Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

HER2 and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Kathleen I. Pritchard, M.D., Lois E. Shepherd, M.D., Frances P. O'Malley, M.D., Irene L. Andrulis, Ph.D., Dongsheng Tu, Ph.D., Vivien H. Bramwell, M.B., B.S., and Mark N. Levine, M.D. for the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2103-2111May 18, 2006

Abstract

Background

Amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2, also called HER2/neu) gene and overexpression of its product in breast-cancer cells may be associated with responsiveness to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens.

Methods

In the randomized, controlled Mammary.5 trial, we studied 639 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens obtained from 710 premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer who had received either cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy. HER2 amplification or overexpression was evaluated with the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemical analysis, and polymerase-chain-reaction analysis.

Results

Amplification of HER2 was associated with a poor prognosis regardless of the type of treatment. In patients whose tumors showed amplification of HER2, CEF was superior to CMF when assessed on the basis of relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.80; P=0.003) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.42 to 1.02; P=0.06). For women whose tumors lacked amplification of HER2, CEF did not improve relapse-free survival (hazard ratio for relapse, 0.91; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 1.18; P=0.49) or overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.06; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.44; P=0.68). The adjusted hazard ratio for the interaction between treatment and HER2 amplification was 1.96 for relapse-free survival (95 percent confidence interval, 1.15 to 3.36; P=0.01) and 2.04 for overall survival (95 percent confidence interval, 1.14 to 3.65; P=0.02).

Conclusions

Amplification of HER2 in breast-cancer cells is associated with clinical responsiveness to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. (cancer.gov number, NCI-V90-0027.)

Media in This Article

Figure 1Relapse-free Survival (Panel A) and Overall Survival (Panel B) among Women with Breast Cancer, According to HER2 Amplification Status on FISH.
Figure 2Relapse-free Survival (Panel A) and Overall Survival (Panel B) According to the Type of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2 Amplification on FISH.
Article

In the 1980s, trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer that compared regimens containing an anthracycline (epirubicin or doxorubicin) with a combination of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) yielded inconsistent results.1-3 More than a decade later, the safety and efficacy of an intensive regimen of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer were demonstrated.4 In the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) Mammary.5 (MA.5) randomized trial involving premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer, CEF was shown to be superior to CMF5 and remained superior in terms of relapse-free survival and overall survival after a median follow-up of 10 years.6 As compared with CMF, however, CEF was associated with increased rates of alopecia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and neutropenia and febrile neutropenia; a temporary reduction in the quality of life; and an increase in the risk of congestive heart failure (1.1 percent) and acute leukemia (1.4 percent).5,6 Treatment with CEF is also considerably more expensive than CMF therapy.

It has been suggested that amplification of the gene for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2, also referred to as HER2/neu), overexpression of its product, or both in breast-cancer cells not only predicts responsiveness to trastuzumab7,8 but also identifies patients whose tumors will not respond to CMF9-13 and who could benefit from high-dose chemotherapy14-19 or from anthracycline-containing regimens.20-29 To pursue this suggestion, we studied formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from all patients enrolled in the MA.5 trial to determine whether amplification of HER2, overexpression of HER2, or both in breast-cancer cells identifies women who could benefit from CEF, as compared with CMF.

Methods

Patients

We conducted a study involving premenopausal women, described previously,5,6 with histologically confirmed axillary-node–positive breast cancer who had undergone a modified radical mastectomy or lumpectomy plus axillary dissection. The MA.5 trial protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each participating center, and written informed consent was obtained from each woman before randomization.

Treatment Regimens

As described previously,5,6 the CMF regimen consisted of six cycles of oral cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Bristol-Myers Squibb) at a dose of 100 mg per square meter of body-surface area on days 1 through 14, 40 mg of methotrexate (Wyeth [formerly Lederle]) per square meter intravenously on days 1 and 8, and 600 mg of fluorouracil (Efudex, Valeant Pharm) per square meter intravenously on days 1 and 8. The CEF regimen consisted of six cycles of oral cyclophosphamide at a dose of 75 mg per square meter on days 1 through 14, 60 mg of epirubicin (Pharmorubicin, Pfizer) per square meter intravenously on days 1 and 8, and 500 mg of fluorouracil per square meter intravenously on days 1 and 8. During CEF therapy, the women also received antibiotic prophylaxis with trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (Septra, Glaxo Wellcome) at a dose of two tablets orally twice daily or, for those who could not tolerate trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, norfloxacin (Norflox, Merck) at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily or ciprofloxacin (Cipro, Bayer) at a dose of 500 mg orally twice daily. Endocrine therapy was not to be used after the completion of chemotherapy.

Outcomes

The primary outcomes for the MA.5 study were relapse-free survival and overall survival. They have been defined previously.5,6

Specimen Collection

As part of supporting documentation for the MA.5 trial, the NCIC CTG collected diagnostic pathology reports for each woman. For the current analysis, pathologists were asked to submit a representative formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded block of tumor tissue from each woman, or if tumor blocks were unavailable, 20 4-μm unstained sections, to the central office of the NCIC CTG. Paraffin blocks were stored at room temperature, and unstained sections were kept at 4°C. Samples were identified only by an identification number assigned to each patient at randomization. A stained section of each tumor sample was prepared from blocks or slides to confirm the diagnosis and identify representative tumor areas for microdissection and DNA extraction for analysis by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). An adjacent 10-μm section was also obtained for PCR analysis. Further 4-μm sections were obtained for immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Assay results were reported to the NCIC CTG central office, where the statistical analysis was performed.

Measurement of HER2 Expression

Expression of the HER2 protein was measured by immunohistochemical analysis with the CB11 antibody (Novocastra) and the TAB 250 antibody (Zymed), as previously described.30 Only complete membrane staining of invasive tumor cells was considered in the results. The proportion of cells with complete membrane staining was assessed with the use of the Allred semiquantitative scoring system.31 A score of five or greater on the immunohistochemical analysis was considered to be positive for overexpression of the HER2 protein on the basis of previous technical validation of this cutoff point.30

FISH

Representative sections of tumor were hybridized with the use of a HER-2 DNA probe kit (PathVysion, Vysis), as previously described.32 A staining-intensity ratio of HER2 to chromosome 17 (assessed with the use of the centromere enumeration probe cep 17) of 2 or more was considered to indicate amplification, in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.

PCR

PCR analysis for amplification of HER2 was performed as described by O'Malley et al.30 A relative increase in the number of gene copies of two or more was considered to indicate amplification.

Statistical Analysis

Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival according to the presence or absence of amplification of HER2 or overexpression of HER2 or according to the treatment regimen were compared with the use of a log-rank test. We use the phrase “amplification of HER2” throughout to refer to the results of FISH and PCR and the term “overexpression” to refer to the results of the immunohistochemical analysis. We used the Cox proportional-hazards model with a single covariate to obtain the hazard ratios for relapse or death and associated 95 percent confidence intervals for the comparison between the two groups. We used the Cox model, with treatment, amplification status, and their interaction as covariates, to assess the interaction between treatment and amplification status. Multivariable analyses were performed with the use of the Cox model and were adjusted for age (≥50 years vs. <50 years), number of positive lymph nodes (<3 vs. ≥4), estrogen-receptor level (≥10 vs. <10 fmol per milligram), type of surgery (total vs. partial mastectomy), and tumor size (T1, T2, or T3, according to the tumor–node–metastasis staging system). The kappa statistic and associated 95 percent confidence intervals were used to measure agreement among the four assays of HER2 (with a value >0.80 indicating near-perfect agreement, values of 0.61 to 0.80 substantial agreement, values of 0.41 to 0.60 moderate agreement, values of 0.21 to 0.40 fair agreement, values >0 to 0.20 slight agreement, and values of 0 no agreement or a random association).33

Drs. Shepherd and Tu, of the NCIC CTG central office, were responsible for study coordination, collection and management of the data, statistical analyses, and administrative activities. Most of the study funding was provided by the NCIC, the Canadian Cancer Society, and the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance. Pharmacia (now Pfizer) provided epirubicin, and Vysis provided FISH kits at a reduced price.

Results

The outcome data reported here are based on the data set from the MA.5 trial, which was updated on April 5, 2002,34 and published in 2005.6 All women who were alive were followed for a minimum of 9 years and a median of 10 years. Among the 710 women in the study, 363 had a recurrence of breast cancer and 284 died.

