Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Brief Report

A WNT4 Mutation Associated with Müllerian-Duct Regression and Virilization in a 46,XX Woman

Anna Biason-Lauber, M.D., Daniel Konrad, M.D., Ph.D., Francesca Navratil, M.D., and Eugen J. Schoenle, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2004; 351:792-798August 19, 2004

Abstract

WNT4, a secreted protein that suppresses male sexual differentiation, is thought to repress the biosynthesis of gonadal androgen in female mammals. An 18-year-old woman presented with primary amenorrhea and an absence of müllerian-derived structures, unilateral renal agenesis, and clinical signs of androgen excess — a phenotype resembling the Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome and remarkably similar to that of female Wnt4-knockout mice. A genetic evaluation revealed a loss-of-function mutation in the WNT4 gene. WNT4 appears to be important in the development and maintenance of the female phenotype in women, by means of the regulation of müllerian-duct formation and control of ovarian steroidogenesis.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Chromatograms of the WNT4 DNA Sequence at Position 226 of Exon 5 in a Control Subject, the Patient, and the Patient's Mother and Sister (Panel A); Structure of the WNT4 Gene and Protein and Location of the E226G Mutation (Panel B); and Alignment of the Wild-Type E226G Sequence in Various Species.
Figure 2Dysregulation of the Signaling Pathway of the Mutant WNT4.
Article

The differentiation of a testis or an ovary from the bipotential gonad is a complex developmental process involving various genes and hormones.1 Additional elements of the reproductive tract develop from an indeterminate stage through the differentiation of wolffian ducts (male reproductive tract anlage) and müllerian ducts (female reproductive tract anlage). Although factors involved in male sexual differentiation have been well studied, the pathways that regulate female sexual differentiation remain incompletely defined. To date, no genes have been shown to play a role in ovarian development equivalent to that played by the SRY or SOX9 gene in testicular development. In mice, Wnt4, one of a few factors with a demonstrated function in the ovarian-determination pathway, has been found to be involved in sexual differentiation. WNT4, which suppresses male sexual differentiation,2-4 is a member of the WNT family of secreted molecules that function in a paracrine manner to effect a number of developmental changes. WNT proteins bind to members of the Frizzled family of cell-surface receptors and activate a cascade of intracellular signals leading to the transcriptional activation of target genes. Vainio et al.2 studied a mouse model in which Wnt4 is ablated5 and observed that, whereas both male and female Wnt4-knockout mice have similar defects in kidney development and adrenal function, gonadal development and steroidogenic function are affected exclusively in female Wnt4-knockout mice. Wnt4-knockout female mice are masculinized, as demonstrated by the absence of müllerian ducts and the presence of wolffian ducts, and express the steroidogenic enzymes 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and 17α-hydroxylase, which are required for the production of testosterone and are normally suppressed in the female ovary.2 Wnt4 up-regulates Dax1, a gene known to antagonize the nuclear-receptor steroid factor 1, and thereby inhibits steroidogenic enzymes.3 In XX gonads, WNT4 suppresses the migration of mesonephric endothelial and steroidogenic cells, preventing the formation of male-specific coelomic blood vessels and the production of steroids.4 Collectively, these data suggest that WNT4 normally functions to suppress the synthesis of gonadal androgen in females.

A previous search for clinically relevant WNT4 mutations in a large cohort of patients with abnormalities in sexual development was unsuccessful.6 We describe a woman without structures derived from müllerian ducts (uterine and fallopian tubes) who had unilateral renal agenesis and clinical signs of androgen excess. Her phenotype resembles that of patients with the Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome7,8 and is also strikingly similar to that of Wnt4-knockout female mice. This constellation of findings prompted us to search for mutations in the WNT4 gene in this patient.

