Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

The Continuing Value of the Apgar Score for the Assessment of Newborn Infants

Brian M. Casey, M.D., Donald D. McIntire, Ph.D., and Kenneth J. Leveno, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2001; 344:467-471February 15, 2001

Abstract

Background

The 10-point Apgar score has been used to assess the condition and prognosis of newborn infants throughout the world for almost 50 years. Some investigators have proposed that measurement of pH in umbilical-artery blood is a more objective method of assessing newborn infants.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective cohort analysis of 151,891 live-born singleton infants without malformations who were delivered at 26 weeks of gestation or later at an inner-city public hospital between January 1988 and December 1998. Paired Apgar scores and umbilical-artery blood pH values were determined for 145,627 infants to assess which test best predicted neonatal death during the first 28 days after birth.

Results

For 13,399 infants born before term (at 26 to 36 weeks of gestation), the neonatal mortality rate was 315 per 1000 for infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3, as compared with 5 per 1000 for infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 7 to 10. For 132,228 infants born at term (37 weeks of gestation or later), the mortality rate was 244 per 1000 for infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3, as compared with 0.2 per 1000 for infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 7 to 10. The risk of neonatal death in term infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3 (relative risk, 1460; 95 percent confidence interval, 835 to 2555) was eight times the risk in term infants with umbilical-artery blood pH values of 7.0 or less (relative risk, 180; 95 percent confidence interval, 97 to 334).

Conclusions

The Apgar scoring system remains as relevant for the prediction of neonatal survival today as it was almost 50 years ago.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Mean (±SD) Five-Minute Apgar Scores in Preterm Infants According to Gestational Age (Curve) and Neonatal Death Rates for Infants with Five-Minute Apgar Scores of 0 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 10 (Bars).
Figure 3Timing of Neonatal Deaths among Preterm and Term Infants with Five-Minute Apgar Scores of 0 to 3.
Article

In 1952, Virginia Apgar proposed the Apgar score as a means of evaluating the physical condition of infants shortly after delivery.1 This scoring system, which encouraged delivery-room personnel to pay close attention to the newborn, was rapidly adopted in delivery rooms throughout the United States and elsewhere. Indeed, it has been said that “every baby born in a modern hospital anywhere in the world is looked at first through the eyes of Virginia Apgar.”2 Each of five easily identifiable characteristics — heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color — is assessed and assigned a value of 0 to 2. The total score is the sum of the five components, and a score of 7 or higher indicates that the baby's condition is good to excellent. The Apgar score is determined at one and five minutes after delivery and is therefore a rapid way to evaluate the physical condition of newborn infants. Of the two scores, the five-minute score has come to be regarded as the better predictor of survival in infancy.3

The value of the Apgar score has become controversial because of attempts to use it as a predictor of the neurologic development of the infant, a use for which it was never intended.4 For example, the use of the Apgar score to identify birth asphyxia is a misapplication, since conditions such as congenital anomalies, preterm birth, and administration of drugs to the mother can result in low scores that are not reflective of asphyxia.5 Subsequently, measurement of umbilical-artery blood pH has been widely adopted in the United States as an adjunct to the Apgar score for assessing the condition of newborn infants.6-8 The Committee on Obstetric Practice of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, in concert with the American Academy of Pediatrics, has issued a publication entitled “Use and Abuse of the Apgar Score” in an effort to emphasize the limitations of the Apgar system in identifying birth asphyxia and predicting neurologic outcome.9,10

We undertook this study to examine whether the original intent of the Apgar system, to predict survival during the neonatal period,11 remains pertinent almost 50 years after the introduction of the system into American obstetrical and pediatric practice.

Methods

Study Design

Selected obstetrical outcomes for all women who give birth at Parkland Hospital, Dallas, as well as the neonatal outcomes, are entered into a computerized data base. Nurses attending each delivery complete an obstetrical data sheet, and research nurses assess the data for consistency and completeness before they are stored electronically. Data on infants' outcomes are abstracted from discharge records. Parkland Hospital is a tax-supported institution serving Dallas County that has a level III neonatal intensive care unit12 adjacent to the labor and delivery units. The obstetrics service is staffed by house officers and faculty members of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, and the neonatology service is staffed by house officers and faculty members of the Department of Pediatrics.

Between January 1988 and December 1998, a total of 151,891 women delivered live-born singleton infants with gestational ages of 26 weeks or greater at Parkland Hospital. Infants less than 26 weeks of gestational age were excluded because their intrapartum treatment might have been influenced by concern about viability. Infants with major malformations identified by the time of discharge or at autopsy were also excluded. In all live-born infants, umbilical-artery blood samples were routinely drawn from a doubly clamped segment of the umbilical cord into heparinized 3-ml syringes and placed in ice for transport to the hospital laboratory for the measurement of blood gases and pH. The results were linked to the perinatal data base. Similarly, Apgar scores at one and five minutes were routinely assigned to all live-born infants, either by the nurses attending normal deliveries at term or by third-year pediatric house officers attending high-risk deliveries. The latter included all deliveries at less than 36 weeks of gestation and term deliveries with risk factors such as cesarean or forceps delivery, maternal fever during labor, and meconium-stained amniotic fluid. In addition, a resuscitation team consisting of a specially trained nurse from the neonatal intensive care unit, a respiratory therapist, and a fellow in neonatology was immediately available.

