Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Special Article

The Costs of Visits to Emergency Departments

Robert M. Williams, M.D., Dr.P.H.

N Engl J Med 1996; 334:642-646March 7, 1996

Abstract

Background

Many visits to emergency departments are for minor medical problems, and these visits are criticized as being expensive and economically inefficient. This study examines the marginal costs (the extra costs for an additional visit) of emergency department visits.

Methods

Monthly data on the costs of hospital and physicians' services from 1991 through 1993 were obtained from a sample of six community hospitals in Michigan. The data were analyzed with ordinary least-squares regression techniques to determine the ratio of marginal to average costs. Average and marginal costs were then determined for 24,010 visits during 12 randomly selected weeks in 1993. A visit by an individual patient was the unit of analysis, and visits were classified as nonurgent, semiurgent, or urgent according to explicit criteria. Costs and charges were determined for all visits and were classified according to the degree of urgency.

Results

For all emergency department visits, the average charge was $383, the average cost was $209, and the marginal cost was $88 (42 percent of the average cost). Thirty-two percent of the visits were classified as nonurgent, 26 percent as semiurgent, and 42 percent as urgent. For nonurgent visits, the average charge was $124, the average cost was $62, and the marginal cost was only $24. For semiurgent visits, the average charge was $312, the average cost was $159, and the marginal cost was $67. For urgent visits, the average charge was $621, the average cost was $351, and the marginal cost was $148.

Conclusions

The true costs of nonurgent care in the emergency department are relatively low. The potential savings from a diversion of nonurgent visits to private physicians' offices may therefore be much less than is widely believed.

Media in This Article

Table 1Characteristics of Visits to the Six Emergency Departments Studied.
Table 2Characteristics of Emergency Department Visits According to the Urgency of the Medical Problem.
Article

The costs of services provided by hospital emergency departments have become a major concern. Patients complain about the high costs of health care. President Bill Clinton has referred to emergency departments as “the most expensive place of all.”1 It is widely believed that about half of all visits to emergency departments are for minor medical problems and that the cost of a nonurgent visit to an emergency department is triple the cost of a visit to a physician's office.2,3 Diverting nonurgent visits from emergency departments to private physicians' offices is viewed as a way to gain substantial savings.4

Visits to hospital emergency departments continue to increase. In 1993 the General Accounting Office reported that emergency department use had increased by 19 percent from 1985 to 1990, with 99.6 million visits to emergency departments in 1990.5 There was a 34 percent increase in visits by patients with Medicaid, a 29 percent increase in visits by patients with Medicare, and a 15 percent increase in visits by uninsured patients.

Several authors have pointed out the need for a methodologically sound study of emergency department costs.6,7 Yet a comparison of the costs of services at private physicians' offices and in hospital emergency departments is complex. A simple comparison of charges provides a very distorted basis for a cost analysis. An accurate comparison can be made only by examining the actual costs of providing services in the two settings. Furthermore, the terminology of costs can be confusing and is inconsistent in the literature. Fixed costs are defined as those that are not dependent on volume, and variable costs as those that are dependent on volume. Fixed and variable costs may be either direct, such as the costs for medical staff, ancillary services, and supplies, or indirect, such as overhead and administrative costs.

The marginal cost can be defined as the extra cost for one additional visit.8 For example, there is very little marginal or extra cost involved in squeezing in a visit by a 12-year-old patient with acute asthma at a private physician's office at 4 in the afternoon. At 4 in the morning, however, the marginal cost of a visit to a physician's office by the same patient with asthma would be very high because of the inconvenience and expense of opening the office at a time when it is normally closed. In contrast, the marginal cost of seeing a patient with asthma in the emergency department at 4 a.m. is small, because the early morning is usually a slack period, yet the emergency department remains completely staffed.

There have been few studies of the costs of emergency department services.6,9,10 Policy makers are forced to rely on anecdotal information or make financial projections based on charges or average costs that include both urgent and nonurgent visits to emergency departments. The purpose of the study reported here was to determine the average and marginal costs of visits to emergency departments according to the urgency of the visit.

Methods

Study Sample

The analysis of emergency department charges and costs is based on data from a convenience sample of six community hospitals in Michigan. The hospitals vary in terms of location, size, and volume of visits to the emergency department. None of the hospitals are located in the Detroit metropolitan area. Emergency services are provided on a fee-for-service basis by four independent and unaffiliated physician groups that use a common billing company. None of the hospitals make separate payments to the physician groups for emergency services. The physician groups and hospitals did not participate in the design of the study or the analysis of the data.