Tissue samples were available from 639 of 710 eligible women (90 percent) in the MA.5 trial. Immunohistochemical analysis with the use of the CB11 antibody was successful in 634 tumor samples (89 percent), immunohistochemical analysis with the use of the TAB 250 antibody was successful in 632 samples (89 percent), and the results of FISH were interpretable for 628 samples (89 percent). Amplification of HER2 was assayed by PCR in 624 tumors (88 percent). On FISH, 163 of 628 tumors were found to have HER2 amplification (26 percent). On immunohistochemical analysis, overexpression of the HER2 protein was found in 124 of 634 tumors analyzed with the CB11 antibody (20 percent) and in 116 of 632 tumors analyzed with the TAB 250 antibody (18 percent). PCR analysis detected amplification of HER2/neu in 195 of 624 tumors (31 percent).

Results with the two antibodies, CB11 and TAB 250, were in substantial agreement (kappa statistic, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.75 to 0.86) (Table 1Table 1Results of Assays of HER2 Amplification on FISH and PCR and HER2 Overexpression on Immunohistochemical Analysis with the TAB 250 and CB11 Antibodies.). There was also substantial agreement between the results of FISH and those of the immunohistochemical analyses with the CB11 antibody (kappa statistic, 0.76; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.82) and the TAB 250 antibody (kappa statistic, 0.66; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.73) and between FISH and the PCR analysis (kappa statistic, 0.60; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.67) (Table 1). Kappa statistics for other analyses showed moderate agreement (Table 1).

Associations between the results of analyses of amplification or overexpression of HER2 and relapse-free survival and overall survival were assessed with each of the four assay methods. The results of FISH are presented in detail, because this method is the gold standard for measurement of HER2 status.35,36 Table 2Table 2Baseline Characteristics of Women for Whom FISH Data Were Available. shows the baseline characteristics of the patients for whom FISH-based measurements were available. The distribution of the characteristics in this subgroup was similar to that among all 710 eligible patients who underwent randomization in the MA.5 study.6 There was no significant difference between women with HER2 amplification and those without amplification, except for a shift toward younger age among those whose tumors exhibited HER2 amplification on FISH.

As compared with women without HER2 amplification, women with HER2 amplification had a decreased likelihood of both relapse-free survival (hazard ratio for relapse, 1.31; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.67; P=0.03) and overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.62; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.24 to 2.11; P<0.001) (Figure 1Figure 1Relapse-free Survival (Panel A) and Overall Survival (Panel B) among Women with Breast Cancer, According to HER2 Amplification Status on FISH.). After adjustment for age, nodal status, estrogen-receptor status, type of surgery, and tumor size, the likelihood of relapse-free survival remained lower among women with HER2 amplification than among women without HER2 amplification (hazard ratio for relapse, 1.24; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.60; P=0.09), as did the likelihood of overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.53; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.15 to 2.02; P=0.003).

Among the women whose tumors showed HER2 amplification, adjuvant chemotherapy with CEF was superior to that with CMF in terms of both relapse-free survival (hazard ratio for relapse, 0.52; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.80; P=0.003) and overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.42 to 1.02; P=0.06) (Figure 2Figure 2Relapse-free Survival (Panel A) and Overall Survival (Panel B) According to the Type of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2 Amplification on FISH.). By contrast, among those whose tumors did not show amplification of HER2, there was no significant difference between adjuvant chemotherapy with CEF and that with CMF in terms of relapse-free survival (hazard ratio for relapse, 0.91; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 1.18; P=0.49) or overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 1.06; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.44; P=0.68) (Figure 3Figure 3Relapse-free Survival (Panel A) and Overall Survival (Panel B) According to Type of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women without HER2 Amplification on FISH.). Unadjusted hazard ratios for the interaction between treatment and amplification status were 1.79 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 2.96; P=0.02) for relapse-free survival and 1.66 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.97 to 2.85; P=0.07) for overall survival. The hazard ratio for the interaction between treatment and amplification status, after adjustment for age, nodal status, estrogen-receptor levels, type of surgery, and tumor size, was 1.96 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.15 to 3.36; P=0.01) for relapse-free survival and 2.04 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.14 to 3.65; P=0.02) for overall survival.

Similar analyses were performed with the amplification of HER2 obtained by PCR analysis and measurements of the overexpression of HER2 performed by immunohistochemical analysis with CB11 and TAB 250 antibodies. For each of these methods, the adjusted hazard ratio for the interaction between treatment and amplification status was significant for relapse-free survival. Adjusted hazard ratios for the interaction reached significance for overall survival in the FISH analysis and in the immunohistochemical analysis with the use of the CB11 antibody but not with the use of the TAB 250 antibody or in the PCR analysis (Table 3Table 3Hazard Ratios for Interaction between Treatments and Amplification of HER2 or Overexpression of HER2.).

Discussion

Previous analyses have suggested that women with node-positive breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy with CEF, as compared with CMF, have an increase in relapse-free survival of approximately 30 percent and in overall survival of 18 percent.5,6 Our correlative analysis indicated that the increase in benefit attributable to CEF is confined almost completely to women whose tumors exhibit amplification or overexpression of HER2.

Other investigators have examined the effect of HER2 amplification or overexpression on outcome in trials comparing regimens that contained an anthracycline with those that did not contain an anthracycline.20-29,37 Although most of these trials suggested a trend toward greater benefit with the anthracycline-containing regimen in women whose tumors overexpress HER2 or amplify HER2, tests for interaction were significant in only one study, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-11 trial,22 in which a regimen of melphalan and fluorouracil was compared with a regimen of melphalan, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil. In that trial, more than 90 percent of the tumors were tested for HER2 status, whereas in the other studies, tumor specimens were evaluated in no more than 60 percent of the patients.20,21,23-29 Most of these other studies lacked the statistical power to detect predictive interactions, unless the interactions were extremely strong.

Pegram et al.38 investigated whether HER2 overexpression or HER2 amplification conferred a sensitivity to doxorubicin in four breast-cancer cell lines that were transfected with the HER2 gene and then exposed to doxorubicin. No alteration in chemosensitivity was observed in any of the lines. An in vitro study of breast-cancer cells obtained from 140 patients who had not undergone chemotherapy showed no association between HER2 overexpression or HER2 amplification and resistance to CMF or fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide and no preferential benefit of the latter regimen in tumors positive for HER2.39 These findings argue against a direct role of HER2 amplification or HER2 overexpression in the sensitivity of breast cancer to anthracyclines.

The association between HER2 overexpression and HER2 amplification and sensitivity to anthracycline may be related to topoisomerase IIα. There is evidence40 that amplification of the topoisomerase IIα gene (TOP2A) is associated with sensitivity of metastatic breast cancer to anthracyclines. Anthracyclines are topoisomerase inhibitors, and TOP2A is close to the HER2 gene on chromosome 17. Jarvinen et al.41 have shown, however, that HER2 and TOP2A are not on the same amplicon and that when HER2 is amplified, TOP2A is deleted as often as it is amplified. Nevertheless, changes in topoisomerase IIα, at the level of the gene or the protein, may increase sensitivity to anthracyclines, suggesting that measurement of topoisomerase IIα in the tumor could be useful in selecting treatment for a woman with breast cancer. A number of groups are exploring this hypothesis.42 Three recent reports of randomized trials have suggested that deletion or amplification of TOP2A is indicative of a poor outcome and predictive of a greater differential response to anthracycline-containing regimens.37,43,44 In two of the three studies, all tumors had amplified HER2, 43,44 but in the other trial comparing CMF and CEF, which was very similar to the MA.5 trial, HER2 was not predictive of a differential response to CEF even in a univariate analysis, whereas deletion or amplification of TOP2A seemed to be predictive of a differential response.37

We believe that our analysis of the association between HER2 amplification or overexpression and responsiveness to CEF, as compared with CMF, is particularly robust, for several reasons. We proposed this analysis before we began collecting tumor specimens; our a priori hypothesis was that women whose tumors exhibited amplification or overexpression of HER2 would benefit more from CEF than from CMF. We were able to collect tumor specimens from 90 percent of the eligible patients and to measure HER2 amplification or overexpression of the HER2 protein with the use of all four of the proposed methods in 88 percent or more of the tumor samples obtained from these patients.

In conclusion, whether it plays a direct or indirect role, HER2 amplification or overexpression in breast cancer is associated with a larger benefit from CEF than from CMF. Patients whose tumors do not amplify or overexpress HER2 receive virtually no benefit from CEF, as compared with CMF. These data suggest that patients whose tumors do not exhibit amplification or overexpression of HER2 could be treated with the less toxic regimen of CMF, whereas those with tumors that show amplified HER2 or overexpressed HER2 should receive dose-intensive anthracycline-containing regimens such as CEF.

Presented as a preliminary analysis at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, Fla., May 18–21, 2002.