The outcome of interest was neonatal death during the first 28 days after birth. Preterm infants were defined as those born between 26 and 36 weeks of gestation, and term infants were defined as those born at or after 37 weeks of gestation. The gestational age assigned to each infant was based on the obstetrical estimate that was used to manage the care of the mother during the intrapartum period.

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed with SAS software (version 8.0, SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). The Mantel–Haenszel chi-square test for trend and the chi-square goodness-of-fit test were used for categorical data. Relative risks and 95 percent confidence intervals were calculated by the Mantel–Haenszel method. Continuous data are presented as means ±SD. All P values were derived from two-sided tests.

Results

Paired Apgar scores and umbilical-artery blood gas values (pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, partial pressure of oxygen, bicarbonate concentration, and base deficit) were available for 145,627 infants, of whom 13,399 (9 percent) were delivered before term and 132,228 (91 percent) were delivered at term. Of the infants whose outcomes are described in this report, 58 percent (84,122) were Hispanic, 26 percent (38,255) were black, 13 percent (19,174) were white, and 3 percent (4076) were of other racial or ethnic backgrounds. The mean maternal age was 24±6 years; 3 percent (3974) of the women were under the age of 16, and 4 percent (6498) were 35 years of age or older. A total of 56,391 women (39 percent) were delivering their first child.

The incidence and relative risk of neonatal death in preterm infants according to their Apgar scores at five minutes are shown in Table 1Table 1Incidence of Neonatal Death in 13,399 Singleton Infants Born before Term (at 26 to 36 Weeks of Gestation) in Relation to Apgar Scores at Five Minutes of Age.. The incidence of neonatal death was 315 per 1000 preterm infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3 but only 5 per 1000 for those with five-minute Apgar scores of 7 or greater (relative risk, 59; 95 percent confidence interval, 40 to 87). The incidence of neonatal death in preterm infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 4 to 6 was 72 per 1000 (relative risk, 13; 95 percent confidence interval, 9 to 20). The one-minute Apgar score was less useful in predicting neonatal death than the five-minute score (data not shown).

The mean five-minute Apgar score was related to gestational age in preterm infants (Figure 1Figure 1Mean (±SD) Five-Minute Apgar Scores in Preterm Infants According to Gestational Age (Curve) and Neonatal Death Rates for Infants with Five-Minute Apgar Scores of 0 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 10 (Bars).). For example, the mean score was 6.6±2.1 in infants born at 26 to 27 weeks of gestation, as compared with 8.7±0.8 in infants born at 34 to 36 weeks. However, the incidence of neonatal death was highest for five-minute Apgar scores of 3 or less, regardless of gestational age. For example, at 26 to 27 weeks of gestation, the neonatal death rate was 385 per 1000 live-born infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3, as compared with 147 per 1000 for those with scores of 4 to 6 (P=0.002).

Similar analyses were performed for infants delivered at or after 37 weeks of gestation (Table 2Table 2Incidence of Neonatal Death in 132,228 Singleton Infants Born at Term (37 Weeks of Gestation or Later) in Relation to Apgar Scores at Five Minutes of Age.). The incidence of neonatal death in term infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3 was 244 per 1000, whereas the incidence in term infants with scores of 7 or more was 0.2 per 1000. The mean five-minute Apgar score for infants delivered at 37 to 38 weeks was 8.9±0.4 and was not significantly different for infants born at 39 to 40 weeks and those born at 41 to 42 weeks. The neonatal death rates were related to the five-minute Apgar scores in term infants, regardless of gestational age (Figure 2Figure 2Neonatal Death Rates in Term Infants with Five-Minute Apgar Scores of 0 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 10, According to Gestational Age.). For example, at 39 to 40 weeks, the neonatal death rate was 180 per 1000 in infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3, as compared with 12 per 1000 in infants with scores of 4 to 6 (P<0.001) and 0.1 per 1000 in infants with scores of 7 to 10 (P<0.001).