Study Design

There were two phases of the study. The objective of the first phase was to determine the ratio of the marginal cost to the average cost for services provided by the physician groups and emergency departments. These ratios were used in the second phase of the study to determine the marginal costs for individual patient visits. The hospitals and physician groups provided monthly data on the volume of visits, charges, and detailed direct and indirect costs for the 36-month period from January 1991 through December 1993. Marginal costs were determined by ordinary least-squares regression analysis. The dependent variables were the total monthly direct cost for physicians' services and the total monthly direct cost for hospital services. The independent variables included the monthly volume of visits and the indicator variables for the hospitals. The direct costs of services provided by the hospitals and physician groups were selected for analysis because of inconsistencies in the accounting techniques used by the hospitals and physician groups in reporting indirect costs. Marginal direct costs were divided by average direct costs to determine ratios of marginal to average costs. Monthly volume, charge, and cost data were also used to determine average charges and cost-to-charge ratios.

In the second phase of the study, the costs for individual visits were determined according to the urgency of the visit. The hospitals and physician groups provided data for a total of 32,854 visits during three randomly selected weeks in each quarter of 1993. Data included demographic information, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic codes, hospital charges by category (emergency department facility, laboratory, radiology, pharmacy, supplies, and other), and physicians' charges.11,12 The data provided by the hospitals and physician groups were merged on the basis of the unique patient registration number, date of service, and last name of the patient. After the merging, data were available for 24,010 emergency department visits.

The level of urgency was determined by senior coding personnel using explicit criteria.13 Urgent visits were defined as those that required immediate services in the emergency department. Patients whose visits were urgent included those who were admitted to the hospital; had conditions assigned urgent or critical care CPT codes; were transferred to another institution for special treatment, such as care of burns; or had lacerations requiring sutures, fractures, or medical conditions requiring extended evaluation in the emergency department. Visits classified as nonurgent were those for minor medical problems, such as acute pharyngitis, otitis media, upper respiratory tract infection, or first-degree burns. Visits by patients with moderately serious injuries or medical conditions were classified as semiurgent.

The cost-to-charge ratios for the hospitals were calculated from 1993 hospital Medicare Cost Reports. These ratios were multiplied by charges to estimate direct and indirect costs for supplies, pharmacy, laboratory, radiology, and miscellaneous items at the level of the individual visit.

Relative-value units for physicians' services, according to the resource-based relative-value scale, were used to estimate the cost of physicians' services for each visit.14 Approximately 95 percent of all the visits involved one of the CPT codes for emergency medical services (99281, 99282, 99283, 99284, 99285), with a total of about 100 CPT codes assigned. Total costs for physicians' services at each hospital were determined by multiplying the total charges for such services by the cost-to-charge ratios determined in the first phase of the study. Relative-value units for corresponding CPT codes were summed for all visits to each hospital. Hospital-specific conversion factors for relative-value units were determined by dividing the total costs for physicians' services by the sum of the relative-value units at each hospital. The cost of physicians' services for each visit was determined by multiplying the number of relative-value units for the visit by the hospital-specific conversion factor for the relative-value unit.

A major category of emergency department costs that may not be accurately represented by average cost-to-charge ratios is the allocation of nursing and support resources. Time and effort on the part of nursing and support staff are reflected in the emergency department's facility charge but may vary considerably according to the urgency of the visit. At some hospitals, the facility charge is the same for all visits, regardless of the severity of the medical condition. This analysis is based on the assumption that the allocation of nursing and support resources parallels that of physician resources, with a similar method of calculating relative-value units used to estimate personnel costs.10

Total facility costs for the emergency department at each hospital were determined by multiplying total facility charges by the cost-to-charge ratio, which was obtained from Medicare Cost Reports. A conversion factor was determined for each hospital by dividing the total facility costs for that hospital by the sum of patient-specific relative-value units. The personnel cost for each visit was determined by multiplying the number of relative-value units for the visit by the hospital-specific conversion factor for the relative-value unit.

The total cost for each visit, including direct and indirect costs, can be expressed as follows:

Total cost per visit = Fac + Sup + Phar + Anc + Phy

where Fac denotes total (direct plus indirect) facility costs (calculated in terms of relative-value units); Sup denotes total (direct plus indirect) supply costs (calculated in terms of the cost-to-charge ratio); Phar denotes total (direct plus indirect) pharmacy costs (calculated in terms of the cost-to-charge ratio); Anc denotes total (direct plus indirect) laboratory, radiology, and other ancillary costs (calculated in terms of the cost-to-charge ratio); and Phy denotes total (direct plus indirect) physicians' costs (calculated in terms of relative-value units). The total cost for each visit, excluding indirect costs, is the above cost minus the indirect costs associated with the facility, physicians' services, supplies, pharmacy, and ancillary services.

The marginal cost for each visit was estimated on the basis of the ratio of marginal to average costs for physicians' services (0.35) and facility services (0.41), as determined in phase 1 of the study. A ratio of 0.50 was assumed for all other costs (supplies, pharmacy, laboratory, radiology, and other ancillary services).15 The marginal cost for each visit was determined according to the following equation:

Marginal cost = Fac × 0.41 + (Sup + Phar + Anc) × 0.50 + Phy × 0.35.