Supported by grants from the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (10032, to Dr. Pritchard) and the Canadian Cancer Society (015469, through the National Cancer Institute of Canada).

Dr. Pritchard reports having received consulting fees and speaking fees from Pharmacia (Pfizer). No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

We are indebted to Rosemary Mueller, director of the Cytogenetics Laboratory, Capital Health, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton; to Eleanor Latta, M.D., for assistance with FISH and immunohistochemical readings for all specimens; to Tania Molinaro and Suzanna Tjan for technical assistance; to Elizabeth Ramage and Charlene Wainwright for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript; to Vysis for providing FISH kits at a reduced price; and to Pfizer for providing epirubicin.

Source Information

From the Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto (K.I.P.); Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (L.E.S., D.T.); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto (F.P.O., I.L.A.); the Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, University of Toronto, and the Fred A. Litwin Centre for Cancer Genetics, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto (I.L.A.); the Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, and Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alta. (V.H.B.); and the Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (M.N.L.) — all in Canada.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Pritchard at Clinical Trials and Epidemiology, Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    Fisher B, Brown AM, Dimitrov NV, et al. Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:1483-1496
    Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Moliterni A, Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Ferrari L, Zambetti M. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil with and without doxorubicin in the adjuvant treatment of resectable breast cancer with one to three positive axillary nodes. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:1124-1130
    Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Carpenter JT, Velez-Garcia E, Aron BS, et al. Five-year results of a randomized comparison of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and fluorouracil (CAF) vs cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) for node positive breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1994;13:A68-A68

  4. 4

    Levine MN, Bramwell V, Pritchard K, et al. A pilot study of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil in patients with axillary node positive or locally advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1992;29:37-43
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  5. 5

    Levine MN, Bramwell VH, Pritchard KI, et al. A randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methrotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2651-2658
    Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Levine MN, Pritchard KI, Bramwell VH, Shepherd L, Tu D, Paul N. A randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5166-5170
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, et al. Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:719-726
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 2001;344:783-792
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Gusterson BA, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, et al. Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1049-1056
    Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group. Prolonged disease-free survival after one course of perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy for node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1989;320:491-496
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group. Combination adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: inadequacy of a single perioperative cycle. N Engl J Med 1988;319:677-683
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Allred DC, Clark GM, Tandon AK, et al. Her-2/neu in node-negative breast cancer: prognostic significance of overexpression influenced by the presence of in situ carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:599-605
    Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Mansour EG, Gray R, Shatila AH, et al. Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk node-negative breast cancer: an intergroup study. N Engl J Med 1989;320:485-490
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Thor AD, Berry DA, Budman DR, et al. erbB-2, p53, and efficacy of adjuvant therapy in lymph node-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1346-1360
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Wood WC, Budman DR, Korzun AH, et al. Dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, node-positive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1253-1259[Erratum, N Engl J Med 1994;331:139.]
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Arnould L, Fargeot P, Bonneterre J, Fumoleau P, Kerbrat P, Voigt J. Epirubicin dose response effect in node positive breast cancer patients is independent of HER2 overexpression: 10-year retrospective analysis of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003;76:A538-A538

  17. 17

    Bonneterre J, Roche H, Kerbrat P, Bremond A, Fumoleau P, Namer M. 10-Year update of benefit/risk ratio after adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in node positive (N+), early breast cancer (EBC) patients (pts). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003;22:A93-A93

  18. 18

    Del Mastro L, Bruzzi P, Venturini M, Cavazzini G, Contu A, Gallo L. HER2 expression and efficacy of dose-dense anthracycline containing adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:Suppl:A571-A571

  19. 19

    Rodenhuis S, Bontenbal M, Beex L, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for high-risk breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:7-16
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Di Leo A, Larsimont D, Gancberg D, et al. Her-2 and topo-isomerase IIalpha as predictive markers in a population of node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated with adjuvant CMF or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide. Ann Oncol 2001;12:1081-1089
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Di Leo A, Gancberg D, Larsimont D, et al. HER-2 amplification and topoisomerase IIalpha gene aberrations as predictive markers in node-positive breast cancer patients randomly treated either with an anthracycline-based therapy or with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:1107-1116
    Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Paik S, Bryant J, Park C, et al. erbB-2 and response to doxorubicin in patients with axillary lymph node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1361-1370
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Paik S, Bryant J, Tan-Chiu E, et al. HER2 and choice of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-15. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1991-1998
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Clahsen PC, van de Velde CJH, Duval C, et al. p53 Protein accumulation and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with node-negative early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:470-479
    Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Ravdin PM, Green S, Albain K, et al. Initial report of the SWOG biological correlative study of c-erbB-2 expression as a predictor of outcome in a trial comparing adjuvant CAF T with tamoxifen (T) alone. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1998;17:97A-97A

  26. 26

    Di Leo A, Larsimont D, Beauduin M, et al. CMF or anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients: 4-year results of a Belgian randomized clinical trial with predictive markers analysis. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1999;18:69A-69A

  27. 27

    Moliterni A, Menard S, Valagussa P, Biganzoli E, Boracchi P, Balsari A. HER2 overexpression and doxorubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:458-462
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    De Laurentiis M, Caputo F, Massarelli E, et al. HER2 expression and anthracycline effect: results from the Naples GUN 3 randomized trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001;20:A133-A133

  29. 29

    De Placido S, Perrone F, Carlomagno C, et al. CMF vs alternating CMF/EV in the adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer: a single centre randomised clinical trial (Naples GUN-3 study). Br J Cancer 1995;71:1283-1287
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    O'Malley FP, Parkes R, Latta E, et al. Comparison of HER2/neu status assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;115:504-511
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Allred DC, Clark GM, Elledge R, et al. Association of p53 protein expression with tumor cell proliferation rate and clinical outcome in node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:200-206
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Latta EK, Tjan S, Parkes RK, O'Malley FP. The role of HER2/neu overexpression/amplification in the progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma of the breast. Mod Pathol 2002;15:1318-1325
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  33. 33

    Landis JR, Koch GG. A one-way components of variance model for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:671-679
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  34. 34

    Pritchard KI, O'Malley FA, Andrulis I, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of HER2/neu in a randomized trial comparing CMF to CEF in premenopausal women with axillary lymph node positive breast cancer (NCIC CTG MA.5). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002;21:42A-42A

  35. 35

    Dressler LG, Berry DA, Broadwater G, et al. Comparison of HER2 status by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry to predict benefit from dose escalation of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4287-4297
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  36. 36

    Press MF, Sauter G, Bernstein L, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of HER-2 as a molecular target: an assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of laboratory testing in large, prospective, randomized clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:6598-6607
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  37. 37

    Knoop AS, Knudsen H, Balslev E, et al. Retrospective analysis of topoisomerase IIa amplifications and deletions as predictive markers in primary breast cancer patients randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7483-7490
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  38. 38

    Pegram MD, Finn RS, Arzoo K, Beryt M, Pietras RJ, Slamon DJ. The effect of HER-2/neu overexpression on chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity in human breast and ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene 1997;15:537-547
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  39. 39

    Konecny G, Fritz M, Untch M, et al. HER-2/neu overexpression and in vitro chemosensitivity to CMF and FEC in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001;69:53-63
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  40. 40

    Isola JJ, Tanner M, Holli K, Joensuu H. Amplification of topoisomerase IIalpha is a strong predictor of response to epirubicin-based chemotherapy in HER-2/neu positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000;64:31-31

  41. 41

    Jarvinen TA, Tanner M, Barlund M, Borg A, Isola J. Characterization of topoisomerase II alpha gene amplification and deletion in breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999;26:142-150
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  42. 42

    Mueller RE, Parkes RK, Andrulis I, O'Malley FP. Amplification of the TOP2A gene does not predict high levels of topoisomerase II alpha protein in human breast tumor samples. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2004;39:288-297
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  43. 43

    Press MF, Mass RD, Zhou J-Y, et al. Association of topoisomerase II-alpha (TOP2A) gene amplification with responsiveness to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy among women with metastatic breast cancer entered in the Herceptin H0648g pivotal clinical trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2005;23:847-847

  44. 44

    Slamon DJ. Update on HER-2 directed therapy. Session 1, 28th San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, Tex., December 6–11, 2005. (Accessed April 21, 2006, at http://www.sabcs.org.)

