Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Intracoronary Streptokinase after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Murat Sezer, M.D., Hüseyin Oflaz, M.D., Taner Gören, M.D., İrem Okçular, M.D., Berrin Umman, M.D., Yilmaz Nişanci, M.D., Ahmet Kaya Bilge, M.D., Yasemin Şanli, M.D., Mehmet Meriç, M.D., and Sabahattin Umman, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1823-1834May 3, 2007

Abstract

Background

Microvascular perfusion is often impaired after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We proposed that in situ thrombosis might contribute to poor myocardial perfusion in this setting. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the effect of low-dose intracoronary streptokinase administered immediately after primary PCI.

Methods

Forty-one patients undergoing primary PCI were randomly assigned to receive intracoronary streptokinase (250 kU) or no additional therapy. Two days later, cardiac catheterization was repeated, and coronary hemodynamic end points were measured with the use of a guidewire tipped with pressure and temperature sensors. In patients with anterior myocardial infarction, the deceleration time of coronary diastolic flow was measured with transthoracic echocardiography. At 6 months, angiography, echocardiography, and technetium-99m single-photon-emission computed tomography were performed.

Results

Two days after PCI, all measures of microvascular function (means ±SD) were significantly better in the streptokinase group than in the control group, including coronary flow reserve (2.01±0.57 vs. 1.39±0.31), the index of microvascular resistance (16.29±5.06 U vs. 32.49±11.04 U), the collateral-flow index (0.08±0.05 vs. 0.17±0.07), mean coronary wedge pressure (10.81±5.46 mm Hg vs. 17.20±7.93 mm Hg), systolic coronary wedge pressure (18.24±6.07 mm Hg vs. 33.80±11.00 mm Hg), and diastolic deceleration time (828±258 msec vs. 360±292 msec). The administration of intracoronary streptokinase was also associated with a significantly lower corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count (the number of cine frames required for dye to travel from the ostium of a coronary artery to a standardized distal coronary landmark) at 2 days. At 6 months, however, there was no evidence of a difference between the two study groups in left ventricular size or function.

Conclusions

In our pilot trial, the administration of low-dose intracoronary streptokinase immediately after primary PCI improved myocardial reperfusion but not long-term left ventricular size or function. These findings require clarification in a larger trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00302419.)

Media in This Article

Figure 1Enrollment, Randomization, and Follow-up of Study Patients.
Table 1Baseline Demographic, Clinical, and Angiographic Characteristics.
Article

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an established reperfusion strategy in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation.1 Nevertheless, myocardial damage is not immediately terminated after the elimination of epicardial occlusion with successful primary PCI. It has been presumed that reperfusion injury and embolization of epicardial thrombus and plaque debris jeopardize tissue-level perfusion.2-4 Although thromboembolism of proximal origin may limit microvascular perfusion,5,6 a thrombus may also form in the microvasculature itself. This concept may help explain why recent randomized trials have failed to show a beneficial effect of distal protection devices on microvascular perfusion during primary PCI, despite effective retrieval of thrombus and plaque content from epicardial coronary arteries.7,8

We proposed that the intracoronary infusion of low-dose streptokinase immediately after primary PCI might further improve tissue-level perfusion by dissolving thrombi (either formed in situ or embolic) at the microvascular level. This hypothesis was investigated prospectively in a pilot trial.

Methods

Patients

Patients who had their first ST-segment elevation and were scheduled to undergo primary PCI within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms were considered for trial enrollment. Inclusion criteria were ongoing chest pain, ST-segment elevation on electrocardiography, and occlusion of the infarct-related artery (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade of 0 or 1) on angiography. The main exclusion criteria were the presence of the culprit lesion in a saphenous-vein graft, an additional lesion causing more than 50% narrowing distal to the culprit lesion, or a left bundle-branch block; history of prior myocardial infarction; and contraindications to streptokinase, tirofiban, aspirin, clopidogrel, or heparin. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by our hospital ethics committee.

