Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

The Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Turkey

Kemal Tahaoğlu, M.D., Tülay Törün, M.D., Tülin Sevim, M.D., Güliz Ataç, M.D., Altan Kir, M.D., Levent Karasulu, M.D., İpek Özmen, M.D., and Nilüfer Kapaklı, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2001; 345:170-174July 19, 2001

Abstract

Background

We evaluated the results of treatment in 158 consecutive patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis who were treated at our center in Istanbul, Turkey.

Methods

A total of 21 female patients and 137 male patients (age range, 15 to 68 years) received treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis between March 1992 and October 1999. The patients had previously received a mean of 5.7 antituberculosis drugs and were infected with organisms that were resistant to a mean of 4.4 drugs. All patients received at least three drugs thought to be active; the treatment was continued for at least 18 months after the conversion to a negative culture and for at least 24 months in the absence of first-line drugs.

Results

The mean number of drugs given during the study was 5.5 (range, 3 to 9). Surgical resection was performed in 36 patients. Adverse effects led to discontinuation of one or more drugs in 62 patients (39 percent). Cultures became negative in 150 patients (95 percent) after a mean of 1.9 months (range, 1 to 9). The overall success rate of treatment was 77 percent, with cures in 78 patients (49 percent) and probable cures in 43 (27 percent). Treatment failed in 13 patients (8 percent). Seven patients died (4 percent). Seventeen patients (11 percent) did not complete the treatment regimen. Thirty-eight percent of the patients with unsuccessful outcomes were infected with organisms that were resistant to more than five drugs. In a step-down logistic-regression analysis, a successful outcome was independently associated with a younger age (P=0.013) and the absence of previous treatment with ofloxacin (P=0.005).

Conclusions

Most patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis can be cured with the use of appropriate, intensive treatment regimens.

Media in This Article

Table 1Drugs and Doses Used in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.
Table 2Definitions of Outcomes.
Article

Drug resistance has become a major problem in the treatment of tuberculosis.1 Resistance rates in Turkey are high because treatment approaches are often inappropriate, rates of treatment completion are low, and therapy is not directly observed. Despite a relatively stable number of new cases of tuberculosis each year, resistance to rifampin is growing, as is multidrug resistance.2 We report our experience in treating patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Methods

We conducted our study at the Sureyyapaşa Center for Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery, a referral center in Istanbul, Turkey, for workers and family members who receive state social and health services. The center has a comprehensive tuberculosis unit that was established eight years ago to supervise the treatment and follow-up of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The unit offers long-term hospitalization (a stay of at least six months), with all needed drug therapy. After discharge, patients may be excused from work for long periods. All expenses during treatment (hospitalization, drugs, and surgery) are covered by the state organization; patients do not incur any expenses. Our tuberculosis unit has unlimited access to all services within the hospital, including the bacteriology, radiology, pathology, and biochemistry laboratories; lung-function testing and bronchoscopy; and the department of thoracic surgery, where resectional surgery is performed. Consultation with specialists is always available as needed.

Our study included 158 consecutive patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis who were negative for the human immunodeficiency virus and who received treatment between March 1992 and October 1999. There were 21 female and 137 male patients (age range, 15 to 68 years). Our retrospective evaluation included data on clinical, radiologic, and bacteriologic variables; the outcome of treatment; adverse drug effects; and the association between selected variables and the outcome.

Diagnosis

On admission, the infection was classified as new or old on the basis of the medical history. Initially, in vitro susceptibility tests were performed for all patients with the use of Lowenstein–Jensen medium and the method of proportions. Susceptibility was determined on the basis of the following drugs and concentrations, with appropriate controls: isoniazid (paired samples), 0.5 and 1 μg per milliliter; rifampin (paired samples), 20 and 40 μg per milliliter; ethambutol, 2 μg per milliliter; and streptomycin (paired samples), 5 and 10 μg per milliliter. Resistance was defined as the growth of more than 1 percent as many colonies on drug-containing medium as on drug-free medium.