Case Report

A woman who was 18 years 7 months old was referred for evaluation of primary amenorrhea. Thelarche and adrenarche had occurred at 12 years of age, and both breast and pubic-hair development had progressed normally. Physical examination revealed a normal weight (47 kg; standard-deviation score, –0.9 ), height (158 cm; standard-deviation score, –1.1), body-mass index ([the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters] 18.8; standard-deviation score, –0.6), and blood pressure (110/65 mm Hg); acne (requiring antiandrogen therapy); pubic hair of the adult-female type (Tanner stage 5); and mature female breasts (Tanner stage 5). The clitoral size was normal, but the vaginal introitus was small and short (0.5 cm). Laboratory examination revealed elevated levels of androstenedione (25.4 nmol per liter; normal range, 2.8 to 8.0) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (11.8 μmol per liter; normal range, 2.2 to 9.2). Total and free testosterone levels were repeatedly slightly elevated (e.g., 4.6 nmol per liter [normal range, 0.3 to 3.4] and 19.9 pmol per liter [normal range, 2.4 to 12.4], respectively), whereas levels of luteinizing hormone (10 IU per liter), follicle-stimulating hormone (6.4 IU per liter), 17-hydroxyprogesterone (5.4 nmol per liter), progesterone (16.2 nmol per liter), and estradiol (179 pmol per liter) were normal. Chromosomal analysis of 20 cells showed a normal female 46,XX karyotype. SRY was absent in lymphocytes. Pelvic and abdominal magnetic resonance imaging revealed that the vagina and uterus were absent, both ovaries were of normal size but ectopic (retroperitoneal, above the iliac crest), and the right kidney was aplastic, with compensatory hypertrophy of the left kidney.

Methods

The study conformed to the guidelines of the institutional review board, and all determinations were conducted as part of diagnostic procedures approved by the institutional review board. Oral informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Mutational Analysis of Genomic DNA

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral-blood leukocytes from the patient, her mother and sister, and 100 ethnically matched control subjects (200 alleles; 50 male and 50 female subjects), and all five exons of the WNT4 gene were amplified by means of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the use of a Qiagen DNA blood- and cell-culture kit. Sequences of the primers used to amplify the exons of WNT4 (GenBank accession number, NT_004610) and the gene for hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β (TCF2; GenBank accession numbers, U90279 and U90280-7) are available on request (Mycrosynth). SRY amplification was conducted as described previously.9 Direct cycle sequencing of the PCR products was performed with the use of the ABI Prism BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed with the use of the ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).

Expression Studies

To study the functional implications of the mutation we identified, we first performed reverse-transcriptase PCR on WNT4 messenger RNA (mRNA) ectopically expressed in peripheral-blood leukocytes from control subjects.10 Primer sequences and PCR-amplification conditions used for wild-type WNT4 complementary DNA (cDNA) are available on request. The wild-type cDNA was then subjected to PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis.11 The sequence was verified as described above. Confluent cultures of a human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line (OVCAR3, National Institutes of Health; American Type Culture Collection [ATCC], HTB-161), an adrenal adenocarcinoma cell line (H295R, National Cancer Institute; ATCC, CRL-2128), and renal 293T cells (ATCC, CRL-11268) were transfected with 10 μg of wild-type WNT4 DNA, 10 μg of mutant WNT4 DNA, or a combination of the two (molar ratio, 1:1) in 60-mm plates with the use of the TransFast transfection system reagent (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The ovarian adenocarcinoma cells, which express steroid receptors12 and steroidogenic enzymes,13 provide an in vitro model for evaluating the functional effects of WNT4. The influence of wild-type and mutant WNT4 on the expression of the steroidogenic enzymes 17α-hydroxylase (GenBank accession number, NM_000102) and 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (GenBank accession number, 000198) and of the transcription factor hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β (GenBank accession numbers, U90279 and U90280-7) was studied by means of quantitative real-time PCR, performed with the use of an ABI 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applera Europe), and PCR products were quantified fluorometrically with the use of the SYBR Green Core Reagent kit. The reference mRNA cyclophilin was used to normalize the data. Western blot analysis was performed with the use of anti-Xpress (Invitrogen), an antibody that recognizes the epitope of the N-terminal Xpress peptide, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The activity of the steroidogenic enzymes was assessed by radioimmunoassays of progesterone (DPC Biermann) and 17-hydroxyprogesterone, androstenedione, and testosterone (CisBio International) in cell-culture medium after the addition of pregnenolone (100 ng per milliliter) as a precursor. Total protein content was assayed (BioRad protein assay).

