lesions in these patients.12 Although coronary angiography often underestimates or overestimates a lesion's functional severity, it is still the standard technique for guiding PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.13,14

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index of the physiological significance of a coronary stenosis and is defined as the ratio of maximal blood flow in a stenotic artery to normal maximal flow.15 It can be easily measured during coronary angiography by calculating the ratio of distal coronary pressure measured with a coronary pressure guidewire to aortic pressure measured simultaneously with the guiding catheter. FFR in a normal coronary artery equals 1.0. An FFR value of 0.80 or less identifies ischemia-causing coronary stenoses with an accuracy of more than 90%. 15-17 The information provided by FFR is similar to that obtained with myocardial perfusion studies, but it is more specific and has a better spatial resolution, because every artery or segment is analyzed separately, and masking of one ischemic area by another, more severely ischemic, zone is avoided. 12,18 Deferring PCI in nonischemic stenotic lesions as assessed by FFR is associated with an annual rate of death or myocardial infarction of approximately 1% in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease, which is lower than the rate after routine stenting.7 On the other hand, deferring PCI in lesions with an FFR of less than 0.75 to 0.80 may result in worse outcomes than those obtained with revascularization.19 Retrospective studies suggest that in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, FFR-guided PCI is associated with a favorable outcome with respect to event-free survival.20,21

For patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, identifying an approach to PCI that would result in a more judicious use of stents, while still achieving complete relief of myocardial ischemia, could improve the clinical outcome and decrease health care costs. The objective of this randomized study was to compare treatment based on the measurement of FFR in addition to angiography with the current practice of treatment guided solely by angiography in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease for whom PCI is the appropriate treatment.

Methods

Study Design

The design of this study has been described previously (Figure 1Figure 1Design of the Study.).22 In eligible patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, the investigator indicated which lesions had stenosis of at least 50% of their diameter and were thought to require PCI on the basis of angiographic appearance and clinical data. Patients were then randomly assigned to either angiography-guided or FFR-guided PCI. Computerized randomization was stratified according to study site and performed in blocks of 25, with the use of sealed envelopes. Patients assigned to angiography-guided PCI underwent stenting of all indicated lesions with drug-eluting stents. For patients assigned to FFR-guided PCI, FFR was measured in each diseased coronary artery, and drug-eluting stents (Endeavor [Medtronic], Cypher [Cordis], or Taxus [Boston Scientific], with the choice of stent at the discretion of the surgeon) were placed in indicated lesions only if the FFR was 0.80 or less.

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each participating center; all patients provided written informed consent. An independent clinical events committee whose members were unaware of treatment assignments adjudicated all events. Data management and statistical analysis were performed by an independent data coordinating center (University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria). The study sponsors (Radi Medical Systems, Stichting Vrienden van het Hart Zuidoost Brabant [Friends of the Heart Foundation], and Medtronic) had no role in the methods, data acquisition, data analysis, reporting, or publication of this study.

Study Population

Patients were included in the study if they had multivessel coronary artery disease, which was defined as coronary artery stenoses of at least 50% of the vessel diameter in at least two of the three major epicardial coronary arteries, and if PCI was indicated. Patients who had had a myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation could be included if the infarction had occurred at least 5 days before PCI. Patients who had had a myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation could be included earlier than 5 days after the infarction if the peak creatine kinase level was less than 1000 U per liter. Patients who had undergone previous PCI could be included in the study. Patients who had angiographically significant left main coronary artery disease, previous coronary-artery bypass surgery, cardiogenic shock, extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries, a life expectancy of less than 2 years, or a contraindication to the placement of drug-eluting stents and patients who were pregnant were excluded.

Treatment

PCI was performed with the use of standard techniques. Procedure time was defined as the interval between the introduction of the first guiding catheter and the removal of the last guiding catheter. A record was kept of all materials used, such as guiding catheters, guidewires, balloons, stents, and, if applicable, pressure wires and vials of adenosine. FFR was measured with a coronary pressure guidewire (Radi Medical Systems) at maximal hyperemia induced by intravenous adenosine, which was administered at a rate of 140 μg per kilogram of body weight per minute through a central vein. FFR is calculated as the mean distal coronary pressure (measured with the pressure wire) divided by the mean aortic pressure (measured simultaneously with the guiding catheter) during maximal hyperemia.23 In the case of diffuse atherosclerosis punctuated by focal areas of more severe stenosis, or in the case of more than one stenosis within the same artery, pressure pullback recordings during hyperemia were performed as described previously.18,22 Because FFR cannot be measured in a totally occluded artery before an intervention is performed, a default FFR value of 0.50 was recorded in the case of totally occluded arteries in the FFR group. All patients were treated with aspirin and clopidogrel for at least 1 year after PCI. If a patient underwent repeat coronary angiography during follow-up, the initially assigned strategy of angiography guidance or FFR guidance was followed in the case of stent placement.

End Points and Follow-up

The primary end point was the rate of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and any repeat revascularization. Secondary end points included the procedure time, the amount of contrast agent used, functional class at 1 year as assessed with the use of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification system, health-related quality of life (as measured by the score on the European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions [EQ-5D] scale),24 the number of antianginal medications used, and the individual components of the primary end point at 1 year, as well as the rates of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and 6 months. Cost-effectiveness was a secondary end point as well. Death was defined as death from all causes. Myocardial infarction was defined as an elevation of the creatine kinase MB fraction by a factor of 3 or more or new Q waves in 2 or more contiguous leads of the electrocardiogram (ECG).25 Levels of total creatine kinase and the creatine kinase MB fraction were measured in all patients between 12 and 24 hours after PCI. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed offline, and the scoring system used in the SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) study (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114972) was used to assess the extent and severity of coronary artery disease; the SYNTAX score was calculated by the core laboratory.26,27 After discharge, a follow-up assessment was performed at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year. Before PCI and at all other time points, the severity of angina, graded according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification system, and the number of antianginal medications prescribed were assessed. An ECG was obtained before PCI, within 24 hours after PCI, and at 1 year after PCI. The quality-of-life questionnaire (EQ-5D) was completed by the patient before PCI, at 1 month, and at 1 year.24,28

Statistical Analysis

The primary purpose of the data analysis was to determine whether the 1-year probability of major adverse cardiac events differed significantly between patients who underwent angiography-guided PCI and those who underwent FFR-guided PCI. The estimated minimum sample size of 426 patients in each group was based on a two-sided chi-square test with an alpha level of 0.05 and a statistical power of 0.80, assuming 1-year rates of major adverse cardiac events of 14% in the angiography group and 8% in the FFR group. These rates were based on outcome data in the early studies of drug-eluting stents that were available in 2005 when the present study was designed.29

All enrolled patients were included in the analysis of primary and secondary end points according to the intention-to-treat principle. Categorical variables, including the primary end point and its components, are expressed as proportions and were compared with the use of the chi-square test. Continuous variables are expressed as means and standard deviations and were compared with the use of an unpaired t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test. A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Kaplan–Meier curves are shown for the time-to-event distributions of the primary end point and its individual components. All statistical analyses were performed with the use of SAS software, version 9 (SAS Institute). One interim analysis was performed, immediately after inclusion of the first 50 patients, to monitor safety and to exclude any frank inconsistencies in the study protocol or case-record form.

Results

Baseline Characteristics and Angiographic Data

From January 2006 through September 2007, a total of 1005 patients were enrolled in 20 centers in the United States and Europe (Figure 2Figure 2Study Enrollment and Randomization.). Of the 1005 patients, 496 were randomly assigned to angiography-guided PCI and 509 to FFR-guided PCI. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, as were the number of indicated lesions, vessel and lesion dimensions as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography, and extent and severity of coronary artery disease as indicated by the SYNTAX score (Table 1Table 1Baseline Characteristics of the Patients.). A total of 26.5% of the patients in the angiography group had a left ventricular ejection fraction of 50.0% or less, as compared with 28.6% in the FFR group (P=0.47).

PCI

A total of 2415 stents were placed, of which 2339 (96.9%) were drug-eluting stents. In the case of 76 stenoses, a bare-metal stent had to be placed for technical reasons. Significantly more stents per patient were placed in the angiography group than in the FFR group (2.7±1.2 vs. 1.9±1.3, P<0.001) (Table 2Table 2Results of PCI.). In the FFR group, FFR was successfully measured in 94.0% of all lesions. In 874 lesions (63.0%), the FFR was 0.80 or less, and stents were placed in these lesions, per protocol. In 513 lesions (37.0%), the FFR was greater than 0.80, and stents were not placed in these lesions. The procedure time was similar in the two groups (70±44 minutes in the angiography group and 71±43 minutes in the FFR group, P=0.51). Significantly more contrast agent was used in the angiography group than in the FFR group (302±127 ml vs. 272±133 ml, P<0.001).

Primary End Point

Complete 1-year follow-up data were obtained for 98.1% of the patients (11 were lost to follow-up in the angiography group and 8 were lost to follow-up in the FFR group [P=0.45]). The primary end point (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization) occurred in 91 patients (18.3%) in the angiography group and in 67 (13.2%) in the FFR group (P=0.02) (Table 3Table 3Primary and Secondary End Points at 1 Year.). Event-free survival is shown by means of a Kaplan–Meier curve (Figure 3AFigure 3Kaplan–Meier Survival Curves According to Study Group.).

Secondary End Points

All-cause mortality at 1 year was 3.0% (15 deaths, 10 of which had cardiac causes) in the angiography group and 1.8% (9 deaths, 7 of which had cardiac causes) in the FFR group (P=0.19). Myocardial infarction occurred in 43 patients (8.7%) in the angiography group and in 29 (5.7%) in the FFR group (P=0.07). The numbers of small, periprocedural infarctions (as indicated by a creatine kinase MB fraction that was 3 to 5 times the upper limit of the normal range) were 16 and 12 in the two groups, respectively. A total of 47 patients (9.5%) in the angiography group and 33 (6.5%) in the FFR group required repeat revascularization (P=0.08). The 1-year rate of death or myocardial infarction, which was not a prespecified secondary end point but is an important clinical variable, was 11.1% (55 patients) in the angiography group and 7.3% (37 patients) in the FFR group (P=0.04). At 1 year, 77.9% of the patients in the angiography group were free from angina, as compared with 81.3% in the FFR group (P=0.20). A total of 67.6% of patients in the angiography group and 73.0% in the FFR group did not have an event and were free from angina at 1 year (P=0.07).

The mean cost of materials used in the index procedure was $6,007±2,819 in the angiography group, as compared with $5,332±3,261 in the FFR group (P<0.001). The mean length of stay in the hospital was 3.7±3.5 days in the angiography group, as compared with 3.4±3.3 days in the FFR group (P=0.05).

