Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Azithromycin for the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Events

J. Thomas Grayston, M.D., Richard A. Kronmal, Ph.D., Lisa A. Jackson, M.D., Alfred F. Parisi, M.D., Joseph B. Muhlestein, M.D., Jerome D. Cohen, M.D., William J. Rogers, M.D., John R. Crouse, M.D., Sandra L. Borrowdale, M.S., Eleanor Schron, M.S., and Charles Knirsch, M.D. for the ACES Investigators

N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1637-1645April 21, 2005

Abstract

Background

Epidemiologic, laboratory, animal, and clinical studies suggest that there is an association between Chlamydia pneumoniae infection and atherogenesis. We evaluated the efficacy of one year of azithromycin treatment for the secondary prevention of coronary events.

Methods

In this randomized, prospective trial, we assigned 4012 patients with documented stable coronary artery disease to receive either 600 mg of azithromycin or placebo weekly for one year. The participants were followed for a mean of 3.9 years at 28 clinical centers throughout the United States.

Results

The primary end point, a composite of death due to coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina, occurred in 446 of the participants who had been randomly assigned to receive azithromycin and 449 of those who had been randomly assigned to receive placebo. There was no significant risk reduction in the azithromycin group as compared with the placebo group with regard to the primary end point (risk reduction, 1 percent [95 percent confidence interval, –13 to 13 percent]). There were also no significant risk reductions with regard to any of the components of the primary end point, death from any cause, or stroke. The results did not differ when the participants were stratified according to sex, age, smoking status, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus, or C. pneumoniae serologic status at baseline.

Conclusions

A one-year course of weekly azithromycin did not alter the risk of cardiac events among patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Kaplan–Meier Curves Representing the Cumulative Rate of the Primary End Point, According to Study Group.
Figure 2Risk of the Primary End Point Associated with Azithromycin Treatment, Stratified According to Baseline Characteristics Considered to Be Coronary Risk Factors.
Article

An association between Chlamydia pneumoniae and atherosclerosis, originally suggested by seroepidemiologic studies,1,2 was confirmed by a series of investigations demonstrating the presence of the organism in atherosclerotic lesions by four different methods.3-6 The etiologic or pathogenic significance of this association needs to be determined. Through basic-science studies of possible mechanisms and animal-model studies of atherosclerosis, data on the role of C. pneumoniae in atherosclerosis have accumulated.7,8

The presence of C. pneumoniae in atherosclerotic lesions raises the possibility that antibiotic treatment might have a favorable effect on the course of coronary heart disease. A trial of antibiotic treatment in humans would be justified because of the public health importance of coronary heart disease. Moreover, it should be safe for the participants. Prior studies of both short- and long-term administration of macrolide antibiotics, including azalides, have shown few adverse reactions.9,10 Chlamydiae have not developed resistance against macrolide antibiotics, but long-term antibiotic therapy could contribute to resistance in other organisms. However, the risk that resistant bacteria might emerge during the trial was offset by the current practice among some physicians of providing antibiotic treatment for coronary heart disease in the absence of any established benefit.11

Methods

Study Population

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 28 centers in the United States. Men and women 18 years of age or older who had documented, stable coronary heart disease (defined as a previous myocardial infarction documented on the basis of enzyme-related criteria, angiographic evidence of at least 50 percent stenosis of a coronary artery, or previous coronary revascularization) were eligible. Patients were excluded if during the preceding three months they had had a myocardial infarction, undergone coronary revascularization, or been hospitalized for unstable angina. Additional reasons for exclusion were severe cardiac disease (New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure or stage III or IV angina), allergy to macrolide antibiotics, clinically significant renal or hepatic dysfunction, cancer, ongoing antibiotic therapy, or immunosuppression. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Treatment and Follow-up

Patients were enrolled in the Azithromycin and Coronary Events Study (ACES) between April 1999 and May 2000, and follow-up concluded on December 31, 2003. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either a 600-mg azithromycin tablet or a matching placebo tablet once weekly for one year. Azithromycin was chosen for treatment because of its proven efficacy against chlamydial infection and its long intracellular half-life, which allowed once-weekly dosing. Participants and all site investigators remained blinded to the treatment assignment through the end of follow-up and data collection.

Participants were interviewed in person or by telephone 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment to identify adverse events and study outcomes and to ascertain their compliance with the study medication. After the first year, participants were interviewed approximately every six months until the end of follow-up to identify outcomes.

End Points

The primary end point was a composite of the first occurrence of any of the following: death due to coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, a percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization procedure, or hospitalization for unstable angina. The members of a clinical end-point committee, who were blinded to the treatment-group assignment, adjudicated the end points. Two committee members adjudicated each end point separately, and if there was disagreement, a third member resolved the difference.