Study Protocol

Immediately after diagnostic angiography, eligible patients were assigned to either the streptokinase group or the control group (which received no additional therapy) according to a computer-generated random sequence. In both groups, primary PCI was performed with the use of stent implantation after balloon dilation. All patients received 300 mg of aspirin; a loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel; an intracoronary infusion of unfractionated heparin at a dose of 100 U per kilogram of body weight during the procedure; tirofiban as a bolus of 0.1 μg per kilogram 3 minutes after the start of the procedure, followed by continuous infusion of tirofiban at 0.15 μg per kilogram per minute for 12 hours; and low-molecular-weight heparin initiated 4 to 5 hours after primary PCI and continued for at least 48 hours. After PCI, coronary angiography was repeated to assess the corrected TIMI frame count,9 the number of cine frames required for dye to travel from the ostium of a coronary artery to a standardized distal coronary landmark, and the myocardial blush grade.10

In the streptokinase group, immediately after the postprocedure coronary angiography, 250 kU of streptokinase diluted with 20 ml of saline was infused through the guiding catheter for 3 minutes. The control group received no additional treatment. Electrocardiograms were recorded both immediately and 60 minutes after the PCI to assess the resolution of ST-segment deviation.11

The femoral sheath was removed as soon as the activated partial-thromboplastin time was appropriate (first checked 4 hours after the conclusion of the PCI), and hemostasis was achieved by manual compression. During the period of hospitalization, patients were monitored carefully for bleeding at the femoral access site and other bleeding complications. Prespecified medications consisted of 100 mg of aspirin daily for an indefinite period, 75 mg of clopidogrel daily for 1 year, and the maximum tolerated doses of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors if not contraindicated.

Intracoronary Hemodynamic Measurements and Angiographic Analysis

Two days after primary PCI, all patients underwent a second cardiac catheterization for evaluation of microvascular function. Several distinct assessments were performed during this evaluation, including angiography and measurement of intracoronary hemodynamic characteristics.

For the assessment of hemodynamic characteristics, a guidewire tipped with pressure and temperature sensors (PressureWire5 Sensor, Radi Medical Systems) was positioned distal to the stented segment of the infarct-related artery. Papaverine was used as the hyperemic agent. The transit time (in seconds) of room-temperature saline injected into a coronary artery at rest and during hyperemia was measured three times and averaged, as previously described.12 The thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve was calculated as the mean transit time at rest divided by the mean transit time during hyperemia.13 The index of microvascular resistance (in mm Hg–seconds, or units) was defined as the distal coronary pressure multiplied by the mean transit time during hyperemia, measured simultaneously.14 Subsequently, the stented segment was occluded temporarily with a short compliant balloon, and the mean and systolic coronary wedge pressures were recorded. The pressure-derived collateral-flow index was calculated as the ratio of the mean coronary wedge pressure minus the central venous pressure, measured simultaneously, and the mean aortic pressure minus the central venous pressure. For this calculation, central venous pressure was not measured directly but was estimated as 5 mm Hg, as described elsewhere.15 All coronary hemodynamic data were recorded, stored off-line, and analyzed by an independent investigator who was unaware of the group assignments.

Coronary angiography was also performed 2 days after primary PCI. The corrected TIMI frame count and myocardial blush grade were determined from the appropriate angiographic images.

Noninvasive Assessment of Microvascular Perfusion

Two days after primary PCI, the coronary flow-velocity pattern was assessed with the use of transthoracic echocardiography (as previously described16) in patients in whom the infarct-related artery was the left anterior descending coronary artery. The deceleration time of coronary diastolic flow was measured with the use of the coronary flow-velocity spectrum.17

Long-Term Follow-up

Echocardiography, angiography, and technetium-99m–labeled sestamibi single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) were performed 6 months after primary PCI. Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were measured, and the percent changes relative to the values 2 days after PCI were calculated. Patients with 70% or more stenosis in the stented segment on angiography were excluded from the volume analysis at 6 months to avoid the confounding effect of restenosis of the infarct-related artery. TIMI frame count and myocardial blush grade were reassessed on the follow-up angiogram. Technetium-99m–labeled sestamibi SPECT was used to measure infarct size, expressed as a percentage of the total area of the myocardium,18 by a nuclear medicine specialist who was unaware of the group assignments.

