Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Effects of Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke at One Year

Thomas G. Kwiatkowski, M.D., Richard B. Libman, M.D., Michael Frankel, M.D., Barbara C. Tilley, Ph.D., Lewis B. Morgenstern, M.D., Mei Lu, Ph.D., Joseph P. Broderick, M.D., Christopher A. Lewandowski, M.D., John R. Marler, M.D., Steven R. Levine, M.D., and Thomas Brott, M.D. for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study Group

N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1781-1787June 10, 1999

Abstract

Background

In 1995, the two-part National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study found that patients who were treated with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) within three hours after the onset of symptoms of acute ischemic stroke were at least 30 percent more likely than patients given placebo to have minimal or no disability three months after the stroke. It was unknown, however, whether the benefit would be sustained for longer periods.

Methods

In the NINDS trial, a total of 624 patients with stroke were randomly assigned to receive either t-PA or placebo. We collected outcome data over a period of 12 months after the occurrence of stroke. The primary outcome measure was a “favorable outcome,” defined as minimal or no disability as measured by the Barthel index, the modified Rankin Scale, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale. We assessed the treatment effect using a global statistic.

Results

Using an intention-to-treat analysis for the combined results of the two parts of the trial at 6 months and 12 months, we found that the global statistic favored the t-PA group (odds ratio for a favorable outcome at 6 months, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 2.3; odds ratio at 12 months, 1.7;95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 2.3). The patients treated with t-PA were at least 30 percent more likely to have minimal or no disability at 12 months than were the placebo-treated patients (absolute increase in the proportion with a favorable outcome, 11 to 13 percentage points). There was no significant difference in mortality at 12 months between the t-PA group and the placebo group (24 percent vs. 28 percent, P=0.29). There was no interaction between the type of stroke identified at base line and treatment with respect to the long-term response. The rate of recurrent stroke at 12 months was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

During 12 months of follow-up, the patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with t-PA within three hours after the onset of symptoms were more likely to have minimal or no disability than the patients given placebo. These results indicate a sustained benefit of t-PA for such patients.

Media in This Article

Figure 2Kaplan–Meier Estimate of Survival after Stroke in the t-PA and Placebo Groups.
Figure 1Outcome at 12 Months, According to Treatment Group.
Article

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study conducted in two parts, both of which showed a significant benefit at three months for patients with acute ischemic stroke who received treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA).1 Despite their having a higher frequency of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, the patients treated with t-PA were at least 30 percent more likely than patients given placebo to have minimal or no disability at three months. Mortality at three months among t-PA–treated patients in the two parts of the study combined (17 percent) was not significantly lower than that of the placebo group (21 percent). It was not known, however, whether the benefit found at three months would be sustained over a longer follow-up period. We analyzed data on the outcomes at 6 and 12 months.

Methods

Patients with acute ischemic stroke who could be treated within three hours after the onset of symptoms and who had a measurable neurologic deficit according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)2 were eligible for the study. Randomization was stratified according to the time since onset of the stroke (about half the patients were enrolled within 90 minutes after the onset of symptoms of stroke and the remainder between 90 and 180 minutes thereafter) and the clinical center. The patients were followed for 12 months. Outcome data were systematically collected 24 hours and 3, 6, and 12 months after stroke. The stroke was classified as large-vessel occlusive, small-vessel occlusive, or cardioembolic solely on the basis of the clinical and diagnostic information available to the investigator at the time of randomization. The protocols for each part of the trial were approved by the human research committee at each site. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

Part 1 of the trial included 291 patients and was designed to test whether a greater proportion of patients treated with t-PA, as compared with those who received placebo, had early improvement, defined as complete resolution of the neurologic deficit or an improvement from base line of four or more points in the score on the NIHSS 24 hours after the onset of stroke. The primary hypothesis for part 2 of the trial, which included 333 patients, was that there would be a consistent and persuasive difference between the t-PA and placebo groups in terms of the proportion of patients with minimal or no neurologic deficit three months after stroke. Except for the difference in the primary hypotheses, the protocols for parts 1 and 2 were the same. The four outcome measures used in both parts of the study were the Barthel index, the modified Rankin scale, the Glasgow Outcome Scale, and the NIHSS. The NIHSS was not used in this long-term follow-up study, because the necessary data were not collected at 6 months and 12 months.

During the first 24 hours after randomization, patients were monitored closely in an intensive care setting. Blood pressure was managed according to an algorithm, and antithrombotic and antiplatelet agents were not allowed by the protocol.3 After this initial period, treatment was directed by the patient's physician and not dictated by the protocol.

Clinical investigators remained unaware of the results of part 1 until part 2 was completed and the data were analyzed. Although the outcome data at 6 and 12 months were prospectively collected in accordance with the protocol, these outcomes were not specified as secondary outcomes in the protocol. Thus the analyses presented here are considered post hoc and exploratory.

Certified nurse coordinators or study physicians telephoned the patients or their care givers to determine the vital status of the patients; their ability to perform daily activities (measured with the Barthel index)4; and the degree of functional disability (measured with the modified Rankin scale5 and the Glasgow Outcome Scale6). The evaluators were unaware of the treatment assignments when the 6- and 12-month outcomes were assessed, and the patients and their care givers were also unaware of the treatment assignments. Several studies have validated telephone assessment of the outcome of stroke.7-9 Data were also collected on the causes of death and serious medical events, including intracerebral hemorrhage and recurrent stroke.

A favorable outcome was defined as minimal or no disability, as measured by scores of 95 or 100 on the Barthel index (range of scores, 0 to 100), 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale (range of scores, 0 to 5), and 1 on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (range of scores, 1 to 5). Using an intention-to-treat analysis, we assigned the patients who died before the specified follow-up the most unfavorable scores for each of the outcome measures. Patients for whom data were missing on an outcome measure were given the most unfavorable score for that measure. To increase the ability of the study to detect differences in long-term outcomes, we combined data from parts 1 and 2, since the methods for both parts, including those used for recruitment, treatment, and follow-up, were identical.

In this study, as in the original study of this cohort, favorable outcomes were determined with the use of a global statistic (the Wald test) derived from a general linear model with logit-link function, computed with the use of generalized estimating equations.10 The global test incorporated simultaneously the proportion of patients with minimal or no disability on the Barthel index, the modified Rankin scale, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 and 12 months. If the global tests indicated a significant difference at the 0.05 level, a Mantel–Haenszel test was used to compare the scores of the patients treated with t-PA and those of the patients who received placebo for each of the three scales.11

To describe the treatment effects across the range of outcomes, outcomes were classified into one of four categories: minimal or no disability (score on Barthel index, 95 or 100; score on modified Rankin scale, 0 or 1; and score on Glasgow Outcome Scale, 1), moderate disability (Barthel index, 55 to 90; modified Rankin scale, 2 or 3; and Glasgow Outcome Scale, 2), severe disability (Barthel index, 0 to 50; modified Rankin scale, 4 or 5; and Glasgow Outcome Scale, 3 or 4), and death.

Log-rank tests were conducted to compare survival in the two groups 6 months and 12 months after the onset of stroke. The incidence of recurrent stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage was reported according to treatment group and time after randomization (≤3 months, >3 to 6 months, and >6 to 12 months).

