Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Special Article

A Comparison of Dietary Trends among Racial and Socioeconomic Groups in the United States

Barry M. Popkin, Ph.D., Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Ph.D., and Pamela S. Haines, Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 1996; 335:716-720September 5, 1996

Abstract

Background

There may be dietary differences among racial and socioeconomic groups in the United States.

Methods

Using data from a representative sample of adults, we compared dietary trends among blacks and whites of varying socioeconomic status. We developed comparable measures of diet and of the consumption of macronutrients and food groups for 6061 participants in the 1965 Nationwide Food Consumption Surveys, 16,425 in the 1977–1978 Nationwide Food Consumption Surveys, and 9920 in the 1989–1991 Continuing Survey of Food Intake by In-dividuals (all conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture). The primary outcome was the score (range, 0 to 16) on the Diet Quality Index, a composite of eight food-and-nutrient–based recommendations from the National Academy of Sciences. A score of 4 or less was considered to indicate a relatively more healthful diet, and a value of 10 or more a relatively less healthful diet.

Results

Overall dietary quality improved in all groups, from a mean Diet Quality Index score of 7.4 in 1965 to 6.4 in 1989–1991. In 1965, blacks of low socioeconomic status and, to a lesser extent, whites of low socioeconomic status had better diets than whites of high socioeconomic status. By the 1989–1991 survey, the differences among racial and socioeconomic groups had narrowed. In 1965, 9.3 percent of whites of low socioeconomic status, 16.4 percent of blacks of low socioeconomic status, and 4.7 percent of whites of high socioeconomic status had mean scores of 4 or less. In the 1989–1991 survey, the respective percentages were 19.9, 23.5, and 20.0. Fat consumption decreased in all groups. The consumption of fruits and vegetables varied little over time, except for an increase among blacks of medium and high socioeconomic status. The consumption of grains and legumes increased over time among whites of medium and high socioeconomic status and declined among blacks of low socioeconomic status.

Conclusions

In 1965, there were large differences among groups in dietary quality, with whites of high socioeconomic status eating the least healthful diet, as measured by the index, and blacks of low socioeconomic status the most healthful. By the 1989–1991 survey, the diets of all groups had improved and were relatively similar.

Media in This Article

Table 1The Diet Quality Index.
Table 2Mean Diet Quality Index Scores and Distribution of Individual Scores of <4 or >10, According to Socioeconomic Status and Race for Each Survey.
Article

Although research on patterns of obesity and serum cholesterol concentrations suggests possible differences in diet according to race and socioeconomic status, few nationally representative studies in the United States describe dietary differences related to race or income.1-4 In general, blacks consume less fat and energy than whites, but more cholesterol.5 A cross-sectional analysis found that blacks also consume fewer fruits and vegetables than whites.6 Dietary trends over time have not been systematically explored, and the analyses have been limited by the use of aggregate food-group categories that do not reflect important patterns in the intake of fat and fiber. The use of household data, rather than data on individual diets, has also limited previous work.7-10

We used data on individual diets from a representative sample of the United States population to compare dietary trends in racial and socioeconomic groups between 1965 and 1989–1991.

Methods

Survey Design and Sample

From over 60,000 participants in three U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) surveys, we selected the nonpregnant adults (18 years of age or older) who were either white or black and for whom dietary data were available as our final sample. Of these 32,406 subjects, 6061 were respondents to the 1965 Nationwide Food Consumption Surveys, 16,425 to the 1977–1978 Nationwide Food Consumption Surveys, and 9920 to the 1989–1991 Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals. These USDA surveys are administered to stratified probability samples of households of the noninstitutionalized population in the 48 conterminous states. The 1977–1978 and 1989–1991 surveys were both conducted in four waves (winter, spring, summer, and fall), each of which surveyed a different sample.11-13 The 1965 survey gathered data on individual diets in a single sample in the spring.14 These surveys were multistage, stratified samples of the U.S. population in defined geographic areas. For each survey, response rates differed among the surveyed subgroups. Thus, weights, derived from the response rate for each subgroup, could be used to permit inferences applicable to the total noninstitutionalized U.S. population.11,12,14

Categories of socioeconomic status were based on education and income. Respondents with over 12 completed years of education and an income that was more than 350 percent of poverty level were categorized as having high socioeconomic status; respondents with less than a high-school education and an income less than 185 percent of poverty level were categorized as having low socioeconomic status. Estimates of variance in the study are frequently larger for blacks because of their smaller number in each of the three surveys. Of note is the disproportionately small number of blacks of high socioeconomic status.

Dietary Data

In each survey, interviewers asked respondents, in the respondents' homes, to recall their diet over a one-day period (a one-day dietary recall). Information was collected on everything the respondents ate inside or outside the home. The 1977–1978 and 1989–1991 surveys also included two self-administered one-day food records. To avoid biasing the results because of different methods of data collection, we used only the information from the interviewer-administered record of dietary intake in each survey.