The analysis was performed with SAS statistical software.16 An analysis of variance was estimated with the standard techniques. Confidence intervals were determined at the 95 percent level, and P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate significance. A more detailed description of the study methods is available elsewhere (NAPS).

Results

Selected characteristics of visits to the six emergency departments are shown in Table 1Table 1Characteristics of Visits to the Six Emergency Departments Studied.. The use of emergency departments according to the urgency of the medical problem is shown in Table 2Table 2Characteristics of Emergency Department Visits According to the Urgency of the Medical Problem.. A total of 32 percent of the visits were classified as nonurgent, 26 percent as semiurgent, and 42 percent as urgent.

Emergency department charges, average costs, and marginal costs are shown in Table 3Table 3Charges, Direct and Total Costs, and Marginal Costs, According to the Urgency of the Medical Problem.. The average total charge, including hospital and physicians' charges, for the 24,010 visits was $383.29, the average direct cost was $166.28, the average total cost (direct plus indirect) was $209.42, and the marginal cost was $87.68 (42 percent of the average cost). The average total charge for nonurgent visits was $124.02, the average total cost was $62.06, and the marginal cost was $24.40. For semiurgent visits, the average total charge was $312.49, the average total cost was $159.47, and the marginal cost was $66.94. For urgent visits, the average total charge was $621.32, the average total cost was $350.61, and the marginal cost was $147.88. The frequency distribution for the most common ICD-9 diagnoses among nonurgent visits is shown in Table 4Table 4Frequencies of Principal Diagnoses among 7657 Nonurgent Visits to Emergency Departments..

Discussion

This study shows that the average cost of a nonurgent visit to an emergency department is much lower than commonly believed, and the marginal cost of a nonurgent visit is about $25. For all 24,010 visits, the average cost was 55 percent of the average charge. One reason that the charges are twice the costs is that about half of all emergency department charges go uncollected.6 17 To put it another way, for each nonurgent visit to the emergency department by a patient who actually pays the charge of about $125, there is one visit by a patient who pays nothing for the services rendered. An obvious implication is that per-visit charges could be substantially reduced if a larger percentage of visits to emergency departments were covered by third-party payers, such as managed-care plans or state Medicaid programs. It is important to note, however, that without an alternative financing mechanism or some type of universal insurance coverage, reimbursement for emergency department services on the basis of cost could severely compromise the financial viability of many emergency departments that currently provide essential services to uninsured patients.

Marginal costs of nonurgent visits to emergency departments are the basis of the potential cost savings from the diversion of such visits to other settings, such as private physicians' offices. Although estimates of the marginal costs of office visits are lacking in the literature, average charges are well established. The median 1993 charge to a new patient for an office visit was $53, of which about $45 was collected.18,19 In the case of patients with nonurgent conditions who visit emergency departments during the day, when physicians' offices are open, referrals to private physicians may result in cost savings, because the marginal cost of office visits may be less than $25. At night and on weekends and holidays, however, such referrals would result in savings only if the marginal cost of providing services during these times at physicians' offices were less than the marginal cost of providing the services in emergency departments. Moreover, one cannot assume that all patients have access to sources of care other than the local hospital. Many inner-city and poor patients rely on the emergency department for health care services.20,21 According to a recent study, access to timely, episodic ambulatory care outside the emergency department is extremely limited, especially for Medicaid beneficiaries in urban areas.22

Previous analyses of emergency department costs have not accounted for the severity of illness. Grannemann et al. used a multiple-output cost function and ordinary least-squares regression to estimate inpatient and outpatient hospital services, including the marginal costs of emergency department services.9 The dependent variable was the total annual cost as reported in Medicare Cost Reports. The marginal cost for all emergency department services was estimated at $123 (61 percent of the average cost) and ranged from $71 (41 percent of the average cost) in high-volume emergency departments to $225 (89 percent of the average cost) in low-volume departments. Whereas Grannemann and associates used data from the 1982 National Ambulatory Care Survey and included a number of independent variables related to inpatient services and case mix, the current study was based specifically on detailed monthly data on emergency department costs and volume for a three-year period.

There are limitations of the study. The six community hospitals in Michigan were not randomly selected, although certain characteristics of visits to the emergency departments of these hospitals, including the mean age of the patients, age distribution, sex distribution, use of ancillary services, admission rate, and distribution of CPT codes, are similar to those reported in other studies of multiple hospitals.3,17,23-26 The results, however, may not be applicable to other hospital settings or locations. In addition, the six emergency departments participating in the study contracted with physicians who used a common billing company. It is possible, but unlikely, that hospitals using such arrangements are atypical of community hospitals.

In addition, there is considerable disagreement about the definition of urgency, and other investigators may challenge the validity of the criteria used to classify visits as nonurgent, semiurgent, or urgent. The explicit criteria used in this study were based on the patient's condition and actual use of emergency department services.

