Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

The Prevalence of Cardiac Valvular Insufficiency Assessed by Transthoracic Echocardiography in Obese Patients Treated with Appetite-Suppressant Drugs

Mehmood A. Khan, M.D., Charles A. Herzog, M.D., John V. St. Peter, Pharm.D., Guilford G. Hartley, M.D., Richard Madlon-Kay, M.D., Candace D. Dick, M.D., Richard W. Asinger, M.D., and John T. Vessey, Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 1998; 339:713-718September 10, 1998

Abstract

Background

After case reports of cardiac-valve abnormalities related to the use of appetite suppressants were published, we undertook a study to determine the prevalence of the problem using transthoracic echocardiography.

Methods

We examined patients who had taken dexfenfluramine alone, dexfenfluramine and phentermine, or fenfluramine and phentermine for various periods. We enrolled obese patients who had taken or were taking these agents during open-label trials from January 1994 through August 1997. We also recruited subjects who had not taken appetite suppressants and who were matched to the patients for sex, height, and pretreatment age and body-mass index. The presence of cardiac-valve abnormalities, defined by the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as at least mild aortic-valve or moderate mitral-valve insufficiency, was determined independently by at least two cardiologists. Multivariate logistic-regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with cardiac-valve abnormalities.

Results

Echocardiograms were available for 257 patients and 239 control subjects. The association between the use of any appetite suppressant and cardiac-valve abnormalities was analyzed in a final matched group of 233 pairs of patients and controls. A total of 1.3 percent of the controls (3 of 233) and 22.7 percent of the patients (53 of 233) met the case definition for cardiac-valve abnormalities (odds ratio, 22.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 7.1 to 114.2; P<0.001). The odds ratio for such cardiac-valve abnormalities was 12.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.9 to 56.4) with the use of dexfenfluramine alone, 24.5 (5.9 to 102.2) with the use of dexfenfluramine and phentermine, and 26.3 (7.9 to 87.1) with the use of fenfluramine and phentermine.

Conclusions

Obese patients who took fenfluramine and phentermine, dexfenfluramine alone, or dexfenfluramine and phentermine had a significantly higher prevalence of cardiac valvular insufficiency than a matched group of control subjects.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Degree of Aortic-Valve Insufficiency in 233 Patients and Their Matched Controls.
Table 1Extent of Aortic-Valve Insufficiency on Echocardiography, According to the Primary and Secondary Readers.
Article

Appetite-suppressant medications such as fenfluramine and phentermine have been used for several decades for the treatment of obesity, with phentermine approved for use in the United States in 1959 and fenfluramine approved in 1973. These medications were predominantly given as monotherapy for short periods (less than three months), but a change in the pattern of use occurred after the publication of a series of articles in 1992.1-9 These articles suggested the potential for the long-term use of fenfluramine in combination with phentermine. In the ensuing years, the use of appetite suppressants, particularly fenfluramine and phentermine in combination, increased exponentially.10 Dexfenfluramine, the d-isomer of fenfluramine, was initially marketed in Europe for the treatment of obesity, where its use was predominantly short term. In 1996, its use was approved in the United States for the long-term treatment of obesity. Since 1995, approximately 14 million prescriptions have been written for fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine, with the greatest product use among women and persons less than 60 years of age.11

On July 8, 1997, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a public health advisory after researchers found that 33 women who had taken fenfluramine and phentermine in combination (commonly called “fen–phen”) had unusual heart-valve morphology and regurgitation. The duration of treatment ranged from 1 to 28 months. The most common condition was multivalvular disease involving the mitral, aortic, and tricuspid valves. A published report on 24 of these 33 patients noted valvular insufficiency with unusual morphologic changes.12 These patients had used fenfluramine and phentermine for an average of 12 months. In five of these patients who had undergone valve replacement, the pathological findings resembled those of carcinoid heart disease or heart disease associated with ergotamine toxicity, both of which are serotonin-related syndromes. Subsequently, the FDA analyzed a series of independent reports from clinicians and investigators and estimated that the prevalence of valvular insufficiency among patients using various appetite suppressants was 20 to 30 percent. In consideration of these data, the manufacturer of fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine stopped marketing these drugs in the United States (a similar action followed in Europe). These data also prompted the Department of Health and Human Services to issue interim recommendations for health care professionals regarding cardiac-valve abnormalities in association with exposure to these drugs.11

A number of questions remained after these initial reports. In particular, it was not clear whether the valvular insufficiency was related to the use of these medications or was simply a consequence of obesity. The exact mechanisms involved in the development of valvular disease were not known. To investigate the effect of appetite suppressants on cardiac valvular insufficiency, we studied obese patients who had taken dexfenfluramine alone, dexfenfluramine in combination with phentermine, or fenfluramine in combination with phentermine as well as a matched group of obese control subjects who had not taken these medications. The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence and severity of valvular dysfunction in obese patients who had taken appetite suppressants and in those who had not.

Methods

Study Design

This cross-sectional study was approved by the human subjects research committee at Hennepin County Medical Center, an affiliated teaching hospital of the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, where the work was conducted. All participants provided informed consent before enrollment in the study.