New cases of tuberculosis were treated according to the guidelines of the National Tuberculosis Control Programme — namely, with the use of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, or streptomycin during the initial phase and with the use of isoniazid plus rifampin during the continuation phase. Patients remained hospitalized until smears were negative. Because of the delay in obtaining the results of susceptibility tests (a period of two to three months), we continued the treatment protocol in patients with new infections unless there was a positive smear in the fifth month after the start of treatment. Such a smear was considered to indicate treatment failure due to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, and further treatment was individualized for all patients who met this criterion.

For patients with previous infections, medical records were reviewed. Documentation of treatment failure with protocols containing isoniazid plus rifampin was regarded as evidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

The disease was classified as extensive or limited on the basis of the radiologic findings. Extensive involvement was defined as the presence of cavities totaling at least 15 cm in diameter or moderately dense infiltrates involving at least 75 percent of the lung fields, or both.3

Treatment

Drugs were classified according to their activity. Active drugs were those that had not been given previously or that had been administered for less than one month. All second-line drugs that had not been used previously were considered to be active. Drugs with uncertain activity were those that had been used previously but that were shown to be active on susceptibility testing. Drugs associated with treatment failure and those to which there was resistance on susceptibility testing were regarded as ineffective.

Regimens comprised at least three active first- or second-line drugs (or a combination of first- and second-line drugs), which were chosen, whenever possible, from the list of previously unused drugs. An appropriate aminoglycoside was always included if possible, in the following order of preference: amikacin (given to 120 patients), kanamycin (15), or streptomycin (8), depending on their cost and availability, and the pattern of resistance. For the 15 patients in whom none of these drugs were appropriate, capreomycin was selected. The preferred oral drugs were pyrazinamide (given to 50 patients), ethambutol (36), ofloxacin (126), protionamide (127), cycloserine (142), and aminosalicylic acid (124) (Table 1Table 1Drugs and Doses Used in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.).

Drugs with uncertain activity were always included in the treatment regimen. When the number of previously unused first- and second-line drugs was less than three, the following drugs with unproved activity were added to the regimen: rifabutin (in 15 patients), clarithromycin (27), clofazimine (11), and amoxicillin–clavulanate (44).

Treatment was continued for at least 18 months after the first negative culture had been obtained and for at least 24 months in the absence of first-line drugs. All patients were hospitalized at least for the duration of parenteral therapy.

The administration of all drugs was initiated at the same time and at full doses with dose intervals adjusted according to the patients' tolerance. Drugs that had life-threatening side effects (nephrotoxic or hepatotoxic effects) or that caused uncontrollable psychosis, visual disturbances, major ototoxicity or neurologic toxicity, or uncontrollable gastrointestinal disturbances were excluded. Patients in whom toxic effects were not documented received parenteral therapy five days a week for at least six months after a negative culture had been obtained.

Surgical resection was considered after two months of treatment for all patients who met the criteria recommended by Iseman et al.4: drug resistance with a high probability of failure or relapse, sufficiently localized disease, and the availability of drugs with adequate efficacy to cause rapid healing of the bronchial stump. Preoperative evaluation included computed tomographic scanning of the chest, lung-function tests, quantitative perfusion scintigraphy, and fiberoptic bronchoscopic biopsy.

Follow-up evaluations included a sputum smear, culture, and chest radiograph obtained every month during treatment, every other month during the first six-month period after the completion of therapy, and once during the subsequent six-month period.

A treatment response, a successful outcome (cure or probable cure), and a poor outcome were defined according to the recommendations of the World Health Organization (Table 2Table 2Definitions of Outcomes.).5 We analyzed the relation between the outcome of treatment and variables that might influence the outcome. Differences with regard to numerical values between the group of patients with successful outcomes and the group with poor outcomes were analyzed with the use of Student's t-test for variables with normal distributions and the Mann–Whitney U test for those without normal distributions. Nominal variables were assessed by the chi-square test. A step-down logistic-regression model was used to determine independent predictive factors for a successful outcome. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

The mean duration of disease before hospitalization was 80 months (range, 5 to 416). The mean number of drugs used previously was 5.7 (range, 3 to 10). Thirty-four patients (22 percent) had new infections and 124 (78 percent) had old infections. The mean number of drugs to which resistance was shown was 4.4 (range, 2 to 9). A total of 152 patients (96 percent) had at least one pulmonary cavity. The disease was extensive in 63 patients (40 percent) and was limited in 95 (60 percent). Concomitant diseases included diabetes alone (in 23 patients), asthma (in 1), ischemic heart disease and diabetes (in 1), familial Mediterranean fever (in 1), and psoriasis (in 1).