Study End Points

We designated several measures as primary end points, including coronary flow reserve, index of microvascular resistance, coronary wedge pressure, collateral-flow index, and coronary diastolic deceleration time. The secondary end points included the corrected TIMI frame count, myocardial blush grade, infarct size, changes in left ventricular volume, and major adverse cardiac events such as reinfarction, revascularization, and death.

Statistical Analysis

Estimated mean values for each of the primary end points were obtained from the published literature. Using GraphPad Instat software, we then calculated the number of patients that would be necessary to detect a difference of 30% between the streptokinase group and the control group for each end point, with an α of 0.05, a β of 0.20, and a statistical power of 0.80. The necessary number of patients ranged from 7 to 39 patients per group, depending on the end point. Therefore, we targeted a sample of 40 patients per group. However, at a preplanned interim analysis (including approximately half the target study sample), significant absolute differences of more than 30% between the two study groups were demonstrated for most of the primary end points (excluding the coronary diastolic deceleration time, which is reported not to have a normal distribution). The decision was therefore made to terminate enrollment.

All statistical tests were performed with SPSS software, version 7.5. Group percentages were compared with the use of the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Group means for variables with normal and nonnormal distributions were compared with the use of Student's t-test for independent groups and the Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. All analyses were repeated for the subgroup of patients with anterior myocardial infarction (in whom the infarct-related artery was the left anterior descending coronary artery). Group means were also adjusted for possible confounding factors (age; time from chest pain that has persisted for 30 minutes to balloon dilation [pain-to-balloon time]; presence or absence of diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, angina before myocardial infarction, slow flow, and side-branch embolization; smoking status; and infarct location) with the use of analysis of covariance. The difference between groups with regard to myocardial blush grade 0 or 1 was first analyzed with the use of the chi-square test and then with a logistic-regression model including age and pain-to-balloon time, in addition to the study-group variable (intracoronary streptokinase or no treatment). Two-tailed P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Study Patients and Angiographic Outcomes

Between October 2004 and March 2006, 41 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either intracoronary streptokinase (21 patients) or no additional treatment (20 patients) (Figure 1Figure 1Enrollment, Randomization, and Follow-up of Study Patients.). Baseline demographic, clinical, and angiographic characteristics are listed in Table 1Table 1Baseline Demographic, Clinical, and Angiographic Characteristics.. There were no significant differences between the two groups. All patients but one were male, and the mean age was 51.8 years.

The infarct-related artery was successfully opened in all patients, each of whom received at least one stent. No major bleeding or groin complications occurred. Minimal bleeding (according to the TIMI bleeding classifications19) was observed at the femoral access site in one patient in each group and was managed with manual compression. During postprocedural assessment, a femoral pseudoaneurysm was detected in one patient in the streptokinase group and was also managed with manual compression.

Assessment of Microcirculation

Intracoronary hemodynamic end points were evaluated at a mean (±SD) of 48±10 hours after primary PCI. Microvascular perfusion was significantly better in the streptokinase group than in the control group with regard to all the primary end points (Table 2Table 2Invasive and Noninvasive Measures of Microvascular Perfusion, According to Type of Analysis.). Coronary flow reserve was significantly greater in the streptokinase group than in the control group (2.01±0.57 vs. 1.39±0.31, adjusted P=0.002). Other end points were significantly lower in the streptokinase group than in the control group: the index of microvascular resistance (16.29±5.06 U vs. 32.49±11.04 U, adjusted P<0.001), collateral-flow index (0.08±0.05 vs. 0.17±0.07, adjusted P=0.002), mean coronary wedge pressure (10.81±5.46 mm Hg vs. 17.20±7.93 mm Hg, adjusted P=0.04), and systolic coronary wedge pressure (18.24±6.07 mm Hg vs. 33.80±11.00 mm Hg, adjusted P<0.001).

The infarct-related artery was the left anterior descending coronary artery in 30 patients. In these patients, the diastolic deceleration time of the recanalized artery was significantly longer in the streptokinase group than in the control group (828±258 msec vs. 360±292 msec, adjusted P=0.001) (Table 2).

