Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Identification of a Brazil-Nut Allergen in Transgenic Soybeans

Julie A. Nordlee, M.S., Steve L. Taylor, Ph.D., Jeffrey A. Townsend, B.S., Laurie A. Thomas, B.S., and Robert K. Bush, M.D.

N Engl J Med 1996; 334:688-692March 14, 1996

Abstract

Background

The nutritional quality of soybeans (Glycine max) is compromised by a relative deficiency of methionine in the protein fraction of the seeds. To improve the nutritional quality, methionine-rich 2S albumin from the Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) has been introduced into transgenic soybeans. Since the Brazil nut is a known allergenic food, we assessed the allergenicity of the 2S albumin.

Methods

The ability of proteins in transgenic and nontransgenic soybeans, Brazil nuts, and purified 2S albumin to bind to IgE in serum from subjects allergic to Brazil nuts was determined by radioallergosorbent tests (four subjects) and sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis (nine subjects) with immunoblotting and autoradiography. Three subjects also underwent skin-prick testing with extracts of soybean, transgenic soybean, and Brazil nut.

Results

On radioallergosorbent testing of pooled serum from four subjects allergic to Brazil nuts, protein extracts of transgenic soybean inhibited binding of IgE to Brazil-nut proteins. On immunoblotting, serum IgE from eight of nine subjects bound to purified 2S albumin from the Brazil nut and to proteins of similar molecular weight in the Brazil nut and the transgenic soybean. On skin-prick testing, three subjects had positive reactions to extracts of Brazil nut and transgenic soybean and negative reactions to soybean extract.

Conclusions

The 2S albumin is probably a major Brazil-nut allergen, and the transgenic soybeans analyzed in this study contain this protein. Our study shows that an allergen from a food known to be allergenic can be transferred into another food by genetic engineering.

Media in This Article

Figure 3Reactivity on Skin-Prick Testing to Extracts of Transgenic Soybean, Nontransgenic Soybean, and Brazil Nut in a Subject Allergic to Brazil Nuts.
Figure 1Results of Radioallergosorbent Assays with Extracts of Nontransgenic Soybean (▲), Transgenic Soybean (■), and Brazil Nut (●).
Article

Allergies to nuts are among the most common food allergies,1 and allergies to the Brazil nut are well documented.2 Concern has been expressed about the introduction of allergenic proteins into food plants by genetic engineering.3-5 The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has directed developers of new plant varieties to consider the allergenic potential of donor organisms in assessing the safety of foods derived from genetically engineered plants.6 If there is insufficient information to demonstrate that the introduced protein could not cause allergic reactions in a susceptible population, then the food would require a label to alert consumers to this fact.

The nutritional quality of legumes, including soybeans (Glycine max), for both humans and animals is compromised by a deficiency of methionine in the protein fraction of the seeds.7 As a result, diets for domestic animals that are based on soybean meal must be fortified with methionine or protein sources of this essential amino acid. For the same reason, human vegetarians must carefully balance their diets to ensure an adequate intake of methionine. There have been many attempts to manipulate the balance of essential amino acids in important crops by traditional methods of plant breeding, but improvements in nutritional quality have often come at the expense of agronomic properties such as yield or grain quality. The introduction of genes encoding sulfur-rich proteins from other plants into soybeans through recombinant-DNA techniques is a promising strategy for improving the nutritional quality of soybeans without adversely affecting agronomic performance. The 2S albumin from the seeds of the Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) is ideal for this purpose because it is composed of 18 percent and 8 percent, respectively, of the sulfur amino acids methionine and cysteine.8 The 2S albumin gene from the Brazil nut has been introduced into soybeans,9 tobacco, oilseed rape (Brassica napus), the legume Vicia narbonensis, and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris).10-14

Our objective was to determine whether the 2S albumin from the Brazil nut as expressed in transgenic soybeans was able to bind IgE from people who are allergic to Brazil nuts. Proteins that bind IgE from people with allergies are likely to be allergens, since the mechanism of immediate hypersensitivity is the cross-linking of specific proteins and specific IgE on the surface of sensitized mast cells, causing them to degranulate and release histamine and other mediators of allergic disease.

Methods

Subjects

For radioallergosorbent assays, a serum was pooled from four sub jects with a history of allergic reactions to Brazil nuts that included oropharyngeal swelling and itching, facial swelling, laryngeal edema, and bronchospasm with wheezing. All four had positive skin-prick tests in response to extracts of Brazil nut and positive radioallergosorbent tests, with binding to Brazil-nut protein in the solid phase that was 9 to 38 times greater than binding with control serum from sub jects with no history of food allergies. For experiments using sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), serum was obtained from five additional subjects who either indicated that they had similar symptoms or reported a history of avoiding all nuts. These five also had positive skin-prick tests and positive radioallergosorbent tests, with binding to Brazil-nut protein in the solid phase that was 4 to 64 times greater than binding with control serum from subjects with no history of food allergies. As a control, serum was pooled from eight subjects without food allergies. Skin-prick tests with transgenic material were performed on three subjects with histories of sensitivity to Brazil nuts and no history of sensitivity to soybeans and three subjects (one with atopy) with no history of sensitivity to Brazil nuts or soybeans. All subjects gave informed consent as stipulated by the University of Nebraska or the University of Wisconsin institutional review board or by Plasma Labs, International (Everett, Wash.).

Radioallergosorbent Assay

Transgenic and nontransgenic soybeans were obtained from Pioneer Hi-Bred International (Johnston, Iowa). Raw Brazil nuts were obtained from Open Harvest Grocery (Lincoln, Nebr.). The Brazil nuts, transgenic soybeans, and nontransgenic soybeans were defatted with acetone and ethyl ether.15 Extracts were prepared (1:10 wt/vol) with 0.01 M potassium phosphate–buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 0.02 percent sodium azide and stirred at room temperature for two hours. The extracts were clarified by ultracentrifugation for one hour at 82,000×g. The protein content of the extracts was determined by the Lowry–Folin method.16 Brazil-nut protein in the solid phase was prepared according to the method of Adolphson et al.17 with microcrystalline cellulose and 10 mg of protein from defatted Brazil-nut extract.

For the radioallergosorbent assay,17 serial dilutions of Brazil-nut and soybean extracts were prepared with potassium phosphate–buffered saline containing 0.02 percent sodium azide as the diluent and incubated overnight with Brazil-nut protein in the solid phase and pooled serum from four subjects allergic to Brazil nuts. The solid phase was then washed and incubated overnight with antihuman IgE labeled with iodine-125 (Pharmacia and Upjohn, Diagnostics Division, Columbus, Ohio). Excess labeled antibody was removed by washing, and the radioactivity of the solid phase was measured with a sodium iodide scintillation detector. The percent inhibition of IgE binding was calculated with the use of values from samples without inhibitor protein as a measure of maximal binding. For the radioallergosorbent test,17 serum samples were allowed to react directly with the solid phase without inhibitor protein, and bound IgE was measured as described above. Scores for the radioallergosorbent test were calculated as a multiple of the score obtained with pooled serum from subjects without food allergies.

Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting

Extracts of Brazil nut, transgenic soybean, and nontransgenic soybean were prepared as described above, except that the pH of potassium phosphate–buffered saline containing 0.02 percent sodium azide was 7.2 and single soybean seeds were used for extraction. The Brazil nuts and soybeans were not defatted. The purified 2S albumin from the Brazil nut18 was diluted in potassium phosphate–buffered saline containing 0.02 percent sodium azide, pH 7.2. Proteins from these extracts and the 2S albumin were separated by SDS-PAGE with minigels with gradients of 10 to 20 percent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.). The wells were loaded with 15 μg of protein from Brazil-nut and soybean extracts and 3.7 μg of 2S albumin. The proteins were transferred from gels to nitrocellulose by electroblotting as described by Towbin et al.19 Nitrocellulose blots were incubated with control serum or individual serum samples from nine subjects allergic to Brazil nuts. IgE binding was detected by autoradiography after incubation of the washed blots with 125I-labeled antihuman IgE.20 Alternatively, gels obtained with SDS-PAGE were stained with Coomassie blue to visualize the proteins.21 α-Lactalbumin (14.4 kd), soybean trypsin inhibitor (20.1 kd), carbonic anhydrase (30 kd), ovalbumin (43 kd), bovine serum albumin (67 kd), and rabbit-muscle phosphorylase b (94 kd) served as molecular-weight markers.

Skin-Prick Testing with Transgenic Material

Extracts for skin-prick (epicutaneous) testing were prepared from Brazil nuts, transgenic soybeans, and nontransgenic soybeans obtained from the sources described above. These materials were not defatted. They were prepared (1:10 wt/vol) with 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, and rocked overnight at 4°C. The extracts were clarified by ultracentrifugation at 82,000×g for one hour and filtered through a series of 0.45-μm and 0.2-μm sterile filters. The filtrates were collected in sterile vials containing an equal volume of sterile glycerol, mixed, and stored at 4°C until use. Immediately before use, serial dilutions of sterile extracts (1:100 to 1:1,000,000 vol/vol) as well as a 1:50 dilution were prepared with a saline diluent (0.9 percent sodium chloride, 0.03 percent albumin, and 0.04 percent phenol; Miles Laboratories, Spokane, Wash.).

Skin-prick testing was performed according to the method of Norman.22 A histamine base solution (1.8 mg per milliliter and 50 percent glycerol wt/vol; Allermed, San Diego, Calif.) and saline diluent were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Titration was conducted starting with the most dilute extracts (1:1,000,000) and progressing through serial dilutions until a positive response (3-mm wheal) was observed in subjects allergic to Brazil nuts. Subjects acting as negative controls underwent skin-prick testing with full-strength extracts and negative- and positive-control solutions as described above. The diameter of the wheal-and-flare response was measured 10 minutes after the skin was pricked. The subjects were asked to refrain from taking antihistamines or other medications that could interfere with skin-test responses for a minimum of 48 hours before testing.

Results

An extract of transgenic soybean competed effectively with Brazil-nut proteins that were bound to solid-phase, microcrystalline cellulose for binding to IgE from the serum of subjects allergic to Brazil nuts (Figure 1Figure 1Results of Radioallergosorbent Assays with Extracts of Nontransgenic Soybean (▲), Transgenic Soybean (■), and Brazil Nut (●).). The degree of inhibition observed with the extract of transgenic soybean was similar to that observed with an extract of raw Brazil nut (Figure 1). No inhibition was encountered with an extract from nontransgenic soybean that has the same genetic background as the transgenic plant and similar levels of protein. This result indicates that the inhibition by the transgenic-soybean extract was not due to normal soybean proteins or to the nonspecific binding of 125I-labeled antihuman IgE to soybean extract. The parallel inhibition slopes obtained with extracts of transgenic soybean and Brazil nut indicate considerable similarity between the IgE-binding epitopes in these two extracts.

IgE from eight of the nine subjects allergic to Brazil nuts bound to purified 2S albumin from the Brazil nut (molecular weight, 9000)18 and to a 9-kd protein in an extract of whole Brazil nut (Figure 2AFigure 2Results of SDS–PAGE and Autoradiography. and Figure 2B). IgE from seven of the nine subjects allergic to Brazil nuts also bound to a transgenic-soybean protein that migrated with the 2S albumin and that was absent from nontransgenic-soybean extract (Figure 2B). Serum from two of these subjects showed very weak binding to proteins in nontransgenic soybeans, but these proteins did not migrate with the 2S albumin. No binding was observed with serum from control subjects. IgE from the serum of five of the nine subjects allergic to Brazil nuts also bound to a protein of approximately 12 kd that was present in some transgenic-soybean extracts (Figure 2C). The two bands seen in lane 1 of Figure 2C are most likely the 12-kd protein intermediate and the mature 9-kd subunit of the 2S albumin.8

In addition to the 2S albumin, the transgenic soybean contained proteins encoded by two bacterial marker genes: neomycin phosphotransferase and β-glucuronidase. Purified commercial preparations of neomycin phosphotransferase and β-glucuronidase denatured with sodium dodecyl sulfate did not bind IgE from the serum of subjects allergic to Brazil nuts. IgE from the serum of six of these nine subjects bound to other Brazil-nut proteins. The identities of these other proteins are not known. In one case, IgE did not bind detectably to the 2S albumin but instead recognized a 42-kd protein (Figure 2D). In another case, IgE bound to both the 2S albumin and the 42-kd protein (data not shown), although the binding to the 2S albumin was much stronger; this sub ject's serum also recognized minor IgE-binding proteins of 21, 25, 39, and 57 kd, with comparatively much weaker binding, in Brazil nuts. In all other cases, binding to other Brazil-nut proteins was not very strong, and there was no consistent pattern to these individual responses.

Three subjects with histories of hypersensitivity to Brazil nuts and no history of hypersensitivity to soybeans underwent skin-prick testing. All three had positive reactions to the transgenic-soybean and Brazil-nut extracts at dilutions ranging from 1:1,000,000 to 1:1000 (Table 1Table 1Results of Skin-Prick Tests in Three Subjects Allergic to Brazil Nuts.). A representative reaction is shown in Figure 3Figure 3Reactivity on Skin-Prick Testing to Extracts of Transgenic Soybean, Nontransgenic Soybean, and Brazil Nut in a Subject Allergic to Brazil Nuts.. All three had positive responses to the histamine control and no response to the saline diluent and the nontransgenic-soybean extract. Three control subjects had no reaction to full-strength extracts of Brazil nut, transgenic soybean, and soybean or to saline diluent and had a positive response to the histamine control.

Discussion

The 2S albumin from the Brazil nut is very likely a major allergen. Major allergens are proteins that bind substantially to IgE from more than 50 percent of the patients with that specific allergy. In this case, serum from eight of nine subjects allergic to Brazil nuts recognized the 2S albumin as a major IgE-binding protein of the Brazil nut, and this protein was by far the strongest IgE-binding protein in seven of the eight subjects. IgE from these seven subjects also bound to the 2S albumin in transgenic soybeans, which carry the Brazil-nut 2S albumin gene. Furthermore, skin-prick tests with extracts of transgenic soybean were positive in the three subjects allergic to Brazil nuts who were tested, whereas tests with nontransgenic-soybean extract were negative. Oral challenges would be necessary to confirm the allergenicity of the 2S albumin; however, they would pose a risk to this group of subjects, most of whom experience life-threatening symptoms on inadvertent consumption of Brazil nuts.