The use of charges as a proxy for costs may not provide an accurate picture of the true costs of services, but the cost-to-charge method used in the study is similar to methods used by other investigators to determine costs.10,27-33 The assumption of a 0.50 ratio of marginal to average costs for ancillary services (supplies, pharmacy, laboratory, radiology, and other services) may distort the estimates of marginal costs at the level of the individual visit. Ratios of marginal to average costs are rarely reported in the literature, and an assumed value of 0.50 is conservative, as compared with the calculated ratios for physicians' costs (0.35) and facility costs (0.41).15 The use of the relative-value unit in estimating physicians' and facility costs is based on empirical estimates of the use of physician resources but has not previously been used to determine emergency department costs.14 Under the prospective payment system based on diagnosis-related groups, hospital payments include emergency department costs for patients who are admitted, but the hospitals participating in the study could not provide complete data on outpatient charges for patients who were admitted from the emergency department. Hence, my estimate of costs for urgent visits is probably low. However, these deficiencies in the data should not affect the estimates of average and marginal costs for nonurgent and semiurgent patient visits.

Many important questions remain regarding the true costs of emergency department care for urgent and nonurgent conditions. Additional research is needed to determine the optimal use of emergency departments. However, this study provides evidence that the true marginal costs of nonurgent care at hospital emergency departments are far less than generally assumed.

NAPS See NAPS document no. 05283 for 28 pages of supplementary material. To order, contact NAPS c/o Microfiche Publications, 248 Hempstead Tpk., West Hempstead, NY 11552.

I am indebted to John R.C. Wheeler, Ph.D., Dean Smith, Ph.D., and Joseph Waeckerle, M.D., for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Source Information

From the Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Williams at M3224 School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029.

References

References

  1. 1

    Clinton WJ. Televised address to the joint session of Congress and the nation. September 23, 1993.

  2. 2

    Nonurgent use of hospital emergency departments by Medicaid and Medicare beneficiaries: a program inspection for the Office of Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services 1983. Washington, D.C.: Office of Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services, 1983.

  3. 3

    National Center for Health Statistics, McCaig LF. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 1992 emergency department summary. Advance data from vital and health statistics. No. 245. Hyattsville, Md.: Public Health Service, 1994. (DHHS publication no. (PHS) 94-1250.)

  4. 4

    Baker LC, Baker LS. Excess cost of emergency department visits for nonurgent care. Health Aff (Millwood) 1994;13:162-171
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  5. 5

    General Accounting Office. Report to the chairman, Subcommittee on Health for Families and the Uninsured, Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate: emergency departments unevenly affected by growth and change in patient use. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1993. (Publication no. GAO/HRD-93-4.)

  6. 6

    Saywell RM Jr, Nyhuis AW, Cordell WH, Crockett CR, Woods JR, Rodman GH Jr. An analysis of reimbursement for outpatient medical care in an urban hospital emergency department. Am J Emerg Med 1992;10:8-13
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Altman SH, Socholitzky E. The cost of ambulatory care in alternative settings: a review of major research findings. Annu Rev Public Health 1981;2:117-143
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Nicholson W. Intermediate microeconomics and its application. 4th ed. Chicago: Dryden Press, 1987:191.

  9. 9

    Grannemann TW, Brown RS, Pauly MV. Estimating hospital costs: a multiple-output analysis. J Health Econ 1986;5:107-127
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Baraff LJ, Cameron JM, Sekhon R. Direct costs of emergency medical care: a diagnosis-based case-mix classification system. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:1-7
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Physicians' current procedural terminology, CPT '94. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1994.

  12. 12

    Department of Health and Human Services. The international classification of diseases, 9th rev., clinical modification: ICD-9-CM. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1980. (DHHS publication no. (PHS) 80-1260.)

  13. 13

    Williams RM. The costs of emergency department services. (Doctoral dissertation. No. 9512232. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, University Microfilms International Dissertation Services, 1995.)

  14. 14

    Hsiao WC, Yntema DB, Braun P, Dunn D, Spencer C. Measurement and analysis of intraservice work. JAMA 1988;260:2361-2370
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Lave J, Lave L. Hospital cost functions. Am Econ Rev 1970;60:379-379
    Web of Science

  16. 16

    SAS user's guide, version 6.09. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute, 1990.

  17. 17

    Mitchell TA, Remmel RJ. Level of uncompensated care delivered by emergency physicians in Florida. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:1208-1214
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Physician fees: a comparison guide for fee schedule review and management. Los Angeles: Practice Management Information Corporation, 1994.