The relative risks of neonatal death are shown in Table 3Table 3Relative Risk of Neonatal Death in Preterm and Term Infants with Five-Minute Apgar Scores of 0 to 3 and Various Degrees of Umbilical-Artery Blood Acidemia. for both preterm infants (137 deaths) and term infants (48 deaths) with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3 or umbilical-artery blood pH values of 7.0 or less at birth. These cutoff values were selected for analysis because they are thresholds commonly used to assess the condition of newborn infants.3 For neither preterm nor term infants did the severity of acidemia appreciably modify the relative risk of neonatal death associated with five-minute Apgar scores of 3 or less. A combination of five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3 and pH values of 7.0 or less did, however, increase the risk of neonatal death in both preterm and term infants. This increased risk persisted when infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3, pH values of 7.0 or less, or both were compared with infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 7 to 10 and pH values of more than 7.0.

The timing of neonatal death in preterm and term infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3 is shown in Figure 3Figure 3Timing of Neonatal Deaths among Preterm and Term Infants with Five-Minute Apgar Scores of 0 to 3.. The poor condition at birth that was reflected in very low five-minute scores (0 to 3) was significantly associated with early neonatal death (at no more than one day of age) in both preterm and term infants (P<0.001 and P=0.009 for trend, respectively). The neonatal deaths were grouped according to their apparent cause: those attributed to complications of prematurity (94 infants), sepsis (37 infants), hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy (24 infants), and unknown causes (30 infants). Hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy was defined by the presence of seizures or brain death determined electroencephalographically. The relative risk of neonatal death according to the cause was analyzed in infants with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3, as compared with infants with scores of 7 to 10. Apgar scores of 0 to 3 at five minutes were not significantly associated with the cause of death in preterm infants (data not shown). Deaths due to hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy, however, were significantly more likely in term infants with five-minute scores of 0 to 3 (relative risk, 13; 95 percent confidence interval, 3 to 58).

Discussion

In 1952, Apgar reported that neonatal survival through 28 days of age was related to the condition of the infant in the delivery room.1,3 Our analysis of the relation of five-minute Apgar scores to neonatal survival indicates that the Apgar score is just as meaningful today as it was almost 50 years ago. In both preterm and term infants, survival increased as Apgar scores increased. Among both preterm and term infants, those with five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3 had the highest risk of neonatal death. In term infants, the risk of neonatal death was 0.2 per 1000 for those with Apgar scores of 7 to 10, as compared with 244 per 1000 for those with scores of 0 to 3 at birth. This finding parallels the original results reported by Apgar.13 Although preterm infants had low five-minute Apgar scores that reflected gestational age, very low scores (0 to 3) were still associated with an increased risk of neonatal death. Moreover, these very low five-minute Apgar scores were related to the time of neonatal death in both preterm and term infants; specifically, neonatal deaths in infants with low scores occurred soon after birth.

The five-minute Apgar score was a better predictor of neonatal outcome than was measurement of umbilical-artery blood pH, even for newborn infants with severe acidemia. However, the combination of five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3 and umbilical-artery blood pH values of 7.0 or less increased the relative risk of death in both preterm and term infants.

The limitations of our analysis include the possibility that differences in the treatment of immature infants might influence the risk of neonatal death. For example, infants with very low Apgar scores who were delivered at 26 weeks of gestation might have been treated less aggressively than infants delivered at 26 weeks who had higher scores. However, the treatment approach used during the study was to provide all necessary support for infants delivered at 26 weeks of gestation or later.14 (Infants born before 26 weeks of gestation were not included in the study.)

Another limitation of this study is the small number of infants with very low five-minute Apgar scores. During a period of 11 years, five-minute Apgar scores of 0 to 3 were assigned to only 178 of the 145,627 infants born at our hospital who were included in our study. Nonetheless, our results suggest that very low five-minute scores, although rare, continue to be strongly predictive of early neonatal death. Finally, a potential ascertainment bias is caused by the exclusion of 6264 infants for whom umbilical-artery blood gas results were not available. Indeed, the incidence of neonatal death in this group of infants was 4.5 per 1000, as compared with 1.2 per 1000 (P=0.002) in infants for whom blood gas analyses were performed. However, an Apgar score of 0 to 3 at five minutes remained a significant predictor of neonatal death in both preterm and term infants, whether or not umbilical-blood gas analyses were available.

We cannot dispute the contemporary viewpoint that use of the Apgar score for the prediction of long-term neurologic outcome is inappropriate.4,9,10 However, the poor performance of the Apgar system as a predictor of neurologic development, a purpose for which it was never intended, should not undermine the continuing value of assigning Apgar scores to newborn infants. In our view, it should not be surprising that features of vital activity such as heart rate, respiration, and neuromuscular function reflect the prognosis for neonatal survival even in premature infants. We conclude that the Apgar system continues to be relevant to the prediction of neonatal outcome after almost half a century.

Source Information

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Casey at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390, or at .