There were 69 individualized treatment protocols. The three most common combinations of drugs were amikacin, ofloxacin, cycloserine, protionamide, and aminosalicylic acid, a regimen given to 42 patients (27 percent); amikacin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide, ofloxacin, protionamide, and cycloserine, a regimen given to 9 patients (6 percent); and amikacin, ofloxacin, protionamide, cycloserine, pyrazinamide, and aminosalicylic acid, a regimen also given to 9 patients (6 percent).

The mean length of hospitalization was 200 days (range, 60 to 450). During hospitalization, a mean of 5.5 drugs (range, 3 to 9) were administered, including a mean of 4.4 active drugs (range, 1 to 8). All patients received an aminoglycoside for a mean period of 6 months (range, 1 to 11). The mean follow-up period after the completion of treatment was 27 months (range, 6 to 85). Adverse effects resulted in the withdrawal of one or more drugs in 62 patients (39 percent). In two patients with drug-induced hepatitis, treatment was discontinued until the hepatitis had been controlled (Table 3Table 3Adverse Effects of Drugs.).

In addition to chemotherapy, 36 patients (23 percent) underwent surgical resection, after 3 to 10 months of treatment (mean, 5.9). All but two of the patients had negative smears and cultures at the time of surgery. Cultures became negative in 150 patients (95 percent) after a mean of 1.9 months of treatment (range, 1 to 9). Treatment was successful in 121 patients (77 percent); 78 patients (49 percent) were classified as cured, and 43 (27 percent) had probable cures. The outcome was successful in 89 of the 122 patients treated without surgery (73 percent). Seventeen patients (11 percent) did not complete the treatment regimen. Treatment failed in 13 patients (8 percent). Seven patients died (4 percent). Of the 78 patients who were considered to be cured, 18 were subsequently lost to follow-up. For the other 60 patients, the duration of follow-up ranged from 20 to 85 months (mean, 39). Relapse was observed in 1 of the 78 patients 24 months after the completion of therapy, including surgery.

Of the 36 patients who underwent surgery, 21 (58 percent) had cures and 11 (31 percent) had probable cures, for an overall success rate of 89 percent. Two patients died, one did not have a response to treatment, and one did not complete the regimen.

There were no statistically significant differences between the group of patients with successful outcomes and the group with unsuccessful outcomes, with regard to sex, the number of drugs to which organisms were resistant or susceptible, the extent and duration of disease, or the number of drugs used in the study protocol. However, patients with unsuccessful outcomes had a higher mean age (42±11 vs. 36±12 years, P=0.008), a larger median number of drugs used previously (six vs. five, P=0.048), a higher incidence of antecedent ofloxacin use (57 percent vs. 30 percent, P=0.004), and a lower frequency of ofloxacin use in the study protocol (65 percent vs. 84 percent, P=0.018). The percentage of patients with organisms that were resistant to more than five drugs (in an analysis in which the number of drugs was classified as two or three, four or five, or six to nine) was significantly higher in the group with unsuccessful outcomes (38 percent vs. 12 percent, P=0.001). Step-down logistic regression showed that age and previous use or nonuse of ofloxacin had significant independent effects on the outcome of treatment (P=0.013 and P=0.005, respectively) (Table 4Table 4Characteristics of Patients, Treatment Regimens, and Disease in Relation to the Outcome.).

