Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Community-Based Therapy for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Lima, Peru

Carole Mitnick, Sc.D., Jaime Bayona, M.D., M.P.H., Eda Palacios, R.N., Sonya Shin, M.D., Jennifer Furin, M.D., Ph.D., Felix Alcántara, M.D., Epifanio Sánchez, M.D., Madeleny Sarria, R.N., Mercedes Becerra, Sc.D., Mary C. Smith Fawzi, Sc.D., Saidi Kapiga, M.D., Sc.D., Donna Neuberg, Sc.D., James H. Maguire, M.D., Jim Yong Kim, M.D., Ph.D., and Paul Farmer, M.D., Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 2003; 348:119-128January 9, 2003

Abstract

Background

Despite the prevalence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in nearly all low-income countries surveyed, effective therapy has been deemed too expensive and considered not to be feasible outside referral centers. We evaluated the results of community-based therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a poor section of Lima, Peru.

Methods

We describe the first 75 patients to receive ambulatory treatment with individualized regimens for chronic multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in northern Lima. We conducted a retrospective review of the charts of all patients enrolled in the program between August 1, 1996, and February 1, 1999, and identified predictors of poor outcomes.

Results

The infecting strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were resistant to a median of six drugs. Among the 66 patients who completed four or more months of therapy, 83 percent (55) were probably cured at the completion of treatment. Five of these 66 patients (8 percent) died while receiving therapy. Only one patient continued to have positive cultures after six months of treatment. All patients in whom treatment failed or who died had extensive bilateral pulmonary disease. In a multiple Cox proportional-hazards regression model, the predictors of the time to treatment failure or death were a low hematocrit (hazard ratio, 4.09; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.35 to 12.36) and a low body-mass index (hazard ratio, 3.23; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 11.53). Inclusion of pyrazinamide and ethambutol in the regimen (when susceptibility was confirmed) was associated with a favorable outcome (hazard ratio for treatment failure or death, 0.30; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.83).

Conclusions

Community-based outpatient treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis can yield high cure rates even in resource-poor settings. Early initiation of appropriate therapy can preserve susceptibility to first-line drugs and improve treatment outcomes.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Frequency Distribution of Antituberculosis Agents Received by the 75 Patients as Part of Individualized Treatment Regimens.
Table 1Characteristics of the 75 Patients at the Initiation of Individualized Treatment Regimens.
Article

In Peru, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, defined as disease caused by strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that are resistant to at least isoniazid and rifampin, is responsible for about 3 percent1,2 of cases among patients not previously treated for tuberculosis and about 15 percent of cases among those previously treated. It has frequently been suggested that the comprehensive “DOTS” strategy — which involves giving a short course of directly observed multidrug treatment, as well as requiring government commitment, case detection by smear microscopy, a regular supply of antituberculosis drugs, and standardized recording and reporting — can eliminate multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.3-5 However, the short-course chemotherapy on which DOTS is based usually fails to cure multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.6-8 Rates of cure of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with standardized short-course chemotherapy range from 5 percent9 to 60 percent.10

Therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis has been virtually nonexistent in poor countries. It has been argued that drug-susceptibility testing and second-line drugs are not cost effective in these countries because of limited resources and that intensive clinical management is impossible because of lack of infrastructure.3,11,12 There are few treatment models, and the reported rates of success of treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in middle-income countries and regions ranged in recent reports from less than 60 percent in Indonesia and Taiwan13,14 to just over 80 percent in Hong Kong, Korea, and Turkey.15-17 In these studies, treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis was costly and was provided in referral hospitals. The few studies of the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in outpatients all found successful outcomes in less than half of cases.18-20

Without treatment, multidrug-resistant strains can spread rapidly within vulnerable populations.21-23 Because standardized short-course chemotherapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis has been associated with unacceptably high rates of failure and relapse,6,10,24 new approaches to treatment in poor countries are needed.25-27 We conducted a community-based project for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a resource-poor setting. This DOTS-Plus project — which entailed the addition of second-line drugs, monitoring by sputum culture, drug-susceptibility testing, and directly observed individualized therapy28 to the well-established Peruvian DOTS program — treated a cohort of patients with long-standing disease due to highly resistant strains of M. tuberculosis.29,30 We identified risk factors associated with poor outcomes and predictors of the time to death.

Methods

Study Patients

Between August 1, 1996, and November 30, 1998, 731 patients were referred for evaluation for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis by Socios En Salud, a nongovernmental organization working in northern Lima, Peru, in collaboration with the Peruvian Ministry of Health and academic and nongovernmental organizations based in the United States. Seventy-five (10 percent) met the following criteria for inclusion in the study: beginning of supervised, individualized treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis before February 1, 1999; residence in the government-approved catchment area in northern Lima (Carabayllo, Comas, and Independencia districts); referral by a collaborating health center after the failure of at least one course of directly observed, standardized short-course chemotherapy; laboratory-documented multidrug-resistant tuberculosis; survival until the results of drug-susceptibility testing became available; and provision of written informed consent. All 75 patients who began therapy during this period are included in this report; high-grade drug resistance, gravity of disease, and the presence of coexisting conditions were not indications for exclusion. Most patients referred did not live in the catchment area.

Bacteriologic Studies and Drug-Susceptibility Testing

Sputum samples were collected for smear microscopy and culture at base line and monthly thereafter. The samples were processed and read according to international standards31 at Sergio E. Bernales Hospital in Lima. At base line, isolates of M. tuberculosis were tested for susceptibility to the following drugs: isoniazid (concentrations, 0.2, 1, and 5 μg per milliliter), rifampin (1 μg per milliliter), ethambutol (5 μg per milliliter), pyrazinamide (100 μg per milliliter), streptomycin (2 and 10 μg per milliliter), kanamycin (5 μg per milliliter), capreomycin (10 μg per milliliter), ethionamide (5 μg per milliliter), cycloserine (30 μg per milliliter), and ciprofloxacin (2 μg per milliliter). Testing was performed by staff members of the Massachusetts State Laboratory Institute, using the proportion method32 on 7H10 agar plates and, for pyrazinamide, the BACTEC33 method. Highly resistant isolates were tested on 7H9 agar plates for susceptibility to amikacin (2, 4, and 8 μg per milliliter), rifabutin (0.12, 0.5, and 2 μg per milliliter), and clarithromycin (2, 8, and 32 μg per milliliter) at the National Jewish Medical and Research Center in Denver.