References

References

  1. 1

    Apgar V. Proposal for new method of evaluation of newborn infant. Anesth Analg 1953;32:260-267
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Skolnick AA. Apgar quartet plays perinatologist's instruments. JAMA 1996;276:1939-1940[Erratum, JAMA 1997;277:1762.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Drage JS, Kennedy C, Schwarz BK. The Apgar score as an index of neonatal mortality: a report from the Collaborative Study of Cerebral Palsy. Obstet Gynecol 1964;24:222-230
    Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Apgar scores as predictors of chronic neurologic disability. Pediatrics 1981;68:36-44
    Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Gilstrap LC III, Hauth JC, Hankins GDV, Beck AW. Second-stage fetal heart rate abnormalities and type of neonatal acidemia. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:191-195
    Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Gilstrap LC III, Leveno KJ, Burris J, Williams ML, Little BB. Diagnosis of birth asphyxia on the basis of fetal pH, Apgar score, and newborn cerebral dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:825-830
    Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Winkler CL, Hauth JC, Tucker JM, Owen J, Brumfield CG. Neonatal complications at term as related to the degree of umbilical artery acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:637-641
    Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Goodwin TM, Belai I, Hernandez P, Durand M, Paul RH. Asphyxial complications in the term newborn with severe umbilical acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1506-1512
    Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Use and abuse of the Apgar score. In: Compendium of selected publications. No. 174. Washington, D.C.: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, July 1996.

  10. 10

    Use and abuse of the Apgar score. Pediatrics 1996;98:141-142
    Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Apgar V, Holaday DA, James LS, Weisbrot IM, Berrien C. Evaluation of the newborn infant -- second report. JAMA 1958;168:1985-1988
    Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Guidelines for perinatal care. 4th ed. Elk Grove Village, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatrics, August 1997:4-6.

  13. 13

    Apgar V, James LS. Further observations on the newborn scoring system. Am J Dis Child 1962;104:419-428
    Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant NF. Williams obstetrics. 18th ed. East Norwalk, Conn.: Appleton & Lange, 1989:748.

