Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Correspondence

Transfusion-Transmitted Viral Infections

N Engl J Med 1996; 335:1609-1610November 21, 1996

Article

To the Editor:

Schreiber et al. (June 27 issue)1 estimate the risk of transmitting the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV), the hepatitis C virus (HCV), or the hepatitis B virus (HBV) from units of screened blood donated during the window period after recent infection. They conclude that the risk in the United States was very small during the three-year period of their study (1991–1993). We applied the same model of the incidence of seroconversion to data from the centers where 30 percent of all blood donations in France are collected.

We calculated incidence rates in the same manner as Schreiber et al. and adjusted our analysis of HBV infection to account for transient antigenemia. The only difference between our study and theirs concerned the length of the window periods for HCV and HBV infection. In the case of HCV, because since 1993 blood donations in France have been screened with third-generation assays, the window period corresponding to those assays was used.2 In the case of HBV, the window period used was the mean of those in two studies.3,4

We estimated the risk of infection in two three-year periods, 1992 through 1994 and 1993 through 1995. The results in the two periods were very similar. Table 1Table 1Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Viral Infection Associated with Window-Period Donations, 1993–1995. shows results for 1993–1995. For HIV, the estimated risks of giving blood during the window period were similar in the two countries (1 in 493,000 donations in the United States and 1 in 571,000 in France) despite the difference in the periods studied. For HCV and HBV, the rates in France were about half those in the United States. These differences can be explained in part by the differences in the length of the window period with the third-generation assays; in particular, the period in France was shorter for HCV (66 days, vs. 82 days in the United States).5 The highest transfusion-associated risks, in France as in the United States, were for HBV and HCV, which accounted for 87 percent of the aggregate risk of 1 in 67,000. HBV represented the principal risk despite the use of the vaccine, which should be encouraged among blood donors.

The most important difference between the United States and France concerned the residual risk of HTLV infection (1.56 vs. 0.17 per million donations). This difference was due to the low prevalence and incidence of HTLV type I infection in France and to the great rarity of HTLV type II infection there.6 Donations during the window period are now the chief source of the risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections. This risk has been reduced considerably and is now very small.

Anne-Marie Couroucé, Ph.D.
Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine, 75729 Paris Cedex 15, France

Josiane Pillonel, Ph.D.
Réseau National de Santé Publique, 94000 St. Maurice, France

for the Retrovirus and Viral Hepatitis Working Groups of the French Society of Blood Transfusion

6 References
  1. 1

    Schreiber GB, Busch MP, Kleinman SH, Korelitz JJ. The risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1685-1690
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Barrera JM, Francis B, Ercilla G, et al. Improved detection of anti-HCV in post-transfusion hepatitis by a third-generation ELISA. Vox Sang 1995;68:15-18
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Mimms LT, Mosley JW, Hollinger FB, et al. Effect of concurrent acute infection with hepatitis C virus on acute hepatitis B virus infection. BMJ 1993;307:1095-1097
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Fong TL, Di Bisceglie AM, Biswas R, et al. High levels of viral replication during acute hepatitis B infection predict progression to chronicity. J Med Virol 1994;43:155-158
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Courouce AM, Le Marrec N, Girault A, Ducamp S, Simon N. Anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) seroconversion in patients undergoing hemodialysis: comparison of second- and third-generation anti-HCV assays. Transfusion 1994;34:790-795
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Pillonel J, Courouce AM, Elghouzzi MH, Piquet Y, Lemaire JM. Seroconversions to HTLV in blood donors. Vox Sang 1996;70:47-47
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Author/Editor Response

The authors reply:

To the Editor: The French investigators' use of our incidence model for determining the residual risk of transfusion-transmitted infection shows the general applicability of this approach. The sole requirement is that a national or regional blood-collection system have reliable data on the incidence of new viral infections among blood donors. Given the heterogeneity of populations of donors with respect to demographic variables and the incidence of viral infections, it is important to have a method that will generate reliable estimates of risk to guide transfusion practices in different regions. Ongoing efforts to estimate window periods better will make these risk calculations more precise.