The cause of death was determined independently by a panel of three investigators who were unaware of the patients' treatment assignments. The patients' files and pertinent computed tomographic (CT) scans were reviewed. The causes of death were classified into one of the following five categories: cerebrovascular cause, in which death was due to intracerebral hemorrhage, severe infarction, or extensive cerebral edema; cardiovascular cause, which included congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema, acute myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmia, and pulmonary embolism; infection, primarily aspiration pneumonia and sepsis; cancer; and other, if the cause of death could not be classified into one of the preceding categories. All discrepancies regarding classification among the investigators were adjudicated by the panel until a consensus was reached.

After the cause of death was determined, its relation to the index stroke was assessed according to whether it was definitely related, possibly related, or not related. Although all base-line CT scans had to show no evidence of intracerebral hemorrhage for a patient to be included in this study, subsequent CT scans could show intracerebral hemorrhage or infarction without evidence of hemorrhage. For all causes of death that were judged to be definitely related to the index stroke, the underlying pathophysiologic feature of the stroke deemed to have been related to the patient's death was categorized as intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral edema, or cerebral infarction. To allow comparisons between deaths due to severe or extensive ischemic infarction and those due to intracerebral hemorrhage, the categories of edema and infarction were combined. Deaths thought to be due to the severity of the index stroke could then be compared with deaths judged to be due to intracerebral hemorrhage.

Multivariable analyses were carried out to test the association of selected base-line variables, including the type of stroke, and favorable outcome at one year. Variables for inclusion in the models were selected with the use of procedures described previously.12 A multivariable model was also fitted to identify base-line variables associated with survival at one year with the use of Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis. An interaction with a P value of less than 0.1 was considered to indicate significance. Variables with a P value of less than 0.05 or interactions between variables with a P value of less than 0.1 were retained in the final model. The effect of treatment on outcome at 12 months was tested again, with adjustments for base-line covariates and interactions remaining in the final model.

Results

A total of 624 patients were randomly assigned to treatment. Only 15 of the surviving patients (2.4 percent of the original 624; 7 in the t-PA group and 8 in the placebo group) were not available for the 6-month follow-up assessment for all three outcome scales, and 26 (4.2 percent; 14 in the t-PA group and 12 in the placebo group) were unavailable for the follow-up assessment at 12 months for all three scales. According to the intention-to-treat analysis, these patients were considered to have an unfavorable outcome for each missing scale.

Like the data at 3 months, the 6-month and 12-month data showed that the patients treated with t-PA were more likely to have a favorable outcome than those who received placebo. The odds ratio for a favorable outcome at 6 months in the t-PA group as compared with the placebo group was 1.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 2.3) and at 12 months was 1.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 2.3) (Table 1Table 1Outcomes Six Months and One Year after the Onset of Stroke.). A similar pattern is evident in the results of the univariate tests for the Barthel index, the modified Rankin scale, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (Table 1). At 12 months, the range of the absolute increase in the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome was 11 to 13 percentage points, and the range of the relative increase in favorable outcome was 32 to 46 percent for the three outcome scales.

Figure 1Figure 1Outcome at 12 Months, According to Treatment Group. shows the outcomes at 12 months. The six-month data (not shown) were very similar. The greater proportion of patients in the t-PA group with a favorable outcome at 12 months, as compared with those in the placebo group, was not accompanied by an increase in severe disability or mortality. In addition, when we compared the outcomes at 3 months and 12 months, the rate of agreement in results for patients with respect to a favorable outcome was 88 percent on the Barthel index and 91 percent on the modified Rankin scale and the Glasgow Outcome Scale, suggesting the stability of these outcomes over the 12-month period.

In the t-PA group, there were 23 symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages during the first three months after the stroke, 20 of which occurred within the first 36 hours. Six of the 23 patients (26 percent) were alive at 12 months. In the placebo group, four symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages occurred within three months, two of which occurred within the first 36 hours after the stroke. One of these four patients was alive at 12 months. Between 3 months and 12 months two additional patients had symptomatic hemorrhages in the t-PA group, one of whom was alive at 12 months. In the placebo group, one additional patient had symptomatic hemorrhage between 3 months and 12 months; this patient did not survive.

Thirty-four of the 624 patients had symptomatic recurrent strokes by 12 months, including 2 patients with two recurrences. Twenty-four events occurred within 3 months after treatment (12 in the t-PA group, and 12 in the placebo group), 7 between 3 and 6 months (4 in the t-PA group, and 3 in the placebo group), and 3 between 6 months and 12 months (1 in the t-PA group and 2 in the placebo group). Of the 34 recurrent strokes, 2 (6 percent) were classified as small-vessel disease, 16 (47 percent) as cardioembolic, 9 (26 percent) as large-vessel disease, and 7 (21 percent) as of unknown cause. There was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent stroke between patients in the t-PA group and those in the placebo group (P=0.89 at 6 months, and P=0.96 at 12 months).

The mortality rate 6 months after stroke was not significantly lower in the t-PA group than in the placebo group (21 percent vs. 23 percent, P=0.31) or at 12 months (24 percent vs. 28 percent, P=0.29) (Figure 2Figure 2Kaplan–Meier Estimate of Survival after Stroke in the t-PA and Placebo Groups.).

The causes of death at one year are summarized in Table 2Table 2Primary Causes of Death at 12 Months.. For the three major categories (cerebrovascular cause, cardiovascular cause, and infection), there was no significant difference between the t-PA group and the placebo group (P=0.47). For the t-PA group, 47 percent of the deaths were judged to be definitely related to the index stroke, 21 percent possibly related, and 32 percent not related. For the placebo group, 41 percent of the deaths were considered to be definitely related to the index stroke, 26 percent possibly related, and 32 percent not related. Among the patients whose deaths were judged to be definitely related to the index stroke, a larger percentage of such patients died of intracerebral hemorrhage in the t-PA group than in the placebo group (28 percent vs. 6 percent); a greater majority of patients in the placebo group died of severe ischemic stroke (94 percent vs. 72 percent).

The base-line variables retained in the final 12-month multivariable model of favorable outcomes were the presence or absence of diabetes, age, NIHSS score, and the interaction of age and NIHSS score. Patients who were older, who had diabetes, or who had higher base-line NIHSS scores were less likely to have a favorable outcome at 12 months. The benefit of treatment with t-PA remained significant after adjustment for these variables. No interactions between treatment and base-line variables were detected. Table 3Table 3Association of Base-Line NIHSS Score with Outcome at 12 Months. shows the percentages of patients with favorable outcomes at 12 months according to base-line NIHSS score. In all but one subgroup (patients with NIHSS scores of more than 20 at base line, with use of only the Glasgow scale as the outcome measure), the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome was greater in the t-PA group than in the placebo group. As was the case for the three-month assessment, there was no interaction between the type of stroke at base line (i.e., small-vessel occlusive, large-vessel occlusive, or cardioembolic) and treatment. The base-line variables that were associated with survival at 12 months included age, NIHSS score, diabetes, and the interaction of diabetes and age. Patients who were younger, had lower NIHSS scores at base line, or did not have diabetes had a higher rate of survival than the other patients. As was true for the univariate analysis, after adjustment for these variables, no difference in survival between the t-PA and placebo groups could be detected (P=0.29).