Myocardial infarction was defined by hospitalization with a clinical syndrome compatible with infarction and either the development of a new pathologic Q wave or diagnostic elevations in the creatine kinase MB level (or troponin level if creatine kinase MB results were not available) above the upper limit of normal for the treating institution. It was also diagnosed in patients resuscitated after cardiac collapse with creatine kinase MB or troponin levels greater than the upper limit of the normal range. Myocardial infarction was also diagnosed according to the following criteria in patients who had undergone revascularization: within the first 48 hours after coronary bypass surgery in patients with creatine kinase MB levels greater than five times the upper limit of the normal range; within the first 48 hours after percutaneous revascularization in those with creatine kinase MB levels greater than three times the upper limit of the normal range; and after 48 hours in those who had undergone either procedure and had creatine kinase MB or troponin levels above the upper limit of the normal range.

Unstable angina was defined by hospitalization for new chest pain or changes in the patient's usual chest pain in combination with electrocardiographic ST-T wave changes indicative of ischemia or accompanied by elevations in enzyme markers not diagnostic of myocardial infarction.

Death due to coronary heart disease was defined as death believed to be the consequence of coronary atherosclerotic disease or death not definitively known to be due to a noncoronary cause. Death from cardiac causes included death due to arrhythmias, severe congestive heart failure, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction. Unwitnessed sudden death in the absence of a noncoronary cause was assumed to be death from coronary heart disease. Death within 30 days after coronary revascularization was considered to be due to coronary heart disease, unless another cause unrelated to the procedure or to coronary disease was clearly identified.

Components of the primary end point were analyzed separately. Predefined secondary end points included stroke, cardiac collapse followed by resuscitation, carotid endarterectomy, peripheral revascularization, and death from any cause. Participants who had a nonfatal event were followed to the end of the trial so that the total rate of the individual events constituting the primary end point could be compared between the treatment groups.

Laboratory Tests

Blood specimens were obtained from all participants at enrollment. They were tested for the presence of C. pneumoniae antibody in the IgG and IgA serum fractions by the microimmunofluorescence test12 and for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Statistical Analysis

Calculations

In the calculation of the sample size, it was assumed that the rate of the primary end point would be 6.5 percent per year in the placebo group, on the basis of previous trials. With the use of this estimate, the planned sample size of 4000, with an average follow-up of 4.0 years, allowed 98 percent power to detect a 25 percent reduction and 85 percent power to detect a 20 percent reduction in the rate of the primary end point at a two-sided significance level of 0.05.

Data analyses were based on an intention-to-treat approach. In the primary analysis, the time to the primary end point in the azithromycin group was compared with that in the placebo group with use of the log-rank test. Components of the primary end point and secondary end points were similarly analyzed. Participants' data were censored on the date of the last contact or the date of death. Final visits occurred within a three-month period from October 1 through December 31, 2003. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to compute hazard ratios and the percent risk reduction [100 × (1 – the hazard ratio)]. The curve representing the cumulative rate of the primary end point was estimated by the product-limit (Kaplan–Meier) method.

Safety Monitoring and Stopping Guidelines

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute appointed an independent data and safety monitoring board. The study was conducted under an investigational-new-drug application with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The institutional review board at each site approved the protocol.

The data and safety monitoring board monitored the study for safety and efficacy. To preserve the overall type I error, a group sequential approach was used to determine interim monitoring boundaries for stopping the trial owing to a demonstration of the superiority of azithromycin over placebo with use of the log-rank test. Planned interim analyses were performed when approximately one quarter, one half, and three quarters of the expected number of events had occurred, at significance levels of 0.0017, 0.0020, and 0.0023. At each interim analysis, the data and safety monitoring board voted unanimously to continue the study.

Dr. Grayston designed the study with the assistance of Drs. Kronmal and Jackson. The data gathered at the 28 sites (listed in the Appendix) were collected and evaluated at Axio Research, under the direction of Ms. Borrowdale. Dr. Kronmal analyzed the data with assistance from Drs. Grayston and Jackson. Dr. Grayston and all the authors vouch for the data and the analysis. All the authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript, under the direction of Dr. Grayston.

Results

ACES enrolled 4012 patients; 2004 were randomly assigned to the azithromycin group and 2008 to the placebo group. Of those enrolled, one in the azithromycin group and two in the placebo group did not receive any study drug. Table 1Table 1Baseline Characteristics of Participants in ACES, According to Study Group. shows the characteristics of the participants at enrollment. Fifty-six percent of the participants had had a myocardial infarction, and 89 percent had undergone a coronary revascularization procedure. Twenty-nine percent reported angina at rest, 28 percent had angina only on exertion, and 12 percent had congestive heart failure.

Only 86 of the participants (2 percent) withdrew consent or were lost to follow-up. They were divided approximately equally between the azithromycin group (44 participants) and the placebo group (42 participants). Ninety-seven percent of 45,363 scheduled follow-up visits were successfully completed. The median length of observation was 3.91 years in the azithromycin group and 3.92 years in the placebo group. Eighty-eight percent of the participants in the azithromycin group and 93 percent of those in the placebo group completed the one-year period of weekly treatment.

The frequency of the primary end point was 22.3 percent in the azithromycin group and 22.4 percent in the placebo group. There was a reduction of 1 percent in the risk of the primary end point in the azithromycin group (95 percent confidence interval, –13 to 13 percent). The curve representing the cumulative rate of the primary end point in each of the two groups over time is presented in Figure 1Figure 1Kaplan–Meier Curves Representing the Cumulative Rate of the Primary End Point, According to Study Group..