The 1994 USDA Nutrient Database was used to calculate the nutrient value of the food intake. A linking program was used to assign the same food code to comparable items in each period. Values from the 1994 Nutrient Database were then applied to the three data sets to provide consistent estimates of nutrient composition over time. The use of a nutrient data base developed in the 1990s to assign macronutrient values to food consumed in earlier periods should not artificially create significant differences in measurements of food energy and fat content.15,16

Food Grouping

In order to examine changes in the quantity of foods consumed over time, we developed dietary measures, including measures of macronutrients and of food groups, that could be applied to the data from all three surveys. The food-grouping system disaggregates the major USDA food groups into 56 more distinct nutrient-based groups, according to fat and dietary-fiber composition; these groups included all the foods that respondents reported eating.8,10 (A copy of the food-grouping system is available from the authors.)

Diet Quality Index

The primary measure we selected to illustrate the observed trends was the Diet Quality Index, a composite of eight recommendations regarding the consumption of foods and nutrients from the National Academy of Sciences (Table 1Table 1The Diet Quality Index.).17 This index reflects the risk gradient associated with diet for major diet-related chronic diseases. Respondents who met a given dietary goal received a score of 0; those whose consumption fell within approximately 30 percent of the goal were given a score of 1; and those whose consumption differed by more than 30 percent from the goal were given a score of 2. The scores for all eight dietary goals were totaled, so that the index ranged from 0 to 16 (the lower the score, the better the diet). Details of the index's rationale, construction, and validity appear elsewhere.18,19 For the purposes of our analysis, a Diet Quality Index score of 4 or less was considered to represent a relatively more healthful diet, and a value of 10 or more a relatively less healthful diet; respondents with a Diet Quality Index score of 4 or less by definition met at least four of the eight dietary recommendations.17

Descriptive statistics on individual dietary components and the overall distribution of dietary outcomes among the respondents to each survey were generated according to race and socioeconomic status.

Results

Overall, dietary quality improved between 1965 and 1989–1991. The mean (±SE) Diet Quality Index score changed from 7.4±0.02 to 6.4±0.01. This improvement was seen in all racial and socioeconomic groups (Table 2Table 2Mean Diet Quality Index Scores and Distribution of Individual Scores of <4 or >10, According to Socioeconomic Status and Race for Each Survey.). Differences in the mean Diet Quality Index score according to race and socioeconomic status have narrowed. Within the groups of low and medium socioeconomic status, the proportion of blacks with Diet Quality Index scores of 4 or less exceeded that of whites in each period. In 1965 and 1977–1978, the proportion of people with a Diet Quality Index score of 4 or less was lower in the groups of high socioeconomic status than in the groups of lower status. Notably, the upward shift in the percentage of people with a score of 4 or less was greater among whites than blacks for low- and high-socioeconomic-status groups.

By 1989–1991, whites of high socioeconomic status had the largest increase in the percentage of people with Diet Quality Index scores of 4 or less. In 1965, 9.3 percent of whites of low socioeconomic status, 16.4 percent of blacks of low socioeconomic status, and 4.7 percent of whites of high socioeconomic status had mean Diet Quality Index scores of 4 or less; in 1989–1991, the respective percentages were 19.9, 23.5, and 20.0. In 1965, 10.7 percent of whites of low socioeconomic status, 6.1 percent of blacks of low socioeconomic status, and 16.7 percent of whites of high socioeconomic status had mean Diet Quality Index scores of 10 or more. In 1989–1991, the respective percentages were 4.4, 4.1, and 6.6.

Examination of the components of the Diet Quality Index reveals that by 1989–1991 the proportion of energy derived from fat dropped from nearly 40 percent in some groups to less than 35 percent for both races in all socioeconomic groups (Table 3Table 3Intake of Dietary Components According to Socioeconomic Status and Race for Each Survey.). Blacks reported a marginally lower percentage of energy derived from saturated fat than whites in all periods, and by 1989–1991 the mean among blacks of high socioeconomic status approached the Diet Quality Index's target of 10 percent. The consumption of dietary cholesterol declined in all groups over time. The consumption of fruits and vegetables varied little over time, except that blacks of medium and high socioeconomic status increased their mean number of servings of these foods by one, to approach or meet the recommended five servings a day. In 1965, the consumption of grains and legumes was near the recommended level of six or more servings daily among blacks of low socioeconomic status. However, the mean number of servings in this group declined over time, from 5.5 in 1965 to 4.5 in 1989–1991. The consumption of grains and legumes, however, increased over time among whites of medium and high socioeconomic status, from, for example, 3.7 servings a day for whites of high socioeconomic status in 1965 to 4.7 in 1989–1991. Excessive consumption of protein and sodium declined over time; declines in the intake of protein were greatest among blacks of medium socioeconomic status and whites of high socioeconomic status, and declines in sodium consumption were greatest among blacks of low socioeconomic status. The differences in calcium intake related to race widened over time, with whites consuming more than blacks and groups of higher socioeconomic status consuming more than those of lower socioeconomic status.

