Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Estrogen Therapy and Coronary-Artery Calcification

JoAnn E. Manson, M.D., Dr.P.H., Matthew A. Allison, M.D., M.P.H., Jacques E. Rossouw, M.D., J. Jeffrey Carr, M.D., Robert D. Langer, M.D., M.P.H., Judith Hsia, M.D., Lewis H. Kuller, M.D., Dr.P.H., Barbara B. Cochrane, Ph.D., Julie R. Hunt, Ph.D., Shari E. Ludlam, M.P.H., Mary B. Pettinger, M.S., Margery Gass, M.D., Karen L. Margolis, M.D., M.P.H., Lauren Nathan, M.D., Judith K. Ockene, Ph.D., Ross L. Prentice, Ph.D., John Robbins, M.D., and Marcia L. Stefanick, Ph.D. for the WHI and WHI-CACS Investigators

N Engl J Med 2007; 356:2591-2602June 21, 2007

Abstract

Background

Calcified plaque in the coronary arteries is a marker for atheromatous-plaque burden and is predictive of future risk of cardiovascular events. We examined the relationship between estrogen therapy and coronary-artery calcium in the context of a randomized clinical trial.

Methods

In our ancillary substudy of the Women's Health Initiative trial of conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg per day) as compared with placebo in women who had undergone hysterectomy, we performed computed tomography of the heart in 1064 women aged 50 to 59 years at randomization. Imaging was conducted at 28 of 40 centers after a mean of 7.4 years of treatment and 1.3 years after the trial was completed (8.7 years after randomization). Coronary-artery calcium (or Agatston) scores were measured at a central reading center without knowledge of randomization status.

Results

The mean coronary-artery calcium score after trial completion was lower among women receiving estrogen (83.1) than among those receiving placebo (123.1) (P=0.02 by rank test). After adjustment for coronary risk factors, the multivariate odds ratios for coronary-artery calcium scores of more than 0, 10 or more, and 100 or more in the group receiving estrogen as compared with placebo were 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 1.04), 0.74 (0.55 to 0.99), and 0.69 (0.48 to 0.98), respectively. The corresponding odds ratios among women with at least 80% adherence to the study estrogen or placebo were 0.64 (P=0.01), 0.55 (P<0.001), and 0.46 (P=0.001). For coronary-artery calcium scores of more than 300 (vs. <10), the multivariate odds ratio was 0.58 (P=0.03) in an intention-to-treat analysis and 0.39 (P=0.004) among women with at least 80% adherence.

Conclusions

Among women 50 to 59 years old at enrollment, the calcified-plaque burden in the coronary arteries after trial completion was lower in women assigned to estrogen than in those assigned to placebo. However, estrogen has complex biologic effects and may influence the risk of cardiovascular events and other outcomes through multiple pathways. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000611.)

Media in This Article

Figure 1Multivariate Odds Ratios for a Coronary-Artery Calcium Score of More Than 100, According to Randomized-Group Assignment and Coronary-Risk-Factor Status.
Table 1Baseline Characteristics and Cardiovascular-Risk-Factor Status, According to Randomized-Group Assignment.
Article

Although it has been hypothesized that postmenopausal estrogen therapy delays atherosclerosis,1-3 recent findings from randomized clinical trials have cast doubt on a cardioprotective role of exogenous estrogen. The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial of conjugated equine estrogens, administered to postmenopausal women who had undergone hysterectomy, reported a hazard ratio of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.16) for nonfatal myocardial infarction plus fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) among women receiving conjugated equine estrogens as compared with those receiving placebo, but secondary analyses according to age group suggested that the results differed in younger women.4,5 The corresponding hazard ratio was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.36 to 1.08) for women 50 to 59 years old, as compared with 0.94 (0.71 to 1.24) for women 60 to 69 years old and 1.11 (0.82 to 1.52) for women 70 to 79 years old. The findings for the younger women, although limited by a small number of events related to CHD, were consistent with the results of previous observational studies, which tended to include women who initiated estrogen therapy early in menopause.1,6 Additional analyses in the WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens indicated a reduced risk of a need for coronary revascularization among women 50 to 59 years old who were receiving estrogen (hazard ratio 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.86) but not among older women.5

To explain the findings related to estrogen and CHD in younger women, we initiated an ancillary substudy of estrogen and coronary-artery calcium shortly after the WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens ended. The goal of the WHI Coronary-Artery Calcium Study (WHI-CACS) was to determine whether the coronary-artery calcium burden differed according to randomized-group assignment among women aged 50 to 59 years after a mean of 7.4 years. Atherosclerotic calcification in the coronary arteries is a subcomponent of atherosclerotic plaque and a marker of the total plaque burden in the coronary arteries7,8 and has been shown to be predictive of future cardiovascular events, independently of traditional risk factors.8-11 Vascular deposits of calcium develop as part of the chronic inflammatory process of atherosclerosis12; the calcified atheroma can be detected and quantified noninvasively, in a standardized and reproducible manner, on computed tomography (CT) of the heart.8,13-16 Previous studies of postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary-artery calcium have been observational only and have generally suggested a reduced prevalence of coronary-artery calcium among hormone users.17-19 To our knowledge, the relationship between hormone therapy and the prevalence and extent of calcified plaque in the coronary arteries has not been previously assessed in the context of a randomized trial.

Methods

WHI Trial of Estrogen Alone

Detailed descriptions of the design of the WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens and the baseline characteristics of the participants have been published previously.4,20,21 Briefly, the participants were postmenopausal women who were 50 to 79 years of age at randomization and had undergone hysterectomy. We randomly assigned the participants to receive oral conjugated equine estrogens (0.625 mg per day) (Premarin, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals) or placebo. Methods regarding data collection, data management, and assurance of the quality of the data have been published previously.22

The WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens was originally scheduled to continue until close-out visits between October 2004 and March 2005. However, the National Institutes of Health stopped the trial approximately 1 year early, owing to an increased risk of stroke in the absence of apparent benefit for the risk of CHD.4 Study participants were informed of this decision on March 1, 2004, were instructed to discontinue the study medication, and were informed of their group assignment. Although the evidence suggested a reduced risk of CHD among the women aged 50 to 59 years who were receiving conjugated equine estrogens,4,5 the statistical power of the study was inadequate to provide conclusive results. Therefore, an explanatory ancillary substudy (WHI-CACS) was proposed to provide mechanistic information that might elucidate this finding. WHI-CACS was restricted to women aged 50 to 59 years, both to clarify the results concerning conjugated equine estrogens in this age group and because this age group is the most clinically relevant with regard to initiation of hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms.

Design of the Ancillary Study (WHI-CACS)

A total of 28 of the 40 WHI clinical centers were in close proximity to the requisite imaging facilities and had the ability to mobilize quickly to participate in WHI-CACS. A central reading center at Wake Forest University School of Medicine was selected by means of a competitive bidding process. After the study was approved by central and local institutional review boards, we mailed invitational letters to the 1742 eligible women among the 2271 women who had participated in the trial of conjugated equine estrogens at these 28 centers and who were 50 to 59 years old at the time of randomization in the WHI trial. Exclusion criteria were a request by the participant for no further clinic visits, a weight of 300 lb (136 kg) or higher (owing to technical restrictions), or a loss to follow-up or death since randomization. A total of 529 of the original participants (23.3%) were excluded for one or more of these reasons. A total of 1079 women (61.9% of the 1742 eligible participants at the 28 clinical centers) provided written informed consent and underwent CT examinations of the heart between May 2005 and September 2005. Because the study period was a mean of 7.4 years and coronary-artery calcium was measured on average 1.3 years after the trial, the women had a mean age of 64.8 years at the time of the coronary-artery calcium measurements.

Measurement of Calcified Plaques

Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries was performed with the use of electron-beam or multidetector-row CT at the 28 participating centers, all of which used CT systems with the capability to acquire cardiac images in approximately 250 msec or less. A standardized protocol was developed on the basis of previous multicenter experience with CT of the heart.13,14 Phantom and test images were obtained with the use of each CT system to verify technical settings and system performance. The measurements were analyzed at a central reading center at Wake Forest University without knowledge of randomization status.13 The Agatston scores23 were calculated at a computer workstation (TeraRecon) by experienced image analysts using established criteria.8,13,23

Twelve women were excluded owing to a history of coronary revascularization procedures before randomization or missing data on this variable, and three women were excluded because of incomplete scans. In addition, the reading protocol specified the exclusion of data from patients with coronary stents, pacemakers, metallic clips, and other surgical remnants. The final data set represented 1064 participants.