Immediately after primary PCI, there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to corrected TIMI frame count or myocardial blush grade. However, at 2 days after PCI, the corrected TIMI frame count was significantly lower in the streptokinase group than in the control group (22.52±5.58 vs. 31.79±7.58, adjusted P=0.001). The myocardial blush grade at 2 days did not differ significantly between the two groups after multivariate adjustment (Table 2).

There was no significant difference between the streptokinase group and the control group with respect to the mean initial ST-segment elevation across all affected leads or the percent resolution of ST-segment deviation immediately after PCI. Sixty minutes after PCI, the percent resolution of ST-segment deviation was higher in the streptokinase group than in the control group, but this difference was not significant after multivariate adjustment (Table 2).

Long-Term Results

Echocardiography, SPECT, and coronary angiography were performed 7.5±2.4 months after primary PCI for purposes of long-term reassessment (Figure 1). Univariate analyses showed that infarct size was smaller, ventricular volumes were less, ejection fraction was higher, and myocardial perfusion was better in the streptokinase group than in the control group (Table 3Table 3Left Ventricular Function at 2 Days and 6 Months and Infarct Size at 6 Months.). However, after multivariate analysis, only the differences between the two groups in the corrected TIMI frame count and in the percent change in end-diastolic volume retained marginal statistical significance.

Major Adverse Cardiac Events and Functional Capacity at Follow-up

In the streptokinase group, one patient underwent surgical revascularization at 2 months and one had reinfarction at 1 month. There was one case of sudden cardiac death in the control group at 4 months. Two patients in the streptokinase group and three patients in the control group underwent PCI owing to hemodynamically significant restenosis at 6 months. All other patients had a functional capacity equivalent to New York Heart Association class I at 6 months.

Discussion

In our pilot trial, primary PCI immediately followed by the intracoronary administration of low-dose streptokinase was compared with standard primary PCI without the use of intracoronary streptokinase. Multiple quantitative end points including coronary flow reserve, collateral-flow index, coronary wedge pressure, and coronary diastolic deceleration time were used to evaluate microvascular integrity.20-22 We also measured the index of microvascular resistance, which has been shown to be a useful variable for direct assessment of microcirculatory function.17,23 On the basis of these assessments, the use of intracoronary streptokinase was associated with better perfusion at the microvascular level.

The extent of microvascular dysfunction has been shown to be an important and independent contributor to subsequent changes in left ventricular geometry and performance.24,25 In our study, however, there was at best limited statistical evidence of a benefit to left ventricular size or function on the basis of long-term follow-up in the streptokinase group. The end points with marginal significance may reflect chance associations, given the number of tests performed. Since trends favoring the streptokinase group were detected, it is possible that the study was underpowered for these analyses. The trial was not originally planned to be large enough to detect differences in long-term outcome, and indeed enrollment was terminated early on the basis of the interim data on microvascular perfusion.

The precise mechanisms underlying myocardial malperfusion after the restoration of epicardial blood flow are likely to be multifactorial. The generation of oxygen free radicals, increased myocardial-cell calcium levels, cellular and interstitial edema, endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction, and thromboembolism have all been proposed.2,26 Injury to the endothelium also promotes a procoagulant milieu. Fibrin and platelet aggregates have been found in the coronary microvasculature of patients who have died of acute myocardial infarction.27 In addition to fibrin formation, red-cell and platelet aggregation also contribute to microvascular occlusion and increased resistance in the microvasculature.

It has been shown that streptokinase inhibits red-cell aggregation and reduces platelet aggregation in vitro.28,29 It has also been shown histopathologically, in an open-chest model of anterior descending artery occlusion and reperfusion, that streptokinase reduces congestion at the site of injury and results in improved perfusion of the microvasculature in severely ischemic myocardium to which blood flow has been restored.30 It is therefore reasonable to assume that intracoronary streptokinase, administered immediately after primary PCI, may improve myocardial perfusion through mechanisms that cannot be invoked by distal protection devices.