To illustrate changes in consumption between 1965 and 1989–1991, the changes in the mean intake of foods from selected food groups by whites and blacks of low socioeconomic status and whites of high socioeconomic status are shown in Table 4Table 4Dietary Intake from Food Groups in the 1989–1991 Survey and Percentage Change from the 1965 Survey.. Blacks of high socioeconomic status are excluded because of the small sample in 1965. In 1989–1991, whites of high socioeconomic status consumed low-fat foods more frequently than the other surveyed groups, reduced their intake of some high-fat foods, and increased their intake of high-fiber foods and nutrient-rich vegetables. Whites of low socioeconomic status increased their intake of low-fat foods over time, but the reductions in their intake of high-fat foods were smaller than those of whites of high socioeconomic status. Whites of low socioeconomic status also had smaller increases in their consumption of high-fiber foods and nutrient-rich dark-green and orange vegetables than whites of high socioeconomic status.

In 1989–1991 as compared with 1965, blacks of low socioeconomic status consumed low-fat foods more frequently and reduced their intake of some high-fat foods such as high-fat milk, red meat, and bacon, but they had a greater increase in the consumption of high-fat cheese than the other groups. However, the number of grams of high-fat cheese consumed per capita by blacks of low socioeconomic status was still less than in the other groups. Blacks of low socioeconomic status also markedly increased their consumption of ready-to-eat high-fiber cereals and citrus fruits. They also decreased their consumption of vegetables other than dark-green and orange vegetables.

Discussion

In general, the dietary patterns we examined with the Diet Quality Index suggest two main trends. First, the differences among racial and socioeconomic groups have narrowed over time. The overall improvement in mean Diet Quality Index scores over time reflects changing consumption patterns and increasing acceptance of dietary recommendations. The fat-related components of the index (consumption of cholesterol and of total and saturated fat) and protein intake follow this pattern; however, the mean number of servings of fruits and vegetables and the consumption of grains either have remained constant or have decreased in some groups, such as whites and blacks of low socioeconomic status. Changes related to food groups are more complex to interpret but generally show that whites of high socioeconomic status reduced their consumption of items in high-fat food groups and conformed to other dietary guidelines to a greater extent than did either whites or blacks of medium and low socioeconomic status.

Second, improvements in diet were more likely to occur in the groups of high socioeconomic status. With so few high-income blacks surveyed in 1965, we cannot describe trends in this group as clearly as we can in other groups, but our results suggest that this subgroup is more similar to whites of high socioeconomic status than to blacks of low socioeconomic status. In summary, although in 1965 there were large differences in dietary quality, with whites of high socioeconomic status eating the worst diets, as measured by the Dietary Quality Index, and blacks of low socioeconomic status the best, by 1989–1991, the diets of all groups were relatively similar.

Supported in part by a grant from the Kellogg Corporation.

We are indebted to Dr. Victor Fulgoni, Dr. Leila Saldanha, and Dr. Janet Tietyen of Kellogg, to Phil Bardsley and Kelly Gallagher for programming support, to Terri Carson for work in developing the food-group measures, to Lynn Igoe for editorial assistance, and to Frances Dancy for administrative support.

Source Information

From the Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Popkin at the Carolina Population Center, CB 8120 University Square, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27516-3997.

References

References

  1. 1

    Johnson CL, Rifkind BM, Sempos CT, et al. Declining serum total cholesterol levels among US adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. JAMA 1993;269:3002-3008
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Keil JE, Sutherland SE, Knapp RG, Lackland DT, Gazes PC, Tyroler HA. Mortality rates and risk factors for coronary disease in black as compared with white men and women. N Engl J Med 1993;329:73-78
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Kuczmarski RJ. Prevalence of overweight and weight gain in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55:Suppl:495S-502S
    Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Kumanyika SK. Special issues regarding obesity in minority populations. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:650-654
    Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Block G, Rosenberger WF, Patterson BH. Calories, fat and cholesterol: intake patterns in the US population by race, sex and age. Am J Public Health 1988;78:1150-1155
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Patterson BH, Block G, Rosenberger WF, Pee D, Kahle LL. Fruit and vegetables in the American diet: data from the NHANES II survey. Am J Public Health 1990;80:1443-1449
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Lutz SM, Smallwood DM, Blaylock JR, Hama MY. Changes in food consumption and expenditures in low-income American households during the 1980's. Statistical bulletin. No. 870. Washington, D.C.: Department of Agriculture, 1993.

