Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

A Comparison of Clozapine and Haloperidol in Hospitalized Patients with Refractory Schizophrenia

Robert Rosenheck, M.D., Joyce Cramer, B.S., Weichun Xu, Ph.D., Jonathan Thomas, M.S., William Henderson, Ph.D., Linda Frisman, Ph.D., Carol Fye, R.Ph., M.S., and Dennis Charney, M.D. for the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Clozapine in Refractory Schizophrenia

N Engl J Med 1997; 337:809-815September 18, 1997

Abstract

Background

Clozapine, a relatively expensive antipsychotic drug, is widely used to treat patients with refractory schizophrenia. It has a low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects but may cause agranulocytosis. There have been no long-term assessments of its effect on symptoms, social functioning, and the use and cost of health care.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, one-year, double-blind comparative study of clozapine (in 205 patients) and haloperidol (in 218 patients) at 15 Veterans Affairs medical centers. All participants had refractory schizophrenia and had been hospitalized for the disease for 30 to 364 days in the previous year. All patients received case-management and social-rehabilitation services, as clinically indicated.

Results

In the clozapine group, 117 patients (57 percent) continued their assigned treatment for the entire year, as compared with 61 (28 percent) of the patients in the haloperidol group (P<0.001). As judged according to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale of Schizophrenia, patients in the clozapine group had 5.4 percent lower symptom levels than those in the haloperidol group at all follow-up evaluations (mean score, 79.1 vs. 83.6; P = 0.02). The differences on a quality-of-life scale were not significant in the intention-to-treat analysis, but they were significant among patients who did not cross over to the other treatment (P = 0.003). Over a one-year period, patients assigned to clozapine had fewer mean days of hospitalization for psychiatric reasons than patients assigned to haloperidol (143.8 vs. 168.1 days, P = 0.03) and used more outpatient services (133.6 vs. 97.9 units of service, P = 0.03). The total per capita costs to society were high — $58,151 in the clozapine group and $60,885 in the haloperidol group (P = 0.41). The per capita costs of antipsychotic drugs were $3,199 in the clozapine group and $367 in the haloperidol group (P<0.001). Patients assigned to clozapine had less tardive dyskinesia and fewer extrapyramidal side effects. Agranulocytosis developed in three patients in the clozapine group; all recovered fully.

Conclusions

For patients with refractory schizophrenia and high levels of hospital use, clozapine was somewhat more effective than haloperidol and had fewer side effects and similar overall costs.

Media in This Article

Figure 2Quality-of-Life Outcomes (Total Scores on the Heinrichs–Carpenter Scale) among Patients Assigned to Clozapine or Haloperidol, According to Whether They Completed Treatment or Crossed Over to the Other Treatment.
Figure 1Symptom Outcomes (Total Scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) among Patients Assigned to Clozapine or Haloperidol, According to Whether They Completed Treatment or Crossed Over to the Other Treatment.
Article

Schizophrenia is a chronic, disabling mental illness that affects approximately 1 percent of the U.S. population and costs $33 billion per year.1,2 Although conventional antipsychotic drugs have been the mainstay of treatment since the mid-1950s, only 70 percent of patients respond to these agents.3 Recently, clozapine was found to be more efficacious than standard drugs in patients with schizophrenia that was refractory to treatment.4-7 Although studies have shown that clozapine reduces “positive” symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions,8 its efficacy as compared with that of traditional antipsychotic agents is unclear for “negative” symptoms, such as blunted affect and lack of motivation, and for social functioning.9-12 As compared with other drugs for schizophrenia, clozapine is associated with a far lower incidence of extrapyramidal and related adverse effects.13

Unfortunately, clozapine is associated with potentially fatal agranulocytosis in about 1 percent of patients.14,15 Since this blood dyscrasia can be reversed by discontinuing the drug, safety can be monitored with weekly white-cell testing.15

Clozapine is more expensive than most other antipsychotic drugs (although it is not more expensive than many treatments for severe medical illnesses). The estimated yearly cost of clozapine for a typical patient receiving 300 to 400 mg per day is $4,500, plus an additional $1,000 for blood monitoring — 11 times the typical annual cost of conventional antipsychotic drugs.16 Several nonexperimental studies have suggested that the additional cost of clozapine treatment may be more than offset by the consequent reduction in hospital costs,17-19 and one controlled trial showed reduced rates of readmission and fewer days in the hospital with clozapine.20

If the use of clozapine rather than conventional drugs resulted in significant cost savings or was neutral with respect to cost, the additional expenditure for the treatment would be worthwhile. If clozapine resulted in greater costs than conventional therapy, widespread use of clozapine would have to be weighed against its benefits. We compared the long-term effectiveness and cost of clozapine with those of haloperidol, a widely used conventional treatment. The primary outcomes measured were symptoms of schizophrenia, quality of life, days in the hospital for psychiatric reasons, and costs.

Methods

Between March 1993 and April 1995, patients hospitalized at 15 Veterans Affairs medical centers were randomly assigned to receive clozapine (Clozaril) or haloperidol (Haldol) for 12 months. The protocol was approved by the human-rights committee at each participating medical center, and all patients gave written informed consent.

Entry Criteria

The study targeted patients with schizophrenia refractory to treatment and a history of a high level of use of inpatient services, defined as 30 to 364 days of hospitalization for schizophrenia during the previous year. Nationwide, 43 percent of all inpatients in Veterans Affairs hospitals with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia meet these utilization criteria, and these patients account for 73 percent of all treatment days for schizophrenia in Veterans Affairs hospitals. Clinical eligibility criteria consisted of a diagnosis of schizophrenia, as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (third edition, revised) (DSM-III-R),21 on the basis of the results of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R22; refractoriness, defined as persisting psychotic symptoms despite adequate treatment trials of two or more antipsychotic drugs at 1000-mg chlorpromazine equivalents unless limited by adverse effects; severe symptoms, indicated by scores on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale23 and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale24; and serious social dysfunction for the previous two years.

Patients were excluded if they were unable to give informed consent, had been treated previously with clozapine, had a current myeloproliferative disorder, or were pregnant. Virtually all patients screened for the study were accepted.

Pharmacotherapy

After base-line assessments had been completed, the patients were randomly assigned, within centers, to treatment with clozapine (100 to 900 mg per day) or haloperidol (5 to 30 mg per day). The dose was adjusted as clinically indicated; 12 fixed dosage levels were used. The patients receiving haloperidol also received benztropine mesylate (2 to 10 mg per day) for extrapyramidal side effects, and the patients receiving clozapine received a matching benztropine placebo. To maintain blinding, the patients receiving haloperidol also had weekly blood counts taken, as is required for patients treated with clozapine.

Psychosocial Treatment

To assess the potential effectiveness of clozapine in typical clinical practice, a predefined program of locally available adjunctive psychotherapeutic and rehabilitative treatment was offered to the patients through a structured process of treatment planning.

Assessment of Outcome and Reliability of Ratings

Symptom outcome was assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, in which high scores indicate worse symptoms and a 20 percent reduction is considered to represent clinically important improvement (range of possible scores, 30 to 210).25 Social functioning and quality of life were evaluated with the Heinrichs–Carpenter Quality-of-Life Scale, a scale in which the clinician rates social functioning and severe behavioral deficits and a 20 percent increase indicates clinically important improvement (range of possible scores, 0 to 126).26 The side effects of the medications were assessed with scales in which higher scores uniformly indicate more serious problems: the Barnes Akathisia Scale for restlessness27 (range of possible scores, 0 to 14), the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale for tardive dyskinesia (range of possible scores, 0 to 40),28 the Simpson–Angus Scale for extrapyramidal syndromes (range of possible scores, 0 to 40),29 and a weekly checklist of adverse reactions (e.g., hypotension, hypersalivation, and sedation).

All interviewers were trained and received annual reassessments of interrater reliability based on videotaped demonstration interviews. A statistical method was developed to assess the reliability of multiple assessments of a single patient or taped interview on the basis of biostatistical and clinical criteria that determine whether the ratings of any given examiner are appreciably higher or lower than the group average.30 Agreement was excellent for both the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (96 percent agreement; range, 94 to 96 percent across subscales) and the Heinrichs–Carpenter Quality-of-Life Scale (95 percent agreement; range, 90 to 98 percent across subscales).