Citing Articles (98)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Tina A. Leone, Neil N. Finer. 2012. Resuscitation in the Delivery Room. , 328-340.
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Henry H. Cheng, Melvin C. Almodovar, Peter C. Laussen, David Wypij, Angelo Polito, David W. Brown, Sitaram M. Emani, Frank A. Pigula, Catherine K. Allan, John M. Costello. (2011) Outcomes and Risk Factors for Mortality in Premature Neonates With Critical Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatric Cardiology 32:8, 1139-1146
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Scott E. Regenbogen. (2011) Intraoperative Performance Evaluation in Colorectal Surgery. Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery 22:4, 210-216
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Jheng-Yan Lan, Mao-Hsien Wang, Shou-Zen Fan, Li-Kuei Chen. (2011) Impact of anesthetic methods on neonatal outcome in women receiving temporary balloon occlusion of the common iliac artery during cesarean section for placenta accreta. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 50:4, 515-517
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Mirosław Jarosz, Regina Wierzejska, Magdalena Siuba. (2011) Maternal caffeine intake and its effect on pregnancy outcomes. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Yunxia Fan, Muhuo Ji, Lina Zang, Wenhui Wang, Qi Yin, Jian Xu, Jianjun Yang. (2011) Comparison of epidural tramadol-ropivacaine and fentanyl-ropivacaine for labor analgesia: A prospective randomized study. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 116:4, 252-257
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Nathan L. Pace, Leopold H.J. Eberhart, Peter R. Kranke. (2011) Quantifying prognosis with risk predictions. European Journal of Anaesthesiology1
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Allison M. Carelli, Christine J. Ren, Heekoung Allison Youn, Erica B. Friedman, Anne E. Finger, Benjamin H. Lok, Marina S. Kurian, George A. Fielding. (2011) Impact of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding on Pregnancy, Maternal Weight, and Neonatal Health. Obesity Surgery 21:10, 1552-1558
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Z. C. Luo, F. Simonet, S. Q. Wei, H. Xu, E. Rey, W. D. Fraser. (2011) Diabetes in pregnancy may differentially affect neonatal outcomes for twins and singletons. Diabetic Medicine 28:9, 1068-1073
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Sreekanth Viswanathan, Bindu Manyam, Timur Azhibekov, Maroun J. Mhanna. (2011) Risk factors associated with acute kidney injury in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Pediatric Nephrology
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Mia L. van der Kop, Mark S. Pearce, Leanne Dahlgren, Anne Synnes, Dessa Sadovnick, Ana-Luiza Sayao, Helen Tremlett. (2011) Neonatal and delivery outcomes in women with multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 70:1, 41-50
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Atul A. Gawande, Scott E. Regenbogen. (2011) Critical Need for Objective Assessment of Postsurgical Patients. Anesthesiology 114:6, 1269-1270
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Han-Yang Chen, Suneet P. Chauhan, Cande V. Ananth, Anthony M. Vintzileos, Alfred Z. Abuhamad. (2011) Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and its relationship to neonatal and infant mortality in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 204:6, 491.e1-491.e10
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    H. OHLSSON, O. WINSÖ. (2011) Assessment of the Surgical Apgar Score in a Swedish setting. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 55:5, 524-529
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Joanne Lagatta, Ke Yan, Raymond Hoffmann. (2011) The association between 5-min Apgar score and mortality disappears after 24 h at the borderline of viability. Acta Paediatricano-no
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Narongsak Nakwan, Narongwit Nakwan, Jeerawan Wannaro. (2011) Predicting mortality in infants with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn with the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-Version II (SNAP-II) in Thai neonates. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 39:3, 311-315
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Jiong Li, Jørn Olsen, Mogens Vestergaard, Carsten Obel. (2011) Low Apgar Scores and Risk of Childhood Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. The Journal of Pediatrics 158:5, 775-779
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Thomas H. Wuerz, Scott E. Regenbogen, Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, Henrik Malchau, Harry E. Rubash, Atul A. Gawande, David M. Kent. (2011) The Surgical Apgar Score in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 469:4, 1119-1126
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    ULRIK SCHIØLER KESMODEL, LINE RIIS JØLVING. (2011) Measuring and improving quality in obstetrics - the implementation of national indicators in Denmark. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 90:4, 295-304
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Tae Hwan Kil, Ji Yeon Han, Jun Bum Kim, Gyeong Ok Ko, Young Hyeok Lee, Kil Young Kim, Jae Woo Lim. (2011) A study on the measurement of the nucleated red blood cell (nRBC) count based on birth weight and its correlation with perinatal prognosis in infants with very low birth weights. Korean Journal of Pediatrics 54:2, 69
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    George A. Gregory, Claire Brett. 2011. Neonatology for Anesthesiologists. , 512-553.
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Sai Ma, Brian Karl Finch. (2010) Birth Outcome Measures and Infant Mortality. Population Research and Policy Review 29:6, 865-891
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Henry Chong Lee, Mohammad Subeh, Jeffrey B. Gould. (2010) Low Apgar score and mortality in extremely preterm neonates born in the United States. Acta Paediatrica 99:12, 1785-1789
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Miriam Martinez-Biarge, Jesus Diez-Sebastian, Mary A. Rutherford, Frances M. Cowan. (2010) Outcomes after central grey matter injury in term perinatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Human Development 86:11, 675-682