  8. 8

    Popkin BM, Haines PS, Reidy KC. Food consumption trends of US women: patterns and determinants between 1977 and 1985. Am J Clin Nutr 1989;49:1307-1319
    Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Popkin BM, Guilkey DK, Haines PS. Food consumption changesof adult women between 1977 and 1985. Am J Agric Econ 1989;71:949-959
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  10. 10

    Popkin BM, Haines PS, Patterson RE. Dietary changes among older Americans, 1977-1987. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55:823-830
    Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Tippett KS, Mickle SJ, Goldman JD, et al. Food and nutrient intakes by individuals in the United States, 1 day, 1989–91: continuing survey of food intake by individuals, 1989–91. Washington, D.C.: Department of Agriculture, 1995. (Nationwide Food Consumption Survey report no. 91-2.)

  12. 12

    Peterkin BB, Rizek RL, Tippett KS. Nationwide food consumption survey, 1987. Nutr Today 1988;23:18-24
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Rizek RL. The 1977-78 nationwide food consumption survey. Fam Econ Rev 1978;4:3-3

  14. 14

    Food and nutrient intake of individuals in the United States. Spring 1965. Washington, D.C.: Agricultural Research Service, 1972.

  15. 15

    Guenther PM, Perloff BP. Effects of procedural differences between 1977 and 1987 in the Nationwide Food Consumption Survey on estimates of food and nutrient intakes: results of the USDA 1988 Bridging Study. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1990. (Nationwide Food Consumption Survey report no. 87-M-1.)

  16. 16

    Guenther PM, Perloff BB, Vizioli TL Jr. Separating fact from artifact in changes in nutrient intake over time. J Am Diet Assoc 1994;94:270-5.

  17. 17

    National Research Council, Committee on Diet and Health. Diet and health: implications for reducing chronic disease risk. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1989.