Statistical Analysis

Baseline cardiovascular risk factors and other characteristics of participants receiving conjugated equine estrogens and those receiving placebo were tested for differences with the use of t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Coronary-artery calcium scores in the group receiving estrogen and the placebo group were compared with the use of the Kruskal–Wallis rank test. Because the distribution of coronary-artery calcium scores was skewed, with 53% of participants having scores of 0, we also performed tobit regression analyses for left-censored data, using a cube root transformation (to the coronary-artery calcium score + 1).24 Coronary-artery calcium scores were also grouped as follows: 0 (no calcification), 1 to less than 10 (minimal calcification), 10 to 100 (mild calcification), 101 to 300 (moderate calcification), and more than 300 (extensive calcification).8,25,26 Associations between study group and coronary-artery calcium score were assessed with the use of dichotomous logistic-regression analysis for coronary-artery calcium scores of more than 0 (vs. 0), 10 or more (vs. <10), and 100 or more (vs. <100), as well as ordinal (polychotomous) logistic-regression analysis for higher scores.

Primary analyses were conducted according to the intention-to-treat design, with and without further adjustment for coronary risk factors. Additional models also involved adjustment for educational level, presence or absence of a history of oophorectomy, reproductive status, and presence or absence of randomization in the WHI diet-modification trial, the WHI calcium and vitamin D trial, or both trials. Inverse-probability-of-censoring weighted analyses27 were also conducted to estimate the results for all eligible women in the WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens. Secondary analyses, restricted to women with at least 80% adherence to the study medication for at least 5 years, were performed with and without multivariate adjustment. All P values are two-sided, and P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed with the use of SAS statistical software, version 9 (SAS Institute).

Results

Cardiovascular risk factors and other characteristics at baseline were similar among WHI-CACS participants receiving conjugated equine estrogens and those receiving placebo (Table 1Table 1Baseline Characteristics and Cardiovascular-Risk-Factor Status, According to Randomized-Group Assignment.). There were no significant differences between the two groups on the basis of age, race or ethnic group, traditional coronary risk factors, or key lifestyle or reproductive variables. In addition, the coronary-risk-factor status among the participants was similar to that among all women of eligible age in the WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens.

Among the 1064 participants for whom coronary-artery calcium scores were available, the mean (±SD) score was 102.9±303.5, with a range of 0.0 to 4506.6. The mean score was 83.1 among women receiving conjugated equine estrogens and 123.1 among women receiving placebo (P=0.02 by the Kruskal–Wallis rank test) (Table 2Table 2Distribution of Coronary-Artery Calcium Scores after Trial Completion, According to Randomized-Group Assignment.). The 50th, 60th, 75th, and 95th percentile values of the coronary-artery calcium scores were 0, 3, 43, and 452 for conjugated equine estrogens and 0, 17, 84, and 689 for placebo, respectively.

The tobit regression analyses, which were performed to assess the overall distribution of coronary-artery calcium scores,24 showed that the overall distribution of scores was significantly lower in the group receiving estrogen than in the placebo group (Table 2). After adjustment for age, race or ethnic group, and coronary-risk-factor status, the multivariate P value for this difference was 0.03 in intention-to-treat analyses. The multivariate P value was 0.002 when analyses were restricted to participants who had at least 80% adherence to the study treatment (estrogen or placebo) for at least 5 years (Table 2).

In analyses of the prevalence of coronary-artery calcium, multivariate odds ratios for coronary-artery calcium scores of more than 0 (vs. 0), 10 or more (vs. <10), and 100 or more (vs. <100) were 0.78, 0.74, and 0.69, respectively (Table 3Table 3Coronary-Artery Calcium Scores after Trial Completion, According to Score Category.). In secondary analyses restricted to data for women with at least 80% adherence for at least 5 years, the corresponding multivariate odds ratios were substantially reduced: 0.64 (P=0.01), 0.55 (P<0.001), and 0.46 (P=0.001), respectively (Table 3).

To examine higher levels of coronary-artery calcium, we conducted prespecified ordinal logistic-regression analyses, using a coronary calcium score of less than 10 as the reference category (Table 4Table 4Odds Ratios for Various Categories of Elevation in the Coronary-Artery Calcium Score.).10,25 In intention-to-treat analyses, women receiving estrogen had a multivariate odds ratio of 0.58 (P=0.03) for extensive coronary-artery calcification (score >300); in secondary analyses restricted to women with at least 80% adherence, the multivariate odds ratio was 0.39 (P=0.004) (Table 4).

Further adjustment for additional variables — including educational level, presence or absence of a history of oophorectomy, reproductive status, and presence or absence of randomization in the WHI diet-modification trial, the WHI calcium and vitamin D trial, or both trials — did not materially alter the results. In ordinal logistic-regression analyses, with a coronary-artery calcium score of less than 10 as the reference category, the odds ratios for coronary-artery calcium scores of more than 100 and more than 300 in the estrogen group were 0.66 and 0.57, respectively (P=0.04 for both comparisons), and were 0.44 (P=0.002) and 0.41 (P=0.009), respectively, among women with at least 80% adherence. Inverse-probability-of-censoring weighted analyses,27 conducted to estimate the results for all eligible women in the WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens, provided similar findings.

The odds ratios for a coronary-artery calcium score of more than 100, among participants receiving conjugated equine estrogens as compared with those receiving placebo, are shown in Figure 1Figure 1Multivariate Odds Ratios for a Coronary-Artery Calcium Score of More Than 100, According to Randomized-Group Assignment and Coronary-Risk-Factor Status., as are the associations between traditional risk factors for CHD and coronary-artery calcium scores. Past or current smoking and the presence of hypertension, a high cholesterol level, and diabetes were all strongly predictive of elevated coronary-artery calcium scores. However, these risk factors did not significantly alter the relationship between treatment with conjugated equine estrogens and coronary-artery calcium scores (all P values for interaction >0.30).

Discussion

The WHI-CACS assessed the post-trial burden of calcified atheroma in the coronary arteries in women 50 to 59 years old at the time of randomization in the WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens. An average of 8.7 years after randomization, women receiving estrogen had a lower prevalence and quantity of coronary-artery calcium than those receiving placebo, with odds ratios for high levels of coronary-artery calcium generally 30 to 40% lower in intention-to-treat analyses and 60% lower in analyses among women with at least 80% adherence to the study medication for at least 5 years. The results remained robust and significant in analyses that involved diverse analytic approaches. These findings, in conjunction with the suggestion of a reduced risk of clinical coronary events among women treated with conjugated equine estrogens in this age group,5 are consistent with previous evidence from laboratory, animal, and observational studies.2,3,6

Previous studies of postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary-artery calcium have been observational only. Like observational studies of hormone therapy and clinical coronary events that have suggested cardiac benefits,1,28 most previous coronary imaging studies indicate that users of hormone therapy have less coronary-artery calcium than nonusers.17-19,29 However, observational studies may be susceptible to bias — in particular, confounding by health-promoting behaviors associated with the choice to use hormone therapy — underscoring the need to examine these relationships in the context of randomized clinical trials.6,30

Coronary-artery calcification serves as a marker of calcified atheroma and total plaque burden.7,8,13,16 The presence of calcium in atherosclerotic lesions reflects the progression from simple fatty streaks to complex plaques, and coronary calcium measurements have been shown to be directly related to histologic measures of atheromatous plaques.7,31 In a large cross-sectional study, the risk of CHD increased by a factor of 30 from the lowest to the highest quartile of coronary-artery calcium scores.26 In our study, traditional coronary risk factors were strongly associated with increased quantities of coronary-artery calcium, providing support for the role of this measure as a marker of atherosclerosis. Moreover, coronary-artery calcium measurements have been shown to be highly predictive of future cardiovascular events in several studies, independently of traditional risk factors.8-11

The new findings from WHI-CACS indicate that estrogen therapy initiated in women at 50 to 59 years of age is related to a reduced plaque burden in the coronary arteries and a reduced prevalence of subclinical coronary artery disease, providing support for the hypothesis that estrogen therapy may have cardioprotective effects in younger women. Although the WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens suggested that younger women, but not older women, may have a reduced risk of myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization when using estrogen, statistical tests for an interaction according to age were nonsignificant (range of P values, 0.07 to 0.09).5 Estrogen has complex biologic effects that may vary according to the underlying state of the vasculature and other tissues.30,32-34 Conclusive answers, however, can be derived only from large-scale trials involving sufficient numbers of clinical events among women in early menopause.

The strengths of our study include the randomized design of the main WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens, the relatively long duration of treatment with estrogen, the standardized assessment of coronary-artery calcium at a central reading center, and the large number of women studied, providing good statistical power to detect moderate associations. However, limitations of the study also warrant consideration. In the WHI trial of conjugated equine estrogens, a large percentage of women had stopped taking the study medication before the trial was terminated, and an average of 1.3 years had elapsed between completion of the trial and coronary-artery calcium measurement. Both of these limitations, however, would lead to an attenuation of the association between treatment with conjugated equine estrogens and coronary-artery calcium scores and would not explain our findings.