Citing Articles (151)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Martin C Chang, Janet I Malowany, Julita Mazurkiewicz, Martha Wood. (2012) ‘Genetic heterogeneity’ in HER2/neu testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization: a study of 2522 cases. Modern Pathology
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    K.A.B. Goddard, S. Weinmann, K. Richert-Boe, C. Chen, J. Bulkley, C. Wax. (2012) <i>HER2</i> Evaluation and Its Impact on Breast Cancer Treatment Decisions. Public Health Genomics 15:1, 1-10
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Pernille Braemer Hertel, Dongsheng Tu, Bent Ejlertsen, Maj-Britt Jensen, Eva Balslev, Shan Jiang, Frances P. O’Malley, Kathleen I. Pritchard, Lois E. Shepherd, Annette Bartels, Nils Brünner, Torsten O. Nielsen. (2011) TIMP-1 in combination with HER2 and TOP2A for prediction of benefit from adjuvant anthracyclines in high-risk breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Christos Vaklavas, Andres Forero-Torres. (2011) How do I Treat “Triple-Negative” Disease. Current Treatment Options in Oncology 12:4, 369-388
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Miriam Martini, Loredana Vecchione, Salvatore Siena, Sabine Tejpar, Alberto Bardelli. (2011) Targeted therapies: how personal should we go?. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    D. Rayson, T. M. Suter, C. Jackisch, S. van der Vegt, B. Bermejo, J. van den Bosch, G. L. Vivanco, A. M. van Gent, H. Wildiers, A. Torres, L. Provencher, M. Temizkan, J. Chirgwin, J. L. Canon, G. Ferrandina, S. Srinivasan, L. Zhang, D. J. Richel. (2011) Cardiac safety of adjuvant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with concurrent trastuzumab: a randomized phase II trial. Annals of Oncology
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Angelo Di Leo, Christine Desmedt, John M S Bartlett, Fanny Piette, Bent Ejlertsen, Kathleen I Pritchard, Denis Larsimont, Christopher Poole, Jorma Isola, Helena Earl, Henning Mouridsen, Frances P O'Malley, Fatima Cardoso, Minna Tanner, Alison Munro, Chris J Twelves, Christos Sotiriou, Lois Shepherd, David Cameron, Martine J Piccart, Marc Buyse. (2011) HER2 and TOP2A as predictive markers for anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. The Lancet Oncology 12:12, 1134-1142
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Kathleen I. Pritchard, Alison Munro, Frances P. O’Malley, Dongsheng Tu, Xiao Li, Mark N. Levine, Lois Shepherd, Stephen Chia, John M. S. Bartlett. (2011) Chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) duplication as a predictor of anthracycline response: evidence from the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) MA.5 Trial. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Slamon, Dennis, Eiermann, Wolfgang, Robert, Nicholas, Pienkowski, Tadeusz, Martin, Miguel, Press, Michael, Mackey, John, Glaspy, John, Chan, Arlene, Pawlicki, Marek, Pinter, Tamas, Valero, Vicente, Liu, Mei-Ching, Sauter, Guido, von Minckwitz, Gunter, Visco, Frances, Bee, Valerie, Buyse, Marc, Bendahmane, Belguendouz, Tabah-Fisch, Isabelle, Lindsay, Mary-Ann, Riva, Alessandro, Crown, John, . (2011) Adjuvant Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 365:14, 1273-1283
    Full Text