Discussion

There have been many large, well-documented case-series analyses of the treatment of tuberculosis.6 Despite many recommendations, however, no treatment regimens have proven efficacy against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Moreover, treatment usually involves potentially toxic drugs.7 There is controversy over whether to consider multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatable or untreatable, given the often limited resources available.8-10

Our study shows that multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is treatable and that a similar strategy for managing new and old infections is effective. In our case series, there was a bacteriologic response rate of 95 percent. The rates of cure, probable cure, and overall success were 49, 27, and 77 percent, respectively. With medical therapy alone, a successful outcome was achieved in 73 percent of cases.

In an early study of the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, Goble et al. reported an overall response rate of 56 percent.3 The response rates have been higher in more recent studies. In a study of patients in New York, the rate of successful treatment was 96 percent,11 and a report from Korea cited a bacteriologic response rate of 83 percent12; in the latter study, a successful outcome was mainly associated with the use of quinolones.

Despite these encouraging results, the emergence and rapid growth of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis are still a matter of great concern. Our data also demonstrate how programs for the control of tuberculosis and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis should not be implemented. We often see patients in whom drug resistance has developed because of inappropriately or poorly implemented primary programs of tuberculosis control. For example, in Turkey case finding is mainly passive and follow-up is inconsistent; thus, estimates of the overall prevalence or cure rate throughout the country cannot be made. The problem is further complicated by the unrestricted sales of all first-line antituberculosis drugs. Rifampin, for example, has been sold since the 1970s without any restrictions, and in recent years, second-line antituberculosis drugs have also become available without restrictions. Failure to control the use of these drugs will inevitably make multidrug-resistant tuberculosis even more common.

When a treatment fails despite hospitalization and the use of a regimen that includes isoniazid and rifampin, we individualize the therapy. In our series, we did not perform susceptibility tests for second-line drugs because the probability of primary resistance is relatively low as a result of the recent introduction of these drugs and because acquired resistance to these drugs can be suspected from the medical history.

The inclusion of ofloxacin in the study protocols and its absence in previous regimens were associated with a successful outcome. Moreover, ofloxacin was well tolerated, and no severe adverse events were associated with its use. In fact, among the second-line drugs, ofloxacin was the only one that did not have to be withdrawn in one or more cases because of adverse events.

In a step-down, logistic-regression analysis, older age and the inclusion of ofloxacin in previous regimens were significantly associated with a poor outcome. In addition, there was a significant relation between resistance to more than five drugs and an unsuccessful outcome.

In our study, 89 percent of the patients who underwent surgery had successful outcomes. However, the role of surgical resection in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis requires validation by comparative studies.

In conclusion, our data indicate that multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is a curable disease, provided that an appropriate approach to control is implemented and that appropriate treatment protocols are used.

We are indebted to Professor Oktay İmecik for scientific advice, to Dr. Hadi Sağın for statistical analyses, and to the members of Ekin for editorial assistance.

Source Information

From the Departments of Pulmonary Disease (K.T., T.T., T.S., G.A., I.O., N.K.) and Thoracic Surgery (A.K.), Sureyyapaşa Center for Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery; and the Department of Chest Diseases, Istanbul Medicine Faculty, Istanbul University (L.K.) — both in Istanbul, Turkey.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Tahaoğlu at Ekin Tıbbi Yayıncılık, Osmanağa Mah. Nüzhet Efendi Sok. No. 49/3, 81320 Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    Rieder HL. Drug-resistant tuberculosis: issues in epidemiology and challenges for public health. Tuber Lung Dis 1994;75:321-323
    CrossRef | Medline

  2. 2

    Tahaoglu K, Kizkin O, Karagoz T, Tor M, Partal M, Sadoglu T. High initial and acquired drug resistance in pulmonary tuberculosis in Turkey. Tuber Lung Dis 1994;75:324-328
    CrossRef | Medline

  3. 3

    Goble M, Iseman MD, Madsen LA, Waite D, Ackerson L, Horsburgh CR Jr. Treatment of 171 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid and rifampin. N Engl J Med 1993;328:527-532
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Iseman MD, Madsen L, Goble M, Pomerantz M. Surgical intervention in the treatment of pulmonary disease caused by drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:623-625
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Farmer P, Kim JY, Mitnick CD, Becerra M. Protocol for the implementation of individualized treatment regimens for multidrug resistant tuberculosis in resource-poor settings. In: Espinal MA, ed. Multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB): basis for the development of an evidence-based case-management strategy for MDR TB within the WHO's DOTS strategy. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1999:Part V. (Report no. WHO/TB/99.260.)