  18. 18

    Patterson RE, Haines PS, Popkin BM. Diet quality index: capturing a multidimensional behavior. J Am Diet Assoc 1994;94:57-64
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Patterson RE, Haines PS, Popkin BM. Health lifestyle patterns of U.S. adults. Prev Med 1994;23:453-460
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (99)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Ala'a Alkerwi, Nicolas Sauvageot, Anne Nau, Marie-Lise Lair, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Adelin Albert, Michèle Guillaume. (2012) Population compliance with national dietary recommendations and its determinants: findings from the ORISCAV-LUX study. British Journal of Nutrition1-10
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Barry M Popkin, Linda S Adair, Shu Wen Ng. (2012) Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutrition Reviews 70:1, 3-21
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Penny Gordon-Larsen, Barry Popkin. (2011) Understanding Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Status Disparities in Diet, Exercise, and Weight: Underlying Contextual Factors and Pathways. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 111:12, 1816-1819
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Lisa J. Harnack, Lyn Steffen, Xia Zhou, Russell V. Luepker. (2011) Trends in Vitamin D Intake from Food Sources among Adults in the Minneapolis-St Paul, MN, Metropolitan Area, 1980-1982 through 2007-2009. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 111:9, 1329-1334
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Ana Redondo, Joan Benach, Isaac Subirana, José Miguel Martinez, Miguel Angel Muñoz, Rafel Masiá, Rafael Ramos, Joan Sala, Jaume Marrugat, Roberto Elosua. (2011) Trends in the Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Cardiovascular Risk Factors across Educational Level in the 1995–2005 Period. Annals of Epidemiology 21:8, 555-563
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Bob Scarfo. (2011) Building a More Sustainable Future for Senior Living. Educational Gerontology 37:6, 466-487
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Christine E. Blake, Elaine Wethington, Tracy J. Farrell, Carole A. Bisogni, Carol M. Devine. (2011) Behavioral Contexts, Food-Choice Coping Strategies, and Dietary Quality of a Multiethnic Sample of Employed Parents. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 111:3, 401-407
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Arindam Banerjee. (2011) Food, Feed, Fuel: Transforming the Competition for Grains. Development and Change 42:2, 529-557
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Barry M Popkin. (2011) Agricultural policies, food and public health. EMBO reports 12:1, 11-18
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Carol J Waudby, Richard L Berg, James G Linneman, Luke V Rasmussen, Peggy L Peissig, Lin Chen, Catherine A McCarty. (2011) Cataract research using electronic health records. BMC Ophthalmology 11:1, 32
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    John Cawley, Christopher J. Ruhm. 2011. The Economics of Risky Health Behaviors. , 95-199.
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Kirang Kim, Seo Ah Hong, Mi Kyung Kim. (2010) Trends in nutritional inequality by educational level: A case of South Korea. Nutrition 26:7-8, 791-798
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Elisabeth Winkler, Gavin Turrell. (2010) Confidence to Cook Vegetables and the Buying Habits of Australian Households. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 110:5, S52-S61
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Sanae Tashiro. (2009) Differences in Food Preparation by Race and Ethnicity: Evidence from the American Time Use Survey. The Review of Black Political Economy 36:3-4, 161-180
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Elisabeth Winkler, Gavin Turrell. (2009) Confidence to Cook Vegetables and the Buying Habits of Australian Households. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 109:10, 1759-1768
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman, Janet W. Rich-Edwards, Ken P. Kleinman, Emily Oken, Matthew W. Gillman. (2009) Dietary Quality during Pregnancy Varies by Maternal Characteristics in Project Viva: A US Cohort. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 109:6, 1004-1011
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    J Kaluza, N Håkansson, A Brzozowska, A Wolk. (2009) Diet quality and mortality: a population-based prospective study of men. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 63:4, 451-457
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Nina S. Parikh, Marianne C. Fahs, Donna Shelley, Rajeev Yerneni. (2009) Health Behaviors of Older Chinese Adults Living in New York City. Journal of Community Health 34:1, 6-15
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    E Roos, K Talala, M Laaksonen, S Helakorpi, O Rahkonen, A Uutela, R Prättälä. (2008) Trends of socioeconomic differences in daily vegetable consumption, 1979–2002. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 62:7, 823-833
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Linda E. Kelemen, Sophia S. Wang, Unhee Lim, Wendy Cozen, Maryjean Schenk, Patricia Hartge, Yan Li, Nathaniel Rothman, Scott Davis, Stephen J. Chanock, Mary H. Ward, James R. Cerhan. (2008) Vegetables- and antioxidant-related nutrients, genetic susceptibility, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk. Cancer Causes & Control 19:5, 491-503
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Mehdi H. Shishehbor, Penny Gordon-Larsen, Catarina I. Kiefe, David Litaker. (2008) Association of neighborhood socioeconomic status with physical fitness in healthy young adults: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. American Heart Journal 155:4, 699-705
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Alanna Boynton, Marian L. Neuhouser, Bess Sorensen, Anne McTiernan, Cornelia M. Ulrich. (2008) Predictors of Diet Quality among Overweight and Obese Postmenopausal Women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 108:1, 125-130
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    C. M. Novak, J. A. Levine. (2007) Central Neural and Endocrine Mechanisms of Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis and Their Potential Impact on Obesity. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 19:12, 923-940
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Barry Popkin, Shu Wen Ng. (2007) The nutrition transition in high- and low-income countries: what are the policy lessons?. Agricultural Economics 37, 199-211
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Joel Handler. (2007) Maximizing Diuretic Therapy in Resistant Hypertension. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension 9:10, 802-806
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Peter Riley Bahr. (2007) Race and nutrition: an investigation of Black-White differences in health-related nutritional behaviours. Sociology of Health & Illness 29:6, 831-856
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Virginia B. Gray, Sylvia H. Byrd, Jeralynn S. Cossman, Joseph Chromiak, Wanda K. Cheek, Gary B. Jackson. (2007) Family Characteristics Have Limited Ability to Predict Weight Status of Young Children. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 107:7, 1204-1209
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Seungmin Lee, Lisa Harnack, David R. Jacobs, Lyn M. Steffen, Russell V. Luepker, Donna K. Arnett. (2007) Trends in Diet Quality for Coronary Heart Disease Prevention between 1980-1982 and 2000-2002: The Minnesota Heart Survey. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 107:2, 213-222
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Mara Z. Vitolins, Janet A. Tooze, Shannon L. Golden, Thomas A. Arcury, Ronny A. Bell, Cralen Davis, Robert F. Devellis, Sara A. Quandt. (2007) Older Adults in the Rural South Are Not Meeting Healthful Eating Guidelines. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 107:2, 265-272.e3