  10. 10

    Monica N. Fornier. (2011) Anthracyclines in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: state of the art. European Journal of Cancer Supplements 9:2, 5-10
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Zhiyuan Xu, Nicholas F. Marko, Sam T. Chao, Lilyana Angelov, Michael A. Vogelbaum, John H. Suh, Gene H. Barnett, Robert J. Weil. (2011) Relationship Between HER2 Status and Prognosis in Women with Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Yota Yamamoto, Hiromichi Yamai, Junichi Seike, Takahiro Yoshida, Hirokazu Takechi, Yoshihito Furukita, Koichiro Kajiura, Takuya Minato, Yoshimi Bando, Akira Tangoku. (2011) Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients Positive for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Family Can Be Improved by Initial Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Fluorouracil, and Cisplatin. Annals of Surgical Oncology
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Qiang Fu, Yanfeng Wu, Fang Yan, Ning Wang, Wenying Wang, Xuetao Cao, Yajie Wang, Tao Wan. (2011) Efficient induction of a Her2-specific anti-tumor response by dendritic cells pulsed with a Hsp70L1–Her2341–456 fusion protein. Cellular and Molecular Immunology 8:5, 424-432
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Mohamed B Satti. (2011) Oestrogen receptor/progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in breast cancer: a 9-year study at Princess Noorah Oncology Center, Saudi Arabia. Histopathology 59:3, 537-542
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Beata Biesaga, Joanna Niemiec, Marek Ziobro, Joanna Wysocka, Anna Kruczak. (2011) Prognostic potential of topoisomerase IIα and HER2 in a retrospective analysis of early advanced breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy. The Breast 20:4, 338-350
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    W. Zhang, W. Ding, Y. Chen, M. Feng, Y. Ouyang, Y. Yu, Z. He. (2011) Up-regulation of breast cancer resistance protein plays a role in HER2-mediated chemoresistance through PI3K/Akt and nuclear factor-kappa B signaling pathways in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica 43:8, 647-653
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    F. P. O’Malley, S. Chia, D. Tu, L. E. Shepherd, M. N. Levine, D. Huntsman, V. H. Bramwell, I. L. Andrulis, K. I. Pritchard. (2011) Topoisomerase II alpha protein and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy with CEF compared to CMF in the NCIC CTG randomized MA.5 adjuvant trial. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 128:2, 401-409
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    M. Martin, A. Romero, M. C. U. Cheang, J. A. López García-Asenjo, J. A. García-Saenz, B. Oliva, J. M. Román, X. He, A. Casado, J. Torre, V. Furio, J. Puente, T. Caldés, J. A. Vidart, Sara Lopez-Tarruella, E. Diaz-Rubio, C. M. Perou. (2011) Genomic predictors of response to doxorubicin versus docetaxel in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 128:1, 127-136
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Giuseppe Bogina, Laura Bortesi, Marcella Marconi, Marco Venturini, Gianluigi Lunardi, Francesca Coati, Alberto Massocco, Erminia Manfrin, Cristina Pegoraro, Giuseppe Zamboni. (2011) Comparison of hormonal receptor and HER-2 status between breast primary tumours and relapsing tumours: clinical implications of progesterone receptor loss. Virchows Archiv 459:1, 1-10
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Alíz Nikolényi, Gabriella Uhercsák, Melinda Csenki, Sándor Hamar, Erika Csörgő, Ervin Tánczos, László Thurzó, Thomas Brodowicz, Maria Wagnerova, Zsuzsanna Kahán. (2011) Tumour Topoisomerase II Alpha Protein Expression and Outcome After Adjuvant Dose-Dense Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy. Pathology & Oncology Research
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    L. Yao, Y. Liu, Z. Li, T. Ouyang, J. Li, T. Wang, Z. Fan, T. Fan, B. Lin, Y. Xie. (2011) HER2 and response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Annals of Oncology 22:6, 1326-1331
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    K. Zaman, X. Durando, J.-F. Baurain, Y. Humblet, F. Mazzeo, M. Bostnavaron, N. Meheust, S. Monnoyer-Favrel, J.-P. Machiels, J. Bauer. (2011) A phase I clinical and pharmacological study evaluating vinflunine in combination with doxorubicin as first line treatment in metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 127:3, 689-696
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Sally Greenberg, Alison Stopeck, Hope S. Rugo. (2011) Systemic treatment of early breast cancer-a biological perspective. Journal of Surgical Oncology 103:6, 619-626
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Atocha Romero, Miguel Martín, Maggie C.U. Cheang, José Antonio López García-Asenjo, Belén Oliva, Xiaping He, Miguel de la Hoya, Jose Ángel García Sáenz, Manuel Arroyo Fernández, Eduardo Díaz Rubio, Charles M. Perou, Trinidad Caldés Llopis. (2011) Assessment of Topoisomerase II α Status in Breast Cancer by Quantitative PCR, Gene Expression Microarrays, Immunohistochemistry, and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization. The American Journal of Pathology 178:4, 1453-1460
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Valentina Rossi, Stefania Redana, Andrea Milani, Elena Geuna, Giorgio Valabrega, Massimo Aglietta, Filippo Montemurro. (2011) Trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting: a practical review. Therapy 8:2, 161-177
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Natalie Galanina, Veerle Bossuyt, Lyndsay N. Harris. (2011) Molecular Predictors of Response to Therapy for Breast Cancer. The Cancer Journal 17:2, 96-103
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Sandra A OʼToole, Christina I Selinger, Ewan K A Millar, Trina Lum, Jane M Beith. (2011) Molecular assays in breast cancer pathology. Pathology 43:2, 116-127
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Rena Callahan, Sara Hurvitz. (2011) Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive breast cancer: current management of early, advanced, and recurrent disease. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 23:1, 37-43
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Rohit Bhargava, Nicole N. Esposito, David J. Dabbs. 2011. Immunohistology of the Breast. , 763-819.
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Fengyan Xu, Dalin Li, Qiujin Zhang, Zhenkun Fu, Jie Zhang, Weiguang Yuan, Shuang Chen, Da Pang, Dianjun Li. (2011) ICOS gene polymorphisms are associated with sporadic breast cancer: a case-control study. BMC Cancer 11:1, 392
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Pierre-Jean Lamy, Frédéric Fina, Caroline Bascoul-Mollevi, Anne-Claire Laberenne, Pierre-Marie Martin, L'Houcine Ouafik, William Jacot. (2011) Quantification and clinical relevance of gene amplification at chromosome 17q12-q21 in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-amplified breast cancers. Breast Cancer Research 13:1, R15
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Sejal Shah, Beiyun Chen. (2011) Testing for HER2 in Breast Cancer: A Continuing Evolution. Pathology Research International 2011, 1-16
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Elmar Stickeler. (2011) Prognostic and Predictive Markers for Treatment Decisions in Early Breast Cancer. Breast Care 6:3, 193-198
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Geumhee Gwak, Ji-Young Kim, Keongmee Park, Young Joo Shin, Hyunjin Cho, Sung Jin Park, Geun Ho Yang, Byung Noe Bae, Ki Whan Kim, Sehwan Han. (2011) Comparison of Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Doxorubicin Plus Vinorelbine in Primary Breast Cancer. Journal of Breast Cancer 14:2, 129
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Seho Park, Hyung Seok Park, Ja Seung Koo, Woo Ick Yang, Seung Il Kim, Byeong-Woo Park. (2011) Breast cancers presenting luminal B subtype features show higher discordant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 results between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancern/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Mu-Tai Liu, Wen-Tao Huang, Ai-Yih Wang, Chia-Chun Huang, Chao-Yuan Huang, Tung-Hao Chang, Chu-Pin Pi, Hao-Han Yang. (2010) Prediction of outcome of patients with metastatic breast cancer: evaluation with prognostic factors and Nottingham prognostic index. Supportive Care in Cancer 18:12, 1553-1564
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Ricardo H. Alvarez, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi. (2010) Primary systemic therapy for operable breast cancer patients: the need for the new generation of trial design. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 124:3, 701-705
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Jeremy D. Gates, Guy T. Clifton, Linda C. Benavides, Alan K. Sears, Mark G. Carmichael, Matthew T. Hueman, Jarrod P. Holmes, Yusuf H. Jama, Mohamed Mursal, Athina Zacharia, Kathy Ciano, Steven Khoo, Alexander Stojadinovic, Sathibalan Ponniah, George E. Peoples. (2010) Circulating regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25+FOXP3+) decrease in breast cancer patients after vaccination with a modified MHC class II HER2/neu (AE37) peptide. Vaccine 28:47, 7476-7482
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Rebecca A. Burrell, Nicolai Juul, Stephen R. Johnston, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Zoltan Szallasi, Charles Swanton. (2010) Targeting chromosomal instability and tumour heterogeneity in HER2-positive breast cancer. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 111:4, 782-790
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    A F Munro, D A Cameron, J M S Bartlett. (2010) Targeting anthracyclines in early breast cancer: new candidate predictive biomarkers emerge. Oncogene 29:38, 5231-5240
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Roopali Roy, Christine M. Coticchia, Jiang Yang, Marsha A. Moses. 2010. Biomarkers in Cancer. , 355-380.
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Hubert E. Blum. (2010) Individualized medicine 2010. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 14:9, 2257-2263
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Jean-Jacques Monsuez, Jean-Christophe Charniot, Noëlle Vignat, Jean-Yves Artigou. (2010) Cardiac side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. International Journal of Cardiology 144:1, 3-15
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Yan Shi, Patricia G. Wasserman. 2010. Cell Sample Preparation for Clinical Cytopathology: Current Status and Future Development. , 219-234.
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Catherine Oakman, Erica Moretti, Angelo Di Leo. (2010) Re-searching anthracycline therapy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 123:1, 171-175
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Efrat Dotan, Lori J. Goldstein. (2010) Optimizing Chemotherapy Regimens for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer 10:0, E8-E15
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Christian Schindlbeck, D. Mayr, C. Olivier, B. Rack, V. Engelstaedter, J. Jueckstock, C. Jenderek, U. Andergassen, U. Jeschke, K. Friese. (2010) Topoisomerase IIα expression rather than gene amplification predicts responsiveness of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in women with primary breast cancer. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 136:7, 1029-1037
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Catherine M. Kelly, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi. (2010) Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: What, When, and for Whom?. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America 19:3, 649-668
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Per E. Lønning. (2010) Molecular basis for therapy resistance. Molecular Oncology 4:3, 284-300
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Ronan W. Glynn, Nicola Miller, Maria C. Whelan, Michael J. Kerin. (2010) Topoisomerase 2 Alpha and the Case for Individualized Breast Cancer Therapy. Annals of Surgical Oncology 17:5, 1392-1397
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Yasuo Miyoshi, Masafumi Kurosumi, Junichi Kurebayashi, Nariaki Matsuura, Masato Takahashi, Eriko Tokunaga, Chiyomi Egawa, Norikazu Masuda, Seishi Kono, Koji Morimoto, Seung Jin Kim, Masatsugu Okishiro, Tetsu Yanagisawa, Satsuki Ueda, Tetsuya Taguchi, Yasuhiro Tamaki, Shinzaburo Noguchi. (2010) Predictive factors for anthracycline-based chemotherapy for human breast cancer. Breast Cancer 17:2, 103-109
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Emad A. Rakha, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Ian O. Ellis. (2010) Combinatorial biomarker expression in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 120:2, 293-308
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Gottfried E. Konecny, Giovanni Pauletti, Michael Untch, He-Jing Wang, Volker Möbus, Walther Kuhn, Christoph Thomssen, Nadia Harbeck, Ling Wang, Sophia Apple, Fritz Jänicke, Dennis J. Slamon. (2010) Association between HER2, TOP2A, and response to anthracycline-based preoperative chemotherapy in high-risk primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 120:2, 481-489
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    John MS Bartlett, Alison F Munro, Janet A Dunn, Christopher McConkey, Sarah Jordan, Chris J Twelves, David A Cameron, Jeremy Thomas, Fiona M Campbell, Daniel W Rea, Elena Provenzano, Carlos Caldas, Paul Pharoah, Louise Hiller, Helena Earl, Christopher J Poole. (2010) Predictive markers of anthracycline benefit: a prospectively planned analysis of the UK National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial (NEAT/BR9601). The Lancet Oncology 11:3, 266-274
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    April Davoli, Barbara A. Hocevar, Thomas L. Brown. (2010) Progression and treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 65:4, 611-623
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Ritesh Patil, Guy T. Clifton, Jarrod P. Holmes, Asna Amin, Mark G. Carmichael, Jeremy D. Gates, Linda H. Benavides, Matthew T. Hueman, Sathibalan Ponniah, George E. Peoples. (2010) Clinical and Immunologic Responses of HLA-A3+ Breast Cancer Patients Vaccinated with the HER2/neu-Derived Peptide Vaccine, E75, in a Phase I/II Clinical Trial. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 210:2, 140-147
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Xinjian Liu, Jinjun Li, Yuhua Tian, Ping Xu, Xiafang Chen, Kuangchen Xie, Zhengjun Qiu, Yufei Wang, Dabing Zhang, Frank Wolf, Chuanyuan Li, Qian Huang. (2010) Enhanced Pancreatic Cancer Gene Therapy by Combination of Adenoviral Vector Expressing c-erb-B2 (Her-2/neu)-Targeted Immunotoxin with a Replication-Competent Adenovirus or Etoposide. Human Gene Therapy 21:2, 157-170
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Niamh C. Murphy, Andrew V. Biankin, Ewan K.A. Millar, Catriona M. McNeil, Sandra A. O'Toole, Davendra Segara, Paul Crea, Monilola A. Olayioye, C. Soon Lee, Stephen B. Fox, Adrienne L. Morey, Michael Christie, Elizabeth A. Musgrove, Roger J. Daly, Geoffrey J. Lindeman, Susan M. Henshall, Jane E. Visvader, Robert L. Sutherland. (2010) Loss of STARD10 expression identifies a group of poor prognosis breast cancers independent of HER2/Neu and triple negative status. International Journal of CancerNA-NA