The findings from the French blood centers are strikingly similar to our recent estimates from centers participating in the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. As Couroucé and Pillonel suggest, there appears to be an important difference between France and the United States in the risk of HTLV — a difference attributable primarily to endemic HTLV-II infection in the United States. Of the nine seroconversions observed in our study, three involved HTLV-I, five involved HTLV-II, and one involved a type of HTLV that could not be identified. The residual risk of HTLV-I was 0.52 per million units as compared with the French rate of 0.17 per million, with considerable overlap between studies in the ranges of the risk estimates. HTLV-II infection, on the other hand, appears to be far more common in the United States (residual risk, 0.87 per million units) than in France.

Third-generation assays for HCV antibody and HIV p24 antigen have recently become available in the United States, which will further shorten the window periods of nondetectable transmissible infection for each of these viruses. Using the 66-day window period estimated for the third-generation HCV assay employed by Couroucé and Pillonel, we project that the residual risk of HCV in the United States has dropped 20 percent, to 7.9 per million units. This represents a remarkable improvement from the risk of 300 per million units with the first-generation HCV test first used in the United States in 1990.1 Similarly, we estimate that the recent introduction of HIV-antigen testing has decreased the risk of HIV by 27 percent, from 2.03 to 1.48 per million units.

The decreasing residual risks over the past decade are a function of several major factors: improvements in laboratory testing, vigilant screening of donors at the time of donation, and efforts by blood centers to recruit low-risk donors who give blood more than once. The low risks we reported and those reported by Couroucé and Pillonel demonstrate the success of these strategies.

George B. Schreiber, D.Sc.
Westat, Inc., Rockville, MD 20850

Michael P. Busch, M.D., Ph.D.
Irwin Memorial Blood Centers and the University of California, San Francisco, CA 94118

Steven H. Kleinman, M.D.
UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90024