The proportion of participants with each of the individual events contributing to the primary end point is shown in Table 2Table 2Proportion of Participants with Each Event Contributing to the Primary End Point, According to Event and Study Group.. There was no significant difference between the azithromycin group and the placebo group in the frequency of any individual event. Table 3Table 3Proportion of Participants with Primary or Secondary End-Point Events, According to Type of Event and Study Group. shows the frequency of all of the primary and secondary outcome events throughout the study, regardless of whether they occurred after the participant had a prior event. Again, there was no difference between the groups with respect to the frequency of primary or secondary end-point events.

Subgroup analyses of the primary end point according to individual baseline characteristics considered to be coronary risk factors are shown in Figure 2Figure 2Risk of the Primary End Point Associated with Azithromycin Treatment, Stratified According to Baseline Characteristics Considered to Be Coronary Risk Factors.. In these analyses, there were no significant differences between the azithromycin group and the placebo group in the risk of the primary end point. There was also no difference between the groups when other baseline characteristics, including angina at rest, angina on exertion, prior revascularization, and prior myocardial infarction were analyzed.

C. pneumoniae antibody status was determined by testing blood specimens obtained at enrollment. Twenty percent of the participants did not have antibody in the IgG serum fraction, and two thirds did not have IgA antibody. Neither IgG antibody nor IgA antibody was significantly associated with the risk of the primary end point in either the azithromycin or placebo group.

Symptoms reported by participants during interviews at intervals during the year of treatment and the number of participants who reported seeking medical care for these symptoms are shown in Table 4Table 4Symptoms Reported by Participants during the One-Year Treatment Period.. Clinical or laboratory follow-up data on the reported symptoms were not obtained. Although participants assigned to receive placebo reported gastrointestinal symptoms with some frequency, these symptoms were more common among those assigned to receive azithromycin. However, participants who received placebo sought medical care for gastrointestinal symptoms as frequently as did those receiving azithromycin.

Hearing loss was reported more frequently in the azithromycin group. Hearing loss was included among the symptoms discussed during the interviews because of case reports of reversible hearing loss in patients treated with high doses of azithromycin for Mycobacterium avium complex infection.13,14 Only 12 of the participants reporting hearing loss sought medical care. Two of these participants, both in the placebo group, discontinued the weekly medication (one permanently and one temporarily). Of all the participants reporting hearing loss who either permanently or temporarily stopped taking their assigned medication, six were from the azithromycin group and six were from the placebo group.

Vaginal candidiasis was included among the symptoms discussed during the interviews, because it may be a side effect of long-term antibiotic treatment. Surprisingly, the symptom was more common in the placebo group, and all 12 of the women who reported receiving more than one course of treatment were from the placebo group. Thirty-four serious adverse events (12 in the azithromycin group and 22 in the placebo group) not included in Table 4 were reported to the FDA because a relation to the treatment could not be ruled out.

Discussion

This trial found that one year of weekly azithromycin therapy was not associated with any clinically significant benefit in the secondary prevention of coronary events. Azithromycin was associated with mild gastrointestinal symptoms. There was a greater number of reports of hearing loss in the azithromycin group, but the available data did not allow clarification of the clinical significance of these reports. More frequent vaginitis was reported in the placebo group, which is the opposite of the expected effect of long-term antibiotic treatment. It is possible that azithromycin provided therapy against bacterial vaginosis, but clinical or laboratory diagnostic data were not available.

Nine other clinical trials testing antibiotics for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease have been published.15 Of these, only the WIZARD (Weekly Intervention with Zithromax for Atherosclerosis and Its Related Disorders) trial16 was adequately powered to give a definite result. The others may be considered pilot trials because of their small sizes and short observation periods. Another deficit of most of the trials was their short treatment periods. Approximately equal numbers of the trials were reported to be positive and reported to be negative. In the WIZARD trial, azithromycin treatment was given once weekly for three months. Its results were similar to the findings of ACES, in that they also failed to support the use of antibiotic therapy for coronary heart disease. The WIZARD trial did report some antibiotic protection from events during the first six months of the trial — a result not seen in ACES.

The ACES protocol required participants to have established coronary heart disease that had been stable for at least three months. Review of the study population revealed that 89 percent of patients had undergone at least one coronary revascularization procedure before the study and that more than half had angina. Most of the participants were receiving vigorous standard treatment for coronary heart disease. Events occurring during the trial might reasonably be attributed to destabilization and rupture of plaques, rather than extension of the atherosclerotic process with vessel narrowing.

What do the findings of the trial tell us about the association between C. pneumoniae and atherosclerosis? Assuming that treatment was adequate, they suggest that neither C. pneumoniae nor another organism susceptible to azithromycin plays an important role in events associated with late-stage coronary heart disease. However, since ACES was not designed to study the role of C. pneumoniae in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, the results of the trial do not tell us anything about a possible pathogenic role of C. pneumoniae in the early development or acceleration of atherosclerosis.