In vivo labeling of WNT4 with tritiated palmitate was performed as described previously,14 except that the assay was performed in cell extracts rather than in medium after immunoprecipitation of the protein13 with the use of anti-Xpress antibody. Western blotting was performed to determine the degree of β-catenin stabilization with the use of a commercially available antibody against β-catenin (U.S. Biological). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Results

Direct sequencing of PCR-amplified exonic fragments revealed a heterozygous substitution of guanine for adenine in exon 5 of the WNT4 gene, leading to the Glu226Gly (E226G) missense mutation of the WNT4 protein (Figure 1AFigure 1Chromatograms of the WNT4 DNA Sequence at Position 226 of Exon 5 in a Control Subject, the Patient, and the Patient's Mother and Sister (Panel A); Structure of the WNT4 Gene and Protein and Location of the E226G Mutation (Panel B); and Alignment of the Wild-Type E226G Sequence in Various Species. and Figure 1B). Glutamate 226 is a WNT4 residue conserved among human, mouse, rat, chicken, zebra fish, and lancelet species (Figure 1C). The absence of the mutation in the DNA of the patient's mother and sister and 100 control subjects (200 alleles, data not shown) indicates that this substitution was either inherited from her father (whose DNA was not available for analysis) or a spontaneous event, and that it is not a common polymorphism. No mutation was found in the TCF2 gene, which encodes the transcription factor hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β that is crucial for the development of the kidneys and pancreas15 (data not shown). To determine the functional consequences of the rearrangement, we studied the expression of the steroidogenic enzymes 17α-hydroxylase and 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1β. The mutant WNT4 was unable to suppress the expression of the steroidogenic enzymes in ovarian adenocarcinoma cells (Figure 2AFigure 2Dysregulation of the Signaling Pathway of the Mutant WNT4.) and adrenal adenocarcinoma cells (data not shown). In renal cells, the mutant WNT4 appeared to favor the expression of the short form of TCF2, which is devoid of the transactivation domain (data not shown). The effects were not due to differences in the expression of WNT4 (Figure 2B). The lack of inhibition of the expression of steroidogenic enzymes resulted in increased steroid production in ovarian adenocarcinoma cells transfected with the mutant WNT4 (Figure 3Figure 3Inefficient Palmitoylation Underlying Impaired Secretion of the Mutant WNT4.), as also appeared to be the case in the ovaries of our patient. The absence of the mutant WNT4 in the medium of cultured ovarian cells (Figure 3A) suggests that the mutant WNT4 remains trapped within the cells.

Since proper processing of WNT proteins requires lipid-mediated modification,16 we evaluated the extent of the attachment of radiolabeled palmitate to wild-type and mutant WNT4 in ovarian adenocarcinoma cells. The E226G mutant was inefficiently palmitoylated and, when transfected together with the wild type, partially prevented the palmitoylation of the transfected wild-type WNT4 (Figure 3B). The differences in lipid modification are not due to differences in the amount or stability of the protein (Figure 3C). Evidence that the mutation did cause a defect in the WNT4 signal-transduction pathway was provided by the failure to detect β-catenin (stabilized by the activation of the WNT signaling pathway) in ovarian adenocarcinoma cells transfected with the mutant WNT4 (Figure 3D).

Discussion

The genetic factors controlling development in female mammals remain mysterious. With the exception of translocations in SRY and mutations in steroidogenic enzymes, the genetic mechanisms that cause a phenotypic XX male or XX virilization are poorly understood. We determined the biologic consequences of a mutation in WNT4 and found that this gene appears to play a key role in human sexual differentiation.