Treatment and Monitoring of Adverse Events

While the results of susceptibility testing were pending, most patients were treated empirically under direct observation with regimens containing at least five drugs to which their strains were deemed likely to be sensitive on the basis of previous regimens used. The definitive regimens, containing a minimum of five drugs and lasting at least 18 months, were determined on the basis of the results of drug-susceptibility tests, which were available a mean (±SD) of 62.6±32.9 days after sputum collection. First-line drugs were used preferentially even in cases in which repeated test results were inconsistent, provided that susceptibility had been documented at least once. A parenteral agent was administered for at least six months after culture conversion.34 Treatment was terminated after 12 or more consecutive negative cultures had been recorded. Sputum samples continued to be collected and cultured at least annually after the completion of treatment. Patients received limited nutritional, financial, and social support through Socios En Salud.35

Treatment was given on an outpatient basis. Treatment and surveillance for adverse events were managed by a team of specially trained community health workers, nurses, and physicians under the auspices of Socios En Salud.29,30 Each patient underwent complete clinical — including neurologic, psychiatric, and audiometric — evaluations before enrollment. Base-line laboratory analyses included a complete blood count, measurement of blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine, tests of hepatic function (measurement of serum aminotransferases, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and a Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test at base line. Monitoring of renal and hepatic function was performed regularly during therapy; other laboratory tests were performed as indicated, on the basis of symptoms.

Definitions of Outcome

Probable cure was defined by at least 12 months of consecutive negative cultures during therapy; a single intervening positive culture with fewer than 10 colonies was allowed. Treatment failure was defined by the presence of a positive culture after six months of treatment. Withdrawal from therapy was defined by one or more months of missed therapy during the first year, and two or more months missed during the second year. Death was defined as death from any cause during therapy or follow-up. Relapse was defined by two or more positive cultures after the completion of treatment among patients whose treatment outcome was probable cure.

Collection of Data

Patients' characteristics and risk factors at base line (drawn from clinical records with the use of a structured instrument) included the following: extent of pulmonary parenchymal damage; number of previous treatments; low body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters), defined as less than 18.5 for women and less than 20 for men36; anemia, defined as a hematocrit of less than 30 percent in women or less than 36 percent in men37; the number of antituberculosis agents to which the infecting strain was resistant; the number of drugs in the regimen; age; sex; household size; history of homelessness, substance abuse, or institutionalization; medical history and coexisting conditions; respiratory difficulty, observed as tachypnea at rest (more than 26 breaths per minute),38 dyspnea at rest or on exertion, or use of accessory muscles; and the time elapsed since the first diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed to determine the associations between risk factors and a poor outcome (treatment failure or death) during therapy and the follow-up period, through August 31, 2002.

Clinically relevant risk factors were analyzed with the use of Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards models to generate estimates of the associations with the time to death or treatment failure. Confounding by demographic characteristics, previous treatment history, and resistance to first-line drugs was assessed by multiple Cox proportional-hazards models. Plots of the natural logarithm of the negative of the natural logarithm of the survival curves for all levels of primary predictors were consistent with the assumption of proportionality.39 Data on patients who withdrew from therapy were censored at the time of withdrawal, since their risk of a poor clinical outcome could no longer be assessed.40

Data were entered into Access97 (Microsoft). Data were missing for some patients for some risk factors; missing values for body-mass index and hematocrit were imputed as the sex-specific medians. SAS software (version 8.1) was used for all analyses. All reported P values are two-sided.

Results

Base-Line Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

The patients were young, and most were single (Table 1Table 1Characteristics of the 75 Patients at the Initiation of Individualized Treatment Regimens.), with nearly equal numbers of men and women. The household size was generally large, and often two or more patients came from a single household. More than half the patients had prior or current medical illness; four had concurrent extrapulmonary tuberculosis. One of 65 patients tested had HIV infection. A low hematocrit was recorded in 12 patients (18 percent). Nearly half the patients had an elevated resting respiratory rate, a low body-mass index, or both. Bilateral cavitary parenchymal disease was evident in 47 base-line chest radiographs (63 percent). The patients had received treatment with a median of 3 prior antituberculosis regimens (range, 0 to 8) during the nearly four years between the diagnosis of tuberculosis and the initiation of the individualized regimens described here. The patients had been previously exposed to a median of 7 antituberculosis drugs (range, 0 to 10) for at least one month each. The infecting strains of M. tuberculosis were resistant to a median of 6 drugs (range, 2 to 12).

Outcomes

The 75 patients received treatment with 58 different regimens (Figure 1Figure 1Frequency Distribution of Antituberculosis Agents Received by the 75 Patients as Part of Individualized Treatment Regimens.), containing a median of six drugs (range, five to nine) (Table 2Table 2Characteristics of Treatment Regimens.) and lasting a median of 23 months (range, 0.4 to 35.9). The records of 60 patients were reviewed systematically for adverse events; 44 patients (73 percent) had such events, and all events were managed without physician-directed discontinuation of therapy.41

Sixty-six patients completed four or more months of therapy; conversion was evident in smears and cultures in a median of just over one month. Of these 66 patients, 55 (83 percent) had probable cures at the completion of therapy, 5 patients (8 percent) withdrew from therapy, therapy failed in 1 patient, and 5 patients (8 percent) died while receiving therapy, after having completed more than four months of therapy.

Patients were followed for a median of 40 months (range, 7 to 66) after therapy. During therapy and follow-up, 18 poor clinical outcomes occurred: 17 deaths and 1 failure of therapy. Autopsies were not performed; the causes of death, as suggested by the clinical history, are shown in Table 3Table 3Suspected Causes of Death among Patients Who Died during or after Individualized Treatment..

Predictors of a Poor Clinical Outcome

In univariate analyses, a low hematocrit was found to predict a poor outcome throughout therapy and follow-up: after four months of therapy, only four patients with a normal base-line hematocrit value (6 percent) had died, whereas five patients with a low hematocrit (42 percent) had died (P<0.001 by the generalized Wilcoxon test). Low base-line body-mass index was also predictive of earlier death: at four months, only one patient with normal base-line body-mass index (2 percent) and eight patients with low body-mass index (25 percent) had died (P<0.001 by the generalized Wilcoxon test).

In the final multiple Cox proportional-hazards regression model, a low hematocrit (P=0.01 by the Wald χ2 test) and resistance to pyrazinamide or ethambutol (P=0.02 by the Wald χ2 test) were significantly associated with the time to a poor outcome (Table 4Table 4Risk Factors Associated with the Time to a Poor Outcome during Therapy.). Although low body-mass index was of borderline statistical significance in this model (P=0.07 by the Wald χ2 test), it confounded the effect of a low hematocrit, lowering the effect estimate by more than 30 percent. After adjustment for low body-mass index and low hematocrit, nulliparous women were at greater risk for a shorter time to a poor outcome than other women (P=0.01 by the Wald χ2 test).

Discussion

Large-scale, standardized surveys have revealed the presence of patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in virtually every country studied, yet to date, specific therapy for this disease has been restricted to high- and middle-income countries where care is usually delivered within specialized referral centers. This project in Peru yielded more probable cures than expected in patients whose prognosis was poor because of chronic, highly resistant tuberculosis, extensive parenchymal damage, and previous exposure to repeated, standardized regimens that probably resulted in the amplification of drug resistance. The percentage with probable cures in our community-based, ambulatory program (83 percent) was as high as any reported in a hospital setting to date.