Discussion

This study showed that in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, routine measurement of FFR during PCI, as compared with the standard strategy of PCI guided by angiography, significantly reduced the rate of the primary composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 1 year. The combined rate of death and myocardial infarction was also significantly reduced. Without prolonging the procedure, the FFR-guided strategy reduced the number of stents used, decreased the amount of contrast agent used, and resulted in a similar, if not improved, functional status with no decrease in health-related quality of life. Furthermore, the procedure-related costs were significantly lower with the FFR-guided strategy. These results were achieved in a patient population with complex disease. The event rate in the angiography group was similar to that in groups in other recent studies evaluating the use of drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.30-33 Moreover, in 89.6% of the patients assigned to the FFR-guided strategy, at least one stenotic lesion had an FFR of 0.80 or less, indicating ischemia, and stents were placed in these lesions; 63.0% of all lesions that were measured had an FFR of 0.80 or less. These data reflect that in this study, FFR was used in an unselected population, not just in persons with intermediate lesions, of which only approximately 35% have an FFR that indicates ischemia.7

In our study, routine measurement of FFR consistently reduced the incidence of all types of adverse events by approximately 30%. The absolute risk of major adverse cardiac events was reduced by 5 percentage points, which means that measuring FFR in 20 patients can prevent one adverse event. Routine measurement of FFR probably improved the outcomes by allowing more judicious use of stents and equal relief of ischemia. It has been known for decades that the most important prognostic factor among patients with coronary artery disease is the presence and extent of inducible ischemia.1 It might be speculated that PCI of a stenotic lesion that is inducing ischemia (indicated by an FFR ≤0.80) is beneficial overall because the risk of stent thrombosis or restenosis is outweighed by the significant reduction in the risk of ischemic events with stent placement. On the other hand, PCI of a stenotic lesion that is not inducing ischemia (FFR >0.80) increases the chance of an adverse event because the risk of thrombosis and restenosis associated with the placement of the stent, with the attendant risk of subsequent death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization, exceeds by far the low risk associated with a hemodynamically nonsignificant stenosis in which a stent has not been placed.7 Thus, performing PCI on all stenoses that have been identified by angiography, regardless of their potential to induce ischemia, diminishes the benefit of relieving ischemia by exposing the patient to an increased stent-related risk, whereas systematically measuring FFR can maximize the benefit of PCI by accurately discriminating the lesions for which revascularization will provide the most benefit from those for which PCI may only increase the risk.

Our results also suggest that the outcomes with PCI as compared with those achieved with medical treatment, such as in the COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial (NCT00007657),6 or with coronary-artery bypass grafting, such as in the SYNTAX trial,34 might be improved if the PCI is performed with FFR guidance and might ensure functionally complete revascularization with more appropriate use of stents. A substudy of the COURAGE trial,3 which showed that patients with the greatest relief of ischemia had the lowest rates of death or myocardial infarction, further supports the concept that PCI should be guided by physiological considerations and not solely by anatomical ones.

Earlier studies have suggested that incomplete revascularization results in an outcome that is not optimal.35,36 However, in those studies the decision not to perform PCI for a particular lesion was made on the basis of an angiographic or anatomical assessment. The FFR-guided strategy in this study resulted in functionally complete revascularization but with fewer stents placed.

In this study we tried to reflect routine practice with respect to multivessel PCI. Therefore, patients with angiographically significant left main coronary artery disease were excluded, as were patients presenting with a recent myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation, since multivessel PCI is generally deferred in such patients. Patients in the latter group could be included 5 days or later after the acute event, if at least two angiographically significant lesions were present. Patients who had undergone previous PCI were included in the present study, which is often not the case in randomized trials of coronary revascularization.6,34,37

Other potential limitations of this study include the use of an FFR cutoff value of 0.80 as reflecting inducible ischemia. In previous studies, in a variety of clinical and angiographic conditions, FFR cutoff values between 0.75 and 0.80 have been used.15-18 We decided to take the upper limit of that small transition zone in order to limit the number of ischemic lesions left untreated. Finally, the current data are restricted to a 1-year follow-up period. Theoretically, lesions in the FFR group in which stents were not placed could progress and lead to events after 1 year. However, from previous studies it is known that persons who have lesions with an FFR of more than 0.80, if optimally treated with medication, have an excellent prognosis, with an event rate of approximately 1% per year up to 5 years after measurement.7 We intend to collect follow-up data for a total period of 5 years for the present study.

In conclusion, in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents, routine measurement of FFR in addition to angiographic guidance, as compared with PCI guided by angiography alone, results in a significant reduction in major adverse events at 1 year, a finding that supports the evolving strategy of revascularization of ischemic lesions and medical treatment of nonischemic lesions.

Supported by unrestricted research grants from Radi Medical Systems and Stichting Vrienden van het Hart Zuidoost Brabant. Medtronic provided limited financial support to some centers by tailoring the price of the Endeavor stents to the local reimbursement system.

Dr. Pijls reports receiving an institutional research grant for the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven from Radi Medical Systems; Dr. Engstrøm, lecture fees from Nycomed Denmark; Dr. Oldroyd, consulting fees from Radi Medical Systems, Boston Scientific, and Cordis and lecture fees and grant support from Boston Scientific; Dr. Ver Lee, lecture fees from Radi Medical Systems; and Dr. Fearon, consulting fees from Abbott Vascular. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Source Information

From the Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands (P.A.L.T., N.H.J.P., M.V.); Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Aalst, Belgium (B.D.B.); University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria, and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (U.S.); Stanford University Medical Center and Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care Systems, Stanford, CA (F.I., W.F.F.); Medizinische Poliklinik, Campus-Innenstadt, University Hospital, Munich, Germany (V.K.); the Heart Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom (G.M.); Rigshopitalet, Copenhagen (T.E.); Western Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom (K.G.O.); Northeast Cardiology Associates, Bangor, ME (P.N.V.L.); and King's College Hospital, London (P.A.M.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Pijls at the Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, or at .

The investigators participating in the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study are listed in the Appendix.

Appendix

The members of the FAME study group are as follows: Steering Committee — N. Pijls (principal investigator), W. Fearon (principal investigator), B. De Bruyne, P. Tonino; Writing Committee — N. Pijls, W. Fearon, B. De Bruyne, U. Siebert, P. Tonino; Clinical Events Committee — E. Eeckhout, M. El Gamal, E. Barbato, M. Kern; J. Hodgson; Data Analysis Committee — U. Siebert, R. Gothe, B. Bornschein; Study investigators: United States — Stanford University Medical Center and Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care Systems, Stanford, CA: W. Fearon, F. Ikeno, T. Brinton, D. Lee, S. Williams, A. Yeung; Northeast Cardiology Associates, Bangor, ME: P. Ver Lee, A. Wiseman, G. Crespo, R. Fincke, P. Vom Eigen; Saint Louis University, St. Louis: M. Lim, R. Longnecker; University of Louisville, Louisville, KY: M. Leesar, V. Yalamanchili, S. Ikram; University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville: M. Ragosta, L. Gimple, L. Lipson; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston: E. Powers. United Kingdom — Western Infirmary, Glasgow: K. Oldroyd, M. Lindsay, S. Robb, S. Watkins; Heart Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast: G. Manoharan, P. Tierney; King's College Hospital, London: P. MacCarthy, A. Shah, M. Thomas, J. Hill; Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol: A. Baumbach, P. Wilde, A. Nightingale, A. Skyme-Jones, E. Barnes; Sweden — Södersjukhuset, Stockholm: I. Herzfeld, M. Törnerud, P. Alström, N. Witt; Helsinborgs Lasarett, Helsingborg: F. Schersten; the Netherlands — Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven: J. Bonnier, C. Botman, B. Brueren, J. van Dantzig, J. Koolen, H. Michels, C. Peels, N. Pijls, P. Tonino; Germany — Medizinische Poliklinik, Campus-Innenstadt, University Hospital, Munich: V. Klauss, J. Rieber, T. Schiele, M. Leibig, Y. Sohn, J. Söllner; University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum: W. Bojara, M. Lindstaedt, A. Yazar; Klinikum Bogenhausen, Munich: G. Riess; Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt: G. Werner; Denmark — Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen: T. Engstrøm, H. Kelbaek, E. Jørgensen, S. Helqvist, K. Saunamäki, P. Clemmensen, J. Kastrup; Aalborg Sygehus Syd, Aalborg: K. Rasmussen, O. Frobert; Belgium — Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Aalst: B. De Bruyne, N. Melikian, J. Bartunek, E. Wyffels, G. Heyndrickx, W. Wijns, M. Vanderheyden, H. Batjoens.

References

References

  1. 1

    Beller GA, Zaret BL. Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000;101:1465-1478
    Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE. Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11:171-185
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008;117:1283-1291
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, et al. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. Circulation 1997;95:2037-2043
    Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Erne P, Schoenenberger AW, Burckhardt D, et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;297:1985-1991
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1503-1516
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2105-2111
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Moses JW, Stone GW, Nikolsky E, et al. Drug-eluting stents in the treatment of intermediate lesions: pooled analysis from four randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2164-2171
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Ong AT, van Domburg RT, Aoki J, Sonnenschein K, Lemos PA, Serruys PW. Sirolimus-eluting stents remain superior to bare-metal stents at two years: medium-term results from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1356-1360
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Kaiser C, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, et al. Incremental cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents compared with a third-generation bare-metal stent in a real-world setting: randomised Basel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial (BASKET). Lancet 2005;366:921-929[Erratum, Lancet 2005;366:2086.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, et al. Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2584-2591
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Lima RS, Watson DD, Goode AR, et al. Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:64-70
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, et al. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:210-215
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology: the dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995;92:2333-2342
    Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703-1708
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Bartunek J, et al. Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation 2001;104:157-162
    Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995;92:3183-3193
    Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Pijls NH. Optimum guidance of complex PCI by coronary pressure measurement. Heart 2004;90:1085-1093
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Legalery P, Schiele F, Seronde MF, et al. One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2623-2629
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Berger A, Botman KJ, MacCarthy PA, et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:438-442
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Wongpraparut N, Yalamanchili V, Pasnoori V, et al. Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:877-884
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Fearon WF, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Siebert U, Pijls NH. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study. Am Heart J 2007;154:632-636[Erratum, Am Heart J 2007;154:1243.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1993;87:1354-1367
    Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199-208
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2007;116:2634-2653
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005;1:219-227

  27. 27

    Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Tsuchida K, et al. Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the SYNTAX score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel lumen obstruction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1072-1081
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001;33:337-343
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Kastrati A, Dibra A, Eberle S, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 2005;294:819-825
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al. Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2008;358:331-341
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Stankovic G, Cosgrave J, Chieffo A, et al. Impact of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents on outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus and stenting in more than one coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:362-366
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Tanimoto S, Daemen J, Tsuchida K, et al. Two-year clinical outcome after coronary stenting of small vessels using 2.25-mm sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: insight into the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:94-103
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  33. 33

    Win HK, Caldera AE, Maresh K, et al. Clinical outcomes and stent thrombosis following off-label use of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 2007;297:2001-2009
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    Ong AT, Serruys PW, Mohr FW, et al. The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase. Am Heart J 2006;151:1194-1204
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  35. 35

    Hannan EL, Racz M, Holmes DR, et al. Impact of completeness of percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization on long-term outcomes in the stent era. Circulation 2006;113:2406-2412
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  36. 36

    Teirstein PS. The dueling hazards of incomplete revascularization and incomplete data. Circulation 2006;113:2380-2382
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  37. 37

    Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE, et al. Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1117-1124
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (242)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    2012. References. , 348-358.
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Deborah H. Kwon, Rory Hachamovitch. (2012) Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance. Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Ramón Lopez-Palop, Pilar Carrillo, Francisco Torres, Iñigo Lozano, Araceli Frutos, Pablo Avanzas, Alberto Cordero, Juan Rondán. (2012) Resultados del empleo de la reserva fraccional de flujo en la valoración de lesiones no causales en el síndrome coronario agudo. Revista Española de Cardiología 65:2, 164-170
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Angela S. Koh, Ron Blankstein. (2012) Selecting the Best Noninvasive Imaging Test to Guide Treatment After an Inconclusive Exercise Test. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 14:1, 8-23
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Christian W. Hamm, Jean-Pierre Bassand, Stefan Agewall, Jeroen Bax, Eric Boersma, Hector Bueno, Pio Caso, Dariusz Dudek, Stephan Gielen, Kurt Huber, Magnus Ohman, Mark C. Petrie, Frank Sonntag, Miguel Sousa Uva, Robert F. Storey, William Wijns, Doron Zahger. (2012) Guía de práctica clínica de la ESC para el manejo del síndrome coronario agudo en pacientes sin elevación persistente del segmento ST. Revista Española de Cardiología 65:2, 173.e1-173.e55
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Ramón Lopez-Palop, Pilar Carrillo, Francisco Torres, Iñigo Lozano, Araceli Frutos, Pablo Avanzas, Alberto Cordero, Juan Rondán. (2012) Results of Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement to Evaluate Nonculprit Coronary Artery Stenoses in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) 65:2, 164-170
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Sharmila Dorbala, Venkatesh L. Murthy. (2012) Coronary artery calcification and vascular function. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Joanne Shannon, Antonio Colombo. (2012) Revascularization in multivessel CAD: a functional approach. Nature Reviews Cardiology
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Henry Gewirtz. (2012) PET measurement of adenosine stimulated absolute myocardial blood flow for physiological assessment of the coronary circulation. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Ramesh S. Kutty, Sukumaran K. Nair. (2012) Surgery for coronary artery disease. Surgery (Oxford) 30:1, 32-38
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    L. David Hillis, Peter K. Smith, Jeffrey L. Anderson, John A. Bittl, Charles R. Bridges, John G. Byrne, Joaquin E. Cigarroa, Verdi J. DiSesa, Loren F. Hiratzka, Adolph M. Hutter, Michael E. Jessen, Ellen C. Keeley, Stephen J. Lahey, Richard A. Lange, Martin J. London, Michael J. Mack, Manesh R. Patel, John D. Puskas, Joseph F. Sabik, Ola Selnes, David M. Shahian, Jeffrey C. Trost, Michael D. Winniford, Alice K. Jacobs, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Nancy Albert, Mark A. Creager, Steven M. Ettinger, Robert A. Guyton, Jonathan L. Halperin, Judith S. Hochman, Frederick G. Kushner, E. Magnus Ohman, William Stevenson, Clyde W. Yancy. (2012) 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Executive summary. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 143:1, 4-34
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Siu-Sun Yao, Omar Wever-Pinzon, Xiaoqian Zhang, Sripal Bangalore, Farooq A. Chaudhry. (2012) Prognostic Value of Stress Echocardiogram in Patients With Angiographically Significant Coronary Artery Disease. The American Journal of Cardiology 109:2, 153-158
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Soo-Jin Kang, Jung-Min Ahn, Haegeun Song, Won-Jang Kim, Jong-Young Lee, Duk-Woo Park, Sung-Cheol Yun, Seung-Whan Lee, Young-Hak Kim, Cheol Whan Lee, Seong-Wook Park, Seung-Jung Park. (2012) Usefulness of Minimal Luminal Coronary Area Determined by Intravascular Ultrasound to Predict Functional Significance in Stable and Unstable Angina Pectoris. The American Journal of Cardiology
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    An S De Vriese, Stefaan J Vandecasteele, Barbara Van den Bergh, Frank W De Geeter. (2012) Should we screen for coronary artery disease in asymptomatic chronic dialysis patients?. Kidney International 81:2, 143-151
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    B. S. Ko, J. D. Cameron, I. T. Meredith, M. Leung, P. R. Antonis, A. Nasis, M. Crossett, S. A. Hope, S. J. Lehman, J. Troupis, T. DeFrance, S. K. Seneviratne. (2012) Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. European Heart Journal 33:1, 67-77
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Vikas Aggarwal, Swapnil Rajpathak, Manjeet Singh, Benjamin Romick, Vankeepuram Srinivas. (2012) Clinical outcomes based on completeness of revascularisation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of multivessel coronary artery disease studies. EuroIntervention 7:9, 1095-1102
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Andreas Schuster, Geraint Morton, Amedeo Chiribiri, Divaka Perera, Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde, Eike Nagel. (2012) Imaging in the Management of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 59:4, 359-370
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Achim Seeger, Anja Hennemuth, Bernhard Klumpp, Michael Fenchel, Ulrich Kramer, Christiane Bretschneider, Stefanie Mangold, Andreas E. May, Claus D. Claussen, Heinz-Otto Peitgen, Stephan Miller. (2012) Fusion of MR coronary angiography and viability imaging: Feasibility and clinical value for the assignment of myocardial infarctions. European Journal of Radiology 81:1, 71-76
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    David Adlam, Nicholas Evans, Aneal Malhotra, Disha Midha, Felicity Rowley, David Hutchings, Mirae Shin, Guy Mole, Alexander Stockenhuber, Mark Lumb, Jonathan Wordsworth, Sophie Frantal, J. Colin Forfar. (2012) Repeat percutaneous coronary revascularization: Indications and outcomes in a “Real World” cohort. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventionsn/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Michael Fiechter, Jelena R. Ghadri, Mathias Wolfrum, Silke M. Kuest, Aju P. Pazhenkottil, Rene N. Nkoulou, Bernhard A. Herzog, Cathérine Gebhard, Tobias A. Fuchs, Oliver Gaemperli, Philipp A. Kaufmann. (2011) Downstream resource utilization following hybrid cardiac imaging with an integrated cadmium-zinc-telluride/64-slice CT device. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    D. Thompson, M. J. Koster, R. H. Wagner, A. Heroux, J. T. Barron. (2011) Single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging to detect cardiac allograft vasculopathy. European Journal of Echocardiography
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Morton J. Kern. (2011) An Adenosine-Independent Index of Stenosis Severity From Coronary Wave–Intensity Analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    George Hahalis, George Dangas, Periklis Davlouros, Dimitrios Alexopoulos. (2011) Revascularization strategies for stable multivessel and unprotected left main coronary artery disease: From BARI to SYNTAX. International Journal of Cardiology 153:2, 126-134
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Glenn N. Levine, Eric R. Bates, James C. Blankenship, Steven R. Bailey, John A. Bittl, Bojan Cercek, Charles E. Chambers, Stephen G. Ellis, Robert A. Guyton, Steven M. Hollenberg, Umesh N. Khot, Richard A. Lange, Laura Mauri, Roxana Mehran, Issam D. Moussa, Debabrata Mukherjee, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Henry H. Ting. (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:24, e44-e122
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    , C. W. Hamm, J.-P. Bassand, S. Agewall, J. Bax, E. Boersma, H. Bueno, P. Caso, D. Dudek, S. Gielen, K. Huber, M. Ohman, M. C. Petrie, F. Sonntag, M. S. Uva, R. F. Storey, W. Wijns, D. Zahger, , J. J. Bax, A. Auricchio, H. Baumgartner, C. Ceconi, V. Dean, C. Deaton, R. Fagard, C. Funck-Brentano, D. Hasdai, A. Hoes, J. Knuuti, P. Kolh, T. McDonagh, C. Moulin, D. Poldermans, B. A. Popescu, Z. Reiner, U. Sechtem, P. A. Sirnes, A. Torbicki, A. Vahanian, S. Windecker, , S. Windecker, S. Achenbach, L. Badimon, M. Bertrand, H. E. Botker, J.-P. Collet, F. Crea, N. Danchin, E. Falk, J. Goudevenos, D. Gulba, R. Hambrecht, J. Herrmann, A. Kastrati, K. Kjeldsen, S. D. Kristensen, P. Lancellotti, J. Mehilli, B. Merkely, G. Montalescot, F.-J. Neumann, L. Neyses, J. Perk, M. Roffi, F. Romeo, M. Ruda, E. Swahn, M. Valgimigli, C. J. Vrints, P. Widimsky. (2011) ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal 32:23, 2999-3054
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    L. David Hillis, Peter K. Smith, Jeffrey L. Anderson, John A. Bittl, Charles R. Bridges, John G. Byrne, Joaquin E. Cigarroa, Verdi J. DiSesa, Loren F. Hiratzka, Adolph M. Hutter, Michael E. Jessen, Ellen C. Keeley, Stephen J. Lahey, Richard A. Lange, Martin J. London, Michael J. Mack, Manesh R. Patel, John D. Puskas, Joseph F. Sabik, Ola Selnes, David M. Shahian, Jeffrey C. Trost, Michael D. Winniford. (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:24, e123-e210
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    L. David Hillis, Peter K. Smith, Jeffrey L. Anderson, John A. Bittl, Charles R. Bridges, John G. Byrne, Joaquin E. Cigarroa, Verdi J. DiSesa, Loren F. Hiratzka, Adolph M. Hutter, Michael E. Jessen, Ellen C. Keeley, Stephen J. Lahey, Richard A. Lange, Martin J. London, Michael J. Mack, Manesh R. Patel, John D. Puskas, Joseph F. Sabik, Ola Selnes, David M. Shahian, Jeffrey C. Trost, Michael D. Winniford. (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:24, 2584-2614
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Chang-Wook Nam, William F Fearon. (2011) Role of the functional SYNTAX score in evaluating multivessel coronary artery disease. Interventional Cardiology 3:6, 695-704
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Florim Cuculi, Adrian P. Banning, Alexander Abizaid, Antonio L. Bartorelli, Ana C. Baux, Vladimir Dzavík, Stepehen Ellis, Runlin Gao, David Holmes, Myung H. Jeong, Victor Legrand, Franz-Josef Neumann, Maria Nyakern, Christian Spaulding, Hans-Peter Stoll, Stephen Worthley, Philip Urban. (2011) Outcomes in patients undergoing multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention using sirolimus-eluting stents: a report from the e-SELECT registry. EuroIntervention 7:8, 962-968
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    A. Kapur, A. C. Qureshi, S. Gallagher, M. Finlay, I. S. Malik, J. Mayet, M. Roughton, K. J. Beatt, R. J. Hall, P. Nihoyannopoulos. (2011) Myocardial function may improve equally in diabetic patients following both multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting: results from a CARDia trial substudy. European Journal of Echocardiography 12:12, 904-909
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Glenn N. Levine, Eric R. Bates, James C. Blankenship, Steven R. Bailey, John A. Bittl, Bojan Cercek, Charles E. Chambers, Stephen G. Ellis, Robert A. Guyton, Steven M. Hollenberg, Umesh N. Khot, Richard A. Lange, Laura Mauri, Roxana Mehran, Issam D. Moussa, Debabrata Mukherjee, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Henry H. Ting. (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:24, 2550-2583
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Sayan Sen, Javier Escaned, Iqbal S. Malik, Ghada W. Mikhail, Rodney A. Foale, Rafael Mila, Jason Tarkin, Ricardo Petraco, Christopher Broyd, Richard Jabbour, Amarjit Sethi, Christopher S. Baker, Micheal Bellamy, Mahmud Al-Bustami, David Hackett, Masood Khan, David Lefroy, Kim H. Parker, Alun D. Hughes, Darrel P. Francis, Carlo Di Mario, Jamil Mayet, Justin E. Davies. (2011) Development and Validation of a New Adenosine-Independent Index of Stenosis Severity From Coronary Wave–Intensity Analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Richard T. George, Vishal C. Mehra, Antti Saraste, Juhani Knuuti. (2011) Myocardial Perfusion by CT Versus Hybrid Imaging. Cardiology Clinics
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Y. Huo, M. Svendsen, J. S. Choy, Z.- D. Zhang, G. S. Kassab. (2011) A validated predictive model of coronary fractional flow reserve. Journal of The Royal Society Interface
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    O. Gaemperli, A. Saraste, J. Knuuti. (2011) Cardiac hybrid imaging. European Journal of Echocardiography
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Michael S. Lauer. (2011) Advancing the paradigm for cardiovascular imaging research. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    A. P. Pazhenkottil, R. N. Nkoulou, J.-R. Ghadri, B. A. Herzog, S. M. Kuest, L. Husmann, M. Wolfrum, R. Goetti, R. R. Buechel, O. Gaemperli, T. F. Luscher, P. A. Kaufmann. (2011) Impact of cardiac hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography imaging on choice of treatment strategy in coronary artery disease. European Heart Journal 32:22, 2824-2829
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Stephan Achenbach. (2011) Anatomy Meets Function. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:19, 1998-2000
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Michael Fiechter, Jelena R. Ghadri, Silke M. Kuest, Aju P. Pazhenkottil, Mathias Wolfrum, Rene N. Nkoulou, Robert Goetti, Oliver Gaemperli, Philipp A. Kaufmann. (2011) Nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging with a novel cadmium-zinc-telluride detector SPECT/CT device: first validation versus invasive coronary angiography. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 38:11, 2025-2030
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Bobak Heydari, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Raymond Y. Kwong. (2011) Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 54:3, 191-203
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Robert A. Henderson, Adam D. Timmis. (2011) Almanac 2011: stable coronary artery disease. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia 30:11, 869-878
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Jan-Willem E.M. Sels, Pim A.L. Tonino, Uwe Siebert, William F. Fearon, Marcel Van't Veer, Bernard De Bruyne, Nico H.J. Pijls. (2011) Fractional Flow Reserve in Unstable Angina and Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 4:11, 1183-1189
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Robert A. Henderson, Adam D. Timmis. (2011) Almanac 2011: Stable coronary artery disease. The national society journals present selected research that has driven recent advances in clinical cardiology. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition) 30:11, 869-878
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Jason C. Kovacic, Paul Lee, Usman Baber, Rucha Karajgikar, Solene M. Evrard, Pedro Moreno, Roxana Mehran, Valentin Fuster, George Dangas, Samin K. Sharma, Annapoorna S. Kini. (2011) Inverse relationship between body mass index and coronary artery calcification in patients with clinically significant coronary lesions. Atherosclerosis
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Bon-Kwon Koo, Andrejs Erglis, Joon-Hyung Doh, David V. Daniels, Sanda Jegere, Hyo-Soo Kim, Allison Dunning, Tony DeFrance, Alexandra Lansky, Jonathan Leipsic, James K. Min. (2011) Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:19, 1989-1997
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Olivier Muller, Fabio Mangiacapra, Argyrios Ntalianis, Katia M.C. Verhamme, Catalina Trana, Michalis Hamilos, Jozef Bartunek, Marc Vanderheyden, Eric Wyffels, Guy R. Heyndrickx, Frank J.A. van Rooij, Jacqueline C.M. Witteman, Albert Hofman, William Wijns, Emanuele Barbato, Bernard De Bruyne. (2011) Long-Term Follow-Up After Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Treatment Strategy in Patients With an Isolated Proximal Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Stenosis. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 4:11, 1175-1182
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Hideshi Ishii, Toru Kataoka, Yoshiki Kobayashi, Takara Tsumori, Hiroaki Takeshita, Ryo Matsumoto, Nobuyuki Shirai, Hiroki Nishioka, Takao Hasegawa, Shinji Nakata, Yoshihisa Shimada, Shoichi Ehara, Takashi Muro, Minoru Yoshiyama. (2011) Utility of myocardial fractional flow reserve for prediction of restenosis following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Heart and Vessels 26:6, 572-581
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Soo-Jin Kang, Jong-Young Lee, Jung-Min Ahn, Hae Geun Song, Won-Jang Kim, Duk-Woo Park, Sung-Cheol Yun, Seung-Whan Lee, Young-Hak Kim, Gary S. Mintz, Cheol Whan Lee, Seong-Wook Park, Seung-Jung Park. (2011) Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived Predictors for Fractional Flow Reserve in Intermediate Left Main Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 4:11, 1168-1174
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Brian S. Ko, James D. Cameron, Tony DeFrance, Sujith K. Seneviratne. (2011) CT stress myocardial perfusion imaging using Multidetector CT—A review. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 5:6, 345-356
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Andrea L. Vavere, Gregory G. Simon, Richard T. George, Carlos E. Rochitte, Andrew E. Arai, Julie M. Miller, Marcello Di Carli, Armin A. Zadeh, Marc Dewey, Hiroyuki Niinuma, Roger Laham, Frank J. Rybicki, Joanne D. Schuijf, Narinder Paul, John Hoe, Sachio Kuribyashi, Hajime Sakuma, Cesar Nomura, Tan Swee Yaw, Klaus F. Kofoed, Kunihiro Yoshioka, Melvin E. Clouse, Jeffrey Brinker, Christopher Cox, Joao A.C. Lima. (2011) Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 row detector computed tomography: design and implementation of the CORE320 multicenter, multinational diagnostic study. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 5:6, 370-381