Discussion

We previously reported that treatment with intravenous t-PA within three hours after the onset of symptoms of an acute ischemic stroke improved the clinical outcome at three months.1 We now report that the magnitude of this benefit was sustained at 6 months and 12 months. In addition, patients treated with t-PA were less likely to be severely disabled 12 months after the stroke. These findings indicate that the beneficial effect of t-PA is sustained and that the primary benefit of t-PA is seen early after treatment.

The rates of recurrent stroke were similar in the t-PA group and the placebo group during the 12 months of follow-up and were similar to those found in previous population-based studies of stroke.13-15 Although our patients were carefully selected, the similarity in the rates of recurrent stroke suggests that they may be representative of patients with ischemic stroke. The mortality rates were also similar between the two groups at 6 months (21 percent in the t-PA group and 23 percent in the placebo group) and at 12 months (24 percent and 28 percent, respectively).

In our earlier study we found that despite the increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage in patients treated with t-PA, there was no difference in overall mortality between those receiving t-PA and those receiving placebo. Our current results suggest that the explanation for this finding is that patients who die from causes related to the index stroke are likely to die regardless of whether intracerebral hemorrhage occurs. This explanation reflects the often fatal consequences of severe ischemic stroke even in the absence of intracerebral hemorrhage.16

The results of multivariable analyses of variables related to a favorable outcome at 12 months were similar to those reported at 3 months.12 The absence of diabetes and the interaction between younger age and lower base-line NIHSS score remained in both models. In addition, younger age and a lower NIHSS score at base line were independently associated with a favorable outcome at 12 months. The base-line variables of younger age, lower NIHSS score, absence of diabetes, and the interaction of the absence of diabetes and younger age were also predictors of survival at 12 months. However, none of these variables associated with a favorable outcome or survival interacted with treatment. Therefore, even though patients who are older, have diabetes, or have higher base-line NIHSS scores are less likely to have a favorable outcome or survive 12 months after a stroke, they should not be selected for treatment solely on the basis of these features.12 For example, it would be fallacious to select a single subgroup with a high NIHSS score from those listed in Table 3 and draw the conclusion that t-PA is not beneficial for that subgroup.17 The broader trend of benefit with t-PA treatment that was demonstrable among all subgroups makes a single isolated aberration within one category of a subgroup more likely to be a random occurrence related to the small size of the sample than a clinically meaningful biologic trend.

In addition, after adjusting for the other base-line variables, we could not detect an association between the type of stroke identified at base line and the outcome over the long term. The type of stroke at base line may not correspond to the type of stroke that is ultimately identified, as determined by a complete diagnostic workup. However, the constraints of a very narrow therapeutic window mandate that a determination of the type of stroke be made at the time of clinical presentation. With these limitations in mind, our findings support the conclusion that the selection of patients for treatment with t-PA cannot be based solely on the mechanism of stroke, as determined at base line on the basis of clinical impression.

Other large studies of thrombolysis for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke have shown either no benefit18-20 or equivocal benefit21 from intravenous streptokinase or t-PA and high rates of early mortality and intracerebral hemorrhage. Reasons for the disparity between the results of these studies and ours may include differences in the time from the onset of symptoms to the initiation of treatment (zero to three hours in our study as compared with zero to four or six hours in the other trials), the choice and dose of thrombolytic agent, and the concomitant use or nonuse of heparin or aspirin.22-24 In addition, we used a strict algorithm for the management of blood pressure after beginning treatment with t-PA. A more recent trial of intravenous t-PA given within six hours after the onset of symptoms, but whose protocol was otherwise similar to ours, failed to show a benefit for t-PA in the primary analysis.25 This finding further supports the recommendation that treatment of acute ischemic stroke with intravenous t-PA be limited to patients who can be treated within three hours after the onset of stroke.

The results of this long-term follow-up study have potential implications for public health. For example, for every 100 patients treated with t-PA according to the selection criteria and management guidelines of this study, at least 11 additional patients will have a favorable outcome during the subsequent year. In addition, a cost-effectiveness analysis has demonstrated net cost savings to the health care system and improved quality of life for patients treated with t-PA.26

In conclusion, patients who received t-PA within three hours after the onset of symptoms were more likely to have minimal or no disability 3, 6, and 12 months later. Similar results may be attainable in everyday practice if guidelines for treatment and management are followed closely.24,27

Supported by contracts (N01-NS-02382, N01-NS-02374, N01-NS-02377, N01-NS-02381, N01-NS-02379, N01-NS-02373, N01-NS-02376, N01-NS-02378, and N01-NS-02380) with the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

Drs. Kwiatkowski, Libman, Frankel, Morgenstern, Broderick, Lewandowski, and Levine have been members of a speakers' bureau sponsored by Genentech. Dr. Morgenstern has also served on a Genentech advisory panel.

Source Information

From the Departments of Emergency Medicine (T.G.K.) and Neurology (R.B.L.), Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, N.Y.; the Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (M.F.); the Department of Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (B.C.T.); the Department of Neurology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston (L.B.M.); the Departments of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology (M.L.) and Emergency Medicine (C.A.L.), Henry Ford Health Sciences Center, Detroit; the Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati (J.P.B.); the Division of Stroke and Trauma, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Md. (J.R.M.); the Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit (S.R.L.); and the Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla. (T.B.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Kwiatkowski at the Department of Emergency Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave., New Hyde Park, NY 11040, or at .

Other members of the study group are listed in the Appendix.