  6. 6

    Iseman MD, Sbarbaro JA. Short-course chemotherapy of tuberculosis: hail Britannia (and friends)! Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;143:697-698
    Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Iseman MD. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1993;329:784-791
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Farmer P, Bayona J, Becerra M, et al. The dilemma of MDR-TB in the global era. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:869-876
    Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Espinal MA, Dye C, Raviglione M, Kochi A. Rational “DOTS Plus“ for the control of MDR-TB. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:561-563
    Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Farmer P, Furin J, Bayona J, et al. Management of MDR-TB in resource-poor countries. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:643-645
    Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Telzak EE, Sepkowitz K, Alpert P, et al. Multidrug-resistant tuber-culosis in patients without HIV infection. N Engl J Med 1995;333:907-911
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Park SK, Kim CT, Song SD. Outcome of chemotherapy in 107 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis resistant to isoniazid and rifampin. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:877-884
    Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (56)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    K. Horo, É. Aka-Danguy, A. Kouassi Boko, A.S. N’gom, C.V. Gode, J.M. Ahui Brou, A.F. Motuom, T. Yacouba, F. Koante-Kone, M.T. Tcharman, N. Koffi. (2011) Tuberculose multirésistante : à propos de 81 patients suivis dans un service de pneumologie en Côte d’Ivoire. Revue de Pneumologie Clinique 67:2, 82-88
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    José A Caminero, Giovanni Sotgiu, Alimuddin Zumla, Giovanni Battista Migliori. (2010) Best drug treatment for multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 10:9, 621-629
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Eric Leibert, William N Rom. (2010) New drugs and regimens for treatment of TB. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 8:7, 801-813
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Min-Woong Kang, Hong Kwan Kim, Yong Soo Choi, Kwhanmien Kim, Young Mog Shim, Won-Jung Koh, Jhingook Kim. (2010) Surgical Treatment for Multidrug-Resistant and Extensive Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 89:5, 1597-1602
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Giovanni Battista Migliori, Morgan D'  Arcy Richardson, Giovanni Sotgiu, Christoph Lange. (2009) Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in the West. Europe and United States: Epidemiology, Surveillance, and Control. Clinics in Chest Medicine 30:4, 637-665
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Pierre Sellier, Veronique Delcey, Laurent Raskine, Marie-José Sanson-Le-Pors, Jean-François Bergmann. (2009) Moxifloxacin versus ethambutol in initial tuberculosis treatment. The Lancet 373:9682, 2198
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Seung-Kyu Park, Jin-Hee Kim, Hyungseok Kang, Jeong Su Cho, Raymond A. Smego. (2009) Pulmonary resection combined with isoniazid- and rifampin-based drug therapy for patients with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 13:2, 170-175
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Reda M. Lebcir, Jyoti Choudrie, Rifat A. Atun, Richard J. Coker. (2009) Using a decision support systems computer simulation model to examine HIV and tuberculosis: the Russian Federation. International Journal of Electronic Healthcare 5:1, 14
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Edward D Chan, Michael D Iseman. (2008) Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a review. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 21:6, 587-595
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Haifeng Wang, Hongsheng Lin, Gening Jiang. (2008) Pulmonary Resection in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Retrospective Study of 56 Cases. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 86:5, 1640-1645
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Amita Jain, Pratima Dixit. (2008) Multidrug resistant to extensively drug resistant tuberculosis: What is next?. Journal of Biosciences 33:4, 605-616
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Kristina Feja, Erin McNelley, Cindy S. Tran, Joseph Burzynski, Lisa Saiman. (2008) Management of Pediatric Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis and Latent Tuberculosis Infections in New York City From 1995 to 2003. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 27:10, 907-912
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    José R. Tost, Rafael Vidal, José Maldonado, Joan A. Caylà. (2008) Efectividad y tolerancia de las pautas de tratamiento antituberculoso sin isoniacida y/o rifampicina. Análisis de 85 casos. Archivos de Bronconeumología 44:9, 478-483
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Yong Soo Kwon, Yee Hyung Kim, Gee Young Suh, Man Pyo Chung, Hojoong Kim, O Jung Kwon, Yong Soo Choi, Kwhanmien Kim, Jhingook Kim, Young Mog Shim, Won‐Jung Koh. (2008) Treatment Outcomes for HIV‐Uninfected Patients with Multidrug‐Resistant and Extensively Drug‐Resistant Tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 47:4, 496-502
