Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Correspondence

Statins and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer

N Engl J Med 2005; 353:952-954September 1, 2005

Article

To the Editor:

Poynter et al. (May 26 issue)1 reported a 47 percent reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer among long-term statin users (i.e., five years or more), as compared with short-term users or nonstatin users. In contrast, a randomized trial2 and meta-analyses3 have found either a slight increase in cancer among statin users or no relation between statins and cancers. Although trials are often limited to comparatively young, low-risk patients and have short follow-up, this difference may result from methodologic limitations in the observational study by Poynter et al.

Long-term statin users tend to be healthier, less physically and cognitively frail, and more adherent to therapy and screening than nonusers.4-6 In persons who use statins preventively, it may be more likely that precancerous colorectal polyps will be detected and removed early, further making statins appear to be protective. The current study failed to adjust for these factors, which probably led to residual confounding. Therefore, the lower risk of cancer among long-term statin users may say more about the kind of patients who seek these drugs and comply with statin therapy than about any protective effect. This may be similar to the “cardioprotective” effect once reported for long-term estrogen use.

Soko Setoguchi, M.D., M.P.H.
Jerry Avorn, M.D.
Sebastian Schneeweiss, M.D.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120

6 References
  1. 1

    Poynter JN, Gruber SB, Higgins PDR, et al. Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2184-2192
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB, et al. Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:1623-1630
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Bjerre LM, LeLorier J. Do statins cause cancer? A meta-analysis of large randomized clinical trials. Am J Med 2001;110:716-723
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Glynn RJ, Knight EL, Levin R, Avorn J. Paradoxical relations of drug treatment with mortality in older persons. Epidemiology 2001;12:682-689
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Benner JS, Glynn RJ, Mogun H, Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC, Avorn J. Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patients. JAMA 2002;288:455-461
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Redelmeier DA, Tan SH, Booth GL. The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1516-1520
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

To the Editor:

Poynter and colleagues conducted a large case–control study to assess the effect of statin use for at least five years on the risk of colorectal cancer. In this study, in contrast to other recent reports,1-3 statin use was strongly protective. Although the authors adjusted their results for several known risk factors, there are potentially confounding factors that were not considered. Statins are cholesterol-lowering drugs used for the prevention of heart disease and stroke. For obvious reasons, persons taking a chemotherapeutic, preventive agent over a long period of time would have followed other general health recommendations. For example, it is likely that statin users were advised to consume a healthy diet, to increase physical activity, and to stop smoking (smoking is a recognized risk factor for colorectal cancer that was not considered in the study). Also, screening for colorectal cancer may have been more frequent in the statin group, and this factor alone could be responsible for the low rate of colorectal cancer observed in statin users. As pointed out in the accompanying editorial, only placebo-controlled trials will clarify the statin–cancer question.4

Patrick Maisonneuve, Eng.
European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milan, Italy

Albert B. Lowenfels, M.D.
New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595

4 References
  1. 1

    Graaf MR, Beiderbeck AB, Egberts AC, Richel DJ, Guchelaar HJ. The risk of cancer in users of statins. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2388-2394
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Kaye JA, Jick H. Statin use and cancer risk in the General Practice Research Database. Br J Cancer 2004;90:635-637
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Friis S, Poulsen AH, Johnsen SP, et al. Cancer risk among statin users: a population-based cohort study. Int J Cancer 2005;114:643-647
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Hawk E, Viner JL. Statins and cancer -- beyond the “one drug, one disease“ model. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2238-2239
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

To the Editor:

Our recent journal club applauded the efforts of Poynter and colleagues to confirm the validity of self-reported statin exposure with the use of pharmacy records. However, as shown in Table 1Table 1Self-Reported vs. Documented Statin Use., the data raise more questions than they answer.

Although self-reported statin use for five or more years was nearly twice as likely among controls as among patients with cancer, the documented use of a statin within the previous year was nearly equivalent between the two groups. If the self-reported data are accurate, this raises the question of why there was such a dramatic drop in statin use among the controls (particularly in an era when we all seem to be using these agents more, rather than less, often). In this scenario, it would seem that the controls are highly unusual — and not a valid comparison group. If, on the other hand, the self-reported data are inaccurate, and the pharmacy data more closely reflect the true frequency of exposure, then little association between statin use and colorectal cancer exists.

