Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Correspondence

Correction

Diffuse Cerebral Infarction after Cardiac Arrest

N Engl J Med 2003; 348:2689June 26, 2003

Article

To the Editor:

In the Images in Clinical Medicine entitled “Fatal Cerebral Hypoxemia after Cardiac Arrest” (Feb. 27 issue),1 the term “hypoxemia” is misused.2 How can hypoxemia be cerebral, when the term refers to oxygen levels in the blood? More important, hypoxemia is a distinct insult from ischemia,3,4 and controlled experiments in animal models have shown that pure hypoxemia without heart stoppage does not cause brain necrosis.5,6 A better title for the image would have been “Widespread Brain Necrosis after Cardiac Arrest.” This title would not have perpetuated the myth that hypoxemia by itself causes necrotizing brain damage.

Roland N. Auer, M.D., Ph.D.
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada

6 References
  1. 1

    Kelsen J, Obel A. Fatal cerebral hypoxemia after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2003;348:817-817
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Auer RN, Sutherland GR. Hypoxia and related conditions. In: Graham DI, Lantos PL, eds. Greenfield's neuropathology. 7th ed. Vol. 1. London: Edward Arnold, 2002:233-80.

  3. 3

    Auer RN, Siesjo BK. Biological differences between ischemia, hypoglycemia, and epilepsy. Ann Neurol 1988;24:699-707
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Simon RP. Hypoxia versus ischemia. Neurology 1999;52:7-8
    Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Pearigen P, Gwinn R, Simon RP. The effects of in vivo hypoxia on brain injury. Brain Res 1996;725:184-191
    Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Miyamoto O, Auer RN. Hypoxia, hyperoxia, ischemia, and brain necrosis. Neurology 2000;54:362-371
    Web of Science | Medline

Author/Editor Response

I thank Dr. Auer for his interest in the images and his comment on the inappropriate use of the term “hypoxemia” in the title. On the basis of research by Dr. Auer and others, a clear distinction has been established between the terms “hypoxia” and “ischemia” and between their respective roles in cerebral infarction.1,2 I understand that the title could lead to the misinterpretation that hypoxemia caused the reported brain damage. This patient obviously had primary cerebral ischemia — as opposed to primary cerebral hypoxia — due to cardiac and circulatory arrest. The proposed title by Dr. Auer refers to a morphologic description of the cerebral injury. However, the dramatic changes seen on three consecutive computed tomographic (CT) scans represented developing edema and infarction but did not reflect widespread brain necrosis. Panel A of our image shows a CT scan obtained one hour after presentation, and Panel B shows a scan obtained four hours later — not eight hours later, as stated in the legend. The scan obtained at eight hours is shown in Figure 1Figure 1Computed Tomographic Scan of the Brain, Obtained Eight Hours after Cardiac Arrest, Showing Severe Edema and Infarction in the Anterior and Posterior Circulation of Both Hemispheres.. An alternative title that summarizes the underlying pathophysiological features of the case could be “Evolving Diffuse Cerebral Infarction after Cardiac Arrest.”

Jesper Kelsen, M.D.
University Hospital of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

2 References
  1. 1

    Miyamoto O, Auer RN. Hypoxia, hyperoxia, ischemia, and brain necrosis. Neurology 2000;54:362-371
    Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Simon RP. Hypoxia versus ischemia. Neurology 1999;52:7-8
    Web of Science | Medline