The study was initiated in August 1997 and used echocardiography to estimate the prevalence of valvulopathy in patients who were currently taking or had taken appetite suppressants during open-label trials from January 1994 through August 1997. For comparison, a matched group of obese subjects who had not taken fenfluramine-derived appetite suppressants was recruited after August 1997 from the community at large.

Patients

The sole criterion for inclusion as a patient was participation in one of three appetite-suppressant studies previously conducted at Hennepin County Medical Center. To be eligible for these open-label studies, patients had to be more than 30 percent above their ideal weights. Potential participants were excluded if an assessment of their medical history or a physical examination conducted by one of two physicians revealed clinically significant cardiovascular or psychiatric disorders. All three studies used similar methods of screening for medical conditions, approaches to diet and behavior modification, and medical follow-up, but different appetite-suppressant regimens. The first study used fenfluramine (Pondimin, A.H. Robins, Richmond, Va.) at a dose of 60 to 120 mg per day in combination with phentermine (several brands) at a dose of 30 mg per day.13,14 The second used dexfenfluramine (Redux, Wyeth Laboratories, Philadelphia, under license from Interneuron, Lexington, Mass.) at a dose of 30 mg per day. The third allowed the optional use of phentermine (30 mg per day) for patients who did not lose the targeted amount of weight during dexfenfluramine (30 mg per day) monotherapy.14 A single team of health care professionals conducted all three studies. Of the 295 patients enrolled in the studies, 257 underwent echocardiography.

Control Subjects

We recruited potential control subjects by advertising in various media in the local metropolitan area. A total of 977 persons (789 women and 188 men) responded. Control subjects were matched to the patients for various pretreatment demographic characteristics: sex, age (within 4 years), height (within 3 in. [7.6 cm]), and body-mass index (within 15 percent). According to self-reports, the control subjects had not taken fenfluramine or its derivatives; one male subject who had taken dexfenfluramine for seven days was included. A total of 239 control subjects were matched to the patients.

Echocardiography

Complete echocardiographic examinations were performed with commercially available ultrasonographs (Sonos model 1000, 1500, or 2500, Hewlett–Packard, Andover, Mass.; Power Vision model SSA 380, Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan; or Sequoia, Acuson, Mountain View, Calif.) with M-mode, two-dimensional, and Doppler echocardiography (pulsed, continuous-wave, and color Doppler). Echocardiograms were obtained in standard parasternal long-axis and short-axis views; apical two-, four-, and five-chamber views; subcostal views; and suprasternal views (parallel to the aortic arch) and were recorded in real time on videotape.

Doppler Imaging

The height (width) of the aortic regurgitant jet at valve level and the width of the left ventricular outflow tract were measured on-line in the parasternal long-axis view.15,16 Additional M-mode color Doppler imaging was also performed to measure the width of the aortic regurgitant jet.17 Continuous-wave Doppler imaging of the aortic regurgitant jet was recorded in the apical five-chamber view for measurement of the pressure half-time, which is an index of severity. Pulsed Doppler measurements of flow in the abdominal aorta were recorded in the subcostal view and in the descending thoracic aorta in the suprasternal view. Pulsed Doppler transmitral diastolic flow velocities were measured at the level of the tips of the mitral-valve leaflets. Peak instantaneous flow rate and the effective area of the mitral regurgitant orifice were measured in subjects with mitral regurgitation,18,19 and pulsed Doppler measurement of pulmonary venous flow was performed when technically feasible. For subjects with identifiable tricuspid regurgitation, the right ventricular–right atrial maximal systolic-pressure gradient was estimated with the modified Bernoulli equation: gradient (in millimeters of mercury) = 4 v2, where v is the maximal velocity of the tricuspid regurgitant jet (in meters per second).20-22

Interpretation of Results

The primary reader reviewed all echocardiograms in a blinded fashion with regard to subjects' drug-exposure status. Results for a subgroup of echocardiograms (60 of the total of 496) from this study were previously reported to the FDA.11 The primary reader interpreted these results before echocardiograms from matched control subjects became available and thus was potentially aware of the appetite-suppressant status of the subjects of these 60 studies. All 496 echocardiograms were also interpreted by one of three secondary readers, using the original real-time videotape recordings, who were unaware of the subjects' drug-exposure status. Thus, each of the 496 echocardiograms was interpreted independently by at least two readers. The echocardiographic data, as described above, were available to all readers for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Acting independently, each reader graded valvular regurgitation for all valves as absent, trace, mild, moderate, or severe. The readers were not shown a reference set of echocardiograms before or during the study. The definition of cardiac-valve abnormalities was that adopted by the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: mild aortic-valve insufficiency or more severe disease or moderate mitral-valve insufficiency or more severe disease.11 In the event of disagreement between the primary and secondary readers regarding cardiac-valve abnormalities that met the case definition, a randomly selected third reader provided independent interpretation and served as the tiebreaker. If the two independent readers agreed that cardiac-valve abnormalities were present or absent, then no further attempt was made to reconcile any differences in the grading of valvular insufficiency. The primary reader and all secondary readers were experienced echocardiographers and board-certified cardiologists. According to the Hennepin County Medical Center's computerized echocardiographic data base, the primary reader had interpreted 14,267 echocardiograms from March 1986 to December 1997, including 10,972 Doppler studies.