  19. 19

    Margolis J. Charge adjustments reflect buyers, payer demands. Med Group Pract Update 1994;33:1-2

  20. 20

    Stratmann WC, Ullman R. A study of consumer attitudes about health care: the role of the emergency room. Med Care 1975;13:1033-1043
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Kronenfeld J. Provider variables and the utilization of ambulatory care services. J Health Soc Behav 1978;19:68-76
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    The Medicaid Access Study Group. Access of Medicaid recipients to outpatient care. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1426-1430
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Guterman JJ, Franaszek JB, Murdy D, Gifford M. The 1980 patient urgency study: further analysis of the data. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:1191-1198
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Buesching DP, Jablonowski A, Vesta E, Dilts W, Runge C, Lund J. Inappropriate emergency department visits. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:672-676
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Haddy RI, Schmaler ME, Epting RJ. Nonemergency emergency room use in patients with and without primary care physicians. J Fam Pract 1987;24:389-392
    Web of Science | Medline

  26. 26

    Huntley HC. Emergency department visits -- a statewide survey. J Am Coll Emerg Phys 1977;6:296-299
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Klem SA, Pollack MM, Getson PR. Cost, resource utilization, and severity of illness in intensive care. J Pediatr 1990;116:231-237
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Munoz E, Seltzer V, Dietzek A, Pace B, Goldstein J, Wise L. The identifier concept: clinical parameters to stratify hospital patient costs within gynecology diagnosis-related groups. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1176-1182
    Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Saywell RM Jr, Woods JR, Rappaport SA, Allen TL. The value of age and severity as predictors of costs in geriatric head trauma patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37:625-630
    Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    Munoz E, Laughlin A, Regan DM, Teicher I, Margolis IB, Wise L. The financial effects of emergency department-generated admissions under prospective payment systems. JAMA 1985;254:1763-1771
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Melnick GA, Serrato CA, Mann JM. Prospective payments to hospitals: should emergency admissions have higher rates? Health Care Financ Rev 1989;10:29-39
    Medline

  32. 32

    Miller ME, Sulvetta MB. Medicare hospital outpatient services and costs: implications for prospective payment. Health Care Financ Rev 1992;14:135-149
    Medline