The regression of the müllerian ducts in our patient suggests the occurrence in utero of ectopic ovarian expression of antimüllerian hormone, which is normally produced solely by testicular Sertoli cells at this stage of development. Furthermore, similar to Wnt4-knockout female mice, our patient had clinical and biochemical signs of ectopic activation of androgenesis. The androgen excess appears mild, since her external genitalia were not virilized, a feature that again resembles the phenotype of Wnt4-knockout female mice. We do not have direct proof that the mutation in WNT4 led to morphologic masculinization of the ovaries or loss of oocytes in our patient, since we did not analyze ovarian tissue. Nevertheless, the inability of the mutant WNT4 to inhibit the expression and activity of the steroidogenic enzymes in ovarian and adrenal cell lines provides good indirect evidence that the impairment of WNT4 signaling may have caused the androgen excess. Unlike the female Wnt4-knockout mice,17 our patient did not have any defects in breast development, suggesting that this particular WNT4 mutation does not affect mammary-gland growth in women.

The mutant Glu226 residue in WNT4 in our patient (E226G) is conserved among species. However, other WNT proteins have different residues at that position, although never a glycine.

In searching for causes of the defective signaling, we found that the E226G mutant protein appears to be trapped inside the cell. The normal processing of WNT proteins is directly dependent on lipid modification. This apparently paradoxical phenomenon (cells have trouble releasing a molecule that is less hydrophobic than usual) is a very well known characteristic of WNT proteins and is probably due to misfolding of the protein during the formation of disulfide bonds between free cysteines.16 The E226G mutation prevents lipid modification and therefore represents a mechanism underlying the transduction defect. The mutated glutamate is not located in a consensus palmitoylation site (residues 77 through 90), and it is thus more likely that the mutation leads to misfolding, retention of the protein in the endoplasmic reticulum, and a subsequent lack of palmitoylation. The reasons for the surprisingly efficient secretion of wild-type WNT4 are unclear, although we cannot exclude the possible involvement of the Xpress epitope. We obtained similar results in all functional assays when we evaluated the mutant and the wild-type WNT4 together. This finding suggests that the mutant WNT4 has dominant negative properties and provides a clear correlation between the genotype and the phenotype. However, the mechanism underlying such events remains unexplained, since WNT proteins do not seem to dimerize.14

The loss-of-function mutation we identified in the WNT4 gene appears to cause developmental abnormalities in humans and indicates that WNT4 is a major player in the development and maintenance of the female phenotype in women, by virtue of its ability to regulate the formation of müllerian ducts and control steroidogenesis in the ovary. Any generalizations regarding its role, however, must await the description and characterization of mutations in additional patients.

Supported by a grant (32-063629.00) from the Swiss National Science Foundation.

We are indebted to Dr. E. Liechti-Keusch for admitting the patient and for her collaboration.