Collection of Other Data

Medical diagnoses including hypertension and diabetes were verified from the patients' medical records or by control subjects' self-reports. A research assistant administered a questionnaire to the control subjects by telephone regarding their demographic characteristics; personal habits (smoking and alcohol intake); medical history, with emphasis on known cardiopulmonary disorders; and use of appetite suppressants. Height, weight, and blood pressure were documented at the time of echocardiography.

The patients' medical records were used to determine when appetite-suppressant use began and ended during the previous studies at our institution. In approximately 10 percent of the medical records, the date on which treatment was stopped was not given, indicating instances in which the patient had missed the scheduled follow-up visit and had subsequently dropped out of the study. In the case of these patients, the stopping date used was the date 90 days after the patient's last noted medical visit (90 days was the maximal number of days of drug therapy possible through authorized prescription refills).

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis was completed with SPSS for Windows (version 7.5). The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess concordance of echocardiographic results with respect to the degree of valvular insufficiency. Kappa values were calculated to assess agreement between the primary reader and all secondary readers on cases of cardiac-valve abnormalities that met the case definition. Univariate analyses were used to identify differences in continuous or categorical variables with respect to drug-exposure status and the presence or absence of cardiac-valve abnormalities. Multivariate logistic-regression analysis was used to test continuous or categorical variables obtained from the medical history, demographic characteristics, and measurement factors that might be associated with cardiac-valve abnormalities. Variables were retained in the final analysis only if they were independent risk factors for cardiac-valve abnormalities that met the case definition or if the variables confounded the association between drug use and cardiac-valve abnormalities. All reported P values are two-sided.

Results

Degree of Agreement between Readers of Echocardiograms

Table 1Table 1Extent of Aortic-Valve Insufficiency on Echocardiography, According to the Primary and Secondary Readers. and Table 2Table 2Extent of Mitral-Valve Insufficiency on Echocardiography, According to the Primary and Secondary Readers. show the concordance between the primary reader and all secondary readers for all 496 cardiac ultrasound studies with respect to aortic-valve and mitral-valve insufficiency. The Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.88 (P<0.001) for the interpretations of aortic-valve insufficiency and 0.63 (P<0.001) for the interpretations of mitral-valve insufficiency. Table 3Table 3Cases of Cardiac-Valve Abnormalities on Echocardiography, According to the Primary and Secondary Readers. shows the concordance between the primary reader and all secondary readers regarding cardiac-valve abnormalities that met the case definition (kappa value, 0.79; P<0.001).

Final Analysis

Of the 295 patients enrolled in the three appetite-suppressant studies conducted at our institution, 257 (87 percent) agreed to participate in the current study. A matched control subject was found for 239 of the 257 patients (93 percent). We included all 496 study subjects in the analysis of the association between the use of appetite suppressants and cardiac-valve abnormalities. The resultant odds ratio was 21.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 6.8 to 108.2).

Of the 257 patients, 6 (5 female and 1 male) were excluded from the final analysis because their use of appetite suppressants exceeded that called for by the treatment protocols. A suitable match could not be found for an additional 18 patients (3 men and 7 women who took fenfluramine in combination with phentermine, 2 men who took dexfenfluramine in combination with phentermine, and 4 men and 2 women who took dexfenfluramine alone). Table 4Table 4Demographic Characteristics of 233 Patients and Their Matched Controls. shows the demographic characteristics of the remaining 233 patients and their matched controls. The two groups were well matched, with no significant differences in sex, age, body-mass index, or weight. Of the 233 patients, 41 (18 percent) were taking appetite suppressants at the time of echocardiography, 47 (20 percent) underwent echocardiography within 30 days after they stopped taking the medication, 71 (30 percent) underwent echocardiography 1 to 6 months after discontinuing treatment, and 74 (32 percent) underwent echocardiography more than 6 months after discontinuing treatment.

As shown in Table 5Table 5Cases of Cardiac-Valve Abnormalities Meeting the Case Definition., cardiac-valve abnormalities that met the case definition were present in 1.3 percent of the control subjects (3 of 233) and 22.7 percent of the patients (53 of 233) (odds ratio, 22.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 7.1 to 114.2; P<0.001).

The results of the multivariate logistic-regression analysis are shown in Table 6Table 6Multivariate Logistic-Regression Analysis of Predictors of Cardiac-Valve Abnormalities That Met the Case Definition by Cardiac Echocardiography.. Age, as a continuous variable, was the only covariate that was an independent predictor of cardiac-valve abnormalities that met the case definition. None of the other covariates were independent predictors or confounders of the association between such cardiac-valve abnormalities and the use of appetite suppressants. Consequently, the final model contains only age and type of appetite suppressant as predictors of cardiac-valve abnormalities. Figure 1Figure 1Degree of Aortic-Valve Insufficiency in 233 Patients and Their Matched Controls. shows the overall prevalence of aortic-valve insufficiency among the patients and control subjects.