1 References
  1. 1

    Donahue JG, Munoz A, Ness PM, et al. The declining risk of post-transfusion hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 1992;327:369-373
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (27)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Server Yagci, Elizaveta Padalko. (2011) Comparison of Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA With Two Anti-HCV Assays For the Detection of HCV Infection in Hospital Setting. Current Microbiology
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Peter Simmonds, David Mutimer. 2010. Hepatitis C Virus. .
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Jose R. Cruz, Maria Dolores Pérez-Rosales, Fabio Zicker, Gabriel A Schmunis. (2005) Safety of blood supply in the Caribbean countries: Role of screening blood donors for markers of hepatitis B and C viruses. Journal of Clinical Virology 34, S75-S80
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Syria Laperche, Marie-Helene Elghouzzi, Pascal Morel, Marianne Asso-Bonnet, Nadine Le Marrec, Annie Girault, Annabelle Servant-Delmas, Francoise Bouchardeau, Marie Deschaseaux, Yves Piquet. (2005) Is an assay for simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen and antibody a valuable alternative to nucleic acid testing?. Transfusion 45:12, 1965-1972
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    F. Fabrizi, A. F. de Vecchi, G. Como, G. Lunghi, P. Martin. (2005) De novo HCV infection among dialysis patients: a prospective study by HCV core antigen ELISA assay. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 21:7, 861-869
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Leslie H. Tobler, Susan L. Stramer, Stephen R. Lee, Barbara L. Masecar, Jon E. Peterson, E. Anne Davis, William E. Andrews, Jaye P. Brodsky, Steven H. Kleinman, Bruce H. Phelps, Michael P. Busch. (2003) Impact of HCV 3.0 EIA relative to HCV 2.0 EIA on blood-donor screening. Transfusion 43:10, 1452-1459
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Syria Laperche, Nadine Le Marrec, Nicole Simon, Francoise Bouchardeau, Christine Defer, Michele Maniez-Montreuil, Thierry Levayer, Jean-Pierre Zappitelli, Jean-Jacques Lefrere. (2003) A new HCV core antigen assay based on disassociation of immune complexes: an alternative to molecular biology in the diagnosis of early HCV infection. Transfusion 43:7, 958-962
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Claudio Velati, Luisa Romano, Lorella Baruffi, Marco Pappalettera, Vittorio Carreri, Alessandro R. Zanetti. (2002) Residual risk of transfusion-transmitted HCV and HIV infections by antibody-screened blood in Italy. Transfusion 42:8, 989-993
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Josiane Pillonel, Syria Laperche, Christine Saura, Jean-Claude Desenclos, Anne-Marie Courouce, . (2002) Trends in residual risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infections in France between 1992 and 2000. Transfusion 42:8, 980-988
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Jos J.A.M. Weusten, Harry A.J. van Drimmelen, P. Nico Lelie. (2002) Mathematic modeling of the risk of HBV, HCV, and HIV transmission by window-phase donations not detected by NAT. Transfusion 42:5, 537-548
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    P Simmonds, J Kurtz, RS Tedder. (2002) The UK blood transfusion service: over a (patent) barrel?. The Lancet 359:9319, 1713-1714
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    M. E. Tosti, S. Solinas, D. Prati, L. Salvaneschi, M. Manca, M. Francesconi, M. Ciuffreda, G. Girelli, A. Mele. (2002) An estimate of the current risk of transmitting blood-borne infections through blood transfusion in Italy. British Journal of Haematology 117:1, 215-219
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    A. Cleland, C. Davis, N. Adams, C. Lycett, L. M. Jarvis, H. Holmes, P. Simmonds. (2001) Development of multiplexed nucleic acid testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and hepatitis C virus. Vox Sanguinis 81:2, 93-101
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Steven H. Kleinman, Michael P. Busch. (2000) The risks of transfusion-transmitted infection: direct estimation and mathematical modelling. Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology 13:4, 631-649
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Anne-Marie Courouce, Nadine Le Marrec, Francoise Bouchardeau, Annie Razer, Michele Maniez, Syria Laperche, Nicole Simon. (2000) Efficacy of HCV core antigen detection during the preseroconversion period. Transfusion 40:10, 1198-1202
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Herbert Hendin. (2000) Regulating How We Die: The Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues Surrounding Physician-Assisted Suicide.. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 188:3, 179-180
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Anne-Marie Couroucé, Josiane Pillonel, Christine Saura. (1999) Screening of blood donations for HTLV-I/II. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 13:4, 267-274
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    A. Cleland, P. Nettleton, L.M. Jarvis, P. Simmonds. (1999) Use of Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus as an Internal Control for Amplification of Hepatitis C Virus. Vox Sanguinis 76:3, 170-174
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Anne C. E. Moor, Tom M. A. R. Dubbelman, John VanSteveninck, Anneke Brand. (1999) Transfusion-transmitted diseases: risks, prevention and perspectives. European Journal of Haematology 62:1, 1-18
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Bernard Mercier, Laetitia Burlot, Claude Férec. (1999) Simultaneous screening for HBV DNA and HCV RNA genomes in blood donations using a novel TaqMan PCR assay. Journal of Virological Methods 77:1, 1-9
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Nicolas Burin des Roziers, Joliette Coste, Anne-Marie Courouce, Frederic Bibollet-Ruche, Alain Guillard, Olivier Nasr. (1998) Detection of HIV-1 RNA in Two Consecutive Blood Donations Screened Negative for HIV Antibodies. Vox Sanguinis 75:4, 298-302
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    P. Simmonds. (1998) Transfusion virology: progress and challenges. Blood Reviews 12:3, 171-177
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    A-M. Couroucé, J. Pillonel, J-M. Lemaire, C. Saura. (1998) HTLV Testing in Blood Transfusion. Vox Sanguinis 74:S2, 165-169
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Michel Jadoul, Chantal Cornu, Charles van Ypersele de Strihou, (UCL) Collaborative Group \. (1998) Universal precautions prevent hepatitis C virus transmission: A 54 month follow-up of the Belgian multicenter study. Kidney International 53:4, 1022-1025
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    &NA; F. Wagner, Willy A. Flegel, Bernhard Kubanek. (1998) Blood transfusion: influence of transfusion therapy on outcome. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 11:2, 167-175
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    CHRISTOPHER J GRESENS, PAUL V HOLLAND. (1998) Current risks of viral hepatitis from blood transfusions. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 13:4, 443-449
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Martti Y J Hirn, Tom Krusius. (1998) Retesting of bone donors 2 months after donation guarantees sufficient safety of bone allografts. Acta Orthopaedica 69:6, 566-569
    CrossRef