Although WHI-CACS did not include all participants who had undergone randomization in the estrogen trial and coronary-artery calcium measurements were not available before randomization, the distributions of coronary risk factors and behavioral characteristics at baseline were similar among the women receiving estrogen and those receiving placebo. In addition, adjustment for a large number of variables potentially related to participation or adherence did not result in a weakening of the associations. It would have been of interest to have coronary-artery calcium measurements for women in the older age groups, to allow a comparison of findings for younger and older women. Logistic and operational constraints precluded imaging of the full cohort without a substantial extension of the interval between the discontinuation of study medication and the measurement of coronary-artery calcium.

Moreover, coronary-artery calcium measurements in the older women would not have necessarily informed or elucidated our findings with respect to CHD among participants 50 to 59 years of age. It is possible that estrogen could reduce coronary-artery calcium scores but still increase the risk of clinical CHD events, owing to adverse effects on thrombosis and plaque rupture, which are more likely in older women with advanced stages of atherosclerosis. Such a duality of effects would not necessarily apply to younger women with lower burdens of atherosclerosis. Data from studies of nonhuman primates suggest that estrogen inhibits the progression of atherosclerosis during the early period after bilateral oophorectomy but not later,3 and previous angiographic trials involving women with CHD have suggested that hormone therapy does not prevent atherosclerosis progression in high-risk women.35,36 The WHI-CACS focused on women 50 to 59 years old because women in this age group are most likely to be engaged in decision making about whether to use hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms.

In conclusion, the results of WHI-CACS indicate that women 50 to 59 years old when they were randomly assigned to receive conjugated equine estrogens had a lower coronary-plaque burden and a lower prevalence of subclinical coronary artery disease after completion of the WHI trial of estrogen than did women receiving placebo. These findings, in conjunction with the data on clinical CHD events among younger women in the WHI trial, provide some reassurance that estrogen is unlikely to have an adverse effect on the risk of coronary events among women who have recently undergone menopause and are considering hormone therapy for the treatment of menopausal symptoms. However, the possibility of a favorable effect of estrogen on atherosclerosis in younger women requires confirmation in future studies,37,38 and other risks and benefits of treatment4,39 must be considered. We could not address the question of whether any vascular benefits of treatment with estrogen initiated at a younger age will, with prolonged use, persist at older ages. Additional research on various formulations and regimens of hormone therapy will also be important. In the meantime, hormone therapy should not be initiated (or continued) for the express purpose of preventing cardiovascular disease in either younger or older postmenopausal women. The current recommendations from many organizations that hormone therapy be limited to the treatment of moderate-to-severe menopausal symptoms, with the lowest effective dose used for the shortest duration necessary, remain appropriate.

Supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Wyeth provided the study pills (active and placebo) for the trial but had no other role in the study.

Dr. Langer reports serving as an expert witness for Wyeth in matters related to hormone therapy. Dr. Gass reports receiving consulting or advisory fees from Eli Lilly, Organon, Wyeth, Esprit, and Procter & Gamble; lecture fees from Organon; and grant support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Organon, Procter & Gamble, and Wyeth. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

We thank the investigators and staff at the WHI clinical centers, the WHI-CACS centers, the WHI Clinical Coordinating Center, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Program Office for their dedication; Bernedine Lund and Alyssa Smith at the WHI Clinical Coordinating Center for their expert assistance; and above all, the WHI participants for their extraordinary commitment to research on women's health.

Source Information

From Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (J.E.M.); the University of California, San Diego, San Diego (M.A.A.); the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (J.E.R., S.E.L.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (J.J.C.); Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA (R.D.L.); George Washington University, Washington, DC (J.H.); the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (L.H.K.); the University of Washington (B.B.C.) and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (J.R.H., M.B.P., R.L.P.) — both in Seattle; the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati (M.G.); HealthPartners Research Foundation and the University of Minnesota — both in Minneapolis (K.L.M.); the University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles (L.N.); the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (J.K.O.); the University of California at Davis, Sacramento (J.R.); and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA (M.L.S.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Manson at the Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Ave. E., 3rd Fl., Boston, MA 02215, or at .

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Investigators and the WHI Coronary-Artery Calcium Study (WHI-CACS) Investigators are listed in the Appendix.

Appendix

The Women's Health Initiative Coronary-Artery Calcium Study Investigators are as follows: Program Office, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD: J.E. Rossouw, S. Ludlam; Clinical Coordinating Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle: B.B. Cochrane, J.R. Hunt, B. Lund, R. Prentice; Computed Tomography Reading Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC: J.J. Carr, C. O'Rourke, L. Du, S. Pillsbury, C. Hightower, R. Ellison, J. Tan; Clinical Centers: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY — S. Wassertheil-Smoller, M. Magnani, D.H. Noble, T. Dellicarpini; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston — J.E. Manson, M. Bueche, A.D. McGinnis, F.J. Rybicki; Brown University, Providence, RI — A.R. Assaf, G. Sloane; Emory University, Atlanta — L.S. Phillips, V. Butler, M. Huber, J. Vitali; George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC — J. Hsia, C. LeBrun, R. Palm, D. Embersit; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR — E. Whitlock, K. Arnold; Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA — S. Sidney, V. Cantrell; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee — J.M. Kotchen, C. Feltz; MedStar Research Institute–Howard University, Washington, DC — B.V. Howard, A. Thomas-Geevarghese, G. Boggs, J.S. Jelinick; Northwestern University, Chicago and Evanston, IL — P. Greenland, A. Neuman, G. Carlson-Lund, S.M. Giovanazzi; Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, CA — M.L. Stefanick, S. Swope; Ohio State University, Columbus — R. Jackson, K. Toussant; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham — C.E. Lewis, P. Pierce, C. Stallings; University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY — J. Wactawski-Wende, S. Goel, R. Laughlin; University of California at Davis, Sacramento — J. Robbins, S. Zaragoza, D. Macias, D. Belisle; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles — L. Nathan, B. Voigt, J. Goldin, M. Woo; University of California at San Diego, LaJolla and Chula Vista — R.D. Langer, M.A. Allison, X. Lien, C.M. Wright; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati — M. Gass, S. Sheridan; University of Iowa, Iowa City and Davenport — J.G. Robinson, D. Feddersen, K. Kelly-Brake, J. Carroll; University of Massachusetts–Fallon Clinic, Worcester — J. Ockene, L. Churchill; University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark — N.L. Lasser, B. Miller, P.D. Maldjian, J. Pierre-Louis; University of Miami, Miami — J. Fishman, M.J. O'Sullivan, D. Fernandez; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis — K.L. Margolis, C.L. Bjerk, C. Truwit, J.A. Hearity; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill — W.B. Hyslop, K. Darroch, C. Murphy, G. Heiss; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh — L.H. Kuller, D. Edmundowicz, D. Ives; University of Tennessee, Memphis — K.C. Johnson, S. Satterfield, S.A. Connelly, E.L. Jones; University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio — R. Brzyski, M.A. Nashawati, S. Torchia, A. Rodriguez, R. Garza, P. Nentwich; University of Wisconsin, Madison — G.E. Sarto, L. Broderick, N.K. Sweitzer.

The Women's Health Initiative Study Investigators are as follows: Program Office, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD: E. Nabel, J.E. Rossouw, S.E. Ludlam, L. Pottern, J. McGowan, L. Ford, N. Geller; Clinical Coordinating Center: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle — RL. Prentice, G. Anderson, A. LaCroix, C.L. Kooperberg, R.E. Patterson, A. McTiernan; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC — S. Shumaker; Medical Research Labs, Highland Heights, KY — E. Stein; University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco — S. Cummings; Clinical Centers: Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY — S. Wassertheil-Smoller; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston — J. Hays; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston — J.E. Manson; Brown University, Providence, RI — A.R. Assaf; Emory University, Atlanta — L. Phillips; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle — S. Beresford; George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC — J. Hsia; Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor–University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance — R. Chlebowski; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR — E. Whitlock; Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA — B. Caan; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee — J.M. Kotchen; MedStar Research Institute–Howard University, Washington, DC — B.V. Howard; Northwestern University, Chicago and Evanston, IL — L. Van Horn; Rush Medical Center, Chicago — H. Black; Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, CA — M.L. Stefanick; State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook — D. Lane; Ohio State University, Columbus — R. Jackson; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham — C.E. Lewis; University of Arizona, Tucson and Phoenix — T. Bassford; University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY — J. Wactawski-Wende; University of California at Davis, Sacramento — J. Robbins; University of California at Irvine, Irvine — F.A. Hubbell; University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles — H. Judd; University of California at San Diego, La Jolla/Chula Vista — R.D. Langer; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati — M. Gass; University of Florida, Gainesville and Jacksonville — M. Limacher; University of Hawaii, Honolulu — D. Curb; University of Iowa, Iowa City and Davenport — R. Wallace; University of Massachusetts–Fallon Clinic, Worcester — J. Ockene; University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark — N. Lasser; University of Miami, Miami — M.J. O'Sullivan; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis — K.L. Margolis; University of Nevada, Reno — R. Brunner; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill — G. Heiss; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh — L.H. Kuller; University of Tennessee, Memphis — K.C. Johnson; University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio — R. Brzyski; University of Wisconsin, Madison — G.E. Sarto; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC — D. Bonds; Wayne State University School of Medicine–Hutzel Hospital, Detroit — S. Hendrix.

