Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Editorial

Toward More Uniform Conflict Disclosures — The Updated ICMJE Conflict of Interest Reporting Form

Jeffrey M. Drazen, M.D., Peter W. de Leeuw, M.D., Ph.D., Christine Laine, M.D., M.P.H., Cynthia Mulrow, M.D., M.Sc., Catherine D. DeAngelis, M.D., M.P.H., Frank A. Frizelle, M.B., Ch.B., Fiona Godlee, M.B., B.Chir., B.Sc., Charlotte Haug, M.D., Ph.D., M.Sc., Paul C. Hébert, M.D., M.H.Sc., Astrid James, M.B., B.S., B.Sc., Sheldon Kotzin, M.L.S., Ana Marusic, M.D., Ph.D., Humberto Reyes, M.D., Jacob Rosenberg, M.D., D.Sc., Peush Sahni, M.S., Ph.D., Martin B. Van Der Weyden, M.D., and Getu Zhaori, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2010; 363:188-189July 8, 2010

Article

The great variability in the processes that different journals use to ask about and report authors' potential conflicts of interest creates confusion for authors, readers, and the public. To help lessen this confusion, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) developed an electronic uniform disclosure form and placed it in the public domain in October 2009. The ICMJE member journals piloted the form, encouraged other journals to use it, and invited feedback. We recognized that the reporting of competing interests is complex and nuanced and sometimes contentious and thus anticipated modifying the form on the basis of feedback received. We are grateful to the many authors, editors, and other interested parties who took the time to comment on the form and its implementation. The issues raised ranged from technical problems about the correct deployment of the form (to function, it requires the user to download the free Adobe Reader, version 8.0 or higher [Adobe Systems]) to concerns about the ethics of inquiring about nonfinancial associations. The Committee considered these valuable comments and revised the form at our most recent meeting.

We made several modifications. The major change in the reporting instrument is the removal of the queries about potential competing interests of authors' spouses and minor children and about nonfinancial competing interests. We made this change on the basis of the largely negative feedback that we received about these sections. People who commented about this issue made it clear that there is immense difficulty in defining competing interests beyond those that involve the direct exchange of money from an interested party to an individual author or the author's institution. Because the Committee continues to believe that there are situations in which indirect or nonfinancial factors could influence (or appear to influence) the conduct or interpretation of work, we replaced the specific questions with a single open-ended query (new Section 4) that asks, “Are there any other relationships or activities that readers could perceive to influence, or that give the appearance of potentially influencing, what you wrote in the submitted work?” This change places the onus on the person completing the form to identify and report appropriate nonfinancial competing interests. It has the advantage of being less intrusive than the previous queries, while providing a locus where authors can report nonfinancial relationships that may be perceived as potential conflicts of interest.

In response to comments about the clarity of the form, each field in the form now has a numeric designation. We have modified the language in the instructions and in the individual queries. To make the form more useful to nonnative English speakers, we are creating a glossary of terms used in the form and will be posting guidelines for translation of the form's instructions into multiple languages. The translation of this form is particularly challenging because translations must capture the essence of the queries rather than their literal meaning. The glossary and instructions will be available at www.icmje.org in the next few months; translations will be posted on the ICMJE Web site as they become available.

The new form, in English, is currently available on the ICMJE Web site and the Web sites of our member journals. Authors who have completed the older version of the form in conjunction with a journal submission need not complete the new form, but the new form will be the standard for new submissions. We welcome continued input from the user community. Comments can be sent via the “contact us” link at www.icmje.org. The Committee will consider comments received before May 1, 2011, when we prepare the next iteration of the uniform conflict of interest disclosure form.

The complexity, subjectivity, and emotionality of conflict disclosure ensure that some will consider this vehicle for reporting to be excessively burdensome, while others will think it falls short in one area or another. We cannot, however, let the perfect be the enemy of the good. We hope that the revised ICMJE form will be another step toward simplifying and standardizing reporting of conflicts of interest. A more uniform reporting process will alleviate the confusion that prevails when multiple journals use different reporting formats and will ease the reporting burden on the members of the biomedical research community so they can pursue the research that will improve the care that we can deliver to our patients. With these thoughts in mind, we encourage all journals to adopt the new version of the uniform disclosure form.

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.

This article (10.1056/NEJMe1006030) was published on July 1, 2010, at NEJM.org.

Source Information

Editor-in-Chief, New England Journal of Medicine

Editor-in-Chief, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine)

Editor, Annals of Internal Medicine

Secretary, ICMJE, Senior Deputy Editor, Annals of Internal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief, JAMA

Editor-in-Chief, The New Zealand Medical Journal

Editor-in-Chief, BMJ

Editor-in-Chief, Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening (Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association)

Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Medical Association Journal

Deputy Editor, The Lancet

Associate Director for Library Operations, National Library of Medicine

Editor-in-Chief, Croatian Medical Journal

Editor, Revista Médica de Chile

Editor, Journal of the Danish Medical Association

Representative and Past President, World Association of Medical Editors

Editor, The Medical Journal of Australia

Editor-in-Chief, Chinese Medical Journal

Citing Articles (13)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Robert D. Greenberg. (2012) Conflicts of Interest: can a physician serve two masters?. Clinics in Dermatology 30:2, 160-173
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Aaron S. Kesselheim, Joy L. Lee, Jerry Avorn, Amber Servi, William H. Shrank, Niteesh K. Choudhry. (2012) Conflict of interest in oncology publications. Cancer 118:1, 188-195
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Stephan Sahm. (2011) Of mugs, meals and more: the intricate relations between physicians and the medical industry. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Lilit Ayvazyan, Heather Blackmore, George D. Kitas. (2011) Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatology International 31:11, 1409-1417
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Paul Riss. (2011) The peer review process I: submitting a manuscript. International Urogynecology Journal
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    (2011) CardioPulse Articles * The EHRA: a short history and a long list of achievements * Do cardiologists follow their own advice? * Science is Japan's lifeline for the future * The Editors' Network of the European Society of Cardiology * Announcement * The 'Best of the European Heart Journal' in Hungary * People's corner: new position * Frank A. Flachskampf--promotion to Professor. European Heart Journal 32:8, 915-922
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Thomas J. Liesegang, Andrew P. Schachat. (2011) Enhanced Reporting of Potential Conflicts of Interest: Rationale and New Form. American Journal of Ophthalmology 151:3, 391-393.e5
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Joel Lexchin. (2011) Those Who Have the Gold Make the Evidence: How the Pharmaceutical Industry Biases the Outcomes of Clinical Trials of Medications. Science and Engineering Ethics
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    (2011) Guidelines for Immune Thrombocytopenia. New England Journal of Medicine 364:6, 580-581
    Full Text

  10. 10

    E. E. Wall. (2011) Summa cum fraude: how to prevent scientific misconduct. Netherlands Heart Journal 19:2, 57-58
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    A. Trébucq, H. Maisonneuve. (2010) Intérêts potentiels et publications: exiger la transparence et refuser la chasse aux sorcières. Oncologie 12:11-12, 647-650
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    G. Jackson. (2010) Never Mind the Content, Measure the Impact: Spin Bowling for Journal Impact Factors vs. the Importance of Patient Impact. International Journal of Clinical Practice 64:11, 1461-1462
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Sunil Kripalani, Mark V. Williams. (2010) Author responsibilities and disclosures at the journal of hospital medicine. Journal of Hospital Medicine 5:6, 320-322
    CrossRef