H. Gilbert Welch, M.D., M.P.H.
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT 05009

Author/Editor Response

One limitation of observational epidemiology is the possibility that differences between patients and controls might lead to inappropriate interpretations if these differences are incompletely accounted for within the design or analysis of the study. Setoguchi et al. suggest that statin users in our study might be healthier and more prevention-oriented than nonusers. Our data do confirm that long-term statin users are more likely to participate in screening than are nonusers: 58 percent of controls who used statins for five or more years reported having had a fecal occult-blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy, as compared with 43 percent of controls who were nonusers. However, this difference had no impact on our results. We analyzed our data again, after adjustment for screening, and found no change in the odds ratio for colorectal cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 0.53; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.70). Similarly, Maisonneuve and Lowenfels suggest that diet, physical activity, smoking, and screening for colorectal cancer were not fully considered in the data presented in our article, even though our analysis was adjusted for diet and physical activity. In our data, smoking status was not associated with the risk of colorectal cancer. We estimated the relative risk associated with statins after simultaneously adjusting for smoking, screening, and vitamin supplementation (as another potential measure of “healthy,” prevention-oriented behavior) in addition to the variables we previously described. The adjusted odds ratio for colorectal cancer associated with statin use was 0.54 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.72).

Welch notes that the use of a statin within the previous year, as documented in pharmacy records, was nearly equivalent between patients and controls. Pharmacy records were not sufficiently detailed to provide a lifetime summary of medication use for our participants, since such records were derived from a single health provider over one year. Analyses of any statin use recorded in the pharmacy database between 1998 and 2004 are consistent with an inverse association, with any statin use identified in 17.8 percent of patients and 27.7 percent of controls (odds ratio, 0.59; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 0.73). However, the limitations of electronic pharmacy records, the ability for persons to switch health plans, and the documented validity of self-reporting led us to conclude that self-reported use of medication was the best measure of exposure in our study.

Despite the consistency of our findings, observational studies are not equivalent to randomized clinical trials, and thus we agree with the conclusion of Maisonneuve and Lowenfels that placebo-controlled trials are required to clarify further the potential relationship between statins and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Jenny N. Poynter, Ph.D.
Stephen B. Gruber, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0638

Gad Rennert, M.D., Ph.D.
Clalit Health Services National Cancer Control Center, 34362 Haifa, Israel

Citing Articles (6)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Sara Lodi, Stephen J. W. Evans, Peter Egger, James Carpenter. (2010) Is there an anti-inflammatory effect of statins in rheumatoid arthritis? Analysis of a large routinely collected claims database. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 69:1, 85-94
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Dennis J Ahnen, Tim Byers. (2009) Editorial: Colorectal Cancer and Statins: Reflections From the End of the Road. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 104:12, 3024-3026
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    E. Dawn Flick, Laurel A. Habel, K. Arnold Chan, Reina Haque, Virginia P. Quinn, Stephen K. Van Den Eeden, Barbara Sternfeld, Endel J. Orav, John D. Seeger, Charles P. Quesenberry, Bette J. Caan. (2009) Statin Use and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in a Cohort of Middle-Aged Men in the US. Drugs 69:11, 1445-1457
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Hyun Jeung Choi, Tae Yong Kim, Eui Young Kim, Won Gu Kim, Won Bae Kim, Young Kee Shong. (2008) Effects of Simvastatin on the Growth and Invasion of Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Cells Lines. Journal of Korean Endocrine Society 23:4, 238
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Gary D. Friedman, E. Dawn Flick, Natalia Udaltsova, James Chan Pharm D, Charles P. Quesenberry, Laurel A. Habel. (2008) Screening statins for possible carcinogenic risk: up to 9 years of follow-up of 361 859 recipients. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 17:1, 27-36
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Michael Hoffmeister, Jenny Chang-Claude, Hermann Brenner. (2007) Individual and joint use of statins and low-dose aspirin and risk of colorectal cancer: A population-based case–control study. International Journal of Cancer 121:6, 1325-1330
    CrossRef

Trends: Most Viewed (Last Week)

More Trends