  33. 33

    Finkler SA. The distinction between cost and charges. Ann Intern Med 1982;96:102-109
    Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (92)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Michael Anderson, Carlos Dobkin, Tal Gross. (2012) The Effect of Health Insurance Coverage on the Use of Medical Services. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3:4, 1-27
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Shanna Cox, Teresa Dean, Samuel F. Posner, Denise J. Jamieson, Kathryn M. Curtis, Christopher H. Johnson, Susan Meikle. (2011) Reproductive Health-Related Visits to the Emergency Department, Maryland, 1999–2005. Journal of Women's Health111110081556006
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Robert A. Lowe, Michael Schull. (2011) On Easy Solutions. Annals of Emergency Medicine 58:3, 235-238
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Sabina A. Braithwaite, Jesse M. Pines, Brent R. Asplin, Stephen K. Epstein. (2011) Enhancing Systems to Improve the Management of Acute, Unscheduled Care. Academic Emergency Medicine 18:6, e39-e44
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Olanrewaju A. Soremekun, Paul D. Biddinger, Benjamin A. White, Julia R. Sinclair, Yuchiao Chang, Sarah B. Carignan, David F.M. Brown. (2011) Operational and financial impact of physician screening in the ED. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Gary A. Zarkin, Alexander J. Cowell, Katherine A. Hicks, Michael J. Mills, Steven Belenko, Laura J. Dunlap, Kimberly A. Houser, Vince Keyes. (2011) Benefits and costs of substance abuse treatment programs for state prison inmates: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Economicsn/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    R. R. Roberts, E. K. Mensah, R. A. Weinstein. (2010) A guide to interpreting economic studies in infectious diseases. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 16:12, 1713-1720
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Ariella Herman, Portia Jackson. (2010) Empowering Low-Income Parents with Skills to Reduce Excess Pediatric Emergency Room and Clinic Visits through a Tailored Low Literacy Training Intervention. Journal of Health Communication 15:8, 895-910
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Renee Hsia, Junaid Razzak, Alexander C. Tsai, Jon Mark Hirshon. (2010) Placing Emergency Care on the Global Agenda. Annals of Emergency Medicine 56:2, 142-149
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Karen Pendergast, Anne Wolf, Beth Sherrill, Xiaolei Zhou, Louis J. Aronne, Ian Caterson, Nicholas Finer, Hans Hauner, James Hill, Luc Van Gaal, Florence Coste, Jean-Pierre Despres. (2010) Impact of Waist Circumference Difference on Health-Care Cost among Overweight and Obese Subjects: The PROCEED Cohort. Value in Health 13:4, 402-410
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Stephen R. Hayden, Nicholas J. Jouriles, Peter Rosen. (2010) Requiem for “Non-Urgent” Patients in the Emergency Department. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 38:3, 381-383
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Gregory Luke Larkin, Annette L. Beautrais. (2010) Emergency Departments Are Underutilized Sites for Suicide Prevention. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention 31:1, 1-6
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Michael H. Lee, Michael J. Mello, Steven Reinert. (2009) Emergency Department Charges for Evaluating Minimally Injured Alcohol-Impaired Drivers. Annals of Emergency Medicine 54:4, 593-599
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    Kyung Hye Kim, Kathleen Carey, James F. Burgess. (2009) Emergency department visits: the cost of trauma centers. Health Care Management Science 12:3, 243-251
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Jonathan Bergman, Lorna Kwan, Arlene Fink, Sarah E. Connor, Mark S. Litwin. (2009) Hospice and Emergency Room Use by Disadvantaged Men Dying of Prostate Cancer. The Journal of Urology 181:5, 2084-2089
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    James A. Gordon. (2009) Social Welfare in the Hospital Emergency Department: The Challenge of Integrated Community Health Care. Annals of Emergency Medicine 53:5, 603-604
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Harold K. Simon, Daniel A. Hirsh, Alexander J. Rogers, Robert Massey, Michael A. DeGuzman. (2009) Pediatric Emergency Department Overcrowding: Electronic Medical Record for Identification of Frequent, Lower Acuity Visitors. Can We Effectively Identify Patients for Enhanced Resource Utilization?. The Journal of Emergency Medicine 36:3, 311-316
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Daniel Simonet. (2009) Cost Reduction Strategies for Emergency Services: Insurance Role, Practice Changes and Patients Accountability. Health Care Analysis 17:1, 1-19
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Nan-Ping Yang, Yi-Hui Lee, Ching-Heng Lin, Yuan-Chang Chung, Wen-Jone Chen, Pesus Chou. (2009) Utilization of and Direct Expenditure for Emergency Medical Care in Taiwan: A Population-based Descriptive Study. Journal of Epidemiology 19:1, 41-48
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Porter Hoagland, Di Jin, Lara Y. Polansky, Barbara Kirkpatrick, Gary Kirkpatrick, Lora E. Fleming, Andrew Reich, Sharon M. Watkins, Steven G. Ullmann, Lorraine C. Backer. (2009) The Costs of Respiratory Illnesses Arising from Florida Gulf Coast Karenia brevis Blooms. Environmental Health Perspectives
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Benjamin W. Friedman, Daniel Serrano, Michael Reed, Merle Diamond, Richard B. Lipton. (2009) Use of the Emergency Department for Severe Headache. A Population-Based Study. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain 49:1, 21-30
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    David F. Gaieski, Samir Mehta, Judd E. Hollander, Frances Shofer, Joseph Bernstein. (2008) Low-severity Musculoskeletal Complaints Evaluated in the Emergency Department. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 466:8, 1987-1995
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    A. M. Wolf, N. Finer, A. A. Allshouse, K. B. Pendergast, B. H. Sherrill, I. Caterson, J. O. Hill, L. J. Aronne, H. Hauner, C. Radigue, C. Amand, J.-P. Despres. (2008) PROCEED: Prospective Obesity Cohort of Economic Evaluation and Determinants: baseline health and healthcare utilization of the US sample*. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    V. Anantharaman. (2008) Impact of health care system interventions on emergency department utilization and overcrowding in Singapore. International Journal of Emergency Medicine 1:1, 11-20
