Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Intranasal Mupirocin to Prevent Postoperative Staphylococcus aureus Infections

Trish M. Perl, M.D., Joseph J. Cullen, M.D., Richard P. Wenzel, M.D., M. Bridget Zimmerman, Ph.D., Michael A. Pfaller, M.D., Deborah Sheppard, Jennifer Twombley, R.N., Pamela P. French, M.D., M.P.H., Loreen A. Herwaldt, M.D., and the Mupirocin and the Risk of Staphylococcus aureus Study Team

N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1871-1877June 13, 2002

Abstract

Background

Patients with nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus have an increased risk of surgical-site infections caused by that organism. Treatment with mupirocin ointment can reduce the rate of nasal carriage and may prevent postoperative S. aureus infections.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether intranasal treatment with mupirocin reduces the rate of S. aureus infections at surgical sites and prevents other nosocomial infections.

Results

Of 4030 enrolled patients who underwent general, gynecologic, neurologic, or cardiothoracic surgery, 3864 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Overall, 2.3 percent of mupirocin recipients and 2.4 percent of placebo recipients had S. aureus infections at surgical sites. Of the 891 patients (23.1 percent of the 3864 who completed the study) who had S. aureus in their anterior nares, 444 received mupirocin and 447 received placebo. Among the patients with nasal carriage of S. aureus, 4.0 percent of those who received mupirocin had nosocomial S. aureus infections, as compared with 7.7 percent of those who received placebo (odds ratio for infection, 0.49; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.92; P=0.02).

Conclusions

Prophylactic intranasal application of mupirocin did not significantly reduce the rate of S. aureus surgical-site infections overall, but it did significantly decrease the rate of all nosocomial S. aureus infections among the patients who were S. aureus carriers.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Patients Included in and Excluded from the Study.
Table 1Characteristics of the 3864 Patients in the Intention-to-Treat Population and the 891 Patients with Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, According to Study Group.
Article

Each year, more than 40 million patients undergo surgery in the United States,1 and up to 20 percent of these patients acquire at least one nosocomial infection in the postoperative period.2 Infections at surgical sites are the third most common nosocomial infections and complicate 1 to 10 percent of operations.2 These infections are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, double the length of hospitalization, and increase the cost of health care in the United States by $5 billion to $10 billion annually.3-7

Staphylococcus aureus causes 25 percent of nosocomial infections and contributes substantially to the complications and costs of hospitalization.3 The ecologic niche of S. aureus is the anterior nares, and 25 to 30 percent of the population is colonized at a given time.8-10 Patients who are carriers are at higher risk for staphylococcal infections after invasive medical or surgical procedures than are those who do not carry this organism.8,10 Carriers of S. aureus are also two to nine times as likely as noncarriers to have surgical-site infections.8,10

Two percent mupirocin calcium ointment (Bactroban Nasal, GlaxoSmithKline) is a topical antibiotic that decolonizes the anterior nares.11,12 Decolonization of the anterior nares appears to prevent S. aureus infections among patients who are receiving dialysis, thereby decreasing complications and costs.13-16 Several studies have reported lower rates of surgical-site infection among patients who received mupirocin than among historical control subjects.17-19 However, the efficacy of mupirocin has not been studied rigorously among surgical patients.

We conducted a clinical trial — the Mupirocin and the Risk of Staphylococcus aureus (MARS) Study — to determine whether preoperative intranasal application of mupirocin ointment would decrease the rate of S. aureus infections at surgical sites. In addition, we assessed whether mupirocin decreased the overall rate of nosocomial infections caused by S. aureus.

Methods

Study Design and Patients

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Iowa College of Medicine. The study evaluated adults who underwent elective and nonemergency cardiothoracic, general, oncologic, gynecologic, or neurologic surgical procedures at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Iowa City between April 1995 and December 1998.

All adult patients who provided written informed consent and met the study criteria were randomly assigned to receive either 2 percent mupirocin calcium ointment or an identical-appearing placebo ointment. Randomization was stratified within each surgical service (general, gynecologic, cardiothoracic, and neurologic). A patient could be enrolled in the study only once. We excluded patients who were allergic to mupirocin or glycerin ester, patients who were pregnant or breast-feeding, patients who were participating in another clinical trial, patients who had had S. aureus infections within the previous month, those who had documented disruption of the nasal and facial bones, and those who were only having permanent central catheters inserted.

Study Medication and Follow-up

Cotton swabs were used by health care workers or the patient to apply the mupirocin or placebo to the interior of each anterior naris twice daily for up to five days before the operative procedure. Patients were monitored for a mean of 30 days (range, 25 to 35) after their operations to determine whether they acquired S. aureus infection. Study personnel examined hospitalized patients and reviewed their medical records every three to five days and telephoned discharged patients weekly during the follow-up period to determine whether the patients had signs or symptoms of infection. Patients who had signs of infection were asked to telephone the study personnel immediately.

To ascertain the patients' compliance, the study personnel reviewed medical records and diary cards listing the dates and times at which mupirocin or placebo was applied. In addition, study personnel asked patients whether they had had any side effects.

Surveillance and Definitions

Surveillance for nosocomial infections has been conducted continuously at both hospitals since 1976. The methods of surveillance have previously been validated.20,21

Nosocomial infections were identified with the use of definitions that were based on those of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.22 A surgical-site infection was defined by the occurrence of one of the following within 30 days after the operation: the wound drained purulent material; the wound drained serosanguineous material, the edges of the wound and surrounding tissues were erythematous, and the wound culture yielded a pathogen; or a physician stated in the medical record that the surgical site was infected. Stitch abscesses were not considered surgical-site infections. Three physicians who were unaware of the patients' treatment assignments reviewed the records of all patients with S. aureus infections at surgical sites to ensure that the criteria for infection were met. We considered an infection to be caused by a specific pathogen, such as S. aureus, if the patient met the criteria for nosocomial infection at a particular site and if the organism was obtained from a cultured site.

The McCabe and Jackson score (nonfatal, ultimately fatal, or fatal)23 and the Karnofsky performance status24 were used to determine the severity of underlying illness. The risk index developed by the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System was used to predict risk, as described previously.25 Scores can range from 0 to 3, and higher scores indicate a higher risk of infection.

Perioperative Care

Surgeons followed standard clinical practice and used standard prophylactic antimicrobial regimens when appropriate. Patients who were undergoing cardiac procedures showered with chlorhexidine the night before and the morning of the procedure. In the operating room, the site of each incision was cleansed with an iodophor-based product.

Microbiology

Nasal cultures were obtained by rubbing a premoistened Dacron swab in the anterior vestibule of each naris. Cultures were obtained from surgical sites when signs and symptoms of infection were observed. Standard microbiologic methods were used to identify S. aureus.26 Isolates were saved in skim milk at –70°C.

In vitro susceptibility of the isolates to oxacillin was determined by disk-diffusion testing, performed according to methods specified by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.27 Susceptibility to mupirocin was determined with the E test (AB Biodisk), according to the manufacturer's instructions. An organism was considered resistant to mupirocin if the minimal inhibitory concentration exceeded 4 μg per milliliter.28

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed as previously described.27 To be considered a match, the resulting patterns could not differ from each other by more than three bands.29

Statistical Analysis

We estimated that S. aureus infections would occur at surgical sites in 2.8 percent of patients. Overall, we calculated that 2023 patients were needed in each group to detect a 50 percent reduction in the rate of S. aureus surgical-site infections among patients who received intranasal mupirocin ointment (1.4 percent [28 patients] vs. 2.8 percent [57 patients]), given a two-tailed alpha level of 5 percent and a statistical power of 85 percent.

The rate of S. aureus infections at surgical sites was the primary end point. The secondary end points were the rates of surgical-site infections among patients with nasal carriage of S. aureus, the overall and site-specific rates of nosocomial infection, and the rates of nosocomial infection with S. aureus.

The two groups were compared with use of either Student's t-test or Wilcoxon's rank-sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Variables that differed significantly between the groups were used as covariates in a logistic-regression analysis to evaluate the effect on the outcome of mupirocin as compared with that of placebo. Odds ratios and corresponding 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated. All tests were two-tailed, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Data were analyzed at the University of Iowa in the Department of Preventive Medicine, and the sponsor did not have control over the data or the analysis.