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Marcus Peter Crossett, Mical Schneider-Kolsky, John Troupis. (2011) Normal perfusion of the left ventricular myocardium using 320 MDCT. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 5:6, 406-411
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Minisha Kochar, Reza Arsanjani, Subha V. Raman, Leslee J. Shaw, Daniel S. Berman, James K. Min. (2011) Identifying and Redefining Stenosis by CT Angiography. Cardiology Clinics
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Francesco Prati, Alessandro Di Giorgio, Vito Ramazzotti, Maria Teresa Mallus. 2011. OCT in the Clinical Practice and Data from Clinical Studies. , 209-219.
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Mette Zacho, Sune Damgaard, Nikolaj Thomas Lilleoer, Henning Kelbaek, Daniel Steinbrüchel, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed. (2011) Long-term internal thoracic artery bypass graft patency and geometry assessed by multidetector computed tomography. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Paul Stolzmann, Hatem Alkadhi, Hans Scheffel, André Plass, Sebastian Leschka, Volkmar Falk, Sebastian Kozerke, Christophe Wyss, Olivio F. Donati. (2011) Combining cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography coronary calcium scoring: added value for the assessment of morphological coronary disease?. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 27:7, 969-977
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    J. Layland, A.M. MacIsaac, A.T. Burns, R.J. Whitbourn, A.M. Wilson. (2011) Integrated Coronary Physiology in Percutaneous Intervention: A new paradigm in interventional cardiology. Heart, Lung and Circulation 20:10, 641-646
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    F Mangiacapra, B De Bruyne, W Wijns, J Bartunek. (2011) Optimizing Revascularization Strategies in Coronary Artery Disease for Optimal Benefit to Patients. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 90:4, 630-633
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    J C Kovacic, V Fuster. (2011) From Treating Complex Coronary Artery Disease to Promoting Cardiovascular Health: Therapeutic Transitions and Challenges, 2010–2020. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 90:4, 509-518
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Andre Plass, Maximilian Y. Emmert, Oliver Gaemperli, Hatem Alkadhi, Philipp Kaufmann, Volkmar Falk, Jürg Grünenfelder. (2011) The Potential Value of Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Dual-Source Computed Tomography Imaging in Coronary Bypass Surgery. The Heart Surgery Forum 14:5, E283-E290
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Vasim Farooq, Salvatore Brugaletta, Patrick W. Serruys. (2011) Utilizing Risk Scores in Determining the Optimal Revascularization Strategy for Complex Coronary Artery Disease. Current Cardiology Reports 13:5, 415-423
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Nico H.J. Pijls, Pim A.L. Tonino. (2011) The Crux of Maximum Hyperemia. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 4:10, 1093-1095
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Pradeep K. Nair, Oscar C. Marroquin, Suresh R. Mulukutla, Sameer Khandhar, Vijay Gulati, John T. Schindler, Joon S. Lee. (2011) Clinical Utility of Regadenoson for Assessing Fractional Flow Reserve. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 4:10, 1085-1092
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Masanao Naya, Venkatesh L. Murthy, Ron Blankstein, Arkadiusz Sitek, Jon Hainer, Courtney Foster, Mariya Gaber, Jolene M. Fantony, Sharmila Dorbala, Marcelo F. Di Carli. (2011) Quantitative Relationship Between the Extent and Morphology of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque and Downstream Myocardial Perfusion. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:17, 1807-1816
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    David Moher, Sally Hopewell, Kenneth F. Schulz, Victor Montori, Peter C. Gøtzsche, P.J. Devereaux, Diana Elbourne, Matthias Egger, Douglas G. Altman. (2011) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. International Journal of Surgery
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Neal S. Kleiman. (2011) Bringing It All Together. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:12, 1219-1221
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Chang-Wook Nam, Fabio Mangiacapra, Robert Entjes, In-Sung Chung, Jan-Willem Sels, Pim A.L. Tonino, Bernard De Bruyne, Nico H.J. Pijls, William F. Fearon. (2011) Functional SYNTAX Score for Risk Assessment in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:12, 1211-1218
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Akiko Matsuo, Hiroshi Fujita, Akira Ueoka, Naoki Maruyama, Yoshiaki Shimoda, Eigo Kishita, Yoshinori Tsubakimoto, Tomohiko Sakatani, Keiji Inoue, Makoto Kitamura, Masato Nishimura. (2011) Importance of measuring the fractional flow reserve in patients receiving hemodialysis. Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 26:3, 215-221
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Felix Woitek, Gerhard C. Schuler. (2011) Coronary artery disease and aortic stenosis: small steps to cross the border to full interventional treatment in selected high-risk patients. EuroIntervention 7:5, 533-535
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    James K. Min, Daniel S. Berman, Matthew J. Budoff, Farouc A. Jaffer, Jonathon Leipsic, Martin B. Leon, G.B. John Mancini, Laura Mauri, Robert S. Schwartz, Leslee J. Shaw. (2011) Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 5:5, 301-309
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Alberto Ranieri De Caterina, Italo Porto, Antonio Maria Leone, Filippo Crea. (2011) Angiographic versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: A “proof of concept” case report. International Journal of Cardiology
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    I. A. Scott. (2011) Using computed tomography coronary angiography to evaluate patients with acute chest pain: putting the horse before the cart. Internal Medicine Journal 41:9, 647-650
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Vishal C. Mehra, Marietta Ambrose, Carolina Valdiviezo-Schlomp, Karl H. Schuleri, Albert C. Lardo, Joao A. C. Lima, Richard T. George. (2011) CT-Based Myocardial Perfusion Imaging-Practical Considerations: Acquisition, Image Analysis, Interpretation, and Challenges. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research 4:4, 437-448
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Morton J. Kern. (2011) FFR-Guided Percutaneous Intervention in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Real Game Changer. Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 4:4, 263-265
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Leslee J. Shaw, Rory Hachamovitch, James Min, Daniel S. Berman. (2011) Importance of Residual Myocardial Ischemia After Intervention in the Genesis of Cardiovascular Events Among Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease. Current Cardiology Reports 13:4, 280-286
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Robert A. deKemp, Mikael Trottier, Rob S. B. Beanlands. (2011) Incremental prognostic value of coronary flow reserve assessed with single-photon emission computed tomography. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 18:4, 541-543
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Evelyn Regar. (2011) Invasive imaging technologies. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 12:8, 562-570
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Fabio Mangiacapra, Emanuele Barbato. (2011) From SYNTAX to FAME, a paradigm shift in revascularization strategies. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 12:8, 538-542
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    H. Rittger, A.-M. Sinha, J. Brachmann. (2011) Moderne Techniken der angiographischen Diagnostik im Katheterlabor. Herz 36:5, 396-401
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Pieter J. Vlaar, Karim D. Mahmoud, David R. Holmes, Gert van Valkenhoef, Hans L. Hillege, Iwan C.C. van der Horst, Felix Zijlstra, Bart J.G.L. de Smet. (2011) Culprit Vessel Only Versus Multivessel and Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Multivessel Disease in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:7, 692-703
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    M. Lindstaedt, A. Mügge. (2011) Myocardial fractional flow reserve. Herz 36:5, 410-416
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    Parham Eshtehardi, Jennifer Luke, Michael C. McDaniel, Habib Samady. (2011) Intravascular Imaging Tools in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Comprehensive Assessment of Anatomy and Physiology. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research 4:4, 393-403
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    R. Erbel. (2011) Fortschritte der Diagnostik sind die treibende Kraft für die Weiterentwicklung interventioneller Verfahren. Herz 36:5, 383-385
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Pamela S. Douglas, Manesh R. Patel, Steven R. Bailey, David Dai, Lisa Kaltenbach, Ralph G. Brindis, John Messenger, Eric D. Peterson. (2011) Hospital Variability in the Rate of Finding Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease at Elective, Diagnostic Coronary Angiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:8, 801-809
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Young Bin Song, Sang-Yeub Lee, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Jin-Ho Choi, Sang Hoon Lee, Kyung Pyo Hong, Jeong Euy Park, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon. (2011) Complete versus incomplete revascularization for treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era. Heart and Vessels
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    Tiago Godinho Teixeira, Joana Silva, Paula Mota, A.M. Leitão-Marques. (2011) Importance of different techniques in assessing the significance of coronary stenosis. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition) 30:7-8, 679-682
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Bon-Kwon Koo, Hyoung-Mo Yang, Jun-Hyung Doh, Hyunmin Choe, Sung-Yun Lee, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Yun-Kyeong Cho, Chang-Wook Nam, Seung-Ho Hur, Hong-Seok Lim, Myeong-Ho Yoon, Kyung-Woo Park, Sang-Hoon Na, Tae-Jin Youn, Woo-Young Chung, Seunghyun Ma, Sue-Kyung Park, Hyo-Soo Kim, Seung-Jea Tahk. (2011) Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound Criteria and Their Accuracy for Defining the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses of Different Locations. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 4:7, 803-811
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Tiago Godinho Teixeira, Joana Silva, Paula Mota, A.M. Leitão-Marques. (2011) Importância de diferentes técnicas na avaliação da significância de estenoses coronárias. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia 30:7-8, 679-682
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Arjen van der Horst, Maartje C.F. Geven, Marcel C.M. Rutten, Nico H.J. Pijls, Frans N. van de Vosse. (2011) Thermal anemometric assessment of coronary flow reserve with a pressure-sensing guide wire: An in vitro evaluation. Medical Engineering & Physics 33:6, 684-691
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    Jamie Layland, Andrew T. Burns, Jithendra Somaratne, Robert J. Whitbourn. (2011) Looks can be deceiving: dissociation between angiographic severity and hemodynamic significance of a lesion. The importance of microvascular resistance. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 12:4, 258-261
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Tomofumi Misaka, Hiroyuki Kunii, Hiroyuki Mizukami, Nobuo Sakamoto, Kazuhiko Nakazato, Yasuchika Takeishi. (2011) Long-term clinical outcomes after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention of intermediate coronary stenoses based on coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Journal of Cardiology 58:1, 32-37
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Gilles Rioufol, Gérard Finet. (2011) Functional Versus Anatomical Stenosis Evaluation. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 4:7, 812-813
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Elisabeth Beran, Magdalena Kapitan, Heinrich Mächler, Luay Salaymeh, Michael Anelli-Monti, Peter Oberwalder, Andrea Berghold, Karlheinz Tscheliessnigg. (2011) Accurate preoperative echocardiography has more impact on prediction of long-term mortality than intra-operatively measured flow in coronary bypass grafts. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 40:1, 245-248
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    N. Smith, A. de Vecchi, M. McCormick, D. Nordsletten, O. Camara, A. F. Frangi, H. Delingette, M. Sermesant, J. Relan, N. Ayache, M. W. Krueger, W. H. W. Schulze, R. Hose, I. Valverde, P. Beerbaum, C. Staicu, M. Siebes, J. Spaan, P. Hunter, J. Weese, H. Lehmann, D. Chapelle, R. Rezavi. (2011) euHeart: personalized and integrated cardiac care using patient-specific cardiovascular modelling. Interface Focus 1:3, 349-364
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    A. P. Pazhenkottil, R. N. Nkoulou, J.-R. Ghadri, B. A. Herzog, R. R. Buechel, S. M. Kuest, M. Wolfrum, M. Fiechter, L. Husmann, O. Gaemperli, P. A. Kaufmann. (2011) Prognostic value of cardiac hybrid imaging integrating single-photon emission computed tomography with coronary computed tomography angiography. European Heart Journal 32:12, 1465-1471
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    Chang-Wook Nam, Seung-Woon Rha, Bon-Kwon Koo, Joon-Hyung Doh, Woo-Young Chung, Myeong-Ho Yoon, Seung-Jea Tahk, Bong-Ki Lee, Jin-Bae Lee, Ki-Dong Yoo, Yun-Kyeong Cho, In-Sung Chung, Seung-Ho Hur, Kwon-Bae Kim, Cheol Ung Choi, Dong Joo Oh. (2011) Usefulness of Coronary Pressure Measurement for Functional Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis. The American Journal of Cardiology 107:12, 1783-1786
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    Myriam Moret, Philippe Moulin. (2011) Dépistage de l’ischémie myocardique silencieuse des patients diabétiques : modalités et enjeux. La Presse Médicale 40:6, 625-633
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    João L. Cavalcante, Balajii Tamarappoo, Rory Hachamovitch. (2011) Assessing Risk and Predicting Outcomes in Coronary Artery Disease: Physiology, Anatomy, or Biology?. Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 4:3, 180-189
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    Soo-Jin Kang, Gary S. Mintz, Won-Jang Kim, Jong-Young Lee, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Whan Lee, Young-Hak Kim, Cheol Whan Lee, Seong-Wook Park, Seung-Jung Park. (2011) Preintervention Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Predictors for Side Branch Compromise After a Single-Stent Crossover Technique. The American Journal of Cardiology 107:12, 1787-1793
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Jung-Min Ahn, Soo-Jin Kang, Gary S. Mintz, Jun-Hyok Oh, Won-Jang Kim, Jong-Young Lee, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Whan Lee, Young-Hak Kim, Cheol Whan Lee, Seong-Wook Park, Dae Hyuk Moon, Seung-Jung Park. (2011) Validation of Minimal Luminal Area Measured by Intravascular Ultrasound for Assessment of Functionally Significant Coronary Stenosis. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 4:6, 665-671
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    Gerald S Werner. (2011) Outcomes following successful recanalization of chronic total coronary occlusions. Interventional Cardiology 3:3, 391-405
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Itsik Ben-Dor, Rebecca Torguson, Michael A. Gaglia, Manuel A. Gonzalez, Gabriel Maluenda, Anh B. Bui, Zhenyi Xue, Lowell F. Satler, William O. Suddath, Joseph Lindsay, Augusto D. Pichard, Ron Waksman. (2011) Correlation between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound lumen area in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. EuroIntervention 7:2, 225-233
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    E. Puymirat, B. De Bruyne. (2011) Sténoses intermédiaires sur plusieurs vaisseaux : intérêt de la mesure de la réserve coronaire pour déterminer la stratégie de revascularisation. Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie 60:3, 148-153
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    Flavio Ribichini, David Taggart. (2011) Implications of new ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularisation for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 39:5, 619-622
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    Rinku Rayoo, Zoe Tuer, Naveen Sharma, Peter Barlis. (2011) Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography for the Assessment of In-Stent Restenosis. Heart, Lung and Circulation 20:5, 332-335
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    Dewi Eurfyl Thomas, Zaheer R. Yousef, Tim D. Kinnaird, Richard A. Anderson. (2011) The value of using fractional flow reserve measurements in helping to diagnose acute left ventricular failure in the presence of normal left ventricular systolic function. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 12:3, 181-183
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    R. Kolozsvári, B. Tar, P. Lugosi, J. Sánta, Z. Béres, T. Ungvári, P. Polgár, Zs. Kőszegi. (2011) Plaque volume derived from three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography predicts the fractional flow reserve. International Journal of Cardiology
    CrossRef