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Carlos Acuna‐Villaorduna, Anna Vassall, German Henostroza, Carlos Seas, Humberto Guerra, Lucy Vasquez, Nora Morcillo, Juan Saravia, Richard O’Brien, Mark D. Perkins, Jane Cunningham, Luis Llanos‐Zavalaga, Eduardo Gotuzzo. (2008) Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of Introduction of Rapid, Alternative Methods to Identify Multidrug‐Resistant Tuberculosis in Middle‐Income Countries. Clinical Infectious Diseases 47:4, 487-495
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Molly F. Franke, Sasha C. Appleton, Jaime Bayona, Fernando Arteaga, Eda Palacios, Karim Llaro, Sonya S. Shin, Mercedes C. Becerra, Megan B. Murray, Carole D. Mitnick. (2008) Risk Factors and Mortality Associated with Default from Multidrug‐Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment. Clinical Infectious Diseases 46:12, 1844-1851
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    S. Keshavjee, I.Y. Gelmanova, A.D. Pasechnikov, S.P. Mishustin, Y.G. Andreev, A. Yedilbayev, J.J. Furin, J.S. Mukherjee, M.L. Rich, E.A. Nardell, P.E. Farmer, J.Y. Kim, S.S. Shin. (2008) Treating Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Tomsk, Russia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1136:1, 1-11
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Chiang Chen-Yuan, Donald A Enarson, Paula I Fujiwara, Armand Van Deun, Lee Jen-Jyh. (2008) Strategies of extensively drug-resistant TB risk management for health workers and other care givers. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine 2:1, 47-54
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Doosoo Jeon, Dongok Shin, Hyungseok Kang, Nackmoon Sung, Kyungsoon Kweon, Eun Shin, Kyungsoon Kim, Myunghee Lee, Seungkyu Park. (2008) Trend of Multidrug and Extensively Drug Resistant Tuberculosis in a Tuberculosis Referral Hospital, 2001~2005. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 64:3, 187
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    F. Drobniewski, S. Rüsch-Gerdes, S. Hoffner. (2007) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (EUCAST document E.DEF 8.1) − Report of the Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis of the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Clinical Microbiology and Infection 13:12, 1144-1156
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Wing Wai YEW, Chi Chiu LEUNG. (2007) Management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: Update 2007. Respirology 0:0, 071031182005003-???
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    I. Sarı, V. Davutoglu, O. Ozer, M. Sucu. (2007) Tuberculosis as aetiology of so-called idiopathic pericarditis. International Journal of Clinical Practice 61:10, 1766-1766
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Ángel Domínguez-Castellano, Alfonso del Arco, Jesús Canueto-Quintero, Antonio Rivero-Román, José María Kindelán, Ricardo Creagh, Felipe Díez-García. (2007) Guía de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades Infecciosas (SAEI) sobre el tratamiento de la tuberculosis. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 25:8, 519-534
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Alberto Matteelli, Giovanni Battista Migliori, Daniela Cirillo, Rosella Centis, Enrico Girard, Mario Raviglione. (2007) Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis : epidemiology and control. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 5:5, 857-871
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Yves L. Janin. (2007) Antituberculosis drugs: Ten years of research. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 15:7, 2479-2513
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Marie-Laure Uffredi, Chantal Truffot-Pernot, Bertrand Dautzenberg, Muriel Renard, Vincent Jarlier, Jérôme Robert. (2007) An intervention programme for the management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in France. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 29:4, 434-439
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Biswajit Chakrabarti, Peter DO Davies. (2007) Key issues in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Future Microbiology 2:1, 51-61
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Jae Joon Yim. (2007) Recent Advances in Research for Tuberculosis. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases 62:6, 461
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Cesare Saltini. (2006) Chemotherapy and diagnosis of tuberculosis. Respiratory Medicine 100:12, 2085-2097
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Ye??im Ta??ova, T??nay Sarpel, Ay??e Seza Inal, Ne??e Saltoglu, Rengin Guzel, Behice Kurtaran. (2006) A Clinical Review of 40 Cases With Tuberculous Spondylitis in Adults. Neurosurgery Quarterly 16:4, 169-176
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Luigi Ruffo Codecasa, Giovanni Ferrara, Maurizio Ferrarese, Maria Antonietta Morandi, Valeria Penati, Carla Lacchini, Patrizia Vaccarino, Giovanni Battista Migliori. (2006) Long-term moxifloxacin in complicated tuberculosis patients with adverse reactions or resistance to first line drugs. Respiratory Medicine 100:9, 1566-1572