References

References

  1. 1

    Grodstein F, Stampfer M. The epidemiology of coronary heart disease and estrogen replacement in postmenopausal women. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1995;38:199-210
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1801-1811
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Mikkola TS, Clarkson TB. Estrogen replacement therapy, atherosclerosis, and vascular function. Cardiovasc Res 2002;53:605-619
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Anderson GL, Limacher M, Assaf AR, et al. Effects of conjugated equine estrogens in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:1701-1712
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Hsia J, Langer RD, Manson JE, et al. Conjugated equine estrogens and coronary heart disease: the Women's Health Initiative. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:357-365[Erratum, Arch Intern Med 2006;166:759.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Grodstein F, Clarkson TB, Manson JE. Understanding the divergent data on postmenopausal hormone therapy. N Engl J Med 2003;348:645-650
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Mautner GC, Mautner SL, Froehlich J, et al. Coronary artery calcification: assessment with electron beam CT and histomorphometric correlation. Radiology 1994;192:619-623
    Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006;114:1761-1791
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, Newstein D, Guerci AD. Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1253-1260
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Raggi P, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Callister TQ. Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in subjects with and without diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1663-1669
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC. Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2004;291:210-215[Erratum, JAMA 2004;291:563.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Stary HC. The development of calcium deposits in atherosclerotic lesions and their persistence after lipid regression. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:16E-19E
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Carr JJ, Nelson JC, Wong ND, et al. Measuring calcified coronary plaque with cardiac CT in population based studies: the standardized protocol of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA). Radiology 2005;234:35-43
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Detrano RC, Anderson M, Nelson J, et al. Coronary artery calcium measurements: effect of CT scanner type and calcium measure on the rescan reproducibility -- MESA Study. Radiology 2005;236:477-484
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Carr JJ, Crouse JR III, Goff DC Jr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Peterson NP, Burke GL. Evaluation of subsecond gated helical CT for quantification of coronary artery calcium and comparison with electron beam CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:915-921
    Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Allison MA, Criqui MH, Wright CM. Patterns and risk factors for systemic calcified atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24:331-336
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Schisterman EF, Gallagher AM, Bairey Merz CN, et al. The association of hormone replacement therapy and coronary calcium as determined by electron beam tomography. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2002;11:631-638
    CrossRef | Medline

  18. 18

    Akhrass F, Evans AT, Wang Y, et al. Hormone replacement therapy is associated with less coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:5611-5614
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Barrett-Connor E, Laughlin GA. Hormone therapy and coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic postmenopausal women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. Menopause 2005;12:40-48
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    The Women's Health Initiative Study Group. Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. Control Clin Trials 1998;19:61-109
    CrossRef | Medline

  21. 21

    Stefanick ML, Cochrane BB, Hsia J, Barad DH, Liu JH, Johnson SR. The Women's Health Initiative postmenopausal hormone trials: overview and baseline characteristics of participants. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13:Suppl:S78-S86
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Anderson GL, Manson J, Wallace R, et al. Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative study design. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13:Suppl:S5-S17
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;15:827-832
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Han C, Kronmal R. Box-Cox transformation of left-censored data with application to the analysis of coronary artery calcification and pharmacokinetic data. Stat Med 2004;23:3671-3679
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF II, Breen JF, Fitzpatrick LA, Schwartz RS. Electron beam computed tomography and coronary artery disease: scanning for coronary artery calcification. Mayo Clin Proc 1996;71:369-377
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Cheng YJ, Church TS, Kimball TE, et al. Comparison of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in patients with to those without symptomatic coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:498-503
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  27. 27

    Robins JM, Finkelstein DM. Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an AIDS clinical trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log-rank tests. Biometrics 2000;56:779-781
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Grady D, Rubin SM, Petitti DB, et al. Hormone therapy to prevent disease and prolong life in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:1016-1037
    Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Budoff MJ, Chen GP, Hunter CJ, et al. Effects of hormone replacement on progression of coronary calcium as measured by electron beam tomography. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2005;14:410-417
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    Manson JE, Bassuk SS, Harman M, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy: new questions and the case for new clinical trials. Menopause 2006;13:139-147
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Sangiorgi G, Rumberger JA, Severson A, et al. Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:126-133
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Chae CU, Manson JE. Postmenopausal hormone therapy. In: Manson JE, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Gaziano JM, eds. Clinical trials in heart disease. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier, 2004:349-63.

  33. 33

    Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. Molecular and cellular basis of cardiovascular and gender differences. Science 2005;308:1583-1587
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    Phillips LD, Langer RD. Postmenopausal hormone therapy: critical reappraisal and a unified hypothesis. Fertil Steril 2005;83:558-566
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  35. 35

    Herrington DM, Reboussin DM, Brosnihan KB, et al. Effects of estrogen replacement on the progression of coronary-artery atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:522-529
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  36. 36

    Waters DD, Alderman EL, Hsia J, et al. Effects of hormone replacement therapy and antioxidant vitamin supplements on coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:2432-2440
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  37. 37

    Harman SM, Brinton EA, Cedars M, et al. KEEPS: the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study. Climacteric 2005;8:3-12
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  38. 38

    ELITE: Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Aging, 2007. (Accessed May 25, 2007, at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00114517.)