Appendix

The following persons and institutions participated in the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Stroke Study Group: Clinical Centers — University of Cincinnati (150 patients): T. Brott, J. Broderick, R. Kothari, M. O'Donoghue, W. Barsan, T. Tomsick, J. Spilker, R. Miller, and L. Sauerbeck; Affiliated sites: St. Elizabeth Hospital (South), J. Farrell, J. Kelly, T. Perkins, and R. Miller; University Hospital, T. McDonald; Bethesda North Hospital, M. Rorick and C. Hickey; St. Luke Hospital (East), J. Armitage and C. Perry; Providence Hospital, K. Thalinger and R. Rhude; Christ Hospital, J. Armitage and J. Schill; St. Luke Hospital (West), P.S. Becker, R.S. Heath, and D. Adams; Good Samaritan Hospital, R. Reed and M. Klei; St. Francis/St. George Hospital, A. Hughes and R. Rhude; Bethesda Oak Hospital, J. Anthony and D. Baudendistel; St. Elizabeth Hospital (North), C. Zadicoff and R. Miller; St. Luke Hospital–Kansas City, M. Rymer, I. Bettinger, and P. Laubinger; Jewish Hospital, M. Schmerler and G. Meirose; University of California, San Diego (146 patients): P. Lyden, K. Rapp, T. Babcock, P. Daum, D. Persona, M. Brody, C. Jackson, S. Lewis, J. Liss, Z. Mahdavi, J. Rothrock, T. Tom, R. Zweifler, J. Dunford, and J. Zivin; Affiliated sites: Sharp Memorial Hospital, R. Kobayashi, J. Kunin, J. Licht, R. Rowen, and D. Stein; Mercy Hospital, J. Grisolia and F. Martin; Scripps Memorial Hospital, E. Chaplin, N. Kaplitz, J. Nelson, A. Neuren, and D. Silver; Tri-City Medical Center, T. Chippendale, E. Diamond, M. Lobatz, D. Murphy, D. Rosenberg, T. Ruel, M. Sadoff, J. Schim, and J. Schleimer; Mercy General Hospital, Sacramento, R. Atkinson, D. Wentworth, R. Cummings, R. Frink, and P. Heublein; University of Texas Medical School, Houston (104 patients): J. Grotta, T. DeGraba, M. Fisher, A. Ramirez, S. Hanson, L. Morgenstern, C. Sills, W. Pasteur, F. Yatsu, K. Andrews, C. Villar-Cordova, P. Pepe, P. Bratina, L. Greenberg, S. Rozek, and K. Simmons; Affiliated sites: Houston Fire Department Emergency Medical Services; Hermann Hospital, St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Lyndon Baines Johnson General Hospital, Memorial Northwest Hospital, Memorial Southwest Hospital, Heights Hospital, Park Plaza Hospital, and Twelve Oaks Hospital; Long Island Jewish Medical Center (72 patients): T. Kwiatkowski, S. Horowitz, R. Libman, R. Kanner, R. Silverman, J. LaMantia, C. Mealie, R. Duarte, R. Donnarumma, M. Okola, V. Cullen, and E. Mitchell; Henry Ford Hospital (62 patients): S. Levine, C. Lewandowski, G. Tokarski, N. Ramadan, P. Mitsias, M. Gorman, B. Zarowitz, J. Kokkinos, J. Dayno, P. Verro, C. Gymnopoulos, R. Dafer, L. D'Olhaberriague, K. Sawaya, S. Daley, and M. Mitchell; Emory University School of Medicine (39 patients): M. Frankel, B. Mackay, C. Barch, J. Braimah, B. Flaherty, J. MacDonald, S. Sailor, A. Cook, H. Karp, B. Nguyen, J. Washington, J. Weissman, M. Williams, and T. Williamson; Affiliated sites: Grady Memorial Hospital, Crawford Long Hospital, Emory University Hospital, South Fulton Hospital, M. Kozinn and L. Hellwick; University of Virginia Health Sciences Center (37 patients): E. Haley, Jr., T. Bleck, W. Cail, G. Lindbeck, M. Granner, S. Wolf, M. Gwynn, R. Mettetal, Jr., C. Chang, N. Solenski, D. Brock, G. Ford, G. Kongable, K. Parks, S. Wilkinson, and M. Davis; Affiliated site: Winchester Medical Center, G. Sheppard, D. Zontine, K. Gustin, N. Crowe, and S. Massey; University of Tennessee (14 patients): M. Meyer, K. Gaines, A. Payne, C. Bales, J. Malcolm, R. Barlow, and M. Wilson; Affiliated sites: Baptist Memorial Hospital, C. Cape; Methodist Hospital Central, T. Bertorini; Jackson Madison County General Hospital, K. Misulis; University of Tennessee Medical Center, W. Paulsen and D. Shepard; Coordinating Center — Henry Ford Health Sciences Center: B. Tilley, K. Welch, S. Fagan, M. Lu, S. Patel, S. Li, J. Verter, J. Boura, J. Main, L. Gordon, N. Maddy, and T. Chociemski; Computed tomography reading centers: Part 1 — Henry Ford Health Sciences Center, J. Windham and H. Soltanian Zadeh; Part 2 — University of Virginia Medical Center, W. Alves, M. Keller, and J. Wenzel; Central Laboratory: Henry Ford Hospital, N. Raman and L. Cantwell; Drug Distribution Center: A. Warren, K. Smith, and E. Bailey; Committees — Executive: K. Welch, B. Tilley, and J. Marler; Steering: K. Welch, T. Brott, P. Lyden, J. Grotta, T. Kwiatkowski, S. Levine, M. Frankel, E. Haley, Jr., M. Meyer, B. Tilley, and J. Marler; Participants from Genentech: J. Froehlich and J. Breed; Data and Safety Monitoring Committee: J. Easton, J. Hallenbeck, G. Lan, J. Marsh, and M. Walker; Project Office — NINDS: J. Marler.

References

References

  1. 1

    The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581-1587
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, et al. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. Stroke 1994;25:2220-2226
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rt-PA Stroke Study Group. A systems approach to immediate evaluation and management of hyperacute stroke: experience at eight centers and implications for community practice and patient care. Stroke 1997;28:1530-1540
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md Med J 1965;14:61-65

  5. 5

    van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJA, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604-607
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Teasdale G, Knill-Jones R, van der Sande J. Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41:603-610
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Shinar D, Gross CR, Bronstein KS, et al. Reliability of the activities of daily living scale and its use in telephone interview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:723-728
    Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Siemiatycki J, Shapiro S, Becker R. Health-related information postdischarge: telephone versus face-to-face interviewing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1287-1296
    Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Candelise L, Pinard G, Aritzu E, Musicco M. Telephone interview for stroke outcome assessment. Cerebrovasc Dis 1994;4:341-343
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  10. 10

    Tilley BC, Marler J, Geller NL, et al. Use of a global test for multiple outcomes in stroke trials with application to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke t-PA Stroke Trial. Stroke 1996;27:2136-2142
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719-748
    Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Generalized efficacy of t-PA for acute stroke: subgroup analysis of the NINDS t-PA Stroke Trial. Stroke 1997;28:2119-2125
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Sacco RL, Shi T, Zamanillo MC, Kargman DE. Predictors of mortality and recurrence after hospital cerebral infarction in an urban community: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Neurology 1994;44:626-634
    Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Sacco SE, Whisnant JP, Broderick JP, Phillips SJ, O'Fallon WM. Epidemiological characteristics of lacunar infarcts in a population. Stroke 1991;22:1236-1241
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Sacco RL, Wolf PA, Kannel WB, McNamara PM. Survival and recurrence following stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 1982;13:290-295
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R. `Malignant' middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol 1996;53:309-315
    Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Yusuf S, Wittes J, Probstfield J, Tyroler H. Analysis and interpretations of treatment effects in subgroups of patients in randomized clinical trials. JAMA 1991;266:93-98
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Multicentre Acute Stroke Trial -- Italy (MAST-I) Group. Randomised controlled trial of streptokinase, aspirin, and combination of both in treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet 1995;346:1509-1514
    Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    The Multicenter Acute Stroke Trial -- European Study Group. Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1996;335:145-150
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Donnan GA, Davis SM, Chambers BR, et al. Streptokinase for acute ischemic stroke with relationship to time of administration. JAMA 1996;276:961-966
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke: the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study. JAMA 1995;274:1017-1025
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Frankel MR. Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1997;336:65-65
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke: summary statement: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1996;47:835-839
    Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Adams HP Jr, Brott TG, Furlan AJ, et al. Guidelines for thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke: a supplement to the guidelines for the management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 1996;27:1711-1718
    Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, et al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Lancet 1998;352:1245-1251
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Fagan SC, Morgenstern LB, Petitta A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 1998;50:883-890
    Web of Science | Medline

  27. 27

    Chiu D, Krieger D, Villar-Cordova C, et al. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke: feasibility, safety, and efficacy in the first year of clinical practice. Stroke 1998;29:18-22
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (136)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    H. Losoi, J. E. Kettunen, M. Laihosalo, E.-I. Ruuskanen, P. Dastidar, A.-M. Koivisto, M. Jehkonen. (2011) Predictors of functional outcome after right hemisphere stroke in patients with or without thrombolytic treatment. Neurocase1-9
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    N. E. Mayo, S. Scott. (2011) Evaluating a complex intervention with a single outcome may not be a good idea: an example from a randomised trial of stroke case management. Age and Ageing 40:6, 718-724
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    F. López Espuela, M.A. Jiménez Gracia, E. Luengo Morales, A. Blanco Gazapo, J. Márquez Caballero, S. Bravo Fernández, J.C. Portilla Cuenca. (2011) Estudio descriptivo de los pacientes asistidos en una unidad de ictus en la Comunidad de Extremadura. Enfermería Intensiva 22:4, 138-143
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    (2011) Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine 365:10, 964-967
    Full Text

  5. 5

    Alexandros L. Georgiadis, Steve M. Cordina, Gabriela Vazquez, Nauman Tariq, M. Fareed K. Suri, Kamakshi Lakshminarayan, Harold P. Adams, Adnan I. Qureshi. (2011) Aspirin Treatment Failure and the Risk of Recurrent Stroke and Death Among Patients with Ischemic Stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Christopher W. Jones, Timothy F. Platts-Mills. (2011) Understanding Commonly Encountered Limitations in Clinical Research: An Emergency Medicine Resident's Perspective. Annals of Emergency Medicine
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Muneer Eesa, Hermann Christian Schumacher, Randall T Higashida, Philip M Meyers. (2011) Advances in revascularization for acute ischemic stroke treatment: an update. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 11:8, 1125-1139
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Andrew D. Barreto. (2011) Intravenous Thrombolytics for Ischemic Stroke. Neurotherapeutics 8:3, 388-399
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Keita Shibata, Terumasa Hashimoto, Koji Nobe, Keiji Hasumi, Kazuo Honda. (2011) Neuroprotective mechanisms of SMTP-7 in cerebral infarction model in mice. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology 384:1, 103-108
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Wechsler, Lawrence R., . (2011) Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine 364:22, 2138-2146
    Full Text

  11. 11

    N. Venketasubramanian, K. H. Pwee, C. P. L. Chen, . (2011) Singapore ministry of health clinical practice guidelines on stroke and transient ischemic attacks. International Journal of Stroke 6:3, 251-258
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Wuwei Feng, Gabriela Vasquez, M. Fareed K. Suri, Kamakshi Lakshminarayan, Adnan I. Qureshi. (2011) Repeated-Measures Analysis of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Trial. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 20:3, 241-246
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Holli A. DeVon, Karen L. Saban, Donna K. Garrett. (2011) Recognizing and Responding to Symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndromes and Stroke in Women. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing 40:3, 372-382
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    James T. Devries, Christopher J. White. 2011. How to Develop a Stroke Program. , 385-391.
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    C.-A. Taschner, M. Treier, M. Schumacher, A. Berlis, J. Weber, W. Niesen. (2011) Mechanical thrombectomy with the Penumbra recanalization device in acute ischemic stroke. Journal of Neuroradiology 38:1, 47-52
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Kyung-Mo Ku, Ki-Bong Song, Mi-Sun Oh, Kyung-Ho Yu, Ju-Hun Lee, Joon-Hyun Shin, Soo-Jin Cho, Sung-Hee Hwang, San Jung, Hui-Chul Choi, Chul-Ho Kim, Byung-Chul Lee. (2011) Clinical Characteristics of Acute Ischemic Stroke while Sleep and Awake. Korean Journal of Stroke 13:2, 74
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Wendy Brown, Lama Al-Khoury, Gilda Tafreshi, Patrick D. Lyden. 2011. Intravenous Thrombolysis. , 945-970.
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Barbara C. Tilley, Yuko Y. Palesch. 2011. Conduct of Stroke-Related Clinical Trials. , 1192-1203.
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Phillip A. Scott, Shirley M. Frederiksen, John D. Kalbfleisch, Zhenzhen Xu, William J. Meurer, Angela F. Caveney, Annette Sandretto, Ann B. Holden, Mary N. Haan, Ellen G. Hoeffner, Sameer A. Ansari, David P. Lambert, Michael Jaggi, William G. Barsan, Robert Silbergleit. (2010) Safety of Intravenous Thrombolytic Use in Four Emergency Departments Without Acute Stroke Teams. Academic Emergency Medicine 17:10, 1062-1071
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Giorgio Battista Boncoraglio, Anna Bersano, Livia Candelise, Brent A Reynolds, Eugenio A Parati, Giorgio Battista Boncoraglio. 2010. Stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke. .
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Margaret C. Fang, David M. Cutler, Allison B. Rosen. (2010) Trends in thrombolytic use for ischemic stroke in the United States. Journal of Hospital Medicine 5:7, 406-409
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Mark Abelson, Johan Roos. (2010) Mechanical embolectomy for large vessel ischemic strokes: A cardiologist's experience. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 76:3, 309-315
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Chantal Guilhaume, Delphine Saragoussi, John Cochran, Clément François, Mondher Toumi. (2010) Modeling stroke management: a qualitative review of cost-effectiveness analyses. The European Journal of Health Economics 11:4, 419-426
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Zeev Meiner, Anna Sajin, Isabella Schwartz, Jeanna Tsenter, Ivelin Yovchev, Roni Eichel, Tamir Ben-Hur, Ronen R. Leker. (2010) Rehabilitation Outcomes of Stroke Patients Treated With Tissue Plasminogen Activator. PM&R 2:8, 698-702
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Gert Kwakkel, Janne M. Veerbeek, Erwin E.H. van Wegen, Rinske Nijland, Barbara C. Harmeling-van der Wel, Diederik W.J. Dippel. (2010) Predictive value of the NIHSS for ADL outcome after ischemic hemispheric stroke: Does timing of early assessment matter?. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 294:1-2, 57-61
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Ruo-Li Chen, Joyce S. Balami, Margaret M. Esiri, Liang-Kung Chen, Alastair M. Buchan. (2010) Ischemic stroke in the elderly: an overview of evidence. Nature Reviews Neurology 6:5, 256-265
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Ameer E. Hassan, Bahareh Hassanzadeh, Vahid Tohidi, Jawad F. Kirmani. (2010) Very Mild Stroke Patients Benefit from Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator Without Increase of Intracranial Hemorrhage. Southern Medical Journal 103:5, 398-402
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Melissa Johnson, Tamilyn Bakas. (2010) A Review of Barriers to Thrombolytic Therapy. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 42:2, 88-94
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Ameer E. Hassan, Haralabos Zacharatos, Bahareh Hassanzadeh, Ahmed El-Gengaihy, Ammar AlKawi, Akram Shhadeh, Jawad F. Kirmani. (2010) Does Mild Deficit for Patients with Stroke Justify the Use of Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator?. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 19:2, 116-120
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    C. Crawford Mechem, Jeffrey M. Goodloe, Neal J. Richmond, Bradley J. Kaufman, Paul E. Pepe. (2010) Resuscitation Center Designation: Recommendations for Emergency Medical Services Practices. Prehospital Emergency Care 14:1, 51-61
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Javier Mar, Arantzazu Arrospide, Mercè Comas. (2010) Budget Impact Analysis of Thrombolysis for Stroke in Spain: A Discrete Event Simulation Model. Value in Health 13:1, 69-76
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Terumasa Hashimoto, Keita Shibata, Koji Nobe, Keiji Hasumi, Kazuo Honda. (2010) A Novel Embolic Model of Cerebral Infarction and Evaluation of Stachybotrys microspora Triprenyl Phenol-7 (SMTP-7), a Novel Fungal Triprenyl Phenol Metabolite. Journal of Pharmacological Sciences 114:1, 41-49
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Patrick D Lyden. (2009) Extending the time window for thrombolytic therapy—primum non tardare. The Lancet Neurology 8:12, 1074-1075
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Jaechan Park, Yang-Ha Hwang, Yongsun Kim. (2009) EXTENDED SUPERCILIARY APPROACH FOR MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY EMBOLECTOMY AFTER UNSUCCESSFUL ENDOVASCULAR RECANALIZATION THERAPY. Neurosurgery 65:6, E1191-E1194
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Joanna M Wardlaw, Veronica Murray, Eivind Berge, Gregory J del Zoppo, Joanna M Wardlaw. 2009. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. .
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Chen Xu Wang, Xiuqing Ding, Raza Noor, Christina Pegg, Chunyan He, Ashfaq Shuaib. (2009) Rosiglitazone alone or in combination with tissue plasminogen activator improves ischemic brain injury in an embolic model in rats. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 29:10, 1683-1694
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Peng Huang, Christopher G. Goetz, Robert F. Woolson, Barbara Tilley, Douglas Kerr, Yuko Palesch, Jordan Elm, Bernard Ravina, Kenneth J. Bergmann, Karl Kieburtz. (2009) Using global statistical tests in long-term Parkinson's disease clinical trials. Movement Disorders 24:12, 1732-1739
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Jonathan Birns, Lalit Kalra. (2009) Thrombolytic therapy for stroke. Therapy 6:5, 733-745
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Pamela Sun, Jianteng Gu, Mervyn Maze, Daqing Ma. (2009) Is xenon a future neuroprotectant?. Future Neurology 4:4, 483-492
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Justin A. Zivin. (2009) Acute stroke therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) since it was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Annals of Neurology 66:1, 6-10
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Catherine Amlie-Lefond, Gabrielle deVeber, Anthony K Chan, Susan Benedict, Timothy Bernard, Jessica Carpenter, Michael M Dowling, Heather Fullerton, Collin Hovinga, Adam Kirton, Warren Lo, Khaled Zamel, Rebecca Ichord. (2009) Use of alteplase in childhood arterial ischaemic stroke: a multicentre, observational, cohort study. The Lancet Neurology 8:6, 530-536
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Gregory J. del Zoppo. 2009. Acute Thrombolysis in Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease. , 617-650.
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    James T. DeVries, Christopher J. White, Tyrone J. Collins, J. Stephen Jenkins, John P. Reilly, Mark A. Grise, Paul W. McMullan, Ramy A. Badawi, Stephen R. Ramee. (2009) Acute stroke intervention by interventional cardiologists. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 73:5, 692-698
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Reza Jahan, Fernando Vinuela. (2009) Treatment of acute ischemic stroke: intravenous and endovascular therapies. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 7:4, 375-387
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Phillip A. Scott. (2009) Enhancing Community Delivery of Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Stroke Through Community–Academic Collaborative Clinical Knowledge Translation. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 27:1, 115-136
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    RAJAN A.G. PATEL, TYRONE J. COLLINS. (2009) Techniques for Acute Stroke Intervention. Journal of Interventional Cardiology 22:1, 1-8
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Shinichi Harada, Wakako Hamabe, Kohei Kamiya, Toshiko Satake, Junichiro Yamamoto, Shogo Tokuyama. (2009) Preventive Effect of Morinda citrifolia Fruit Juice on Neuronal Damage Induced by Focal Ischemia. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 32:3, 405-409
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Sung-Il Sohn, A-Hyun Cho. (2009) Thrombolytic Treatment of Acute Stroke. Journal of the Korean Medical Association 52:4, 340
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Pedro Navarrete Navarro, Francisca Pino Sánchez, Rafael Rodríguez Romero, Francisco Murillo Cabezas, M. Dolores Jiménez Hernández. (2008) Neurointensivismo Manejo inicial del ictus isquémico agudo. Medicina Intensiva 32:9, 431-443
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Lars-Olof Hattenbach, Claudia Kuhli-Hattenbach, Inge Scharrer, Holger Baatz. (2008) Intravenous Thrombolysis With Low-dose Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion. American Journal of Ophthalmology 146:5, 700-706.e1
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    James T. DeVries, Christopher J. White, Michael C. Cunningham, Steven R. Ramee. (2008) Catheter-based therapy for acute ischemic stroke: A national unmet need. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 72:5, 705-709
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Chen Xu Wang, Xiuqing Ding, Ashfaq Shuaib. (2008) Treatment with melagatran alone or in combination with thrombolytic therapy reduced ischemic brain injury. Experimental Neurology 213:1, 171-175
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Giorgio Battista Boncoraglio, Anna Bersano, Livia Candelise, Brent A Reynolds, Eugenio A Parati, Giorgio Battista Boncoraglio. 2008. Stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke. .
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Emmanuelle Grillon, Peggy Provent, Olivier Montigon, Christoph Segebarth, Chantal Rémy, Emmanuel L. Barbier. (2008) Blood–brain barrier permeability to manganese and to Gd-DOTA in a rat model of transient cerebral ischaemia. NMR in Biomedicine 21:5, 427-436
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Titto T. Idicula, Ulrike Waje-Andreassen, Jan Brogger, Halvor Naess, Maria Therese Lundstadsveen, Lars Thomassen. (2008) The Effect of Physiologic Derangement in Patients with Stroke Treated with Thrombolysis. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 17:3, 141-146
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Barbara Theresia Weis-Müller, Rita Huber, Asya Spivak-Dats, Bernd Turowski, Mario Siebler, Wilhelm Sandmann. (2008) Symptomatic acute occlusion of the internal carotid artery: Reappraisal of urgent vascular reconstruction based on current stroke imaging. Journal of Vascular Surgery 47:4, 752-759
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Geoffrey S. F. Ling. (2008) Aggressive management of ischemic stroke: The case for the hospitalist. Journal of Hospital Medicine 3:S2, S9-S14
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Terence J Quinn, Jesse Dawson, Kennedy R Lees. (2008) Past, present and future of alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 8:2, 181-192
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Urban Safwenberg, Andreas Terént, Lars Lind. (2007) The Emergency Department presenting complaint as predictor of in-hospital fatality. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 14:6, 324-331
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    B.T. Weis-Müller, R. Huber, A. Spivak-Dats, B. Turowski, R. Seitz, M. Siebler, W. Sandmann. (2007) Stellenwert der Revaskularisation eines akuten Karotisverschlusses. Der Chirurg 78:11, 1041-1048
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    James Grotta, John Marler. (2007) Intravenous rt-PA: a tenth anniversary reflection. Surgical Neurology 68, S12-S16
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Jaishri O. Blakeley, Rafael H. Llinas. (2007) Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 261:1-2, 55-62
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    D. Seidenwurm, P. Turski, J. Barr, J. Connors, M. Lev, S. Mukherji, E. Russell. (2007) Performance Measures in Neuroradiology. American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:8, 1435-1438
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Can-xiang Cao, Qing-wu Yang, Feng-lin Lv, Jie Cui, Hua-bin Fu, Jing-zhou Wang. (2007) Reduced cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in Toll-like receptor 4 deficient mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 353:2, 509-514
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    James Kennedy, Alastair M. Buchan. (2007) Moving forward with intra-arterial and intravenous stroke treatment. International Journal of Stroke 2:1, 45-46
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Douglas Dulli, Edgar A. Samaniego. (2007) Inpatient and Community Ischemic Strokes in a University Hospital. Neuroepidemiology 28:2, 86-92
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Aslam M Khaja, James C Grotta. (2007) Established treatments for acute ischaemic stroke. The Lancet 369:9558, 319-330
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Masahito Hitosugi, Kazunobu Omura, Tetsuo Yufu, Masahito Kido, Munehiro Niwa, Toshiaki Nagai, Shogo Tokudome. (2007) Changes in blood viscosity with the recombinant tissue plasminogen activator alteplase. Thrombosis Research 120:3, 447-450
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    David Fussell, H. Christian Schumacher, Philip M. Meyers, Randall T. Higashida. (2007) Mechanical interventions to treat acute stroke. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 7:1, 21-27
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    William E Dager, Cynthia A Sanoski, Barbara S Wiggins, James E Tisdale. (2006) Pharmacotherapy Considerations in Advanced Cardiac Life Support. Pharmacotherapy 26:12, 1703-1729
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Cabot, Richard C.Harris, Nancy Lee, Shepard, Jo-Anne O., Ebeling, Sally H.Peters, Christine C., Thomas, Stephen H., Schwamm, Lee H., Lev, Michael H., . (2006) Case 16-2006. New England Journal of Medicine 354:21, 2263-2271
    Full Text

  72. 72

    Nicole R Gonzales, James C Grotta. (2006) Alteplase for acute ischemic stroke. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 4:3, 301-318
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Ralph Weber, Pedro Ramos-Cabrer, Mathias Hoehn. (2006) Present status of Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in animal stroke models. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 26:5, 591-604
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    J. Somerfield, P. A. Barber, N. E. Anderson, D. Spriggs, A. Charleston, P. Bennett. (2006) Changing attitudes to the management of ischaemic stroke between 1997 and 2004: a survey of New Zealand physicians. Internal Medicine Journal 36:5, 276-280
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Sid Gilman. (2006) Pharmacologic management of ischemic stroke: Relevance to stem cell therapy. Experimental Neurology 199:1, 28-36
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Edward Grayden. 2006. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. .
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    G. M. S. Nys, M. J. E. Zandvoort, A. Algra, L. J. Kappelle, E. H. F. Haan. (2006) Cognitive and functional outcome after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment in patients with a first symptomatic brain infarct. Journal of Neurology 253:2, 237-241
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    P FLYNN. (2006) Acute stroke treatment; who is going to bleed?. Clinical Radiology 61:2, 154-155
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Joshua Willey, H Christian Schumacher, Philip M Meyers. (2006) Future directions for recanalization therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Future Neurology 1:1, 107-116
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Jing Xiao, Zhenhong Nan, Yasuhiko Motooka, Walter C. Low. (2005) Transplantation of a Novel Cell Line Population of Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cells Ameliorates Neurological Deficits Associated with Ischemic Brain Injury. Stem Cells and Development 14:6, 722-733
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    Azlisham Mohd Nor, John Davis, Bas Sen, Dean Shipsey, Stephen J Louw, Alexander G Dyker, Michelle Davis, Gary A Ford. (2005) The Recognition of Stroke in the Emergency Room (ROSIER) scale: development and validation of a stroke recognition instrument. The Lancet Neurology 4:11, 727-734
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Rüdiger J. Seitz, Stefanie Meisel, Marek Moll, Hans-Jörg Wittsack, Ulrich Junghans, Mario Siebler. (2005) Partial rescue of the perfusion deficit area by thrombolysis. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 22:2, 199-205
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Roland M. H. Schein, Andrew A. Quartin. (2005) Acute respiratory distress syndrome and long-term outcomes: What should we follow?*. Critical Care Medicine 33:7, 1656-1658
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Robert Silbergleit, Phillip A. Scott. (2005) Thrombolysis for Acute Stroke: The Incontrovertible, the Controvertible, and the Uncertain. Academic Emergency Medicine 12:4, 348-351
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    H Christian Schumacher, Rishi Gupta, Randall T Higashida, Philip M Meyers. (2005) Advances in revascularization for acute ischemic stroke treatment. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 5:2, 189-201
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Kazuo MINEMATSU. (2005) EBM and Current State in Japan of Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Internal Medicine 44:4, 369-371
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Javier Mar, Jose Maria Begiristain, Arantza Arrazola. (2005) Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Thrombolytic Treatment for Stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 20:3, 193-200
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Lars Thomassen, Ulrike Waje-Andreassen, Halvor Naess, May-Karin Elvik, David Russell. (2005) Long-Term Effect of Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Stroke: Responder Analysis versus Uniform Analysis of Excellent Outcome. Cerebrovascular Diseases 20:6, 470-474
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    J.-F. Spieler, P. Amarenco. (2004) Aspects socio-économiques de la prise en charge de l’attaque cérébrale. Revue Neurologique 160:11, 1023-1028
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Kathleen M Burger, Stanley Tuhrim. (2004) Antithrombotic trials in acute ischaemic stroke: a selective review. Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs 9:2, 303-312
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Nathalie Lebeurrier, Denis Vivien, Carine Ali. (2004) The complexity of tissue-type plasminogen activator: can serine protease inhibitors help in stroke management?. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 8:4, 309-320
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    M AHMED. (2004) Imaging of acute stroke: State of the art. Seminars in Vascular Surgery 17:2, 181-205
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    Masao HIWATARI. (2004) Current Topics on Cerebrovascular Disease. Rigakuryoho Kagaku 19:1, 27-30
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    Edward D. Hall, Joe E. Springer. (2004) Neuroprotection and acute spinal cord injury: A reappraisal. NeuroRX 1:1, 80
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    G.J.R. Luijckx, J. Schuling. (2004) De trombolytische behandeling van het acute herseninfarctalteplase transient ischemic attack (TIA) herseninfarct neurologische uitvalsverschijnselen. Bijblijven 20:1, 25-33
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    Lama Al-Khoury, Patrick D. Lyden. 2004. Intravenous Thrombolysis. , 919-941.
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    Edward D. Hall, Joe E. Springer. (2004) Neuroprotection and acute spinal cord injury: A reappraisal. NeuroRX 1:1, 80-100
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    Giuseppe Carbutti, Jacques-Andr?? Romand, Jean-S??bastien Carballo, Si-M???hamed Bendjelid, Peter M. Suter, Karim Bendjelid. (2003) Transcranial Doppler: An Early Predictor of Ischemic Stroke After Cardiac Arrest?. Anesthesia & Analgesia1262-1265
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Joanna M Wardlaw, Gregory J del Zoppo, Takenori Yamaguchi, Eivind Berge, Joanna M Wardlaw. 2003. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. .
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    Curtis Benesch. (2003) Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 5:4, 267-275
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    JESSE WEINBERGER, WILLIAM H. FRISHMAN, DAWN TERASHITA. (2003) Drug Therapy of Neurovascular Disease. Cardiology in Review 11:3, 122-146
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    Ryan S. Senger, M. Nazmul Karim. (2003) Effect of Shear Stress on Intrinsic CHO Culture State and Glycosylation of Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Protein. Biotechnology Progress 19:4, 1199-1209
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    Geoffrey A Donnan, David W Howells, Romesh Markus, Danilo Toni, Stephen M Davis. (2003) Can the Time Window for Administration of Thrombolytics in Stroke be Increased?. CNS Drugs 17:14, 995-1011
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    Bo Skaaning Jensen. (2002) BMS-204352: A Potassium Channel Opener Developed for the Treatment of Stroke. CNS Drug Reviews 8:4, 353-360
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    Katayoun Vahedi, Marie-Germaine Bousser. (2002) Thrombolysis in stroke. Current Opinion in Hematology 9:5, 443-447
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    Keiji Yamaguchi, Shingo Hori, Shigeru Nogawa, Norio Tanahashi, Yasuo Fukuuchi, Naoki Aikawa. (2002) Thrombolysis Candidates for the Treatment of Stroke at an Emergency Department in Japan. Academic Emergency Medicine 9:7, 754-758
    CrossRef