Source Information

From the Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Biason-Lauber at University Children's Hospital, Steinwiesstr. 75, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    MacLaughlin DT, Donahoe PK. Sex determination and differentiation. N Engl J Med 2004;350:367-378
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Vainio S, Heikkila M, Kispert A, Chin N, McMahon AP. Female development in mammals is regulated by Wnt4 signalling. Nature 1999;397:405-409
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Jordan BK, Mohammed M, Ching ST, et al. Up-regulation of WNT-4 signaling and dosage-sensitive sex reversal in humans. Am J Hum Genet 2001;68:1102-1109
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Jeays-Ward K, Hoyle C, Brennan J, et al Endothelial and steroidogenic cell migration are regulated by WNT4 in the developing mammalian gonad. Development 2003;130:3663-3670
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Stark K, Vainio S, Vassileva G, McMahon AP. Epithelial transformation of metanephric mesenchyme in the developing kidney regulated by Wnt-4. Nature 1994;372:679-683
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Domenice S, Correa RV, Costa EMF, et al. Mutations in the SRY, DAX1, SF1 and WNT4 genes in Brazilian sex-reversed patients. Braz J Med Biol Res 2004;37:145-150
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Bryan AL, Nigro JA, Counseller VS. One-hundred cases of congenital absence of the vagina. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1949;88:79-86
    Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Opitz JM. Vaginal atresia (von Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster or MRK anomaly) in hereditary renal adysplasia (HRA). Am J Med Genet 1987;26:873-876
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Cui K, Warnes GM, Jeffrey R, Matthews CD. Sex determination of preimplantation embryos by human testis-determining-gene amplification. Lancet 1994;343:79-82
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Biason-Lauber A, Lang-Muritano M, Vaccaro T, Schoenle EJ. Loss of kinase activity in a patient with Wolcott-Rallison syndrome caused by a novel mutation in the EIF2AK3 gene. Diabetes 2002;51:2301-2305
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Rosa S, Biason-Lauber A, Mongan NP, Navratil F, Schoenle EJ. Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome caused by a novel mutation in the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor: functional characterization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:4378-4382
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Hamilton TC, Young RC, McKoy WM, et al. Characterization of a human ovarian carcinoma cell line (NIH:OVCAR3) with androgen and estrogen receptors. Cancer Res 1983;43:5379-5389
    Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Biason-Lauber A, Zachmann M, Schonle EJ. Effect of leptin on CYP17 enzymatic activities in human adrenal cells: new insight in the onset of adrenarche. Endocrinology 2000;141:1446-1454
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Willert K, Brown JD, Danenberg E, et al. Wnt proteins are lipid-modified and can act as stem cell growth factors. Nature 2003;423:448-452
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Lindner TH, Njolstad PR, Horikawa Y, Bostad L, Bell GI, Sovik O. A novel syndrome of diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction and genital malformation associated with a partial deletion of the pseudo-POU domain of hepatocyte nuclear factor-1β. Hum Mol Genet 1999;8:2001-2008
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Nusse R. Wnts and Hedgehogs: lipid-modified proteins and similarities in signaling mechanisms at the cell surface. Development 2003;130:5297-5305
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Brisken C, Heineman A, Chavarria T, et al. Essential function of Wnt-4 in mammary gland development downstream of progesterone signaling. Genes Dev 2000;14:650-654
    Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (56)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Katie Whaley, Jordan Winter, Kathleen M. Eyster, Keith A. Hansen. (2012) Müllerian agenesis with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia syndrome. Fertility and Sterility
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Stefanie Eggers, Andrew Sinclair. (2012) Mammalian sex determination—insights from humans and mice. Chromosome Research
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Kathryn McClelland, Josephine Bowles, Peter Koopman. (2012) Male sex determination: insights into molecular mechanisms. Asian Journal of Andrology 14:1, 164-171