Recently, Melo et al.23 concluded on the basis of experiments in animals that the 2S albumin from the Brazil nut was not a major allergen. However, the ability of a protein to induce an IgG1 response in animals is not always a good indicator of the ability of that protein to induce an IgE response in humans. We consider that our evidence justifies the designation of the 2S albumin from the Brazil nut as a major Brazil-nut allergen, Ber e1.24 Food derived from new plant varieties, including soybeans, that are likely to contain Ber e1 should be appropriately labeled to alert consumers, in compliance with FDA policy. Our findings demonstrate the transfer of a major food allergen during the development of improved crop varieties through genetic engineering.

We also detected some binding of IgE to other Brazil-nut and soybean proteins in tests with serum from one or more of the subjects who were allergic to Brazil nuts. Binding to a 12-kd protein from the transgenic soybean (Figure 2C) can be explained by the fact that the 2S albumin in Brazil nuts is known to be composed of 9-kd and 3-kd subunits that are processed from a 17-kd precursor protein by means of a 12-kd intermediate.8 In transgenic soybeans, this processing is often incomplete, resulting in the accumulation of the 12-kd intermediate (unpublished data). The 42-kd protein from the Brazil nut was the primary allergen for one of the nine subjects who were allergic to Brazil nuts. However, this allergen is not a major Brazil-nut allergen because most subjects allergic to Brazil nuts who were tested in our study did not have IgE specific for this protein. With other plant foods, such as peanuts and soybeans, numerous IgE-binding proteins are detected,20,25 and the identification of the major IgE-binding proteins can be problematic. In the case of animal foods, such as shrimp and cod, multiple IgE-binding proteins are detected, but one predominant IgE-binding protein is usually easily identifiable.26,27

It is prudent to assess the allergenicity of proteins in transgenic foods if those proteins have been derived from sources that are commonly allergenic. The use of currently available animal models alone to predict allergenicity in humans does not produce accurate results. Techniques such as radioallergosorbent tests, SDS-PAGE with immunoblotting, and skin-prick testing can identify IgE-binding proteins that are probable allergens in transgenic foods derived from sources known to be allergenic. This strategy will not be useful in assessing the allergenicity of transgenic foods in which the allergenicity of the source of donor genetic material is unknown. Most current applications in the field of plant biotechnology fall into the latter category.

Supported by a grant from Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.

Source Information

From the Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln (J.A.N., S.L.T.); Research and Product Development, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Johnston, Iowa (J.A.T., L.A.T.); and William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Affairs Hospital and the Department of Medicine and Food Research Institute, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison (R.K.B.).

Address reprint requests to Ms. Nordlee at the Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0919.

References

References

  1. 1

    Taylor SL. Chemistry and detection of food allergens. Food Tech 1992;46:146-152
    Web of Science

  2. 2

    Arshad SH, Malmberg E, Krapf K, Hide DW. Clinical and immunological characteristics of Brazil nut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 1991;21:373-376
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Fox JL. FDA attacks food allergens. Biotechnology 1994;12:568-569
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Carey B. Tasty tomatoes: now there's a concept. Health (N Y) 1993;7:24-28

  5. 5

    Snyder J. The splice of life: will gene-altered foods help us live longer? Longevity 1992;4:52-57

  6. 6

    Statement of policy: foods derived from new plant varietiesFed Regist 1992;57:22984-23005

  7. 7

    Utsumi S. Plant food protein engineering. In: Kinsella J, ed. Advances in food and nutrition research. Vol. 36. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press, 1992:89-208.

  8. 8

    Altenbach SB, Pearson KW, Leung FW, Sun SSM. Cloning and sequence analysis of a cDNA encoding a Brazil nut protein exceptionally rich in methionine. Plant Mol Biol 1987;8:239-250
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  9. 9

    Townsend JA, Thomas LA. Factors which influence the Agrobacteriummediated transformation of soybean. J Cell Biochem 1994;18:78-78 abstract.

  10. 10

    Altenbach SB, Pearson KW, Meeker G, Staraci LC, Sun SSM. Enhancement of the methionine content of seed proteins by the expression of a chimeric gene encoding a methionine-rich protein in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol 1989;13:513-522
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Altenbach SB, Kuo CC, Staraci LC, et al. Accumulation of a Brazil nut albumin in seeds of transgenic canola results in enhanced levels of seed protein methionine. Plant Mol Biol 1992;18:235-245
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Guerche P, De Almeida ERP, Schwarztein MA, Gander E, Krebbers E, Pelletier G. Expression of the 2S albumin from Bertholletia excelsa in Brassica napus. Mol Gen Genet 1990;221:306-314
    CrossRef | Medline

  13. 13

    Saalbach I, Pickardt T, Machemehl F, Saalbach G, Schieder O, Muntz K. A chimeric gene encoding the methionine-rich 2S albumin of the Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa H.B.K.) is stably expressed and inherited in transgenic grain legumes. Mol Gen Genet 1994;242:226-236
    CrossRef | Medline

  14. 14

    Aragao FJL, de Sa FM, Almeida ER, Gander ES, Rech EL. Particle bombardment-mediated transient expression of a Brazil nut methionine-rich albumin in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Mol Biol 1992;20:357-359
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Nordlee JA, Taylor SL, Jones RT, Yunginger JW. Allergenicity of various peanut products as determined by RAST inhibition. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1981;68:376-382
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951;193:265-275
    Web of Science | Medline

  17. 17

    Adolphson CR, Gleich GJ, Yunginger JW. Standardization of allergens. In: Rose NR, Friedman H, Fahey JL, eds. Manual of clinical laboratory immunology. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology, 1986:652-9.

  18. 18

    Sun SSM, Leung FW, Tomic JC. Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa H. B. K.) proteins: fractionation, composition, and identification of a sulfur-rich protein. J Agric Food Chem 1987;35:232-235
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  19. 19

    Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979;76:4350-4354
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Herian AM, Taylor SL, Bush RK. Identification of soybean allergens by immunoblotting with sera from soy-allergic adults. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1990;92:193-198
    CrossRef | Medline

  21. 21

    Hames BD. An introduction to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In: Hames BD, Rickwood D, eds. Gel electrophoresis of proteins: a practical approach. Oxford, England: IRL Press, 1981:1-91.

  22. 22

    Norman PS. Skin testing. In: Rose NR, Friedman H, Fahey JL, eds. Manual of clinical laboratory immunology. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology, 1986:660-3.