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Kathy W. Monroe, Marga Jones, Renee Desmond, Edward W. Hook. (2007) Health-Seeking Behaviors and Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among Adolescents Attending An Urban Pediatric Emergency Department. Comprehensive Therapy 33:3, 120-126
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Rachel Stanley, Jessica Zimmerman, Christopher Hashikawa, Sarah J. Clark. (2007) Appropriateness of Children's Nonurgent Visits to Selected Michigan Emergency Departments. Pediatric Emergency Care 23:8, 532-536
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Mark A. Hostetler, Sharon Mace, Kathleen Brown, Joseph Finkler, Dennis Hernandez, Steven E. Krug, Neil Schamban. (2007) Emergency Department Overcrowding and Children. Pediatric Emergency Care 23:7, 507-515
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Douglas J. Jorgensen. (2007) Fiscal Analysis of Emergency Admissions for Chronic Back Pain: A Pilot Study from a Maine Hospital. Pain Medicine 8:4, 354-358
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Thomas Falvo, Lance Grove, Ruth Stachura, David Vega, Rose Stike, Melissa Schlenker, William Zirkin. (2007) The Opportunity Loss of Boarding Admitted Patients in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine 14:4, 332-337
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Michael J. Schull, Alex Kiss, John-Paul Szalai. (2007) The Effect of Low-Complexity Patients on Emergency Department Waiting Times. Annals of Emergency Medicine 49:3, 257-264.e1
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Thomas Falvo, Lance Grove, Ruth Stachura, William Zirkin. (2007) The Financial Impact of Ambulance Diversions and Patient Elopements. Academic Emergency Medicine 14:1, 58-62
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Rakesh D. Mistry, Christine S. Cho, Warren B. Bilker, David C. Brousseau, Evaline A. Alessandrini. (2006) Categorizing Urgency of Infant Emergency Department Visits: Agreement between Criteria. Academic Emergency Medicine 13:12, 1304-1311
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Anil Bamezai, Glenn Melnick. (2006) Marginal Cost of Emergency Department Outpatient Visits. Medical Care 44:9, 835-841
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    David C. Brousseau, Rakesh D. Mistry, Evaline A. Alessandrini. (2006) Methods of Categorizing Emergency Department Visit Urgency. Pediatric Emergency Care 22:9, 635-639
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Bertrand Janne d'Othée, David R. Langdon, Gregory K. Bell, Michael A. Bettmann. (2006) Operating Expenses for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Vascular Disease in an Academic Interventional Radiology Department: Cost Calculations According to a Microeconomic Method. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 17:1, 85-94
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Gary A. Zarkin, Laura J. Dunlap, Katherine A. Hicks, Daniel Mamo. (2005) Benefits and costs of methadone treatment: results from a lifetime simulation model. Health Economics 14:11, 1133-1150
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Robert J. Tait, Gary K. Hulse. (2005) Reduction in Emergency Presentations by Adolescent Poly-Drug Users: A Case-Series. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse 14:4, 41-53
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Julia E. Aledort, Edward W. Hook, Milton C. Weinstein, Sue J. Goldie. (2005) The Cost Effectiveness of Gonorrhea Screening in Urban Emergency Departments. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 32:7, 425-436
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    M. Sikand, K. Williams, C. White, C.G. Moran. (2005) The financial cost of treating polytrauma: Implications for tertiary referral centres in the United Kingdom. Injury 36:6, 733-737
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Mark Hauswald. (2005) Triage: Better Tools but the Wrong Problem. Academic Emergency Medicine 12:6, 533-535
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Katia Noyes, Andrew W Dick, Robert G Holloway. (2005) Pramipexole and Levodopa in Early Parkinson??s Disease. PharmacoEconomics 23:12, 1257-1270
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Bruno Bucheli, Benedict Martina. (2004) Reduced length of stay in medical emergency department patients: a prospective controlled study on emergency physician staffing. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 11:1, 29-34
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Annette L. Williams, Andra L. Blomkalns, W. Brian Gibler. (2004) Residency training in emergency medicine: the challenges of the 21st century. The Keio Journal of Medicine 53:4, 203-209
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Barry V. Fortner, Theodore A. Okon, Jeri Ashley, Ginney Kepler, Jana Chavez, Kurt Tauer, Michele Clements-Thompson, Lee Schwartzberg, Gail Demarco, Arthur C. Houts. (2003) The Zero Acceptance of Pain (ZAP)™ Quality Improvement Project. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 25:4, 334-343
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Barry V Fortner, Gail Demarco, Gordon Irving, Jeri Ashley, Ginny Keppler, Jana Chavez, Jana Munk. (2003) Description and Predictors of Direct and Indirect Costs of Pain Reported by Cancer Patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 25:1, 9-18
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    WENDY J. POMERANTZ, CHARLES J. SCHUBERT, HARRY D. ATHERTON, UMA R. KOTAGAL. (2002) Characteristics of nonurgent emergency department use in the first 3 months of life. Pediatric Emergency Care 18:6, 403-408
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Harold A. Pollack, Kaveh Khoshnood, Kim M. Blankenship, Frederick L. Altice. (2002) The Impact of Needle Exchange-based Health Services on Emergency Department Use. Journal of General Internal Medicine 17:5, 341-348
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    SUPRIYA D. MEHTA, DAVID BISHAI, M. RENE HOWELL, RICHARD E. ROTHMAN, THOMAS C. QUINN, JONATHAN M. ZENILMAN. (2002) Cost-Effectiveness of Five Strategies for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Control Among Female and Male Emergency Department Patients. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 29:2, 83-91