  39. 39

    Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:321-333
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (160)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Geer Mohammad Ishaq, Pz Tasaduq Hussain, Mir Javid Iqbal, Mohsin Bin Mushtaq. (2013) Risk-Benefit Analysis of Combination Versus Unopposed HRT in Post-Menopausal Women. International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare 1:4, 61-76
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Masahiro Akishita, Jing Yu. (2012) Hormonal effects on blood vessels. Hypertension Research
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Amos Pines. (2012) Climacteric Commentaries. Climacteric 15:1, 95-102
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Kei Izumiyama, Tomohiro Osanai, Shigeki Sagara, Yuko Yamamoto, Taihei Itoh, Takanori Sukekawa, Fumie Nishizaki, Koji Magota, Ken Okumura. (2012) Estrogen attenuates coupling factor 6-induced salt-sensitive hypertension and cardiac systolic dysfunction in mice. Hypertension Research
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Monika Puzianowska-Kuźnicka. (2012) ESR1 in myocardial infarction. Clinica Chimica Acta 413:1-2, 81-87
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Kate Maclaran, John C Stevenson. (2012) Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with HRT. Women's Health 8:1, 63-74
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Mohamed M. El-Seweidy, Hoda E. Mohamed, Mervat E. Asker, Hebatallah H. Atteia. (2012) Nicotine and vascular endothelial dysfunction in female ovariectomized rats: role of estrogen replacement therapy. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 64:1, 108-119
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    I. Lambrinoudaki, A. Augoulea, E. Armeni, D. Rizos, A. Alexandrou, M. Creatsa, M. Kazani, G. Georgiopoulos, A. Livada, A. Exarchakou, K. Stamatelopoulos. (2011) Menopausal symptoms are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis in healthy recently postmenopausal women. Climacteric1-8
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Hiroshi Wada, Fuminori Hirano, Tatsuhiko Kuroda, Masataka Shiraki. (2011) Breast arterial calcification and hypertension associated with vertebral fracture. Geriatrics & Gerontology Internationalno-no
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Zahiruddin Othman, Nazlahshaniza Shafin, Rahimah Zakaria, Nik Hazlina Nik Hussain, Wan Mohd Zahiruddin Wan Mohammad. (2011) Improvement in immediate memory after 16 weeks of tualang honey (Agro Mas) supplement in healthy postmenopausal women. Menopause 18:11, 1219-1224
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Chrisandra L. Shufelt, B. Delia Johnson, Sarah L. Berga, Glenn D. Braunstein, Steven E. Reis, Vera Bittner, YuChing Yang, Carl J. Pepine, Barry L. Sharaf, George Sopko, Sheryl F. Kelsey, C. Noel Bairey Merz. (2011) Timing of hormone therapy, type of menopause, and coronary disease in women. Menopause 18:9, 943-950
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Cahide Gökkuşu, Zeynep Özbek, Gülten Tata. (2011) Hormone replacement therapy: relation to homocysteine and prooxidant-antioxidant status in healthy postmenopausal women. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    S. Heliövaara-Peippo, R. Oksjoki, K. Halmesmäki, R. Kaaja, J. Teperi, S. Grenman, A. Kivelä, H.-M. Surcel, E. Tomas, M. Tuppurainen, R. Hurskainen, J. Paavonen. (2011) The effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on cardiovascular disease risk factors in menorrhagia patients: A 10-year follow-up of a randomised trial. Maturitas 69:4, 354-358
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Fa-lin Yang, Ke-qing Hu, Xin Wang, Zi-mo Liu, Qin Hu, Ji-fu Li, Hong He. (2011) Combination of raloxifene, aspirin and estrogen as novel paradigm of hormone replacement therapy in rabbit model of menopause. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 32:8, 1031-1037
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Y. Miyabara, J. Camp, D. Holmes, B. Lahr, K. Bailey, V. M. Miller, A. E. Kearns. (2011) Coronary arterial calcification and thoracic spine mineral density in early menopause. Climacteric 14:4, 438-444
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Hyo Eun Park, Min-Kyung Kim, Su-Yeon Choi, Whal Lee, Chan Soo Shin, Sang-Heon Cho, Byung-Hee Oh. (2011) The prevalence and distribution of coronary artery calcium in asymptomatic Korean population. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    C. Kim, A. V. Diez-Roux, J. A. Nettleton, J. F. Polak, W. S. Post, D. S. Siscovick, K. E. Watson, A. M. Vahratian. (2011) Sex Differences in Subclinical Atherosclerosis by Race/Ethnicity in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. American Journal of Epidemiology 174:2, 165-172
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Jasmin Divers, Thomas C Register, Carl D Langefeld, Lynne E Wagenknecht, Donald W Bowden, J Jeffrey Carr, R Caresse Hightower, Jianzhao Xu, Keith A Hruska, Barry I Freedman. (2011) Relationships between calcified atherosclerotic plaque and bone mineral density in African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 26:7, 1554-1560
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Donna Shoupe. (2011) Individualizing hormone therapy to minimize risk: accurate assessment of risks and benefits. Women's Health 7:4, 475-485
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Karen Roush. (2011) Menopausal Hormone Therapy: What We Know Now. AJN, American Journal of Nursing 111:6, 38-47
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    David R. Rubinow, Susan S. Girdler. (2011) Hormones, heart disease, and health: individualized medicine versus throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Depression and Anxiety 28:6, E1-E15
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Pascal Rossi, Yves Francès, Bronwyn A Kingwell, Anna A Ahimastos. (2011) Gender differences in artery wall biomechanical properties throughout life. Journal of Hypertension 29:6, 1023-1033
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Pauliina Tuomikoski, Olavi Ylikorkala, Tomi S. Mikkola. (2011) Menopausal hot flushes and vascular health. Annals of Medicine 43:4, 283-291
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Kwang-Il Kim, Jung-Won Suh, Su-Yeon Choi, Hyuk-Jae Chang, Dong-Ju Choi, Cheol-Ho Kim, Byung-Hee Oh. (2011) Is reduced bone mineral density independently associated with coronary artery calcification in subjects older than 50 years?. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 29:3, 369-376
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Matthew A. Allison, JoAnn E. Manson, Aaron Aragaki, Charles B. Eaton, Judith Hsai, Lawrence Phillips, Lewis Kuller, Maurizio Trevisan. (2011) Resting Heart Rate and Coronary Artery Calcium in Postmenopausal Women. Journal of Women's Health 20:5, 661-669
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Qun-yi Li, Li Chen, Yan-hui Zhu, Meng Zhang, Yi-ping Wang, Ming-wei Wang. (2011) Involvement of estrogen receptor-β in farrerol inhibition of rat thoracic aorta vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 32:4, 433-440
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    David R. Rubinow, Susan S. Girdler. (2011) Hormones, heart disease, and health: individualized medicine versus throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Depression and Anxiety 28:4, 282-296
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    S. Mitchell Harman, Eric Vittinghoff, Eliot A. Brinton, Matthew J. Budoff, Marcelle I. Cedars, Rogerio A. Lobo, George R. Merriam, Virginia M. Miller, Frederick Naftolin, Lubna Pal, Nanette Santoro, Hugh S. Taylor, Dennis M. Black. (2011) Timing and Duration of Menopausal Hormone Treatment May Affect Cardiovascular Outcomes. The American Journal of Medicine 124:3, 199-205
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Kun Don Yi, Evelyn Perez, Shaohua Yang, Ran Liu, Douglas F. Covey, James W. Simpkins. (2011) The assessment of non-feminizing estrogens for use in neuroprotection. Brain Research 1379, 61-70
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Xiao-Ping Yang, Jane F Reckelhoff. (2011) Estrogen, hormonal replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 20:2, 133-138
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Walter A. Rocca, Brandon R. Grossardt, Lynne T. Shuster. (2011) Oophorectomy, menopause, estrogen treatment, and cognitive aging: Clinical evidence for a window of opportunity. Brain Research 1379, 188-198
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Matthew A. Allison, JoAnn E. Manson. (2011) Age, hormone therapy use, coronary heart disease, and mortality. Menopause 18:3, 243-245
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Howard N. Hodis, Wendy J. Mack. (2011) A “window of opportunity:” The reduction of coronary heart disease and total mortality with menopausal therapies is age- and time-dependent. Brain Research 1379, 244-252
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Alfred O. Mueck, Xiangyan Ruan. (2011) Benefits and risks during HRT: main safety issue breast cancer. Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation 5:2, 105-116
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Anna Fenton, Nick Panay. (2011) Calcium supplementation: is there a cardiovascular risk?. Climacteric 14:1, 1-2
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    D-Y. Lee, J-Y. Kim, J-H. Kim, D-S. Choi, D-K. Kim, K. K. Koh, B-K. Yoon. (2011) Effects of hormone therapy on ambulatory blood pressure in postmenopausal Korean women. Climacteric 14:1, 92-99
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    N. Botto, S. Maffei, S. Manfredi, M. G. Colombo, A. M. Mazzone, M G. Andreassi. (2011) Prothrombotic mutations, family history and the risk of thrombosis in postmenopausal women: implications for hormone replacement therapy. Climacteric 14:1, 25-30
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    James W. Simpkins, Kun Don Yi, Evelyn Perez, Douglas Covey. 2011. Structure-Nongenomic Neuroprotection Relationship of Estrogens and Estrogen-Derived Compounds. , 13-28.
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Lynne E. Wagenknecht, Jasmin Divers, Alain G. Bertoni, Carl D. Langefeld, J. Jeffrey Carr, Donald W. Bowden, Steven C. Elbein, Steven Shea, Cora E. Lewis, Barry I. Freedman. (2011) Correlates of Coronary Artery Calcified Plaque in Blacks and Whites with Type 2 Diabetes. Annals of Epidemiology 21:1, 34-41
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Karin Schenck-Gustafsson, Mark Brincat, C. Tamer Erel, Marco Gambacciani, Irene Lambrinoudaki, Mette H. Moen, Florence Tremollieres, Svetlana Vujovic Serge Rozenberg, Margaret Rees. (2011) EMAS position statement: Managing the menopause in the context of coronary heart disease. Maturitas 68:1, 94-97
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Malgorzata Roszkowska-Gancarz, Alina Kurylowicz, Jacek Polosak, Michal Ambroziak, Monika Puzianowska-Kuznicka. (2010) The −351A/G polymorphism of ESR1 is associated with risk of myocardial infarction but not with extreme longevity. Clinica Chimica Acta 411:23-24, 1883-1887
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Cristiana Vitale, Massimo Fini, Giuseppe Speziale, Sergio Chierchia. (2010) Gender differences in the cardiovascular effects of sex hormones. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 24:6, 675-685
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Leon Speroff. (2010) Flash of insight or flush of confusion?. Menopause 17:6, 1108-1110
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Matthew A. Allison, JoAnn E. Manson, Aaron Aragaki, Robert D. Langer, Jacques Rossouw, David Curb, Lisa W. Martin, Lawrence Phillips, Marcia L. Stefanick, Barbara B. Cochrane, Gloria Sarto, Janice Barnhart, Mary Jo O'Sullivan, Karen C. Johnson, Margery Gass, Maurizio Trevisan, Nancy F. Woods. (2010) Vasomotor symptoms and coronary artery calcium in postmenopausal women. Menopause 17:6, 1136-1145
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Richard E. Hedrick, Ronald T. Ackerman, William D. Koltun, Mark B. Halvorsen. (2010) Estradiol gel 0.1% relieves vasomotor symptoms independent of age, ovarian status, or uterine status. Menopause 17:6, 1167-1173
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Cynthia A. Stuenkel. (2010) Taking steps (literally) toward a healthier heart. Menopause 17:6, 1111-1113
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Robert L. Reid. (2010) Confusion about hormone therapy: Misinterpretation of the findings of the Women's Health Initiative*. Canadian Pharmacists Journal 143:sp2, S7-S8.e1
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Andrea H. Tackett, Alison L. Bailey, Joanne Micale Foody, Julie M. Miller, Carolyn Apperson-Hansen, E. Magnus Ohman, Judith S. Hochman, Sharon L. Karnash, Robert M. Califf, Eric J. Topol, David J. Moliterno. (2010) Hormone replacement therapy among postmenopausal women presenting with acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the GUSTO-III trial. American Heart Journal 160:4, 678-684
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    (2010) Climacteric commentaries. Climacteric 13:5, 500-506
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Gyun-Ho Jeon, Sung Hoon Kim, Sung-Cheol Yun, Hee Dong Chae, Chung-Hoon Kim, Byung Moon Kang. (2010) Association between serum estradiol level and coronary artery calcification in postmenopausal women. Menopause 17:5, 902-907
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Rebecca C. Thurston. (2010) Getting to the heart of things. Menopause 17:5, 887-888
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Susan E. Appt, Kelly F. Ethun. (2010) Reproductive aging and risk for chronic disease: Insights from studies of nonhuman primates. Maturitas 67:1, 7-14
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Cahide Gokkusu, Gulten Tata, Evin Ademoğlu, Sule Tamer. (2010) The benefits of hormone replacement therapy on plasma and platelet antioxidant status and fatty acid composition in healthy postmenopausal women. Platelets 21:6, 439-444