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Sonya S. Shin, Jennifer J. Furin, Felix Alcántara, Jaime Bayona, Epifanio Sánchez, Carole D. Mitnick. (2006) Long-term Follow-up for Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis. Emerging Infectious Diseases 12:4, 687-688
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Altan Kir, Ilhan Inci, Tulay Torun, Ali Atasalihi, Kemal Tahaoglu. (2006) Adjuvant resectional surgery improves cure rates in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 131:3, 693-696
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Kai Man Kam, Chi Wai Yip, Tze Leung Cheung, Hei Sing Tang, Oi Chi Leung, Mei Yuk Chan. (2006) Stepwise Decrease in Moxifloxacin Susceptibility amongst Clinical Isolates of Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Correlation with Ofloxacin Susceptibility. Microbial Drug Resistance 12:1, 7-11
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    2006. Antituberculosis drugs. , 321-326.
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Stephen C. Resch, Joshua A. Salomon, Megan Murray, Milton C. Weinstein. (2006) Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. PLoS Medicine 3:7, e241
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Seyed Mehdi Mirsaeidi, Payam Tabarsi, Kaveh Khoshnood, Majid Valiollah Pooramiri, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar, Seyed Davood Mansoori, Heydar Masjedi, Soheyla Zahirifard, Foroozan Mohammadi, Parisa Farnia, Mohammad Reza Masjedi, Ali Akbar Velayati. (2005) Treatment of multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in Iran. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 9:6, 317-322
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Yasuhiko Sugawara, Jun Nakajima, Yoji Kishi, Takashi Niiya, Junichi Kaneko, Masatoshi Makuuchi. (2005) Resection of a Pulmonary Lesion After Liver Transplantation: Report of a Case. Surgery Today 35:11, 976-978
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Marcos Burgos, Leah C. Gonzalez, E. Antonio Paz, Effie Gournis, L. Masae Kawamura, Gisela Schecter, Philip C. Hopewell, Charles L. Daley. (2005) Treatment of Multidrug‐Resistant Tuberculosis in San Francisco: An Outpatient‐Based Approach. Clinical Infectious Diseases 40:7, 968-975
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Vaira Leimane, Vija Riekstina, Timothy H Holtz, Evija Zarovska, Vija Skripconoka, Lorna E Thorpe, Kayla F Laserson, Charles D Wells. (2005) Clinical outcome of individualised treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Latvia: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet 365:9456, 318-326
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Sonya Shin, Jennifer Furin, Jaime Bayona, Kedar Mate, Jim Yong Kim, Paul Farmer. (2004) Community-based treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Lima, Peru: 7 years of experience. Social Science & Medicine 59:7, 1529-1539
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Yuji Shiraishi, Yutsuki Nakajima, Naoya Katsuragi, Makoto Kurai, Nobumasa Takahashi. (2004) Resectional surgery combined with chemotherapy remains the treatment of choice for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 128:4, 523-528
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Joia S Mukherjee, Michael L Rich, Adrienne R Socci, J Keith Joseph, Felix Alcántara Virú, Sonya S Shin, Jennifer J Furin, Mercedes C Becerra, Donna J Barry, Jim Yong Kim, Jaime Bayona, Paul Farmer, Mary C Smith Fawzi, Kwonjune J Seung. (2004) Programmes and principles in treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The Lancet 363:9407, 474-481
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Richard J. Coker. (2004) Review: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: public health challenges. Tropical Medicine and International Health 9:1, 25-40
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    A. S. Ginsburg, N. Hooper, N. Parrish, K. E. Dooley, S. E. Dorman, J. Booth, M. Diener-West, W. G. Merz, W. R. Bishai, T. R. Sterling. (2003) Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 37:11, 1448-1452
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Po-Liang Lu, Yi-Whey Lee, Chien-Fang Peng, Jih-Jin Tsai, Yen-Hsu Chen, Kao-Pin Hwang, Tyen-Po Chen. (2003) The decline of high drug resistance rate of pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from a southern Taiwan medical centre, 1996–2000. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 21:3, 239-243
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    J. B. Nachega, R. E. Chaisson. (2003) Tuberculosis Drug Resistance: A Global Threat. Clinical Infectious Diseases 36:Supplement 1, S24-S30
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Mitnick, Carole, Bayona, Jaime, Palacios, Eda, Shin, Sonya, Furin, Jennifer, Alcántara, Felix, Sánchez, Epifanio, Sarria, Madeleny, Becerra, Mercedes, Fawzi, Mary C. Smith, Kapiga, Saidi, Neuberg, Donna, Maguire, James H., Kim, Jim Yong, Farmer, Paul, . (2003) Community-Based Therapy for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Lima, Peru. New England Journal of Medicine 348:2, 119-128
    Full Text

  49. 49

    Joia S. Mukherjee, Sonya Shin, Jennifer Furin, Michael L. Rich, Fernet L??andre, J. Keith Joseph, Kwonjune Seung, Julio Acha, Irina Gelmanova, Ekaterina Goncharova, Alexander Pasechnikov, Felix Alc??ntara Viru, Paul Farmer. (2002) New Challenges in the Clinical Management of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice 11:6, 329-339
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Pedro G Suárez, Katherine Floyd, Jaime Portocarrero, Edith Alarcón, Elisabetta Rapiti, Gilbert Ramos, Cesar Bonilla, Ivan Sabogal, Isabel Aranda, Christopher Dye, Mario Raviglione, Marcos A Espinal. (2002) Feasibility and cost-effectiveness of standardised second-line drug treatment for chronic tuberculosis patients: a national cohort study in Peru. The Lancet 359:9322, 1980-1989
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Ronald A. Greenfield, Douglas A. Drevets, Linda J. Machado, Gene W. Voskuhl, Paul Cornea, Michael S. Bronze. (2002) Bacterial Pathogens as Biological Weapons and Agents of Bioterrorism. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 323:6, 299-315
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Francis A. Drobniewski, Yanina M. Balabanova. (2002) The diagnosis and management of multiple-drug-resistant tuberculosis at the beginning of the new millenium. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 6, S21-S31
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Barbara J Seaworth. (2002) Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 16:1, 73-105
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Small, Peter M., Fujiwara, Paula I., . (2001) Management of Tuberculosis in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 345:3, 189-200
    Full Text

  55. 55

    Farmer, Paul, . (2001) The Major Infectious Diseases in the World — To Treat or Not to Treat?. New England Journal of Medicine 345:3, 208-210
    Full Text

  56. 56

    &NA;. (2001) Multidrug-resistant TB 'a curable disease'. Inpharma Weekly &NA;:1298, 15
    CrossRef