Discussion

Cardiac valvular disease has multiple causes, including congenital disorders, such as bicuspid aortic valve, and acquired conditions, such as infection, trauma, and (less commonly) carcinoid syndrome.23,24 Ergot alkaloids such as methysergide have been implicated as causes of valvular disease.25 Recent case reports have suggested an association between cardiac-valve abnormalities and the use of serotonergic appetite suppressants, but the mechanism of drug-related valvular dysfunction is unknown.11,12

The initial published reports of valvular disease associated with the use of appetite suppressants described a severe multivalvular condition.11,12 We as well as others subsequently reported additional cases of valvular dysfunction, most commonly aortic-valve insufficiency.11 Aortic-valve insufficiency is uncommon in the general population, especially in people under the age of 50 years. Available estimates suggest a prevalence of 1 to 2 percent in this age group.26-31 The interpretation of both the initial and the subsequent case reports was necessarily limited by the absence of an appropriate comparison group — that is, a matched group of similarly obese subjects who had not used appetite suppressants.

Our data show that the prevalence of valvular insufficiency is significantly higher among patients who have taken appetite suppressants than among subjects matched for age, sex, and body-mass index who have not taken such drugs. The most common — and often the only — abnormality that met the case definition in our study was aortic-valve insufficiency. Using univariate analysis, we found a significant relation between the use of appetite suppressants and the presence of cardiac-valve abnormalities that met the case definition. Multiple logistic-regression models clearly showed significant increases in the risk of valve disease with the use of appetite suppressants, regardless of the drug regimen. Although the odds ratios for such cardiac-valve abnormalities with the use of a combination of dexfenfluramine and phentermine (24.5) and fenfluramine and phentermine (26.3) were twice the odds ratio with dexfenfluramine alone (12.7), these data are confounded by the duration of treatment. The duration of treatment differed among the three subgroups, and the effect of this variable on the relative prevalence of valvular insufficiency requires further study.

A higher percentage of patients than controls had trace aortic-valve insufficiency. This finding suggests that the case-definition threshold for cardiac-valve abnormalities in association with appetite suppressants set by the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be too high.

We analyzed our data to determine which factors might predispose patients to valvular insufficiency. As shown in Table 6, only age at the time drug therapy was initiated and the use of dexfenfluramine or combinations of dexfenfluramine and phentermine or fenfluramine and phentermine were statistically significant. The natural history and therefore the clinical significance of appetite-suppressant–associated valvular insufficiency are not known. Follow-up studies of patients with valvular dysfunction and those without it, as well as of matched control subjects are needed to help define the natural history of valvular insufficiency. Until such research has been conducted, the Department of Health and Human Services has issued interim guidelines for the evaluation and care of patients who have taken appetite suppressants that include prophylaxis against bacterial endocarditis.11

When used to diagnose valvular insufficiency, echocardiography requires both objective criteria and the subjective interpretation of images. To minimize bias in the diagnosis of valvular dysfunction in the present study, secondary readers were not told which subjects had taken appetite suppressants. The primary reader was unaware of the subjects' history of appetite-suppressant use in the case of 436 of 496 echocardiograms. Furthermore, the secondary readers did not know how the primary reader had interpreted the echocardiograms. As shown in Table 1, the concordance among readers was excellent, despite the absence of any reference set or attempts to improve concordance.

In conclusion, our data show that patients who took fenfluramine and phentermine, dexfenfluramine alone, or dexfenfluramine and phentermine had a significantly higher prevalence of cardiac valvular insufficiency than matched control subjects. In experienced hands, echocardiography is a reproducible and objective means of assessing the presence of drug-related valvular insufficiency. The clinical significance and natural history of this type of valvular disease are currently unknown.

Supported in part by a grant (3P30-DK50456-03S1) from the National Institutes of Health Minnesota Obesity–Nutrition Research Center and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA-5960) with the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

We are indebted to the clinical staff of the Hennepin County Medical Center Diabetes Center and our cardiac sonographers, to the Hewlett–Packard and Acuson corporations for technical support, and to Susan Yanovski, M.D., of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases for her helpful suggestions and critique.

Source Information

From the Divisions of Endocrinology (M.A.K., J.V.S.), Cardiology (C.A.H., R.W.A.), and Internal Medicine (G.G.H.), Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center; Health System Minnesota (R.M.-K.); Minnesota Heart Clinic (C.D.D.); the Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota (J.T.V.); and the Minnesota Obesity Center (M.A.K., J.V.S., G.G.H., J.T.V.) — all in Minneapolis.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Khan at the Division of Endocrinology, 701 Park Ave., 865B, Minneapolis, MN 55415.