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    VM Miller. (2010) Sex-based differences in vascular function. Women's Health 6:5, 737-752
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    J. J. Sidelmann, S. O. Skouby, F. Vitzthum, H. Schwarz, J. Jespersen. (2010) Hormone therapy affects plasma measures of factor VII-activating protease in younger postmenopausal women. Climacteric 13:4, 340-346
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    JoAnn V. Pinkerton, Dale W. Stovall. (2010) Reproductive aging, menopause, and health outcomes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1204:1, 169-178
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Ken L. Chambliss, Qian Wu, Sarah Oltmann, Eddy S. Konaniah, Michihisa Umetani, Kenneth S. Korach, Gail D. Thomas, Chieko Mineo, Ivan S. Yuhanna, Sung Hoon Kim, Zeynep Madak-Erdogan, Adriana Maggi, Sean P. Dineen, Christina L. Roland, David Y. Hui, Rolf A. Brekken, John A. Katzenellenbogen, Benita S. Katzenellenbogen, Philip W. Shaul. (2010) Non-nuclear estrogen receptor α signaling promotes cardiovascular protection but not uterine or breast cancer growth in mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation 120:7, 2319-2330
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    M.L. Stefanick. (2010) Postmenopausal hormone therapy and cardiovascular disease in women. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 20:6, 451-458
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Anca I. Corciu, Valeria Siciliano, Elisa Poggianti, Christina Petersen, Lucia Venneri, Eugenio Picano. (2010) Cardiac calcification by transthoracic echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. International Journal of Cardiology 142:3, 288-295
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    JoAnn E. Manson, Matthew A. Allison, J. Jeffrey Carr, Robert D. Langer, Barbara B. Cochrane, Susan L. Hendrix, Judith Hsia, Julie R. Hunt, Cora E. Lewis, Karen L. Margolis, Jennifer G. Robinson, Rebecca J. Rodabough, Asha M. Thomas. (2010) Calcium/vitamin D supplementation and coronary artery calcification in the Women's Health Initiative. Menopause1
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    E. Windler, A.O. Mueck, B.C. Zyriax, O. Ortmann. (2010) Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko und Hormontherapie in der Postmenopause. Der Gynäkologe 43:4, 301-307
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Thomas T Perls. (2010) Antiaging medicine: what should we tell our patients?. Aging Health 6:2, 149-154
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Ruth Clapauch, Anete S. Mecenas, Priscila A. Maranhão, Eliete Bouskela. (2010) Endothelial-mediated microcirculatory responses to an acute estradiol test are influenced by time since menopause, cumulative hormone exposure, and vasomotor symptoms. Menopause1
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Jan L. Shifren, Isaac Schiff. (2010) Role of Hormone Therapy in the Management of Menopause. Obstetrics & Gynecology 115:4, 839-855
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Eliot A. Brinton. (2010) Hot flashes and hormone use. Menopause 17:2, 223-225
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    JoAnn V. Pinkerton, Christine J. Guico-Pabia, Hugh S. Taylor. (2010) Menstrual cycle-related exacerbation of disease. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 202:3, 221-231
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Lewis H Kuller. (2010) Cardiovascular disease is preventable among women. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 8:2, 175-187
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Katey Rayner, Yong-Xiang Chen, Tara Siebert, Edward R. O'Brien. (2010) Heat Shock Protein 27: Clue to Understanding Estrogen-Mediated Atheroprotection?. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 20:2, 53-57
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Peter C. Austin, Andrea Manca, Merrick Zwarenstein, David N. Juurlink, Matthew B. Stanbrook. (2010) A substantial and confusing variation exists in handling of baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials: a review of trials published in leading medical journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63:2, 142-153
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Tomohiro Nakamura, Manabu Ogita, Junya Ako, Shin-ichi Momomura. (2010) Gender Differences of Plaque Characteristics in Elderly Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: An Intravascular Ultrasonic Radiofrequency Data Analysis. International Journal of Vascular Medicine 2010, 1-5
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Nina Carroll. (2010) A Review of Transdermal Nonpatch Estrogen Therapy for the Management of Menopausal Symptoms. Journal of Women's Health 19:1, 47-55
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Sandra M. Sacco, Wendy E. Ward. (2010) Revisiting Estrogen: Efficacy and Safety for Postmenopausal Bone Health. Journal of Osteoporosis 2010, 1-8
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Chirapa Puntawangkoon, Tim M. Morgan, David M. Herrington, Craig A. Hamilton, W. Gregory Hundley. (2010) Submaximal exercise coronary artery flow increases in postmenopausal women without coronary artery disease after estrogen and atorvastatin. Menopause 17:1, 114-120
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    John C. Stevenson, Howard N. Hodis, James H. Pickar, Rogerio A. Lobo. (2009) Coronary heart disease and menopause management: The swinging pendulum of HRT. Atherosclerosis 207:2, 336-340
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Wolfgang Junge, Volker El-Samalouti, Christoph Gerlinger, Matthias Schaefers. (2009) Effects of menopausal hormone therapy on hemostatic parameters, blood pressure, and body weight: Open-label comparison of randomized treatment with estradiol plus drospirenone versus estradiol plus norethisterone acetate. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 147:2, 195-200
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Vera Bittner. (2009) Menopause, Age, and Cardiovascular Risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 54:25, 2374-2375
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Susan Hong, Aarati Didwania, Olufunmilayo Olopade, Pamela Ganschow. (2009) The Expanding Use of Third-Generation Aromatase Inhibitors: What the General Internist Needs to Know. Journal of General Internal Medicine 24:S2, 383-388
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Stefan M. Gold, Rhonda R. Voskuhl. (2009) Estrogen treatment in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 286:1-2, 99-103
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    V. M. Miller, D. M. Black, E. A. Brinton, M. J. Budoff, M. I. Cedars, H. N. Hodis, R. A. Lobo, J. E. Manson, G. R. Merriam, F. Naftolin, N. Santoro, H. S. Taylor, S. M. Harman. (2009) Using Basic Science to Design a Clinical Trial: Baseline Characteristics of Women Enrolled in the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS). Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research 2:3, 228-239
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Cristiana Vitale, Michael E. Mendelsohn, Giuseppe M. C. Rosano. (2009) Gender differences in the cardiovascular effect of sex hormones. Nature Reviews Cardiology 6:8, 532-542
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    Olga Lekontseva, Yanyan Jiang, Sandra T Davidge. (2009) Estrogen replacement increases matrix metalloproteinase contribution to vasoconstriction in a rat model of menopause. Journal of Hypertension 27:8, 1602-1608
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Luca Mascitelli, Mark R Goldstein, Francesca Pezzetta. (2009) Questioning the cardioprotective action of hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 10:8, 657-658
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    (2009) Chapter 4.1: Treatment of CKD–MBD targeted at lowering high serum phosphorus and maintaining serum calcium. Kidney International 76, S50-S99
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    James W. Simpkins, Kun Don Yi, Shao-Hua Yang. (2009) Role of protein phosphatases and mitochondria in the neuroprotective effects of estrogens. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 30:2, 93-105
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    R. L. Prentice, J. E. Manson, R. D. Langer, G. L. Anderson, M. Pettinger, R. D. Jackson, K. C. Johnson, L. H. Kuller, D. S. Lane, J. Wactawski-Wende, R. Brzyski, M. Allison, J. Ockene, G. Sarto, J. E. Rossouw. (2009) Benefits and Risks of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy When It Is Initiated Soon After Menopause. American Journal of Epidemiology 170:1, 12-23
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Matthew A. Allison, JoAnn E. Manson. (2009) The complex interplay of vasomotor symptoms, hormone therapy, and cardiovascular risk. Menopause 16:4, 619-620
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Serena Donati, Rodolfo Cotichini, Paola Mosconi, Roberto Satolli, Cinzia Colombo, Alessandro Liberati, e Alfonso Mele. (2009) Menopause: Knowledge, attitude and practice among Italian women. Maturitas 63:3, 246-252
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    JoAnn V Pinkerton, Dale W Stovall, Rebecca S Kightlinger. (2009) Advances in the treatment of menopausal symptoms. Women's Health 5:4, 361-384
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    Alastair H MacLennan. (2009) Evidence-based review of therapies at the menopause. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 7:2, 112-123
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Lauren E. Cain, Stephen R. Cole. (2009) Inverse probability-of-censoring weights for the correction of time-varying noncompliance in the effect of randomized highly active antiretroviral therapy on incident AIDS or death. Statistics in Medicine 28:12, 1725-1738
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    JoAnn V. Pinkerton, Robert A. Wild. (2009) The need for evidence-based medicine to be integrated into clinical practice. Menopause 16:3, 438-441
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Marco Stramba-Badiale. (2009) Postmenopausal hormone therapy and the risk of cardiovascular disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 10:4, 303-309
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    Robert Flaumenhaft, Margaret Nachtigall, Joanna Lowenstein, Lisa Nachtigall, Richard Nachtigall, Lila Nachtigall. (2009) Association of oral but not transdermal estrogen therapy with enhanced platelet reactivity in a subset of postmenopausal women. Menopause 16:2, 407-412
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    Sally A. Huston, Rebekah M. Jackowski, Duane M. Kirking. (2009) Women's Trust in and Use of Information Sources in the Treatment of Menopausal Symptoms. Women's Health Issues 19:2, 144-153
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    Walter H. Moos, James A. Dykens, Dana Nohynek, Evelina Rubinchik, Neil Howell. (2009) Review of the effects of 17α-estradiol in humans: a less feminizing estrogen with neuroprotective potential. Drug Development Research 70:1, 1-21
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    John C. Stevenson. (2009) HRT and cardiovascular disease. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 23:1, 109-120
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    T. R. Rebbeck, N. D. Kauff, S. M. Domchek. (2009) Meta-analysis of Risk Reduction Estimates Associated With Risk-Reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 101:2, 80-87
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    James P Stice, Jennifer S Lee, Angela S Pechenino, Anne A Knowlton. (2009) Estrogen, aging and the cardiovascular system. Future Cardiology 5:1, 93-103
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Giuseppe MC Rosano, Silvia Maffei, Maria G Andreassi, Cristiana Vitale, Cristina Vassalle, Marco Gambacciani, Marco Stramba-Badiale, Giuseppe Mercuro. (2009) Hormone replacement therapy and cardioprotection: a new dawn? A statement of the Study Group on Cardiovascular Disease in Women of the Italian Society of Cardiology on hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 10:1, 85-92
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    Cathleen M. Rivera, Brandon R. Grossardt, Deborah J. Rhodes, Robert D. Brown, Véronique L. Roger, L. Joseph Melton, Walter A. Rocca. (2009) Increased cardiovascular mortality after early bilateral oophorectomy. Menopause 16:1, 15-23
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Shelley R. Salpeter, Nicholas S. Buckley, Hau Liu, Edwin E. Salpeter. (2009) The Cost-effectiveness of Hormone Therapy in Younger and Older Postmenopausal Women. The American Journal of Medicine 122:1, 42-52.e2
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    Rogerio A. Lobo. 2009. Menopause and Aging. , 325-355.
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    Ellen W. Seely, Steven Grinspoon. 2009. Patient-Oriented ResearchClinical Pathophysiology and Clinical Therapeutics. , 3-12.
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    Matthijs Oudkerk, Arthur E. Stillman, Sandra S. Halliburton, Willi A. Kalender, Stefan Möhlenkamp, Cynthia H. McCollough, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Leslee J. Shaw, William Stanford, Allen J. Taylor, Peter M. A. Ooijen, Lewis Wexler, Paolo Raggi. (2008) Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. European Radiology 18:12, 2785-2807
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    Joseph Yeboah, Karen Klein, Bridget Brosnihan, David Reboussin, David M. Herrington. (2008) Effects of hormone therapy on soluble cell adhesion molecules in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease. Menopause 15:6, 1060-1064
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    J. A. Hyder, M. A. Allison, N. Wong, A. Papa, T. F. Lang, C. Sirlin, S. M. Gapstur, P. Ouyang, J. J. Carr, M. H. Criqui. (2008) Association of Coronary Artery and Aortic Calcium With Lumbar Bone Density: The MESA Abdominal Aortic Calcium Study. American Journal of Epidemiology 169:2, 186-194
    CrossRef

