Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Correspondence

Palifermin and Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis

N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1264-1265March 24, 2005

Article

To the Editor:

In the editorial by Garfunkel (Dec. 16 issue),1 which accompanies the report by Spielberger et al.2 about the action of palifermin in oral mucositis, Garfunkel cites other approaches but does not mention that low-level laser therapy might be useful in decreasing the severity of chemotherapy-associated oral mucositis.3 We believe that low-level laser therapy should be included in a randomized trial of palifermin in patients with oral mucositis.

Ahmad Awada, M.D., Ph.D.
Marie-Thérèse Genot, M.D.
Jean Klastersky, M.D., Ph.D.
Jules Bordet Institute, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium

3 References
  1. 1

    Garfunkel AA. Oral mucositis -- the search for a solution. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2649-2651
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Spielberger R, Stiff P, Bensinger W, et al. Palifermin for oral mucositis after intensive therapy for hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2590-2598
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Genot M-T, Klastersky J. Low level laser for prevention and therapy of oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Curr Opin Oncol (in press).

To the Editor:

The study by Spielberger et al. of palifermin is a hallmark trial for the prevention of severe oral mucositis due to myeloablative treatment. Stratification was performed according to the type of hematologic cancer and the treatment center, respectively, and treatment groups were compared by means of the generalized Cochrane–Mantel–Haenszel method stratified according to the study center. However, there are risk factors that may influence both the incidence and the severity of oral mucositis.1 These factors include smoking, malnutrition, poor oral hygiene, xerostomia, and other underlying oral disorders — none of which have been reported. Because these factors may have an important role in the development of mucositis and its subsequent course, the analysis of the outcome should have been adjusted for them.

Wolfgang J. Köstler, M.D.
Michael Hejna, M.D.
Christoph C. Zielinski, M.D.
Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria

1 References
  1. 1

    Kostler WJ, Hejna M, Wenzel C, Zielinski CC. Oral mucositis complicating chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy: options for prevention and treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:290-315
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

To the Editor:

A number of questions remain regarding the safe use of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor to decrease oral mucosal damage after total-body irradiation and high-dose chemotherapy in patients with hematologic cancers. Spielberger et al. simply list the overall incidence of adverse events, without grading their severity using the World Health Organization (WHO) toxicity scale or Common Toxicity Criteria.1 Meropol and coworkers previously observed severe dose-limiting cutaneous toxic effects that were associated with recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor.2 Given that recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor is being used as supportive care to ameliorate the adverse effects of cytotoxic drugs and radiation therapy, we believe it is vital to demonstrate that this agent itself does not cause unacceptable toxic effects. In addition, there is concern that recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor may stimulate the proliferation of tumor cells.3 The safety of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor must be properly evaluated in ongoing clinical trials4 before it can be accepted into routine clinical practice.

Carlo Palmieri, M.B., B.S., Ph.D.
David Vigushin, M.B., B.Ch., Ph.D.
Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom

4 References
  1. 1

    Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol 2003;13:176-181
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Meropol NJ, Somer RA, Gutheil J, et al. Randomized phase I trial of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor plus chemotherapy: potential role as mucosal protectant. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1452-1458
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Powers CJ, McLeskey SW, Wellstein A. Fibroblast growth factors, their receptors and signaling. Endocr Relat Cancer 2000;7:165-197
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Clarke SJ, Abdi A, Davies ID, et al. Recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor (rHuKGF) prevents chemotherapy-induced mucositis in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2001;20:383a-383a abstract.

Author/Editor Response

Drs. Palmieri and Vigushin refer to the study by Meropol et al.,1 which was a phase 1 trial of a fluorouracil-based regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer.1 In that study, one patient of eight treated with palifermin at a dose of 60 μg per kilogram of body weight (the dose used in our study) had grade 3 skin toxic effects that required discontinuation of the drug. In our study, adverse events were mild to moderate (equivalent to WHO Common Toxicity Criteria grade 1 or 2), transient, and not a cause for discontinuation of the study drug. We found that there were no secondary cancers related to keratinocyte growth factor and that the rates of progression-free survival at approximately one year of follow-up were identical in the two groups.

In regard to the comments by Köstler and colleagues, our study was randomized, and patients were balanced between the study groups with regard to baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary analysis was prospectively defined and presented in our article. Additional analyses were not included because of space constraints and because the primary analysis showed unequivocal efficacy. Analysis of covariates indicated that patients received a benefit from palifermin in all subgroups analyzed. Although data on oral hygiene, presence or absence of underlying oral disorders, and smoking status were not collected, we examined the remaining potential prognostic factors associated with the incidence and severity of oral mucositis. The incidence of severe oral mucositis (WHO grade ≥3) was lower among patients who received palifermin, regardless of whether the patient had undergone radiotherapy. This difference was also seen regardless of baseline performance status, age, and weight. The management of oral hygiene and oral disease before the start of the treatment protocol was specific to the standard of care in each study center, and the results of primary analyses were similar across centers. In addition, the use of antiviral drugs was well balanced between the study groups.

We agree with Awada and colleagues that low-level laser therapy has not been fully evaluated,2 and we would welcome continued exploration of its use and mechanism of action. Investigators who support further development of low-level laser therapy might find it helpful to compare this approach with the standard of care, palifermin, or both in a randomized trial.

Ricardo Spielberger, M.D.
City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010

Patrick Stiff, M.D.
Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153

William Bensinger, M.D.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109

2 References
  1. 1

    Meropol NJ, Somer RA, Gutheil J, et al. Randomized phase I trial of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor plus chemotherapy: potential role as mucosal protectant. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:1452-1458
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Rubenstein EB, Peterson DE, Schubert M, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of cancer therapy-induced oral and gastrointestinal mucositis. Cancer 2004;100:Suppl 9:2026-2046
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (7)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    P.A.G. Carvalho, G.C. Jaguar, A.C. Pellizzon, J.D. Prado, R.N. Lopes, F.A. Alves. (2011) Evaluation of low-level laser therapy in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced mucositis: A double-blind randomized study in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncology
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Jan E Clarkson, Helen V Worthington, Susan Furness, Martin McCabe, Tasneem Khalid, Stefan Meyer, Helen V Worthington. 2010. Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment. .
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Takayoshi Maiguma, Hiroaki Kaji, Kazutaka Makino, Daisuke Teshima. (2009) Protective Effects of Amifostine and Cyclooxygenase-1 Inhibitor against Normal Human Epidermal Keratinocyte Toxicity Induced by Methotrexate and 5-Fluorouracil. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology 105:1, 1-9
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Roger Yazbeck, Gordon S. Howarth, Catherine A. Abbott. (2009) Growth factor based therapies and intestinal disease: Is glucagon-like peptide-2 the new way forward?. Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 20:2, 175-184
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    GC Jaguar, JD Prado, IN Nishimoto, MC Pinheiro, DO de Castro, DE da Cruz Perez, FA Alves. (2007) Low-energy laser therapy for prevention of oral mucositis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Oral Diseases 13:6, 538-543
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Jan E Clarkson, Helen V Worthington, Tim OB Eden, Helen V Worthington. 2007. Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment. .
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    C Scully, S Sonis, PD Diz. (2006) Oral mucositis. Oral Diseases 12:3, 229-241
    CrossRef