  107. 107

    Morton J. Kern. (2011) Coronary Physiology in the Cath Lab: Beyond the Basics. Cardiology Clinics 29:2, 237-267
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    Abhiram Prasad, Bernard J. Gersh. 2011. Stable Angina. , 213-231.
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    Narbeh Melikian, Martyn R. Thomas. 2011. Physiologic Assessment in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. , 74-89.
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    Patrick Meimoun, Smain Sayah, Anne Luycx-Bore, Jacques Boulanger, Frederic Elmkies, Tahar Benali, Hamdane Zemir, Luc Doutrelan, Jerome Clerc. (2011) Comparison Between Non-Invasive Coronary Flow Reserve and Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Significance of Left Anterior Descending Artery Stenosis of Intermediate Severity. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 24:4, 374-381
    CrossRef

  111. 111

    Clara Carpeggiani, Patrizia Landi, Claudio Michelassi, Elena Barberini, Antonio L'Abbate. (2011) Long-term prognosis in stable angina; medical treatment or coronary revascularization in patients younger than 70years?. International Journal of Cardiology 148:1, 43-47
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    Stefano Sdringola, Nils P. Johnson, Richard L. Kirkeeide, Emma Cid, K. Lance Gould. (2011) Impact of Unexpected Factors on Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion and Coronary Flow Reserve in Young, Asymptomatic Volunteers. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 4:4, 402-412
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    Kuk Hui Son, Ho Sung Son, Kyung Sun. (2011) Are Noninvasive Tests Enough to Decide Upon a Hybrid Coronary Artery Revascularization Strategy?. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 91:4, 1306
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    Jonathan R. Lindner. (2011) The Physiologic Evaluation of Stenosis by Transthoracic Doppler: A Bit of Theory, a Lot of Practice. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 24:4, 382-384
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    Philippe Kolh, William Wijns. (2011) Joint ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 12:4, 264-267
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    Edward L. Korn, Boris Freidlin. (2011) Inefficacy Interim Monitoring Procedures in Randomized Clinical Trials: The Need to Report. The American Journal of Bioethics 11:3, 2-10
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    Henry Gewirtz. (2011) Cardiac PET: A Versatile, Quantitative Measurement Tool for Heart Failure Management. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 4:3, 292-302
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    Dieter Horstkotte, Marcus Wiemer, Frank Buuren. (2011) Performance figures of invasive cardiology in Germany 2006 and 2007 focussing on coronary artery disease. Clinical Research in Cardiology 100:3, 187-190
    CrossRef