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    K. I. Pritchard, F. O'malley, L. Shepherd, M. N. Levine, D. Tu, V. Bramwell, I. Andrulis, S. Chia. (2009) Response: Re: Topoisomerase II Alpha and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 101:24, 1736-1737
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Byoung Yong SHIM, Chi Hong KIM, Myeong Im AHN, Sung Whan KIM, Deog Gon CHO, Kyo Do CHO, Jinyoung YOO, Hoon-Kyo KIM. (2009) HER2 and tau expression as potential markers for response and survival to first line taxane plus cisplatin therapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 5:4, 232-241
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Catherine Oakman, Erica Moretti, Francesca Galardi, Libero Santarpia, Angelo Di Leo. (2009) The role of topoisomerase IIα and HER-2 in predicting sensitivity to anthracyclines in breast cancer patients. Cancer Treatment Reviews 35:8, 662-667
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Scott Ely. (2009) Personalized medicine: individualized care of cancer patients. Translational Research 154:6, 303-308
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Nan Soon Wong, Benjamin O Anderson, Kei Siong Khoo, Peng Tiam Ang, Cheng Har Yip, Yen-Shen Lu, Narind Voravud, Zhi-Ming Shao, Kathleen I Pritchard. (2009) Management of HER2-positive breast cancer in Asia: consensus statement from the Asian Oncology Summit 2009. The Lancet Oncology 10:11, 1077-1085
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Erica Moretti, Catherine Oakman, Angelo Di Leo. (2009) Predicting anthracycline benefit: have we made any progress?. Current Opinion in Oncology 21:6, 507-515
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Katja Specht, Nadia Harbeck, Jan Smida, Katja Annecke, Ulrike Reich, Joerg Naehrig, Rupert Langer, Joerg Mages, Raymonde Busch, Elisabeth Kruse, Ludger Klein-Hitpass, Manfred Schmitt, Marion Kiechle, Heinz Hoefler. (2009) Expression profiling identifies genes that predict recurrence of breast cancer after adjuvant CMF-based chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 118:1, 45-56
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Karen Y. Wonders, David S. Hydock, Stephanie Greufe, Carole M. Schneider, Reid Hayward. (2009) Endurance exercise training preserves cardiac function in rats receiving doxorubicin and the HER-2 inhibitor GW2974. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 64:6, 1105-1113
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    X Liu, J Wu, S Zhang, C Li, Q Huang. (2009) Novel strategies to augment genetically delivered immunotoxin molecular therapy for cancer therapy. Cancer Gene Therapy 16:11, 861-872
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Siew-Kee Low, Kazuma Kiyotani, Taisei Mushiroda, Yataro Daigo, Yusuke Nakamura, Hitoshi Zembutsu. (2009) Association study of genetic polymorphism in ABCC4 with cyclophosphamide-induced adverse drug reactions in breast cancer patients. Journal of Human Genetics 54:10, 564-571
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Felipe C. Geyer, Maria A. Lopez-Garcia, Maryou B. Lambros, Jorge S. Reis-Filho. (2009) Genetic characterization of breast cancer and implications for clinical management. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 13:10, 4090-4103
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Donald A Berry. (2009) Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in older women. Women's Health 5:5, 453-457
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Irfan Cicin, Hakan Karagol, Ufuk Usta, Atakan Sezer, Sernaz Uzunoglu, Rusen Alas-Cosar, Tarkan Yetisyigit, Kazim Uygun. (2009) Triple negative breast cancer compared to hormone receptor negative/HER2 positive breast cancer. Medical Oncology 26:3, 335-343
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    A. Medjdoub, Z. Tahari, T. Sahraoui, F. Z. Kebir. (2009) Étude du profil d’expression de la protéine HER2 dans 50 cas de cancers mammaires dans la wilaya d’Oran. Journal africain du cancer / African Journal of Cancer 1:3, 127-129
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Tsz-Kok YAU, Ting-Ying NG, Inda Sung SOONG, Chi-Wai CHOI, ka-On LAM, Alice Wan-Ying NG, Anne Wing-Mui LEE, Yuk TUNG. (2009) Toxicity of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in Chinese patients - the Hong Kong experience. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 5:2, 123-128
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    D. J. Slamon, M. F. Press. (2009) Alterations in the TOP2A and HER2 Genes: Association With Adjuvant Anthracycline Sensitivity in Human Breast Cancers. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 101:9, 615-618
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    F. P. O'Malley, S. Chia, D. Tu, L. E. Shepherd, M. N. Levine, V. H. Bramwell, I. L. Andrulis, K. I. Pritchard. (2009) Topoisomerase II Alpha and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 101:9, 644-650
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    John Mackey, Deanna McLeod, Joseph Ragaz, Karen Gelmon, Sunil Verma, Kathleen Pritchard, Kara Laing, Louise Provencher, Lauren F. Charbonneau. (2009) Adjuvant targeted therapy in early breast cancer. Cancer 115:6, 1154-1168
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    János Fodor. (2009) Evidenciák a korai invazív emlőrák sugárkezelésében: hagyományos klinikai jellemzők és biomarkerek. Magyar Onkológia 53:1, 7-14
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Chau Dang, Clifford Hudis. (2009) The role of adjuvant anthracyclines for breast cancer treatment: Can we use molecular predictors?. Current Breast Cancer Reports 1:1, 5-11
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Peter S. Hall, David A. Cameron. (2009) Current perspective – Trastuzumab. European Journal of Cancer 45:1, 12-18
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Ja Seung Koo, Woohee Jung, Eunah Shin, Hy-de Lee, Joon Jeong, Kun-Hong Kim, Hyeongjae Jeong, Soon Won Hong. (2009) Impact of Grade, Hormone Receptor, and HER-2 Status in Women with Breast Cancer on Response to Specific Chemotherapeutic Agents by in vitro Adenosine Triphosphate-based Chemotherapy Response Assay. Journal of Korean Medical Science 24:6, 1150
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    Ben Calster, Isabelle Vanden Bempt, Maria Drijkoningen, Nathalie Pochet, Jiqiu Cheng, Sabine Huffel, Wouter Hendrickx, Julie Decock, Huei-Jean Huang, Karin Leunen, Frederic Amant, Patrick Berteloot, Robert Paridaens, Hans Wildiers, Erik Limbergen, Caroline Weltens, Dirk Timmerman, Toon Gorp, Ann Smeets, Walter Bogaert, Ignace Vergote, Marie-Rose Christiaens, Patrick Neven. (2009) Axillary lymph node status of operable breast cancers by combined steroid receptor and HER-2 status: triple positive tumours are more likely lymph node positive. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 113:1, 181-187
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    2009. BIBLIOGRAPHIE. , 176-189.
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Federico Rojo, Joan Albanell, Ana Rovira, Josep Maria Corominas, Felix Manzarbeitia. (2008) Targeted therapies in breast cancer. Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology 25:4, 245-261
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Yaacov Richard Lawrence, Maria Werner-Wasik, Adam P Dicker. (2008) Biologically conformal treatment: biomarkers and functional imaging in radiation oncology. Future Oncology 4:5, 689-704
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    Dehong Yang, Hong Liu, Jing Zhao. (2008) Analysis of the clinicopathologic features and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology 5:5, 387-390
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Laura Orlando, Barbara Del Curto, Sara Gandini, Raffaella Ghisini, Elisabetta Pietri, Rosalba Torrisi, Alessandra Balduzzi, Anna Cardillo, Silvia Dellapasqua, Paolo Veronesi, Giuseppe Viale, Aron Goldhirsch, Marco Colleoni. (2008) Topoisomerase IIα gene status and prediction of pathological complete remission after anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in endocrine non-responsive Her2/neu-positive breast cancer. The Breast 17:5, 506-511
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Allen M Gown, Lynn C Goldstein, Todd S Barry, Steven J Kussick, Patricia L Kandalaft, Patricia M Kim, Christopher C Tse. (2008) High concordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for HER2 status in breast cancer requires a normalized IHC scoring system. Modern Pathology 21:10, 1271-1277
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Shailendra Verma, Susan Dent, Benjamin J.W. Chow, Daniel Rayson, Tamar Safra. (2008) Metastatic breast cancer: The role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin after conventional anthracyclines. Cancer Treatment Reviews 34:5, 391-406
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    M Spears, J Kenicer, A F Munro, JMS Bartlett. (2008) Type I receptor tyrosine kinases as predictive or prognostic markers in early breast cancer. Biomarkers in Medicine 2:4, 397-407
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Kewal K. Jain. (2008) Innovations, challenges and future prospects of oncoproteomics. Molecular Oncology 2:2, 153-160
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Rainer Fagerholm, Barbara Hofstetter, Johanna Tommiska, Kirsimari Aaltonen, Radek Vrtel, Kirsi Syrjäkoski, Anne Kallioniemi, Outi Kilpivaara, Arto Mannermaa, Veli-Matti Kosma, Matti Uusitupa, Matti Eskelinen, Vesa Kataja, Kristiina Aittomäki, Karl von Smitten, Päivi Heikkilä, Jiri Lukas, Kaija Holli, Jirina Bartkova, Carl Blomqvist, Jiri Bartek, Heli Nevanlinna. (2008) NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 NQO1*2 genotype (P187S) is a strong prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer. Nature Genetics 40:7, 844-853
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Chieh-Feng Chang, Chao-Yu Chen, Fu-Hsiung Chang, Shih-Peng Tai, Cheng-Ying Chen, Che-Hang Yu, Yi-Bing Tseng, Tsung-Han Tsai, I-Shuo Liu, Wei-Fang Su, Chi-Kuang Sun. (2008) Cell tracking and detection of molecular expression in live cells using lipid-enclosed CdSe quantum dots as contrast agents for epi-third harmonic generation microscopy. Optics Express 16:13, 9534
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    M. Martin, A. Rodriguez-Lescure, A. Ruiz, E. Alba, L. Calvo, M. Ruiz-Borrego, B. Munarriz, C. A. Rodriguez, C. Crespo, E. de Alava, J. A. Lopez Garcia-Asenjo, M. D. Guitian, S. Almenar, J. F. Gonzalez-Palacios, F. Vera, J. Palacios, M. Ramos, J. M. Gracia Marco, A. Lluch, I. Alvarez, M. A. Segui, J. I. Mayordomo, A. Anton, J. M. Baena, A. Plazaola, A. Modolell, A. Pelegri, J. R. Mel, E. Aranda, E. Adrover, J. V. Alvarez, J. L. Garcia Puche, P. Sanchez-Rovira, S. Gonzalez, J. M. Lopez-Vega, . (2008) Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, and Cyclophosphamide Alone or Followed by Paclitaxel for Early Breast Cancer. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 100:11, 805-814
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    Yasuo Miyoshi, Masafumi Kurosumi, Junichi Kurebayashi, Nariaki Matsuura, Masato Takahashi, Eriko Tokunaga, Chiyomi Egawa, Norikazu Masuda, Seung Jin Kim, Masatsugu Okishiro, Tetsu Yanagisawa, Satsuki Ueda, Tetsuya Taguchi, Yasuhiro Tamaki, Shinzaburo Noguchi. (2008) Topoisomerase IIalpha-positive and BRCA1-negative phenotype: Association with favorable response to epirubicin-based regimens for human breast cancers. Cancer Letters 264:1, 44-53
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    D. Rayson, D. Richel, S. Chia, C. Jackisch, S. van der Vegt, T. Suter. (2008) Anthracycline-trastuzumab regimens for HER2/neu-overexpressing breast cancer: current experience and future strategies. Annals of Oncology 19:9, 1530-1539
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    Sabrina D. Silva, Danyel E. Perez, Fabio A. Alves, Inês N. Nishimoto, Clóvis A.L. Pinto, Luiz P. Kowalski, Edgard Graner. (2008) ErbB2 and fatty acid synthase (FAS) expression in 102 squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue: Correlation with clinical outcomes. Oral Oncology 44:5, 484-490
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    Michael G. Ozawa, Amado J. Zurita, Emmanuel Dias-Neto, Diana N. Nunes, Richard L. Sidman, Juri G. Gelovani, Wadih Arap, Renata Pasqualini. (2008) Beyond Receptor Expression Levels: The Relevance of Target Accessibility in Ligand-Directed Pharmacodelivery Systems. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 18:4, 126-133
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    Bindi Dhesy-Thind, Kathleen I. Pritchard, Hans Messersmith, Frances O’Malley, Leela Elavathil, Maureen Trudeau. (2008) HER2/neu in systemic therapy for women with breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 109:2, 209-229
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Allen M Gown. (2008) Current issues in ER and HER2 testing by IHC in breast cancer. Modern Pathology 21, S8-S15
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    Sudeep Gupta. (2008) HER2 positivity predicts a benefit from paclitaxel treatment after adjuvant chemotherapy. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology 5:5, 252-253
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Edurne Arriola, Caterina Marchio, David SP Tan, Suzanne C Drury, Maryou B Lambros, Rachael Natrajan, Socorro Maria Rodriguez-Pinilla, Alan Mackay, Narinder Tamber, Kerry Fenwick, Chris Jones, Mitch Dowsett, Alan Ashworth, Jorge S Reis-Filho. (2008) Genomic analysis of the HER2/TOP2A amplicon in breast cancer and breast cancer cell lines. Laboratory Investigation 88:5, 491-503
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    Lionel Apetoh, Grégoire Mignot, Theocharis Panaretakis, Guido Kroemer, Laurence Zitvogel. (2008) Immunogenicity of anthracyclines: moving towards more personalized medicine. Trends in Molecular Medicine 14:4, 141-151
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    Alfredo Santinelli, Eleonora Pisa, Daniela Stramazzotti, Guidalberto Fabris. (2008) HER-2 status discrepancy between primary breast cancer and metastatic sites. Impact on target therapy. International Journal of Cancer 122:5, 999-1004
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    I.A. Buhimschi, C.S. Buhimschi. (2008) Proteomics of the Amniotic Fluid in Assessment of the Placenta. Relevance for Preterm Birth. Placenta 29, 95-101
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    Ahmad Awada, Martine J. Piccart-Gebhart. (2008) Management of HER-2/neu-positive metastatic breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer Supplements 6:4, 2-9
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    Fabrice Andre, Chafika Mazouni, Cornelia Liedtke, Shu-Wan Kau, Debby Frye, Marjorie Green, Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo, W. Fraser Symmans, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Lajos Pusztai. (2008) HER2 expression and efficacy of preoperative paclitaxel/FAC chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 108:2, 183-190
    CrossRef