Assessment of Costs

Health Care Costs

Health care costs were estimated by multiplying the number of units of service (e.g., inpatient days or outpatient visits) for each patient by the estimated unit costs, according to cost data for fiscal year 1994. To estimate the unit costs at each center for general psychiatric and substance-abuse care of inpatients and outpatients, including group treatment and day hospital care, the total expenditures for each service were divided by the total number of units of service provided at the center.31-33 The costs of Veterans Affairs medical, surgical, domiciliary, and nursing home care and of outpatient treatment for non-mental problems were estimated from national average costs. Non–Veterans Affairs health care costs were minimal (less than 2 percent of all costs) and were estimated on the basis of a recent study that compared Veterans Affairs and non–Veterans Affairs medical costs in various communities.34

Use of Services

Data on the use of Veterans Affairs health services were derived from national automated Veterans Affairs data systems. Use of non–Veterans Affairs services was evaluated by monthly interviews with patients and validated by reviews of treatment records from non–Veterans Affairs providers.

The costs of the medications used in the study were estimated on the basis of Veterans Affairs pharmacy costs of $2.13 per 100 mg for clozapine and $0.02 per 5 mg for haloperidol. The costs of drawing blood, performing white-cell counts, and additional pharmacy processing were added to the weekly cost of clozapine ($14 per week). Since the double-blind design artificially inflated the cost of haloperidol treatment by requiring weekly clinic visits and blood counts, the costs of outpatient care for patients receiving haloperidol — but not the outpatient utilization data — were decreased to 73 percent of their actual value, on the basis of an analysis of use of outpatient services before study entry.

Non–Health Care Costs

Interview data were used to estimate the use of services other than health care. The costs of these services were derived from interview data and published literature.35-38 These costs included the costs of the criminal-justice system (such as police contacts and arrests),36,37 loss of productivity (estimated on the basis of earnings from employment, included as negative costs), family burden (days lost by family members from work and from unpaid domestic activity because of caring for the patient, valued at twice the minimum wage),39 and the administrative costs of transfer payments — that is, of programs that provide public support such as welfare and disability payments to patients.35,36 For transfer payments, only administrative costs were included, because only they represent the consumption of society's resources.35 Although the full value of transfer payments may have a substantial impact on governmental budgets, we did not analyze the data from the governmental perspective.

Summary Costs

Cost data were summarized and analyzed from two perspectives: that of the entire health care system (Veterans Affairs and non–Veterans Affairs) and that of society (health care and non–health care costs).

Statistical Analysis

The primary analyses for this study are based on intention-to-treat principles that include all subjects randomized. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate differences in the proportion of patients in each group who had significant clinical improvement.

To maximize statistical power for testing hypotheses involving longitudinal data, we analyzed the primary outcomes with random-effects regression models,40 using the PROC MIXED program from the statistical computer package SAS, version 6.12. These models accommodate correlations among repeated observations and therefore allow the inclusion of subjects with missing observations. The significance of differences between treatment groups was tested by the likelihood-ratio chi-square test. Specifically, we compared a model that included the effects of time, time squared, and treatment group with a model that added interactions of group and time. The interaction of group and time is the hypothesis of interest.

A number of patients discontinued the assigned study medication because of lack of efficacy, adverse effects, or non–drug-related reasons and received open-label clozapine, haloperidol, or another standard medication on the basis of individual needs. The treatment groups were compared both as randomized (according to intention to treat) and with crossover cases excluded. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Study Sample and Treatment

Table 1Table 1Base-Line Characteristics of the Patients According to Treatment Assignment. shows that the patients randomly assigned to receive clozapine (n = 205) and those assigned to receive haloperidol (n = 218) had similar sociodemographic and clinical characteristics at base line. At the midpoint of the trial (26 weeks), the average (±SD) dose of clozapine was 552±229 mg per day, and the average dose of haloperidol was 28 ± 5.3 mg per day.

Compliance

Survival analysis showed a significantly longer period of compliance with the study protocol among the patients assigned to clozapine. Among the patients assigned to clozapine, 117 (57 percent) continued the randomized, blinded treatment for the entire year, as compared with 61 of the patients assigned to haloperidol (28 percent, P<0.001). The primary reasons for discontinuation differed between the groups. Fifty-one percent of the patients who discontinued haloperidol treatment, but only 15 percent of those who discontinued clozapine treatment, stopped taking the medication because of lack of efficacy or worsening of symptoms (P<0.001). The primary reasons for discontinuing clozapine treatment were side effects (30 percent of those who discontinued clozapine treatment vs. 17 percent of those who discontinued haloperidol treatment) or non–drug-related reasons, such as not wanting to continue the trial (55 percent of those who discontinued clozapine treatment vs. 32 percent of those who discontinued haloperidol treatment).

Outcomes

Altogether, 82 percent of the planned outcome assessments were completed. Analysis of the patients as randomized (intention-to-treat analysis) showed 5.4 percent lower symptom levels (i.e., greater clinical improvement) in all follow-up periods for the patients assigned to clozapine (mean score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, 79.1 for clozapine vs. 83.6 for haloperidol; P = 0.02). Superior improvement in the clozapine group was observed for both positive symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions (mean score, 19.5 vs. 21.2; P = 0.04) and negative symptoms, such as blunted affect and withdrawal (20.9 vs. 21.2, P = 0.02), although the differences were small. Table 2Table 2Number of Patients with Clinically Important Improvement at Various Times after the Initiation of Treatment. shows the symptom scores for the two groups according to the length of treatment. After six weeks and six months of treatment, significantly more patients assigned to clozapine had a clinically important improvement (at least 20 percent) in symptoms than those assigned to haloperidol. The differences between the groups were not significant at other times.

Although the group means for all follow-up points for the patients assigned to clozapine were 8.6 percent higher (44.4 vs. 40.9) on the Quality-of-Life Scale (in which higher scores reflect better quality of life), improvement over time was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.17), and there were no significant differences in the proportion of patients with clinically significant improvement (at least 20 percent) at the times examined (Table 2).

Clozapine was associated with markedly greater reductions on the tardive-dyskinesia scale over time, with mean scores for all follow-up points of 3.6 for clozapine and 5.2 for haloperidol (P = 0.005), as compared with 5.9 and 5.8, respectively, at base line. Clozapine also was associated with a marked reduction in akathisia (mean score, 2.6, vs. 4.0 for haloperidol; P<0.001) and in extrapyramidal symptoms (2.6 vs. 4.0, P<0.001).

As compared with patients assigned to haloperidol, those assigned to clozapine had, on the average, 24.3 fewer days in the hospital for psychiatric reasons in a year (143.8 vs. 168.1, P=0.03) and 35.7 more units of outpatient service (133.6 vs. 97.9, P = 0.03), a difference predominantly reflecting additional visits for professional services (Table 3Table 3One-Year Use and Cost Data According to Treatment Assignment.). The total per capita cost of health care was high: $57,785 in the clozapine group and $60,226 in the haloperidol group (P = 0.39). The total per capita costs to society were similar to the health care costs: $58,151 in the clozapine group and $60,885 in the haloperidol group (P = 0.41). Outpatient treatment was substantially more costly for patients assigned to clozapine than for patients assigned to haloperidol ($8,473 vs. $3,474 per capita, P<0.001). The per capita cost of antipsychotic drugs was $3,199 in the clozapine group and $367 in the haloperidol group (P<0.001). However, this difference was offset by the decrease in the cost of inpatient hospital days for psychiatric care in the clozapine group ($45,247 vs. $53,931, P = 0.01). Non–health care costs were much smaller than health care costs, because few of these severely disabled patients worked for pay, few were involved with the criminal-justice system, and only the administrative costs related to transfer payments were counted as costs.