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Lawrence C. Layman. 2012. Disorders of the Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Gonadal Axis. , 659-683.
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Thomas E. Spencer, Kathrin A. Dunlap, Justyna Filant. (2011) Comparative developmental biology of the uterus: Insights into mechanisms and developmental disruption. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    P. Wieacker, S. Ledig, N. Bogdanova. (2011) Genetisch bedingte Entwicklungsstörungen der Genitalwege. medizinische genetik 23:2, 267-270
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Pascal Philibert, Anna Biason-Lauber, Iva Gueorguieva, Chantal Stuckens, Catherine Pienkowski, Béatrice Lebon-Labich, Françoise Paris, Charles Sultan. (2011) Molecular analysis of WNT4 gene in four adolescent girls with mullerian duct abnormality and hyperandrogenism (atypical Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome). Fertility and Sterility 95:8, 2683-2686
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Maria Sandbacka, Sara Bruce, Mervi Halttunen, Minna Puhakka, Päivi Lahermo, Katariina Hannula-Jouppi, Marita Lipsanen-Nyman, Juha Kere, Kristiina Aittomäki, Hannele Laivuori. (2011) Methylation of H19 and its imprinted control region (H19 ICR1) in Müllerian aplasia. Fertility and Sterility 95:8, 2703-2706
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Susanne Ledig, Cordula Schippert, Reiner Strick, Matthias W. Beckmann, Patricia G. Oppelt, Peter Wieacker. (2011) Recurrent aberrations identified by array-CGH in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Fertility and Sterility 95:5, 1589-1594
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    M. Cools, K.P. Wolffenbuttel, S.L.S. Drop, J.W. Oosterhuis, L.H.J. Looijenga. (2011) Gonadal Development and Tumor Formation at the Crossroads of Male and Female Sex Determination. Sexual Development 5:4, 167-180
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Maria Sandbacka, Mervi Halttunen, Varpu Jokimaa, Kristiina Aittomäki, Hannele Laivuori. (2011) Evaluation of SHOX copy number variations in patients with Müllerian aplasia. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 6:1, 53
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Tamara Zaytouni, Evgeni E. Efimenko, Sergei G. Tevosian. 2011. GATA Transcription Factors in the Developing Reproductive System. , 93-134.
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Enzo Lalli. (2010) Adrenal cortex ontogenesis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 24:6, 853-864
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Juan Carlos Jorge. (2010) The Embryology of Gender. Journal of LGBT Youth 7:4, 310-319
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Cristina Gervasini, Francesca Romana Grati, Faustina Lalatta, Silvia Tabano, Barbara Gentilin, Patrizia Colapietro, Simona De Toffol, Giada Frontino, Francesca Motta, Silvia Maitz, Laura Bernardini, Bruno Dallapiccola, Luigi Fedele, Lidia Larizza, Monica Miozzo. (2010) SHOX duplications found in some cases with type I Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Genetics in Medicine 12:10, 634-640
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Hong-Fei Li, Xiao-Bo Wang, Ya-Ping Jin, Yan-Xun Xia, Xin-Gang Feng, Jian-Mei Yang, Xin-Yong Qi, Chun-Xiu Yuan, Jiao-Jiao Lin. (2010) Wnt4, the first member of the Wnt family identified in Schistosoma japonicum, regulates worm development by the canonical pathway. Parasitology Research 107:4, 795-805
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Q. Cheng, K. T. Ng, S. T. Fan, Z. X. Lim, D. Y. Guo, X. B. Liu, Y. Liu, R. T. P. Poon, C. M. Lo, K. Man. (2010) Distinct Mechanism of Small-for-Size Fatty Liver Graft Injury-Wnt4 Signaling Activates Hepatic Stellate Cells. American Journal of Transplantation 10:5, 1178-1188
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Anna Biason-Lauber. (2010) Control of sex development. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 24:2, 163-186
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Panagiotis Christopoulos, Maria Gazouli, Georgia Fotopoulou, George Creatsas. (2009) The Role of Genes in the Development of Mullerian Anomalies. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 64:11, 760-768
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Saila Lappalainen, Raimo Voutilainen, Pauliina Utriainen, Markku Laakso, Jarmo Jääskeläinen. (2009) Genetic variation of FTO and TCF7L2 in premature adrenarche. Metabolism 58:9, 1263-1269
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Bryan T. MacDonald, Keiko Tamai, Xi He. (2009) Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling: Components, Mechanisms, and Diseases. Developmental Cell 17:1, 9-26
