Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis during a Long Airplane Flight

Thomas A. Kenyon, M.D., M.P.H., Sarah E. Valway, D.M.D., M.P.H., Walter W. Ihle, M.P.A., Ida M. Onorato, M.D., and Kenneth G. Castro, M.D.

N Engl J Med 1996; 334:933-938April 11, 1996

Abstract

Background

In April 1994, a passenger with infectious multidrug-resistant tuberculosis traveled on commercial-airline flights from Honolulu to Chicago and from Chicago to Baltimore and returned one month later. We sought to determine whether she had infected any of her contacts on this extensive trip.

Methods

Passengers and crew were identified from airline records and were notified of their exposure, asked to complete a questionnaire, and screened by tuberculin skin tests.

Results

Of the 925 people on the airplanes, 802 (86.7 percent) responded. All 11 contacts with positive tuberculin skin tests who were on the April flights and 2 of 3 contacts with positive tests who were on the Baltimore-to-Chicago flight in May had other risk factors for tuberculosis. More contacts on the final, 8.75-hour flight from Chicago to Honolulu had positive skin tests than those on the other three flights (6 percent, as compared with 2.3, 3.8, and 2.8 percent). Of 15 contacts with positive tests on the May flight from Chicago to Honolulu, 6 (4 with skin-test conversions) had no other risk factors; all 6 had sat in the same section of the plane as the index patient (P = 0.001). Passengers seated within two rows of the index patient were more likely to have positive tuberculin skin tests than those in the rest of the section (4 of 13, or 30.8 percent, vs. 2 of 55, or 3.6 percent; rate ratio, 8.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 41.3; P = 0.01).

Conclusions

The transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that we describe aboard a commercial aircraft involved a highly infectious passenger, a long flight, and close proximity of contacts to the index patient.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Chest Film of the Index Patient Eight Days after Flight 4, Showing Extensive Bilateral Pulmonary Disease with Cavitary Lesions.
Figure 2Diagram of the Boeing 747-100, with Seat Assignments of the Passengers and Flight Crew on Flight 4 Who Had Positive Tuberculin Skin Tests.
Article

A 1993 investigation of a flight attendant with infectious tuberculosis demonstrated transmission of the disease to other crew members, but evidence of transmission to passengers was inconclusive.1 In June 1994, a state health department notified the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that a visitor from a foreign country had died of complications of pulmonary tuberculosis; her Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolate was resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, streptomycin, and kanamycin. Before the tuberculosis was diagnosed in May 1994, she flew from Honolulu to Chicago and from Chicago to Baltimore in April 1994 and returned one month later. Because of the extent of her disease, concern about the potential transmission of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis, and uncertainty regarding passenger-to-passenger transmission of M. tuberculosis on aircraft, an investigation of the passengers and flight crew was conducted. The results of this investigation prompted the CDC to issue recommendations concerning the notification of passengers and flight crews after exposure to tuberculosis on aircraft.2

Methods

Investigation of Index Patient and Household Contacts

Medical and laboratory records of the index patient were reviewed. State and local health departments investigated the contacts of the two households in the two states where the index patient had lived during her visit to the United States.

Investigation of the Flight Crew and Passengers

The passenger manifests and lists of flight-crew members for the four flights were obtained from the airline company. Information from the manifests and from frequent-flyer records was used to locate passengers and identify seat assignments. People who were not residents of the United States or Canada were excluded from the investigation. The passengers and members of the flight crews (contacts) were notified by certified letter of their potential exposure to tuberculosis, advised to have a Mantoux tuberculin skin test, and asked to complete a questionnaire. Data collected included demographic and epidemiologic information. Except for those of contacts with evidence of previous tuberculosis or previous positive tuberculin skin tests, skin-test results reported in this study are based on written records provided by health departments or by personal physicians.

Contacts with negative results on tuberculin skin tests performed less than 12 weeks after the flight were mailed a second letter advising them of the need for a final test at least 12 weeks after their exposure. A positive tuberculin skin test was defined as involving an induration of 10 mm or larger. A skin-test conversion was defined as an increase of 10 mm or more in induration within the previous two years. Contacts with positive tuberculin skin tests or conversions were interviewed about other risk factors for tuberculosis. Results of tuberculin skin tests and interviews were reviewed independently by three tuberculosis experts, who assessed whether positive results were due to new infection or the booster effect.3-5

Data Analysis

Results of tuberculin skin tests were analyzed according to age, sex, race or ethnic group, flight, flight duration, and seat proximity to the index patient. Categorical variables were compared with the use of the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared with the use of Student's t-test.6

Aircraft

Information about the type of aircraft flown on each flight was obtained from airline records. Airline-industry diagrams were used to map seat assignments and manufacturers' specifications of airflow, and air-distribution systems were reviewed for each type of aircraft. Aircraft-ventilation systems were not otherwise evaluated.