  107. 107

    J. F. Meschia, D. A. Miller, T. G. Brott. (2002) Thrombolytic Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 77:6, 542-551
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    Hans-Christian Koennecke. (2002) Systemic thrombolytic therapy of acute ischemic stroke with rtPA. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2:2, 187-201
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    Donald P. Younkin. (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of ischemic pediatric stroke. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 2:1, 18-24
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    Mohr, J.P., Thompson, J.L.P., Lazar, R.M., Levin, B., Sacco, R.L., Furie, K.L., Kistler, J.P., Albers, G.W., Pettigrew, L.C., Adams, H.P. Jr., Jackson, C.M., Pullicino, P., . (2001) A Comparison of Warfarin and Aspirin for the Prevention of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine 345:20, 1444-1451
    Full Text

  111. 111

    Sheila A Doggrell. (2001) Alteplase: descendancy in myocardial infarction, ascendancy in stroke. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 10:11, 2013-2029
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    S. Love, R. Barber. (2001) Expression of P-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in human brain after focal infarction or cardiac arrest. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 27:6, 465-473
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    Peter D. Schellinger, Jochen B. Fiebach, Alexander Mohr, Peter A. Ringleb, Olav Jansen, Werner Hacke. (2001) Thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke—A review. Part II—Intra-arterial thrombolysis, vertebrobasilar stroke, phase IV trials, and stroke imaging. Critical Care Medicine 29:9, 1819-1825
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    M. Grond. (2001) Clinical Thrombolysis in Stroke. Thrombosis Research 103, S135-S142
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    Chen Xu Wang, Tao Yang, Ashfaq Shuaib. (2001) An improved version of embolic model of brain ischemic injury in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 109:2, 147-151
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    Sean C. Orr, Camilo R. Gomez. (2001) Controversies about tissue plasminogen activator: Extending the window of therapy. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 3:4, 313-320
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    Larry B. Goldstein. (2001) Medical therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 3:4, 299-306
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    C Wang. (2001) A focal embolic model of cerebral ischemia in rats: introduction and evaluation. Brain Research Protocols 7:2, 115-120
    CrossRef

  119. 119

    Jonathan Rosand, Lee H Schwamm. (2001) Management of Brain Edema Complicating Stroke. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 16:3, 128-141
    CrossRef

  120. 120

    Douglas Chyatte, Rebecca Porterfield. (2001) Functional outcome after repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Journal of Neurosurgery 94:3, 417-421
    CrossRef

  121. 121

    Michael P. Flavin, Gang Zhao. (2001) Tissue plasminogen activator protects hippocampal neurons from oxygen-glucose deprivation injury. Journal of Neuroscience Research 63:5, 388-394
    CrossRef

  122. 122

    James F. Meschia, Thomas G. Brott. (2001) New insights on thrombolytic treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 1:1, 19-25
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    Frank Pillekamp, Matthias Grüne, Gerrit Brinker, Claudia Franke, Ulla Uhlenküken, Mathias Hoehn, Konstantin-Alexander Hossmann. (2001) Magnetic resonance prediction of outcome after thrombolytic treatment. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 19:2, 143-152
    CrossRef

  124. 124

    Douglas Chyatte, Rebecca Porterfield. (2001) Nuances of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm Microsurgery. Neurosurgery 48:2, 339-346
    CrossRef

  125. 125

    Shannon E. Sinclair, Luciana Frighetto, Peter S. Loewen, Rubina Sunderji, Philip Teal, Susan C. Fagan, Carlo A. Marra. (2001) Cost-Utility Analysis of Tissue Plasminogen Activator Therapy for Acute Ischaemic Stroke. PharmacoEconomics 19:9, 927-936
    CrossRef

  126. 126

    Louise D McCullough, N.B Beauchamp, Robert Wityk. (2001) Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Stroke. Survey of Ophthalmology 45:4, 317-330
    CrossRef

  127. 127

    David Tanne, Deborah Turgeman, Yehuda Adler. (2001) Management of Acute Ischaemic Stroke in the Elderly. Drugs 61:10, 1439-1453
    CrossRef

  128. 128

    Wood, Alastair J.J., , Brott, Thomas, Bogousslavsky, Julien, . (2000) Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine 343:10, 710-722
    Full Text

  129. 129

    (2000) Part 3: Adult Basic Life Support. Resuscitation 46:1-3, 29-71
    CrossRef

  130. 130

    Yuan Xu, Jerry Cacia. (2000) A REVERSED-PHASE HPLC ASSAY FOR PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATORS. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies 23:12, 1841-1850
    CrossRef

  131. 131

    Dean D. Kindler, George A. Lopez, Bradford B. Worrall, Karen C. Johnston. (2000) Update on therapies for acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgical FOCUS 8:5, 1-5
    CrossRef

  132. 132

    Shah-Hinan Ahmed, Arif Y. Shaikh, Zaib Y. Shaikh, Chung Y. Hsu. (2000) What animal models have taught us about the treatment of acute stroke and brain protection. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 2:2, 167-180
    CrossRef

  133. 133

    Sophia Sundararajan, Lewis B. Morgenstern. (2000) Thrombolysis for acute stroke: Is it for everyone?. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 2:2, 97-103
    CrossRef

  134. 134

    Mark P Mattson. (2000) Prostate apoptosis response-4 (Par-4): an emerging target for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases and stroke. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 4:1, 51-63
    CrossRef

  135. 135

    Patrick D. Lyden. (1999) Thrombolysis for acute stroke. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 42:3, 175-183
    CrossRef

  136. 136

    (1999) Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke. New England Journal of Medicine 341:16, 1240-1241
    Full Text

Letters