There have been clinical trials of antibiotic therapy directed at atherosclerotic changes in the carotid artery, peripheral arteries, and the aorta.17-20 These trials were based on noninvasive measurements of changes in the arterial wall. They did not rely on analyses of events, but measurements in the arterial wall in each subject were included in the analysis. Each trial reported that antibiotic therapy had a significantly favorable effect on the progression of disease. These positive results must be considered preliminary. However, if they can be repeated in studies with larger numbers of subjects, they will offer evidence suggesting that C. pneumoniae is involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic occlusive disease.

The limited data available from antibiotic treatment of atherosclerosis in animal models have shown that if the antibiotic is given shortly after the C. pneumoniae is inoculated into the lung of the animal, the effect of C. pneumoniae on the acceleration of atherosclerosis is greatly reduced or eliminated. If the antibiotic is given later, there is much less or no reduction in the acceleration of atherosclerosis caused by C. pneumoniae.21-23

Our study has several limitations, including the advanced stage of disease (described above), the possibility that the antibiotic does not reach the microorganism in the chronic lesions of atherosclerosis, the possibility that the treatment was not continued long enough or that the dose of antibiotic given was too small, and the possibility that the antibiotic was not sufficiently effective against C. pneumoniae. These limitations do not, for practical purposes, weaken the basic conclusion of this study that antibiotic treatment cannot be recommended for the treatment of chronic coronary heart disease.

This recommendation is confirmed by the results of the PROVE IT (the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy) trial, reported elsewhere in this issue of the Journal.24 PROVE IT did not find any significant protection from coronary events with antibiotic treatment. There were important differences between the PROVE IT trial and ACES. A different class of antibiotic, a new fluoroquinolone (gatifloxacin), was used in PROVE IT. The treatment schedule, though also prolonged, was intermittent, consisting of a 10-day course of therapy each month for a mean of 2 years. Moreover, the participants were recruited at the time of an acute coronary syndrome, and they were younger and had had less previous treatment for coronary heart disease than those in ACES. These differences broaden and strengthen the recommendation against antibiotic treatment for coronary heart disease that can be made on the basis of the ACES trial.

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the European Society of Cardiology, Munich, August 30, 2004, and at the meeting of the European Society for Chlamydia Research, Budapest, Sept. 2, 2004.

Supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Pfizer.

Dr. Grayston reports having received grant support from Pfizer for ACES. Dr. Parisi reports having equity ownership in Pfizer. Dr. Crouse reports having received consulting fees and grant support from Pfizer. Dr. Knirsch is employed by Pfizer and reports having equity interest in the company.

Source Information

From the Departments of Epidemiology (J.T.G., L.A.J.) and Biostatistics (R.A.K.), University of Washington, Seattle; the Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle (L.A.J.); Miriam Hospital, Providence, R.I. (A.F.P.); LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City (J.B.M.); Saint Louis University Medical Center, St. Louis (J.D.C.); University of Alabama, Birmingham (W.J.R.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (J.R.C.); Axio Research, Seattle (S.L.B.); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md. (E.S.); and Pfizer, New York (C.K.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Grayston at the Department of Epidemiology, Box 357236, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

The Azithromycin and Coronary Events Study (ACES) investigators are listed in the Appendix.

Appendix

The ACES investigators are as follows: Core investigators: J.T. Grayston (principal investigator), L.A. Jackson (deputy director), R. Kronmal (biostatistician), and W.J. Kennedy (consultant), University of Washington, Seattle. Investigators at clinical sites: S. Ghaffari, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland; E.G.V. Giardina, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York; J. Varghese, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.; L.A. Jackson, Group Health, Seattle; W. Kussmaul, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia; M. Alam, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit; E. Caracciolo, Hospital of St. Raphael, New Haven, Conn.; J.B. Muhlestein, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City; A.F. Parisi, Miriam Hospital, Providence, R.I.; D. Vorchheimer, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York; M. Gheorghiade, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago; J.B. Kostis, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, N.J.; H. Valantine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif.; J.D. Cohen, Saint Louis University, St. Louis; P.F. Cohn, State University of New York, Stony Brook; W.J. Rogers, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham; G.A. Ewy, University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center, Tucson; C.R. Conti, University of Florida, Gainesville; R.M. Benitez, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore; B. Hunninghake, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; S.C. Smith, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; M.B. Elam, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis; R. O'Rourke, University of Texas, San Antonio; M. Corson, University of Washington, Seattle; J.R. Crouse, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C.; R. Krone, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis; J.P. O'Bryan, Southwest Florida Heart Group, Fort Myers; and G. Albin and A.C. Chiu, St. Mary's/Duluth Clinic Health System, Duluth, Minn. Data coordinating center: Axio Research, Seattle; S.L. Borrowdale (project director), P. Butler (project coordinator), A. Diaz (project coordinator), and R. Nordfors (programmer). Executive committee: S.L. Borrowdale, J. Cohen, J. Thomas Grayston (chair), L.A. Jackson, R. Kronmal, J. B. Muhlestein, A.F. Parisi, W.J. Rogers, and E. Schron. End-point–adjudication committee: R.M. Benitez, E. Caracciolo, J.R. Crouse (chair), M. Gheorghiade, R. Krone, M.A. Lauer, A.F. Parisi, and D. Vorchheimer. Central laboratory: University of Vermont, Colchester; R. Tracy, E. Cornell, and N. Jenny. Chlamydia laboratory: C.C. Kuo and L. Campbell, Department of Pathobiology, University of Washington, Seattle. Data safety and monitoring board: E. Alderman (chair), J. T. Bigger, G. Byrne, A. Curtis, M. Foulkes, T.C. Quinn, R.M. Robertson, and J.T. Sumersgill. Medical monitor: K. Gupta.