We chose a 250-kU dose of streptokinase, which we anticipated would be high enough to induce fibrinolysis at the site of injury yet low enough to limit the risk of hemorrhage. At this dose, intracoronary streptokinase should have a concentration at the site of injury that is 50 times that of the standard dose of intravenous streptokinase (1.5 MU), resulting in a concentration in the systemic circulation that is 6 times less than that of the standard dose. In addition, since our protocol specified the administration of streptokinase after the infarct-related artery is opened, the drug would be expected to arrive at the target site much more quickly than with intravenous use.

Several important limitations of our study should be noted. First, because it was a pilot trial, only 41 patients were enrolled. Confirmation of the results with respect to early microvascular perfusion and clarification of the long-term effects on ventricular size and function will require a much larger trial. Second, since there is no single, uniformly accepted method for evaluating coronary microvascular perfusion, it may be argued that the measures used are not sufficiently sensitive or specific for this disease process. We had hoped to increase the reliability of our results by using multiple measures. Third, although the analysis of coronary hemodynamic measurements was blinded, the measurements were made by angiographers who were aware of the group assignments, so it is not possible to rule out entirely some element of investigator bias in our findings.

Finally, although we did not observe an increase in the rate of bleeding complications in the streptokinase group, the potential risk of adding even a low dose of a thrombolytic agent to an antithrombotic regimen that already includes aspirin, clopidogrel, and tirofiban must be considered. In the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ASSENT-4 PCI) trial, the use of full-dose tenecteplase just before primary PCI was associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage.31 In a smaller trial of PCI facilitated with the use of abciximab, the addition of half-dose reteplase was not associated with a significant reduction in the rate of subsequent ischemic events.32 Therefore, it appears that thrombolytic agents administered before primary PCI confer no discernible benefit at low doses and increase risk at high doses. Although the use of thrombolysis after primary PCI may have distinct effects, the implications of these related trials should be kept in mind.

In conclusion, in our pilot evaluation, primary PCI followed by the administration of low-dose intracoronary streptokinase immediately after the procedure was associated with improved microvascular perfusion, but not with long-term improvement in ventricular size or function, as compared with primary PCI alone. Confirmation of the improvement in microvascular perfusion and clarification of the long-term benefit, if any, will require a much larger trial.

Supported by grants from Istanbul University (BYP-637/03032005) and the Cardiology Support Association.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

We thank Prof. Rian Dişçi, M.D., and Associate Prof. Oktay Özdemir, M.D., for their valuable assistance with the statistical analyses.

Source Information

From the Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Sezer at Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Istanbul, Turkey, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction -- executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:671-719[Erratum, J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1376.]
    CrossRef | Medline