Results

Index Patient

The index patient was a 32-year-old Korean woman, who according to relatives was taking no antituberculous medication but had previously been treated for tuberculosis — twice as an adolescent in Korea and once within the past two years in Japan — with unknown medication. She arrived in Honolulu in April on a tourist visa and was reportedly coughing and lethargic while staying with friends (Household 1) for five days. She then flew from Honolulu to Chicago and from Chicago to Baltimore, where she remained with friends (Household 2) for one month. Members of Household 2 reported a worsening of her symptoms, including progressive cough, lethargy, shortness of breath, fever, night sweats, and the eventual onset of scant hemoptysis. In May she returned to Honolulu, flying from Baltimore to Chicago and from Chicago to Honolulu. Eight days after returning to Household 1, she had an acute episode of hemoptysis, described as consisting of approximately 1 liter of bright red blood. Hospital evaluation revealed extensive pulmonary disease (Figure 1Figure 1Chest Film of the Index Patient Eight Days after Flight 4, Showing Extensive Bilateral Pulmonary Disease with Cavitary Lesions.), and her sputum was highly positive (3+) for acid-fast bacilli and was culture-positive for M. tuberculosis. The patient died of pulmonary hemorrhage and respiratory failure five days after being hospitalized.

Household Contacts of the Index Patient

Both Korean-born adults in Household 1 had positive tuberculin skin tests in June 1994. Their two children, three and seven years of age, had negative skin tests 14 weeks after exposure. The mother in Household 2 had had a positive skin test in 1977, and her chest film was normal in May 1994. The father's test showed 12 mm of induration at the end of May, and his chest film was normal. Their 21-month-old, U.S.-born child had a skin-test conversion from 0 mm of induration in May and early June (2 and 8 weeks after the index patient departed, respectively) to 22 mm of induration 17 weeks after her departure. As of December 1995, the child remained free of signs and symptoms of active tuberculosis.

Flight Crew and Passengers

Of 1042 passenger and crew contacts identified on the four flights, 117 (11.2 percent) were not notified: 24 were residents of foreign countries, and for 93 no information on their whereabouts was available. The remaining 925 (88.8 percent) resided in 41 states, Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and Canada and were notified of their possible exposure. Of these, 802 (86.7 percent) provided results of a final tuberculin skin test (at least 12 weeks after exposure). Forty-two contacts were excluded from the analysis: 40 had had tuberculosis previously or had evidence of a previous positive tuberculin skin test, 1 died of cancer, and 1 died of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) with documented anergy. Neither contact who died had signs or symptoms compatible with tuberculosis. The passenger with AIDS was already receiving rifabutin prophylaxis and had smears and cultures negative for acid-fast bacilli after exposure.

Of the 760 contacts for whom data were analyzed, 95 percent were passengers and 5 percent were crew members. Only 10 contacts (1.3 percent) were exposed on two connecting flights. Fifty-five percent of the contacts were male, 94 percent were U.S.-born, 86 percent were white, and the median age was 43 years (range, 6 months to 86 years). There were no statistically significant differences in the demographic characteristics of contacts among the four flights. Previous vaccination with bacille Calmette–Guérin (BCG) was reported by 2.6 percent of all the contacts, and exposure to a family member or friend with tuberculosis by 7.5 percent.

The results of tuberculin skin tests of the contacts are shown in Table 1Table 1Results of Tuberculin skin tests for the 760 Passengers and Crew Members, According to Flight.. In the six contacts on flight 4 who had conversions to positive skin tests, the first test was performed a median of 8 weeks after exposure (range, 34 weeks before exposure to 10 weeks after exposure), and the second test was administered a median of 23 weeks after exposure (range, 8 to 29). All the contacts with negative tuberculin skin tests had final tests performed at least 12 weeks after exposure (median, 16; range, 13 to 32).

All 11 contacts on flights 1 and 2 who had positive tuberculin skin tests had other risk factors, including birth in a country where tuberculosis is highly endemic7 or receipt of BCG (5 contacts), exposure to tuberculosis in a family member (3), residence overseas (2), and occupational exposure (1). Passengers on flights 1 and 2 who had positive tuberculin skin tests had not been seated near the index patient. On flight 3, three people had positive tuberculin skin tests, but none had conversion. Of these, two were born in countries where tuberculosis is highly endemic and had received BCG. The third person with a positive test, who had been seated three rows away from the index patient, reported having no other risk factors for tuberculosis.

The characteristics of the 15 contacts on flight 4 who had positive tuberculin skin tests are shown in Table 2Table 2Characteristics of the Passengers and Crew Members on Flight 4 who Had Positive Tuberculin Skin Tests., and their seat assignments in relation to that of the index patient are shown in Figure 2Figure 2Diagram of the Boeing 747-100, with Seat Assignments of the Passengers and Flight Crew on Flight 4 Who Had Positive Tuberculin Skin Tests.. The index patient had been seated next to the aisle in the next-to-last row of the rear cabin section of the aircraft. Nine contacts with positive tuberculin skin tests, who had been seated throughout the aircraft, had other risk factors for tuberculosis. Six contacts with positive tuberculin skin tests, including four with conversions, had no other identified risk factors.