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Todd B. Taylor. (2001) Threats to the Health Care Safety Net. Academic Emergency Medicine 8:11, 1080-1087
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Lynne D. Richardson, Ula Hwang. (2001) Access to Care A Review of the Emergency Medicine Literature. Academic Emergency Medicine 8:11, 1030-1036
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    W. Wesley Fields, Brent R. Asplin, Gregory L. Larkin, Catherine A. Marco, Loren A. Johnson, Charlotte Yeh, Keith T. Ghezzi, Michael Rapp. (2001) The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act as a Federal Health Care Safety Net Program. Academic Emergency Medicine 8:11, 1064-1069
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Ngozi Imasogie, Frances Chung. (2001) Effect of return hospital visits on economics of ambulatory surgery. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 14:5, 573-578
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Robert A. Lowe, Sheetal Chhaya, Kathleen Nasci, Laurence J. Gavin, Kathy Shaw, Mark L. Zwanger, Joseph A. Zeccardi, William C. Dalsey, Stephanie B. Abbuhl, Harold Feldman, Jesse A. Berlin. (2001) Effect of Ethnicity on Denial of Authorization for Emergency Department Care by Managed Care Gatekeepers. Academic Emergency Medicine 8:3, 259-266
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    James A. Gordon. (2001) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Social Work Services in the Emergency Department: A Conceptual Model. Academic Emergency Medicine 8:1, 54-60
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Karin V. Rhodes, James A. Gordon, Robert A. Lowe, . (2000) Preventive Care in the Emergency Department, Part I: Clinical Preventive Services-Are They Relevant to Emergency Medicine?*. Academic Emergency Medicine 7:9, 1036-1041
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Paul A Taheri, David A Butz, Lazar J Greenfield. (2000) Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission11No competing interests declared.. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 191:2, 123-130
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Joshua H. Mandelberg, Robert E. Kuhn, Michael A. Kohn. (2000) Epidemiologic Analysis of an Urban, Public Emergency Department's Frequent Users. Academic Emergency Medicine 7:6, 637-646
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Paul A. Taheri, David A. Butz, Lazar J. Greenfield. (2000) Academic Health Systems Management: The Rationale Behind Capitated Contracts. Annals of Surgery 231:6, 849-859
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Arie Roth, Shlomo Laniado, Naomi Malov, Ziv Carthy, Michal Golovner, Rachel Naveh, Iki Alroy, Elieser Kaplinsky. (2000) Potential reduction of costs and hospital emergency department visits resulting from prehospital transtelephonic triage-the shahal experience in israel. Clinical Cardiology 23:4, 271-276
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Kimberly M. Viner, Michael Bellino, Thomas D. Kirsch, Paul Kivela, Julio C. Silva. (2000) Managed care organization authorization denials: Lack of patient knowledge and timely alternative ambulatory care. Annals of Emergency Medicine 35:3, 272-276
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Robert Boyle, Craig Smith, John McIntyre. (2000) The changing utilization of a children’s emergency department. Ambulatory Child Health 6:1, 39-43
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Richard C. Wuerz, Leslie W. Milne, David R. Eitel, Debbie Travers, Nicki Gilboy. (2000) Reliability and Validity of a New Five-level Triage Instrument. Academic Emergency Medicine 7:3, 236-242
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    R. A. Rosenblatt, G. E. Wright, L. M. Baldwin, L. Chan, P. Clitherow, F. M. Chen, L. G. Hart. (2000) The effect of the doctor-patient relationship on emergency department use among the elderly. American Journal of Public Health 90:1, 97-102
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Louis C. Hampers, Susie Cha, David J. Gutglass, Helen J. Binns, Steven E. Krug. (1999) Fast Track and the Pediatric Emergency Department: Resource Utilization and Patient Outcomes. Academic Emergency Medicine 6:11, 1153-1159
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Tiepu Liu, Michael R. Sayre, Steven C. Carleton. (1999) Emergency Medical Care: Types, Trends, and Factors Related to Nonurgent Visits. Academic Emergency Medicine 6:11, 1147-1152
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Michael J. VanRooyen, Jurek G. Grabowski, Anthony J. Ghidorzi, Chayan Dey, Gary R. Strange. (1999) The Perceived Effectiveness of Total Quality Management as a Tool for Quality Improvement in Emergency Medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine 6:8, 811-816
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    David Slobodkin, Jennifer L. Kitlas, Paul G. Zielske. (1999) A Test of the Feasibility of Pneumococcal Vaccination in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine 6:7, 724-727
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Harrison J. Alter, Russ Braun, James L. Zazzali. (1999) Health Status Disparities among Public and Private Emergency Department Patients. Academic Emergency Medicine 6:7, 736-743
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Arie Roth, Naomi Malov, Yoram Bloch, Michal Golovner, Yuri Slesarenko, Rachel Naveh, Elieser Kaplinsky, Shlomo Laniado. (1999) Assessment of a creatine kinase-MB/myoglobin kit in the prehospital setting in patients presenting with acute nontraumatic chest pain. Critical Care Medicine 27:6, 1085-1089
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Kevin T. Stroupe, Denise Gaskins, Michael D. Murray. (1999) Health-Care Costs of Inner-City Patients with Asthma. Journal of Asthma 36:8, 645-655
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Brian S. Zachariah. (1999) The Problem of Ambulance Misuse: Whose Problem Is It, Anyway?. Academic Emergency Medicine 6:1, 2-5
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Francis L. Counselman, Robert W. Schafermeyer, Debra G. Perina. (1998) Academic Departments of Emergency Medicine: The Effects of Managed Care. Academic Emergency Medicine 5:11, 1095-1100
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Linda F. McCaig,, Catharine W. