Correspondence
Was Rembrandt Stereoblind?
N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1264-1265September 16, 2004
- Article
To the Editor:
Stereopsis is an important cue for depth perception, yet it can be a hindrance to an artist trying to depict a three-dimensional scene on a flat surface. Art teachers often instruct students to close one eye in order to flatten what they see. Therefore, stereoblindness might not be a handicap — and might even be an asset — for some artists. Stereopsis requires precise alignment of the two eyes. We examined a number of self-portraits of Rembrandt, an artist known for his astute powers of observation, and noticed that many of them show his eyes as exotropic, some to a degree that would be incompatible with normal stereopsis. We wondered whether the gaze angle of the eyes in Rembrandt's self-portraits was random or whether the gaze deviation was systematic, as it would be if he were accurately portraying a feature of his physiognomy.
We examined high-resolution images of the oil paintings and etchings listed in a comprehensive catalogue of self-portraits spanning Rembrandt's career.1 Most show one eye gazing directly at the viewer and the other eye deviating laterally (Figure 1Figure 1
Self-Portrait Leaning on a Stone Wall (Detail).). We quantified this pattern in all the Rembrandt self-portraits in which both eyes can be seen well enough to estimate the position of the pupil (or the center of the iris) within the opening between the eyelids (24 oil paintings and 12 etchings). For each portrait, we aligned an ellipse with the eye contour, then aligned a circle with the circumference of the iris, and then measured the horizontal position of the circle along the eye contour. We found that Rembrandt portrayed his eyes as exotropic in 35 of the 36 self-portraits. In 23 of the 24 paintings, the eye on the right side of the painting tends to look straight ahead and the other eye deviates outward, whereas in all 12 etchings, this asymmetry is reversed (Figure 2Figure 2
Position of the Iris within the Eye.).Because an etching is made by scratching lines on a metal plate that is used to make a print, what you see in the print is reversed, left to right, from what the artist drew on the plate. The fact that the eye that deviates outward in the etchings is the opposite eye from the one that deviates outward in most of the paintings suggests that Rembrandt actually did have a unilateral strabismus — otherwise, the deviating eye would be random. One oil self-portrait2 shows an asymmetry in the eyes that contradicts the pattern, so we wonder whether Rembrandt painted it from an etching, or whether it was painted by a student looking directly at Rembrandt, and not at a mirror image.
2 ReferencesMargaret S. Livingstone, Ph.D.
Bevil R. Conway, Ph.D.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115- Citing Articles (6)
Citing Articles
1
Daniel J. Graham, Christoph Redies. (2010) Statistical regularities in art: Relations with visual coding and perception. Vision Research 50:16, 1503-1509
CrossRef2
Bevil R Conway, Margaret S Livingstone. (2007) Perspectives on science and art. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 17:4, 476-482
CrossRef3
A. Cuschieri. (2006) Epistemology of visual imaging in endoscopic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 20:S2, S419-S424
CrossRef4
J.A. Stockman. (2006) Outcome of Eyes With Unilateral Sporadic Retinoblastoma Based on the Initial External Findings by the Family and the Pediatrician. Yearbook of Pediatrics 2006, 481-484
CrossRef5
Virginia Trimble, Markus Aschwanden. (2005) Astrophysics in 2004. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 117:830, 311-394
CrossRef6
(2005) Was Rembrandt Stereoblind?. New England Journal of Medicine 352:6, 631-632
Full Text
- Letters