Table 3Table 3Seat Locations in Aircraft and Results of Tuberculin Skin Tests of Passengers and Crew Members on Flight 4 Who Had no risk factors. summarizes the association between the results of tuberculin skin tests and seating proximity to the index patient for contacts on flight 4 who had no other identified risk factors. Contacts with positive tests, including four with conversions, were more likely to have been seated in the same cabin section of the aircraft as the index patient than contacts with negative tests (P = 0.001). In fact, all six contacts with positive tuberculin skin tests and no risk factors, including all four with conversions, had been seated in the same cabin section of the aircraft as the index patient. Those seated within two rows of her were 8.5 times more likely to have positive tuberculin skin tests or conversions than those seated elsewhere in the same cabin section. Among the six persons with positive tuberculin skin tests, four had been seated within two rows of the index patient, and the two seated toward the front of the rear cabin section reported having frequently visited friends seated very near the index patient and having used the lavatory close to her seat. As of February 1996, all six remained free of signs and symptoms of active tuberculosis.

Aircraft and Ventilation Systems

For both transoceanic flights, flights 1 and 4, Boeing 747-100 aircraft were used. Flight 1 took place in April and lasted 8 hours; flight 4 was in May and lasted 8.75 hours. The Chicago-to-Baltimore and Baltimore- to-Chicago flights, flights 2 and 3, were both on Airbus 320-200 aircraft and were 1.75 and 2 hours long, respectively. No flight delays were reported to have occurred on any of the flights. Both the B747-100 and A320-200 aircraft had air-recirculation systems with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration. The B747-100 aircraft recirculates air through one common reservoir for the entire aircraft. Approximately 50 percent of the air is recirculated, and rates of air exchange reported by the manufacturers of these types of aircraft range from 6 to 20 times per hour. Smoking was prohibited on all four flights.

Discussion

This incident provided a unique opportunity to investigate the transmission of M. tuberculosis on aircraft. A high proportion of U.S. residents among the passengers, repeated notification, and national media attention led to a high response rate among contacts. Prompt notification by a state tuberculosis-control program allowed us to assess the development of tuberculous infection among the May 1994 passengers and flight crew prospectively.

Our investigation provides evidence of the transmission of M. tuberculosis from passenger to passenger and from passenger to flight crew aboard commercial aircraft. Although the possibility of transmission from the index patient to other passengers on flights 1, 2, and 3 cannot be excluded, the evidence is most compelling for flight 4. This includes evidence of recent transmission (i.e., skin-test conversions), an association between transmission and proximity to the index patient, and a dose–response effect. All but one of the contacts who had no risk factors for tuberculosis and had positive skin tests, including all those with conversions, were seated in the same section as the index patient. Those seated within two rows were at greatest risk. The skin-test conversions on flight 4 but not on flight 3, although the flights took place on the same day, suggest that prolonged exposure to aerosol droplets from the index patient played a part. The apparent absence of transmission on flight 1 may have been due to the varying infectiousness of the index patient, who had long-standing disease. She was more symptomatic in May than in April. The timing of the skin-test conversion of the child in Household 2 suggests that transmission occurred just before flights 3 and 4. The children in Household 1 may have escaped infection because the index patient was less infectious in April, because they were not in close proximity to her when she returned in May, or because of chance alone, since many household contacts of people with infectious tuberculosis are known to remain uninfected.8,9 Since there are no clinical data on the risks and benefits of preventive therapy that does not include isoniazid and rifampin, clinicians of the infected contacts had two options: to administer no preventive therapy and watch carefully for the appearance of signs and symptoms of tuberculosis,10 or to consider six months of preventive therapy with rifabutin, to which the isolate was fully susceptible.

These findings are consistent with previous reports of the transmission of other airborne pathogens on commercial aircraft, such as measles, influenza, and smallpox viruses.11-13 Our results are also consistent with the previous finding that the risk of transmission of M. tuberculosis from a flight-crew member with infectious tuberculosis to other crew members increased with the duration of in-flight exposure.1 Previous investigations involving closed environments, including naval ships, also showed an association between proximity to a person with infectious tuberculosis and transmission of M. tuberculosis. 14 In our investigation, the absence of passengers with skin-test conversions in other cabin sections of the aircraft on flight 4 is further evidence that M. tuberculosis was not transmitted through the aircraft's air-recirculation system.