  107. 107

    Brian G. Choi, Gemma Vilahur, M. Urooj Zafar, Luis Cardoso, Daniel Yadegar, Borja Ibanez, James Tunstead, Juan F. Viles-Gonzalez, Mitchell B. Schaffler, Valentin Fuster, Juan J. Badimon. (2008) Selective estrogen receptor modulation influences atherosclerotic plaque composition in a rabbit menopause model. Atherosclerosis 201:1, 76-84
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    Patricia H. Davis. (2008) Use of oral contraceptives and postmenopausal hormone replacement: Evidence on risk of stroke. Current Treatment Options in Neurology 10:6, 468-474
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    C. Banz, K. Schaudig, A. Schwenkhagen, K. Diedrich. (2008) Kardiovaskuläres Risiko in der Postmenopause und Hormonersatztherapie. Der Gynäkologe 41:11, 879-883
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    (2008) Estrogen and progestogen therapy in postmenopausal women. Fertility and Sterility 90:5, S88-S102
    CrossRef

  111. 111

    J. F. Farley, S. J. Blalock, R. R. Cline. (2008) Effect of the women’s health initiative on prescription anti-osteoporosis medication utilization. Osteoporosis International 19:11, 1603-1612
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    A. Gompel, S. Rozenberg, D.H. Barlow. (2008) The EMAS 2008 update on clinical recommendations on postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas 61:3, 227-232
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    Elisabetta Vegeto, Valeria Benedusi, Adriana Maggi. (2008) Estrogen anti-inflammatory activity in brain: A therapeutic opportunity for menopause and neurodegenerative diseases. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 29:4, 507-519
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    Femke Atsma, Marie-Louise E.L. Bartelink, Diederick E. Grobbee, Annemarieke Rutten, Michiel L. Bots, Matthias Prokop, Yvonne T. van der Schouw. (2008) Reproductive factors, metabolic factors, and coronary artery calcification in older women. Menopause 15:5, 899-904
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    G. Jackson. (2008) Preventing coronary heart disease in women. International Journal of Clinical Practice 62:9, 1299-1300
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    Noha A. Mousa, Pavel Crystal, Wendy L. Wolfman, Mohamed A. Bedaiwy, Robert F. Casper. (2008) Aromatase inhibitors and mammographic breast density in postmenopausal women receiving hormone therapy. Menopause 15:5, 875-884
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    STANLEY J. BIRGE. (2008) Hormone Therapy and Stroke. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 51:3, 581-591
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    Marcia Gene Ko. (2008) New thoughts about estrogen therapy from the Women’s Health Initiative. Current Osteoporosis Reports 6:3, 108-113
    CrossRef

  119. 119

    NANETTE SANTORO. (2008) Symptoms of Menopause: Hot Flushes. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 51:3, 539-548
    CrossRef

  120. 120

    Kirsten J. Lund. (2008) Menopause and the Menopausal Transition. Medical Clinics of North America 92:5, 1253-1271
    CrossRef

  121. 121

    Eliot A. Brinton, Howard N. Hodis, George R. Merriam, S. Mitchell Harman, Frederick Naftolin. (2008) Can menopausal hormone therapy prevent coronary heart disease?. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 19:6, 206-212
    CrossRef

  122. 122

    Michelle L. Frost, Rodolpho Grella, Sandrine C. Millasseau, Ben-yu Jiang, Geeta Hampson, Ignac Fogelman, Phil J. Chowienczyk. (2008) Relationship of Calcification of Atherosclerotic Plaque and Arterial Stiffness to Bone Mineral Density and Osteoprotegerin in Postmenopausal Women Referred for Osteoporosis Screening. Calcified Tissue International 83:2, 112-120
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    Matthijs Oudkerk, Arthur E. Stillman, Sandra S. Halliburton, Willi A. Kalender, Stefan Möhlenkamp, Cynthia H. McCollough, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Leslee J. Shaw, William Stanford, Allen J. Taylor, Peter M. A. Ooijen, Lewis Wexler, Paolo Raggi. (2008) Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 24:6, 645-671
    CrossRef