References

References

  1. 1

    Saikku P, Leinonen M, Mattila K, et al. Serological evidence of an association of a novel Chlamydia, TWAR, with chronic coronary heart disease and acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1988;2:983-986
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Thom DH, Grayston JT, Siscovick DS, Wang SP, Weiss NS, Daling JR. Association of prior infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae and angiographically demonstrated coronary artery disease. JAMA 1992;268:68-72
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Kuo CC, Shor A, Campbell LA, Fukushi H, Patton DL, Grayston JT. Demonstration of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries. J Infect Dis 1993;167:841-849
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Kuo CC, Grayston JT, Campbell LA, Goo YA, Wissler RW, Benditt EP. Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR) in coronary arteries of young adults (15-34 years old). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:6911-6914
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Jackson LA, Campbell LA, Kuo CC, Rodriguez DI, Lee A, Grayston JT. Isolation of Chlamydia pneumoniae from a carotid endarterectomy specimen. J Infect Dis 1997;176:292-295
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Pathological evidence of association. In: Fong IW. Infections and the cardiovascular system: new perspectives. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2003:139-44.

  7. 7

    Biological mechanisms and animal models. In: Fong IW. Infections and the cardiovascular system: new perspectives. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2003:144-9.

  8. 8

    Grayston JT. Background and current knowledge of Chlamydia pneumoniae and atherosclerosis. J Infect Dis 2000;181:Suppl 3:S402-S410
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Havlir DV, Dube MP, Sattler FR, et al. Prophylaxis against disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex with weekly azithromycin, daily rifabutin, or both. N Engl J Med 1996;335:392-398
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Pierce M, Crampton S, Henry D, et al. A randomized trial of clarithromycin as prophylaxis against disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection in patients with advanced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 1996;335:384-391
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Gimenez-Sanchez F, Butler JC, Jernigan DB, et al. Treating cardiovascular disease with antimicrobial agents: a survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practices among physicians in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:171-176
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Wang SP. The microimmunofluorescence test for Chlamydia pneumoniae infection: technique and interpretation. J Infect Dis 2000;181:Suppl 3:S421-S425
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Wallace MR, Miller LK, Nguyen M-T, Shields AR. Ototoxicity with azithromycin. Lancet 1994;343:241-241
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Tseng AL, Dolovich L, Salit IE. Azithromycin-related ototoxicity in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:76-77
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Grayston JT. Antibiotic treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2003;107:1228-1230
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    O'Connor CM, Dunne MW, Pfeffer MA, et al. Azithromycin for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease events: the WIZARD study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290:1459-1466
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Mosorin M, Juvonen J, Biancari F, et al. Use of doxycycline to decrease the growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. J Vasc Surg 2001;34:606-610
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Vammen S, Lindholt JS, Ostergaard L, Fasting H, Henneberg EW. Randomized double-blind controlled trial of roxithromycin for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion. Br J Surg 2001;88:1066-1072[Erratum, Br J Surg 2002;89:120-1.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Wiesli P, Czerwenka W, Meniconi A, et al. Roxithromycin treatment prevents progression of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in Chlamydia pneumoniae seropositive men: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation 2002;105:2646-2652
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Sander D, Winbeck K, Klingelhofer J, Etgen T, Conrad B. Reduced progression of early carotid atherosclerosis after antibiotic treatment and Chlamydia pneumoniae seropositivity. Circulation 2002;106:2428-2433
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Muhlestein JB, Anderson JL, Hammond EH, et al. Infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae accelerates the development of atherosclerosis and treatment with azithromycin prevents it in a rabbit model. Circulation 1998;97:633-636
    Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Rothstein NM, Quinn TC, Madico G, Gaydos CA, Lowenstein CJ. Effect of azithromycin on murine arteriosclerosis exacerbated by Chlamydia pneumoniae. J Infect Dis 2001;183:232-238
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Fong IW, Chiu B, Viira E, Jang D, Mahony JB. Influence of clarithromycin on early atherosclerotic lesions after Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in a rabbit model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:2321-2326
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Antibiotic treatment of Chlamydia pneumoniae after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1646-1654
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (69)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Lorne M. Golub, Robert A. Greenwald. (2011) Clinical applications of non-antibacterial tetracyclines. Part II. Pharmacological Research 64:6, 549-550
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    M. N. Chahine, J. Deniset, E. Dibrov, S. Hirono, D. P. Blackwood, J. A. Austria, G. N. Pierce. (2011) Oxidized LDL promotes the mitogenic actions of Chlamydia pneumoniae in vascular smooth muscle cells. Cardiovascular Research 92:3, 476-483
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Esther S.H. Kim, Thomas P. Carrigan, Venu Menon. (2011) International Participation in Cardiovascular Randomized Controlled Trials Sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:7, 671-676
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Naveed Adoni, Ghassan Abusaid, Ken Fujise. 2011. Inflammation and Heart Diseases. .
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    M. E. Rosenfeld, L. A. Campbell. (2011) Pathogens and atherosclerosis: Update on the potential contribution of multiple infectious organisms to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 106:5, 858-867