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Eva Pagano, Barbara De Rota, Alberto Ferrando, Michele Petrinco, Franco Merletti, Dario Gregori. (2010) An economic evaluation of water birth: the cost-effectiveness of mother well-being. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16:5, 916-919
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Marianne Thoresen. (2010) Patient selection and prognostication with hypothermia treatment. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 15:5, 247-252
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    S. Saria, A. K. Rajani, J. Gould, D. Koller, A. A. Penn. (2010) Integration of Early Physiological Responses Predicts Later Illness Severity in Preterm Infants. Science Translational Medicine 2:48, 48ra65-48ra65
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    KIRSTEN R HEINEMAN, SACHA LA BASTIDE-VAN GEMERT, VACLAV FIDLER, KARIN J MIDDELBURG, AREND F BOS, MIJNA HADDERS-ALGRA. (2010) Construct validity of the Infant Motor Profile: relation with prenatal, perinatal, and neonatal risk factors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 52:9, e209-e215
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Sebastian Straube, Manfred Voigt, Gerhard Jorch, Ernst Hallier, Volker Briese, Ulrike Borchardt. (2010) Investigation of the association of Apgar score with maternal socio-economic and biological factors: an analysis of German perinatal statistics. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 282:2, 135-141
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    C. Wang, G. Xie, B. Cheng, L. Du, L. Shi, L. Tan, Q. Shu, X. Fang. (2010) Performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality, Pediatric Index of Mortality and PIM2 in term Chinese neonates. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 56:4, 235-241
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Robert D. Sanders, Helen J. Manning, Nicola J. Robertson, Daqing Ma, A. David Edwards, Henrik Hagberg, Mervyn Maze. (2010) Preconditioning and Postinsult Therapies for Perinatal Hypoxic–Ischemic Injury at Term. Anesthesiology 113:1, 233-249
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    A.E. R. Merién, J. van de Ven, B.W. Mol, S. Houterman, S.G. Oei. (2010) Multidisciplinary Team Training in a Simulation Setting for Acute Obstetric Emergencies. Obstetrics & Gynecology 115:5, 1021-1031
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    David R. Gambling, Kimberly Robbins McLaughin. (2010) Ephedrine and Phenylephrine Use during Cesarean Delivery. Anesthesiology 112:5, 1287-1288
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Warwick D. Ngan Kee, Kim S. Khaw. (2010) Ephedrine and Phenylephrine Use during Cesarean Delivery. Anesthesiology 112:5, 1290-1294
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    H Xu, F Simonet, Z-C Luo. (2010) Optimal birth weight percentile cut-offs in defining small- or large-for-gestational-age. Acta Paediatrica 99:4, 550-555
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Ching-Chi Chi, Shu-Hui Wang, Gudula Kirtschig, Fenella Wojnarowska. (2010) Systematic review of the safety of topical corticosteroids in pregnancy. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 62:4, 694-705
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Antonia Costa, Diogo Ayres-de-Campos, Fernanda Costa, Cristina Santos, Joao Bernardes. (2009) Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 201:5, 464.e1-464.e6
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Mario Rüdiger, Helmut Küster, Egbert Herting, Angelika Berger, Christoph Müller, Berndt Urlesberger, Burkhard Simma, Christian F Poets, Roland R Wauer, Edda Tschirch. (2009) Variations of Apgar score of very low birth weight infants in different neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatrica 98:9, 1433-1436
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    M.C. Veronesi, S. Panzani, M. Faustini, A. Rota. (2009) An Apgar scoring system for routine assessment of newborn puppy viability and short-term survival prognosis. Theriogenology 72:3, 401-407
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Ching-Chi Chi, Chia-Wen Lee, Fenella Wojnarowska, Gudula Kirtschig, Ching-Chi Chi. 2009. Safety of topical corticosteroids in pregnancy. .
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    C. Jason Wang, Marc N. Elliott, Jeannette Rogowski, Nelson Lim, Jessica A. Ratner, Mark A. Schuster. (2009) Factors Influencing the Enrollment of Eligible Extremely-Low-Birth-Weight Children in the Part C Early Intervention Program. Academic Pediatrics 9:4, 283-287
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    E Nagy, H Orvos, J Bakki, A Pal. (2009) Sex-differences in Apgar scores for full-term neonates. Acta Paediatrica 98:5, 898-900
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Sandip M. Prasad, Marcos Ferreria, Alexander M. Berry, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Jerome P. Richie, Atul A. Gawande, Jim C. Hu. (2009) Surgical Apgar Outcome Score: Perioperative Risk Assessment for Radical Cystectomy. The Journal of Urology 181:3, 1046-1053
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Patricia AM van Iersel, Saskia CM Bakker, Arnold JH Jonker, Mijna Hadders-Algra. (2009) Quality of general movements in term infants with asphyxia. Early Human Development 85:1, 7-12
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    F. Gold, M.-H. Blond, C. Lionnet, I. De Montgolfier. 2009. L'accueil du Nouveau-Né Normal. , 13-21.
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Stephen J. Bagnato, Eileen McKeating-Esterle, Antonio Fevola, Paola Bortolamasi, John T. Neisworth. (2008) Valid Use of Clinical Judgment (Informed Opinion) for Early Intervention Eligibility. Infants & Young Children 21:4, 334-349
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Pallab Basu, Sabyasachi Som, Nabendu Choudhuri, Harendranath Das. (2008) Correlation between Apgar score and urinary uric acid to creatinine ratio in perinatal asphyxia. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry 23:4, 361-364
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Pénélope Troude, Laurence Foix L'Hélias, Anne-Marie Raison-Boulley, Christine Castel, Jean Bouyer, Elise de La Rochebrochard. (2008) Apgar scores reported in personal child health records: Validity for epidemiological studies?. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Anna Locatelli, Maddalena Incerti, Alessandro Ghidini, Massimiliano Greco, Elisabetta Villa, Giuseppe Paterlini. (2008) Factors associated with umbilical artery acidemia in term infants with low Apgar scores at 5min. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 139:2, 146-150