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Laurie E. Ricciuto, Valerie S. Tarasuk. (2007) An examination of income-related disparities in the nutritional quality of food selections among Canadian households from 1986–2001. Social Science & Medicine 64:1, 186-198
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Rosemary D. Cress, Cyllene Morris, Gary L. Ellison, Marc T. Goodman. (2006) Secular changes in colorectal cancer incidence by subsite, stage at diagnosis, and race/ethnicity, 1992–2001. Cancer 107:S5, 1142-1152
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Li-Ching Lyu, Ya-Ping Yu, Jung-Sheng Lee, Jia-Hui Lin, Huei-I Wang. (2006) Food and nutrient intakes for families in Taipei, Taiwan. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 19, S22-S30
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Sharon J Wayne, Kathy Baumgartner, Richard N Baumgartner, Leslie Bernstein, Deborah J Bowen, Rachel Ballard-Barbash. (2006) Diet quality is directly associated with quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 96:3, 227-232
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Carol M. Devine. (2005) A Life Course Perspective: Understanding Food Choices in Time, Social Location, and History. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 37:3, 121-128
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Satya S. Jonnalagadda, Sadhna Diwan. (2005) Health Behaviors, Chronic Disease Prevalence and Self-Rated Health of Older Asian Indian Immigrants in the U.S.. Journal of Immigrant Health 7:2, 75-83
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Sharon Friel, John Newell, Cecily Kelleher. (2005) Who eats four or more servings of fruit and vegetables per day? Multivariate classification tree analysis of data from the 1998 Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition in the Republic of Ireland. Public Health Nutrition 8:02,
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Y. Shan, R. W. Lambrecht, H. L. Bonkovsky. (2005) Association of Hepatitis C Virus Infection with Serum Iron Status: Analysis of Data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Clinical Infectious Diseases 40:6, 834-841
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Timothy Gilligan. (2005) Social disparities and prostate cancer: mapping the gaps in our knowledge. Cancer Causes & Control 16:1, 45-53
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Sandra K. Jenkins, Lynn Rew, R. Weylin Sternglanz. (2005) Eating Behaviors Among School-age Children Associated With Perceptions of Stress. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing 28:3, 175-191
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Suzen M. Moeller, Julie A. Mares. (2004) Ethnic Differences in Diet and Age-Related Maculopathies. International Ophthalmology Clinics 43:4, 47-59
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Shufa Du, Tom A Mroz, Fengying Zhai, Barry M Popkin. (2004) Rapid income growth adversely affects diet quality in China—particularly for the poor!. Social Science & Medicine 59:7, 1505-1515
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Theresa Nicklas. (2004) Assessing diet quality in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 104:9, 1383-1384
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Kester Crosse, Onuora G. Umeadi, Frank A. Anania, Jacqueline Laurin, John Papadimitriou, Cinthia Drachenberg, Charles D. Howell. (2004) Racial differences in liver inflammation and fibrosis related to chronic hepatitis C. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2:6, 463-468
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    JOHN LYNCH, GEORGE DAVEY SMITH, SAM HARPER, MARIANNE HILLEMEIER, NANCY ROSS, GEORGE A. KAPLAN, MICHAEL WOLFSON. (2004) Is Income Inequality a Determinant of Population Health? Part 1. A Systematic Review. The Milbank Quarterly 82:1, 5-99
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Alice A. Spangler, Robert T. Pettit. (2003) Differences in Preferences of Entrees by Elderly Congregate Meal Participants According to Age, Gender, Ethnicity and Education and a Factor Analysis Approach to Group Entrée Preferences. Journal of Nutrition For the Elderly 23:2, 33-53
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Marian L Neuhouser, Ruth E Patterson, Irena B King, Neilann K Horner, Johanna W Lampe. (2003) Selected nutritional biomarkers predict diet quality. Public Health Nutrition 6:07,
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    L. S. Engel. (2003) Population Attributable Risks of Esophageal and Gastric Cancers. CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment 95:18, 1404-1413
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Sharon Kirkpatrick, Valerie Tarasuk. (2003) The relationship between low income and household food expenditure patterns in Canada. Public Health Nutrition 6:06,
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Phyllis A. Wingo, Cheryll J. Cardinez, Sarah H. Landis, Robert T. Greenlee, Lynn A. G. Ries, Robert N. Anderson, Michael J. Thun. (2003) Long-term trends in cancer mortality in the United States, 1930-1998. Cancer 97:S12, 3133-3275
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Kim M Gans, Gary J Burkholder, Patricia M Risica, Thomas M Lasater. (2003) Baseline fat-related dietary behaviors of white, Hispanic, and black participants in a cholesterol screening and education project in New England. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 103:6, 699-706
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Errol D. Crook, Bobby L. Clark, Shayna T. J. Bradford, Kimberly Golden, Rosie Calvin, Herman A. Taylor, John M. Flack. (2003) From 1960s Evans County Georgia to Present-Day Jackson, Mississippi: An Exploration of the Evolution of Cardiovascular Disease in African Americans. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 325:6, 307-314
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Alexander R.P Walker, Betty F Walker, Fatima Adam. (2003) Nutrition, diet, physical activity, smoking, and longevity. Nutrition 19:2, 169-173
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Nicola Abate, Manisha Chandalia. (2003) The impact of ethnicity on type 2 diabetes. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications 17:1, 39-58
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    C.N Sciamanna, J.D DePue, M.G Goldstein, E.R Park, K.M Gans, A.D Monroe, P.T Reiss. (2002) Nutrition Counseling in the Promoting Cancer Prevention in Primary Care Study. Preventive Medicine 35:5, 437-446
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    A R P Walker, F Adam, J Walker, B F Walker. (2002) Cancer of the oesophagus in Africans in sub-Saharan Africa: any hopes for its control?. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 11:5, 413-418
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Blossom H Patterson, C Mitchell Dayton, Barry I Graubard. (2002) Latent Class Analysis of Complex Sample Survey Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97:459, 721-741
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Dennis R. Ownby. (2002) Pediatric allergy. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2:2, 129-131
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Malcolm M Koo, Thomas E Rohan, Meera Jain, John R McLaughlin, Paul N Corey. (2002) A cohort study of dietary fibre intake and menarche. Public Health Nutrition 5:02,
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    A.R.P Walker. (2002) The assessment and remedying of inadequate diets in India, as appreciated by Sir Robert McCarrison. Nutrition 18:1, 106-109
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Alexander R.P Walker, Betty F Walker, Fatima Adam. (2002) Variations in occurrences of nutrition-related diseases in Sub-Saharan Africans in stages of transition: what of the future?. Nutrition 18:1, 71-74