  23. 23

    Melo VMM, Xavier-Filho J, Lima MS, Prouvost-Dannon A. Allergenicity and tolerance to proteins from Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa H.B.K.). Food Agric Immunol 1994;6:185-195
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    King TP, Hoffman D, Lowenstein H, Marsh DG, Platts-Mills TA, Thomas W. Allergen nomenclature. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1994;105:224-233
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Barnett D, Baldo BA, Howden MEH. Multiplicity of allergens in peanuts. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1983;72:61-68
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Lehrer SB. The complex nature of food antigens: studies of cross-reacting crustacea allergens. Ann Allergy 1986;57:267-272
    Medline

  27. 27

    Aukrust L, Apold J, Elsayed S, Aas K. Crossed immunoelectrophoretic and crossed radioimmunoelectrophoretic studies employing a model allergen from codfish. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1978;57:253-262
    CrossRef | Medline

Citing Articles (186)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Marcos Alcocer, Louise Rundqvist, Göran Larsson. (2011) Ber e 1 protein: the versatile major allergen from Brazil nut seeds. Biotechnology Letters
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Ademola A. Adenle. (2011) Global capture of crop biotechnology in developing world over a decade. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Alison L Van Eenennaam, William M Muir. (2011) Transgenic salmon: a final leap to the grocery shelf?. Nature Biotechnology 29:8, 706-710
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Richard E. Goodman, Afua O. Tetteh. (2011) Suggested Improvements for the Allergenicity Assessment of Genetically Modified Plants Used in Foods. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports 11:4, 317-324
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    H. Schumacher, H. M. Paulsen, A. E. Gau, W. Link, H. U. Jürgens, O. Sass, R. Dieterich. (2011) Seed protein amino acid composition of important local grain legumes Lupinus angustifolius L., Lupinus luteus L., Pisum sativum L. and Vicia faba L.. Plant Breeding 130:2, 156-164
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Eliot M Herman, A. Wesley Burks. (2011) The impact of plant biotechnology on food allergy. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 22:2, 224-230
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Shiv Kumar, G. Bejiga, S. Ahmed, H. Nakkoul, A. Sarker. (2011) Genetic improvement of grass pea for low neurotoxin (β-ODAP) content. Food and Chemical Toxicology 49:3, 589-600
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    M.C. van Putten, G.A. Kleter, L.J.W.J. Gilissen, B. Gremmen, H.J. Wichers, L.J. Frewer. (2011) Novel foods and allergy: Regulations and risk-benefit assessment. Food Control 22:2, 143-157
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Ademola A Adenle. (2011) Response to issues on GM agriculture in Africa: Are transgenic crops safe?. BMC Research Notes 4:1, 388
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Piero Morandini. (2010) Inactivation of allergens and toxins. New Biotechnology 27:5, 482-493
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    S. Chakraborty, N. Chakraborty, L. Agrawal, S. Ghosh, K. Narula, S. Shekhar, P. S. Naik, P. C. Pande, S. K. Chakrborti, A. Datta. (2010) Next-generation protein-rich potato expressing the seed protein gene AmA1 is a result of proteome rebalancing in transgenic tuber. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:41, 17533-17538
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Andrea Borchers, Suzanne S. Teuber, Carl L. Keen, M. Eric Gershwin. (2010) Food Safety. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology 39:2, 95-141
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Sahul H. Rajamohamed, Joyce I. Boye. 2010. Processing Foods without Peanuts and Tree Nuts. , 289-331.
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Marko Ahteensuu. (2010) Agricultural Biotechnology and the Precautionary Principle. Sociology Compass 4:8, 616-627
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Hisabumi Takase. 2010. The Improvement and Enhancement of Phyto-Ingredients Using New Technology of Genetic Recombination. , 157-180.
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Trichi Saukshmya, Archana Chugh. (2010) Commercializing synthetic biology: Socio-ethical concerns and challenges under intellectual property regime. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 16:2, 135-158
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Bryan Delaney. 2009. Safety Assessment of Foods Obtained from Crops Developed Using Biotechnology. .
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Abinav K. Singh, Shelly Praveen, Bhanu P. Singh, Anupam Varma, Naveen Arora. (2009) Safety assessment of leaf curl virus resistant tomato developed using viral derived sequences. Transgenic Research 18:6, 877-887
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Rita Batista, Maria Margarida Oliveira. (2009) Facts and fiction of genetically engineered food. Trends in Biotechnology 27:5, 277-286
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Guihua Lu, Eric Hoeft. 2009. Sunflower. .
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Nancy Terryn, Marc Van Montagu, Mukund Zambre, Geert Angenon. 2009. Tepary Bean. .
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Francisco J.L. Arago, Josias C. Faria, Maria J. Del Peloso, Leonardo C. Melo, Rosana P.V. Brondani. 2009. Common Bean. .
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Jennifer Tallman, Jian Zhang, Guihua Lu, Feng Han, Theodore M. Klein. 2009. Soybean. .
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Olivier Le Curieux-Belfond, Louise Vandelac, Joseph Caron, Gilles-Éric Séralini. (2009) Factors to consider before production and commercialization of aquatic genetically modified organisms: the case of transgenic salmon. Environmental Science & Policy 12:2, 170-189
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Artemis Dona, Ioannis S. Arvanitoyannis. (2009) Health Risks of Genetically Modified Foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 49:2, 164-175
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    2009. Food biotechnology. , 229-270.
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    A OFORIANTI, H ARIYARATHNA, L CHEN, H LEE, S PRAMOD, R GOODMAN. (2008) Establishing objective detection limits for the pepsin digestion assay used in the assessment of genetically modified foods. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 52:2, 94-103
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Stephanie Bachas-Daunert, Sapna K. Deo. (2008) Should genetically modified foods be abandoned on the basis of allergenicity?. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 392:3, 341-346
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Richard E. Goodman. (2008) Performing IgE serum testing due to bioinformatics matches in the allergenicity assessment of GM crops. Food and Chemical Toxicology 46:10, S24-S34
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    B Chassy. 2008. Food Safety of Transgenic Rice. , 417-455.
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Eva Untersmayr, Erika Jensen-Jarolim. (2008) The role of protein digestibility and antacids on food allergy outcomes. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 121:6, 1301-1308
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Peggy G. Lemaux. (2008) Genetically Engineered Plants and Foods: A Scientist's Analysis of the Issues (Part I). Annual Review of Plant Biology 59:1, 771-812
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Nancy Terryn, Marc van Montagu. 2008. Genetic Transformation of Phaseolus and Vigna Species. , 159-168.
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Qungang Qi, Henry Valentin. 2008. Biotechnological Approaches to Soybean Improvement. , 69-88.
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    (2008) Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: The role of animal feeding trials. Food and Chemical Toxicology 46, S2-S70
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Audrey Darrigues, Kendall R. Lamkey, M. Paul Scott. 2008. Breeding for Grain Amino Acid Composition in Maize. , 335-344.
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Earl H. Bicar, Wendy Woodman-Clikeman, Varaporn Sangtong, Joan M. Peterson, S. Samuel Yang, Michael Lee, M. Paul Scott. (2008) Transgenic maize endosperm containing a milk protein has improved amino acid balance. Transgenic Research 17:1, 59-71