  119. 119

    Doralisa Morrone, William S. Weintraub. (2011) Interventional cardiology: Cost-effectiveness of PCI guided by fractional flow reserve. Nature Reviews Cardiology 8:3, 125-126
    CrossRef

  120. 120

    Bhaskar Chandra Konala, Ashish Das, Rupak K. Banerjee. (2011) Influence of arterial wall-stenosis compliance on the coronary diagnostic parameters. Journal of Biomechanics 44:5, 842-847
    CrossRef

  121. 121

    Anthony A. Bavry. (2011) Paving the Coronaries With Stents: Okay in Acute Coronary Syndromes?. Clinical Cardiology 34:3, 141-142
    CrossRef

  122. 122

    Stephen P. Hoole, Michael D. Seddon, Rohan S. Poulter, G.B. John Mancini, David A. Wood, Jacqueline Saw. (2011) Fame Comes at a Cost: A Canadian Analysis of Procedural Costs in Use of Pressure Wire to Guide Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 27:2, 262.e1-262.e2
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    Emmanouil I. Skalidis, Michalis I. Hamilos, Gregory Chlouverakis, Evangelos A. Zacharis, Panos E. Vardas. (2011) Ivabradine improves coronary flow reserve in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 215:1, 160-165
    CrossRef

  124. 124

    Salvatore Brugaletta, Hector M. Garcia-Garcia, Zhu Jun Shen, Josep Gomez-Lara, Roberto Diletti, Giovanna Sarno, Nieves Gonzalo, William Wijns, Bernard Bruyne, Fernando Alfonso, Patrick W. Serruys. (2011) Morphology of coronary artery lesions assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound tissue characterization and fractional flow reserve. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
    CrossRef

  125. 125

    A. S. C. Yong, A. C. C. Ng, D. Brieger, H. C. Lowe, M. K. C. Ng, L. Kritharides. (2011) Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. European Heart Journal 32:3, 345-353
    CrossRef

  126. 126

    C. Seiler. (2011) Aiming at a disorder's concept by 3D QCA vs. FFR: a case of advanced ballistics. European Heart Journal 32:3, 261-263
    CrossRef

  127. 127

    Sharon W. Kirschbaum, Tirza Springeling, Alexia Rossi, Eric Duckers, Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico, Eveline Regar, Pim J. de Feyter, Robert-Jan M. van Geuns. (2011) Comparison of adenosine magnetic resonance perfusion imaging with invasive coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. International Journal of Cardiology 147:1, 184-186
    CrossRef

  128. 128

    Patricia K. Nguyen, Divya Nag, Joseph C. Wu. (2011) Sex differences in the diagnostic evaluation of coronary artery disease. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 18:1, 144-152
    CrossRef

  129. 129

    Ankur Sethi, Amol Bahekar, Rohit Bhuriya, Sarabjeet Singh, Aziz Ahmed, Sandeep Khosla. (2011) Complete versus culprit only revascularization in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 77:2, 163-170
    CrossRef

  130. 130

    Michael McDaniel, Habib Samady. (2011) Use of Coronary Physiology in the Catheterization Laboratory to Guide Treatment in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine 13:1, 35-45
    CrossRef

  131. 131

    Gregory T. Stefano, Hiram G. Bezerra, Guilherme Attizzani, Daniel Chamié, Emile Mehanna, Hirosada Yamamoto, Marco A. Costa. (2011) Utilization of frequency domain optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve to assess intermediate coronary artery stenoses: conciliating anatomic and physiologic information. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 27:2, 299-308
    CrossRef

  132. 132

    Glenn N. Levine, Eric R. Bates, James C. Blankenship, Steven R. Bailey, John A. Bittl, Bojan Cercek, Charles E. Chambers, Stephen G. Ellis, Robert A. Guyton, Steven M. Hollenberg, Umesh N. Khot, Richard A. Lange, Laura Mauri, Roxana Mehran, Issam D. Moussa, Debabrata Mukherjee, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Henry H. Ting, Alice K. Jacobs, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Nancy Albert, Mark A. Creager, Steven M. Ettinger, Robert A. Guyton, Jonathan L. Halperin, Judith S. Hochman, Frederick G. Kushner, E. Magnus Ohman, William Stevenson, Clyde W. Yancy. (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventionsn/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  133. 133

    Takashi Akasaka. (2011) What Can We Expect in PCI in Patients With Chronic Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation Journal 75:1, 211-217
    CrossRef

  134. 134

    Satoshi Kurisu, Naoya Mitsuba, Ken Ishibashi, Yasuko Kato, Yoshihiro Dohi, Kenji Nishioka, Yasuki Kihara. (2011) A Pitfall of Fractional Flow Reserve Associated with the Presence of Collateral Circulation. Internal Medicine 50:22, 2811-2813
    CrossRef

  135. 135

    H. GELDERBLOM, A. VAN DER HORST, J. R. HAARTSEN, M. C. M. RUTTEN, A. A. F. VAN DE VEN, F. N. VAN DE VOSSE. (2011) Analytical and experimental characterization of a miniature calorimetric sensor in a pulsatile flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 666, 428-444
    CrossRef

  136. 136

    Donald E. Cutlip, Roxana Mehran, Pascal Vranckx. (2011) FAME and Coronary Stent Investigations. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 57:1, 115-116
    CrossRef

  137. 137

    James C. Blankenship, Issam D. Moussa, Charles C. Chambers, Emmanouil S. Brilakis, Thomas A. Haldis, Douglas A. Morrison, Gregory J. Dehmer. (2011) Staging of multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions: An expert consensus statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventionsn/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  138. 138

    June-Hong Kim, Ju-Hyun Park, Kiseok Choo, Sung-Kook Song, Jung-Su Kim, Young-Hyun Park, Jun Kim, Kook-Jin Chun, Dongcheul Han, Anthony Z. Faranesh, Robert J Lederman. (2011) Pressure-wire based assessment of microvascular resistance using calibrated upstream balloon obstruction. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventionsn/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  139. 139

    Nico H.J. Pijls, Pim A.L. Tonino. (2011) Reply. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 57:1, 116
    CrossRef

  140. 140

    Seung-Jung Park, Duk-Woo Park. (2011) Left Main Stenting. Circulation Journal 75:4, 749-755
    CrossRef

  141. 141

    M.-F. Seronde, F. Schiele. (2011) Les événements coronariens aigus après angioplastie coronaire : quels sont les bénéfices de l’angioplastie dans l’angor stable ?. Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux - Pratique 2011:194, 27-30
    CrossRef

  142. 142

    Bon-Kwon Koo, Bernard De Bruyne. (2010) FFR in bifurcation stenting: what have we learned?. EuroIntervention 6:J, J94-J98
    CrossRef

  143. 143

    Argyrios Ntalianis, Jan-Willem Sels, Giedrius Davidavicius, Nobuhiro Tanaka, Olivier Muller, Catalina Trana, Emanuele Barbato, Michalis Hamilos, Fabio Mangiacapra, Guy R. Heyndrickx, William Wijns, Nico H.J. Pijls, Bernard De Bruyne. (2010) Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Nonculprit Coronary Artery Stenoses in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:12, 1274-1281
    CrossRef

  144. 144

    Udo Sechtem, Peter Ong, Anastasios Athanasiadis, Matthias Vöhringer, Rimma Merher, Ali Yilmaz. (2010) Coronary Vasospasm: Is it a Myth?. American Journal Cardiovascular Drugs 10, 19-26
    CrossRef

  145. 145

    Faisal Sharif, Catalina Trana, Olivier Muller, Bernard De Bruyne. (2010) Practical tips and tricks for the measurement of fractional flow reserve. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 76:7, 978-985
    CrossRef

  146. 146

    Arthur Nasis, Sujith Seneviratne, Tony DeFrance. (2010) Advances in Contrast-Enhanced Cardiovascular CT for the Evaluation of Myocardial Perfusion. Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 3:6, 372-381
    CrossRef

  147. 147

    STEPHEN P. HOOLE, PATRICK M. HECK, ANDREW C. EPSTEIN, SARAH C. CLARKE, NICK E. J. WEST, DAVID P. DUTKA. (2010) Elective Coronary Stenting Increases Fractional Flow Reserve in Other Arteries due to an Increase in Microvascular Resistance: Clinical Implications for Assessment of Multivessel Disease. Journal of Interventional Cardiology 23:6, 520-527
    CrossRef

  148. 148

    Giovanna Sarno, Scot Garg, Yoshinobu Onuma, Chrysafios Girasis, Pim Tonino, Marie-Angele Morel, Gerrit-Anne van Es, Nico Pijls, Patrick W. Serruys. (2010) Bifurcation lesions: Functional assessment by fractional flow reserve vs. anatomical assessment using conventional and dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiogram. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 76:6, 817-823
    CrossRef

  149. 149

    Giuseppe Tarantini, Davide Lanzellotti. (2010) Three-vessel coronary disease in diabetics: personalized versus evidence-based revascularization strategy. Future Cardiology 6:6, 797-809
    CrossRef

  150. 150

    Elizabeth M. Holper, Tayo Addo. (2010) Clinical implications of the BARI 2D and COURAGE trials: the evolving role of percutaneous coronary intervention. Coronary Artery Disease 21:7, 397-401
    CrossRef

  151. 151

    Giovanna Sarno, Scot Garg, Yoshinobu Onuma, Juan-Luis Gutiérrez-Chico, Marcel J.B.M. van den Brand, Benno J.W.M. Rensing, Marie-angele Morel, Patrick W. Serruys. (2010) Impact of Completeness of Revascularization on the Five-Year Outcome in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients (from the ARTS-II Study). The American Journal of Cardiology 106:10, 1369-1375
    CrossRef

  152. 152

    , , W. Wijns, P. Kolh, N. Danchin, C. Di Mario, V. Falk, T. Folliguet, S. Garg, K. Huber, S. James, J. Knuuti, J. Lopez-Sendon, J. Marco, L. Menicanti, M. Ostojic, M. F. Piepoli, C. Pirlet, J. L. Pomar, N. Reifart, F. L. Ribichini, M. J. Schalij, P. Sergeant, P. W. Serruys, S. Silber, M. Sousa Uva, D. Taggart, , A. Vahanian, A. Auricchio, J. Bax, C. Ceconi, V. Dean, G. Filippatos, C. Funck-Brentano, R. Hobbs, P. Kearney, T. McDonagh, B. A. Popescu, Z. Reiner, U. Sechtem, P. A. Sirnes, M. Tendera, P. E. Vardas, P. Widimsky, , P. Kolh, O. Alfieri, J. Dunning, S. Elia, P. Kappetein, U. Lockowandt, G. Sarris, P. Vouhe, , P. Kearney, L. von Segesser, S. Agewall, A. Aladashvili, D. Alexopoulos, M. J. Antunes, E. Atalar, A. Brutel de la Riviere, A. Doganov, J. Eha, J. Fajadet, R. Ferreira, J. Garot, J. Halcox, Y. Hasin, S. Janssens, K. Kervinen, G. Laufer, V. Legrand, S. A. M. Nashef, F.-J. Neumann, K. Niemela, P. Nihoyannopoulos, M. Noc, J. J. Piek, J. Pirk, Y. Rozenman, M. Sabate, R. Starc, M. Thielmann, D. J. Wheatley, S. Windecker, M. Zembala. (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal 31:20, 2501-2555
    CrossRef