  2. 2

    Prasad A, Gersh BJ. Management of microvascular dysfunction and reperfusion injury. Heart 2005;91:1530-1532
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Kaul S, Ito H. Microvasculature in acute myocardial ischemia. Part II. Evolving concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Circulation 2004;109:310-315
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Sakuma T, Sari I, Goodman CN, Lindner JR, Klibanov AL, Kaul S. Simultaneous integrin alphavbeta3 and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition causes reduction in infarct size in a model of acute coronary thrombosis and primary angioplasty. Cardiovasc Res 2005;66:552-561
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Henriques JP, Zijlstra F, Ottervanger JP, et al. Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1112-1117
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Sakuma T, Leong-Poi H, Fisher NG, Goodman NC, Kaul S. Further insights into the “no-reflow” phenomenon after primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: the role of microthromboemboli. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16:15-21
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Stone GW, Webb J, Cox DA, et al. Distal microcirculatory protection during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;293:1063-1072
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Gick M, Jander N, Bestehorn HP, et al. Randomized evaluation of the effects of filter-based distal protection on myocardial perfusion and infarct size after primary percutaneous catheter intervention in myocardial infarction with and without ST-segment elevation. Circulation 2005;112:1462-1469
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Gibson CM, Murphy SA, Rizzo MJ, et al. The relationship between the TIMI frame count and clinical outcomes after thrombolytic administration. Circulation 1999;99:1945-1950
    Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    van 't Hof AWJ, Liem A, Suryapranata H, Hoorntje JC, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F. Angiographic assessment of myocardial reperfusion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: myocardial blush grade. Circulation 1998;97:2302-2306
    Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Schroder R, Wegscheider K, Schroder K, Dismann R, Meyer-Sabellek W. Extent of early ST segment elevation resolution: a strong predictor of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction and a sensitive measure to compare thrombolytic regimens: a substudy of the International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics (INJECT) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:1657-1664
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Barbato E, Aarnoudse W, Aengevaeren GW, et al. Validation of coronary flow reserve measurements by thermodilution in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2004;25:219-223
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Smith L, Wievegg M, Heyndrickx GR. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: experimental validation. Circulation 2001;104:2003-2006
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation 2003;107:3129-3132[Erratum, Circulation 2003;108:3165.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Billinger M, Kloos P, Eberli FR, Windecker S, Meier B, Seiler C. Physiologically assessed coronary collateral flow and adverse cardiac ischemic events: a follow-up study in 403 patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1545-1550
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Voci P, Testa G, Plaustro G. Imaging of the distal left anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic color Doppler echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:74G-78G
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Iwakura K, Ito H, Kawano S, et al. Assessing myocardial perfusion with the transthoracic Doppler technique in patients with reperfused anterior myocardial infarction: comparison with angiographic, enzymatic and electrocardiographic indices. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1526-1533
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Gibbons RJ, Miller TD, Christian TF. Infarct size measured by single photon emission computed tomographic imaging with (99m)Tc-sestamibi: a measure of the efficacy of therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000;101:101-108
    Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Chesebro JH, Knatterud G, Roberts R, et al. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial, phase I: a comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase -- clinical findings through hospital discharge. Circulation 1987;76:142-154
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Werner GS, Ferrari M, Richartz BM, Gastmann O, Figulla HR. Microvascular dysfunction in chronic total coronary occlusions. Circulation 2001;104:1129-1134
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Pijls NH, Bech GJ, el Gamal MI, et al. Quantification of recruitable coronary collateral blood flow in conscious humans and its potential to predict future ischemic events. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1522-1528
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    de Lemos JA, Warner JJ. New tools for assessing microvascular obstruction in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Heart 2004;90:119-120
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Ng MK, Yeung AC, Fearon WF. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2006;113:2054-2061
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Ragosta M, Camarano G, Kaul S, Powers ER, Sarembock IJ, Gimple LW. Microvascular integrity indicates myocellular viability in patients with recent myocardial infarction: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation 1994;89:2562-2569
    Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Bolognese L, Carrabba N, Parodi G, et al. Impact of microvascular dysfunction on left ventricular remodeling and long-term clinical outcome after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004;109:1121-1126
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Hirsh PD, Hillis LD, Campbell WB, Firth BG, Willerson JT. Release of prostaglandins and thromboxane into the coronary circulation in patients with ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med 1981;304:685-691
    Full Text | Medline

  27. 27

    Frink RJ, Rooney PA Jr, Trowbridge JO, Rose JP. Coronary thrombosis and platelet/fibrin microemboli in death associated with acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1988;59:196-200
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Ben-Ami R, Sheinman G, Yedgar S, et al. Thrombolytic therapy reduces red blood cell aggregation in plasma without affecting intrinsic aggregability. Thromb Res 2002;105:487-492
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Folts JD, Schwartz BS, Kroll MH, Schafer AI. Streptokinase inhibits acute platelet thrombus formation in stenosed dog coronary arteries. Platelets 1991;2:145-152
    CrossRef | Medline