The seminal report on the treatment of severe multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a referral hospital in the United States documented a favorable response in 65 percent of patients.42 In reports from middle-income countries or regions, the percentages responding favorably ranged from 50 percent in Taiwan14 to more than 80 percent in Hong Kong,15 Korea,16 and Turkey.17 The only comparisons to date of studies among outpatients are from Florida, in which only 48 percent of patients completed treatment,19 and Korea and Peru (a study using the Peruvian National Tuberculosis Program standardized regimen), in which 48 percent were cured.18,20

The encouraging outcomes in Lima are probably due to several factors, some unique to our study population and others to the treatment program. Although our patients had been sick for longer and had higher-grade resistance than those in other cohorts, they were generally younger, with fewer serious coexisting conditions. Unlike the cohorts in Korea and Florida, which had high default rates,18,19 all patients in our cohort received directly observed therapy. Adverse effects, moreover, were carefully managed to ensure completion of treatment: only one patient withdrew from therapy because of adverse events.41

Therapy was more aggressive than in other studies; patients were treated with more drugs and at higher doses for longer periods.13,41,43 It is likely that this protocol mitigated, to some degree, the effect of high-grade resistance. In other cohorts, such resistance has increased the likelihood of treatment failure.42,44,45 Furthermore, the use of individualized regimens permitted patients to receive treatment with maximally effective drug combinations to which the strains had documented in vitro susceptibility, thus reducing the risk of further amplification of resistance.46,47 More than 70 percent of the patients with strains resistant to all five first-line drugs had probable cures at the completion of treatment.

Our results suggest that shortening the time to the initiation of appropriate therapy will further improve outcomes and reduce costs in a number of ways. Most important, in a setting with high cure rates with first-line treatment, patients in whom directly observed, short-course regimens have failed and patients thought to have primary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis are unlikely to benefit from the standardized retreatment regimens recommended for resource-poor settings.48 Additional courses of therapy based on isoniazid and rifampin are likely to lead to increased parenchymal damage and amplified resistance to the other first-line drugs.6 In fact, in a preliminary analysis from a larger cohort of patients in Lima, resistance to streptomycin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol was three times as likely in strains collected from patients who had been treated with two or more previous regimens as in those who had received no treatment or treatment with only one regimen.49

The treatment of patients with strains resistant to four or five first-line drugs is more difficult and more expensive than the treatment of those whose strains are sensitive to one or more of these agents. We found that patients with strains resistant to pyrazinamide and ethambutol were more likely to have poor outcomes. Moreover, the resistance pattern was the greatest determinant of the cost of therapy in this cohort, with costs per patient ranging from $504 to $32,383. At a mean of $15,681 per patient, these costs were low — approximately 10 percent of those for hospitalized patients50,51 — but well beyond the reach of most national tuberculosis programs. Advocacy work and pooled procurement have since resulted in dramatic decreases in the costs of second-line antituberculosis drugs.52 Now such patients can be treated for approximately half the earlier cost; preserved susceptibility to pyrazinamide and ethambutol further reduces the expense.

The association between signs of severe, protracted disease — elevated resting respiratory rate, bilateral involvement, low body-mass index, and anemia — and poor outcome is not unexpected and further underscores the importance of early referral for appropriate therapy.53-55 Aggressive adjuvant interventions (blood transfusion, hyperalimentation, and supplemental oxygen) may be important for reducing mortality among chronically ill patients. Even if these costly therapies prove beneficial, however, referring patients to appropriate therapy before they have manifestations of chronic disease would save both lives and resources. It would also reduce rates of transmission. Inadequately treated patients often remain infectious, transmitting multidrug-resistant strains to household members and health care workers.

The poorer outcomes for women, although not fully explained by the data available for this population, are consistent with the elevated risk of progression from infection to disease, increased mortality, and higher incidence of extrapulmonary disease among women with tuberculosis in many parts of the world.56-58 Our finding that young, childless women were less likely to respond to therapy may point to the important role of adult children, who often provided substantial support to their mothers. It is also possible that the long-standing disease afflicting young women in northern Lima was so debilitating as to have precluded reproduction for physiological and social reasons.

Our experience establishes that patients with chronic multidrug-resistant tuberculosis can be treated successfully as outpatients outside referral centers and in a resource-poor country. The DOTS-Plus model relies on community health workers supervised by nurses working in close collaboration with the country's successful National Tuberculosis Program. By moving treatment into the community, it is possible, without compromising the quality of therapy, to lower costs and reduce the risk of nosocomial spread of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.59-61 During the past two years, we have expanded the DOTS-Plus model to cover much of Lima. The costs of therapy have continued to drop even as control over the distribution of second-line drugs has been enhanced. Successful community-based therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis — and potentially for HIV62,63 — provides hope for the tens of millions of patients who are suffering from chronic infectious diseases in settings with limited health infrastructure.

Supported by Thomas J. White, the Massachusetts State Laboratory Institute, a grant (AI 03535, to Dr. Mitnick) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Eli Lilly, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

We are indebted to the Peruvian team and the Haitian team (led by Dr. Fernet Léandre) for their dedication and skill in caring for the patients, and to Edward Nardell, Rajesh Gupta, Norman Johnson, and Michaele Mikovsky for their comments on the manuscript.

Source Information

From the Program in Infectious Disease and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston (C.M., J.B., S.S., J.F., M.B., M.C.S.F., J.Y.K., P.F.); the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston (C.M., S.K., D.N., J.H.M.); Partners In Health, Boston (C.M., J.B., S.S., J.F., M.B., M.C.S.F., J.Y.K., P.F.); Socios En Salud, Carabayllo, Lima, Peru (J.B., E.P., F.A.); the Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (S.S., J.H.M., P.F.); Hospital Sergio E. Bernales, Carabayllo, Lima, Peru (E.S.); and Servicios Basicos de Salud, Comas, Lima, Peru (M.S.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Mitnick at the Program in Infectious Disease and Social Change, Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 643 Huntington Ave., 4th Fl., Boston, MA 02115, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    Pablos-Mendez A, Raviglione MC, Laszlo A, et al. Global surveillance for antituberculosis-drug resistance, 1994-1997. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1641-1649[Erratum, N Engl J Med 1998;339:139.]
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Espinal MA, Laszlo A, Simonsen L, et al. Global trends in resistance to antituberculosis drugs. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1294-1303
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Dye C, Williams BG, Espinal MA, Raviglione MC. Erasing the world's slow stain: strategies to beat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Science 2002;295:2042-2046
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Maher D, Chaulet P, Spinaci S, Harries A. Treatment of tuberculosis: guidelines for national programmes. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization 1997. (WHO/TB/97.220.)

  5. 5

    Espinal MA, Dye C, Raviglione MC, Kochi A. Rational `DOTS plus' for the control of MDR-TB. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:561-563
    Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Farmer PE, Bayona J, Becerra M, et al. Poverty, inequality, and drug resistance: meeting community needs. In: Proceedings of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease North American Region Conference, Chicago, February 27–March 2, 1997:88-101.

