Book Review

Parting Company: Understanding the loss of a loved one — The caregiver's journey

N Engl J Med 2000; 342:523February 17, 2000

Article

Parting Company: Understanding the loss of a loved one — The caregiver's journey
By Cynthia Pearson and Margaret L. Stubbs. 348 pp. Seattle, Seal Press, 1999. $18.95. ISBN: 1-58005-019-0

The authors of this interesting and original book describe themselves as “lay caregivers of dying loved ones who have insights of interest to others like ourselves and to policy makers who would help us in our task.” The seven-year study on which the book is based is original in three respects: the focus is on the care giver rather than the dying patient, the setting is primarily the home rather than a hospital or other institution, and the care giver is primarily a family member who may be assisted by a hospice nurse or other professional but who bears the day-to-day responsibility. The authors avow a feminist point of view, but this does not greatly intrude on the 14 case studies or interviews that make up most of the book. Indeed, 4 of the interviewees are men, and nearly half the 14 are professionals who are working with the family member.

Pearson and Stubbs recognize that there is no magic solution for the frequent despair felt by an inexperienced family care giver. Their chief recommendations include providing the lay care giver with more information on and better preparation for the often ugly realities of death and dying, improving communication between the care giver and the professionals involved, and increasing understanding of the term “palliative care,” with more emphasis placed on pain management.

All of this is good advice, but what is missing is a greater recognition of the underlying role of demographic and economic factors. A century ago, a dying patient rarely lived more than a few days or weeks. Today, patients with stroke and other chronic illnesses may require extensive care for months or even years. Also, many, if not most, wives and daughters are now working outside the home — a factor that causes them to assume a double burden if they are handling much of the care of the patient.

The authors' well-documented and justifiable cri de coeur regarding the burden that is too often placed on the care giver has been reinforced by the findings of a recent study sponsored by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company of the financial toll exacted from care givers as well as threats to their health (Sara Rimer, “Study Details Sacrifices in Caring for Elderly Kin,” New York Times, Nov. 27, 1999). Too recent to be noted in the book, but coming almost as an answer to their plea, is the plan of the Journal of the American Medical Association to devote an issue in November to care at the end of life.

What we also need are some realistic proposals for the financing of long-term care. Meanwhile, we should build on whatever practical approaches exist. In my opinion, the authors condemn home care much too broadly, although the value of home care is often oversold for sentimental as well as financial reasons. Hospice care is undervalued. Continuing-care retirement communities, which combine long-term professional care of dying patients who are older than 65 years with extensive support for spouses and families, are not mentioned, nor are the pioneering initiatives supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Last Acts campaign, which seeks to increase awareness of the need to improve care at the end of life.

Despite these omissions, Parting Company is a substantial contribution to the growing literature on death and dying. It would be a useful addition to required-reading lists in medical and other schools of the health professions.

Anne R. Somers, D.Sc.
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104

Citing Articles (1)

Citing Articles

1. 1

   Michael D. Lagios, Melvin J. Silverstein. (2001) Sentinel Node Biopsy for Patients With DCIS: A Dangerous and Unwarranted Direction. Annals of Surgical Oncology 8:4, 275-277
   CrossRef