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Justin F. Deniset, Grant N. Pierce. (2010) Possibilities for therapeutic interventions in disrupting Chlamydophila pneumoniae involvement in atherosclerosis. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 24:5, 607-617
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Gregory J. Del Zoppo, Philip B. Gorelick. (2010) Innate inflammation as the common pathway of risk factors leading to TIAs and stroke. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1207:1, 8-10
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Mitchell S. V. Elkind. (2010) Impact of innate inflammation in population studies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1207:1, 97-106
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Baharak Moshiree, Renee McDonald, Wei Hou, Phillip P. Toskes. (2010) Comparison of the Effect of Azithromycin Versus Erythromycin on Antroduodenal Pressure Profiles of Patients with Chronic Functional Gastrointestinal Pain and Gastroparesis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 55:3, 675-683
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Satoru Ohshima, Shinichiro Fujimoto, Artiom Petrov, Hironori Nakagami, Nezam Haider, Jun Zhou, Nobuhiro Tahara, Mariana Kiomy Osako, Ai Fujimoto, Jie Zhu, Toyoaki Murohara, D. Scott Edwards, Navneet Narula, Nathan D. Wong, Y. Chandrashekhar, Ryuichi Morishita, Jagat Narula. (2010) Effect of an Antimicrobial Agent on Atherosclerotic Plaques. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 55:12, 1240-1249
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Gorm B Jensen, Jørgen Hilden, Bodil Als-Nielsen, Morten Damgaard, Jørgen Fischer Hansen, Stig Hansen, Olav H Helø, Per Hildebrandt, Jens Kastrup, Hans Jørn Kolmos, Erik Kjøller, Inga Lind, Henrik Nielsen, Lars Petersen, Christian M Jespersen, Christian Gluud. (2010) Statin Treatment Prevents Increased Cardiovascular and All-Cause Mortality Associated With Clarithromycin in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 55:2, 123-128
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Carlo Contini, Silva Seraceni, Rosario Cultrera, Massimiliano Castellazzi, Enrico Granieri, Enrico Fainardi. (2010) Chlamydophila pneumoniae Infection and Its Role in Neurological Disorders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases 2010, 1-18
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Anna M. Lundberg, Göran K. Hansson. (2010) Innate immune signals in atherosclerosis. Clinical Immunology 134:1, 5-24
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Jean M Larson, Anna Tavakkoli, Walter E Drane, Phillip P Toskes, Baharak Moshiree. (2010) Advantages of Azithromycin Over Erythromycin in Improving the Gastric Emptying Half-Time in Adult Patients With Gastroparesis. Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 16:4, 407
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Shepard D. Weiner, LeRoy E. Rabbani. (2010) Secondary prevention strategies for coronary heart disease. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 29:1, 8-24
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Ahad Eshraghian, Seyed Ali Hashemi, Alireza Hamidian Jahromi, Hamed Eshraghian, Seyed Masoum Masoompour, Mohamad Ali Davarpanah, Kavus Eshraghian, Seyed Alireza Taghavi. (2009) Helicobacter pylori Infection as a Risk Factor for Insulin Resistance. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 54:9, 1966-1970
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Viviane Z. Rocha, Peter Libby. (2009) Obesity, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Nature Reviews Cardiology 6:6, 399-409
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    F J. Nieto. (2009) Commentary: Understanding the pathophysiology of poverty. International Journal of Epidemiology 38:3, 787-790
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Claudio Napoli, Francesco Cacciatore. (2009) Novel Pathogenic Insights in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 51:6, 503-523
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    J. M. Kern, V. Maass, M. Maass. (2009) Molecular pathogenesis of chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection: a brief overview. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 15:1, 36-41
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Alan H. B. Wu. (2009) Etiologies of troponin elevation in critically ill patients with gastrointestinal bleeding*. Critical Care Medicine 37:1, 347-348
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    F. Blasi, P. Tarsia, S. Aliberti. (2009) Chlamydophila pneumoniae. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 15:1, 29-35
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Anna Oksaharju, Jani Lappalainen, Anita M. Tuomainen, Pirkko J. Pussinen, Mirja Puolakkainen, Petri T. Kovanen, Ken A. Lindstedt. (2009) Pro-atherogenic lung and oral pathogens induce an inflammatory response in human and mouse mast cells. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 13:1, 103-113
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Tatjana Grdanoska. (2008) <i>Chlamydia pneumoniae</i> and Heart Desease. Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 1:2, 49-53
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    M. HÖGDAHL, G. SÖDERLUND, E. KIHLSTRÖM. (2008) Expression of chemokines and adhesion molecules in human coronary artery endothelial cells infected with Chlamydia (Chlamydophila) pneumoniae  . APMIS 116:12, 1082-1088
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Shaoshan S. Wang, A. Maziar Zafari. (2008) In search for a reliable assay to detect vascular infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae. International Journal of Cardiology 130:2, 262-263
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Turgay Celik, Atila Iyisoy, Murat Celik, Ersoy Isik. (2008) The ongoing debate over the association between Chlamydia pneumoniae infection and coronary artery disease: Antibiotic dilemma. International Journal of Cardiology 130:2, 260-261
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Enrique Villegas, Ana Camacho, Jose Antonio Carrillo, Antonio Sorlózano, José Rojas, José Gutiérrez. (2008) Emerging strategies in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of Chlamydophila pneumoniae infections. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 18:10, 1175-1189
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Zhi Song, Paul Brassard, James M. Brophy. (2008) A meta-analysis of antibiotic use for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 24:5, 391-395
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Bojan Cercek. (2008) Increased Risk of Mortality following Antibiotic Treatment in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease?. Cardiology 111:4, 277-279
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    José Manuel Fernández-Real, John C. Pickup. (2008) Innate immunity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 19:1, 10-16
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Prediman K. Shah. 2008. Inflammation and atherothrombosis. , 1013-1021.