References

References

  1. 1

    Weintraub M, Sundaresan PR, Madan M, et al. Long-term weight control study. I. (Weeks 0 to 34): the enhancement of behavior modification, caloric restriction, and exercise by fenfluramine plus phentermine versus placebo. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;51:586-594
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Weintraub M, Sundaresan PR, Schuster B, et al. Long-term weight control study. II. (Weeks 34 to 104): an open-label study of continuous fenfluramine plus phentermine versus targeted intermittent medication as adjuncts to behavior modification, caloric restriction, and exercise. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;51:595-601
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Weintraub M, Sundaresan PR, Schuster B, Moscucci M, Stein EC. Long-term weight control study. III. (Weeks 104 to 156): an open-label study of dose adjustment of fenfluramine and phentermine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;51:602-607
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Weintraub M, Sundaresan PR, Schuster B, et al. Long-term weight control study. IV. (Weeks 156 to 190): the second double-blind phase. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;51:608-614
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Weintraub M, Sundaresan PR, Schuster B, Averbuch M, Stein EC, Byrne L. Long-term weight control study. V. (Weeks 190 to 210): follow-up of participants after cessation of medication. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;51:615-618
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Weintraub M, Sundaresan PR, Cox C. Long-term weight control study. VI. Individual participant response patterns. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;51:619-633
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Weintraub M, Sundaresan PR, Schuster B. Long-term weight control study. VII. (Weeks 0 to 210): serum lipid changes. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;51:634-641
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Weintraub M. Long-term weight control study: conclusions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;51:642-646
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Weintraub M. Long-term weight control: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute funded multimodal intervention study. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;51:581-585[Erratum, Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;52:323.]
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Kushner R. The treatment of obesity: a call for prudence and professionalism. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:602-604
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Cardiac valvulopathy associated with exposure to fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine: US. Department of Health and Human Services interim public health recommendations, November 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997;46:1061-1066
    Medline

  12. 12

    Connolly HM, Crary JL, McGoon MD, et al. Valvular heart disease associated with fenfluramine-phentermine. N Engl J Med 1997;337:581-588[Erratum, N Engl J Med 1997;337:1783.]
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Hartley GG, Nicol S, Halstenson C, Khan M, Pheley A, St Peter JV. Long-term results from phentermine, fenfluramine, diet, behavior modification, and exercise for treatment of obesity. Obes Res 1997;5:58S-58S abstract.

  14. 14

    Khan MA, St Peter JV, Hartley GG, Pheley AM, McFarland KA. The effect of adding phentermine to weight management therapy in patients with declining response to dexfenfluramine alone. Obes Res 1997;5:Suppl 1:22S-22S abstract.

  15. 15

    Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byard C, Soto B. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:952-959
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Dolan MS, Castello R, St Aguirre F, Labovitz AJ. Quantitation of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography: a practical approach. Am Heart J 1995;129:1014-1020
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Tribouilloy C, Shen WF, Slama M, et al. Assessment of severity of aortic regurgitation by M-mode colour Doppler flow imaging. Eur Heart J 1991;12:352-356
    Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Bargiggia GS, Tronconi L, Sahn DJ, et al. A new method for quantitation of mitral regurgitation based on color flow Doppler imaging of flow convergence proximal to regurgitant orifice. Circulation 1991;84:1481-1489
    Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Enriquez-Sarano M, Seward JB, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Effective regurgitant orifice area: a noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:443-451
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Yock PG, Popp RL. Noninvasive estimation of right ventricular systolic pressure by Doppler ultrasound in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. Circulation 1984;70:657-662
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Berger M, Haimowitz A, Van Tosh A, Berdoff RL, Goldberg E. Quantitative assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with tricuspid regurgitation using continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;6:359-365
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Currie PJ, Seward JB, Chan KL, et al. Continuous wave Doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: a simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;6:750-756
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Pellikka PA, Tajik AJ, Khandheria BK, et al. Carcinoid heart disease: clinical and echocardiographic spectrum in 74 patients. Circulation 1993;87:1188-1196
    Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Robiolio PA, Rigolin VH, Wilson JS, et al. Carcinoid heart disease: correlation of high serotonin levels with valvular abnormalities detected by cardiac catheterization and echocardiography. Circulation 1995;92:790-795
    Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Redfield MM, Nicholson WJ, Edwards WD, Tajik AJ. Valve disease associated with ergot alkaloid use: echocardiographic and pathologic correlations. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:50-52
    Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Akasaka T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, et al. Age-related valvular regurgitation: a study by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1987;76:262-265
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  27. 27

    Yoshida K, Yoshikawa J, Shakudo M, et al. Color Doppler evaluation of valvular regurgitation in normal subjects. Circulation 1988;78:840-847
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Choong CY, Abascal VM, Weyman J, et al. Prevalence of valvular regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography in patients with structurally normal hearts by two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 1989;117:636-642
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Klein AL, Burstow DJ, Tajik AJ, et al. Age-related prevalence of valvular regurgitation in normal subjects: a comprehensive color flow examination of 118 volunteers. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1990;3:54-63
    Medline

  30. 30

    Reid CL, Gardin JM, Yunis C, Kurosaki T, Flack JM. Prevalence and clinical correlates of aortic and mitral regurgitation in a young adult population: the CARDIA Study. Circulation 1994;90:Suppl I:I-282 abstract.