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Martine Cools, Leendert H. J. Looijenga, Katja P. Wolffenbuttel, Sten L. S. Drop. (2009) Disorders of sex development: update on the genetic background, terminology and risk for the development of germ cell tumors. World Journal of Pediatrics 5:2, 93-102
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Anna Biason-Lauber, Daniel Konrad, Monika Meyer, Carine deBeaufort, Eugen J. Schoenle. (2009) Ovaries and Female Phenotype in a Girl with 46,XY Karyotype and Mutations in the CBX2 Gene. The American Journal of Human Genetics 84:5, 658-663
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Celia Ravel, Diana Lorenço, Lionel Dessolle, Jacqueline Mandelbaum, Ken McElreavey, Emile Darai, Jean Pierre Siffroi. (2009) Mutational analysis of the WNT gene family in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertility and Sterility 91:4, 1604-1607
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Jean-Philippe Rey, Debra L. Ellies. (2009) Wnt modulators in the biotech pipeline. Developmental Dynamicsn/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Cristina Has, Ivelina Yordanova, Maria Balabanova, Jana Kazandjieva, Corinna Herz, Jürgen Kohlhase, Leena Bruckner-Tuderman. (2008) A novel large FERMT1 (KIND1) gene deletion in Kindler syndrome. Journal of Dermatological Science 52:3, 209-212
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    C.-F. Liu, N. Bingham, K. Parker, H. H.-C. Yao. (2008) Sex-specific roles of  -catenin in mouse gonadal development. Human Molecular Genetics 18:3, 405-417
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Juliana B. Drummond, Camila F. Rezende, Fabio C. Peixoto, Joana S. Carvalho, Fernando M. Reis, Luiz Marco. (2008) Molecular analysis of the β-catenin gene in patients with the Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 25:11-12, 511-514
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Yi Cai. (2008) Participation of Caudal Müllerian Mesenchyma in Prostate Development. The Journal of Urology 180:5, 1898-1903
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    K. Morcel, D. Guerrier, T. Watrin, I. Pellerin, J. Levêque. (2008) Le syndrome de Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) : clinique et génétique. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 37:6, 539-546
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Larissa Kerecuk, Michiel F Schreuder, Adrian S Woolf. (2008) Renal tract malformations: perspectives for nephrologists. Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology 4:6, 312-325
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    M Barbaro, A Cicognani, A Balsamo, Å Löfgren, L Baldazzi, A Wedell, M Oscarson. (2008) Gene dosage imbalances in patients with 46,XY gonadal DSD detected by an in-house-designed synthetic probe set for multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis. Clinical Genetics 73:5, 453-464
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Petra Kempná, Christa E. Flück. (2008) Adrenal gland development and defects. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 22:1, 77-93
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Ieuan A. Hughes. (2008) Disorders of sex development: a new definition and classification. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 22:1, 119-134
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Sasmira Lalwani, Hsin-hung Wu, Richard H. Reindollar, Mark R. Gray. (2008) HOXA10 mutations in congenital absence of uterus and vagina. Fertility and Sterility 89:2, 325-330
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Hannah Mandel, Revital Shemer, Zvi U. Borochowitz, Marina Okopnik, Carlos Knopf, Margarita Indelman, Arie Drugan, Dov Tiosano, Ruth Gershoni-Baruch, Mordechai Choder, Eli Sprecher. (2008) SERKAL Syndrome: An Autosomal-Recessive Disorder Caused by a Loss-of-Function Mutation in WNT4. The American Journal of Human Genetics 82:1, 39-47
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    SELMA FELDMAN WITCHEL, PETER A. LEE. 2008. Ambiguous Genitalia. , 127-164.
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Lynn Adaimy, Eliane Chouery, Hala Mégarbané, Salman Mroueh, Valérie Delague, Elsa Nicolas, Hanen Belguith, Philippe de Mazancourt, André Mégarbané. (2007) Mutation in WNT10A Is Associated with an Autosomal Recessive Ectodermal Dysplasia: The Odonto-onycho-dermal Dysplasia. The American Journal of Human Genetics 81:4, 821-828
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Makoto Komura, Yutaka Kanamori, Masahiko Sugiyama, Tetsuya Tomonaga, Kan Suzuki, Kouhei Hashizume, Keigo Goishi. (2007) A Female Infant Who Had both Complete VACTERL Association and MURCS Association: Report of a Case. Surgery Today 37:10, 878-880
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Dagmar Wilhelm. (2007) R-spondin1—discovery of the long-missing, mammalian female-determining gene?. BioEssays 29:4, 314-318
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Dagan Jenkins, Maria Bitner-Glindzicz, Louise Thomasson, Sue Malcolm, Stephanie A. Warne, Sally A. Feather, Sarah E. Flanagan, Sian Ellard, Coralie Bingham, Lane Santos, Mark Henkemeyer, Andrew Zinn, Linda A. Baker, Duncan T. Wilcox, Adrian S. Woolf. (2007) Mutational analyses of UPIIIA, SHH, EFNB2, and HNF1β in persistent cloaca and associated kidney malformations. Journal of Pediatric Urology 3:1, 2-9
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Peter Oppelt, Meike von Have, Mareike Paulsen, Pamela L. Strissel, Reiner Strick, Sara Brucker, Diethelm Wallwiener, Matthias W. Beckmann. (2007) Female genital malformations and their associated abnormalities. Fertility and Sterility 87:2, 335-342
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Pascal Bernard, Vincent R. Harley. (2007) Wnt4 action in gonadal development and sex determination. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 39:1, 31-43
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    ADRIAN S. WOOLF, KATHERINE A. HILLMAN. (2007) Unilateral renal agenesis and the congenital solitary functioning kidney: developmental, genetic and clinical perspectives. BJU International 99:1, 17-21
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Nico Janssens, Michel Janicot, Tim Perera. (2006) The Wnt-dependent signaling pathways as target in oncology drug discovery. Investigational New Drugs 24:4, 263-280
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Carola Cheroki, Ana Cristina Krepischi-Santos, Carla Rosenberg, Fernanda Sarquis Jehee, Regina Célia Mingroni-Netto, Ivo Pavanello Filho, Sebastião Zanforlin Filho, Chong Ae Kim, Vicente R. Bagnoli, Berenice B. Mendonça, Karoly Szuhai, Paulo A. Otto. (2006) Report of a del22q11 in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) anomaly and exclusion ofWNT-4,RAR-gamma, andRXR-alpha as major genes determining MRKH anomaly in a study of 25 affected women. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 140A:12, 1339-1342
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Ping Zheng, Rita Vassena, Keith Latham. (2006) Expression and downregulation of WNT signaling pathway genes in rhesus monkey oocytes and embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development 73:6, 667-677
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Sari M. Anders, Neil V. Watson. (2006) Social neuroendocrinology. Human Nature 17:2, 212-237
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Giovanna Camerino, Pietro Parma, Orietta Radi, Stella Valentini. (2006) Sex determination and sex reversal. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 16:3, 289-292
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    J.A. Stockman. (2006) A WNT4 Mutation Associated With Müllerian-Duct Regression and Virilization in a 46, XX Woman. Yearbook of Pediatrics 2006, 134-135
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Pierre Val, Amanda Swain. (2005) Mechanisms of Disease: normal and abnormal gonadal development and sex determination in mammals. Nature Clinical Practice Urology 2:12, 616-627
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Mathieu Clément-Ziza, Naziha Khen, Jacques Gonzales, Célia Crétolle-Vastel, Jean-Yves Picard, Anna Tullio-Pelet, Claude Besmond, Arnold Munnich, Stanislas Lyonnet, Claire Nihoul-Fékété. (2005) Exclusion ofWNT4 as a major gene in Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser anomaly. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 137A:1, 98-99
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Paul G. McDonough. (2005) Hot clues to the etiology of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome?. Fertility and Sterility 84:2, 545
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Millie Behera, Grace Couchman, David Walmer, Thomas M. Price. (2005) Mullerian Agenesis and Thrombocytopenia Absent Radius Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of Syndromes Associated With Mullerian Agenesis. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 60:7, 453-461
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    A Fleming, E Vilain. (2005) The endless quest for sex determination genes. Clinical Genetics 67:1, 15-25
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Hughes, Ieuan A., . (2004) Female Development — All by Default?. New England Journal of Medicine 351:8, 748-750
    Full Text