  30. 30

    Woo KS, Armiger LC, White HD, Norris RM. Can streptokinase produce beneficial effects additional to coronary recanalization? Quantitative microvascular analysis of critically injured reperfused myocardium. Microvasc Res 2000;60:8-20
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Treatment Strategy with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ASSENT-4 PCI) Investigators. Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial. Lancet 2006;367:569-578
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Schlotterbeck K, et al. Early administration of reteplase plus abciximab versus abciximab alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction referred for percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:947-954
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (29)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Yaron Arbel, Shmuel Banai, Jessia Benhorin, Ariel Finkelstein, Itzhak Herz, Amir Halkin, Gad Keren, Saul Yedgar, Gershon Barashtein, Shlomo Berliner. (2012) Erythrocyte aggregation as a cause of slow flow in patients of acute coronary syndromes. International Journal of Cardiology 154:3, 322-327
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Michael Magro, Sjoerd T. Nauta, Cihan Simsek, Eric Boersma, Elco van der Heide, Evelyn Regar, Ron T. van Domburg, Felix Zijlstra, Patrick W. Serruys, Robert Jan van Geuns. (2011) Usefulness of the SYNTAX Score to Predict “No Reflow” in Patients Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    C. M. Pedersen, G. Barnes, M. R. Schmidt, H. E. Botker, R. K. Kharbanda, D. E. Newby, N. L. Cruden. (2011) Ischaemia-reperfusion injury impairs tissue plasminogen activator release in man. European Heart Journal
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Jun Li, Hanrui Zhang, Cuihua Zhang. (2011) Role of inflammation in the regulation of coronary blood flow in ischemia and reperfusion: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Bryan G. Schwartz, Robert A. Kloner. (2011) Coronary no reflow. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Cevat Kırma, Ayhan Erkol, Selçuk Pala, Vecih Oduncu, Cihan Dündar, Akın İzgi, Kürşat Tigen, C. Michael Gibson. (2011) Intracoronary bolus-only compared with intravenous bolus plus infusion of tirofiban application in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 79:1, 59-67
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Vijayalakshmi Kunadian, C. Michael Gibson. (2010) Thrombolytics and Myocardial Infarction. Cardiovascular Therapeuticsno-no
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Ronen Jaffe, Alexander Dick, Bradley H. Strauss. (2010) Prevention and Treatment of Microvascular Obstruction-Related Myocardial Injury and Coronary No-Reflow Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3:7, 695-704
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Niels J. Verouden, Joost D.E. Haeck, Wichert J. Kuijt, Karel T. Koch, José P.S. Henriques, Jan Baan, Marije M. Vis, Jan J. Piek, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Robbert J. de Winter. (2010) Early ST-segment recovery after primary percutaneous coronary intervention accurately predicts long-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal 159:6, 1005-1011
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    L Galiuto, L Paraggio, G Liuzzo, AR de Caterina, F Crea. (2010) Predicting the no-reflow phenomenon following successful percutaneous coronary intervention. Biomarkers in Medicine 4:3, 403-420
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Paul W. Armstrong. (2010) Pharmacotherapy: Intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. Nature Reviews Cardiology 7:2, 67-69
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Peter C. Austin, Andrea Manca, Merrick Zwarenstein, David N. Juurlink, Matthew B. Stanbrook. (2010) A substantial and confusing variation exists in handling of baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials: a review of trials published in leading medical journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63:2, 142-153
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Itsik Ben-Dor, Augusto D. Pichard, Ron Waksman. (2010) Combined mechanical and pharmacological approach to a thrombus-containing lesion. Catheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsNA-NA
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Michael A. Morse, Josh W. Todd, George A. Stouffer. (2009) Optimizing the Use of Thrombolytics in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Drugs 69:14, 1945-1966
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Murat Sezer, Arif Çimen, Emre Aslanger, Ali Elitok, Berrin Umman, Zehra Buğra, Ebru Yormaz, Cüneyt Türkmen, I.şık Adalet, Yilmaz Nişanci, Sabahattin Umman. (2009) Effect of Intracoronary Streptokinase Administered Immediately After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Left Ventricular Infarct Size, Volumes, and Function. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 54:12, 1065-1071