  7. 7

    Coninx R, Mathieu C, Debacker M, et al. First-line tuberculosis therapy and drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in prisons. Lancet 1999;353:969-973
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Garcia-Garcia ML, Ponce de Leon A, Jimenez-Corona ME, et al. Clinical consequences and transmissibility of drug-resistant tuberculosis in southern Mexico. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:630-636
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Primary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis -- Ivanovo Oblast, Russia, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999;48:661-664
    Medline

  10. 10

    Espinal MA, Kim SJ, Suarez PG, et al. Standard short-course chemotherapy for drug-resistant tuberculosis: treatment outcomes in 6 countries. JAMA 2000;283:2537-2545
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    TB/HIV: a clinical manual. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996. (WHO/TB/96.200.)

  12. 12

    Crofton J, Chaulet P, Maher D. Guidelines on the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997.

  13. 13

    Hadiarto M, Tjandra YA, Hudoyo A. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Indonesia. Chemotherapy 1996;42:Suppl 3:24-29
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Suo J, Yu MC, Lee CN, Chiang CY, Lin TP. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Taiwan. Chemotherapy 1996;42:Suppl 3:20-23
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Yew WW, Chan CK, Chau CH, et al. Outcomes of patients with multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis treated with ofloxacin/levofloxacin-containing regimens. Chest 2000;117:744-751
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Park SK, Kim CT, Song SD. Outcome of chemotherapy in 107 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid and rifampin. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:877-884
    Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Tahaoglu K, Torun T, Sevim T, et al. The treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Turkey. N Engl J Med 2001;345:170-174
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Kim HJ, Hong YP, Kim SJ, Lew WJ, Lee EG. Ambulatory treatment of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients at a chest clinic. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001;5:1129-1136
    Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Narita M, Alonso P, Lauzardo M, Hollender ES, Pitchenik AE, Ashkin D. Treatment experience of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Florida, 1994-1997. Chest 2001;120:343-348
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Suarez PG, Floyd K, Portocarrero J, et al. Feasibility and cost-effectiveness of standardised second-line drug treatment for chronic tuberculosis patients: a national cohort study in Peru. Lancet 2002;359:1980-1989
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Davies GR, Pillay M, Sturm AW, Wilkinson D. Emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a community-based directly observed treatment programme in rural South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:799-804
    Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Ridzon R, Kent JH, Valway S, et al. Outbreak of drug-resistant tuberculosis with second-generation transmission in a high school in California. J Pediatr 1997;131:863-868
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Laserson KF, Osorio L, Sheppard JD, et al. Clinical and programmatic mismanagement rather than community outbreak as the cause of chronic, drug-resistant tuberculosis in Buenaventura, Colombia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000;4:673-683
    Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Kimerling ME, Kluge H, Vezhnina N, et al. Inadequacy of the current WHO re-treatment regimen in a central Siberian prison: treatment failure and MDR-TB. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:451-453
    Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Bastian I, Rigouts L, Van Deun A, Portaels F. Directly observed treatment, short-course strategy and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: are any modifications required? Bull World Health Organ 2000;78:238-251
    Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Scientific Panel of the Working Group on DOTS-Plus for MDR-TB. Guidelines for establishing DOTS-Plus pilot projects for the management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000. (WHO/CDS/TB/2000.279.)

  27. 27

    Laserson KF, Iademarco MF. Profiling drug resistance in immigrants with tuberculosis. Chest 2000;117:623-625
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Farmer PE, Kim JY. Community based approaches to the control of multidrug resistant tuberculosis: introducing “DOTS-plus.“ BMJ 1998;317:671-674
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Farmer PE, Kim JY, Mitnick C, Timperi R. Responding to outbreaks of MDRTB: introducing “DOTS-Plus.” In: Reichman LB, Hershfield ES, eds. Tuberculosis: a comprehensive international approach. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2000:447-69.

  30. 30

    Farmer PE, Walton DA, Becerra MC. International tuberculosis control in the 21st century. In: Friedman LN, ed. Tuberculosis: current concepts and treatment. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press, 2000:475-96.

  31. 31

    Centro Panamericano de Zoonosis. Bacteriología de la tuberculosis. Nota técnica no. 27. Buenos Aires, Argentina: OPS/OMS, 1985.

  32. 32

    Kent PT, Kubica GP. Public health mycobacteriology: a guide for the level III laboratory. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control, 1985.

  33. 33

    Heifets LB. Drug susceptibility testing. Clin Lab Med 1996;16:641-656
    Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    Farmer PE, Furin JJ, Shin SS. Managing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Respir Dis 2000;21:53-56

  35. 35

    Sweetland A, Acha J, Guerra D. Enhancing adherence: the role of group psychotherapy in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in urban Peru. In: Cohen A, Kleinman A, Saraceno BE, eds. The world mental health casebook: social and mental health programs in low-income countries. New York: Kluwer Academic, 2002:51-79.

  36. 36

    Bender DA, Bender AE. Nutrition: a reference handbook. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1997.

  37. 37

    Hematologic alterations. In: Isselbacher KJ, Braunwald E, Wilson JD, Martin JB, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, eds. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. 13th ed. Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994:313-37.

  38. 38

    Weinberger SE. Principles of pulmonary medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1992.

  39. 39

    Harris EK, Albert A. Survivorship analysis for clinical studies. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991.

  40. 40

    Clayton D, Hills M. Statistical models in epidemiology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1993.

  41. 41

    Furin JJ, Mitnick CD, Shin SS, et al. Occurrence of serious adverse effects in patients receiving community-based therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001;5:648-655
    Web of Science | Medline

  42. 42

    Goble M, Iseman MD, Madsen LA, Waite D, Ackerson L, Horsburgh CR Jr. Treatment of 171 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid and rifampin. N Engl J Med 1993;328:527-532
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  43. 43

    Frieden TR, Sherman LF, Maw KL, et al. A multi-institutional outbreak of highly drug-resistant tuberculosis: epidemiology and clinical outcomes. JAMA 1996;276:1229-1235
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  44. 44

    Salomon N, Perlman DC, Friedmann P, Buchstein S, Kreiswirth BN, Mildvan D. Predictors and outcome of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:1245-1252
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  45. 45

    Agerton TB, Valway SE, Blinkhorn RJ, et al. Spread of strain W, a highly drug-resistant strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, across the United States. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:85-92
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  46. 46

    Management of tuberculosis: a guide for low income countries. 5th ed. Paris: International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2000.

  47. 47

    Portaels F, Rigouts L, Bastian I. Addressing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in penitentiary hospitals and in the general population of the former Soviet Union. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:582-588
    Web of Science | Medline

  48. 48

    Becerra MC, Freeman J, Bayona J, et al. Using treatment failure under effective directly observed short-course chemotherapy programs to identify patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000;4:108-114
    Web of Science | Medline

  49. 49

    Mitnick CD, Mukherjee J, Alcantara F, et al. Time to culture conversion on individualized therapy for MDR-TB: is previous treatment history important? Presented at the Fourth World Congress on TB, Washington, D.C., June 3–5, 2002. abstract.