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    E KOK, J KEIJER, G KLETER, H KUIPER. (2008) Comparative safety assessment of plant-derived foods. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 50:1, 98-113
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    (2008) Chapter 2: Recent Developments in the Safety and Nutritional Assessment of Nutritionally Improved Foods and Feeds. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 7:1, 65-74
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Anna C. N. CHUA, Eric S. L. HSIAO, Yuan-Chang YANG, Li-Jen LIN, Wing-Ming CHOU, Jason T. C. TZEN. (2008) Gene Families Encoding 11S Globulin and 2S Albumin Isoforms of Jelly Fig (Ficus awkeotsang) Achenes. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 72:2, 506-513
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Richard E Goodman, Stefan Vieths, Hugh A Sampson, David Hill, Motohiro Ebisawa, Steve L Taylor, Ronald van Ree. (2008) Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops—what makes sense?. Nature Biotechnology 26:1, 73-81
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Peter R. Shewry. (2007) Improving the protein content and composition of cereal grain. Journal of Cereal Science 46:3, 239-250
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Alan McHughen, Stuart Smyth. (2007) US regulatory system for genetically modified [genetically modified organism (GMO), rDNA or transgenic] crop cultivars. Plant Biotechnology Journal 0:0, 071024233955001-???
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    H. A. El-Shemy, M. M. Khalafalla, K. Fujita, M. Ishimoto. (2007) Improvement of protein quality in transgenic soybean plants. Biologia Plantarum 51:2, 277-284
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Theodoros H. Varzakas, Ioannis S. Arvanitoyannis, Haralambos Baltas. (2007) The Politics and Science Behind GMO Acceptance. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 47:4, 335-361
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Penelope Amelia Claire Sparrow, Judith A. Irwin, Phil J. Dale, Richard M. Twyman, Julian K. C. Ma. (2007) Pharma-Planta: road testing the developing regulatory guidelines for plant-made pharmaceuticals. Transgenic Research 16:2, 147-161
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    V. M. Quecini, A. C. Alves, C. A. Oliveira, F. J. L. Aragão, E. L. Rech, E. R. P. Almeida, E. S. Gander, M. L. C. Vieira. (2006) Microparticle bombardment of Stylosanthes guianensis: transformation parameters and expression of a methionine-rich 2S albumin gene. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 87:2, 167-179
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    RAFAAT MOHAMED EL SAYED SOLIMAN EL-SANHOTY, AFAF DESOKY ABD EL-MAGED, MOHAMED FAWZY RAMADAN. (2006) SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED POTATO SPUNTA: DEGRADATION OF DNA IN GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT AND CARRYOVER TO RAT ORGANS. Journal of Food Biochemistry 30:5, 556-578
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Om V. Singh, Shivani Ghai, Debarati Paul, Rakesh K. Jain. (2006) Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 71:5, 598-607
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Vanessa E. Prescott, Simon P. Hogan. (2006) Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: Usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 111:2, 374-383
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Marc Beauregard, Mary Alice Hefford. (2006) Enhancement of essential amino acid contents in crops by genetic engineering and protein design. Plant Biotechnology Journal 0:0, 060706010328001-???
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Steve L. Taylor. (2006) Review of the development of methodology for evaluating the human allergenic potential of novel proteins. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 50:7, 604-609
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    A. K. Singh, A. K. Mehta, S. Sridhara, S. N. Gaur, B. P. Singh, P. U. Sarma, N. Arora. (2006) Allergenicity assessment of transgenic mustard (Brassica juncea) expressing bacterial codA gene. Allergy 61:4, 491-497
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    G LADICS, L BARDINA, R CRESSMAN, J MATTSSON, H SAMPSON. (2006) Lack of cross-reactivity between the Bacillus thuringiensis derived protein Cry1F in maize grain and dust mite Der p7 protein with human sera positive for Der p7-IgE. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 44:2, 136-143
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Tuija J. Puumalainen, Sanna Poikonen, Annika Kotovuori, Kirsi Vaali, Nisse Kalkkinen, Timo Reunala, Kristiina Turjanmaa, Timo Palosuo. (2006) Napins, 2S albumins, are major allergens in oilseed rape and turnip rape. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 117:2, 426-432
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    D. R. Panthee, V. R. Pantalone, C. E. Sams, A. M. Saxton, D. R. West, J. H. Orf, A. S. Killam. (2006) Quantitative trait loci controlling sulfur containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine, in soybean seeds. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112:3, 546-553
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    S. Ridout, S. Matthews, C. Gant, R. Twiselton, T. Dean, S. H. Arshad. (2006) The diagnosis of Brazil nut allergy using history, skin prick tests, serum-specific immunoglobulin E and food challenges. Clinical <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Experimental Allergy 36:2, 226-232
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    H. Breiteneder. 2006. Classifying food allergens. , 21-61.
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Jing Lin, Peter R. Shewry, David B. Archer, Kirsten Beyer, Bodo Niggemann, Helmut Haas, Philip Wilson, Marcos J.C. Alcocer. (2006) The Potential Allergenicity of Two 2S Albumins from Soybean <i>(Glycine max)</i>: A Protein Microarray Approach. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 141:2, 91-102
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    S. Koppelman. 2006. Detecting tree nuts and seeds in food. , 201-218.
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Peter Celec, Martina Kukučková, Veronika Renczésová, Satheesh Natarajan, Roland Pálffy, Roman Gardlík, Július Hodosy, Michal Behuliak, Barbora Vlková, Gabriel Minárik, Tomáš Szemes, Stanislav Stuchlík, Ján Turňa. (2005) Biological and biomedical aspects of genetically modified food. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 59:10, 531-540
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Clive Meredith. (2005) Allergenic potential of novel foods. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 64:04, 487-490
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    Steve Taylor, Susan Hefle. 2005. Introduction to Food Allergy. , 393-410.
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Dean D Metcalfe. (2005) Genetically modified crops and allergenicity. Nature Immunology 6:9, 857-860
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Mondher Bouzayen, Jean-Claude Pech, Anne Bernadac, Alain Latché. 2005. Use of Genetic Engineering to Control Ripening, Reduce Spoilage, and Maintain Quality of Fruits and Vegetables. , 397-438.
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Shavindra Bajaj, Amitabh Mohanty. (2005) Recent advances in rice biotechnology-towards genetically superior transgenic rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal 3:3, 275-307
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    S. B. Lehrer, G. A. Bannon. (2005) Risks of allergic reactions to biotech proteins in foods: perception and reality. Allergy 60:5, 559-564
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Felicity Goodyear-Smith. 2005. Safety Concerns of Genetically Modified Foods. .
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Finn Bowring. (2005) Michael Fumento, Bioevolution: How Biotechnology is Changing Our World. Politics and the Life Sciences 24:1 &amp; 2, 92-94
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Shannon Wilson, Kristen Blaschek, Elvira Gonzalez Mejia. (2005) Allergenic Proteins in Soybean: Processing and Reduction of P34 Allergenicity. Nutrition Reviews 63:2, 47-58
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Ravigadevi Sambanthamurthi, Sharifah Shahrul, G Ahmad Parveez. 2005. Safety, Regulatory Aspects, and Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Lipids. .
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Armin Sp&ouml;k, Helmut Gaugitsch, Sylvia Laffer, Gabrielle Pauli, Hirohisa Saito, Hugh Sampson, Elopy Sibanda, Wayne Thomas, Marianne van Hage, Rudolf Valenta. (2005) Suggestions for the Assessment of the Allergenic Potential of Genetically Modified Organisms. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 137:2, 167-180
