Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Correspondence

Correction

Human H5N1 Influenza

N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1375-1377March 29, 2007

Article

To the Editor:

As is consistent with previous studies of outbreaks of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus, the epidemiologic investigations reported by Kandun et al. in Indonesia and by Oner et al. in Turkey (Nov. 23 issue)1,2 show that H5N1 virus primarily infects young people (median age, 9 years). As of late November 2006, 258 cases of human H5N1 virus infection had been identified. More than half of the patients were under the age of 20 years (median age, 18.5 years), and 25% of them were under the age of 10 years. Although both studies report clusters within families and cite exposure to dead poultry as a common risk factor, it is unlikely that the intensity of exposure differed among household members. Rather, higher incidence rates in children may represent age-dependent differences in host susceptibility to H5N1 virus infection. Human infection is mediated by a receptor recognized by avian influenza (α2,3-linked sialic acid) that is expressed in the lower respiratory tract.3 In children this receptor may be expressed in the upper airway, increasing the risk of infection. Indeed, α2,3-linked sialic acids are homogeneously distributed in the human fetal lung, and the expression of the receptor appears to decrease with age.4

Miguel Goicoechea, M.D.
University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103

4 References
  1. 1

    Kandun IN, Wibisono H, Sedyaningsih ER, et al. Three Indonesian clusters of H5N1 virus infection in 2005. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2186-2194
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Oner AF, Bay A, Arslan S, et al. Avian influenza A (H5N1) infection in eastern Turkey in 2006. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2179-2185
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Shinya K, Ebina M, Yamada S, Ono M, Kasai N, Kawaoka Y. Avian flu: influenza virus receptors in the human airway. Nature 2006;440:435-436
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Cerna A, Janega P, Martanovic P, Lisy M, Babal P. Changes in sialic acid expression in the lung during intrauterine development of the human fetus. Acta Histochem 2002;104:339-342
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

To the Editor:

Human H5N1 virus infection can be difficult to diagnose. In the report by Oner et al., the results of nasopharyngeal swabs were mostly negative. Positive results were obtained on polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assays of tracheal aspirates and lung-tissue samples. These results are predictable, since the receptors for the attachment of H5N1 virus are located predominantly around alveoli and terminal bronchioles and become progressively more rare toward the trachea.1

Jeanne A. Pawitan, M.D., Ph.D.
University of Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia

1 References
  1. 1

    van Riel D, Munster VJ, de Wit E, et al. H5N1 virus attachment to lower respiratory tract. Science 2006;312:399-399
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

To the Editor:

The Perspective article by Webster and Govorkova1 accompanying the reports by Kandun et al. and Oner et al. is perhaps the best available published summary of the emergence, evolution, and proliferation of H5N1 virus, an important emerging animal and human pathogen. Nonetheless, the time line that the authors provide does not include the four retrospectively confirmed cases of human H5N1 virus infection that occurred in Korea between December 2003 and March 2004 and another five confirmed cases that occurred in Japan during February and March 2004 among poultry workers and persons involved in the culling of infected poultry. The cases in Japan were not reported until 10 months after they had been confirmed, and the cases in Korea were not confirmed until more than 2 years after they had occurred. The existence of these often overlooked nonfatal cases of human H5N1 virus infection illustrate the many impediments we face in refining our understanding of the epidemiology, risks, and potential effects of this disease in human populations.

Joseph P. Dudley, Ph.D.
Science Applications International, Arlington, VA 22203

1 References
  1. 1

    Webster RG, Govorkova EA. H5N1 influenza -- continuing evolution and spread. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2174-2177
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

Author/Editor Response

That the expression of α2,3-linked sialic acid receptor might be a reason for the high incidence of the disease in young patients is theoretical. To assess this concern, an understanding of the culture and traditions of the countries where avian influenza outbreaks have occurred is required. In the families of the patients in our study, exposure was more intensive in children than in their parents. People in this area of Turkey do not believe that the illness of chickens can be transmitted to humans. Therefore, the children played with the poultry, kissing and sleeping with them even when the birds were ill. However, the parents typically had contact with the chickens only while preparing them for cooking and eating them. We believe that contact with the secretions of the sick birds is an important risk factor and that children had more intensive contact with the poultry. Furthermore, if there were a relationship between viral-receptor intensity in young children and disease incidence, we would expect to see more cases in the first years of life, which has not been observed. Cerna et al.1 have studied sialic acid expression in relation to developmental maturity of the lung and have shown that there is a slight decrease in sialic acid expression in the lungs before birth. Therefore, we think that children are affected by avian influenza viruses by the same mechanism that mediates adult infection.