  50. 50

    Outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis -- Texas, California, and Pennsylvania. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1990;39:369-372
    Medline

  51. 51

    Mahmoudi A, Iseman MD. Pitfalls in the care of patients with tuberculosis: common errors and their association with the acquisition of drug resistance. JAMA 1993;270:65-68
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  52. 52

    Gupta R, Kim JY, Espinal MA, et al. Responding to market failures in tuberculosis control. Science 2001;293:1049-1051
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  53. 53

    Turett GS, Telzak EE, Torian LV, et al. Improved outcomes for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:1238-1244
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  54. 54

    Avendano M, Goldstein RS. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: long term follow-up of 40 non-HIV-infected patients. Can Respir J 2000;7:383-389
    Medline

  55. 55

    Park MM, Davis AL, Schluger NW, Cohen H, Rom WN. Outcome of MDR-TB patients, 1983-1993: prolonged survival with appropriate therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:317-324
    Web of Science | Medline

  56. 56

    Holmes CB, Hausler H, Nunn P. A review of sex differences in the epidemiology of tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:96-104
    Web of Science | Medline

  57. 57

    Olakowski T. Assignment report on a tuberculosis longitudinal survey. Manila, Philippines: World Health Organization Regional Office for South East Asia, 1973.

  58. 58

    Groth-Petersen E, Knudsen J, Wilbek E. Epidemiological basis of tuberculosis eradication in an advanced country. Bull World Health Organ 1959;21:5-49
    Medline

  59. 59

    Kenyon TA, Ridzon R, Luskin-Hawk R, et al. A nosocomial outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:32-36
    Web of Science | Medline

  60. 60

    Rullan JV, Herrera D, Cano R, et al. Nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 1996;2:125-129
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  61. 61

    Sacks LV, Pendle S, Orlovic D, Blumberg L, Constantinou C. A comparison of outbreak- and nonoutbreak-related multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in a South African hospital. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:96-101
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  62. 62

    Farmer P, Leandre F, Mukherjee JS, et al. Community-based approaches to HIV treatment in resource-poor settings. Lancet 2001;358:404-409
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  63. 63

    Farmer P. The major infectious diseases in the world -- to treat or not to treat? N Engl J Med 2001;345:208-210
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (101)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Russell R Kempker, Sergo Vashakidze, Nelly Solomonia, Nino Dzidzikashvili, Henry M Blumberg. (2012) Surgical treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 12:2, 157-166
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    S. Majumdar, D. O'Brien, N. Hurtado, C. Hewison, P. du Cros. (2011) The ‘frozen state’ of drug-resistant tuberculosis: notes from the field in Abkhazia. Internal Medicine Journal 41:12, 805-808
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Paul H. Park, Cornelius Magut, Adrian Gardner, Dennis O. O’yiengo, Lydia Kamle, Bernard K. Langat, Nathan G. Buziba, E. Jane Carter. (2011) Increasing access to the MDR-TB surveillance programme through a collaborative model in western Kenya. Tropical Medicine & International Healthno-no
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    S Kenya, N Chida, S Symes, G Shor-Posner. (2011) Can community health workers improve adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy in the USA? A review of the literature. HIV Medicine 12:9, 525-534
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    H.-B. Xu, R.-H. Jiang, L. Li. (2011) Pulmonary resection for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 66:8, 1687-1695
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    E. Brooks-Pollock, M. C. Becerra, E. Goldstein, T. Cohen, M. B. Murray. (2011) Epidemiologic Inference From the Distribution of Tuberculosis Cases in Households in Lima, Peru. Journal of Infectious Diseases 203:11, 1582-1589
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Amr S. Albanna, Dick Menzies. (2011) Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Drugs 71:7, 815-825
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    K. Horo, É. Aka-Danguy, A. Kouassi Boko, A.S. N’gom, C.V. Gode, J.M. Ahui Brou, A.F. Motuom, T. Yacouba, F. Koante-Kone, M.T. Tcharman, N. Koffi. (2011) Tuberculose multirésistante : à propos de 81 patients suivis dans un service de pneumologie en Côte d’Ivoire. Revue de Pneumologie Clinique 67:2, 82-88
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Varinder Singh, Satnam Kaur. (2011) Multi-drug Resistant Childhood Tuberculosis. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics 78:4, 456-463
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Lan Hong, Wendy Jiang, Wei Zheng, Su Zeng. (2011) HPLC analysis of para-aminosalicylic acid and its metabolite in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissues. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 54:5, 1101-1109
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Anil Koul, Eric Arnoult, Nacer Lounis, Jerome Guillemont, Koen Andries. (2011) The challenge of new drug discovery for tuberculosis. Nature 469:7331, 483-490
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Mercedes C Becerra, Sasha C Appleton, Molly F Franke, Katiuska Chalco, Fernando Arteaga, Jaime Bayona, Megan Murray, Sidney S Atwood, Carole D Mitnick. (2011) Tuberculosis burden in households of patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet 377:9760, 147-152
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Helen Cox, Gilles van Cutsem. (2011) Household screening and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The Lancet 377:9760, 103-104
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Saurabh Mehta, Ferdinand M Mugusi, Ronald J Bosch, Said Aboud, Anirban Chatterjee, Julia L Finkelstein, Maulidi Fataki, Rodrick Kisenge, Wafaie W Fawzi. (2011) A randomized trial of multivitamin supplementation in children with tuberculosis in Tanzania. Nutrition Journal 10:1, 120
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Jae-Joon Yim. (2011) The Latest Achievements in Study of Tuberculosis. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 71:6, 395
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Potharaju Visalakshi, Jyoti Arora, Digamber Behera. (2010) Evaluation of nitrate reductase assay for rapid detection of resistance to second-line drugs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a tertiary care hospital. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 68:3, 236-240
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    José A Caminero, Giovanni Sotgiu, Alimuddin Zumla, Giovanni Battista Migliori. (2010) Best drug treatment for multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 10:9, 621-629
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    W. A. Hanekom, S. D. Lawn, K. Dheda, A. Whitelaw. (2010) Tuberculosis research update. Tropical Medicine & International Health 15:8, 981-989
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Keertan Dheda, Karen Shean, Alimuddin Zumla, Motasim Badri, Elizabeth M Streicher, Liesl Page-Shipp, Paul Willcox, Melanie-Anne John, Gary Reubenson, Darshini Govindasamy, Michelle Wong, Xavier Padanilam, Alicia Dziwiecki, Paul D van Helden, Sweetness Siwendu, Julie Jarand, Colin N Menezes, Avril Burns, Thomas Victor, Robin Warren, Martin P Grobusch, Martie van der Walt, Charlotte Kvasnovsky. (2010) Early treatment outcomes and HIV status of patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet 375:9728, 1798-1807
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Neel R Gandhi, Paul Nunn, Keertan Dheda, H Simon Schaaf, Matteo Zignol, Dick van Soolingen, Paul Jensen, Jaime Bayona. (2010) Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a threat to global control of tuberculosis. The Lancet 375:9728, 1830-1843
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Julià González-Martín, José María García-García, Luis Anibarro, Rafael Vidal, Jaime Esteban, Rafael Blanquer, Santiago Moreno, Juan Ruiz-Manzano. (2010) Documento de consenso sobre diagnóstico, tratamiento y prevención de la tuberculosis. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 28:5, 297.e1-297.e20
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Julià González-Martín, José María García-García, Luis Anibarro, Rafael Vidal, Jaime Esteban, Rafael Blanquer, Santiago Moreno, Juan Ruiz-Manzano. (2010) Documento de consenso sobre diagnóstico, tratamiento y prevención de la tuberculosis. Archivos de Bronconeumología 46:5, 255-274
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Michael E. Herce, Jacob A. Chapman, Arachu Castro, Gabriel García-Salyano, Kaveh Khoshnood. (2010) A Role for Community Health Promoters in Tuberculosis Control in the State of Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Community Health 35:2, 182-189
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Rafael Laniado-Laborín. (2010) Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: standardized or individualized treatment? The question has already been answered. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine 4:2, 143-146
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Serena Koenig, LC Ivers, S Pace, R Destine, F Leandre, R Grandpierre, J Mukherjee, PE Farmer, JW Pape. (2010) Successes and challenges of HIV treatment programs in Haiti: aftermath of the earthquake. HIV Therapy 4:2, 145-160
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Payam Tabarsi, Ehsan Chitsaz, Parvaneh Baghaei, Masoud Shamaei, Parisa Farnia, Majid Marjani, Mehdi Kazempour, Majid Amiri, Davood Mansouri, Mohammad R. Masjedi, Ali A. Velayati, Jose A. Caminero. (2010) Impact of Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis on Treatment Outcome of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients with Standardized Regimen: Report from Iran. Microbial Drug Resistance 16:1, 81-86
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    José A. Caminero. (2010) Tratamiento de la tuberculosis según el diferente patrón de resistencias. Medicina Clínica 134:4, 173-181
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Cabot, Richard C.Harris, Nancy Lee, Shepard, Jo-Anne O., Rosenberg, Eric S., Cort, Alice M., Ebeling, Sally H.Peters, Christine C., Wilson, Douglas, Hurtado, Rocío M., Digumarthy, Subba, . (2009) Case 18-2009. New England Journal of Medicine 360:23, 2456-2464
    Full Text