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Olivier F. Bertrand, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Éric Larose, Can Manh Nguyen, Jean-Pierre Déry, Guy Proulx, Louis Roy, Paul Poirier, Olivier Costerousse, Robert De Larochellière. (2009) Effects of intracoronary compared to intravenous abciximab administration in patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: A sub-analysis of the EASY trial. International Journal of Cardiology 136:2, 165-170
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Joost DE Haeck, Niels JW Verouden, José PS Henriques, Karel T Koch. (2009) Current status of distal embolization in percutaneous coronary intervention: mechanical and pharmacological strategies. Future Cardiology 5:4, 385-402
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Emanuele Cecchi, Agatina Alessandriello Liotta, Anna Maria Gori, Serafina Valente, Cristina Giglioli, Chiara Lazzeri, Francesco Sofi, Gian Franco Gensini, Rosanna Abbate, Lucia Mannini. (2009) Relationship between blood viscosity and infarct size in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. International Journal of Cardiology 134:2, 189-194
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Hironori Kitabata, Toshio Imanishi, Takashi Kubo, Shigeho Takarada, Manabu Kashiwagi, Hiroki Matsumoto, Hiroto Tsujioka, Hideyuki Ikejima, Yu Arita, Keishi Okochi, Akio Kuroi, Satoshi Ueno, Hideaki Kataiwa, Takashi Tanimoto, Takashi Yamano, Kumiko Hirata, Nobuo Nakamura, Atsushi Tanaka, Masato Mizukoshi, Takashi Akasaka. (2009) Coronary Microvascular Resistance Index Immediately After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as a Predictor of the Transmural Extent of Infarction in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Anterior Acute Myocardial Infarction. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 2:3, 263-272
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Vijayalakshmi Kunadian, Cafer Zorkun, Scott P. Williams, Leah H. Biller, Alexandra M. Palmer, Katherine J. Ogando, Michelle E. Lew, Navin Nethala, William J. Gibson, Susan J. Marble, Jacqueline L. Buros, C. Michael Gibson. (2008) Intracoronary pharmacotherapy in the management of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 26:3, 234-242
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Warren K. Laskey, Sam Yoon, Norberto Calzada, Mark J. Ricciardi. (2008) Concordant improvements in coronary flow reserve and ST-segment resolution during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: A benefit of postconditioning. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 72:2, 212-220
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Simon R. Dixon, Cindy L. Grines, William W. O'Neill. (2008) The Year in Interventional Cardiology. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 51:24, 2355-2369
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    T. Massardo, H. Lavados, R. Jaimovich, E. Herrera, L. Quevedo, L. Alfaro, V. Assef, C. Coll, C. Velásquez, M.E. Pereira, E. Olea, J.C. Quintana. (2008) Correlación interobservadores en interpretación de SPECT de perfusión con 99mTc-sestamibi en infarto agudo de miocardio reperfundido. Revista Española de Medicina Nuclear 27:2, 83-89
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Giuseppe De Luca, Harry Suryapranata, Paolo Marino. (2008) Reperfusion Strategies in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Overview of Current Status. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 50:5, 352-382
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Smriti Saraf, Paul Ong, Diana Gorog. (2008) ClearWay™ RX - Rapid exchange therapeutic perfusion catheter. EuroIntervention 3:5, 639-642
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    William F. Fearon, Maulik Shah, Martin Ng, Todd Brinton, Andrew Wilson, Jennifer A. Tremmel, Ingela Schnittger, David P. Lee, Randall H. Vagelos, Peter J. Fitzgerald, Paul G. Yock, Alan C. Yeung. (2008) Predictive Value of the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 51:5, 560-565
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Andrea Picchi, Valerio Zacà, Andrea Picchi, Valerio Zacà, Marta Focardi, Massimo Fineschi, Giuseppe Sinicropi, Stefano Casini, Alberto Buti, Carlo Pierli, Sergio Mondillo, Mario Marzilli. (2008) Beneficial effect of post-procedural abciximab in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty and presenting with the no-reflow phenomenon. Acute Cardiac Care 10:2, 100-103
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    P. J. M. M. Toll’s-Hertogenbosch. (2007) Intracoronair streptokinase na percutane coronaire interventie. MFM 45:10, 317-317
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Piek, Jan J., . (2007) Beyond Epicardial Reperfusion. New England Journal of Medicine 356:18, 1880-1882
    Full Text