We agree with Pawitan that human H5N1 virus infection is difficult to diagnose. Although the results of some nasopharyngeal swabs were negative in our study, all tracheal aspirates and lung-tissue samples were positive on real-time PCR assay. As Pawitan states, the receptors for the attachment of avian influenza virus are located mostly around alveoli and terminal bronchioles.2

Ahmet Faik Oner, M.D.
Yuzuncu Yil University, 65200 Van, Turkey

Mehmet Ceyhan, M.D.
Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey

Hayrettin Akdeniz, M.D.
Yuzuncu Yil University, 65200 Van, Turkey

2 References
  1. 1

    Cerna A, Janega P, Martanovic P, Lisy M, Babal P. Changes in sialic acid expression in the lung during intrauterine development of the human fetus. Acta Histochem 2002;104:339-342
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Shinya K, Ebina M, Yamada S, Ono M, Kasai N, Kawaoka Y. Avian flu: influenza virus receptors in the human airway. Nature 2006;440:435-436
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Author/Editor Response

Most human cases of highly pathogenic H5N1 virus infection have been sporadic to date, but family clusters have occurred in several countries. Direct physical contact with sick or dead poultry has been identified as the primary risk factor.1,2 The reported intensity of exposure to diseased or dead poultry can vary substantially among family members in households of patients who have H5N1 virus infection. In our study, all three patients and the unaffected family members in cluster 3 were similarly exposed to diseased or dead poultry, as were many neighbors who never became ill. No patients or unaffected family members in clusters 1 and 2 had known contact with sick or dead poultry. In addition to exposure to H5N1 virus, susceptibility to human infection with H5N1 viruses could be mediated by age or immunologic, genetic, or other factors. The question of whether genetic or other factors, such as those affecting the expression of the host inflammatory response,3 might influence the severity of disease after H5N1 virus infection should also be investigated.

In our study, throat specimens had a higher yield for detecting H5N1 virus than did nasal specimens, and H5N1 viral RNA levels were higher in throat specimens than in nasal specimens in another study.3 For detection of H5N1 viral RNA by real-time PCR in patients with suspected H5N1 virus infection, specimens should be collected from different respiratory sites on multiple days, including nasal and throat swabs from patients who are not undergoing mechanical ventilation and endotracheal aspirates from intubated patients.4 Testing of nasal-swab specimens from patients with suspected H5N1 virus infection can also help detect human influenza A and B viruses that bind to α2,6-linked sialic acid receptors located primarily in the upper respiratory tract.5

Two minor inaccuracies appear on page 2188 of our article. In Figure 1, the hospitalization date for Patient 2A should have been 9/6, rather than 9/3. On the same page, under the heading “Cluster 2,” line 3 of the second paragraph should have read, “Four days after his aunt was hospitalized, he had onset of fever,” rather than “three days.” We regret the errors.

I. Nyoman Kandun, M.D., M.P.H.
Ministry of Health, Jakarta 10560, Indonesia

Endang R. Sedyaningsih, M.D., D.P.H.
National Institute of Health Research and Development, Jakarta 10560, Indonesia

Timothy M. Uyeki, M.D., M.P.H.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333

5 References
  1. 1

    Areechokchai D, Jiraphongsa C, Laosiritaworn Y, Hanshaoworakul W, O'Reilly M. Investigation of avian influenza (H5N1) outbreak in humans -- Thailand, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006;55:Suppl 1:3-6
    Medline

  2. 2

    Pham DN, Hoang LT, Nguyen TKT, et al. Risk factors for human infection with avian influenza A H5N1, Vietnam, 2004. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:1841-1847
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    de Jong MD, Simmons CP, Thanh TT, et al. Fatal outcome of human influenza A (H5N1) is associated with high viral load and hypercytokinemia. Nat Med 2006;12:1203-1207
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    World Health Organization. Collecting, preserving and shipping specimens for the diagnosis of avian influenza A(H5N1) virus infection. Guide for field operations. 2006 (Accessed March 8, 2007, at http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/surveillance/WHO_CDS_EPR_ARO_2006_1/en/index.html.)

  5. 5

    Shinya K, Ebina M, Yamada S, Ono M, Kasai N, Kawaoka Y. Avian flu: influenza virus receptors in the human airway. Nature 2006;440:435-436
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Author/Editor Response

Dudley raises important unresolved issues about the timely detection and reporting of serologically confirmed cases of H5N1 infection in humans in South Korea and Japan between December 2003 and March 2004. Because of limited space, our Perspective article did not address the retrospective human cases of H5N1 in South Korea and Japan. The surprising finding is the low incidence of infection among humans after contact with infected poultry. The reemergence of H5N1 in poultry in both Vietnam and South Korea indicates that H5N1 virus continues to emerge and that the focus for eventual control may be domestic waterfowl.

Robert G. Webster, Ph.D.
Elena A. Govorkova, M.D., Ph.D.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105

Citing Articles (3)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Toru Watanabe, Timothy A. Bartrand, Mark H. Weir, Tatsuo Omura, Charles N. Haas. (2010) Development of a Dose-Response Model for SARS Coronavirus. Risk Analysis 30:7, 1129-1138
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    John M. NICHOLLS, J.S. Malik PEIRIS. (2008) Avian influenza: Update on pathogenesis and laboratory diagnosis. Respirology 13:s1, S14-S18
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Susan Shoshana Weisberg. (2007) Influenza. Disease-a-Month 53:9, 435-446
    CrossRef

Trends: Most Viewed (Last Week)

More Trends