  29. 29

    S. Basu, G. H. Friedland, J. Medlock, J. R. Andrews, N. S. Shah, N. R. Gandhi, A. Moll, P. Moodley, A. W. Sturm, A. P. Galvani. (2009) Averting epidemics of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:18, 7672-7677
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Martien W Borgdorff, Peter M Small. (2009) Scratching the surface of ignorance on MDR tuberculosis. The Lancet 373:9678, 1822-1824
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Seung-Kyu Park, Jin-Hee Kim, Hyungseok Kang, Jeong Su Cho, Raymond A. Smego. (2009) Pulmonary resection combined with isoniazid- and rifampin-based drug therapy for patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 13:2, 170-175
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Sheela Shenoi, Gerald Friedland. (2009) Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A New Face to an Old Pathogen. Annual Review of Medicine 60:1, 307-320
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Sheela Shenoi, Scott Heysell, Anthony Moll, Gerald Friedland. (2009) Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: consequences for the global HIV community. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 22:1, 11-17
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Mandeep Jassal, William R Bishai. (2009) Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 9:1, 19-30
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Reda M. Lebcir, Jyoti Choudrie, Rifat A. Atun, Richard J. Coker. (2009) Using a decision support systems computer simulation model to examine HIV and tuberculosis: the Russian Federation. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare 5:1, 14
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    S. BASU, A. P. GALVANI. (2008) The transmission and control of XDR TB in South Africa: an operations research and mathematical modelling approach. Epidemiology and Infection 136:12, 1585
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Edward D Chan, Michael D Iseman. (2008) Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a review. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 21:6, 587-595
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Amita Jain, Pratima Dixit. (2008) Multidrug resistant to extensively drug resistant tuberculosis: What is next?. Journal of Biosciences 33:4, 605-616
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Kristina Feja, Erin McNelley, Cindy S. Tran, Joseph Burzynski, Lisa Saiman. (2008) Management of Pediatric Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis and Latent Tuberculosis Infections in New York City From 1995 to 2003. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 27:10, 907-912
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Salmaan Keshavjee, Irina Y Gelmanova, Paul E Farmer, Sergey P Mishustin, Aivar K Strelis, Yevgeny G Andreev, Alexander D Pasechnikov, Sidney Atwood, Joia S Mukherjee, Michael L Rich, Jennifer J Furin, Edward A Nardell, Jim Y Kim, Sonya S Shin. (2008) Treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Tomsk, Russia: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet 372:9647, 1403-1409
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Ritu Banerjee, Gisela F Schecter, Jennifer Flood, Travis C Porco. (2008) Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: new strains, new challenges. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 6:5, 713-724
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Carlos Acuna‐Villaorduna, Anna Vassall, German Henostroza, Carlos Seas, Humberto Guerra, Lucy Vasquez, Nora Morcillo, Juan Saravia, Richard O’Brien, Mark D. Perkins, Jane Cunningham, Luis Llanos‐Zavalaga, Eduardo Gotuzzo. (2008) Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of Introduction of Rapid, Alternative Methods to Identify Multidrug‐Resistant Tuberculosis in Middle‐Income Countries. Clinical Infectious Diseases 47:4, 487-495
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Raviglione, Mario C., . (2008) Facing Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis — A Hope and a Challenge. New England Journal of Medicine 359:6, 636-638
    Full Text

  44. 44

    Mitnick, Carole D., Shin, Sonya S., Seung, Kwonjune J., Rich, Michael L., Atwood, Sidney S., Furin, Jennifer J., Fitzmaurice, Garrett M., Alcantara Viru, Felix A., Appleton, Sasha C., Bayona, Jaime N., Bonilla, Cesar A., Chalco, Katiuska, Choi, Sharon, Franke, Molly F., Fraser, Hamish S.F., Guerra, DaliaHurtado, Rocio M., Jazayeri, Darius, Joseph, Keith, Llaro, Karim, Mestanza, Lorena, Mukherjee, Joia S., Muñoz, Maribel, Palacios, Eda, Sanchez, Epifanio, Sloutsky, Alexander, Becerra, Mercedes C., . (2008) Comprehensive Treatment of Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. New England Journal of Medicine 359:6, 563-574
    Full Text