  153. 153

    ALI M. ESEN, GOKSEL ACAR, OZLEM ESEN, YUNUS EMIROGLU, MUSTAFA AKCAKOYUN, SELCUK PALA, HEKIM KARAPINAR, RAMAZAN KARGIN, IRFAN BARUTCU, MUHSIN TURKMEN. (2010) The Prognostic Value of Combined Fractional Flow Reserve and TIMI Frame Count Measurements in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris and Acute Coronary Syndrome. Journal of Interventional Cardiology 23:5, 421-428
    CrossRef

  154. 154

    Gabriel Maluenda, Itsik Ben-Dor, Kohei Wakabayashi, Lowell F Satler, Ron Waksman, Augusto D Pichard. (2010) Intravascular ultrasound guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention in the current practice era. Interventional Cardiology 2:5, 719-733
    CrossRef

  155. 155

    Branko Beleslin, Milan Dobric, Dragana Sobic-Saranovic, Vojislav Giga, Jelena Stepanovic, Ana Djordjevic-Dikic, Milan Nedeljkovic, Sinisa Stojkovic, Vladan Vukcevic, Goran Stankovic, Dejan Orlic, Zorica Petrasinovic, Smiljana Pavlovic, Vladimir Obradovic, Miodrag Ostojic. (2010) Fractional flow reserve and myocardial viability as assessed by SPECT perfusion scintigraphy in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 17:5, 817-824
    CrossRef

  156. 156

    Marcelo F. Di Carli. 2010. PET and CT Imaging. , 321-333.
    CrossRef

  157. 157

    Edward M. Hsiao, Bilal Ali, Sharmila Dorbala. (2010) Clinical Role of Hybrid Imaging. Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 3:5, 324-335
    CrossRef

  158. 158

    Thomas Skaarup Kristensen, Thomas Engstrøm, Henning Kelbæk, Peter von der Recke, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed. (2010) Correlation between coronary computed tomographic angiography and fractional flow reserve. International Journal of Cardiology 144:2, 200-205
    CrossRef

  159. 159

    G. Morton, A. Schuster, D. Perera, E. Nagel. (2010) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to guide complex revascularization in stable coronary artery disease. European Heart Journal 31:18, 2209-2215
    CrossRef

  160. 160

    Deepak Thomas, Robert P. Giugliano. (2010) Perspectives on the 2009 Focused Updates on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Percutaneous Intervention. Critical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 9:3, 126-133
    CrossRef

  161. 161

    Volker Schächinger, Christian Herdeg, Bruno Scheller. (2010) Best way to revascularize patients with main stem and three vessel lesions: patients should undergo PCI!. Clinical Research in Cardiology 99:9, 531-539
    CrossRef

  162. 162

    K. Lance Gould, Nils P. Johnson. (2010) Coronary artery disease: Percent stenosis in CAD—a flaw in current practice. Nature Reviews Cardiology 7:9, 482-484
    CrossRef

  163. 163

    D Moher. (2010) CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine701-741
    CrossRef

  164. 164

    David Moher, Sally Hopewell, Kenneth F. Schulz, Victor Montori, Peter C. Gøtzsche, P.J. Devereaux, Diana Elbourne, Matthias Egger, Douglas G. Altman. (2010) CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63:8, e1-e37
    CrossRef

  165. 165

    Byoung Kwon Lee, Hyun Hee Choi, Kyung-Soon Hong, Byoung-Keuk Kim, Jaemin Shim, Jung-Sun Kim, Young-Guk Ko, Donghoon Choi, Yangsoo Jang, Myeong-Ki Hong. (2010) Efficacy of Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements at Side Branch Vessels Treated With the Crush Stenting Technique in True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. Clinical Cardiology 33:8, 490-494
    CrossRef

  166. 166

    Chang-Wook Nam, Hyuck-Jun Yoon, Yun-Kyeong Cho, Hyoung-Seob Park, Hyungseop Kim, Seung-Ho Hur, Yoon-Nyun Kim, In-Sung Chung, Bon-Kwon Koo, Seung-Jae Tahk, William F. Fearon, Kwon-Bae Kim. (2010) Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Intermediate Coronary Artery Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:8, 812-817
    CrossRef

  167. 167

    David V. Daniels, William F. Fearon. (2010) Fractional Flow Reserve: A Practical Update. Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 3:4, 215-221
    CrossRef

  168. 168

    Billal Patel, Michael Fisher. (2010) Therapeutic advances in myocardial microvascular resistance: Unravelling the enigma. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 127:2, 131-147
    CrossRef

  169. 169

    FEI YE, JUN-JIE ZHANG, NAI-LIANG TIAN, SONG LIN, ZHI-ZHONG LIU, JING KAN, HAI-MEI XU, ZHONGSHENG ZHU, SHAO-LIANG CHEN. (2010) The Acute Changes of Fractional Flow Reserve in DK (Double Kissing), Crush, and 1-Stent Technique for True Bifurcation Lesions. Journal of Interventional Cardiology 23:4, 341-345
    CrossRef

  170. 170

    Argyrios Ntalianis, Catalina Trana, Olivier Muller, Fabio Mangiacapra, Aaron Peace, Carina De Backer, Liesbeth De Block, Eric Wyffels, Jozef Bartunek, Marc Vanderheyden, Alex Heyse, Frederic Van Durme, Luc Van Driessche, Jo De Jans, Guy R. Heyndrickx, William Wijns, Emanuele Barbato, Bernard De Bruyne. (2010) Effective Radiation Dose, Time, and Contrast Medium to Measure Fractional Flow Reserve. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:8, 821-827
    CrossRef

  171. 171

    Richard T. George, Frank M. Bengel, Albert C. Lardo. (2010) Coronary flow reserve by CT perfusion. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 17:4, 540-543
    CrossRef

  172. 172

    Maria Cecilia Ziadi, Rob S. B. Beanlands. (2010) The clinical utility of assessing myocardial blood flow using positron emission tomography. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 17:4, 571-581
    CrossRef

  173. 173

    Serruys, Patrick W., Silber, Sigmund, Garg, Scot, van Geuns, Robert Jan, Richardt, Gert, Buszman, Pawel E., Kelbæk, Henning, van Boven, Adrianus Johannes, Hofma, Sjoerd H., Linke, Axel, Klauss, Volker, Wijns, William, Macaya, Carlos, Garot, Philippe, DiMario, Carlo, Manoharan, Ganesh, Kornowski, Ran, Ischinger, Thomas, Bartorelli, Antonio, Ronden, Jacintha, Bressers, Marco, Gobbens, Pierre, Negoita, Manuela, van Leeuwen, Frank, Windecker, Stephan, . (2010) Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents. New England Journal of Medicine 363:2, 136-146
    Full Text

  174. 174

    Nico H.J. Pijls, William F. Fearon, Pim A.L. Tonino, Uwe Siebert, Fumiaki Ikeno, Bernhard Bornschein, Marcel van't Veer, Volker Klauss, Ganesh Manoharan, Thomas Engstrøm, Keith G. Oldroyd, Peter N. Ver Lee, Philip A. MacCarthy, Bernard De Bruyne. (2010) Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 56:3, 177-184
    CrossRef

  175. 175

    Samuel Wann, Javed Tunio. (2010) Current challenges and future directions in cardiac imaging. Journal of the Saudi Heart Association 22:3, 121-124
    CrossRef

  176. 176

    Pim A.L. Tonino, William F. Fearon, Bernard De Bruyne, Keith G. Oldroyd, Massoud A. Leesar, Peter N. Ver Lee, Philip A. MacCarthy, Marcel van't Veer, Nico H.J. Pijls. (2010) Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 55:25, 2816-2821
    CrossRef

  177. 177

    Ramón López-Palop, Pilar Carrillo, Araceli Frutos, Jesús Castillo, Alberto Cordero, Marlon Toro, Vicente Bertomeu-Martínez. (2010) Utilidad de la reserva fraccional de flujo obtenida mediante guía intracoronaria de presión en la valoración de lesiones angiográficamente moderadas en el síndrome coronario agudo. Revista Española de Cardiología 63:6, 686-694
    CrossRef

  178. 178

    Olivier Muller, Emanuele Barbato, Bernard De Bruyne, Jozef Bartunek. (2010) Biomarkers of vulnerable plaque: the missing link with ischemia. Biomarkers in Medicine 4:3, 375-383
    CrossRef

  179. 179

    Robert J. Applegate. (2010) Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Stent Therapy for Multivessel Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 55:25, 2822-2824
    CrossRef

  180. 180

    Simon R. Dixon, Cindy L. Grines, William W. O'Neill. (2010) The Year in Interventional Cardiology. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 55:20, 2272-2286
    CrossRef

  181. 181

    U. Sechtem, A. Geissler, A. Athanasiadis, P. Ong, H. Mahrholdt. (2010) Diagnostik der koronaren Herzerkrankung mit Computer- und Magnetresonanztomographie. Der Internist 51:5, 625-640
    CrossRef

  182. 182

    Mike Seddon, Nick Curzen. (2010) CORONARY REVASCULARISATION IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE PART 1: STABLE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE. Journal of Renal Care 36, 106-117
    CrossRef

  183. 183

    Samuel Wann. (2010) Characterization of coronary arterial plaque. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 26:4, 385-386
    CrossRef

  184. 184

    Matthias G. Friedrich. (2010) Testing for Myocardial Ischemia. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 3:4, 385-387
    CrossRef

  185. 185

    Takahiro Uchida, Jeffrey Popma, Gregg W. Stone, Stephen G. Ellis, Mark A. Turco, John A. Ormiston, Toshiya Muramatsu, Masato Nakamura, Shinsuke Nanto, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Donald S. Baim. (2010) The Clinical Impact of Routine Angiographic Follow-Up in Randomized Trials of Drug-Eluting Stents. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:4, 403-411
    CrossRef

  186. 186

    P. Jau, T. Jacob, G. Lecorff, J.-L. Bouvier, P. Novella, V. Bechet, V. Pelet. (2010) Place de la scintigraphie myocardique dans l’angor stable. Médecine Nucléaire 34:3, 178-183
    CrossRef

  187. 187

    Konstantinos Toutouzas, Andreas Synetos, Antonis Karanasos, Maria Drakopoulou, Eleutherios Tsiamis, Stamatios Lerakis, Christodoulos Stefanadis. (2010) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Stable Angina. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences1
    CrossRef

  188. 188

    Markus Schwaiger, Sibylle I. Ziegler, Stephan G. Nekolla. (2010) PET/CT challenge for the non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease. European Journal of Radiology 73:3, 494-503
    CrossRef

  189. 189

    Matthias G. Friedrich. (2010) Current status of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of coronary vasculature. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 26, 51A-55A
    CrossRef

  190. 190

    George A. Beller, Michael Ragosta. (2010) Decision Making in Multivessel Coronary Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:3, 315-317
    CrossRef

  191. 191

    James K. Min, Leslee J. Shaw, Daniel S. Berman. (2010) The Present State of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 55:10, 957-965
    CrossRef

  192. 192

    B. Sobkowicz, A. Tomaszuk-Kazberuk, P. Kralisz, J. Malyszko, M. Kalinowski, T. Hryszko, R. Sawicki, S. Dobrzycki, W. J. Musial. (2010) Coronary blood flow in patients with end-stage renal disease assessed by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count method. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 25:3, 926-930
    CrossRef