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Riccardo Asero. (2005) Plant Food Allergies: A Suggested Approach to Allergen-Resolved Diagnosis in the Clinical Practice by Identifying Easily Available Sensitization Markers. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 138:1, 1-11
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Gregory Jaffe. (2005) Implementing the Cartagena Biosafety Protocol through national biosafety regulatory systems: an analysis of key unresolved issues. Journal of Public Affairs 5:3-4, 299-311
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Tetsuo Saito, Tadashi Miyata. (2005) Situation and Problems on Transgenic Technology for Insect Pest Control.. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 49:4, 171-185
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Richard E. Goodman, Susan L. Hefle, Steven L. Taylor, Ronald van Ree. (2005) Assessing Genetically Modified Crops to Minimize the Risk of Increased Food Allergy: A Review. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 137:2, 153-166
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Samuel B. Lehrer. (2004) Genetic modification of food allergens. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 93:5, S19-S25
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    E. N. CLARE MILLS, JOHN A. JENKINS, MARCOS J. C. ALCOCER, PETER R. SHEWRY. (2004) Structural, Biological, and Evolutionary Relationships of Plant Food Allergens Sensitizing via the Gastrointestinal Tract. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 44:5, 379-407
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Eliot Herman. 2004. Allergenic Reponses to Legume Proteins. .
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    N.D. Hagan, T.J.V. Higgins. 2004. Storage Proteins and their Metabolism. .
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    A. König, A. Cockburn, R.W.R. Crevel, E. Debruyne, R. Grafstroem, U. Hammerling, I. Kimber, I. Knudsen, H.A. Kuiper, A.A.C.M. Peijnenburg, A.H. Penninks, M. Poulsen, M. Schauzu, J.M. Wal. (2004) Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. Food and Chemical Toxicology 42:7, 1047-1088
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    (2004) Evaluation of Safety for the Supplement of Herbicide-resistant Rice in Old Male Rats. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 33:5, 810-814
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Hanne R. Christensen, Susanne Brix, Hanne Frøkiær. (2004) Immune response in mice to ingested soya protein: antibody production, oral tolerance and maternal transfer. British Journal of Nutrition 91:05, 725
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    F.Javier Moreno, John A. Jenkins, Fred A. Mellon, Neil M. Rigby, James A. Robertson, Nikolaus Wellner, E.N. Clare Mills. (2004) Mass spectrometry and structural characterization of 2S albumin isoforms from Brazil nuts (Bertholletia excelsa). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins & Proteomics 1698:2, 175-186
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    Won-Seok Kim, Hari B. Krishnan. (2004) Expression of an 11 kDa methionine-rich delta-zein in transgenic soybean results in the formation of two types of novel protein bodies in transitional cells situated between the vascular tissue and storage parenchyma cells. Plant Biotechnology Journal 2:3, 199-210
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Jing Lin, Roger Fido, Peter Shewry, David B. Archer, Marcos J.C. Alcocer. (2004) The expression and processing of two recombinant 2S albumins from soybean (Glycine max) in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins & Proteomics 1698:2, 203-212
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    (2004) Nutritional and Safety Assessments of Foods and Feeds Nutritionally Improved through Biotechnology: An Executive Summary A Task Force Report by the International Life Sciences Institute, Washington, D.C.. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 3:2, 35-104
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Samuel S. M. Sun, Qiaoquan Liu. (2004) Transgenic approaches to improve the nutritional quality of plant proteins. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 40:2, 155-162
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    Mingjuan Tang, Ye Shen, Yuanlei Hu, Lei Cao, Ting Ni, Hongyu Zhang, Zhongping Lin. (2004) Allergenicity assay of allergen fromDermatophagoides farinae in transgenic tobacco. Chinese Science Bulletin 49:5, 452-455
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Alfonso Clemente, Stephen J Chambers, Federica Lodi, Claudio Nicoletti, Gary M Brett. (2004) Use of the indirect competitive ELISA for the detection of Brazil nut in food products. Food Control 15:1, 65-69
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    EVA STEN, PER STAHL SKOV, SVEN B. ANDERSEN, ANNA MARIA TORP, ANNETTE OLESEN, ULLA BINDSLEV-JENSEN, BINDSLEV-JENSEN LARS K., CARSTEN BINDSLEV-JENSEN. (2004) A comparative study of the allergenic potency of wild-type and glyphosate-tolerant gene-modified soybean cultivars. APMIS 112:1, 21-28
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Andy Thorpe, Catherine Robinson. (2004) When goliaths clash: US and EU differences over the labeling of food products derived from genetically modified organisms. Agriculture and Human Values 21:4, 287-298
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    R. E. Poms, C. L. Klein, E. Anklam. (2004) Methods for allergen analysis in food: a review. Food Additives and Contaminants 21:1, 1-31
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    R. Codina, L. Ardusso, R. F. Lockey, C. Crisci, I. Medina. (2003) Allergenicity of varieties of soybean. Allergy 58:12, 1293-1298
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    Ragnar E. Lfstedt, Baruch Fischhoff, Ilya R. Fischhoff. (2003) Precautionary principles: general definitions and specific applications to genetically modified organisms. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21:3, 381-407
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    C Venter, S Arshad. 2003. Allergens in food. , 129-157.
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    N. Wolff, U. Cogan, A. Admon, I. Dalal, Y. Katz, N. Hodos, N. Karin, S. Yannai. (2003) Allergy to sesame in humans is associated primarily with IgE antibody to a 14 kDa 2S albumin precursor. Food and Chemical Toxicology 41:8, 1165-1174
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    G. J. Murtagh, D. B. Archer, M. Dumoulin, S. Ridout, S. Matthews, S. H. Arshad, M. J. C. Alcocer. (2003) In vitro stability and immunoreactivity of the native and recombinant plant food 2S albumins Ber e 1 and SFA-8. Clinical <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Experimental Allergy 33:8, 1147-1152
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Zhang-Liang Chen, Hongya Gu, Yi Li, Yilan Su, Ping Wu, Zhicheng Jiang, Xiaotian Ming, Jinhua Tian, Naisui Pan, Li-Jia Qu. (2003) Safety assessment for genetically modified sweet pepper and tomato. Toxicology 188:2-3, 297-307
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    Ricki M. Helm. (2003) Food biotechnology: is this good or bad? Implications to allergic diseases. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 90:6, 90-98
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Harry A Kuiper, Gijs A Kleter. (2003) 8. The scientific basis for risk assessment and regulation of genetically modified foods. Trends in Food Science & Technology 14:5-8, 277-293
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    F. Harding. (2003) CD4+ T cell epitope identification: applications to allergy. Clinical <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Experimental Allergy 33:5, 557-565
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    Cutberto Garza, Patrick Stover. (2003) 1. General introduction. Trends in Food Science & Technology 14:5-8, 182-190
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    Mikael Karlsson. (2003) Biosafety principles for GMOs in the context of sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 10:1, 15-26
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    S.H. De Boer. (2003) Perspective on genetic engineering of agricultural crops for resistance to disease. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 25:1, 10-20
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    Juan Alberto Osuna-Castro, Octavio Paredes-López. 2003. Introduction to Molecular Food Biotechnology. .
    CrossRef