Results

The team identified 5257 potential study participants, 4030 (76.7 percent) of whom were enrolled and underwent randomization (Figure 1Figure 1Patients Included in and Excluded from the Study.). Of these, 166 were excluded from the analysis, because they were not undergoing an eligible operation (49 in the mupirocin group and 48 in the placebo group), they received no study medication (22 and 26, respectively), or they met both exclusion criteria (8 and 13, respectively). Thus, 3864 patients (95.9 percent) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, 1933 of whom received mupirocin and 1931 of whom received placebo. Of the patients included in the analysis, 3551 (91.9 percent) completed the study. Of the 479 patients who underwent randomization but did not complete the study, 249 received mupirocin (12.4 percent of the 2012 assigned to mupirocin), and 209 received placebo (10.4 percent of the 2018 assigned to placebo; P=0.05); the remaining 21 patients did not receive any study drug.

Patients in the two groups were similar with respect to demographic and surgical characteristics, preoperative functional status, the number and types of underlying diseases, and the types of surgical procedures (Table 1Table 1Characteristics of the 3864 Patients in the Intention-to-Treat Population and the 891 Patients with Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, According to Study Group. and Table 2Table 2Surgical Characteristics of the 3864 Patients Who Completed the Study and the 891 Patients with Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus, According to Study Group.). The only significant difference between the two groups was that patients who received placebo were more likely to have had renal disease than those who received mupirocin (17.4 percent vs. 14.9 percent; odds ratio, 1.20; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.44; P=0.04).

In both groups, 82.6 percent of patients received at least three doses of the treatment regimen. Overall, nasal carriage of S. aureus was eliminated in 83.4 percent of patients who received mupirocin, as compared with 27.4 percent of patients who received placebo (P<0.001) (Table 3Table 3Preoperative and Postoperative Prevalence of Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus.). Carriage of S. aureus was eliminated from 81.3 percent of carriers (P<0.001) who received three to five doses of mupirocin and from 93.3 percent of patients who received six or more doses of mupirocin. Of those who had negative preoperative nasal cultures, 5.9 percent of placebo recipients had S. aureus in their nares postoperatively, as compared with 1.0 percent of mupirocin recipients (P<0.001). The preoperative and postoperative rates of nasal carriage remained virtually unchanged among placebo recipients (Table 3).

Among patients included in the analysis, 438 (11.3 percent) had nosocomial infections: 218 (11.3 percent) in the mupirocin group and 220 (11.4 percent) in the placebo group. The rate of infection at the surgical site was 7.9 percent in the mupirocin group (152 patients) and 8.5 percent in the placebo group (164 patients). Swabs of infected wounds were cultured in the case of 111 of 152 mupirocin recipients (73.0 percent) and 127 of 164 placebo recipients (77.4 percent). After the exclusion of patients with surgical-site infections whose wounds were not cultured, the rate of S. aureus infection at surgical sites was 2.3 percent among mupirocin recipients and 2.4 percent among placebo recipients (Table 4Table 4Overall and Staphylococcus aureus–Specific Rates of Nosocomial Infection among Patients Who Received Mupirocin and Those Who Received Placebo.).

Of the 129 patients with nosocomial infections who had nasal carriage of S. aureus, wound cultures were obtained from 107 (43 of 57 in the mupirocin group and 64 of 72 in the placebo group). The risk of nosocomial infection with S. aureus at any site among patients with nasal carriage of S. aureus was significantly lower among those who received mupirocin than among those who received placebo (odds ratio, 0.49; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.92; P=0.02) (Table 4). Seventeen carriers who received mupirocin (4.0 percent) had nosocomial S. aureus infections: 16 were surgical-site infections and 1 was a bloodstream infection. Thirty-four carriers who received placebo (7.7 percent) had nosocomial S. aureus infections: 26 were surgical-site infections, 4 were bloodstream or catheter infections, and 4 were lower respiratory tract infections.

Among placebo recipients, the odds of a surgical-site infection with S. aureus was 4.5 times as high among patients with nasal carriage as among noncarriers (95 percent confidence interval, 2.47 to 8.21; P<0.001). Logistic-regression analysis showed that renal disease (P=0.32), preoperative use of antimicrobial agents (P=0.41), and perioperative use of antimicrobial agents (P=0.32) had no significant effect on the rate of surgical-site infections with S. aureus. The risk of such an infection was significantly higher among patients whose National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System risk index was 2 (odds ratio, 3.37; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.56 to 7.29; P=0.002) or 3 (odds ratio, 8.24; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.03 to 33.52; P=0.003) than among those whose score was 0.

Of the 4030 patients who underwent randomization, 97 of the 2012 patients in the mupirocin group (4.8 percent) and 96 of the 2018 patients in the placebo group (4.8 percent) reported side effects such as rhinorrhea and itching at the application site. Five patients withdrew from the study because of adverse effects such as nasal burning, nasal bleeding, and headache; one of these patients received mupirocin, and four received placebo. Other adverse events that were not considered related to treatment were reported by 111 patients in the mupirocin group (5.5 percent) and 143 in the placebo group (7.1 percent). The death rate was similar in the two groups (2.2 percent in the mupirocin group [45 patients] and 2.7 percent in the placebo group [55 patients]). No deaths were attributed to mupirocin therapy.

Paired isolates were available from 39 of 89 patients who had surgical-site infections with S. aureus. The results of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of samples from 33 patients (84.6 percent) demonstrated that the S. aureus strain isolated from the nares was identical to that isolated from the infected site. Furthermore, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed 39 different strains among the 77 S. aureus isolates obtained from 77 patients with surgical-site infections and 8 strains that were shared by 1 or more patients. Four of the eight shared strains were isolated at approximately the same time.

A total of 150 S. aureus isolates (90 from wounds and 60 from the nares) from 77 patients with surgical-site infections and 871 isolates from the nares of patients were tested for in vitro susceptibility to mupirocin. Only 6 of 1021 S. aureus isolates (0.6 percent), obtained from six patients, were resistant to mupirocin during the four-year study period. The minimal inhibitory concentrations of mupirocin for the resistant strains ranged from 16 to 2048 μg per milliliter. Seven of the 871 isolates from patients were resistant to oxacillin (0.8 percent).

Discussion

In this large, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of S. aureus infections in surgical patients, there was no significant difference in the rate of surgical-site infections between the mupirocin and placebo groups. Several factors may explain why we did not detect a significant reduction in the rate of these infections. First, the rate of S. aureus infections at surgical sites was quite low. Second, only 47.2 percent of such infections occurred among patients with nasal carriage of S. aureus, which was substantially lower than our a priori estimate. Third, the results of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis suggested that some patients may have been infected with strains transmitted from health care workers or other patients. Perioperative prophylaxis with mupirocin would not prevent infections that originated in this manner.

In this study, however, mupirocin significantly decreased the rate of nosocomial infections due to S. aureus, specifically among patients with nasal carriage of S. aureus, the group expected to be at increased risk. Several studies have demonstrated that the risk of nosocomial infections of both the bloodstream and the lower respiratory tract is higher among patients who carry S. aureus in their nares.30-33 Taken together our results and those of previous studies suggest that intranasal mupirocin prophylaxis may prevent nosocomial S. aureus infections at several sites. Nonetheless, an additional randomized clinical trial should be performed to identify surgical patients who would benefit the most from the prophylactic use of mupirocin and to determine whether such treatment is truly cost effective.

One concern is that prophylactic use of mupirocin might lead to widespread resistance. Using the short and defined course of mupirocin prescribed by the protocol, we identified only four isolates that were resistant to mupirocin, three of which were obtained from patients who were not treated with mupirocin. Thus, a single, short course of mupirocin for preoperative prophylaxis did not appear to select for mupirocin-resistant S. aureus isolates.

Although mupirocin prophylaxis did not reduce the overall rate of S. aureus infections at surgical sites, it significantly reduced the rate of nosocomial S. aureus infections. On the basis of other studies,17,34,35 we believe that preoperative treatment with mupirocin will be cost effective in patients with nasal carriage of S. aureus.17,34,35 We conclude that mupirocin therapy is safe, has a protective effect among nasal carriers of S. aureus, and is a reasonable adjuvant agent to prevent such infections in carriers after surgery.

Supported by a research grant from GlaxoSmithKline (to Drs. Perl, Herwaldt, and Wenzel). Drs. Perl and Herwaldt have served as paid lecturers for GlaxoSmithKline.

We are indebted to the surgeons and nurses at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and the Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center and to the students, research assistants, and statisticians who worked with us during the study period, all of whom made this study possible.

Source Information

From the University of Iowa Colleges of Medicine and Public Health, Iowa City (T.M.P., J.J.C., R.P.W., M.B.Z., M.A.P., D.S., J.T., L.A.H.); the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City (L.A.H.); GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pa. (P.P.F.); and the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore (T.M.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Perl at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Division of Infectious Diseases and Department of Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, 425 Osler, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287.

Members of the Mupirocin and the Risk of Staphylococcus aureus (MARS) Study Team are listed in the Appendix.

References

References

  1. 1

    Hall M, Lawrence L. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 1996. Advance data from vital and health statistics. No. 300. Hyattsville, Md.: National Center for Health Statistics, 1998. (DHHS publication no. (PHS) 98-1250.)

  2. 2

    Horan TC, Culver DH, Gaynes RP, Jarvis WR, Edwards JR, Reid CR. Nosocomial infections in surgical patients in the United States, January 1986-June 1992. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993;14:73-80
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Emori TG, Gaynes RP. An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 1993;6:428-442
    Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Boyce JM, Potter-Bynoe G, Dziobek L. Hospital reimbursement patterns among patients with surgical wound infections following open heart surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;11:89-93
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Green JW, Wenzel RP. Postoperative wound infection: a controlled study of the increased duration of hospital stay and direct cost of hospitalization. Ann Surg 1977;185:264-268
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Nelson RM, Dries DJ. The economic implications of infection in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;42:240-246
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:725-730
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Perl TM, Golub JE. New approaches to reduce Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial infection rates: treating S. aureus nasal carriage. Ann Pharmacother 1998;32:S7-S16
    Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;10:505-520
    Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Wenzel RP, Perl TM. The significance of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and the incidence of postoperative wound infection. J Hosp Infect 1995;31:13-24
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Reagan DR, Doebbeling BN, Pfaller MA, et al. Elimination of coincident Staphylococcus aureus nasal and hand carriage with intranasal application of mupirocin calcium ointment. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:101-106
    Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Doebbeling BN, Breneman DL, Neu HC, et al. Elimination of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in health care workers: analysis of six clinical trials with calcium mupirocin ointment. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17:466-474
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Boelaert JR, De Baere YA, Geernaert MA, Godard CA, Van Landuyt HW. The use of nasal mupirocin ointment to prevent Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemias in haemodialysis patients: an analysis of cost-effectiveness. J Hosp Infect 1991;19:Suppl B:41-46
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Boelaert JR, Van Landuyt HW, Godard CA, et al. Nasal mupirocin ointment decreases the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemias in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1993;8:235-239
    Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Bloom BS, Fendrick AM, Chernew ME, Patel P. Clinical and economic effects of mupirocin calcium on preventing Staphylococcus aureus infection in hemodialysis patients: a decision analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1996;27:687-694
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Kluytmans JAJW, Manders M-JAAJ, van Bommel E, Verbrugh HA. Elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in hemodialysis patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:793-797
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Kluytmans JAJW, Mouton JW, VandenBergh MFQ, et al. Reduction of surgical-site infections in cardiothoracic surgery by elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:780-785
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Cimochowski GE, Harostock MD, Brown R, Bernardi M, Alonzo N, Coyle K. Intranasal mupirocin reduces sternal wound infection after open heart surgery in diabetics and nondiabetics. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1572-1579
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Gernaat-van der Sluis AJ, Hoogenboom-Verdegaal AM, Edixhoven PJ, Spies-van Rooijen NH. Prophylactic mupirocin could reduce orthopedic wound infections: 1,044 patients treated with mupirocin compared with 1,260 historical controls. Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69:412-414
    CrossRef | Medline

  20. 20

    Broderick A, Mori M, Nettleman MD, Streed SA, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial infections: validation of surveillance and computer modeling to identify patients at risk. Am J Epidemiol 1990;131:734-742
    Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Trilla A, Nettleman MD, Hollis RJ, Fredrickson M, Wenzel RP, Pfaller MA. Restriction endonuclease analysis of plasmid DNA from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: clinical application over a three-year period. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993;14:29-35
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128-140[Erratum, Am J Infect Control 1988;16:177.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    McCabe WR, Jackson GG. Gram-negative bacteremia. II. Clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic observations. Arch Intern Med 1962;110:856-864
    Web of Science

  24. 24

    Mor V, Laliberte L, Morris JN, Wiermann M. The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale: an examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting. Cancer 1984;53:2002-2007
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index: National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991;91:Suppl 3B:152S-157S
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH, eds. Manual of clinical microbiology. 7th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology, 1999.

  27. 27

    Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: ninth informational supplement. Vol. 19. No. 1. Wayne, Pa.: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, January 1999. (NCCLS document M100-S9.)

  28. 28

    Finlay JE, Miller LA, Poupard JA. Interpretive criteria for testing susceptibility of staphylococci to mupirocin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:1137-1139
    Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV. How to select and interpret molecular strain typing methods for epidemiological studies of bacterial infections: a review for healthcare epidemiologists. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:426-439
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    Campbell W, Hendrix E, Schwalbe R, Fattom A, Edelman R. Head-injured patients who are nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus are at high risk for Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. Crit Care Med 1999;27:798-801
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Mest DR, Wong DH, Shimoda KJ, Mulligan ME, Wilson SE. Nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to the surgical intensive care unit increases the risk of infection. Anesth Analg 1994;78:644-650
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Pujol M, Pena C, Pallares R, et al. Nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia among nasal carriers of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible strains. Am J Med 1996;100:509-516
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  33. 33

    von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, Peters G. Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. N Engl J Med 2001;344:11-16
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    VandenBergh MFQ, Kluytmans JAJW, van Hout BA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of perioperative mupirocin nasal ointment in cardiothoracic surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:786-792
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  35. 35

    Morales E, Herwaldt L, Sanford L, Bale M, Perl TM. The role of Staphylococcus aureus carriage in saphenous vein harvest site surgical wound infections. In: Program and abstracts of the 33rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans, October 17–20, 1993. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology, 1993. abstract.

Citing Articles (195)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Xan F. Courville, Ivan M. Tomek, Kathryn B. Kirkland, Marian Birhle, Stephen R. Kantor, Samuel R. G. Finlayson. (2012) Cost-Effectiveness of Preoperative Nasal Mupirocin Treatment in Preventing Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 33:2, 152-159
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    M. M. Griffith, A. E. Gross, S. H. Sutton, M. K. Bolon, J. S. Esterly, J. A. Patel, M. J. Postelnick, T. R. Zembower, M. H. Scheetz. (2012) The Impact of Anti-infective Drug Shortages on Hospitals in the United States: Trends and Causes. Clinical Infectious Diseases
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    S. A. Fritz, P. G. Hogan, G. Hayek, K. A. Eisenstein, M. Rodriguez, E. K. Epplin, J. Garbutt, V. J. Fraser. (2011) Household Versus Individual Approaches to Eradication of Community-Associated Staphylococcus aureus in Children: A Randomized Trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Wesley G. Lackey, Kyle J. Jeray, Atul F. Kamath, John G. Horneff, John L. Esterhai. 2011. Wound Infections. , 78-85.
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Pascal M. Dohmen, Alexander Weymann, Sebastian Holinski, Jörg Linneweber, Torsten Geyer, Wolfgang Konertz. (2011) Use of an Antimicrobial Skin Sealant Reduces Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Routine Cardiac Surgery. Surgical Infections111202101545002
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Nalini Rao, Barbara A. Cannella, Lawrence S. Crossett, Adolph J. Yates, Richard L. McGough, Cindy W. Hamilton. (2011) Preoperative Screening/Decolonization for Staphylococcus aureus to Prevent Orthopedic Surgical Site Infection. The Journal of Arthroplasty 26:8, 1501-1507
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    U. Seybold, S. Schubert, J.R. Bogner, M. Hogardt. (2011) Staphylococcus aureus infection following nasal colonization: an approach to rapid risk stratification in a university healthcare system. Journal of Hospital Infection 79:4, 297-301
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Andrew E Simor. (2011) Staphylococcal decolonisation: an effective strategy for prevention of infection?. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 11:12, 952-962
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    M.R. Tatterton, S. Homer-Vanniasinkam. (2011) Infections in vascular surgery. Injury 42, S35-S41
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    L. Harinstein, J. Schafer, F. D'Amico. (2011) Risk factors associated with the conversion of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation to healthcare-associated infection. Journal of Hospital Infection 79:3, 194-197
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    D. Lepelletier, J.-C. Lucet. (2011) Impact du dépistage et de la décontamination sur la prévention des infections du site opératoire à Staphylococcus aureus. Journal des Anti-infectieux
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Rachel O’Brien, Nicholas Pocock, Francesco Torella. (2011) Wound infection after reconstructive arterial surgery of the lower limbs: Risk factors and consequences. The Surgeon 9:5, 245-248
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Z. M. Mirza, A. Kumar, N. P. Kalia, A. Zargar, I. A. Khan. (2011) Piperine as an inhibitor of the MdeA efflux pump of Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Medical Microbiology 60:10, 1472-1478
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Stephanie A. Fritz, Bernard C. Camins, Kimberly A. Eisenstein, Joseph M. Fritz, Emma K. Epplin, Carey-Ann Burnham, Jonathan Dukes, Gregory A. Storch. (2011) Effectiveness of Measures to Eradicate Staphylococcus aureus Carriage in Patients with Community-Associated Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections: A Randomized Trial. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 32:9, 872-880
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Alexander J. Kallen, John A. Jernigan, Priti R. Patel. (2011) Decolonization to Prevent Infections with Staphylococcus aureus in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Review of Current Evidence. Seminars in Dialysis 24:5, 533-539
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Kalpana Gupta, Judith Strymish, Youmna Abi-Haidar, Sandra A. Williams, Kamal M. F. Itani. (2011) Preoperative Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Status, Surgical Prophylaxis, and Risk-Adjusted Postoperative Outcomes in Veterans. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 32:8, 791-796
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Hiren Pokharna, Anne Y. Chen. 2011. The Hospital and Ambulatory Care Environment. , 1-21.
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Peter A. Lio, Elaine T. Kaye. (2011) Topical Antibacterial Agents. Medical Clinics of North America 95:4, 703-721
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    M. J. Enzler, E. Berbari, D. R. Osmon. (2011) Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Adults. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 86:7, 686-701
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Karolin Graf, K. Doebler, E. Schaefer, J. Koetting, A. Haverich, P. Gastmeier, A. Beckmann. (2011) Checkliste zur Prävention sternaler Wundinfektionen. Zeitschrift für Herz-,Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie 25:3, 148-153
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Shu-Hui Tseng, Chun-Ming Lee, Tzou-Yien Lin, Shan-Chwen Chang, Feng-Yee Chang. (2011) Emergence and spread of multi-drug resistant organisms: Think globally and act locally. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection 44:3, 157-165
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Anucha Apisarnthanarak, David K. Warren, Victoria J. Fraser. (2011) Prevalence of Nasal Carriage of Mupirocin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Hospitalized Patients in Thailand. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 32:5, 522-523
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    James Slover, Janet P. Haas, Martin Quirno, Michael S. Phillips, Joseph A. Bosco. (2011) Cost-Effectiveness of a Staphylococcus aureus Screening and Decolonization Program for High-Risk Orthopedic Patients. The Journal of Arthroplasty 26:3, 360-365
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    I.F. Chaberny, K. Graf. (2011) Strategien zur Prävention von postoperativen Wundinfektionen. Der Unfallchirurg 114:3, 236-240
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Deverick J. Anderson. (2011) Surgical Site Infections. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 25:1, 135-153
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Pranavi Sreeramoju, Nabilla S. Porbandarwalla, Jorge Arango, Kerry Latham, Daniel L. Dent, Ronald M. Stewart, Jan E. Patterson. (2011) Recurrent skin and soft tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus requiring operative debridement. The American Journal of Surgery 201:2, 216-220
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Emily K. Shuman, Preeti N. Malani. (2011) Prevention and Management of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Older Adults. Drugs & Aging 28:1, 13-26
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Susan S Huang, Rupak Datta, Sheryl Rifas-Shiman, Ken Kleinman, Hilary Placzek, Julie D Lankiewicz, Richard Platt. (2011) Colonization with antibiotic-susceptible strains protects against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus but not vancomycin-resistant enterococci acquisition: a nested case-control study. Critical Care 15:5, R210
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Rachel J Gordon, Nancy Chez, Haomiao Jia, Barbara Zeller, Magda Sobieszczyk, Caitlin Brennan, Katherine B Hisert, Mei-Ho Lee, Peter Vavagiakis, Franklin D Lowy. (2010) The NOSE Study (Nasal Ointment for Staphylococcus aureus Eradication): A Randomized Controlled Trial of Monthly Mupirocin in HIV-Infected Individuals. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 55:4, 466-472
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Marin H. Kollef, Philip S. Barie. (2010) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Colonization Predicts Intensive Care Unit-Acquired MRSA Infections: True Or False?. Surgical Infections 11:6, 497-499
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    N.J.P. ten Broeke-Smits, J.A. Kummer, R.L.A.W. Bleys, A.C. Fluit, C.H.E. Boel. (2010) Hair follicles as a niche of Staphylococcus aureus in the nose; is a more effective decolonisation strategy needed?. Journal of Hospital Infection 76:3, 211-214
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    KATHARINE B. CORDOVA, NICOLE GRENIER, KYUNG HEE CHANG, RAYMOND DUFRESNE. (2010) Preoperative Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening in Mohs Surgery Appears to Decrease Postoperative Infections. Dermatologic Surgery 36:10, 1537-1540
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Courtney Hebert, Ari Robicsek. (2010) Decolonization therapy in infection control. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 23:4, 340-345
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    J. Seifert, S. Apostel, M. Frank, D. Stengel, A. Ekkernkamp. (2010) Grenzen klinischer Behandlungspfade. Der Orthopäde 39:8, 777-784
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Kiran V. Sarikonda, Scott T. Micek, Joshua A. Doherty, Richard M. Reichley, David Warren, Marin H. Kollef. (2010) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization is a poor predictor of ICU-acquired MRSA infections requiring antibiotic treatment. Critical Care Medicine1
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Ilker Uçkay, Stephan Harbarth, Robin Peter, Daniel Lew, Pierre Hoffmeyer, Didier Pittet. (2010) Preventing surgical site infections. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 8:6, 657-670
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Alexander J Kallen, Matthew J Arduino, Priti R Patel. (2010) Preventing infections in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 8:6, 643-655
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Tadayuki Iwase, Yoshio Uehara, Hitomi Shinji, Akiko Tajima, Hiromi Seo, Koji Takada, Toshihiko Agata, Yoshimitsu Mizunoe. (2010) Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp inhibits Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nature 465:7296, 346-349
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    X Bertrand, C Slekovec, D Talon. (2010) Use of mupirocin–chlorhexidine treatment to prevent Staphylococcus aureus surgical-site infections. Future Microbiology 5:5, 701-703
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    P. Berthelot, F. Grattard, C. Cazorla, J.-P. Passot, J.-P. Fayard, R. Meley, J. Bejuy, F. Farizon, B. Pozzetto, F. Lucht. (2010) Is nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus the main acquisition pathway for surgical-site infection in orthopaedic surgery?. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 29:4, 373-382
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Mark H. Wilcox, Robert C. Spencer. 2010. Healthcare-Associated Infections. .
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Sharon J. Peacock. 2010. Staphylococcus. .
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Bode, Lonneke G.M., Kluytmans, Jan A.J.W., Wertheim, Heiman F.L., Bogaers, Diana, Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina M.J.E., Roosendaal, Robert, Troelstra, Annet, Box, Adrienne T.A., Voss, Andreas, van der Tweel, Ingeborg, van Belkum, Alex, Verbrugh, Henri A., Vos, Margreet C., . (2010) Preventing Surgical-Site Infections in Nasal Carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. New England Journal of Medicine 362:1, 9-17
    Full Text

  44. 44

    Hidenobu Kawabata, Manabu Murakami, Kengo Kisa, Yuya Kimura, Masaji Maezawa. (2010) A Case of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infections in a Community Hospital. Journal of Rural Medicine 5:1, 140-143
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Adam Keene, Luciano Lemos-Filho, Michael Levi, Jose Gomez-Marquez, Jose Yunen, Hayder Said, Franklin D. Lowy. (2010) The use of a critical care consult team to identify risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and the potential for early intervention: A pilot study*. Critical Care Medicine 38:1, 109-113
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    M. Leone, F. Michel, C. Martin. (2010) Profilassi antibiotica in chirurgia. Principi generali e prescrizione dell???antibioticoprofilassi. EMC - Anestesia-Rianimazione 15:4, 1-7
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Scott Hadley, Igor Immerman, Lorraine Hutzler, James Slover, Joseph Bosco. (2010) Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization Protocol Decreases Surgical Site Infections for Total Joint Replacement. Arthritis 2010, 1-4
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Matthew E. Falagas, Vangelis G. Alexiou, George Peppas, Gregory C. Makris. (2009) Do Changes in Antimicrobial Resistance Necessitate Reconsideration of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Strategies?. Surgical Infections 10:6, 557-562
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Keiichiro Ishibashi, Kouki Kuwabara, Toru Ishiguro, Tomonori Ohsawa, Norimichi Okada, Tatsuya Miyazaki, Masaru Yokoyama, Hideyuki Ishida. (2009) Short-term intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis in combination with preoperative oral antibiotics on surgical site infection and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in elective colon cancer surgery: Results of a prospective randomized trial. Surgery Today 39:12, 1032-1039
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Peter A. Lio, Elaine T. Kaye. (2009) Topical Antibacterial Agents. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 23:4, 945-963
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    D. Rathod, N. Luqmani, S.K. Webber, I.K. Hosein. (2009) Survey of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus policies in UK eye departments. Journal of Hospital Infection 72:4, 314-318
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Daniel J. Sexton, Deverick J. Anderson, Joshua T. Freeman. (2009) Law of Unintended Consequences and Medicare's New Reimbursement Rules. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice 17:4, 212-213
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    T. Coates, R. Bax, A. Coates. (2009) Nasal decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus with mupirocin: strengths, weaknesses and future prospects. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 64:1, 9-15
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    K. Schöller, S. Licht, J.-C. Tonn, E. Uhl. (2009) Randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery—how good are we?. Acta Neurochirurgica 151:5, 519-527
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Heather L. Evans, Robert G. Sawyer. (2009) Preventing Bacterial Resistance in Surgical Patients. Surgical Clinics of North America 89:2, 501-519
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    John P. Kirby, John E. Mazuski. (2009) Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Surgical Clinics of North America 89:2, 365-389
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Deverick J. Anderson, Keith S. Kaye. (2009) Staphylococcal Surgical Site Infections. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 23:1, 53-72
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Kevin W McConeghy, Dennis J Mikolich, Kerry L LaPlante. (2009) Agents for the Decolonization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pharmacotherapy 29:3, 263-280
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Andrew E. Simor, Nick Daneman. (2009) Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization as a Prevention Strategy. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 23:1, 133-151
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    D. S. Acton, M. J. Tempelmans Plat-Sinnige, W. Wamel, N. Groot, A. Belkum. (2009) Intestinal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: how does its frequency compare with that of nasal carriage and what is its clinical impact?. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 28:2, 115-127
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Koichi Yano, Yukihide Minoda, Akira Sakawa, Yoshihiro Kuwano, Kyoko Kondo, Wakaba Fukushima, Koichi Tada. (2009) Positive nasal culture of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a risk factor for surgical site infection in orthopedics. Acta Orthopaedica 80:4, 486-490
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Todd D. Gleeson. (2008) Prevention and Control of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Disease-a-Month 54:12, 801-806
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Timothy J. Whitman. (2008) Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Disease-a-Month 54:12, 780-786
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Connie Savor Price, Allison Williams, Giby Philips, Michael Dayton, Wade Smith, Steven Morgan. (2008) Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Colonization in Preoperative Orthopaedic Outpatients. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 466:11, 2842-2847
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Miranda van Rijen, Marc Bonten, Richard Wenzel, Jan Kluytmans, Miranda van Rijen. 2008. Mupirocin ointment for preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections in nasal carriers. .
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Janet I. Andrews, Alireza A. Shamshirsaz, Daniel J. Diekema. (2008) Nonmenstrual Toxic Shock Syndrome Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Obstetrics & Gynecology 112:4, 933-938
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Deverick J. Anderson, Keith S. Kaye, David Classen, Kathleen M. Arias, Kelly Podgorny, Helen Burstin, David P. Calfee, Susan E. Coffin, Erik R. Dubberke, Victoria Fraser, Dale N. Gerding, Frances A. Griffin, Peter Gross, Michael Klompas, Evelyn Lo, Jonas Marschall, Leonard A. Mermel, Lindsay Nicolle, David A. Pegues, Trish M. Perl, Sanjay Saint, Cassandra D. Salgado, Robert A. Weinstein, Robert Wise, Deborah S. Yokoe. (2008) Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 29:S1, S51-S61
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    William J. Mauermann, Priya Sampathkumar, Rodney L. Thompson. (2008) Sternal wound infections. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 22:3, 423-436
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Kyle J. Popovich, Bala Hota, Robert A. Weinstein. (2008) Treatment of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Current Infectious Disease Reports 10:5, 411-420
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Miranda ML van Rijen, Jan AJW Kluytmans. (2008) New approaches to prevention of staphylococcal infection in surgery. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 21:4, 380-384
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Donna M. Hacek, William J. Robb, Suzanne M. Paule, James C. Kudrna, Van Paul Stamos, Lance R. Peterson. (2008) Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Decolonization in Joint Replacement Surgery Reduces Infection. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 466:6, 1349-1355
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Nalini Rao, Barbara Cannella, Lawrence S. Crossett, A. J. Yates, Richard McGough. (2008) A Preoperative Decolonization Protocol for Staphylococcus aureus Prevents Orthopaedic Infections. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 466:6, 1343-1348
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Shingo Yamamoto, Hiroki Shima, Tetsuro Matsumoto. (2008) Controversies in perioperative management and antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologic surgery. International Journal of Urology 15:6, 467-471
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    M. Buehlmann, R. Frei, L. Fenner, M. Dangel, U. Fluckiger, A. F. Widmer. (2008) Highly Effective Regimen for Decolonization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriers. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 29:6, 510-516
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Kyle J. Popovich, Bala Hota. (2008) Treatment and prevention of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections. Dermatologic Therapy 21:3, 167-179
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Susan S. Huang, Daniel J. Diekema, David K. Warren, Gianna Zuccotti, Patricia L. Winokur, Shailesh Tendolkar, Linda Boyken, Rupak Datta, Rebecca M. Jones, Melissa A. Ward, Tanya Aubrey, Andrew B. Onderdonk, Christian Garcia, Richard Platt. (2008) Strain‐Relatedness of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Recovered from Patients with Repeated Infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 46:8, 1241-1247
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    C. Kieffer, B. Cribier, G. Prevost, Y. Piemont, D. Lipsker. (2008) Les souches de Staphylococcus aureus méticilline-résistant communautaires en consultation externe hospitalière de dermatologie. Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie 135:4, 263-270
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    P. Gastmeier. (2008) Prävention nosokomialer Infektionen. Der Chirurg 79:3, 263-272
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Gary A. Noskin, Robert J. Rubin, Jerome J. Schentag, Jan Kluytmans, Edwin C. Hedblom, Cassie Jacobson, Maartje Smulders, Eric Gemmen, Murtuza Bharmal. (2008) Budget Impact Analysis of Rapid Screening for Staphylococcus aureus Colonization Among Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery in US Hospitals • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 29:1, 16-24
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    P. Muñoz, J. Hortal, M. Giannella, J.M. Barrio, M. Rodríguez-Créixems, M.J. Pérez, C. Rincón, E. Bouza. (2008) Nasal carriage of S. aureus increases the risk of surgical site infection after major heart surgery. Journal of Hospital Infection 68:1, 25-31
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    Michael H Young, Laraine Washer, Preeti N Malani. (2008) Surgical Site Infections in Older Adults. Drugs & Aging 25:5, 399-414
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Seth A. Larkin, Brian S. Murphy. (2008) Preoperative Decolonization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Orthopedics 31:1, 37-41
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Ezzat Ollah Ghaemi ., Didar Khorshidi ., Abdolvahab Moradi ., Akhter Seifi ., Masomeh Mazendrani ., Masod Bazouri ., Azad Reza Mansourian .. (2007) The Efficacy of Ethanolic Extract of Lemon Verbena on the Skin Infection Due to Staphylococcus aureus in an Animal Model. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10:22, 4132-4135
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Jane D. Siegel, Emily Rhinehart, Marguerite Jackson, Linda Chiarello. (2007) 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings. American Journal of Infection Control 35:10, S65-S164
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    Minoru Miyake, Yumiko Ohbayashi, Akinori Iwasaki, Takaaki Ogawa, Shunichiro Nagahata. (2007) Risk Factors for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Use of a Nasal Mupirocin Ointment in Oral Cancer Inpatients. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 65:11, 2159-2163
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Alex van Belkum, Marieke Emonts, Heiman Wertheim, Christa de Jongh, Jan Nouwen, Hans Bartels, Alexander Cole, Amy Cole, Peter Hermans, Hélène Boelens, Nicole Lemmens-den Toom, Susan Snijders, Henri Verbrugh, Willem van Leeuwen. (2007) The role of human innate immune factors in nasal colonization by Staphylococcus aureus. Microbes and Infection 9:12-13, 1471-1477
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Robert A Bonomo, Peter S Van Zile, Qing Li, Kenneth M Shermock, William G McCormick, Bruce Kohut. (2007) Topical triple-antibiotic ointment as a novel therapeutic choice in wound management and infection prevention: a practical perspective. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 5:5, 773-782
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Kevin Purcell, Jaime Fergie. (2007) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus : a growing public health problem. Pediatric Health 1:1, 95-105
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    Deverick J. Anderson, Daniel J. Sexton, Zeina A. Kanafani, Grace Auten, Keith S. Kaye. (2007) Severe Surgical Site Infection in Community Hospitals: Epidemiology, Key Procedures, and the Changing Prevalence of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 28:9, 1047-1053
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    J. C. Jones, T. J. Rogers, P. Brookmeyer, W. M. Dunne, G. A. Storch, C. M. Coopersmith, V. J. Fraser, D. K. Warren. (2007) Mupirocin Resistance in Patients Colonized with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit. Clinical Infectious Diseases 45:5, 541-547
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Kyle J. Popovich, Bala Hota, Robert A. Weinstein. (2007) Treatment of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Current Infectious Disease Reports 9:5, 398-407
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Sarah Klizas West, Melissa S. Plantenga, Larry J. Strausbaugh, . (2007) Use of Decolonization to Prevent Staphylococcal Infections in Various Healthcare Settings: Results of an Emerging Infections Network Survey • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 28:9, 1111-1113
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    Rafael San Juan, Fernando Chaves, Maria Jesus López Gude, Carmen Díaz-Pedroche, Joaquin Otero, Jose María Cortina Romero, Juan Jose Rufilanchas, Jose Maria Aguado. (2007) Staphylococcus aureus poststernotomy mediastinitis: Description of two distinct acquisition pathways with different potential preventive approaches. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 134:3, 670-676
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    JAN KÄLLMAN, ÖRJAN FRIBERG. (2007) Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery—general principles. APMIS 115:9, 1012-1015
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    Mary-Claire Roghmann, Peter H. Gorman, Mitchell T. Wallin, Kristen Kreisel, Simone Shurland, Judith A. Johnson. (2007) Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Community-Dwelling People With Spinal Cord Dysfunction. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 88:8, 979-983
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    K. Kanemitsu, S. Endo, K. Oda, K. Saito, H. Kunishima, M. Hatta, K. Inden, M. Kaku. (2007) An increased incidence of Enterobacter cloacae in a cardiovascular ward. Journal of Hospital Infection 66:2, 130-134
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    David Friedel, Michael Climo. (2007) Nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Clinical implications and treatment. Current Infectious Disease Reports 9:3, 201-207
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    Kerry L. LaPlante. (2007) In vitro activity of lysostaphin, mupirocin, and tea tree oil against clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 57:4, 413-418
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Dae Won Park, Min Ja Kim, Jin Ah Yang, Hye Won Jeong, Jang Wook Sohn, Byung Chul Chun. (2007) Risk factors for isolation of low-level mupirocin-resistant versus -susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patients in intensive care units. Journal of Infection 54:4, 337-342
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    Stephen G. Weber, Susan S. Huang, Shannon Oriola, W. Charles Huskins, Gary A. Noskin, Kathleen Harriman, Russell N. Olmsted, Marc Bonten, Tammy Lundstrom, Michael W. Climo, Mary‐Claire Roghmann, Cathryn L. Murphy, Tobi B. Karchmer. (2007) Legislative Mandates for Use of Active Surveillance Cultures to Screen for Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin‐Resistant Enterococci: Position Statement From the Joint SHEA and APIC Task Force • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 28:3, 249-260
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Matthew E. Falagas, Ioannis A. Bliziotis, Konstantinos N. Fragoulis. (2007) Oral rifampin for eradication of Staphylococcus aureus carriage from healthy and sick populations: A systematic review of the evidence from comparative trials. American Journal of Infection Control 35:2, 106-114
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    (2007) Prävention postoperativer Infektionen im Operationsgebiet. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 50:3, 377-393
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    Stephen G. Weber, Susan S. Huang, Shannon Oriola, W. Charles Huskins, Gary A. Noskin, Kathleen Harriman, Russell N. Olmsted, Marc Bonten, Tammy Lundstrom, Michael W. Climo, Mary-Claire Roghmann, Cathryn L. Murphy, Tobi B. Karchmer. (2007) Legislative mandates for use of active surveillance cultures to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: Position statement from the Joint SHEA and APIC Task Force. American Journal of Infection Control 35:2, 73-85
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    David J. Bowrey, Martyn D. Evans, Geoffrey W. B. Clark. (2007) Impact of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection on Outcome after Esophagectomy. World Journal of Surgery 31:2, 326-331
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    Samir S. Shah, Jessica Kagen, Ebbing Lautenbach, Warren B. Bilker, Jennifer Matro, Troy E. Dominguez, Sarah Tabbutt, J. William Gaynor, Louis M. Bell. (2007) Bloodstream infections after median sternotomy at a children’s hospital. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 133:2, 435-440
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    Andrew McKee, David Sidebotham, Patrick A. Gladding. 2007. Standard Management of Cardiac Surgery Patients. , 243-254.
    CrossRef

  107. 107

    Sean Pierre Pickering, Daniel C.R. Chen. 2007. Infectious Disease Issues in Medical Consultation. , 346-380.
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    Marta Carrillo Palau, Alberto Pardo Balteiro, Enrique Quintero Carrión. (2007) Peritonitis bacteriana por Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina en pacientes cirróticos. Gastroenterología y Hepatología 30:1, 11-14
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    Frank M.P. van Haren, Norbert Foudraine, Michael Gillham. 2007. Infection and Sepsis. , 510-536.
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    Petra Gastmeier. (2006) Postdischarge Surveillance for Surgical Site Infection: The Continuing Challenge • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 27:12, 1287-1290
    CrossRef

  111. 111

    Loreen A. Herwaldt, Joseph J. Cullen, David Scholz, Pamela French, M. Bridget Zimmerman, Michael A. Pfaller, Richard P. Wenzel, Trish M Perl. (2006) A Prospective Study of Outcomes, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated With Postoperative Nosocomial Infections • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 27:12, 1291-1298
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    Lisa S. Young, Lisa G. Winston. (2006) Preoperative Use of Mupirocin for the Prevention of Healthcare‐Associated Staphylococcus aureus Infections: A Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 27:12, 1304-1312
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    Yasuki Unemura, Yuichi Ishida, Yutaka Suzuki, Katsuhiko Yanaga. (2006) Impact of prophylactic mupirocin for radical esophagectomy. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 12:5, 257-263
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    DIM Kuijpers, NWJ Smeets, K Lapière, MRTM Thissen, GAM Krekels, HAM Neumann. (2006) Do systemic antibiotics increase the survival of a full thickness graft on the nose?. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 20:10, 1296-1301
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    V MORANGESAUSSIER, B GIRAUDEAU, N VANDERMEE, P LERMUSIAUX, R QUENTIN. (2006) Nasal Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Vascular Surgery. Annals of Vascular Surgery 20:6, 767-772
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    A. Konvalinka, L. Errett, I.W. Fong. (2006) Impact of treating Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriers on wound infections in cardiac surgery. Journal of Hospital Infection 64:2, 162-168
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    Lena M. Napolitano. (2006) Decolonization of the Skin of the Patient and Surgeon. Surgical Infections 7:supplement 3, s-3-s-15
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    Ravi Karra, Lisa McDermott, Sarah Connelly, Peter Smith, Daniel J. Sexton, Keith S. Kaye. (2006) Risk factors for 1-year mortality after postoperative mediastinitis. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 132:3, 537-543
    CrossRef

  119. 119

    James T. Lee. (2006) Surgical Site Infection Surveillance: Accomplishments and Pitfalls. Surgical Infections 7:supplement 3, s-43-s-55
    CrossRef

  120. 120

    Heiman F. L. Wertheim, Menno van Kleef, Margreet C. Vos, Alewijn Ott, Henri A. Verbrugh, Wytske Fokkens. (2006) Nose Picking and Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 27:8, 863-867
    CrossRef

  121. 121

    C. Dupeyron, B. Campillo, J.-P. Richardet, C.-J. Soussy. (2006) Long-term efficacy of mupirocin in the prevention of infections with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a gastroenterology unit. Journal of Hospital Infection 63:4, 385-392
    CrossRef

  122. 122

    Rachel J Gordon, Bianca Quagliarello, Franklin D Lowy. (2006) Ventricular assist device-related infections. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 6:7, 426-437
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    P. Kujath, R. Bouchard, J. Scheele, H. Esnaashari. (2006) Neues in der perioperativen antibiotischen Prophylaxe. Der Chirurg 77:6, 490-498
    CrossRef

  124. 124

    Ian A. Critchley. (2006) Eradication of MRSA nasal colonization as a strategy for infection prevention. Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic Strategies 3:2, 189-195
    CrossRef

  125. 125

    (2006) CME Evaluation. Surgical Infections 7:Supplement 1, s-43-s-43
    CrossRef

  126. 126

    Nabin K. Shrestha, Michael K. Banbury, Monica Weber, Roberta E. Cwynar, Cheryl Lober, Gary W. Procop, Matthew T. Karafa, Steven M. Gordon. (2006) Safety of Targeted Perioperative Mupirocin Treatment for Preventing Infections After Cardiac Surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 81:6, 2183-2188
    CrossRef

  127. 127

    Roos S.R. Choudhurry, Damian C. Melles, Kimberly Eadie, Margreet Vos, Heiman F.L. Wertheim, Henry A. Verbrugh, Alex van Belkum, Willem B. van Leeuwen. (2006) Direct detection of human Staphylococcus aureus carriage in the nose using the Lightcycler Staphylococcus kit. Journal of Microbiological Methods 65:2, 354-356
    CrossRef

  128. 128

    W.N. Fawley, P. Parnell, J. Hall, M.H. Wilcox. (2006) Surveillance for mupirocin resistance following introduction of routine peri-operative prophylaxis with nasal mupirocin. Journal of Hospital Infection 62:3, 327-332
    CrossRef

  129. 129

    Zeina A. Kanafani, Vance G. Fowler. (2006) Staphylococcus aureus Infections: New Challenges from an Old Pathogen. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 24:3, 182-193
    CrossRef

  130. 130

    E. Tacconelli. (2006) New strategies to identify patients harbouring antibiotic-resistant bacteria at hospital admission. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 12:2, 102-109
    CrossRef

  131. 131

    Akira Horiuchi, Yoshiko Nakayama, Masashi Kajiyama, Hideyasu Fujii, Naoki Tanaka. (2006) Nasopharyngeal Decolonization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Can Reduce PEG Peristomal Wound Infection. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 101:2, 274-277
    CrossRef

  132. 132

    Juliana Caierão, Laura Berquó, Cícero Dias, Pedro Alves d'Azevedo. (2006) Decrease in the incidence of mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in carriers from an intensive care unit. American Journal of Infection Control 34:1, 6-9
    CrossRef

  133. 133

    Mary R. Nicholson, Laura A. Huesman. (2006) Controlling the usage of intranasal mupirocin does impact the rate of Staphylococcus aureus deep sternal wound infections in cardiac surgery patients. American Journal of Infection Control 34:1, 44-48
    CrossRef

  134. 134

    J. Mazereeuw-Hautier. (2006) Impétigo. Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie 133:2, 194-207
    CrossRef

  135. 135

    Michael S. Avidan. (2006) Perioperative Bugs, Prions, and Virions. ASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiology 34:1, 21-29
    CrossRef

  136. 136

    Andrej Trampuz, Werner Zimmerli. (2006) Antimicrobial Agents in Orthopaedic Surgery. Drugs 66:8, 1089-1105
    CrossRef

  137. 137

    2006. Mupirocin. , 2396-2397.
    CrossRef

  138. 138

    John H. Powers. (2005) Microbiologic Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials of Infectious Diseases: Example of Acute Otitis Media Trials. Pharmacotherapy 25:12 Part 2, 109S-123S
    CrossRef

  139. 139

    Camelia E. Marculescu, Douglas R. Osmon. (2005) Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Orthopedic Prosthetic Surgery. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 19:4, 931-946
    CrossRef

  140. 140

    Philip S. Barie, Soumitra R. Eachempati. (2005) Surgical Site Infections. Surgical Clinics of North America 85:6, 1115-1135
    CrossRef

  141. 141

    Alexander J. Kallen, Chad T. Wilson, Robin J. Larson. (2005) Perioperative Intranasal Mupirocin for the Prevention of Surgical‐Site Infections: Systematic Review of The Literature And Meta‐Analysis • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 26:12, 916-922
    CrossRef

  142. 142

    Ronald L. Nichols, Robert E. Condon, Philip S. Barie. (2005) Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery—2005 and Beyond. Surgical Infections 6:3, 349-361
    CrossRef

  143. 143

    S.-M. Lim, S. A. R. Webb. (2005) Nosocomial bacterial infections in Intensive Care Units. I: Organisms and mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Anaesthesia 60:9, 887-902
    CrossRef

  144. 144

    Thomas R. Talbot. (2005) Diabetes mellitus and cardiothoracic surgical site infections. American Journal of Infection Control 33:6, 353-359
    CrossRef

  145. 145

    William L. Holman, Salpy V. Pamboukian, Margaret Blood, Jose A. Tallaj, David C. McGiffin, James K. Kirklin. (2005) Managing Device Infections: Are We Progressing or Is Infection an Insurmountable Obstacle?. ASAIO Journal 51:4, 452-455
    CrossRef

  146. 146

    Adam Keene, Peter Vavagiakis, Mei‐Ho Lee, Kathryn Finnerty, Deborah Nicolls, Christian Cespedes, Bianca Quagliarello, Mary Ann Chiasson, David Chong, Franklin D. Lowy. (2005) Staphylococcus aureus Colonization and the Risk of Infection in Critically Ill Patients • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 26:7, 622-628
    CrossRef

  147. 147

    John J. Engemann, Joelle Y. Friedman, Shelby D. Reed, Robert I. Griffiths, Lynda A. Szczech, Keith S. Kaye, Martin E. Stryjewski, L. Barth Reller, Kevin A. Schulman, G. Ralph Corey, Vance G. Fowler. (2005) Clinical Outcomes and Costs Due to Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Among Patients Receiving Long‐Term Hemodialysis • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 26:6, 534-539
    CrossRef

  148. 148

    Matthias Trautmann, Philipp M. Lepper, Mathias Haller. (2005) Ecology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the intensive care unit and the evolving role of water outlets as a reservoir of the organism. American Journal of Infection Control 33:5, S41-S49
    CrossRef

  149. 149

    Dale W. Bratzler, Peter M. Houck. (2005) Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. The American Journal of Surgery 189:4, 395-404
    CrossRef

  150. 150

    Guilherme Santoro-Lopes, rika Ferraz de Gouva, Rodrigo Carreira M. Monteiro, Rodrigo Castelo Branco, Jos Rodolfo Rocco, Mrcia Halpern, Adriana Lcia Pires Ferreira, Elaine Gama Pessoa de Arajo, Samanta T. Basto, Vinicius Gomes Silveira, Joaquim Ribeiro-Filho. (2005) Colonization with methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus after liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation 11:2, 203-209
    CrossRef

  151. 151

    Angelo Pan, Giuseppe Carnevale, Patrizia Catenazzi, Paolo Colombini, Luciano Crema, Lucia Dolcetti, Lucio Ferrari, Placido Mondello, Liana Signorini, Carmine Tinelli, Eugenia Quiros Roldan, Giampiero Carosi. (2005) Trends in Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bloodstream Infections: Effect of the MRSA “Search and Isolate” Strategy in a Hospital in Italy With Hyperendemic MRSA • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 26:2, 127-133
    CrossRef

  152. 152

    Christophe Camus, Eric Bellissant, V??ronique Sebille, Dominique Perrotin, Bernard Garo, Annick Legras, Anne Renault, Pascal Le Corre, Pierre-Yves Donnio, Arnaud Gacouin, Yves Le Tulzo, R??mi Thomas. (2005) Prevention of acquired infections in intubated patients with the combination of two decontamination regimens. Critical Care Medicine 33:2, 307-314
    CrossRef

  153. 153

    Sharon F. Chen. (2005) Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 24:1, 79-80
    CrossRef

  154. 154

    Sherry L. Maragh, Clark C. Otley, Randall K. Roenigk, P. Kim Phillips. (2005) Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Dermatologic Surgery: Updated Guidelines. Dermatologic Surgery 31:1, 83-93
    CrossRef

  155. 155

    John A. Jernigan. (2004) Eradicating nasal carriage of staphylococcus aureus as a strategy for preventing health care-associated infections in nonsurgical patients. Current Infectious Disease Reports 6:6, 417-419
    CrossRef

  156. 156

    Philip M. Polgreen, Loreen A. Herwaldt. (2004) Staphylococcus aureus colonization and nosocomial infections: Implications for prevention. Current Infectious Disease Reports 6:6, 435-441
    CrossRef

  157. 157

    Richard H. Drew. (2004) Key References in Infectious Diseases Pharmacotherapy. Pharmacotherapy 24:11, 1586-1593
    CrossRef

  158. 158

    K.B. Laupland, A.W. Kirkpatrick, D.L. Church, T. Ross, D.B. Gregson. (2004) Intensive-care-unit-acquired bloodstream infections in a regional critically ill population. Journal of Hospital Infection 58:2, 137-145
    CrossRef

  159. 159

    Peter A Lio, Elaine T Kaye. (2004) Topical antibacterial agents. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 18:3, 717-733
    CrossRef

  160. 160

    Pierre Vaudaux, Jacques Schrenzel. (2004) Nosocomial bacteraemia caused by Staphylococcus aureus. The Lancet 364:9435, 644-645
    CrossRef

  161. 161

    W. B. Dale, M. H. Peter, . (2004) Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Surgery: An Advisory Statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clinical Infectious Diseases 38:12, 1706-1715
    CrossRef

  162. 162

    Caroline Marshall, Thomas Kossmann, Steve Wesselingh, Denis Spelman. (2004) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and beyond: what's new in the world of the 'golden staph'?. ANZ Journal of Surgery 74:6, 465-469
    CrossRef

  163. 163

    Gerd Döring, Niels Hoiby. (2004) Early intervention and prevention of lung disease in cystic fibrosis: a European consensus. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 3:2, 67-91
    CrossRef

  164. 164

    Michael Kresken, Dieter Hafner, Franz-Josef Schmitz, Thomas A Wichelhaus. (2004) Prevalence of mupirocin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis: results of the Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Study of the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy, 2001. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 23:6, 577-581
    CrossRef

  165. 165

    Michelle D. Taylor, Lena M. Napolitano. (2004) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Vascular Surgery: Increasing Prevalence. Surgical Infections 5:2, 180-187
    CrossRef

  166. 166

    John A. Jernigan. (2004) Is the Burden of Staphylococcus aureus Among Patients With Surgical‐Site Infections Growing? • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 25:6, 457-460
    CrossRef

  167. 167

    Loreen A. Herwaldt, Joseph J. Cullen, Pamela French, Jianfang Hu, Michael A. Pfaller, Richard P. Wenzel, Trish M. Perl. (2004) Preoperative Risk Factors for Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 25:6, 481-484
    CrossRef

  168. 168

    Mamta Sharma, Dorine Berriel‐Cass, Joseph Baran. (2004) Sternal Surgical‐Site Infection Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Prevalence, Microbiology, and Complications During a 42‐Month Period • . Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 25:6, 468-471
    CrossRef

  169. 169

    Luis Alou, Fabio Cafini, David Sevillano, Irune Unzueta, José Prieto. (2004) In vitro activity of mupirocin and amoxicillin-clavulanate alone and in combination against staphylococci including those resistant to methicillin. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 23:5, 513-516
    CrossRef

  170. 170

    Claudia Martorell, Richard Engelman, Ann Corl, Richard B Brown. (2004) Surgical site infections in cardiac surgery: an 11-year perspective. American Journal of Infection Control 32:2, 63-68
    CrossRef

  171. 171

    C Marshall, S Wesselingh, M McDonald, D Spelman. (2004) Control of endemic MRSA—what is the evidence? A personal view. Journal of Hospital Infection 56:4, 253-268
    CrossRef

  172. 172

    E. Tacconelli, Y. Carmeli, A. Aizer, G. Ferreira, M. G. Foreman, E. M. C. D'Agata. (2003) Mupirocin Prophylaxis to Prevent Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Patients Undergoing Dialysis: A Meta-analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 37:12, 1629-1638
    CrossRef

  173. 173

    L. Mody, C. A. Kauffman, S. A. McNeil, A. T. Galecki, S. F. Bradley. (2003) Mupirocin-Based Decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus Carriers in Residents of 2 Long-Term Care Facilities: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases 37:11, 1467-1474
    CrossRef

  174. 174

    Trish M Perl. (2003) Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus infections among surgical patients: Beyond traditional perioperative prophylaxis. Surgery 134:5, S10-S17
    CrossRef

  175. 175

    Loreen A Herwaldt. (2003) Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and surgical-site infections. Surgery 134:5, S2-S9
    CrossRef

  176. 176

    Michael K Banbury. (2003) Experience in prevention of sternal wound infections in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. Surgery 134:5, S18-S22
    CrossRef

  177. 177

    Mark A Wilson. (2003) Skin and soft-tissue infections: impact of resistant gram-positive bacteria. The American Journal of Surgery 186:5, 35-41
    CrossRef

  178. 178

    K. B. Laupland, J. M. Conly. (2003) Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Colonization and Prophylaxis for Infection with Topical Intranasal Mupirocin: An Evidence-Based Review. Clinical Infectious Diseases 37:7, 933-938
    CrossRef

  179. 179

    Henrik Stender. (2003) PNA FISH: an intelligent stain for rapid diagnosis of infectious diseases. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 3:5, 649-655
    CrossRef

  180. 180

    S Harbarth, H Sax, P Gastmeier. (2003) The preventable proportion of nosocomial infections: an overview of published reports. Journal of Hospital Infection 54:4, 258-266
    CrossRef

  181. 181

    Inge HM van Loo, Peter HJ van Keulen, Jan AJW Kluytmans. (2003) Recent developments in the prevention of surgical site infections: preoperative screening and postoperative surveillance. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 1:2, 261-266
    CrossRef

  182. 182

    M.H Wilcox, J Hall, H Pike, P.A Templeton, W.N Fawley, P Parnell, P Verity. (2003) Use of perioperative mupirocin to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) orthopaedic surgical site infections. Journal of Hospital Infection 54:3, 196-201
    CrossRef

  183. 183

    William L Holman, Barry K Rayburn, David C McGiffin, Brian A Foley, Raymond L Benza, Robert C Bourge, Laura J Pinderski, James K Kirklin. (2003) Infection in ventricular assist devices: prevention and treatment. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 75:6, S48-S57
    CrossRef

  184. 184

    Michael Collins, Thomas A. Tami. (2003) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the practice of otolaryngology–an emerging community acquired organism?. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 11:3, 179-183
    CrossRef

  185. 185

    Franklin D. Lowy. (2003) Antimicrobial resistance: the example of Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Clinical Investigation 111:9, 1265-1273
    CrossRef

  186. 186

    Nabin K. Shrestha, Kenneth M. Shermock, Steven M. Gordon, Marion J. Tuohy, Deborah A. Wilson, Roberta E. Cwynar, Michael K. Banbury, David L. Longworth, Carlos M. Isada, Steven D. Mawhorter, Gary W. Procop. (2003) Predictive Value And Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis Of A Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction For Preoperative Detection of Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 24:5, 327-333
    CrossRef

  187. 187

    Carlene A. Muto, John A. Jernigan, Belinda E. Ostrowsky, Hervé M. Richet, William R. Jarvis, John M. Boyce, Barry M. Farr. (2003) SHEA Guideline for Preventing Nosocomial Transmission of Multidrug‐Resistant Strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 24:5, 362-386
    CrossRef

  188. 188

    Farrin A. Manian, P. Lynn Meyer, Janice Setzer, Diane Senkel. (2003) Surgical Site Infections Associated with Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Do Postoperative Factors Play a Role?. Clinical Infectious Diseases 36:7, 863-868
    CrossRef

  189. 189

    Philip S. Barie. (2002) Surgical Site Infections: Epidemiology and Prevention. Surgical Infections 3:s1, s9-s21
    CrossRef

  190. 190

    Tae Chong, Robert Sawyer. (2002) Update on the epidemiology and prevention of surgical site infections. Current Infectious Disease Reports 4:6, 484-490
    CrossRef

  191. 191

    (2002) Intranasal Mupirocin to Prevent Postoperative Infections. New England Journal of Medicine 347:15, 1207-1208
    Full Text

  192. 192

       . (2002) Mupirocine-neuszalf ter preventie van Staphyloccus-aureus-infecties bij operaties. Medisch-Farmaceutische Mededelingen 40:10, 297-297
    CrossRef

  193. 193

    J. John Weems, Luna B. Beck. (2002) Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus as a risk factor for skin and soft tissue infections. Current Infectious Disease Reports 4:5, 420-425
    CrossRef

  194. 194

    M. D. Kalmeijer, H. Coertjens, P. M. van Nieuwland‐Bollen, D. Bogaers‐Hofman, G. A. J. de Baere, A. Stuurman, A. van Belkum, J. A. J. W. Kluytmans. (2002) Surgical Site Infections in Orthopedic Surgery: The Effect of Mupirocin Nasal Ointment in a Double‐Blind, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Study. Clinical Infectious Diseases 35:4, 353-358
    CrossRef

  195. 195

    Farr, Barry M., . (2002) Mupirocin to Prevent S. aureus Infections. New England Journal of Medicine 346:24, 1905-1906
    Full Text

Letters