  31. 31

    Gray GW, Salisbury DA, Gulino AM. Echocardiographic and color flow Doppler findings in military pilot applicants. Aviat Space Environ Med 1995;66:32-34
    Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (71)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    2012. Serotoninergic and Mixed Agents. , 255-274.
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Joshua D. Hutcheson, Vincent Setola, Bryan L. Roth, W. David Merryman. (2011) Serotonin receptors and heart valve disease—It was meant 2B. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 132:2, 146-157
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    P. Yerly, J. -L. Vachiéry. (2011) Anorexigènes et maladies cardiovasculaires : les liaisons dangereuses. Réanimation 20:5, 424-435
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    A. Boudes, C. Lavoute, J.-F. Avierinos, Y. Le Dolley, C. Villacampa, A. Salem, A. D. Loundou, N. Michel, S. Renard, G. Habib. (2011) Valvular heart disease associated with benfluorex therapy: high prevalence in patients with unexplained restrictive valvular heart disease. European Journal of Echocardiography 12:9, 688-695
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Alain Weill, Michel Païta, Philippe Tuppin, Jean-Paul Fagot, Anke Neumann, Dominique Simon, Philippe Ricordeau, Jean-Louis Montastruc, Hubert Allemand. (2010) Benfluorex and valvular heart disease: a cohort study of a million people with diabetes mellitus. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 19:12, 1256-1262
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Shahzad G Raja, Sanjeev Bhattacharyya, Joseph Davar, Gilles D Dreyfus. (2010) Surgery for carcinoid heart disease: current outcomes, concerns and controversies. Future Cardiology 6:5, 647-655
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    C. Tribouilloy, D. Rusinaru, P. Henon, L. Tribouilloy, F. Leleu, M. Andrejak, H. Sevestre, M. Peltier, T. Caus. (2010) Restrictive organic mitral regurgitation associated with benfluorex therapy. European Journal of Echocardiography 11:7, 614-621
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Sanjeev Bhattacharyya, Anthony H Schapira, Dimitri P Mikhailidis, Joseph Davar. (2009) Drug-induced fibrotic valvular heart disease. The Lancet 374:9689, 577-585
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Sakima A. Smith, Alan D. Waggoner, Lisa de las Fuentes, Victor G. Davila-Roman. (2009) Role of Serotoninergic Pathways in Drug-Induced Valvular Heart Disease and Diagnostic Features by Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 22:8, 883-889
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    S. Droogmans, D. Kerkhove, B. Cosyns, G. Van Camp. (2009) Role of echocardiography in toxic heart valvulopathy. European Journal of Echocardiography 10:4, 467-476
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Hikaru WATANABE, Kiyoshi KUBOTA. (2009) Rinsho yakuri/Japanese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 40:1, 41-46
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Richard M Fleming. (2008) Safety of ephedra and related anorexic medications. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 7:6, 749-759
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Normand G. Boulé, Jean-Philippe Chaput, Eric Doucet, Denis Richard, Jean-Pierre Després, Claude Bouchard, Angelo Tremblay. (2008) Glucose homeostasis predicts weight gain: prospective and clinical evidence. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews 24:2, 123-129
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Gregory Stefano, Keith Fox, Mark Schluchter, Brian D. Hoit. (2008) Prevalence of Unsuspected and Significant Mitral and Aortic Regurgitation. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 21:1, 38-42
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Alain M. Bernheim, Heidi M. Connolly, Timothy J. Hobday, Martin D. Abel, Patricia A. Pellikka. (2007) Carcinoid Heart Disease. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 49:6, 439-451
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Benoit Drolet, Chantale Simard, Paul Poirier. (2007) Impact of Weight-Loss Medications on the Cardiovascular System. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 7:4, 273-288
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    L D Whigham, N V Dhurandhar, P S Rahko, R L Atkinson. (2006) Comparison of combinations of drugs for treatment of obesity: body weight and echocardiographic status. International Journal of Obesity
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Tori L. Schaefer, Lisa A. Ehrman, Gary A. Gudelsky, Charles V. Vorhees, Michael T. Williams. (2006) Comparison of monoamine and corticosterone levels 24 h following (+)methamphetamine, (+/–)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, cocaine, (+)fenfluramine or (+/–)methylphenidate administration in the neonatal rat. Journal of Neurochemistry 98:5, 1369-1378
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Pilar Tornos. (2006) Enfermedad valvular en mujeres. Revista Española de Cardiología 59:8, 832-836
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Julius M. Gardin, Ginger Constantine, Kelly Davis, Cyril Leung, Cheryl L. Reid. (2006) Aortic Valvular Regurgitation: Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics in a Predominantly Obese Adult Population Not Taking Anorexigens. Echocardiography 23:7, 569-576
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Lisa L Ioannides-Demos, Joseph Proietto, Andrew M Tonkin, John J McNeil. (2006) Safety of Drug Therapies Used for Weight Loss and Treatment of Obesity. Drug Safety 29:4, 277-302
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    2006. Fenfluramines. , 1333-1344.
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Frank L Greenway, Mary K Caruso. (2005) Safety of obesity drugs. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 4:6, 1083-1095
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Vincent Setola, Bryan L Roth. (2005) Screening the receptorome reveals molecular targets responsible for drug-induced side effects: focus on ‘fen–phen’. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 1:3, 377-387
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Stephan Krähenbühl. 2004. Adverse Effects and Drug–Drug Interactions. , 285-296.
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Raj S Padwal, Diana Rucker, Stephanie K Li, Cintia Curioni, David CW Lau, Raj S Padwal. 2003. Long-term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight. .
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Stephen F. Dierdorf. (2003) Carcinoid tumor and carcinoid syndrome. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 16:3, 343-347
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    H. G. Kinnell. (2003) European withdrawal of appetite suppressants. Obesity Reviews 4:2, 79-81
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Eric Doucet, Sylvie St-Pierre, Natalie Alméras, Angelo Tremblay. (2003) Relation between appetite ratings before and after a standard meal and estimates of daily energy intake in obese and reduced obese individuals. Appetite 40:2, 137-143
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    N. Finer. (2002) Pharmacotherapy of obesity. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 16:4, 717-742
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Frank F. Seghatol, Vera H. Rigolin. (2002) Appetite suppressants and valvular heart disease. Current Opinion in Cardiology 17:5, 486-492
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Harold Bays, Carlos Dujovne. (2002) Anti-obesity drug development. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 11:9, 1189-1204
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    L. L. Morford, S. L. Inman-Wood, G. A. Gudelsky, M. T. Williams, C. V. Vorhees. (2002) Impaired spatial and sequential learning in rats treated neonatally with d-fenfluramine. European Journal of Neuroscience 16:3, 491-500