  107. 107

    Hiroyasu Yamashiro, Masakazu Toi. (2008) Update of evidence in chemotherapy for breast cancer. International Journal of Clinical Oncology 13:1, 3-7
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    Isabelle Soerjomataram, Marieke W. J. Louwman, Jacques G. Ribot, Jan A. Roukema, Jan Willem W. Coebergh. (2008) An overview of prognostic factors for long-term survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 107:3, 309-330
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    George Dranitsaris, Daniel Rayson, Mark Vincent, Jose Chang, Karen Gelmon, David Sandor, Greg Reardon. (2008) The development of a predictive model to estimate cardiotoxic risk for patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving anthracyclines. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 107:3, 443-450
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    Mario Campone, Gaël Deplanque, Nadine Dohollou, Joseph Gligorov, Rémy Largillier, Moïse Namer, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, Thierry Petit, Marc Spielmann, Laurent Zelek. (2008) Cancer du sein métastatique. Oncologie 10:2, 136-148
    CrossRef

  111. 111

    A. Gennari, M. P. Sormani, P. Pronzato, M. Puntoni, M. Colozza, U. Pfeffer, P. Bruzzi. (2008) HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 100:1, 14-20
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    Jin Zhang, Yan Liu. (2008) HER2 over-expression and response to different chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B 9:1, 5-9
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    D Faratian, J Bartlett. (2008) Predictive markers in breast cancer - the future. Histopathology 52:1, 91-98
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    S J L Payne, R L Bowen, J L Jones, C A Wells. (2008) Predictive markers in breast cancer - the present. Histopathology 52:1, 82-90
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    Alinta Hegmane, Uldis Vikmanis. (2008) Her2 Expression and Response of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences. 62:3, 129-132
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    Mary E.R. OʼBrien. (2008) Single-agent treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for metastatic breast cancer. Anti-Cancer Drugs 19:1, 1-7
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    S.-P. Tai, Y. Wu, D.-B. Shieh, L.-J. Chen, K.-J. Lin, C.-H. Yu, S.-W. Chu, C.-H. Chang, X.-Y. Shi, Y.-C. Wen, K.-H. Lin, T.-M. Liu, C.-K. Sun. (2007) Molecular Imaging of Cancer Cells Using Plasmon-Resonant-Enhanced Third-Harmonic-Generation in Silver Nanoparticles. Advanced Materials 19:24, 4520-4523
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    Michael S. Gee, Rabi Upadhyay, Henry Bergquist, Ralph Weissleder, Lee Josephson, Umar Mahmood. (2007) Multiparameter noninvasive assessment of treatment susceptibility, drug target inhibition and tumor response guides cancer treatment. International Journal of Cancer 121:11, 2492-2500
    CrossRef