  45. 45

    Zhaohai J. Zhu, Olga Krasnykh, Dahua Pan, Valentina Petukhova, Gengli Yu, Yinghui Liu, Huiwen Liu, Saweon Hong, Yuehong Wang, Baojie Wan, Wenzhong Liang, Scott G. Franzblau. (2008) Structure-activity relationships of macrolides against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 88, S49-S63
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Leonard V. Sacks, Rachel E. Behrman. (2008) Developing new drugs for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a regulatory perspective. Tuberculosis 88, S93-S100
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Molly F. Franke, Sasha C. Appleton, Jaime Bayona, Fernando Arteaga, Eda Palacios, Karim Llaro, Sonya S. Shin, Mercedes C. Becerra, Megan B. Murray, Carole D. Mitnick. (2008) Risk Factors and Mortality Associated with Default from Multidrug‐Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. Clinical Infectious Diseases 46:12, 1844-1851
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    J.J. Furin, H.L. Behforouz, S.S. Shin, J.S. Mukherjee, J. Bayona, P.E. Farmer, J.Y. Kim, S. Keshavjee. (2008) Expanding Global HIV Treatment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1136:1, 12-20
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    S. Keshavjee, I.Y. Gelmanova, A.D. Pasechnikov, S.P. Mishustin, Y.G. Andreev, A. Yedilbayev, J.J. Furin, J.S. Mukherjee, M.L. Rich, E.A. Nardell, P.E. Farmer, J.Y. Kim, S.S. Shin. (2008) Treating Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Tomsk, Russia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1136:1, 1-11
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Richard A. Murphy. (2008) The Emerging Crisis of Drug‐Resistant Tuberculosis in South Africa: Lessons from New York City. Clinical Infectious Diseases 46:11, 1729-1732
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Kelsey D.J. Jones, Therese Hesketh, John Yudkin. (2008) Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in sub-Saharan Africa: an emerging public-health concern. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 102:3, 219-224
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    A. Umubyeyi, L. Rigouts, I.C. Shamputa, A. Dediste, M. Struelens, F. Portaels. (2008) Low levels of second-line drug resistance among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Rwanda. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 12:2, 152-156
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Erik C. Böttger, Burkhard Springer. (2008) Tuberculosis: drug resistance, fitness, and strategies for global control. European Journal of Pediatrics 167:2, 141-148
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Jason R. Andrews, N. Sarita Shah, Neel Gandhi, Tony Moll, Gerald Friedland, . (2007) Multidrug‐Resistant and Extensively Drug‐Resistant Tuberculosis: Implications for the HIV Epidemic and Antiretroviral Therapy Rollout in South Africa. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 196:s3, S482-S490
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Arjun Suri, Kevin Gan, Stephen Carpenter. (2007) Voices from the Field: Perspectives from Community Health Workers on Health Care Delivery in Rural KwaZulu‐Natal, South Africa. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 196:s3, S505-S511
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    F. Drobniewski, S. Rüsch-Gerdes, S. Hoffner. (2007) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (EUCAST document E.DEF 8.1) − Report of the Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis of the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Clinical Microbiology and Infection 13:12, 1144-1156
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Wing Wai YEW, Chi Chiu LEUNG. (2007) Management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: Update 2007. Respirology 0:0, 071031182005003-???
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Ángel Domínguez-Castellano, Alfonso del Arco, Jesús Canueto-Quintero, Antonio Rivero-Román, José María Kindelán, Ricardo Creagh, Felipe Díez-García. (2007) Guía de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades Infecciosas (SAEI) sobre el tratamiento de la tuberculosis. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 25:8, 519-534
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Alberto Matteelli, Giovanni Battista Migliori, Daniela Cirillo, Rosella Centis, Enrico Girard, Mario Raviglione. (2007) Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis : epidemiology and control. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 5:5, 857-871
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    V. Bartu. (2007) Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the Czech Republic: strategy and therapeutic outcomes. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 26:8, 603-605
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Charles D. Wells, J. Peter Cegielski, Lisa J. Nelson, Kayla F. Laserson, Timothy H. Holtz, Alyssa Finlay, Kenneth G. Castro, Karin Weyer. (2007) HIV Infection and Multidrug‐Resistant Tuberculosis—The Perfect Storm. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 196:s1, S86-S107
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    José-Luis Portero, Maria Rubio. (2007) New anti-tuberculosis therapies. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 17:6, 617-637
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Gerald Friedland. (2007) Tuberculosis, drug resistance, and HIV/AIDS: A triple threat. Current Infectious Disease Reports 9:3, 252-261
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Jennifer Furin. (2007) The clinical management of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine 13:3, 212-217
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    David AJ Moore. (2007) Future prospects for the MODS assay in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis diagnosis. Future Microbiology 2:2, 97-101
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Marie-Laure Uffredi, Chantal Truffot-Pernot, Bertrand Dautzenberg, Muriel Renard, Vincent Jarlier, Jérôme Robert. (2007) An intervention programme for the management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in France. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 29:4, 434-439
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Yves L. Janin. (2007) Antituberculosis drugs: Ten years of research. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 15:7, 2479-2513
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Hamish SF Fraser, Christian Allen, Christopher Bailey, Gerry Douglas, Sonya Shin, Joaquin Blaya. (2007) Information Systems for Patient Follow-Up and Chronic Management of HIV and Tuberculosis: A Life-Saving Technology in Resource-Poor Areas. Journal of Medical Internet Research 9:4, e29
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    K. Chalco, D. Y. Wu, L. Mestanza, M. Muñoz, K. Llaro, D. Guerra, E. Palacios, J. Furin, S. Shin, R. Sapag. (2006) Nurses as providers of emotional support to patients with MDR-TB. International Nursing Review 53:4, 253-260
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Cesare Saltini. (2006) Chemotherapy and diagnosis of tuberculosis. Respiratory Medicine 100:12, 2085-2097
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Cynthia R Pearson, Mark Micek, Jane M Simoni, Eduardo Matediana, Diane P Martin, Stephen Gloyd. (2006) Modified Directly Observed Therapy to Facilitate Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence in Beira, Mozambique. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 43:Supplement 1, S134-S141
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Moore, David A.J., Evans, Carlton A.W., Gilman, Robert H., Caviedes, Luz, Coronel, Jorge, Vivar, Aldo, Sanchez, Eduardo, Piñedo, Yvette, Saravia, Juan Carlos, Salazar, Cayo, Oberhelman, Richard, Hollm-Delgado, Maria-Graciela, LaChira, Doris, Escombe, A. Roderick, Friedland, Jon S., . (2006) Microscopic-Observation Drug-Susceptibility Assay for the Diagnosis of TB. New England Journal of Medicine 355:15, 1539-1550
    Full Text