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    R Padwal, SK Li, DCW Lau. 2002. Long-term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight. .
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Andrei Barasch, Monika M. Safford. (2002) Diet medications and valvular hearl disease: the current evidence. Special Care in Dentistry 22:3, 108-114
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Kenneth Lyons Jones, Kathleen A. Johnson, Lyn M. Dick, Robert J. Felix, Kelly K. Kao, Christina D. Chambers. (2002) Pregnancy outcomes after first trimester exposure to phentermine/fenfluramine. Teratology 65:3, 125-130
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Robert F. Kushner, Hazel Manzano. (2002) Obesity pharmacology: past, present, and future. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 18:2, 213-220
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Anthony W. Fox. (2002) Migraine Therapy. Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy 2:4, 3-18
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    D. Samenuk, M. S. Link, M. K. Homoud, R. Contreras, T. C. Theohardes, P. J. Wang, N. A. M. Estes. (2002) Adverse Cardiovascular Events Temporally Associated With Ma Huang, an Herbal Source of Ephedrine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 77:1, 12-16
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Paul C. McDonald, Janet E. Wilson, Bruce M. McManus. (2001) Fen-Phen Valve Disease: A Real Entity?. Pathology Case Reviews 6:6, 281-286
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Florence Fenollar, Pierre‐Edouard Fournier, M. Patrizia Carrieri, Gilbert Habib, Thierry Messana, Didier Raoult. (2001) Risks Factors and Prevention of Q Fever Endocarditis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 33:3, 312-316
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Eric Doucet, Sylvie St-Pierre, Natalie Alméras, Jean-Pierre Després, Claude Bouchard, Angelo Tremblay. (2001) Evidence for the existence of adaptive thermogenesis during weight loss. British Journal of Nutrition 85:06, 715
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Evangelos D. Michelakis, E. Kenneth Weir. (2001) Anorectic Drugs and Pulmonary Hypertension from the Bedside to the Bench. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 321:4, 292-299
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Neil J. Weissman. (2001) Appetite Suppressants and Valvular Heart Disease. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 321:4, 285-291
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Stephen MacMahon, Rory Collins. (2001) Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, II: observational studies. The Lancet 357:9254, 455-462
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    David C Spencer, Jane Hwang, Martha J Morrell. (2000) Fenfluramine–Phentermine (Fen-Phen) and Seizures: Evidence for an Association. Epilepsy & Behavior 1:6, 448-452
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Michael J. Devlin, Juli A. Goldfein, Janel S. Carino, Sara L. Wolk. (2000) Open treatment of overweight binge eaters with phentermine and fluoxetine as an adjunct to cognitive-behavioral therapy. International Journal of Eating Disorders 28:3, 325-332
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Richard D Mattes, Leslie Bormann. (2000) Effects of (−)-hydroxycitric acid on appetitive variables. Physiology & Behavior 71:1-2, 87-94
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    MICHAEL H. BAUMANN, MARIO A. AYESTAS, CHRISTINA M. DERSCH, JOHN S. PARTILLA, RICHARD B. ROTHMAN. (2000) Serotonin Transporters, Serotonin Release, and the Mechanism of Fenfluramine Neurotoxicity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 914:1, 172-186
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Christopher Gay, Laura Shane-McWhorter, Kathy Williams, Mary Bishop Stone. (2000) Physician Prescribing of Anorexigenics for Weight Loss in Salt Lake County, Utah. Pharmacotherapy 20:8, 967-973
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Nathaniel E Lebowitz, Jonathan N Bella, Mary J Roman, Jennifer E Liu, Dawn P Fishman, Mary Paranicas, Elisa T Lee, Richard R Fabsitz, Thomas K Welty, Barbara V Howard, Richard B Devereux. (2000) Prevalence and correlates of aortic regurgitation in american indians: the Strong Heart Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 36:2, 461-467
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Chari Y. Teramae, Heidi M. CONNOLLY, Martha Grogan, Fletcher A. Miller. (2000) Diet Drug-Related Cardiac Valve Disease: The Mayo Clinic Echocardiographic Laboratory Experience. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 75:5, 456-461
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    C Y Teramae, H M Connolly, M Grogan, F A Miller. (2000) Diet drug-related cardiac valve disease: the Mayo Clinic echocardiographic laboratory experience.. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 75:5, 456-461
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Donald D. Hensrud. (2000) PHARMACOTHERAPY FOR OBESITY. Medical Clinics of North America 84:2, 463-476
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Sridharan Rajamani, Christian Studenik, Rosa Lemmens-Gruber, Peter Heistracher. (2000) Cardiotoxic effects of fenfluramine hydrochloride on isolated cardiac preparations and ventricular myocytes of guinea-pigs. British Journal of Pharmacology 129:5, 843-852
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Donna H. Ryan. (2000) Recent progress in obesity pharmacotherapy. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 16:2, 166-172
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Richard W. Asinger. (1999) The Fen-Phen Controversy: Is Regression Another Piece of the Puzzle?. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 74:12, 1302-1304
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    D D Hensrud, H M Connolly, M Grogan, F A Miller, K R Bailey, M D Jensen. (1999) Echocardiographic improvement over time after cessation of use of fenfluramine and phentermine.. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 74:12, 1191-1197
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Ananth Prasad, Mandeep Mehra, Myung Park, Robert Scott, Patricia A Uber, P.Michael McFadden. (1999) Cardiac allograft valvulopathy: a case of donor-anorexigen-induced valvular disease. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 68:5, 1840-1841
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Andrew J Burger, Howard B Sherman, Mark J Charlamb, Juhee Kim, Laura A Asinas, Stacy R Flickner, George L Blackburn. (1999) Low prevalence of valvular heart disease in 226 phentermine-fenfluramine protocol subjects prospectively followed for up to 30 months. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 34:4, 1153-1158
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Mike J. Bickerdike, Steven P. Vickers, Colin T. Dourish. (1999) 5-HT2C receptor modulation and the treatment of obesity. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 1:4, 207-214
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Shankha S Biswas, Carolyn L Donovan, Joseph M Forbess, Stephen H Royal, Kevin P Landolfo. (1999) Valve replacement for appetite suppressant–induced valvular heart disease. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 67:6, 1819-1822
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Donald J. Willison, Stuart M. MacLeod. (1999) The role of research evidence in pharmaceutical policy making: evidence when necessary but not necessarily evidence. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5:2, 243-249
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Kulke, Matthew H., Mayer, Robert J., . (1999) Carcinoid Tumors. New England Journal of Medicine 340:11, 858-868
    Full Text