  124. 124

    Richard L. Tannen, Mark G. Weiner, Dawei Xie, Kurt Barnhart. (2008) Perspectives on hormone replacement therapy: the Women's Health Initiative and new observational studies sampling the overall population. Fertility and Sterility 90:2, 258-264
    CrossRef

  125. 125

    Paula S. Derry. (2008) Update on Hormones, Menopause, and Heart Disease: Evaluating Professional Responses to the Women's Health Initiative. Health Care for Women International 29:7, 720-737
    CrossRef

  126. 126

    Marc L’Hermite, Tommaso Simoncini, Sarah Fuller, Andrea Riccardo Genazzani. (2008) Could transdermal estradiol+progesterone be a safer postmenopausal HRT? A review. Maturitas 60:3-4, 185-201
    CrossRef

  127. 127

    Matthew A. Allison, JoAnn E. Manson, Robert D. Langer, J. Jeffrey Carr, Jacques E. Rossouw, Mary B. Pettinger, Lawrence Phillips, Barbara B. Cochrane, Charles B. Eaton, Philip Greenland, Susan Hendrix, Judith Hsia, Julie R. Hunt, Rebecca D. Jackson, Karen C. Johnson, Lewis H. Kuller, Jennifer Robinson. (2008) Oophorectomy, hormone therapy, and subclinical coronary artery disease in women with hysterectomy. Menopause 15:4, 639-647
    CrossRef

  128. 128

    Jay R. Kaplan, Stephen B. Manuck. (2008) Ovarian dysfunction and the premenopausal origins of coronary heart disease. Menopause 15:4, 768-776
    CrossRef

  129. 129

    R Kent Hermsmeyer, Theresa L Thompson, Gerald M Pohost, Juan Carlos Kaski. (2008) Cardiovascular effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate and progesterone: a case of mistaken identity?. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine 5:7, 387-395
    CrossRef

  130. 130

    Eyal Shahar, Gregory L. Burke, Mary Cushman, Susan R. Heckbert, Pamela Ouyang, Moyses Szklo. (2008) Post menopausal hormones and measures of subclinical atherosclerosis: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Preventive Medicine 47:1, 38-45
    CrossRef

  131. 131

    U. Gaspard. (2008) Prévention des troubles coronaires par le traitement hormonal précoce à la ménopause : une idée qui s’impose à nouveau. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 37:4, 340-345
    CrossRef

  132. 132

    Odd Erik Johansen, Erik Qvigstad. (2008) Rationale for low-dose systemic hormone replacement therapy and review of estradiol 0.5 mg/NETA 0.1 mg. Advances in Therapy 25:6, 525-551
    CrossRef

  133. 133

    D L Andress. (2008) Adynamic bone in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney International 73:12, 1345-1354
    CrossRef

  134. 134

    Rachel P. Wildman, Alicia B. Colvin, Lynda H. Powell, Karen A. Matthews, Susan A. Everson-Rose, Steven Hollenberg, Janet M. Johnston, Kim Sutton-Tyrrell. (2008) Associations of endogenous sex hormones with the vasculature in menopausal women. Menopause 15:3, 414-421
    CrossRef

  135. 135

    G. Emons. (2008) Hormontherapie mit Östrogenen und Gestagenen in der Peri- und Postmenopause. Der Internist 49:5, 553-558
    CrossRef

  136. 136

    Jodi R. Godfrey, Tieraona Low Dog. (2008) Toward Optimal Health: Menopause as a Rite of Passage. Journal of Women's Health 17:4, 509-514
    CrossRef

  137. 137

    P.H.M. van de Weijer. (2008) Risks of hormone therapy in the 50–59 year age group. Maturitas 60:1, 59-64
    CrossRef

  138. 138

    Rachel Hess, Alicia Colvin, Nancy E. Avis, Joyce T. Bromberger, Miriam Schocken, Janet M. Johnston, Karen A. Matthews. (2008) The impact of hormone therapy on health-related quality of life. Menopause 15:3, 422-428
    CrossRef

  139. 139

    Corrine K. Welt. (2008) Primary ovarian insufficiency: a more accurate term for premature ovarian failure. Clinical Endocrinology 68:4, 499-509
    CrossRef

  140. 140

    David H. Barlow. (2008) The Medical Management of Menopause. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1127:1, 134-139
    CrossRef

  141. 141

    Richard E Hedrick. (2008) Low-dose estradiol gel 0.1% for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology 3:2, 155-162
    CrossRef

  142. 142

    Rosemary Theroux. (2008) Postmenopausal Hormone Use: What Does the Latest Evidence Show?. Nursing for Women's Health 12:1, 56-61
    CrossRef

  143. 143

    Cheryl D Bushnell. (2008) Stroke and the female brain. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology 4:1, 22-33
    CrossRef

  144. 144

    Régine Sitruk-Ware. (2008) Does estrogen therapy reduce coronary artery calcification in postmenopausal women?. Nature Clinical Practice Endocrinology &#38; Metabolism 4:1, 12-13
    CrossRef

  145. 145

    Barbara B. Sherwin, Jessica F. Henry. (2008) Brain aging modulates the neuroprotective effects of estrogen on selective aspects of cognition in women: A critical review. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 29:1, 88-113
    CrossRef

  146. 146

    J. Jeffrey Carr, Thomas C. Register, Fang-Chi Hsu, Kurt Lohman, Leon Lenchik, Donald W. Bowden, Carl D. Langefeld, Jianzhou Xu, Stephen S. Rich, Lynne E. Wagenknecht, Barry I. Freedman. (2008) Calcified atherosclerotic plaque and bone mineral density in type 2 diabetes: The diabetes heart study. Bone 42:1, 43-52
    CrossRef

  147. 147

    James W. Simpkins, Meharvan Singh. (2008) More than a decade of estrogen neuroprotection. Alzheimer's and Dementia 4:1, S131-S136
    CrossRef

  148. 148

    John C Stevenson. (2007) Does estrogen therapy reduce coronary artery calcification in postmenopausal women?. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine 4:12, 654-655
    CrossRef

  149. 149

    James A Simon, Michael C Snabes. (2007) Menopausal hormone therapy for vasomotor symptoms: balancing the risks and benefits with ultra-low doses of estrogen. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 16:12, 2005-2020
    CrossRef

  150. 150

    Stanley J. Birge. (2007) Aromatase inhibitors. Menopause 14:6, 971-972
    CrossRef

  151. 151

    Thomas B. Clarkson, Richard H. Karas. (2007) Do the cardiovascular disease risks and benefits of oral versus transdermal estrogen therapy differ between perimenopausal and postmenopausal women?. Menopause 14:6, 963-967
    CrossRef

  152. 152

    Liqin Zhao, Roberta Diaz Brinton. (2007) WHI and WHIMS follow-up and human studies of soy isoflavones on cognition. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 7:11, 1549-1564
    CrossRef

  153. 153

    (2007) Estrogen Therapy and Coronary-Artery Calcification. New England Journal of Medicine 357:12, 1252-1254
    Full Text

  154. 154

    Peter Alexandersen, Morten A Karsdal, Claus Christiansen. (2007) Hormone replacement as the first-line prevention for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2:5, 689-700
    CrossRef

  155. 155

    Wulf H. Utian. (2007) NIH and WHI-time for a mea culpa and steps beyond*. Menopause 14:6, 1056-1059
    CrossRef

  156. 156

    A.O. Mueck, H. Seeger. (2007) Kardiovaskuläre Risiken unter HRT in der Postmenopause. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 5:3, 120-126
    CrossRef

  157. 157

    Serge Ferrari, Ego Seeman, Gordon J Strewler. (2007) Clinical and basic research papers – July 2007 selections. BoneKEy-Osteovision 4:8, 204-208
    CrossRef

  158. 158

    Mendelsohn, Michael E., Karas, Richard H., . (2007) HRT and the Young at Heart. New England Journal of Medicine 356:25, 2639-2641
    Full Text

  159. 159

    Ki Ok Han. (2007) Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy Up-to-date. Journal of Korean Endocrine Society 22:5, 317
    CrossRef

  160. 160

    Fabrizio Montecucco, Sabine Steffens, François Mach. (2007) The Immune Response Is Involved in Atherosclerotic Plaque Calcification: Could the RANKL/RANK/OPG System Be a Marker of Plaque Instability?. Clinical and Developmental Immunology 2007, 1-8
    CrossRef

Letters