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Dean A Follmann. 2007. Primary Efficacy Endpoint. .
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Stephan J. Ott, Nour Eddine El Mokhtari, Ateequr Rehman, Philip Rosenstiel, Stephan Hellmig, Tanja Kühbacher, Markus Lins, Rüdiger Simon, Stefan Schreiber. (2007) Fungal rDNA signatures in coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Environmental Microbiology 9:12, 3035-3045
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Zhong-qun Yan, Göran K. Hansson. (2007) Innate immunity, macrophage activation, and atherosclerosis. Immunological Reviews 219:1, 187-203
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Terttu Tiirola, Juha Sinisalo, Markku S. Nieminen, Sylvi Silvennoinen-Kassinen, Mika Paldanius, Pekka Saikku, Matti Jauhiainen, Maija Leinonen. (2007) Chlamydial lipopolysaccharide is present in serum during acute coronary syndrome and correlates with CRP levels. Atherosclerosis 194:2, 403-407
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Robert N. Foley. (2007) Infections in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 21:3, 659-672
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    B. Piechowski-Jóźwiak, A. Mickielewicz, Z. Gaciong, H. Berent, H. Kwieciński. (2007) Elevated levels of anti-Chlamydia pneumoniae IgA and IgG antibodies in young adults with ischemic stroke. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 116:3, 144-149
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Stefan Frantz, Georg Ertl, Johann Bauersachs. (2007) Mechanisms of Disease: Toll-like receptors in cardiovascular disease. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine 4:8, 444-454
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Cynthia M. Westerhout, Judy Gnarpe, Wei-Ching Chang, Susan FitzPatrick, Elliot S. Barnathan, Eric Boersma, Robert M. Califf, Lars Wallentin, Maarten L. Simoons, Paul W. Armstrong. (2007) No prognostic significance of chronic infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae in acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the Global Utilization of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries IV Acute Coronary Syndromes trial. American Heart Journal 154:2, 306-312
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Shaoshan S. Wang, Maria Lucia C. Tondella, Ambar Bajpai, Anil G. Mathew, Payam Mehranpour, Wei Li, Andro G. Kacharava, Barry S. Fields, Harland Austin, A. Maziar Zafari. (2007) Circulating Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA and advanced coronary artery disease. International Journal of Cardiology 118:2, 215-219
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    M Mahmoudi, N Curzen, P J Gallagher. (2007) Atherogenesis: the role of inflammation and infection. Histopathology 50:5, 535-546
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Robyn Guymer, Luba Robman. (2007) Chlamydia pneumoniae and age-related macular degeneration: a role in pathogenesis or merely a chance association?. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 35:1, 89-93
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Luigi Giusto Spagnoli, Sabina Pucci, Elena Bonanno, Antonio Cassone, Fabiola Sesti, Alessandra Ciervo, Alessandro Mauriello. (2007) Persistent Chlamydia pneumoniae Infection of Cardiomyocytes Is Correlated with Fatal Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of Pathology 170:1, 33-42
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Philippe Giral, Jean-François Kahn, Jean-Michel André, Valérie Carreau, Caroline Dourmap, Eric Bruckert, M. John Chapman. (2007) Carotid atherosclerosis is not related to past tuberculosis in hypercholesterolemic patients. Atherosclerosis 190:1, 150-155
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Priscilla Y Hsue, Peter W Hunt, Elizabeth Sinclair, Barry Bredt, Arlana Franklin, Maudi Killian, Rebecca Hoh, Jeffrey N Martin, Joseph M McCune, David D Waters, Steven G Deeks. (2006) Increased carotid intima-media thickness in HIV patients is associated with increased cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell responses. AIDS 20:18, 2275-2283
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Robert N. Foley. (2006) Infections and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease 13:3, 205-208
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Sven Poppert, Katja Schlaupitz, Reinhard Marre, Rainer Voisard, Wolfgang Roessler, Dorothea Weckermann, Karl Weingärtner, Andreas Essig. (2006) Chlamydia pneumoniae in an ex vivo human artery culture model. Atherosclerosis 187:1, 50-56
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Firas F. Mussa, Hong Chai, Xinwen Wang, Qizhi Yao, Alan B. Lumsden, Changyi Chen. (2006) Chlamydia pneumoniae and vascular disease: An update. Journal of Vascular Surgery 43:6, 1301-1307
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    David M Rothstein, Christo Shalish, Christopher K Murphy, Andrew Sternlicht, Lee Ann Campbell. (2006) Development potential of rifalazil and other benzoxazinorifamycins. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 15:6, 603-623
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    E.A. Kaperonis, C.D. Liapis, J.D. Kakisis, D. Dimitroulis, V.G. Papavassiliou, D. Perrea, A.G. Kostakis. (2006) Inflammation and Chlamydia pneumoniae Infection Correlate with the Severity of Peripheral Arterial Disease. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 31:5, 509-515
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Alessandro Sionis. (2006) Estrategia de multidetección de Chlamydia pneumoniae en pacientes con enfermedad arterial periférica: el problema de evaluar la relación entre la infección y la enfermedad. Medicina Clínica 126:19, 740-741
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    C??cile Courivaud, Christophe Ferrand, Marina Deschamps, Pierre Tiberghien, Jean-Marc Chalopin, Anne Duperrier, Philippe Saas, Didier Ducloux. (2006) No Evidence of Association between NOD2/CARD15 Gene Polymorphism and Atherosclerotic Events after Renal Transplantation. Transplantation 81:8, 1212-1215
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    E.A. Kaperonis, C.D. Liapis, J.D. Kakisis, D. Dimitroulis, V.G. Papavassiliou. (2006) Inflammation and Atherosclerosis. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 31:4, 386-393
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Armin J. Grau, Lars Marquardt, Christoph Lichy. (2006) The effect of infections and vaccinations on stroke risk. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 6:2, 175-183
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    E Gurfinkel, V Lernoud. (2006) The role of infection and immunity in atherosclerosis. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 4:1, 131-137
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Alfredo Bardají, Joaquín Alonso, Xavier García-Moll, Héctor Bueno. (2006) Actualización en cardiopatía isquémica 2005. Revista Española de Cardiología 59, 3-19
    CrossRef