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Scott E. Regenbogen, R Todd Lancaster, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Caprice C. Greenberg, Matthew M. Hutter, Atul A. Gawande. (2008) Does the Surgical Apgar Score Measure Intraoperative Performance?. Annals of Surgery 248:2, 320-328
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Ching-Chi Chi, Chia-Wen Lee, Fenella Wojnarowska, Gudula Kirtschig, Ching-Chi Chi. 2008. Perinatal safety of topical corticosteroids for pregnant women. .
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Rintaro Mori, Jun Shiraishi, Hirokuni Negishi, Masanori Fujimura. (2008) Predictive value of Apgar score in infants with very low birth weight. Acta Paediatrica 97:6, 720-723
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Kristina Forsblad, Karin Källén, Karel Maršál, Lena Hellström-Westas. (2008) Short-term outcome predictors in infants born at 23-24 gestational weeks. Acta Paediatrica 97:5, 551-556
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    NA Habib, AK Daltveit, P Bergsjø, J Shao, O Oneko, RT Lie. (2008) Maternal HIV status and pregnancy outcomes in northeastern Tanzania: a registry-based study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 115:5, 616-624
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    LIESBETH DUIJTS, LIESBETH E. BAKKER-JONGES, JOOST A. M. LABOUT, VINCENT W. V. JADDOE, ALBERT HOFMAN, ERIC A. P. STEEGERS, JACQUES J. M. VAN DONGEN, HERBERT HOOIJKAAS, HENRIËTTE A. MOLL. (2008) Perinatal Stress Influences Lymphocyte Subset Counts in Neonates. The Generation R Study. Pediatric Research 63:3, 292-298
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Ramesh Agarwal, Ashish Jain, Ashok K. Deorari, Vinod K. Paul. (2008) Post-resuscitation management of asphyxiated neonates. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics 75:2, 175-180
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    F PISANI, A BARILLI, L SISTI, G BEVILACQUA, S SERI. (2008) Preterm infants with video-EEG confirmed seizures: Outcome at 30 months of age. Brain and Development 30:1, 20-30
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Malcolm R. BATTIN, Lesley M. E. McCOWAN, Maha GEORGE-HADDAD, John M. D. THOMPSON. (2007) Fetal growth restriction and other factors associated with neonatal death in New Zealand. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 47:6, 457-463
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    A Amir, P Merlob, N Linder, L Sirota, G Klinger. (2007) Mortality of full-term infants during the first month of life in a tertiary care hospital. Journal of Perinatology 27:10, 620-622
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    F BRENCK, B HARTMANN, A JOST, R ROHRIG, R OBAID, D BRUGGMANN, H HARBACH, A JUNGER. (2007) Examining the influence of maternal bradycardia on neonatal outcome using automated data collection. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 16:3, 208-213
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    M.G. Sridhar, Sajita Setia, Mathew John, Vishnu Bhat, H. Nandeesha, V. Sathiyapriya. (2007) Oxidative stress varies with the mode of delivery in intrauterine growth retardation: Association with Apgar score. Clinical Biochemistry 40:9-10, 688-691
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    R A Polin, T M Randis, R Sahni. (2007) Systemic hypothermia to decrease morbidity of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Journal of Perinatology 27, S47-S58
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Ze D. Jiang, Xu Xiu, Dorothea M. Brosi, Xiao M. Shao, Andrew R. Wilkinson. (2007) Sub-optimal function of the auditory brainstem in term infants with transient low Apgar scores. Clinical Neurophysiology 118:5, 1088-1096
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    G. Tonni, B. Ferrari, C. De Felice, A. Ventura. (2007) Fetal acid-base and neonatal status after general and neuraxial anesthesia for elective cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 97:2, 143-146
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    G. Daskalakis, E. Anastasakis, N. Papantoniou, S. Mesogitis, N. Thomakos, A. Antsaklis. (2007) Cesarean vs. vaginal birth for term breech presentation in 2 different study periods. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 96:3, 162-166
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Linda Hogan, Ingemar Ingemarsson, Kristina Thorngren-Jerneck, Andreas Herbst. (2007) How often is a low 5-min Apgar score in term newborns due to asphyxia?. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 130:2, 169-175
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Atul A. Gawande, Mary R. Kwaan, Scott E. Regenbogen, Stuart A. Lipsitz, Michael J. Zinner. (2007) An Apgar Score for Surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 204:2, 201-208
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Kristina Forsblad, Karin Källén, Karel Maršál, Lena Hellström-Westas. (2007) Apgar score predicts short-term outcome in infants born at 25 gestational weeks. Acta Paediatrica 96:2, 166-171
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    MP Little, M-R Järvelin, DE Neasham, T Lissauer, PJ Steer. (2007) Factors associated with fall in neonatal intubation rates in the United Kingdom - prospective study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 114:2, 156-164
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Zhong-Cheng Luo, Fabienne Simonet, Na An, Feng-Ying Bao, Francois Audibert, William D. Fraser. (2006) Effect on Neonatal Outcomes in Gestational Hypertension in Twin Compared With Singleton Pregnancies. Obstetrics & Gynecology 108:5, 1138-1144
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Yuelian Sun, Mogens Vestergaard, Jin Liang Zhu, Kreesten M. Madsen, J??rn Olsen. (2006) Paternal Age and Apgar Scores of Newborn Infants. Epidemiology 17:4, 473-474
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Elliott K. Main, Dan Moore, Bill Farrell, Leon D. Schimmel, Robert J. Altman, Carol Abrahams, Mary Campbell Bliss, Laurie Polivy, Jacci Sterling. (2006) Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 194:6, 1644-1651