  73. 73

    Mohamad Reza Masjedi, Parissa Farnia, Setara Sorooch, Majid Valiollah Pooramiri, Seyed Davood Mansoori, Abolhasan Zia Zarifi, Ali AkbarVelayati, Sven Hoffner. (2006) Extensively Drug‐Resistant Tuberculosis: 2 Years of Surveillance in Iran. Clinical Infectious Diseases 43:7, 841-847
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Sonya S. Shin, Jennifer J. Furin, Felix Alcántara, Jaime Bayona, Epifanio Sánchez, Carole D. Mitnick. (2006) Long-term Follow-up for Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis. Emerging Infectious Diseases 12:4, 687-688
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Nicholas I. Paton, Yau-Ming Ng. (2006) Body composition studies in patients with wasting associated with tuberculosis. Nutrition 22:3, 245-251
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Stephen C. Resch, Joshua A. Salomon, Megan Murray, Milton C. Weinstein. (2006) Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. PLoS Medicine 3:7, e241
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Nikolai Menner, Ingo Günther, Helmut Orawa, Andreas Roth, Indal Rambajan, Jutta Wagner, Helmut Hahn, Shamdeo Persaud, Ralf Ignatius. (2005) High frequency of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Georgetown, Guyana. Tropical Medicine & International Health 10:12, 1215-1218
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Seyed Mehdi Mirsaeidi, Payam Tabarsi, Kaveh Khoshnood, Majid Valiollah Pooramiri, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar, Seyed Davood Mansoori, Heydar Masjedi, Soheyla Zahirifard, Foroozan Mohammadi, Parisa Farnia, Mohammad Reza Masjedi, Ali Akbar Velayati. (2005) Treatment of multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Iran. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 9:6, 317-322
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Jennifer J Furin, John L Johnson. (2005) Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of tuberculosis. Current Opinion in Internal Medicine 4:4, 394-399
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Thomas R. Frieden, Sonal S. Munsiff. (2005) The DOTS Strategy for Controlling the Global Tuberculosis Epidemic. Clinics in Chest Medicine 26:2, 197-205
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    Marcos Burgos, Leah C. Gonzalez, E. Antonio Paz, Effie Gournis, L. Masae Kawamura, Gisela Schecter, Philip C. Hopewell, Charles L. Daley. (2005) Treatment of Multidrug‐Resistant Tuberculosis in San Francisco: An Outpatient‐Based Approach. Clinical Infectious Diseases 40:7, 968-975
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Y. Balabanova, M. Ruddy, J. Hubb, M. Yates, N. Malomanova, I. Fedorin, F. Drobniewski. (2005) Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Russia: clinical characteristics, analysis of second-line drug resistance and development of standardized therapy. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 24:2, 136-139
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Vaira Leimane, Vija Riekstina, Timothy H Holtz, Evija Zarovska, Vija Skripconoka, Lorna E Thorpe, Kayla F Laserson, Charles D Wells. (2005) Clinical outcome of individualised treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Latvia: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet 365:9456, 318-326
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Zeynep Ceren Karahan, Figen Atalay, Meltem Uzun, Zayre Erturan, Melike Atasever, Nejat Akar. (2004) Sequence Analysis of rpoB Mutations in Rifampin-Resistant Clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from Turkey. Microbial Drug Resistance 10:4, 325-333
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    Sally M Blower, Tom Chou. (2004) Modeling the emergence of the 'hot zones': tuberculosis and the amplification dynamics of drug resistance. Nature Medicine 10:10, 1111-1116
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Sonya Shin, Jennifer Furin, Jaime Bayona, Kedar Mate, Jim Yong Kim, Paul Farmer. (2004) Community-based treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Lima, Peru: 7 years of experience. Social Science & Medicine 59:7, 1529-1539
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Tom Pelly, David AJ Moore, Robert Gilman, Carlton Evans. (2004) Recent tuberculosis advances in Latin America. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 17:5, 397-403
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Jyothi Rengarajan, Christopher M. Sassetti, Vera Naroditskaya, Alexander Sloutsky, Barry R. Bloom, Eric J. Rubin. (2004) The folate pathway is a target for resistance to the drug para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) in mycobacteria. Molecular Microbiology 53:1, 275-282
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    H. L. Behforouz, P. E. Farmer, J. S. Mukherjee. (2004) From Directly Observed Therapy to Accompagnateurs: Enhancing AIDS Treatment Outcomes in Haiti and in Boston. Clinical Infectious Diseases 38:Supplement 5, S429-S436
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Paul Farmer. (2004) Rethinking Medical Ethics: A View From Below. Developing World Bioethics 4:1, 17-41
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Francis Drobniewski, Yanina Balabanova, Richard Coker. (2004) Clinical features, diagnosis, and management of multiple drug–resistant tuberculosis since 2002. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine 10:3, 211-217
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Joia S Mukherjee, Michael L Rich, Adrienne R Socci, J Keith Joseph, Felix Alcántara Virú, Sonya S Shin, Jennifer J Furin, Mercedes C Becerra, Donna J Barry, Jim Yong Kim, Jaime Bayona, Paul Farmer, Mary C Smith Fawzi, Kwonjune J Seung. (2004) Programmes and principles in treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The Lancet 363:9407, 474-481
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    Rajesh Gupta, Alexander Irwin, Mario C Raviglione, Jim Yong Kim. (2004) Scaling-up treatment for HIV/AIDS: lessons learned from multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The Lancet 363:9405, 320-324
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    Richard J. Coker. (2004) Review: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: public health challenges. Tropical Medicine and International Health 9:1, 25-40
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    Nicole Gastineau Campos, Paul Farmer. (2003) Partners: Discernment and Humanitarian Efforts in Settings of Violence. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31:4, 506-515
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    Erik Folch, Isabel Hernandez, Maribel Barragan, Carlos Franco-Paredes. (2003) Infectious Diseases, Non???Zero-Sum Thinking, and the Developing World. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 326:2, 66-72
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    Sonya Shin, Dalia Guerra, Michael Rich, Kwonjune J. Seung, Joia Mukherjee, Keith Joseph, Rocio Hurtado, Felix Alcantara, Jaime Bayona, Cesar Bonilla, Paul Farmer, Jennifer Furin. (2003) Treatment of Multidrug‐Resistant Tuberculosis during Pregnancy: A Report of 7 Cases. Clinical Infectious Diseases 36:8, 996-1003
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    Barbara A. Noah. (2003) AIDS and Antiretroviral Drugs in South Africa: Public Health, Politics, and Individual Suffering: A Review of Brian Tilley's It's My Life. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31:1, 144-148
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Jim Yong Kim, Joia S. Mukherjee, Michael L. Rich, Kedar Mate, Jaime Bayona, Mercedes C. Becerra. (2003) From multidrug-resistant tuberculosis to DOTS expansion and beyond: making the most of a paradigm shift. Tuberculosis 83:1-3, 59-65
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    N Tsapis, D Bennett, K O’Driscoll, K Shea, M.M Lipp, K Fu, R.W Clarke, D Deaver, D Yamins, J Wright, C.A Peloquin, D.A Weitz, D.A Edwards. (2003) Direct lung delivery of para-aminosalicylic acid by aerosol particles. Tuberculosis 83:6, 379-385
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Joia S. Mukherjee, Sonya Shin, Jennifer Furin, Michael L. Rich, Fernet L??andre, J. Keith Joseph, Kwonjune Seung, Julio Acha, Irina Gelmanova, Ekaterina Goncharova, Alexander Pasechnikov, Felix Alc??ntara Viru, Paul Farmer. (2002) New Challenges in the Clinical Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice 11:6, 329-339
    CrossRef