Domestic air travel in the United States increased by 62 percent from 1980 through 1993 — from 275 million to 445 million passengers per year.15 Air travel from foreign countries to the United States increased by 182 percent, from 12.6 million passenger arrivals during 1975 to 35.5 million in 1991.15 The projections of the World Health Organization for the worldwide tuberculosis epidemic include 90 million new cases during the present decade.16 Increased air travel, the presence of tuberculosis worldwide, and immigration to the United States from countries with high rates of tuberculosis increase the probability that passengers on commercial aircraft will be exposed to persons with tuberculosis.15-17

After the national media reported this incident in July 1994, the CDC received unsolicited reports of another 30 airline passengers with tuberculosis, including 10 whose diagnosis was already known at the time of travel, who were on commercial flights from July through December 1994. Assuming approximately 260 million airline passengers during that period, the 30 passengers with tuberculosis are estimated to represent approximately 1 of every 9 million passengers.15 This probably underestimates the risk of exposure to tuberculosis on aircraft, since the reporting was unsolicited and probably incomplete. Assuming 300 passengers per international flight and 150 per domestic flight, however, as many as 10,000 passengers may have been exposed to M. tuberculosis on these flights, or approximately 1 of every 26,000 passengers who flew during that period. Furthermore, in our investigation less than 1 percent of all the contacts had skin-test conversions as a result of exposure to the index patient on the aircraft. Although limited by underreporting, these data suggest that passengers and flight crews have a relatively low risk of exposure to and transmission of M. tuberculosis on commercial aircraft in the United States.

In this investigation, the passenger with tuberculosis was a tourist from a region of the world where tuberculosis is highly endemic.7,16 Screening for active tuberculosis is required for immigrants and refugees applying for legal residency in the United States but not for tourists, visitors on business, or students.18 During 1993, 79 percent of the 21.4 million nonimmigrants who arrived in the United States were tourists.19 Screening such large numbers of nonimmigrants, even from selected countries with high rates of tuberculosis, would be impractical and very costly and, unless performed just before their flights, would not necessarily prevent exposure to persons with active tuberculosis.

To develop recommendations based on the available scientific evidence, in February 1995 officials of the CDC met with representatives from the Federal Aviation Administration, the Air Transport Association, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, and the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association, as well as medical consultants from major airline companies. In March 1995, the CDC summarized six investigations of possible transmission of M. tuberculosis on aircraft and provided guidance for notifying passengers and flight crews in the event of exposure to tuberculosis during travel on commercial aircraft.2 Four investigations found no conclusive evidence of the transmission of M. tuberculosis to other passengers.2,20,21 Table 4Table 4Suggested Criteria and Procedures for Notifying Passengers and Flight Crews after Exposure to Tuberculosis on Commercial Aircraft. shows suggested criteria and procedures for the notification of contacts that were distributed nationally to airline companies, state health departments, and tuberculosis-control programs in March 1995. The decision to notify passengers and crew members potentially exposed to tuberculosis should be guided by three criteria: the flight duration, the infectiousness of the index patient (e.g., whether he or she has smear-positive, cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis or laryngeal tuberculosis and whether there has been documented transmission to contacts), and seating proximity to the index patient, depending on the aircraft design.2 In cases in which the airline is informed first, it should provide the name of the passenger's physician to the state health department in the state where the patient resides or is being treated for tuberculosis so that the health department can make a determination of infectiousness. Applying these criteria to instances of exposure to tuberculosis on aircraft will make it easier to decide when to inform those who may potentially benefit from preventive therapy, while averting the expenditure of resources in circumstances in which the transmission of M. tuberculosis is highly unlikely. The top priority of tuberculosis-control programs is still to identify and ensure the complete treatment of all patients with active tuberculosis.23

These suggested procedures apply to all domestic and foreign airlines. They were developed in the context of tuberculosis control in the United States, however, and may not be directly applicable to countries where strategies of tuberculosis prevention and control are different. The Global Tuberculosis Program of the World Health Organization, in collaboration with the CDC, has suggested these procedures to carriers that are not U.S.-based through the International Airline Transportation Association.

We are indebted to the staffs of more than 40 state and local health departments, the airline company, and the physicians of the exposed passengers and crew for their assistance and support in conducting the investigation; to the staffs of the tuberculosis-control programs of the states of Hawaii and Maryland for sharing information about the index patient and the results of contact investigations; and to the representatives of the Federal Aviation Administration, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, the Airline Transport Association, the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association, and the airline companies for their participation in the development of recommendations for notifying passengers and crew after possible exposure to tuberculosis on aircraft.

Source Information

From the Epidemic Intelligence Service, Epidemiology Program Office (T.A.K.), and the Division of Tuberculosis Elimination (T.A.K., S.E.V., W.W.I., I.M.O., K.G.C.), National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Kenyon at 1600 Clifton Rd., Mailstop E-10, Atlanta, GA 30333.