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Amy Luke, Richard S Cooper, T Elaine Prewitt, Adebowale A Adeyemo, Terrence E Forrester. (2001) N UTRITIONAL C ONSEQUENCES OF THE A FRICAN D IASPORA. Annual Review of Nutrition 21:1, 47-71
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Patricia G Moorman, Mary F Ricciuti, Robert C Millikan, Beth Newman. (2001) Vitamin supplement use and breast cancer in a North Carolina population. Public Health Nutrition 4:03, 821
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Barry M. Popkin, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Pamela S. Haines, Lisa Jahns. (2001) Where's the Fat? Trends in U.S. Diets 1965–1996. Preventive Medicine 32:3, 245-254
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Annie C. Wetter, Jeanne P. Goldberg, Abby C. King, Madeleine Sigman-Grant, Roberta Baer, Evelyn Crayton, Carol Devine, Adam Drewnowski, Andrea Dunn, Guy Johnson, Nico Pronk, Brian Saelens, Dan Snyder, Kellie Walsh, Rex Warland. (2001) How and Why Do Individuals Make Food and Physical Activity Choices?. Nutrition Reviews 59:3, S11-S20
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    S. B. Girois, S. K. Kumanyika, A. Morabia, E. Mauger. (2001) A comparison of knowledge and attitudes about diet and health among 35- to 75-year-old adults in the United States and Geneva, Switzerland. American Journal of Public Health 91:3, 418-424
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Lori Beth Dixon, Andrew M Tershakovec, Jeannie McKenzie, Barbara Shannon. (2000) Diet quality of young children who received nutrition education promoting lower dietary fat†. Public Health Nutrition 3:04,
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Rosemary D. Cress, Cyllene R. Morris, Bruce M. Wolfe. (2000) Cancer of the Colon and Rectum in California: Trends in Incidence by Race/Ethnicity, Stage, and Subsite. Preventive Medicine 31:4, 447-453
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Elizabeth L.R. Phillips, Donna K. Arnett, John H. Himes, Paul G. Mcgovern, Henry Blackburn, Russell V. Luepker. (2000) Differences and Trends in Antioxidant Dietary Intake in Smokers and Non-smokers, 1980–1992. Annals of Epidemiology 10:7, 417-423
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    C.J.M. Beemster, K.F.A.M. Hulshof, B.C. Breedveld, S. Westenbrink. (2000) Creation of a Database for the Calculation of Nutrient Intake Over Time. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 13:4, 411-417
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Lynn A. G. Ries, Phyllis A. Wingo, Daniel S. Miller, Holly L. Howe, Hannah K. Weir, Harry M. Rosenberg, Sally W. Vernon, Kathleen Cronin, Brenda K. Edwards. (2000) The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. Cancer 88:10, 2398-2424
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    MARIAN L NEUHOUSER, RUTH E PATTERSON, ALAN R KRISTAL, CHERYL L ROCK, DIANNE NEUMARK-SZTAINER, MARK D THORNQUIST, LAWRENCE J CHESKIN. (2000) Do Consumers of Savory Snacks Have Poor-quality Diets?. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 100:5, 576-579
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Claudia R. Baquet, Patricia Commiskey. (2000) Socioeconomic factors and breast carcinoma in multicultural women. Cancer 88:S5, 1256-1264
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Anna H. Wu. (2000) Diet and breast carcinoma in multiethnic populations. Cancer 88:S5, 1239-1244
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Ellen W. Harris, Alvin Nowverl. (2000) What's happening to soul food? Regional and income differences in the African American diet. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 38:6, 587-603
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    J Dunn. (2000) Seven-year tracking of dietary factors in young adults: the CARDIA study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 18:1, 38-45
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    BETI THOMPSON, WENDY DEMARK-WAHNEFRIED, GRETCHEN TAYLOR, JACQUELYN W. McCLELLAND, GLORIA STABLES, STEVE HAVAS, ZIDING FENG, MARIE TOPOR, JERIANNE HEIMENDINGER, KIM D. REYNOLDS, NANCY COHEN. (1999) Baseline Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Adults in Seven 5 A Day Study Centers Located in Diverse Geographic Areas. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 99:10, 1241-1248
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    NJERI M KARANJA, MARJORIE L McCULLOUGH, SHIRIKI K KUMANYIKA, KATHRYN L PEDULA, MARLENE M WINDHAUSER, EVA OBARZANEK, PAO-HWA LIN, CATHERINE M CHAMPAGNE, JANIS F SWAIN. (1999) Pre-enrollment Diets of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Trial Participants. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 99:8, S28-S34
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    JEANNE GOLDBERG, RIMA E RUDD, WILLIAM DIETZ. (1999) Using 3 Data Sources and Methods to Shape a Nutrition Campaign. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 99:6, 717-722
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Richard L. Nelson, Victoria Persky, Mary Turyk. (1999) Determination of factors responsible for the declining incidence of colorectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 42:6, 741-752
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    PAMELA S. HAINES, ANNA MARIA SIEGA-RIZ, BARRY M. POPKIN. (1999) The Diet Quality Index Revised. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 99:6, 697-704
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    ARP Walker. (1999) Letter to the Editor. Public Health Nutrition 2:01,
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Una E. MacIntyre, Ingrid I. Glatthaar, John Elias, Alexander R.P. Walker. (1998) Nutritional risk factors for coronary heart disease in South African medical students. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 37:4, 379-397
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Jennifer C. Lovejoy, Marlene M. Windhauser, Jennifer C. Rood, Jacques A. de la Bretonne. (1998) Effect of a controlled high-fat versus low-fat diet on insulin sensitivity and leptin levels in African-American and Caucasian women. Metabolism 47:12, 1520-1524
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    M R Greenberg, D Schneider, M E Northridge, M L Ganz. (1998) Region of birth and black diets: the Harlem Household Survey.. American Journal of Public Health 88:8, 1199-1202
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    Eva Roos, Eero Lahelma, Mikko Virtanen, Ritva Prättälä, Pirjo Pietinen. (1998) Gender, socioeconomic status and family status as determinants of food behaviour. Social Science & Medicine 46:12, 1519-1529
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Alexander R.P. Walker. (1998) Epidemiology and health implications of obesity, with special reference to African populations. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 37:1, 21-55
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Phyllis A. Wingo, Lynn A.G. Ries, Harry M. Rosenberg, Daniel S. Miller, Brenda K. Edwards. (1998) Cancer incidence and mortality, 1973-1995. Cancer 82:6, 1197-1207
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Henry C. McGill. (1998) Nutrition in early life and cardiovascular disease. Current Opinion in Lipidology 9:1, 23-27
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Barry M. Popkin. (1998) The effect of ethnicity on the benefits of ready-to-eat cereal consumption at breakfast. Nutrition & Food Science 98:3, 145-152
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Jacquelyn W. McClelland, Wendy Demark‐Wahnefried, R. David Mustian, Arnette T. Cowan, Marci K. Campbell. (1998) Fruit and vegetable consumption of rural African Americans: Baseline survey results of the black churches united for better health 5 a day project. Nutrition and Cancer 30:2, 148-157
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    (1997) Correction and Revision of Conclusions — Dietary Trends in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 337:25, 1846-1848
    Full Text

  92. 92

    Marilyn A. Winkleby, Beth Howard-Pitney, Cheryl A. Albright, Bonnie Bruce, Helena C. Kraemer, Stephen P. Fortmann. (1997) Predicting Achievement of a Low-Fat Diet: A Nutrition Intervention for Adults with Low Literacy Skills. Preventive Medicine 26:6, 874-882
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    STANLEY M. GARN. (1997) From the Miocene to Olestra. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 97:7, S54-S57
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    MARIE A. BERNARD, VICKI LAMPLEY-DALLAS, LULA SMITH. (1997) Common Health Problems among Minority Elders. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 97:7, 771-776
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    W. Dallas Hall, Carlos M. Ferrario, Michael A. Moore, John E. Hall PhD, John M. Flack, Warren Cooper, J. Dale Simmons, Brent M. Egan, Daniel T. Lackland, Mitchell Perry, Edward J. Roccella. (1997) Hypertension-Related Morbidity and Mortality in the Southeastern United States. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 313:4, 195-209
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    (1997) Dietary Trends in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 336:8, 583-585
    Full Text

  97. 97

    Adam Drewnowski, Barry M. Popkin. (1997) The Nutrition Transition: New Trends in the Global Diet. Nutrition Reviews 55:2, 31-43
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    Rosalind A. Breslow, Amy F. Subar, Blossom H. Patterson, Gladys Block. (1997) Trends in food intake: The 1987 and 1992 national health interview surveys. Nutrition and Cancer 28:1, 86-92
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Kumanyika, Shiriki, . (1996) Improving Our Diet — Still a Long Way to Go. New England Journal of Medicine 335:10, 738-740
    Full Text

Letters