  65. 65

    Rainer Koch, Arya M. Sharma. (1999) Obesity and cardiovascular hemodynamic function. Current Hypertension Reports 1:2, 127-130
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    (1999) Appetite-Suppressant Drugs and Valvular Heart Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 340:6, 476-480
    Full Text

  67. 67

    Wood, Alastair J.J., Stein, C. Michael, , Woosley, Raymond, . (1998) Making Medicines Safer — The Need for an Independent Drug Safety Board. New England Journal of Medicine 339:25, 1851-1854
    Full Text

  68. 68

    RobertO. Bonow, Blase Carabello, AntonioC. de Leon, L.Henry Edmunds, BradleyJ. Fedderly, MichaelD. Freed, WilliamH. Gaasch, CharlesR. McKay, RickA. Nishimura, PatrickT. O’Gara, RobertA. O’Rourke, ShahbudinH. Rahimtoola, JamesL. Ritchie, MelvinD. Cheitlin, KimA. Eagle, TimothyJ. Gardner, Arthur Garson, RaymondJ. Gibbons, RobertA. O’Rourke, RichardO. Russell, ThomasJ. Ryan, SidneyC. Smith. (1998) ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 32:5, 1486-1582
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    I Mclean Baird. (1998) Risks of heart-valve abnormalities with appetite suppressants. The Lancet 352:9138, 1403-1404
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    P Godeau. (1998) Hypertension artérielle pulmonaire et valvulopathies induites par les fenfluramines? Hypothèses ou certitudes? Mythe ou réalité?Primary pulmonary hypertension, valvular heart disease and fenfluramine use? Hypothesis or certitudes? Legend or reality?. La Revue de Médecine Interne 19:10, 700-703
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Devereux, Richard B., . (1998) Appetite Suppressants and Valvular Heart Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 339:11, 765-767
    Full Text

Letters