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Linda L. Magnusson, Lennart Bodin, Helena Wennborg. (2006) Adverse pregnancy outcomes in offspring of fathers working in biomedical research laboratories. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 49:6, 468-473
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Yuelian Sun, Mogens Vestergaard, Carsten B??cker Pedersen, Jakob Christensen, J??rn Olsen. (2006) Apgar Scores and Long-Term Risk of Epilepsy. Epidemiology 17:3, 296-301
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    N. Prapas, I. Kalogiannidis, I. Prapas, P. Xiromeritis, A. Karagiannidis, G. Makedos. (2006) Twin gestation in older women: antepartum, intrapartum complications, and perinatal outcomes. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 273:5, 293-297
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    ALISTAIR G.S. PHILIP. (2005) The Evolution of Neonatology. Pediatric Research 58:4, 799-815
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    J. Ø. Berle, A. Mykletun, A. K. Daltveit, S. Rasmussen, F. Holsten, A. A. Dahl. (2005) Neonatal outcomes in offspring of women with anxiety and depression during pregnancy. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 8:3, 181-189
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Antoine G. M. Aya, Nathalie Vialles, Issam Tanoubi, Roseline Mangin, Jean-Michel Ferrer, Colette Robert, Jacques Ripart, Jean-Emmanuel de La Coussaye. (2005) Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension: A Risk Comparison Between Patients with Severe Preeclampsia and Healthy Women Undergoing Preterm Cesarean Delivery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 101:3, 869-875
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    K.S. Joseph. (2005) Form should follow function in epidemiologic modeling: Author's response. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 58:9, 965-966
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Ola Saugstad, Siddarth Ramji, Terje Rootwelt, Maximo Vento. (2005) Response to resuscitation of the newborn: Early prognostic variables. Acta Paediatrica 94:7, 890-895
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    Ola Didrik Saugstad, Siddarth Ramji, Terje Rootwelt, Maximo Vento. (2005) Response to resuscitation of the newborn: Early prognostic variables. Acta Paediatrica 94:7, 890-895
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Mieczyslaw Finster, Margaret Wood. (2005) The Apgar Score Has Survived the Test of Time. Anesthesiology 102:4, 855-857
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Bhavneet Bharti, Sahul Bharti. (2005) A review of the Apgar score indicated that contextualization was required within the contemporary perinatal and neonatal care framework in different settings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 58:2, 121-129
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Valerie A. Arkoosh. (2005) Neonatal Resuscitation. Advances in Anesthesia 23, 75-94
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    A. Kansal, M. Mohta, A. K. Sethi, A. Tyagi, P. Kumar. (2005) Randomised trial of intravenous infusion of ephedrine or mephentermine for management of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Anaesthesia 60:1, 28-34
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Georg Hansmann. (2004) Neonatal resuscitation on air: it is time to turn down the oxygen tanks?. The Lancet 364:9442, 1293-1294
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    H Patel, PJ Beeby. (2004) Resuscitation beyond 10 minutes of term babies born without signs of life. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 40:3, 136-138
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    CL Roberts, CS Algert, B Peat, DJ Henderson-Smart. (2004) Trends in place of birth for preterm infants in New South Wales, 1992-2001. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 40:3, 139-143
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    DSY Chong, J Karlberg. (2004) Refining the Apgar score cut-off point for newborns at risk. Acta Paediatrica 93:1, 53-59
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Robert A. Dyer, Ilse Els, Josef Farbas, Gregory J. Torr, Leann K. Schoeman, Michael F. James. (2003) Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing General with Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Preeclamptic Patients with a Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Trace. Anesthesiology 99:3, 561-569
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Elliot B. Sloane, Matthew J. Liberatore, Robert L. Nydick, Wenhong Luo, Q.B. Chung. (2003) Using the analytic hierarchy process as a clinical engineering tool to facilitate an iterative, multidisciplinary, microeconomic health technology assessment. Computers & Operations Research 30:10, 1447-1465
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    R. Singh, S. Doshi, V. G. Sutija, B. Shah, S. Sidhu, M. Vezmar, L. Glass, M. Gudavalli. (2003) The effects of birth weight discordance and prematurity on twin neonatal outcome. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 31:2, 105-110
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    W NGANKEE. (2003) Obstetric neuraxial anaesthesia: which vasopressor should we be using?. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 12:1, 55-56
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    David W. Cooper, Mark Carpenter, Paul Mowbray, William R. Desira, David M. Ryall, Manmohan S. Kokri. (2002) Fetal and Maternal Effects of Phenylephrine and Ephedrine during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery. Anesthesiology 97:6, 1582-1590
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    Rajiv Aggarwal, Ashok K. Deorari, Vinod K. Paul. (2001) Post-resuscitation management of asphyxiated neonates. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics 68:12, 1149-1153
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    &NA;. (2001) EPIDEMIOLOGIC REPORTS. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest 21:3, 97-105
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    Fumi Yanagidate, Yoshihiro Hamaya, Shuji Dohi. (2001) Clonidine Premedication Reduces Maternal Requirement for Intravenous Morphine After Cesarean Delivery Without Affecting Newborn's Outcome. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 26:5, 461-467
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    Papile, Lu-Ann, . (2001) The Apgar Score in the 21st Century. New England Journal of Medicine 344:7, 519-520
    Full Text