  58. 58

       . (2005) Antibiotica geen oplossing voor coronairlijden. Huisarts en Wetenschap 48:12, 101-101
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Jean A. Wiedeman, Ravi Kaul, Luke S. Heuer, Nao N. Thao, Kent E. Pinkerton, Wanda M. Wenman. (2005) Tobacco smoke induces a persistent, but recoverable state in Chlamydia pneumoniae infection of human endothelial cells. Microbial Pathogenesis 39:5-6, 197-204
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Thomas Dietrich, Raul I. Garcia. (2005) Associations Between Periodontal Disease and Systemic Disease: Evaluating the Strength of the Evidence. Journal of Periodontology 76:11-s, 2175-2184
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Laurence Senn, Margaret R Hammerschlag, Gilbert Greub. (2005) Therapeutic approaches to Chlamydia infections. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 6:13, 2281-2290
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Newton G. Osborne. (2005) Recurrent Acute Coronary Syndrome in Women: Is There a Future for Antibiotic Prophylaxis?. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery 21:3, 137-139
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Kazunori Shimada, Hiroyuki Daida, Wei Ma-Krupa, Jörg J Goronzy, Cornelia M Weyand. (2005) Lipopolysaccharide, CD14 and Toll-like receptors: an emerging link between innate immunity and atherosclerotic disease. Future Cardiology 1:5, 657-674
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    T. Vainas, F.R.M. Stassen, G.W.H. Schurink, J.H.M. Tordoir, R.J.Th.J. Welten, L.H.J.M. van den Akker, H.A.J.M. Kurvers, C.A. Bruggeman, P.J.E.H.M. Kitslaar. (2005) Reply to: Effect of Macrolides on Peripheral Arterial Disease Depends on Patient Selection and Adequate Treatment. P.A. Krayenbuehl, P. Wiesli, T. Meier, G. Schulthess. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 30:3, 337
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    (2005) Chlamydia pneumoniae and Acute Coronary Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 353:5, 525-528
    Full Text

  66. 66

    (2005) Antibiotic treatment and coronary heart disease. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine 2:6, 276-276
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Cannon, Christopher P., Braunwald, Eugene, McCabe, Carolyn H., Grayston, J. Thomas, Muhlestein, Brent, Giugliano, Robert P., Cairns, Richard, Skene, Allan M., . (2005) Antibiotic Treatment of Chlamydia pneumoniae after Acute Coronary Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 352:16, 1646-1654
    Full Text

  68. 68

    Anderson, Jeffrey L., . (2005) Infection, Antibiotics, and Atherothrombosis — End of the Road or New Beginnings?. New England Journal of Medicine 352:16, 1706-1709
    Full Text

  69. 69

    Hansson, Göran K., . (2005) Inflammation, Atherosclerosis, and Coronary Artery Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 352:16, 1685-1695
    Full Text

Letters