  107. 107

    Tiger T. T. LEE, Miki M. C. WANG, Rolis C. W. HOU, Liang-Jwu CHEN, Ruey-Chih SU, Chang-Sheng WANG, Jason T. C. TZEN. (2003) Enhanced Methionine and Cysteine Levels in Transgenic Rice Seeds by the Accumulation of Sesame 2S Albumin. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 67:8, 1699-1705
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    Karen-Beth G. Scholthof. (2003) O NE F OOT IN THE F URROW : Linkages Between Agriculture, Plant Pathology, and Public Health. Annual Review of Public Health 24:1, 153-174
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    Anita Bakshi. (2003) Potential Adverse Health Effects of Genetically Modified Crops. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B 6:3, 211-226
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    Keith T Atherton. (2002) Safety assessment of genetically modified crops. Toxicology 181-182, 421-426
    CrossRef

  111. 111

    Hiroshi Nishiura, Hirohisa Imai, Hiroyuki Nakao, Hiromasa Tsukino, Yoshiki Kuroda, Takahiko Katoh. (2002) Genetically modified crops: consumer attitudes and trends in plant research in Japan. Food Service Technology 2:4, 183-189
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    David G Hattan, Linda S Kahl. (2002) Current developments in food additive toxicology in the USA. Toxicology 181-182, 417-420
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    Angelika Paschke, Matthias Besler. (2002) Stability of bovine allergens during food processing. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 89:6, 16-20
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    R. Asero, G. Mistrello, D. Roncarolo, S. Amato. (2002) Allergy to minor allergens of Brazil nut. Allergy 57:11, 1080-1081
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    Henry I. Miller. 2002. Agricultural Biotechnology, Law, and Food Biotechnology Regulation. .
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    Marion Nestle. 2002. Agricultural Biotechnology, Policy, and Nutrition. .
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    Doug J Hinchliffe, John D Kemp. (2002) β-Zein protein bodies sequester and protect the 18-kDa δ-zein protein from degradation. Plant Science 163:4, 741-752
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    Dean Metcalfe. 2002. Allergenicity of foods produced by genetic modification. .
    CrossRef

  119. 119

    Andrew Cockburn. (2002) Assuring the safety of genetically modified (GM) foods: the importance of an holistic, integrative approach. Journal of Biotechnology 98:1, 79-106
    CrossRef

  120. 120

    Peter Shewry. 2002. Improving the Nutritional Quality and Functional Properties of Seed Proteins by Genetic Engineering. .
    CrossRef

  121. 121

    E. A. Pastorello, V. Pravettoni, A. M. Calamari, E. Banfi, A. M. Robino. (2002) New plant-origin food allergens. Allergy 57:s72, 106-110
    CrossRef

  122. 122

    , G. Lack, M. Chapman, N. Kalsheker, V. King, C. Robinson, K. Venables. (2002) Report on the potential allergenicity of genetically modified organisms and their products. Clinical <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Experimental Allergy 32:8, 1131-1143
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    Steve L. Taylor, Susan L. Hefle. (2002) Genetically engineered foods: implications for food allergy. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2:3, 249-252
    CrossRef

  124. 124

    Jinsheng Lai, Joachim Messing. (2002) Increasing maize seed methionine by mRNA stability. The Plant Journal 30:4, 395-402
    CrossRef

  125. 125

    IAN C. LAMB. (2002) Application of the IFBC/ILSI Allergenicity Assessment Decision Tree. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 964:1, 117-127
    CrossRef

  126. 126

    Steve L. Taylor. (2002) P ROTEIN A LLERGENICITY A SSESSMENT OF F OODS P RODUCED T HROUGH A GRICULTURAL B IOTECHNOLOGY. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 42:1, 99-112
    CrossRef

  127. 127

    Chee Harn, Jae-Whune Kim. 2002. Generation of Transgenic Bean (Phaseolus species) Plants for Improvement of Nutritional Quality. .
    CrossRef

  128. 128

    Leo Horrigan, Robert S. Lawrence, Polly Walker. (2002) How Sustainable Agriculture Can Address the Environmental and Human Health Harms of Industrial Agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives 110:5, 445-456
    CrossRef

  129. 129

    Kiran K. Sharma, H. C. Sharma, N. Seetharama, Rodomiro Ortiz. (2002) Development and deployment of transgenic plants: Biosafety considerations. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 38:2, 106-115
    CrossRef

  130. 130

    K.-H. Engel, Th. Frenzel, A. Miller. (2002) Current and future benefits from the use of GM technology in food production. Toxicology Letters 127:1-3, 329-336
    CrossRef

  131. 131

    Gideon Lack. (2002) Clinical risk assessment of GM foods. Toxicology Letters 127:1-3, 337-340
    CrossRef

  132. 132

    A. Bernadac, A. Latché, J.-P. Roustan, M. Bouzayen, J.-C. Pech. 2002. Other fruit and vegetables. , 250-294.
    CrossRef

  133. 133

    Peter J. Sexton, Nam C. Paek, Seth L. Naeve, Richard M. Shibles. (2002) Sulfur Metabolism and Protein Quality of Soybean. Journal of Crop Production 5:1-2, 285-308
    CrossRef

  134. 134

    Luca Bucchini, Lynn R. Goldman. (2001) Starlink Corn: A Risk Analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives 110:1, 5-13
    CrossRef

  135. 135

    Thomas D. Trautman. (2001) Risk communication—the perceptions and realities. Food Additives and Contaminants 18:12, 1130-1134
    CrossRef

  136. 136

    J. RALPH BLANCHFIELD. (2001) GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE: DEALING WITH FOOD ALLERGENS IN INGREDIENTS. FOOD PROCESSING, RETAILING AND FOODSERVICE1. Foodservice Research International 13:2, 119-132
    CrossRef

  137. 137

    Sarah Oehlschlager, Paul Reece, Ann Brown, Elaine Hughson, Hez Hird, James Chisholm, Hilary Atkinson, Clive Meredith, Richard Pumphrey, Philip Wilson, Joanne Sunderland. (2001) Food allergy—towards predictive testing for novel foods. Food Additives and Contaminants 18:12, 1099-1107
    CrossRef

  138. 138

    Randy D. Dinkins, M. S. Srinivasa Reddy, Curtis A. Meurer, Bo Yan, Harold Trick, Françoise Thibaud-Nissen, John J. Finer, Wayne A. Parrott, Glenn B. Collins. (2001) Increased sulfur amino acids in soybean plants overexpressing the maize 15 kDa zein protein. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 37:6, 742-747
    CrossRef

  139. 139

    Ricki M. Helm. (2001) Allergy to Plant Seed Proteins. Journal of New Seeds 3:3, 37-60
    CrossRef

  140. 140

    Harry A. Kuiper, Gijs A. Kleter, Hub P. J. M. Noteborn, Esther J. Kok. (2001) Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. The Plant Journal 27:6, 503-528
    CrossRef

  141. 141

    Felicity Goodyear-Smith. (2001) Health and safety issues pertaining to genetically modified foods. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 25:4, 371-375
    CrossRef

  142. 142

    Ian Kimber, Rebecca J. Dearman. (2001) Can animal models predict food allergenicity?. Nutrition Bulletin 26:2, 127-131
    CrossRef

  143. 143

    Heimo Breiteneder, Christof Ebner. (2001) Atopic allergens of plant foods. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology 1:3, 261-267
    CrossRef

  144. 144

    Tae-Geum Kim, Ju Kim, Dae-Hyuk Kim, Moon-Sik Yang. (2001) Expression of nutritionally well-balanced protein, AmA1, inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering 6:3, 173-178
    CrossRef

  145. 145

    Karen-Beth G. Scholthof. (2001) The Chimerical World of Agricultural Biotechnology: Food Allergens, Labeling, and Communication. Phytopathology 91:6, 524-526
    CrossRef

  146. 146

    Elide A. Pastorello, Valerio Pravettoni, Chiara Trambaioli, Carlo Pompei, Oreste Brenna, Laura Farioli, Amedeo Conti. (2001) Lipid transfer proteins and 2S albumins as allergens. Allergy 56:s67, 45-47
    CrossRef

  147. 147

    Bevan E. B. Moseley. (2001) How to make foods safer - genetically modified foods. Allergy 56, 61-63
    CrossRef

  148. 148

    Sami L. Bahna. (2001) Unusual presentations of food allergy. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 86:4, 414-420
    CrossRef

  149. 149

    Ian Kimber, Rebecca J. Dearman. (2001) Food allergy: what are the issues?. Toxicology Letters 120:1-3, 165-170
    CrossRef