  119. 119

    Cabot, Richard C.Harris, Nancy Lee, Shepard, Jo-Anne O., Rosenberg, Eric S., Cort, Alice M., Ebeling, Sally H.Peters, Christine C., Winer, Eric P., Harris, Jay R., Smith, Barbara L., D'Alessandro, Helen Anne, Brachtel, Elena F., . (2007) Case 32-2007. New England Journal of Medicine 357:16, 1640-1648
    Full Text

  120. 120

    Hayes, Daniel F., Thor, Ann D., Dressler, Lynn G., Weaver, Donald, Edgerton, Susan, Cowan, David, Broadwater, Gloria, Goldstein, Lori J., Martino, Silvana, Ingle, James N., Henderson, I. Craig, Norton, Larry, Winer, Eric P., Hudis, Clifford A., Ellis, Matthew J., Berry, Donald A., . (2007) HER2 and Response to Paclitaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 357:15, 1496-1506
    Full Text

  121. 121

    Graeme AM Fraser, Ralph M Meyer. (2007) Biomarkers and the design of clinical trials in cancer. Biomarkers in Medicine 1:3, 387-397
    CrossRef

  122. 122

    C.S. Denlinger, L.J. Goldstein. (2007) Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil as Adjuvant Therapy for Early Breast Cancer. Breast Diseases: A Year Book Quarterly 18:3, 314-316
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    Carlos Henrique Menke, Paula Raffin Pohlmann, Ariane Backes, Rodrigo Cericatto, Mônica Oliveira, Ana Bittelbrunn, Gilberto Schwartsmann. (2007) Tumor Size as a Surrogate End Point for the Detection of Early Breast Cancer: A 30-Year (1972?2002), Single-Center Experience in Southern Brazil. The Breast Journal 13:5, 448-456
    CrossRef

  124. 124

    G. Brockhoff, B. Heckel, E. Schmidt-Bruecken, M. Plander, F. Hofstaedter, A. Vollmann, S. Diermeier. (2007) Differential impact of Cetuximab, Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab on BT474 and SK-BR-3 breast cancer cell proliferation. Cell Proliferation 40:4, 488-507
    CrossRef

  125. 125

    S. Pruthi, K. R. Brandt, A. C. Degnim, M. P. Goetz, E. A. Perez, C. A. Reynolds, P. J. Schomberg, G. K. Dy, J. N. Ingle. (2007) A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Management of Breast Cancer, Part 1: Prevention and Diagnosis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 82:8, 999-1012
    CrossRef

  126. 126

    Kan Yonemori, Noriyuki Katsumata, Masayuki Kaneko, Hajime Uno, Koji Matsumoto, Tsutomu Kouno, Chikako Shimizu, Masashi Ando, Masahiro Takeuchi, Yasuhiro Fujiwara. (2007) Prediction of response to repeat utilization of anthracycline in recurrent breast cancer patients previously administered anthracycline-containing chemotherapeutic regimens as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 103:3, 313-318
    CrossRef

  127. 127

    Gerald Batist. (2007) Cardiac safety of liposomal anthracyclines. Cardiovascular Toxicology 7:2, 72-74
    CrossRef

  128. 128

    Filippo Montemurro, Stefania Redana, Giorgio Valabrega, Massimo Aglietta. (2007) Recent advances in the medical management of breast cancer: highlights from the 29th San Antonio Breast Cancer Conference. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 8:8, 1179-1188
    CrossRef

  129. 129

    Josie Ursini-Siegel, Babette Schade, Robert D. Cardiff, William J. Muller. (2007) Insights from transgenic mouse models of ERBB2-induced breast cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer 7:5, 389-397
    CrossRef

  130. 130

    Heather L. McArthur, Clifford A. Hudis. (2007) Breast Cancer Chemotherapy. The Cancer Journal 13:3, 141-147
    CrossRef

  131. 131

    Federico Cappuzzo, Claudio Ligorio, Luca Toschi, Elisa Rossi, Rocco Trisolini, Daniela Paioli, Elisabetta Magrini, Giovanna Finocchiaro, Stefania Bartolini, Alessandra Cancellieri, Fred R. Hirsch, Lucio Crino, Marileila Varella-Garcia. (2007) EGFR and HER2 Gene Copy Number and Response to First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2:5, 423-429
    CrossRef

  132. 132

    James E. Korkola, G. Varuni Kondagunta, Victor E. Reuter, Robert J. Motzer, R.S.K. Chaganti. (2007) Interferon-α Resistance Associated Genes in Renal Cell Carcinoma Identified by Expression Profiling. The Journal of Urology 177:4, 1264-1268
    CrossRef

  133. 133

    George W. Elgart. 2007. Metastatic Neoplasms. , 389-400.
    CrossRef

  134. 134

    Heather L. McArthur, Clifford A. Hudis. (2007) Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America 21:2, 207-222
    CrossRef

  135. 135

    D Pils, A Pinter, J Reibenwein, A Alfanz, P Horak, B C Schmid, L Hefler, R Horvat, A Reinthaller, R Zeillinger, M Krainer. (2007) In ovarian cancer the prognostic influence of HER2/neu is not dependent on the CXCR4/SDF-1 signalling pathway. British Journal of Cancer 96:3, 485-491
    CrossRef

  136. 136

    Max S. Mano, Daniela D. Rosa, Evandro De Azambuja, Gustavo F.V. Ismael, Virginie Durbecq. (2007) The 17q12-q21 amplicon: Her2 and topoisomerase-IIα and their importance to the biology of solid tumours. Cancer Treatment Reviews 33:1, 64-77
    CrossRef

  137. 137

    Gianluigi Ferretti, Alessandra Felici, Paola Papaldo, Alessandra Fabi, Francesco Cognetti. (2007) HER2/neu role in breast cancer: from a prognostic foe to a predictive friend. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 19:1, 56-62
    CrossRef

  138. 138

    L.P. Shulman. (2007) HER2 and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Yearbook of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health 2007, 247-249
    CrossRef

  139. 139

    J.T. Thigpen. (2007) HER2 and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Yearbook of Oncology 2007, 53
    CrossRef

  140. 140

    J.T. Thigpen. (2007) HER2 and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Yearbook of Medicine 2007, 120-121
    CrossRef

  141. 141

    Joyce O'Shaughnessy. (2007) Developments in the systemic therapy of early-stage breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer Supplements 5:1, 3-10
    CrossRef

  142. 142

    Vladimir Baltić. (2007) Application of Genomics in Clinical Oncology. Journal of Medical Biochemistry 26:2, 79-93
    CrossRef

  143. 143

    Marc Salzberg, Beat Th&uuml;rlimann, Ursula Hasler, Geoffrey Delmore, Albert von Rohr, Annatina Th&uuml;rlimann, Thomas Ruhstaller, Shanna Stopatschinskaja, Roger von Moos. (2007) Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Caelyx&reg;) in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Community-Based Observation Study. Oncology 72:3-4, 147-151
    CrossRef

  144. 144

    Preeta Tyagi, G. Kesava Reddy, Walter M. Stadler. (2006) Highlights from: The Third International Congress on Kidney and Bladder Cancer; Orlando, FL; August 3-6, 2006. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer 5:3, 183-186
    CrossRef

  145. 145

    Sathiyamoorthy Selvarajan, Ka Yan Wong, Kei Siong Khoo, Boon Huat Bay, Puay Hoon Tan. (2006) Over-expression of c-erbB-2 correlates with nuclear morphometry and prognosis in breast carcinoma in Asian women. Pathology 38:6, 528-533
    CrossRef

  146. 146

    Levine, Mark N., Whelan, Timothy, . (2006) Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer — 30 Years Later. New England Journal of Medicine 355:18, 1920-1922
    Full Text

  147. 147

    John C. Marshall. (2006) Biomarkers of sepsis. Current Infectious Disease Reports 8:5, 351-357
    CrossRef

  148. 148

    (2006) Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 355:8, 845-846
    Full Text

  149. 149

    (2006) Response to adjuvant chemotherapy is affected by HER2 amplification. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology 3:8, 409-410
    CrossRef

  150. 150

    M. Kaufmann, S. Loibl, A. Rody, G. Minckwitz. (2006) Stadienadaptierte Therapie des Mammakarzinoms. Der Gynäkologe 39:8, 618-626
    CrossRef

  151. 151

    Piccart-Gebhart, Martine J., . (2006) Anthracyclines and the Tailoring of Treatment for Early Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 354:20, 2177-2179
    Full Text

Letters