Crossovers

During the study, some patients stopped taking the assigned medication because of lack of efficacy, adverse effects, or other reasons. Eighty-three patients assigned to clozapine (40 percent) switched to haloperidol or other standard antipsychotic drugs during the follow-up period, and 49 patients assigned to haloperidol (22 percent) received clozapine for four weeks or more. Since the inclusion of these crossover patients in our analyses might have caused us to underestimate the effectiveness of clozapine, secondary analyses were conducted in which these crossover cases were excluded. Of the 157 patients assigned to haloperidol who interrupted the blinded treatment, all but the 49 who crossed over to clozapine continued to receive conventional antipsychotic medication (including open-label haloperidol) and were therefore classified as having completed haloperidol treatment for the purposes of the secondary analyses.

Patients who crossed over to another drug and those who completed the year of therapy with their assigned drugs differed significantly in only one base-line measure, quality of life (P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in base-line measures between treatment groups among patients who completed their assigned treatments.

Longitudinal symptom ratings (total scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) are shown according to crossover status in Figure 1Figure 1Symptom Outcomes (Total Scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) among Patients Assigned to Clozapine or Haloperidol, According to Whether They Completed Treatment or Crossed Over to the Other Treatment.. Among patients who completed their assigned treatment, those who received clozapine had a substantially greater reduction in symptoms than those who received haloperidol or another conventional medication (P = 0.005). Among patients who crossed over, those assigned to clozapine who later switched to haloperidol or another conventional antipsychotic medication had an initial decrease in symptoms (while receiving clozapine) but then had increased symptoms (after the crossover). Patients assigned to haloperidol who switched to clozapine had fewer symptoms after the crossover.

Similar data for the Quality-of-Life Scale are presented in Figure 2Figure 2Quality-of-Life Outcomes (Total Scores on the Heinrichs–Carpenter Scale) among Patients Assigned to Clozapine or Haloperidol, According to Whether They Completed Treatment or Crossed Over to the Other Treatment.. Among patients who completed their assigned treatment, there was a significant benefit from clozapine (P = 0.003). The numbers of patients with greater than 20 percent improvement in symptoms and quality of life are shown in Table 2.

Leukopenia and Agranulocytosis

Leukopenia (white-cell count, less than 3000 per cubic millimeter) developed in four patients while they were taking clozapine and in two patients while they were taking haloperidol. Neutropenia (granulocyte count, less than 1500 per cubic millimeter) developed in eight patients while they were taking clozapine and nine patients while they were taking haloperidol. Agranulocytosis developed in three patients while they were taking clozapine, all of whom recovered fully after they stopped taking the drug.

Discussion

We found that clozapine was somewhat more effective than haloperidol for the treatment of symptoms associated with refractory schizophrenia; clozapine was associated with fewer extrapyramidal effects than haloperidol, and the greater cost of clozapine was offset by reductions in the number of days spent in the hospital. Although our analysis of patients as randomized showed no effect of clozapine on the quality of life, this analysis probably underestimated the effectiveness of the drug, because of crossovers. When crossovers were excluded, clozapine was found to have a marked effect on both symptoms and the quality of life.

The clinical benefits and cost savings associated with clozapine were less pronounced than in previous studies. In a multicenter trial of 248 patients, Kane et al.4 found that after six weeks, 38 percent of the patients taking clozapine showed clinically important improvement, as compared with only 5 percent of controls taking chlorpromazine. Other investigators have also reported improvement in 30 to 60 percent of patients with refractory schizophrenia taking clozapine.5-7 Among the patients taking clozapine in the current study, clinically important improvement occurred in 24 percent after six weeks and in 37 percent after one year. However, clinically important improvement also occurred in 13 percent of the patients taking haloperidol or another standard medication after six weeks and in 32 percent of these patients after one year.

Differences in patients' characteristics (our patients were older male veterans) and treatment settings (all treatment in our study was provided at Veterans Affairs facilities) are two possible reasons we did not replicate the findings of other studies. However, age has not been identified as a predictor of response to clozapine, and in one study men benefited more than women.6 The institutional context does not seem to provide an explanation, since a large proportion of the subjects in the study by Kane et al.4 were also treated in Veterans Affairs hospitals.

It is notable that a recent two-year randomized trial of clozapine in long-term patients in state hospitals20 found no effect of the medication on either symptoms or quality of life. The patients in that study were less severely ill than in other studies, with base-line symptom scores on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale of only 43, as compared with mean scores of 52 in our study and 61 in the study by Kane et al.4 This comparison suggests that the beneficial effect of clozapine may be less strong among patients with less severe symptoms according to the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.

The contrast between our finding of a limited effect of clozapine on quality of life and costs and the results of previous studies is easier to explain. Most earlier studies did not include randomly assigned control groups, typically enrolled patients after serious relapses, and used pretreatment status for comparison.10,13,17-19 Like others,11 we observed a steady increase in the quality of life among patients treated with clozapine, but improvement was also seen in patients treated with haloperidol and other standard medications.

We confirmed previous reports of far lower rates of extrapyramidal side effects with clozapine than with conventional antipsychotic medications. Its lower rate of side effects and its greater effectiveness are probably the principal reasons for the better compliance of patients assigned to clozapine in this study than among those assigned to haloperidol.

As in previous studies, there were few instances of agranulocytosis. These were readily identified by white-cell monitoring and resolved after clozapine was discontinued. The costs of treating agranulocytosis were limited to the cost of three to seven additional hospital days.

We conclude that among patients with refractory schizophrenia and high levels of hospital use, clozapine was somewhat more effective than standard treatments, had fewer side effects, and did not increase the total cost of care. Although patients receiving clozapine had higher costs for medication and outpatient care, they spent fewer days in the hospital and therefore had lower inpatient costs.

Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service. Clozapine and matching placebos were provided by Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, a division of Novartis Corporation.

We are indebted to John Feussner, M.D., Daniel Deykin, M.D., Shirley Meehan, Ph.D., Charles Welch, Ph.D., Joseph Gough, Janet Gold, and Ping Huang, Ph.D., of the Department of Veterans Affairs Research Office for their support; to Lois Ucas, J. Cahill, and D. Thompson of the Chairman's Office; to Amy Smith, Jeff Parker, Michael Kelley, and Shenglin Wang of the Cooperative Studies in Health Services Coordinating Center; to Bill Gagne, Loretta Guidarelli, and Mike Sather of the Pharmacy Coordinating Center; and to David Garver, M.D., Gary Ripper, and Stephanie Todd of the National Veterans Affairs Clozapine Coordinating Center.

Source Information

From the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, and the Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. (R.R., J.C., L.F., D.C.); the Center for Cooperative Studies in Health Services, Hines Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Hines, Ill. (W.X., J.T., W.H.); and the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, N.M. (C.F.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Rosenheck at the Northeast Program Evaluation Center (182), VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Ave., West Haven, CT 06516.

Members of the study group are listed in the Appendix.

Appendix

The following investigators were responsible for the conduct of the study at their respective Veterans Affairs facilities: J. Grabowski (principal investigator), L. Alphs, A. Pizzuti, and R. Wancha, Allen Park, Mich.; D. Evans (principal investigator), P.Y. Puczkowski, J. Martin, and M. Brandsma, Augusta, Ga.; L. Herz (principal investigator), M. Avtges, R. Smith, T. Phillips, and J. Di Vicenzo, Bedford, Mass.; G. Jurjus (principal investigator), K.Y. Kwon (co-investigator), C. Faust, K. Brown, and M. Manuel, Brecksville, Ohio; S. Chang (principal investigator), J.D. Wojcik, and C.D. Kohberger, Brockton, Mass.; L. Dunn (principal investigator), M. Evans, A. Bush, and S. Bennett, Durham, N.C.; J.C. Crayton (principal investigator), K.F. Foley, S. Neafsey, and S. Sideman, Hines, Ill.; W.B. Lawson (principal investigator), P. Arnold, M. Edmison, and M.M. Storey, Little Rock, Ark.; Y. Choe (principal investigator), D. Broad, E. Waterbury, and E. Cabezon, Lyons, N.J.; R. Douyon (principal investigator), M. Miller, J. Hamel, S. Kerr, and D. Feenane, Miami; E. Allen (principal investigator), K. Wainwright, and D. Widmer, Montrose, N.Y.; J. Lauriello (principal investigator), S. Whistance, J. Breen, and M. Getty, Palo Alto, Calif.; M. Peszke (principal investigator), M. Castiglione, and J. Frock, Perry Point, Md.; J.L. Peters (principal investigator), N. Snyder, D. Stefanik, and K. Henry, Pittsburgh; J. Tekell (principal investigator), B. Tobey, D. Hall, and E. Kyle, San Antonio, Tex.; and J. Erdos (principal investigator), D. Miles, A. Genovese, and D. Soliwoda, West Haven, Conn. The members of the Data Monitoring Board were A. Breier, H. Goldman, J. Klett, and D. Pickar. The members of the Executive Committee were B. Astrachan and W. Hargreaves, as well as the authors. D. Hedeker provided statistical review.

References

References

  1. 1

    Bromet EJ, Dew MA, Eaton W. Epidemiology of psychosis with special reference to schizophrenia. In: Tsuang MT, Tohen M, Zahner GEP, eds. Textbook in psychiatric epidemiology. New York: John Wiley, 1996:283-300.

  2. 2

    Rupp A, Keith SJ. The costs of schizophrenia: assessing the burden. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1993;16:413-423
    Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Kane JM, Marder SR. Psychopharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1993;19:287-302
    Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Kane JM, Honigfeld G, Singer J, Meltzer HY, Clozaril Collaborative Study Group. Clozapine for the treatment-resistant schizophrenic: a double-blind comparison with chlorpromazine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:789-796
    Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Breier A, Buchanan RW, Kirkpatrick B, et al. Effects of clozapine on positive and negative symptoms in outpatients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151:20-26
    Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Lieberman JA, Safferman AZ, Pollack S, et al. Clinical effects of clozapine in chronic schizophrenia: response to treatment and predictors of outcome. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151:1744-1752
    Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Pickar D, Ownen RR, Litman RE, Konicki E, Gutierrez R, Rapaport MH. Clinical and biologic response to clozapine in patients with schizophrenia: crossover comparison with fluphenazine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:345-353
    Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Buchanan RW. Clozapine: efficacy and safety. Schizophr Bull 1995;21:579-591
    Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Carpenter WT Jr, Conley RR, Buchanan RW, Breier A, Tamminga CA. Patient response and resource management: another view of clozapine treatment of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:827-832
    Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Breier A, Buchanan RW, Irish D, Carpenter WT Jr. Clozapine treatment of outpatients with schizophrenia: outcome and long-term response patterns. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1993;44:1145-1149
    Medline

  11. 11

    Meltzer HY, Burnett S, Bastani B, Ramirez LF. Effects of six months of clozapine treatment on the quality of life of chronic schizophrenic patients. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1990;41:892-897
    Medline

  12. 12

    Meltzer HY. Clozapine: is another view valid? Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:821-825
    Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Marder SR. Adverse effects of clozapine. J Clin Psychiatry Monogr Ser 1996;14:11-12

  14. 14

    Griffith RW, Saameli J. Clozapine and agranulocytosis. Lancet 1975;2:657-657
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Alvir JMJ, Lieberman JA, Safferman AZ, Schwimmer JL, Schaaf JA. Clozapine-induced agranulocytosis: incidence and risk factors in the United States. N Engl J Med 1993;329:162-167
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Meltzer HY, Cola PA. The pharmacoeconomics of clozapine: a review. J Clin Psychiatry 1994;55:Suppl B:161-165
    Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Revicki DA, Luce BR, Weschler JM, Brown RE, Adler MA. Cost-effectiveness of clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1990;41:850-854
    Medline

  18. 18

    Meltzer HY, Cola P, Way L, et al. Cost effectiveness of clozapine in neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150:1630-1638
    Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Reid WH, Mason M, Toprac M. Savings in hospital bed-days related to treatment with clozapine. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1994;45:261-264
    Medline

  20. 20

    Essock SM, Hargreaves WA, Covell NH, Goethe J. Clozapine's effectiveness for patients in state hospitals: results from a randomized trial. Psychopharmacol Bull 1996;32:683-697
    Medline

  21. 21

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-III-R. 3rd ed., rev. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, 1987.

  22. 22

    Spitzer RS, Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First MB. User's guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R: SCID. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press, 1990.

  23. 23

    Overall JE, Gorham DR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychol Rep 1962;10:799-812
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  24. 24

    Guy W. Clinical global impression. In: Guy W, ed. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rockville, Md.: National Institute of Mental Health, 1976:218-21. (DHEW publication no. ADM 76-338.)

  25. 25

    Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1987;13:261-276
    Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Heinrichs DW, Hanlon ET, Carpenter WT Jr. The Quality of Life Scale: an instrument for rating the schizophrenic deficit syndrome. Schizophr Bull 1984;10:388-398
    Web of Science | Medline

  27. 27

    Barnes TRE. A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia. Br J Psychiatry 1989;154:672-676
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Guy W. Abnormal involuntary movements. In: Guy W, ed. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rockville, Md.: National Institute of Mental Health, 1976. (DHEW publication no. ADM 76-338.)

  29. 29

    Simpson GM, Angus JWS. A rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1970;212:11-19
    CrossRef | Medline

  30. 30

    Cicchetti DV, Showalter D, Rosenheck RA. A new method for assessing interexaminer agreement when multiple ratings are made on a single subject: applications to the assessment of neuropsychiatric symptomatology. Psychiatry Res (in press).

  31. 31

    Rosenheck RA, Neale M, Leaf P, Milstein R, Frisman L. Multisite experimental cost study of intensive psychiatric community care. Schizophr Bull 1995;21:129-140
    Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Rosenheck R, Frisman L, Neale M. Estimating the capital component of mental health care costs in the public sector. Admin Policy Mental Health 1994;21:493-509
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  33. 33

    Rosenheck RA, Neale M, Frisman L. Issues in estimating the cost of innovative mental health programs. Psychiatr Q 1995;66:9-31
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    Comparison of costs and outcomes of matched pairs of VAMCs and their university affiliates. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Inspector General, 1992.

  35. 35

    Frisman LK, Rosenheck RA. How transfer payments are treated in cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis. Adm Policy Mental Health 1996;23:533-546
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  36. 36

    Schobel BD. Administrative expenses under OASDI. Soc Secur Bull 1981;44:21-28
    Medline

  37. 37

    Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Justice expenditures and employment in the United States, 1988. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1991. (Publication no. NCJ-125619.)

  38. 38

    Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics — 1990. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1991. (Publication no. NCJ-130580.)

  39. 39

    Tessler R, Gamache G. Continuity of care, residence and family burden in Ohio. Milbank Q 1994;72:149-169
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  40. 40

    Gibbons RD, Hedeker D, Elkin I, et al. Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data: application to the NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program dataset. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993;50:739-750
    Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (144)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Marianne Klemp, Ingunn Fride Tvete, Tor Skomedal, Jørund Gaasemyr, Bent Natvig, Ivar Aursnes. (2011) A Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Adverse Effects of 4 Atypical Neuroleptic Drugs Compared With Haloperidol and Placebo. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 31:6, 698-704
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    T. Suzuki, G. Remington, T. Arenovich, H. Uchida, O. Agid, A. Graff-Guerrero, D. C. Mamo. (2011) Time course of improvement with antipsychotic medication in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The British Journal of Psychiatry 199:4, 275-280
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Takefumi Suzuki, Gary Remington, Benoit H. Mulsant, Tarek K. Rajji, Hiroyuki Uchida, Ariel Graff-Guerrero, David C. Mamo. (2011) Treatment resistant schizophrenia and response to antipsychotics: A review. Schizophrenia Research
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    F Mouaffak, O Kebir, M Chayet, S Tordjman, M N Vacheron, B Millet, N Jaafari, A Bellon, J P Olié, M-O Krebs. (2011) Association of Disrupted in Schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) missense variants with ultra-resistant schizophrenia. The Pharmacogenomics Journal 11:4, 267-273
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Corrado Barbui, Simone Accordini, Michela Nosè, Scott Stroup, Marianna Purgato, Francesca Girlanda, Eleonora Esposito, Antonio Veronese, Michele Tansella, Andrea Cipriani. (2011) Aripiprazole Versus Haloperidol in Combination With Clozapine for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia in Routine Clinical Care. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 31:3, 266-273
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Stefan Leucht, Stephan Heres, Werner Kissling, John M. Davis. (2011) Evidence-based pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 14:02, 269-284
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Fayçal Mouaffak, Oussama Kebir, Alfredo Bellon, Raphael Gourevitch, Sylvie Tordjman, Annie Viala, Bruno Millet, Nematollah Jaafari, Jean Pierre Olié, Marie Odile Krebs. (2011) Association of an UCP4 (SLC25A27) haplotype with ultra-resistant schizophrenia. Pharmacogenomics 12:2, 185-193
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Katja Komossa, Christine Rummel-Kluge, Sandra Schwarz, Franziska Schmid, Heike Hunger, Werner Kissling, Stefan Leucht, Katja Komossa. 2011. Risperidone versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. .
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    María Barceló, Enrique Raviña, María J. Varela, José Brea, María I. Loza, Christian F. Masaguer. (2011) Potential atypical antipsychotics: synthesis, binding affinity and SAR of new heterocyclic bioisosteric butyrophenone analogues as multitarget ligands. MedChemComm
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Stephan Leucht, Christoph U. Correll, John M. Kane. 2010. Approaches to Treatment-Resistant Patients. , 540-560.
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Nancy H. Covell, Susan M. Essock, Linda K. Frisman. 2010. Economics of the Treatment of Schizophrenia. , 687-699.
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Elaine Weiner, Robert R Conley, M Patricia Ball, Stephanie Feldman, James M Gold, Deanna L Kelly, Ikwunga Wonodi, Robert P McMahon, Robert W Buchanan. (2010) Adjunctive Risperidone for Partially Responsive People with Schizophrenia Treated with Clozapine. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:11, 2274-2283
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Monica M. Marcus, Charlotte Wiker, Olivia Frånberg, Åsa Konradsson-Geuken, Xavier Langlois, Kent Jardemark, Torgny H. Svensson. (2010) Adjunctive α2-adrenoceptor blockade enhances the antipsychotic-like effect of risperidone and facilitates cortical dopaminergic and glutamatergic, NMDA receptor-mediated transmission. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 13:07, 891-903
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Herbert Y. Meltzer, William V. Bobo, Myung A. Lee, Philip Cola, Karuna Jayathilake. (2010) A randomized trial comparing clozapine and typical neuroleptic drugs in non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 177:3, 286-293
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Katja Komossa, Christine Rummel-Kluge, Heike Hunger, Franziska Schmid, Sandra Schwarz, Lorna Duggan, Werner Kissling, Stefan Leucht, Katja Komossa. 2010. Olanzapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. .
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Katja Komossa, Christine Rummel-Kluge, Heike Hunger, Franziska Schmid, Sandra Schwarz, Werner Kissling, Stefan Leucht, Katja Komossa. 2010. Zotepine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. .
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Lingjun Zuo, Xingguang Luo, Henry R. Kranzler, Lingeng Lu, Robert A. Rosenheck, Joyce Cramer, Daniel P. van Kammen, Joseph Erdos, Dennis S. Charney, John Krystal, Joel Gelernter. (2009) Association study of DTNBP1 with schizophrenia in a US sample. Psychiatric Genetics 19:6, 292-304
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Laura Carro, Enrique Raviña, Eduardo Domínguez, José Brea, María I. Loza, Christian F. Masaguer. (2009) Synthesis and binding affinity of potential atypical antipsychotics with the tetrahydroquinazolinone motif. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 19:21, 6059-6062
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    S. Leucht, W. Kissling, J. M. Davis. (2009) Second-generation antipsychotics for schizophrenia: can we resolve the conflict?. Psychological Medicine 39:10, 1591
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Samuel I. Miles. 2009. Psychopharmacology. .
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Stefan Leucht, Caroline Corves, Werner Kissling, John M Davis. 2009. An update of meta-analyses on second-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia. , 164-173.
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Andrea Cipriani, Marianna Boso, Corrado Barbui, Andrea Cipriani. 2009. Clozapine combined with different antipsychotic drugs for treatment resistant schizophrenia. .
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    J. Rabinowitz, S. Z. Levine, O. Barkai, O. Davidov. (2009) Dropout Rates in Randomized Clinical Trials of Antipsychotics: A Meta-analysis Comparing First- and Second-Generation Drugs and an Examination of the Role of Trial Design Features. Schizophrenia Bulletin 35:4, 775-788
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Lingjun Zuo, Xingguang Luo, Jennifer B. Listman, Henry R. Kranzler, Shuang Wang, Raymond F. Anton, Hilary P. Blumberg, Murray B. Stein, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Jonathan Covault, Dennis S. Charney, Daniel P. Kammen, Lawrence H. Price, Jaakko Lappalainen, Joyce Cramer, John H. Krystal, Joel Gelernter. (2009) Population admixture modulates risk for alcohol dependence. Human Genetics 125:5-6, 605-613
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Lingjun Zuo, Xingguang Luo, John H. Krystal, Joyce Cramer, Dennis S. Charney, Joel Gelernter. (2009) The efficacies of clozapine and haloperidol in refractory schizophrenia are related to DTNBP1 variation. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics 19:6, 437-446
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    C. Barbui, A. Signoretti, S. Mule, M. Boso, A. Cipriani. (2009) Does the Addition of a Second Antipsychotic Drug Improve Clozapine Treatment?. Schizophrenia Bulletin 35:2, 458-468
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Adib Essali, Nahla Al-Haj Haasan, Chunbo Li, John Rathbone, Adib Essali. 2009. Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia. .
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Stefan Leucht, Caroline Corves, Dieter Arbter, Rolf R Engel, Chunbo Li, John M Davis. (2009) Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. The Lancet 373:9657, 31-41
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Thomas J. Raedler, Kim Hinkelmann, Klaus Wiedemann. (2008) Variability of the In Vivo Metabolism of Clozapine. Clinical Neuropharmacology 31:6, 347-352
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    William G. Henderson, Philip W. Lavori, Peter Peduzzi, Joseph F. Collins, Mike R. Sather, John R. Feussner. 2008. Cooperative Studies Program, US Department of Veterans Affairs. .
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    CAROLINE BONHAM, CHRISTOPHER ABBOTT. (2008) Are Second Generation Antipsychotics a Distinct Class?. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 14:4, 225-231
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Linda M. Davies, Thomas R.E. Barnes, Peter B. Jones, Shôn Lewis, Fiona Gaughran, Karen Hayhurst, Alison Markwick, Helen Lloyd. (2008) A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Cost-Utility of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in People with Psychosis and Eligible for Clozapine. Value in Health 11:4, 549-562
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Lawrence James Albers, Alessandro Musenga, Maria Augusta Raggi. (2008) Iloperidone: a new benzisoxazole atypical antipsychotic drug. Is it novel enough to impact the crowded atypical antipsychotic market?. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 17:1, 61-75
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Ingrid Sibitz, Michaela Amering, Ralf Gössler, Annemarie Unger, Heinz Katschnig. (2007) Patients’ perspectives on what works in psychoeducational groups for schizophrenia. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 42:11, 909-915
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    María Barceló, Enrique Raviña, Christian F. Masaguer, Eduardo Domínguez, Filipe Miguel Areias, José Brea, María I. Loza. (2007) Synthesis and binding affinity of new pyrazole and isoxazole derivatives as potential atypical antipsychotics. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 17:17, 4873-4877
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Ofer Agid, Gary Remington, Shitij Kapur, Tamara Arenovich, Robert B. Zipursky. (2007) Early Use of Clozapine for Poorly Responding First-Episode Psychosis. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 27:4, 369-373
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    David Taylor, Karen Hayhurst, Robert Kerwin. (2007) A controlled, mirror-image study of second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 22:3, 133-136
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Marianna Boso, Andrea Cipriani, Corrado Barbui, Andrea Cipriani. 2007. Clozapine combined with different antipsychotic drugs for treatment resistant schizophrenia. .
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    PETER J. WEIDEN. (2007) EPS Profiles: The Atypical Antipsychotics. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 13:1, 13-24
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    F. Limosin. (2006) Apport des antipsychotiques atypiques dans la prise en charge à long terme de la schizophrénie. L'Encéphale 32:6, 1065-1071
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    W. W. Fleischhacker, M. Hummer. (2006) Pharmakotherapie der Schizophrenie. Der Nervenarzt 77:S03, S77-S98
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Takahide Taniguchi, Satsuki Sumitani, Michitaka Aono, Junichi Iga, Sawako Kinouchi, Hirosi Aki, Mami Matsushita, Kyoko Taniguchi, Mami Tsuno, Kazunari Yamanishi, Masahito Tomotake, Yasuhiro Kaneda, Tetsuro Ohmori. (2006) Effect of antipsychotic replacement with quetiapine on the symptoms and quality of life of schizophrenic patients with extrapyramidal symptoms. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 21:7, 439-445
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Mohammad Arif, Md. Mahiuddin Ahmed, Yukiko Kumabe, Hajime Hoshino, Toshiyuki Chikuma, Takeshi Kato. (2006) Clozapine but not haloperidol suppresses the changes in the levels of neuropeptides in MK-801-treated rat brain regions. Neurochemistry International 49:3, 304-311
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Greg A. Greenberg, Robert A. Rosenheck. (2006) USE OF NATIONWIDE OUTCOMES MONITORING DATA TO COMPARE CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN SPECIALIZED MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS AND GENERAL PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS IN THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION. Psychiatric Quarterly 77:2, 151-172
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Alex J. Mitchell. (2006) High Medication Discontinuation Rates in Psychiatry. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 26:2, 109-112
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Sandra L. Tunis, Douglas E. Faries, Allen W. Nyhuis, Bruce J. Kinon, Haya Ascher-Svanum, Ralph Aquila. (2006) Cost-Effectiveness of Olanzapine as First-Line Treatment for Schizophrenia: Results from a Randomized, Open-Label, 1-Year Trial. Value in Health 9:2, 77-89
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Honer, William G., Thornton, Allen E., Chen, Eric Y.H., Chan, Raymond C.K., Wong, Jessica O.Y., Bergmann, Andrea, Falkai, Peter, Pomarol-Clotet, Edith, McKenna, Peter J., Stip, Emmanuel, Williams, Richard, MacEwan, G. William, Wasan, Kishor, Procyshyn, Ric, . (2006) Clozapine Alone versus Clozapine and Risperidone with Refractory Schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine 354:5, 472-482
    Full Text

  48. 48

    Mario Alvarado, María Barceló, Laura Carro, Christian F. Masaguer, Enrique Raviña. (2006) Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of New Quinazoline and Cinnoline Derivatives as Potential Atypical Antipsychotics. Chemistry & Biodiversity 3:1, 106-117
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    José Luis R. Martin, Víctor Pérez, Montse Sacristán, Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo, Cristóbal Martínez, Enric Álvarez. (2006) Meta-analysis of drop-out rates in randomised clinical trials, comparing typical and atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. European Psychiatry 21:1, 11-20
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    David Salkever, Eric Slade, Mustafa Karakus. (2006) Differential Effects of Atypical versus Typical Antipsychotic Medication on Earnings of Schizophrenia Patients. PharmacoEconomics 24:2, 123-139
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Peter Falkai, Thomas Wobrock, Jeffrey Lieberman, Birte Glenthoj, Wagner F. Gattaz, Hans-Jürgen Möller, WFSBP Task Force on Treatment Guide, Peter Falkai, Thomas Wobrock, Jeffrey Lieberman, Birte Glenthoj, Wagner F. Gattaz, Hans-Jürgen Möller, WFSBP Task Force on Treatment Guide. (2006) World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, Part 2: Long-term treatment of schizophrenia. World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 7:1, 5-40
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    S. W. Lewis, T. R. E. Barnes, L. Davies, R. M. Murray, G. Dunn, K. P. Hayhurst, A. Markwick, H. Lloyd, P. B. Jones. (2005) Randomized Controlled Trial of Effect of Prescription of Clozapine Versus Other Second-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs in Resistant Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32:4, 715-723
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Roy H. Perlis, David A. Ganz, Jerry Avorn, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Robert J. Glynn, Jordan W. Smoller, Philip S. Wang. (2005) Pharmacogenetic Testing in the Clinical Management of Schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 25:5, 427-434
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Philip E. Lee, Kathy Sykora, Sudeep S. Gill, Muhammad Mamdani, C. Marras, Geoff Anderson, Ken I. Shulman, Thérèse Stukel, Sharon-Lise Normand, Paula A. Rochon. (2005) Antipsychotic Medications and Drug-Induced Movement Disorders Other Than Parkinsonism: A Population-Based Cohort Study in Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53:8, 1374-1379
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    William G. Henderson, Philip W. Lavori, Peter Peduzzi, Joseph F. Collins, Mike R. Sather, John R. Feussner. 2005. Cooperative Studies Program, US Department of Veterans Affairs. .
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    A. James O'Malley, Sharon-Lise T. Normand. (2005) Likelihood Methods for Treatment Noncompliance and Subsequent Nonresponse in Randomized Trials. Biometrics 61:2, 325-334
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Steven L Scott, Gareth M James, Catherine A Sugar. (2005) Hidden Markov Models for Longitudinal Comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100:470, 359-369
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Mario Alvarado, Alberto Coelho, Christian F. Masaguer, Enrique Raviña, José Brea, J. Fernando Padín, María I. Loza. (2005) Synthesis and binding affinity of novel 3-aminoethyl-1-tetralones, potential atypical antipsychotics. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15:12, 3063-3066
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    RICHARD G. FRANK, RENA M. CONTI, HOWARD H. GOLDMAN. (2005) Mental Health Policy and Psychotropic Drugs. The Milbank Quarterly 83:2, 271-298
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Richard A. Van Dorn, Jeffrey W. Swanson, Marvin S. Swartz, Eric B. Elbogen. (2005) The Effects of Race and Criminal Justice Involvement on Access to Atypical Antipsychotic Medications Among Persons with Schizophrenia. Mental Health Services Research 7:2, 123-134
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Hsien-Yuan Lane, Cheng-Chun Lee, Yi-Ching Liu, Wen-Ho Chang. (2005) Pharmacogenetic studies of response to risperidone and other newer atypical antipsychotics. Pharmacogenomics 6:2, 139-149
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    J. M. Haro, E. T. Edgell, D. Novick, J. Alonso, L. Kennedy, P. B. Jones, M. Ratcliffe, A. Breier, . (2005) Effectiveness of antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia: 6-month results of the Pan-European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 111:3, 220-231
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    P SACHDEV. (2005) Neuroleptic-induced Movement Disorders: An Overview. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 28:1, 255-274
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Reinhold Kilian, Thomas Becker. (2005) Impact of antipsychotic medication on the cost of schizophrenia. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 5:1, 39-57
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    D. Naber, M. Riedel, A. Klimke, E.-U. Vorbach, M. Lambert, K.-U. Kuhn, S. Bender, B. Bandelow, W. Lemmer, S. Moritz, R. W. Dittmann. (2005) Randomized double blind comparison of olanzapine vs. clozapine on subjective well-being and clinical outcome in patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 111:2, 106-115
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Anne Magnus, Vaughan Carr, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Rob Carter, Theo Vos. (2005) Assessing cost-effectiveness of drug interventions for schizophrenia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 39:1-2, 44-54
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Corrado Barbui, Camilla Lintas, Mauro Percudani. (2005) Head-To-Head Comparison of the Costs of Atypical Antipsychotics. CNS Drugs 19:11, 935-950
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Gary Remington, Amitabha Saha, Siow-Ann Chong, Chekkera Shammi. (2005) Augmentation Strategies in Clozapine-Resistant Schizophrenia. CNS Drugs 19:10, 843-872
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Michael Ritsner, Anatoly Gibel, Galina Perelroyzen, Rena Kurs, Mahmoud Jabarin, Yael Ratner. (2004) Quality of Life Outcomes of Risperidone, Olanzapine, and Typical Antipsychotics Among Schizophrenia Patients Treated in Routine Clinical Practice. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 24:6, 582-591
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Andrea Messori, Benedetta Santarlasci, Sabrina Trippoli, Monica Vaiani, Franca Vacca, M Chiara Brutti. (2004) Clinical-economic appropriateness of drug treatments: designing a method that combines evidence-based information and cost assessments to construct league tables accounting for the potential number of patients. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 5:11, 2381-2389
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    J P Lindenmayer, Anzalee Khan. (2004) Pharmacological treatment strategies for schizophrenia. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 4:4, 705-723
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Zhongyun Zhao. (2004) Economic outcomes associated with olanzapine versus risperidone in the treatment of uncontrolled schizophrenia. Current Medical Research and Opinion 20:7, 1039-1048
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Stephen Layton, Martin Barbeau. (2004) Generic replacement of clozapine: a simple decision model from a Canadian perspective. Current Medical Research and Opinion 20:4, 453-459
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Xingguang Luo, Henry Kranzler, Jaakko Lappalainen, Robert Rosenheck, Dennis Charney, Lingjun Zuo, Joseph Erdos, Daniel P. van Kammen, Joel Gelernter. (2004) CALCYON gene variation, schizophrenia, and cocaine dependence. American Journal of Medical Genetics 125B:1, 25-30
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Yolanda Caro, Marı́a Torrado, Christian F. Masaguer, Enrique Raviña, Fernando Padı́n, José Brea, Marı́a I. Loza. (2004) Chemoenzymatic synthesis and binding affinity of novel (R)- and (S)-3-aminomethyl-1-tetralones, potential atypical antipsychotics. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 14:3, 585-589
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Catherine A. Sugar, Gareth M. James, Leslie A. Lenert, Robert A. Rosenheck. (2004) Discrete State Analysis for Interpretation of Data From Clinical Trials. Medical Care 42:2, 183-196
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Xingguang Luo, Tim A Klempan, Jaakko Lappalainen, Robert A Rosenheck, Dennis S Charney, Joseph Erdos, Daniel P van Kammen, Henry R Kranzler, James L Kennedy, Joel Gelernter. (2004) NOTCH4 gene haplotype is associated with schizophrenia in African Americans. Biological Psychiatry 55:2, 112-117
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Mauro Percudani, Corrado Barbui, Michele Tansella. (2004) Effect of Second-Generation Antipsychotics on Employment and Productivity in Individuals with Schizophrenia. PharmacoEconomics 22:11, 701-718
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Aileen O??Brien. (2004) Starting Clozapine in the Community. CNS Drugs 18:13, 845-852
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Sandra L Tunis, Haya Ascher-Svanum, Michael Stensland, Bruce J Kinon. (2004) Assessing the Value of Antipsychotics for Treating Schizophrenia. PharmacoEconomics 22:1, 1-8
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    A George Awad, Lakshmi N P Voruganti. (2004) Impact of Atypical Antipsychotics on Quality of Life in Patients with Schizophrenia. CNS Drugs 18:13, 877-893
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    A LEHMAN, R BUCHANAN, F DICKERSON, L DIXON, R GOLDBERG, L GREENPADEN, J KREYENBUHL. (2003) Evidence-based treatment for schizophrenia. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 26:4, 939-954
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    P. B. d. A. Andreoli. (2003) A Systematic Review of Studies of the Cost-Effectiveness of Mental Health Consultation-Liaison Interventions in General Hospitals. Psychosomatics 44:6, 499-507
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Hsien-Yuan Lane, Yue-Cune Chang, Chieh-Liang Huang, Wen-Ho Chang. (2003) Refining pharmacogenetic research in schizophrenia: Control for patient-related variables. Drug Development Research 60:2, 164-171
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    S Leucht, J McGrath, W Kissling, Stefan Leucht. 2003. Lithium for schizophrenia. .
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Maria Carolina Hardoy, Mauro Giovanni Carta, Bernardo Carpiniello, Carlo Cianchetti, Socrate Congia, Immacolata D’Errico, Guido Emanuelli, Franco Garonna, Maria Julieta Hardoy, Marcello Nardini. (2003) Gabapentin in antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia: results of 1-year follow-up. Journal of Affective Disorders 75:2, 125-130
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Steven C. Stoner, Jessica W. Lea, Beth Dubisar, Patricia A. Marken, Leonard V. Ramlatchman, James Reynolds. (2003) A Program to Convert Patients from Trade-Name to Generic Clozapine. Pharmacotherapy 23:6, 806-810
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Jambur Ananth, Kartik Ananth, Karl Burgoyne, Taghrid Sidhom, Sarath Gunatilake. (2003) Pharmacotherapy for refractory schizophrenia patients. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 3:3, 387-401
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    &NA;. (2003) Recommendations. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 16, S21-S28
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    J. M. Haro, E. T. Edgell, P. B. Jones, J. Alonso, S. Gavart, K. J. Gregor, P. Wright, M. Knapp, . (2003) The European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study: rationale, methods and recruitment. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 107:3, 222-232
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Taekyu Lee, Albert J Robichaud, Kristopher E Boyle, Yimin Lu, David W Robertson, Keith J Miller, Larry W Fitzgerald, John F McElroy, Brian L Largent. (2003) Novel, highly potent, selective 5-HT2A/D2 receptor antagonists as potential atypical antipsychotics. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 13:4, 767-770
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Jeffrey M. Pyne, Greer Sullivan, Robert Kaplan, D. Keith Williams. (2003) Comparing the Sensitivity of Generic Effectiveness Measures With Symptom Improvement in Persons With Schizophrenia. Medical Care 41:2, 208-217
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    Allon Nechmad, Rachel Maayan, Edward Ramadan, Oren Morad, Michael Poyurovsky, Abraham Weizman. (2003) Clozapine decreases rat brain dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels. European Neuropsychopharmacology 13:1, 29-31
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    Richard C. Baron, Mark S. Salzer. (2002) Accounting for unemployment among people with mental illness. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 20:6, 585-599
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    S Leucht, J McGrath, P White, W Kissling, Stefan Leucht. 2002. Carbamazepine for schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychoses. .
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    LESLIE CITROME, ROBERT M. BILDER, JAN VOLAVKA. (2002) Managing Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Evidence from Randomized Clinical Trials. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 8:4, 205-215
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    Douglas Del Paggio, Patrick R. Finley, Jeanette M. Cavano. (2002) Clinical and economic outcomes associated with olanzapine for the treatment of psychotic symptoms in a county mental health population. Clinical Therapeutics 24:5, 803-817
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    &NA;. (2002) II The usefulness of the second-generation antipsychotic medications. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 15, S7-S16
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    &NA;. (2002) III The context for the use of the second-generation antipsychotic medications: opportunities and constraints. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 15, S17-S23
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    Ellen M Weissman, Susan M Essock. (2002) Pharmacoeconomics of antipsychotic medications. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 2:1, 13-21
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Michael Ritsner, Alexander Ponizovsky, Jean Endicott, Yakov Nechamkin, Boris Rauchverger, Henry Silver, Ilan Modai. (2002) The impact of side-effects of antipsychotic agents on life satisfaction of schizophrenia patients: a naturalistic study. European Neuropsychopharmacology 12:1, 31-38
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    Anne Karow, Dieter Naber. (2002) Psychosocial outcomes in patients with schizophrenia: quality of life and reintegration. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 15:1, 31-36
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    John G. Csernansky, Emily K. Schuchart. (2002) Relapse and Rehospitalisation Rates in Patients with Schizophrenia. CNS Drugs 16:7, 473-484
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    Michael J. Reinstein, Maxim A. Chasonov, Kathleen D. Colombo, Lynne E. Jones, John G. Sonnenberg. (2002) Reduction of Suicidality in Patients with Schizophrenia Receiving Clozapine. Clinical Drug Investigation 22:5, 341-346
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    Stephen B. Soumerai, Alyce S Adams, Dennis Ross-Degnan. (2001) Medicare Prescription Coverage and Congressional Gridlock. Time for Compromise. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16:12, 864-866
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    MICHAEL J. SERNYAK, ROBERT ROSENHECK, RANI DESAI, MARILYN STOLAR, GARY RIPPER. (2001) Impact of Clozapine Prescription on Inpatient Resource Utilization. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 189:11, 766-773
    CrossRef