  193. 193

    M. L. Simoons, S. Windecker. (2010) Chronic stable coronary artery disease: drugs vs. revascularization. European Heart Journal 31:5, 530-541
    CrossRef

  194. 194

    Narbeh Melikian, Pieter De Bondt, Pim Tonino, Olivier De Winter, Eric Wyffels, Jozef Bartunek, Guy R. Heyndrickx, William F. Fearon, Nico H.J. Pijls, William Wijns, Bernard De Bruyne. (2010) Fractional Flow Reserve and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Angiographic Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:3, 307-314
    CrossRef

  195. 195

    (2010) Revascularization for Renal-Artery Stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine 362:8, 762-764
    Full Text

  196. 196

    Michael Lindstaedt, Yasemin Halilcavusogullari, Aydan Yazar, Tim Holland-Letz, Waldemar Bojara, Andreas Mügge, Alfried Germing. (2010) Clinical Outcome Following Conservative vs Revascularization Therapy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Borderline Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements. Clinical Cardiology 33:2, 77-83
    CrossRef

  197. 197

    Stefan Förster, Johannes Rieber, Christopher Übleis, Mayo Weiss, Peter Bartenstein, Paul Cumming, Volker Klauss, Marcus Hacker. (2010) Tc-99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 26:2, 203-213
    CrossRef

  198. 198

    Abdul Hakeem, Mehmet Cilingiroglu, Massoud A. Leesar. (2010) Hemodynamic and intravascular ultrasound assessment of myocardial bridging: Fractional flow reserve paradox with dobutamine versus adenosine. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 75:2, 229-236
    CrossRef

  199. 199

    Jon C. George, George D. Dangas. (2010) 2009 Focused Updates to Guidelines in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:2, 256-258
    CrossRef

  200. 200

    Shinichi Shirai, Takeshi Kimura, Masakiyo Nobuyoshi, Takeshi Morimoto, Kenji Ando, Yoshimitsu Soga, Kyohei Yamaji, Katsuhiro Kondo, Koyu Sakai, Takeshi Arita, Masahiko Goya, Masashi Iwabuchi, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Hideyuki Nosaka, Kazuaki Mitsudo. (2010) Impact of Multiple and Long Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation on 3-Year Clinical Outcomes in the j-Cypher Registry. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:2, 180-188
    CrossRef

  201. 201

    William F. Fearon. (2010) Impact of Drug-Eluting Stent Length on Outcomes. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:2, 189-190
    CrossRef

  202. 202

    Michael Rees. (2010) The relationship between Myocardial SPECT and Fractional Flow Reserve: Is it drifting apart?. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 26:2, 215-216
    CrossRef

  203. 203

    Oliver Gaemperli, Philipp A. Kaufmann. (2010) Multimodality cardiac imaging. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 17:1, 4-7
    CrossRef

  204. 204

    Faisal Sharif, Ross T. Murphy. (2010) Current status of vulnerable plaque detection. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 75:1, 135-144
    CrossRef

  205. 205

    Gerd Heusch. (2010) Adenosine and maximum coronary vasodilation in humans: myth and misconceptions in the assessment of coronary reserve. Basic Research in Cardiology 105:1, 1-5
    CrossRef

  206. 206

    Stephan Windecker, Lorenz Räber. (2010) The DESIRE-Late Registry. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:1, 19-21
    CrossRef

  207. 207

    Morton J. Kern, Habib Samady. (2010) Current Concepts of Integrated Coronary Physiology in the Catheterization Laboratory. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 55:3, 173-185
    CrossRef

  208. 208

    Valentín Fuster. (2010) De la enfermedad multivaso compleja a la salud cardiovascular. Revista Española de Cardiología 63, 3-11
    CrossRef

  209. 209

    Agustín Albarrán, Josepa Mauri, Eduardo Pinar, José Antonio Baz. (2010) Actualización en cardiología intervencionista. Revista Española de Cardiología 63, 86-100
    CrossRef

  210. 210

    Alessandro Desideri. (2010) Invasive or Non-Iinvasive? That Is (Still) the Question. Circulation Journal 74:5, 1028
    CrossRef

  211. 211

    Akhil Kapur, Davide Bartolini, Malcolm C Finlay, Ayesha C Qureshi, Marcus Flather, Julian W Strange, Roger J Hall. (2010) The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 11:1, 26-33
    CrossRef

  212. 212

    O. Gaemperli, L. Husmann, T. Schepis, P. Koepfli, I. Valenta, W. Jenni, H. Alkadhi, T. F. Luscher, P. A. Kaufmann. (2009) Coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging to detect flow-limiting stenoses: a potential gatekeeper for coronary revascularization?. European Heart Journal 30:23, 2921-2929
    CrossRef

  213. 213

    Michael R. Freeman. (2009) Growing evidence that radionuclide imaging identifies management strategies that improve outcome. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 16:6, 844-845
    CrossRef

  214. 214

    Martijn Meuwissen, Maria Siebes, Steven AJ Chamuleau, Bart-Jan Verhoeff, Jose PS Henriques, Jos AE Spaan, Jan J Piek. (2009) Role of fractional and coronary flow reserve in clinical decision making in intermediate coronary lesions. Interventional Cardiology 1:2, 237-255
    CrossRef

  215. 215

    Helge Möllmann, Holger M. Nef, Christian W. Hamm, Michael Böhm, Bodo Cremers. (2009) Highlights from Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2009. Clinical Research in Cardiology 98:12, 811-817
    CrossRef

  216. 216

    Gioel Gabrio Secco, Carlo Di Mario. (2009) Conference Scene: A congress report. Interventional Cardiology 1:2, 161-164
    CrossRef

  217. 217

    Frederick G. Kushner, Mary Hand, Sidney C. Smith, Spencer B. King, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Elliott M. Antman, Steven R. Bailey, Eric R. Bates, James C. Blankenship, Donald E. Casey, Lee A. Green, Alice K. Jacobs, Judith S. Hochman, Harlan M. Krumholz, Douglass A. Morrison, Joseph P. Ornato, David L. Pearle, Eric D. Peterson, Michael A. Sloan, Patrick L. Whitlow, David O. Williams. (2009) 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 74:7, E25-E68
    CrossRef

  218. 218

    Frederick G. Kushner, Mary Hand, Sidney C. Smith, Spencer B. King, Jeffrey L. Anderson, Elliott M. Antman, Steven R. Bailey, Eric R. Bates, James C. Blankenship, Donald E. Casey, Lee A. Green, Judith S. Hochman, Alice K. Jacobs, Harlan M. Krumholz, Douglass A. Morrison, Joseph P. Ornato, David L. Pearle, Eric D. Peterson, Michael A. Sloan, Patrick L. Whitlow, David O. Williams. (2009) 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update). Journal of the American College of Cardiology 54:23, 2205-2241
    CrossRef

  219. 219

    Albert V.G. Bruschke, William C. Sheldon, Earl K. Shirey, William L. Proudfit. (2009) A Half Century of Selective Coronary Arteriography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 54:23, 2139-2144
    CrossRef

  220. 220

    Morton J. Kern. (2009) Use and abuse of IVUS and FFR by Magni V et al. or why you shouldn't believe the saying, “if you want to treat, use IVUS. If you don't, use FFR”. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 74:5, 811-813
    CrossRef

  221. 221

    Mohammed Saad, Ralph Toelg, Ahmed Khattab, Guido Kassner, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Gert Richardt. (2009) Determination of haemodynamic significance of intermediate coronary lesions using three-dimensional coronary reconstruction. EuroIntervention 5:5, 573-579
    CrossRef

  222. 222

    Valeria Magni, Alaide Chieffo, Antonio Colombo. (2009) Rebuttal: Response to Dr. Morton Kern. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 74:5, 814-814
    CrossRef

  223. 223

    W. Wijns, P. Kolh. (2009) Appropriate myocardial revascularization: a joint viewpoint from an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon. European Heart Journal 30:18, 2182-2185
    CrossRef

  224. 224

    Grace A Lin, Rita  F Redberg. (2009) Use of stress testing prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 7:9, 1061-1066
    CrossRef

  225. 225

    Sanjiv Kaul. (2009) Man Must Measure. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2:9, 1111-1113
    CrossRef

  226. 226

    Harvey S. Hecht. (2009) Is coronary computed tomographic angiography the “gold standard” for coronary artery disease?. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography 3:5, 334-339
    CrossRef

  227. 227

    William Wijns. (2009) The AUTAX (Austrian Multivessel TAXUS-Stent) Registry. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2:8, 728-730
    CrossRef

  228. 228

    K. Lance Gould. (2009) Does Coronary Flow Trump Coronary Anatomy?. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2:8, 1009-1023
    CrossRef

  229. 229

    Pieter J. Vlaar, Felix Zijlstra. (2009) Angiographic Restenosis and Clinical Recurrence After Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2:8, 776-778
    CrossRef

  230. 230

    Somjot S. Brar, Gregg W. Stone. (2009) Advances in percutaneous coronary intervention. Current Cardiology Reports 11:4, 245-251
    CrossRef

  231. 231

    Daniel S. Berman, James K. Min. (2009) Can Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Trigger Coronary Revascularization?. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2:6, 558-560
    CrossRef

  232. 232

    Giovanna Sarno, Isabel Decraemer, Piet K. Vanhoenacker, Bernard De Bruyne, Michalis Hamilos, Thomas Cuisset, Eric Wyffels, Jozef Bartunek, Guy R. Heyndrickx, William Wijns. (2009) On the Inappropriateness of Noninvasive Multidetector Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography to Trigger Coronary Revascularization. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2:6, 550-557
    CrossRef

  233. 233

    Kim A. Williams. (2009) Chronic kidney disease, SPECT, and coronary angiography: “head of gold and feet of clay?”. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 16:3, 345-347
    CrossRef

  234. 234

    (2009) Fractional Flow Reserve for Guiding PCI. New England Journal of Medicine 360:19, 2024-2027
    Full Text

  235. 235

    (2009) Coronary Angiography by 64-Row CT. New England Journal of Medicine 360:19, 2027-2031
    Full Text

  236. 236

    William F Fearon. (2009) Expanding role of fractional flow reserve in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 7:5, 447-449
    CrossRef

  237. 237

    Domenico Scrutinio, Pier Luigi Temporelli, Andrea Passantino, Pantaleo Giannuzzi. (2009) Long-term secondary prevention programs after cardiac rehabilitation for the reduction of future cardiovascular events: focus on regular physical activity. Future Cardiology 5:3, 297-314
    CrossRef

  238. 238

    Eike Nagel, João A.C. Lima, Richard T. George, Christopher M. Kramer. (2009) Newer Methods for Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2:5, 656-660
    CrossRef

  239. 239

    Nico H.J. Pijls. (2009) Acute Myocardial Infarction and Underlying Stenosis Severity. The American Journal of Cardiology 103:9, 1204-1205
    CrossRef

  240. 240

    Bryony M. Mearns. (2009) Coronary artery disease: Measuring FFR improves success of PCI. Nature Reviews Cardiology 6:4, 266-266
    CrossRef

  241. 241

    Eike Nagel. (2009) Taking the Last Hurdles: Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2:4, 434-436
    CrossRef

  242. 242

    Ellis, Stephen G., . (2009) Refining the Art and Science of Coronary Stenting. New England Journal of Medicine 360:3, 292-294
    Full Text

Letters