References

References

  1. 1

    Driver CR, Valway SE, Morgan WM, Onorato IM, Castro KG. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis associated with air travel. JAMA 1994;272:1031-1035
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  2. 2

    Exposure of passengers and flight crew to Mycobacterium tuberculosis on commercial aircraft, 1992-1995MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44:137-140
    Medline

  3. 3

    Thompson NJ, Glassroth JL, Snider DE Jr, Farer LS. The booster phenomenon in serial tuberculin testing. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979;119:587-597
    Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    Menzies R, Vissandjee B, Rocher I, St Germain Y. The booster effect in two-step tuberculin testing among young adults in Montreal. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:190-198
    Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    Huebner RE, Schein MF, Bass JB Jr. The tuberculin skin test. Clin Infect Dis 1993;17:968-975
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Dean AG, Dean JA, Coulombier D, et al. Epi Info, version 6: a word processing, database, and statistics program for epidemiology on microcomputers. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1994.

  7. 7

    Tuberculosis morbidity -- United States, 1994. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44:387-395
    Medline

  8. 8

    Rose CE Jr, Zerbe GO, Lantz SO, Bailey WC. Establishing priority during investigation of tuberculosis contacts. Am Rev Respir Dis 1979;119:603-609
    Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Tuberculosis in the United States, 1985-1986. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control, 1987:95. (DHHS publication no. (CDC) 88-8322.)

  10. 10

    Management of persons exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosisMMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1992;41:59-71

  11. 11

    Amler RW, Bloch AB, Orenstein WA, Bart KJ, Turner PM Jr, Hinman AR. Imported measles in the United States. JAMA 1982;248:2129-2133
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Moser MR, Bender TR, Margolis HS, Noble GR, Kendal AP, Ritter DG. An outbreak of influenza aboard a commercial airliner. Am J Epidemiol 1979;110:1-6
    Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Ritzinger FR. Disease transmission by aircraft. Aeromed Rev 1965;4:1-10

  14. 14

    Houk VN, Baker JH, Sorensen K, Kent DC. The epidemiology of tuberculosis infection in a closed environment. Arch Environ Health 1968;16:26-35
    Medline

  15. 15

    Wilson RA. Transportation in America: statistical analysis of transportation in the United States. 12th ed. Lansdowne, Va.: Eno Transportation Foundation, 1994.

  16. 16

    Raviglione MC, Snider DE Jr, Kochi A. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis: morbidity and mortality of a worldwide epidemic. JAMA 1995;273:220-226
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    McKenna MT, McCray E, Onorato I. The epidemiology of tuberculosis among foreign-born persons in the United States, 1986 to 1993. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1071-1076
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Public Health Service. Technical instructions for medical examination of aliens. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control, 1991.

  19. 19

    Immigration and Naturalization Service. Statistical yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1993. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1994.

  20. 20

    Miller MA, Valway SE, Onorato IM. Assessing tuberculin skin test (TST) conversion after exposure to tuberculosis on airplanes. Presented at the Meeting of the American Public Health Association Epidemiology Exchange, San Francisco, October 27, 1993. abstract.

  21. 21

    McFarland JW, Hickman C, Osterholm MT, MacDonald KL. Exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis during air travel. Lancet 1993;342:112-113
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Braden CR, Valway SE, Onorato IM, et al. Infectiousness of a university student with laryngeal and cavitary tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:565-570
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    American Thoracic Society. Control of tuberculosis in the United States. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;146:1623-1633
    Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (80)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    S. Yin, G.N. Sze-To, Christopher Y.H. Chao. (2012) Retrospective analysis of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis outbreak during a flight using computational fluid dynamics and infection risk assessment. Building and Environment 47, 50-57
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    S. C. Hadler, K. G. Castro, W. Dowdle, L. Hicks, G. Noble, R. Ridzon. (2011) Epidemic Intelligence Service Investigations of Respiratory Illness, 1946-2005. American Journal of Epidemiology 174:suppl 11, S36-S46
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    S. Ansart. (2011) Infections respiratoires et voyages. La Revue de Médecine Interne
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Gregory J Fox, Claudia C Dobler, Guy B Marks, Gregory J Fox. 2011. Active case finding in contacts of people with tuberculosis. .
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    T.M. Korves, D. Johnson, B.W. Jones, J. Watson, D.M. Wolk, G.M. Hwang. (2011) Detection of respiratory viruses on air filters from aircraft. Letters in Applied Microbiology 53:3, 306-312
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Keun-Tae Park, Kyong-Whan Moon, Hyung-Tae Kim, Chan-Jung Park, Ho-Chul Jeong, Young-Hee Lim. (2011) Detection of Airborne Respiratory Viruses in Residential Environments. Korean Journal of Environmental Health Sciences 37:4, 306-314
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Szu-Chieh Chen, Chung-Min Liao, Sih-Syuan Li, Shu-Han You. (2011) A Probabilistic Transmission Model to Assess Infection Risk from Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Commercial Passenger Trains. Risk Analysis 31:6, 930-939
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    T. Hirama, K. Hagiwara, M. Kanazawa. (2011) Tuberculosis screening programme using the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test and chest computed tomography for healthcare workers accidentally exposed to patients with tuberculosis. Journal of Hospital Infection 77:3, 257-262
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Gin Nam Sze-To, Christopher Y. H. Chao. (2011) Use of Risk Assessment and Likelihood Estimation to Analyze Spatial Distribution Pattern of Respiratory Infection Cases. Risk Analysis 31:3, 351-369
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Tara N. Palmore, Kent A. Sepkowitz. 2011. Airborne Infectious Diseases. .
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Jitendra K. Gupta, Chao-Hsin Lin, Qingyan Chen. (2011) Transport of expiratory droplets in an aircraft cabin. Indoor Air 21:1, 3-11
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Paul J. Edelson, M. Phypers. (2011) TB transmission on public transportation: A review of published studies and recommendations for contact tracing. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 9:1, 27-31
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Fuqiang Cui, Huiming Luo, Lei Zhou, Dapeng Yin, Canjun Zheng, Dingming Wang, Jian Gong, Gang Fang, Jianfeng He, Jeffrey McFarland, Hongjie Yu. (2011) Transmission of Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in a Train in China. Journal of Epidemiology 21:4, 271-277
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Tara N. Palmore, Kent A. Sepkowitz. 2010. Airborne Infectious Diseases. .
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Gregory Fox, Guy Marks, Gregory Fox. 2010. Active case finding for increasing case detection of tuberculosis. .
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Ajit Lalvani, Manish Pareek. (2010) Interferon gamma release assays: principles and practice. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 28:4, 245-252
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Nigel P. Dowdall, Anthony D. Evans, Claude Thibeault. (2010) Air Travel and TB: An airline perspective. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 8:2, 96-103
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Ibrahim Abubakar. (2010) Tuberculosis and air travel: a systematic review and analysis of policy. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 10:3, 176-183
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Derek Scholten, Andrea Saunders, Kathryn Dawson, Thomas Wong, Edward Ellis. (2010) Air travel by individuals with active tuberculosis: Reporting patterns and epidemiologic characteristics, Canada 2006–2008. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 8:2, 113-119
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Léopold Blanc, Mario Raviglione. (2010) Prevention and control of tuberculosis during air travel. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 8:2, 79-80
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Karen J. Marienau, Gregory W. Burgess, Elaine Cramer, Francisco M. Averhoff, Ann M. Buff, Michelle Russell, Curi Kim, John C. Neatherlin, Harvey Lipman. (2010) Tuberculosis investigations associated with air travel: U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, January 2007–June 2008. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 8:2, 104-112
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Marjery N. López-Acevedo, Zulmari Campos-Santiago, William Rodríguez-Cintrón. (2009) Miliary Tuberculosis. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice 17:6, 401-403
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    J. CASTILLA, R. PALMERA, A. NAVASCUÉS, M. ABETI, A. GUILLERMO, F. IRISARRI, M. S. JIMÉNEZ, M. GARCÍA CENOZ, A. BARRICARTE. (2009) Population-based contact investigation of a cluster of tuberculosis cases in a small village. Epidemiology and Infection 137:10, 1426
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    T. RACHAEL, K. SCHUBERT, W. HELLENBRAND, G. KRAUSE, J. M. STUART. (2009) Risk of transmitting meningococcal infection by transient contact on aircraft and other transport. Epidemiology and Infection 137:08, 1057
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    John D. Malone, Robert Brigantic, George A. Muller, Ashok Gadgil, Woody Delp, Benjamin H. McMahon, Russell Lee, Jim Kulesz, F. Matthew Mihelic. (2009) U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 7:4, 181-191
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    M. P. Wan, G. N. Sze To, C. Y. H. Chao, L. Fang, A. Melikov. (2009) Modeling the Fate of Expiratory Aerosols and the Associated Infection Risk in an Aircraft Cabin Environment. Aerosol Science and Technology 43:4, 322-343
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Hiroyuki Furuya, Michiko Nagamine, Tetsu Watanabe. (2009) Use of a mathematical model to estimate tuberculosis transmission risk in an Internet café. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 14:2, 96-102
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    J. D. HOLMES, G. C. SIMMONS. (2009) Gastrointestinal illness associated with a long-haul flight. Epidemiology and Infection 137:03, 441
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Rachael M. Jones, Yoshifumi Masago, Timothy Bartrand, Charles N. Haas, Mark Nicas, Joan B. Rose. (2009) Characterizing the Risk of Infection from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Commercial Passenger Aircraft Using Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment. Risk Analysis 29:3, 355-365
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    S. Mazumdar, Q. Chen. (2009) A one-dimensional analytical model for airborne contaminant transport in airliner cabins. Indoor Air 19:1, 3-13
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Lin H. Chen, Mary Elizabeth Wilson. (2008) The Role of the Traveler in Emerging Infections and Magnitude of Travel. Medical Clinics of North America 92:6, 1409-1432
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Priya Sampathkumar. (2008) Drug resistant tuberculosis: a global public health issue. International Journal of Dermatology 47:10, 985-988
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Lindsay Martinez, Léopold Blanc, Paul Nunn, Mario Raviglione. (2008) Tuberculosis and air travel: WHO guidance in the era of drug-resistant TB. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 6:4, 177-181
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    N. P. Gao, J. L. Niu. (2008) Personalized Ventilation for Commercial Aircraft Cabins. Journal of Aircraft 45:2, 508-512
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Sagnik Mazumdar, Qingyan Chen. (2008) Influence of cabin conditions on placement and response of contaminant detection sensors in a commercial aircraft. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 10:1, 71
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    D. Kaye. (2007) 1 August News. Clinical Infectious Diseases 45:3, iii-iv
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    P. Sampathkumar. (2007) Dealing With Threat of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Background Information for Interpreting the Andrew Speaker and Related Cases. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 82:7, 799-802
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Ajit Lalvani, Kerry A Millington. (2007) T cell-based diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis infection. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 20:3, 264-271
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    R. Diel. (2007) Prävention und Kontrolle der Tuberkulose. Der Pneumologe 4:3, 187-193
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Hiroyuki Furuya. (2007) Risk of transmission of airborne infection during train commute based on mathematical model. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 12:2, 78-83
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Francisco García Río, Luis Borderías Clau, Ciro Casanova Macario, Bartolomé R. Celli, Joan Escarrabill Sanglás, Nicolás González Mangado, Josep Roca Torrent, Fernando Uresandi Romero. (2007) Patología respiratoria y vuelos en avión. Archivos de Bronconeumología 43:2, 101-125
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Y. Li, G. M. Leung, J. W. Tang, X. Yang, C. Y. H. Chao, J. Z. Lin, J. W. Lu, P. V. Nielsen, J. Niu, H. Qian, A. C. Sleigh, H.-J. J. Su, J. Sundell, T. W. Wong, P. L. Yuen. (2007) Role of ventilation in airborne transmission of infectious agents in the built environment ? a multidisciplinary systematic review. Indoor Air 17:1, 2-18
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Neville Byrne. (2007) Low prevalence of TB on long-haul aircraft. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 5:1, 18-23
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    H HINNINGHOFEN, P ENCK. (2006) Passenger well-being in airplanes. Autonomic Neuroscience 129:1-2, 80-85
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    L. Morawska. (2006) Droplet fate in indoor environments, or can we prevent the spread of infection?. Indoor Air 16:5, 335-347
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    H. Akan, Ö. Arslan, Ö.A. Akan. (2006) Tuberculosis in stem cell transplant patients. Journal of Hospital Infection 62:4, 421-426
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Qanta A Ahmed, Yaseen M Arabi, Ziad A Memish. (2006) Health risks at the Hajj. The Lancet 367:9515, 1008-1015
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    C.J. McManus, S.T. Kelley. (2005) Molecular survey of aeroplane bacterial contamination. Journal of Applied Microbiology 99:3, 502-508
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Jim Yong Kim, Aaron Shakow, Kedar Mate, Chris Vanderwarker, Rajesh Gupta, Paul Farmer. (2005) Limited good and limited vision: multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and global health policy. Social Science & Medicine 61:4, 847-859
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Muhammad R. Sohail, Philip R. Fischer. (2005) Health risks to air travelers. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 19:1, 67-84
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    K. Leder, D. Newman. (2005) Respiratory infections during air travel. Internal Medicine Journal 35:1, 50-55
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Pauli N. Amornkul, Hiroshi Takahashi, April K. Bogard, Michele Nakata, Rafael Harpaz, Paul V. Effler. (2004) Low Risk of Measles Transmission after Exposure on an International Airline Flight. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 189:s1, S81-S85
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    William F Paolo, Joshua D Nosanchuk. (2004) Tuberculosis in New York city: recent lessons and a look ahead. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 4:5, 287-293
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Gwangpyo Ko, Kimberly M. Thompson, Edward A. Nardell. (2004) Estimation of Tuberculosis Risk on a Commercial Airliner. Risk Analysis 24:2, 379-388
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Séverine Ansart, Olivier Pajot, Jean-Philippe Grivois, Valérie Zeller, Elise Klement, Lucia Perez, Philippe Bossi, François Bricaire, Eric Caumes. (2004) Pneumonia among Travelers Returning from Abroad. Journal of Travel Medicine 11:2, 87-91
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Joia S Mukherjee, Michael L Rich, Adrienne R Socci, J Keith Joseph, Felix Alcántara Virú, Sonya S Shin, Jennifer J Furin, Mercedes C Becerra, Donna J Barry, Jim Yong Kim, Jaime Bayona, Paul Farmer, Mary C Smith Fawzi, Kwonjune J Seung. (2004) Programmes and principles in treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The Lancet 363:9407, 474-481
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Yoichi NAKAMURA, Yasushi OBASE, Naofumi SUYAMA, Yoshitsugu MIYAZAKI, Hideaki OHNO, Mikio OKA, Mitsuyoshi TAKAHASHI, Shigeru KOHNO. (2004) A Small Outbreak of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Non-close Contact Patrons of a Bar. Internal Medicine 43:3, 263-267
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Olsen, Sonja J., Chang, Hsiao-Ling, Cheung, Terence Yung-Yan, Tang, Antony Fai-Yu, Fisk, Tamara L., Ooi, Steven Peng-Lim, Kuo, Hung-Wei, Jiang, Donald Dah-Shyong, Chen, Kow-Tong, Lando, Jim, Hsu, Kwo-Hsiung, Chen, Tzay-Jinn, Dowell, Scott F., . (2003) Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome on Aircraft. New England Journal of Medicine 349:25, 2416-2422
    Full Text

  59. 59

    M.E. Wilson. (2003) The traveller and emerging infections: sentinel, courier, transmitter. Journal of Applied Microbiology 94:s1, 1-11
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Musher, Daniel M., . (2003) How Contagious Are Common Respiratory Tract Infections?. New England Journal of Medicine 348:13, 1256-1266
    Full Text

  61. 61

    Hamdan Al-Jahdali, Ziad A Memish, Dick Menzies. (2003) Tuberculosis in association with travel. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 21:2, 125-130
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Gary Maartens, Nulda Beyers. (2002) Tuberculosis in the tropics. Clinics in Chest Medicine 23:2, 341-350
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Gendreau, Mark A., DeJohn, Charles, . (2002) Responding to Medical Events during Commercial Airline Flights. New England Journal of Medicine 346:14, 1067-1073
    Full Text

  64. 64

    Arun Kumar, Sudhir Sinha, Prem M.S Chauhan. (2002) Syntheses of novel antimycobacterial combinatorial libraries of structurally diverse substituted pyrimidines by three-component solid-phase reactions. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 12:4, 667-669
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Seymour Waner, David N. Durrheim, Peter A. Leggat, Mary H. Ross. (2001) Preventing Infectious Diseases in Long-Term Travelers to Rural Africa. Journal of Travel Medicine 8:6, 304-308
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Iruka N. Okeke, Robert Edelman. (2001) Dissemination of Antibiotic‐Resistant Bacteria across Geographic Borders. Clinical Infectious Diseases 33:3, 364-369
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Ajit Lalvani, Ansar A Pathan, Helen Durkan, Katalin A Wilkinson, Adam Whelan, Jonathan J Deeks, William HH Reece, Mohammed Latif, Geoffrey Pasvol, Adrian VS Hill. (2001) Enhanced contact tracing and spatial tracking of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by enumeration of antigen-specific T cells. The Lancet 357:9273, 2017-2021
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Mary E. Wilson. (2001) Travel-Related Vaccines. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 15:1, 231-251
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    A.S Klovdahl, E.A Graviss, A Yaganehdoost, M.W Ross, A Wanger, G.J Adams, J.M Musser. (2001) Networks and tuberculosis: an undetected community outbreak involving public places. Social Science & Medicine 52:5, 681-694
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    John D. Boice, Maria Blettner, Anssi Auvinen. (2000) Epidemiologic Studies Of Pilots And Aircrew. Health Physics 79:5, 576-584
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Pair Dong Wang, R.S. Lin. (2000) Tuberculosis Transmission in the Family. Journal of Infection 41:3, 249-251
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    M Hocking. (2000) Passenger aircraft cabin air quality: trends, effects, societal costs, proposals. Chemosphere 41:4, 603-615
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Najibullah A. Habib, Ron H. Behrens. (2000) Respiratory infections in the traveler. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine 6:3, 246-249
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    M.M. Hannan, B.S. Azadian, B.G. Gazzard, D.A. Hawkins, P.N. Hoffman. (2000) Hospital infection control in an era of HIV infection and multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Journal of Hospital Infection 44:1, 5-11
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    S.C. PANG. (1999) Tuberculosis in non-residents in Western Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 29:1, 79-81
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Sofía Samper, Carlos Martín, Alfonso Pinedo, Antonio Rivero, Jesús Blázquez, Fernando Baquero, Dick van Soolingen, Jan van Embden. (1997) Transmission between HIV-infected patients of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis. AIDS 11:10, 1237-1242
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Daniel A. Nafziger, Tammy Lundstrom, Shalini Chandra, R. Michael Massanari. (1997) INFECTION CONTROL IN AMBULATORY CARE. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 11:2, 279-296
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Stan Houston. (1997) Tuberculosis Risk and Prevention in Travelers—What about BCG?. Journal of Travel Medicine 4:2, 76-82
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    (1996) Transmission of Tuberculosis during a Long Airplane Flight. New England Journal of Medicine 335:9, 675-676
    Full Text

  80. 80

    Wenzel, Richard P., . (1996) Airline Travel and Infection. New England Journal of Medicine 334:15, 981-982
    Full Text