  107. 107

    Dieter Naber, Anne Karow. (2001) Good tolerability equals good results: the patient’s perspective. European Neuropsychopharmacology 11, S391-S396
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    C. Barbui, A. Campomori, L. Mezzalira, S. Lopatriello, R. Da Cas, S. Garattini. (2001) Psychotropic drug use in Italy, 1984-99: the impact of a change in reimbursement status. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 16:4, 227-233
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    Robert Rosenheck, Douglas Leslie, Michael Sernyak. (2001) From Clinical Trials to Real-World Practice: Use of Atypical Antipsychotic Medication Nationally in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medical Care 39:3, 302-308
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    Gary Remington, Iliya Khramov. (2001) Health care utilization in patients with schizophrenia maintained on atypical versus conventional antipsychotics. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 25:2, 363-369
    CrossRef

  111. 111

    DEBORAH A. PERLICK, ROBERT R. ROSENHECK, JOHN F. CLARKIN, PATRICK RAUE, JOANNE SIREY. (2001) Impact of Family Burden and Patient Symptom Status on Clinical Outcome in Bipolar Affective Disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 189:1, 31-37
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    Rao S. Pippalla, Maria del C. Chaar. (2001) AN ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF LIFE IN AMBULATORY SCHIZOPHRENICS: WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT SCALE (WHOQOL-100) CONCEPTS QUALITY OF LIFE OF AMBULATORY SCHIZOPHRENICS. Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs 18:1-2, 53-65
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    Martin Knapp. (2000) Schizophrenia costs and treatment cost-effectiveness. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 102, 15-18
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    Eric T. Edgell, Scott W. Andersen, Bryan M. Johnstone, Brian Dulisse, Dennis Revicki, Alan Breier. (2000) Olanzapine versus Risperidone. PharmacoEconomics 18:6, 567-579
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    ANITA S. KABLINGER, ARTHUR M. FREEMAN. (2000) Prodromal Schizophrenia and Atypical Antipsychotic Treatment. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 188:10, 642-652
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    Elias Eriksson. (2000) Antidepressant drugs: does it matter if they inhibit the reuptake of noradrenaline or serotonin?. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 101:s402, 12-17
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    Sandra L. Tunis, Bryan M. Johnstone, Bruce J. Kinon, Beth L. Barber, Robert A. Browne. (2000) Designing Naturalistic Prospective Studies of Economic and Effectiveness Outcomes Associated with Novel Antipsychotic Therapies. Value in Health 3:3, 232-242
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    Philip W Lavori. (2000) Placebo control groups in randomized treatment trials: a statistician’s perspective. Biological Psychiatry 47:8, 717-723
    CrossRef

  119. 119

    Dennis A Revicki. (2000) The new atypical antipsychotics: a review of pharmacoeconomic studies. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 1:2, 249-260
    CrossRef

  120. 120

    Claire Stanniland, David Taylor. (2000) Tolerability of Atypical Antipsychotics. Drug Safety 22:3, 195-214
    CrossRef

  121. 121

    Stephen R. Marder. (2000) Newer antipsychotics. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 13:1, 11-14
    CrossRef

  122. 122

    Ric M. Procyshyn, Deborah Thompson, Gordon Tse. (2000) Pharmacoeconomics of Clozapine, Risperidone and Olanzapine. CNS Drugs 13:1, 47-76
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    John M Kane. (1999) Pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 46:10, 1396-1408
    CrossRef

  124. 124

    Kristian Wahlbeck, Maxim V Cheine, Adib Essali, Kristian Wahlbeck. 1999. Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia. .
    CrossRef

  125. 125

    Leslie R.H. Drew, Donna M. Hodgson, Kathleen M. Griffiths. (1999) Clozapine in community practice: a 3-year follow-up study in the Australian Capital Territory. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 33:5, 667-675
    CrossRef

  126. 126

    M. Swinton, A.G. Ahmed. (1999) Reasons for non-prescription of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 9:3, 207-214
    CrossRef

  127. 127

    John R. Feussner. (1999) Priorities for Patient-Centered Research. Medical Care 37:9, 843-845
    CrossRef

  128. 128

    Ulrich Frick, Jürgen Rehm, Stefan Krischker, Clemens Cording. (1999) Length of stay in a German psychiatric hospital as a function of patient and organizational characteristics – a multilevel analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 8:3, 146-161
    CrossRef

  129. 129

    Erica L. Weiss, James G. Longhurst, Malcolm B. Bowers, Carolyn M. Mazure. (1999) Olanzapine for Treatment-Refractory Psychosis in Patients Responsive to, but Intolerant of, Clozapine. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology 19:4, 378-380
    CrossRef

  130. 130

    A. L. Morera, P. Barreiro, J. L. Cano-Mufioz. (1999) Risperidone and clozapine combination for the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 99:4, 305-306
    CrossRef

  131. 131

    Paul G. Barnett. (1999) Review of Methods to Determine VA Health Care Costs. Medical Care 37, AS9-AS17
    CrossRef

  132. 132

    Susan K Schuitz, Nancy C Andreasen. (1999) Schizophrenia. The Lancet 353:9162, 1425-1430
    CrossRef

  133. 133

    M. Percudani, G. Fattore, J. Galletta, P. L. Mita, A. Contini, A. C. Altamura. (1999) Health care costs of therapy-refractory schizophrenic patients treated with clozapine: a study in a community psychiatric service in Italy. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 99:4, 274-280
    CrossRef

  134. 134

    Soumerai, Stephen B., Ross-Degnan, Dennis, . (1999) Inadequate Prescription-Drug Coverage for Medicare Enrollees — A Call to Action. New England Journal of Medicine 340:9, 722-728
    Full Text

  135. 135

    Alan Breier, Susan H Hamilton. (1999) Comparative efficacy of olanzapine and haloperidol for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 45:4, 403-411
    CrossRef

  136. 136

    M. A. Raggi, F. Bugamelli, R. Mandrioli, D. Ronchi, V. Volterra. (1999) Development and validation of an HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of clozapine and desmethylclozapine in plasma of schizophrenic patients. Chromatographia 49:1-2, 75-80
    CrossRef

  137. 137

    Claire D. Advokat, Lisa Jo Bertman, Joseph E. Comaty. (1999) Clinical outcome to clozapine treatment in chronic psychiatric inpatients. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 23:1, 1-14
    CrossRef

  138. 138

    W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker. (1999) The psychopharmacology of schizophrenia. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 12:1, 53-59
    CrossRef

  139. 139

    Mauro Percudani, Martin Knapp. (1998) The economic perspective in the care and treatment of patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 7:03, 197-209
    CrossRef

  140. 140

    Robert Rosenheck, William Lawson, John Crayton, Joyce Cramer, Weichun Xu, Jonathan Thomas, Marilyn Stolar, Dennis Charney. (1998) Predictors of differential response to clozapine and haloperidol. Biological Psychiatry 44:6, 475-482
    CrossRef

  141. 141

    John R DeQuardo, Rajiv Tandon. (1998) Review Do atypical antipsychotic medications favorably alter the long-term course of schizophrenia?. Journal of Psychiatric Research 32:3-4, 229-242
    CrossRef

  142. 142

    Julie Magno Zito. (1998) PHARMACOECONOMICS OF THE NEW ANTIPSYCHOTICS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 21:1, 181-202
    CrossRef

  143. 143

    (1998) Clozapine Compared with Haloperidol for Refractory Schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine 338:4, 268-268
    Full Text

  144. 144

    Keith, Samuel J., . (1997) Pharmacologic Advances in the Treatment of Schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine 337:12, 851-852
    Full Text

Letters