  150. 150

    Hari B. Krishnan. (2001) Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Soybean Seed Storage Proteins. Journal of New Seeds 2:3, 1-25
    CrossRef

  151. 151

    Mary W. Eubanks. 2000. The Origin of Maize: Evidence for Tripsacum Ancestry. , 15-66.
    CrossRef

  152. 152

    Steve Taylor, Susan Hefle, Barbara Gauger. 2000. Food Allergies and Sensitivities. .
    CrossRef

  153. 153

    (2000) Seeds Of Opportunity: An Assessment Of The Benefits, Safety, And Oversight Of Plant Genomics And Agricultural Biotechnology. Biotechnology Law Report 19:4, 449-536
    CrossRef

  154. 154

    Heimo Breiteneder, Christof Ebner. (2000) Molecular and biochemical classification of plant-derived food allergens. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 106:1, 27-36
    CrossRef

  155. 155

    Henry I Miller. (2000) Labeling of gene-spliced foods: a label we don’t need. Nutrition 16:7-8, 706-709
    CrossRef

  156. 156

    J. D. Kelly, S. L. Hefle. (2000) 2S methionine-rich protein (SSA) from sunflower seed isan IgE-binding protein*. Allergy 55:6, 556-559
    CrossRef

  157. 157

    Jörg Stetter, Folker Lieb. (2000) Innovation im Pflanzenschutz: Trends in der Forschung. Angewandte Chemie 112:10, 1792-1812
    CrossRef

  158. 158

    S Uzogara. (2000) The impact of genetic modification of human foods in the 21st century A review. Biotechnology Advances 18:3, 179-206
    CrossRef

  159. 159

    Manuel Mota, José Empis. (2000) Novel foods and food ingredients: what is the mission of scientists and technologists?. Trends in Food Science & Technology 11:4-5, 161-168
    CrossRef

  160. 160

    Matthew Metz. (2000) What Good Is Agricultural Biotechnology?. Journal of New Seeds 2:4, 59-71
    CrossRef

  161. 161

    D. G. Lindsay. 2000. Maximising the functional benefits of plant foods. , 183-208.
    CrossRef

  162. 162

    E. A. Pastorello, V. Pravettoni, C. Incorvaia, J. A. Bellanti. (1999) Food allergy: an update. Allergy 54, 43-45
    CrossRef

  163. 163

    (1999) Workshop Session: MONDAY, JUNE 3, 1996. Allergy 51:s31, 5-21
    CrossRef

  164. 164

    J.M. Borja*, B. Bartolome, E. Gomez, P.A. Galindo, F. Feo, R. Garcia. (1999) Anaphylaxis from Brazil nut. Allergy 54:9, 1007-1008
    CrossRef

  165. 165

    E.I. Opara, S.L. Oehlschlager, L. Day, S.A. Ridley, R. Vaughan, A.B. Hanley. (1999) An In Vitro Cell Based Model for Assessing the Potential of Allergens to Release Mediators Through the Cross-linking of IgE. Toxicology in Vitro 13:4-5, 811-815
    CrossRef

  166. 166

    P. J. Maughan, R. Philip, M. -J. Cho, J. M. Widholm, L. O. Vodkin. (1999) Biolistic transformation, expression, and inheritance of bovine β-casein in soybean (Glycine max). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 35:4, 344-349
    CrossRef

  167. 167

    Wolfgang van den Daele, Wolfgang Krohn. (1998) Experimental implementation as a linking mechanism in the process of innovation. Research Policy 27:8, 853-868
    CrossRef

  168. 168

    J. Bousquet, B. Björkstén, C. A. F. M. Bruijnzeel-Koomen, A. Huggett, C. Ortolani, J. O. Warner, M. Smith. (1998) Scientific criteria and the selection of allergenic foods for product labelling. Allergy 53, 3-21
    CrossRef

  169. 169

    E. A. Pastorello, C. Incorvaia, V. Pravettoni, L. Farioli, A. Conti, G. Viganò, F. Rivolta, M. Ispano, F. Rotondo, C. Ortolani. (1998) New allergens in fruits and vegetables. Allergy 53, 48-51
    CrossRef

  170. 170

    J. M. Wal, G. Pascal. (1998) Benefits and limits of different approaches for assessing the allergenic potential of novel foods. Allergy 53, 98-101
    CrossRef

  171. 171

    K. Nekarn. (1998) Management of food allergy. Allergy 53, 122-124
    CrossRef

  172. 172

    Jim M. Dunwell. (1998) Novel food products from genetically modified crop plants: methods and future prospects. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 33:3, 205-213
    CrossRef

  173. 173

    Steven M. Gendel. (1998) Assessing the potential allergenicity of new food proteins. Food Biotechnology 12:3, 175-185
    CrossRef

  174. 174

    Daisuke Yamauchi, Takao Minamikawa. (1998) Improvement of the nutritional quality of legume seed storage proteins by molecular breeding. Journal of Plant Research 111:1, 1-6
    CrossRef

  175. 175

    Sumiko ODANI, Shoji ODANI. (1998) Isolation and Primary Structure of a Methionine- and Cystine-rich Seed Protein of Cannabis sativa.. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 62:4, 650-654
    CrossRef

  176. 176

    ELIZABETH I. OPARA SARAH L. OEHLSCH. (1998) Immunoglobulin E mediated food allergy.Modelling and application of diagnostic and predictive tests for existing and novel foods. Biomarkers 3:1, 1-19
    CrossRef

  177. 177

    Milly Ryan-Harshman. (1997) Food biotechnology: food industry, nutrition and public health. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 56:03, 845-854
    CrossRef

  178. 178

    John A. Rothfus, Walter J. Wolf. (1997) Analogous salicylic acid affinity regions in serum albumin and soybean β-Conglycinin. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society 74:10, 1193-1201
    CrossRef

  179. 179

    A.C. Huggett, C. Conzelmann. (1997) EU regulation on novel foods: Consequences for the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology 8:5, 133-139
    CrossRef

  180. 180

    Arnaldo Cantani, Patrizia Lucenti. (1997) Natural history of soy allergy and/or intolerance in children, and clinical use of soy-protein formulas. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 8:2, 59-74
    CrossRef

  181. 181

    E. A. Pastorello, V. Pravettoni, C. Incorvaia, J. A. Bellanti. (1996) Food allergy: an update. Allergy 54:s58, 43-45
    CrossRef

  182. 182

    Steve L. Taylor, Samuel B. Lehrer. (1996) Principles and characteristics of food allergens. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 36:sup001, 91-118
    CrossRef

  183. 183

    James D. Astwood, John N. Leach, Roy L. Fuchs. (1996) Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro. Nature Biotechnology 14:10, 1269-1273
    CrossRef

  184. 184

    Samuel B. Lehrer, W. Elliott Horner, Gerald Reese, Steven Taylor. (1996) Why are some proteins allergenic? Implications for biotechnology. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 36:6, 553-564
    CrossRef

  185. 185

    James D. Astwood, Roy L. Fuchs. (1996) Preventing food allergy: Emerging technologies. Trends in Food Science & Technology 7:7, 219-226
    CrossRef

  186. 186

    Nestle, Marion, . (1996) Allergies to Transgenic Foods — Questions of Policy. New England Journal of Medicine 334:11, 726-728
    Full Text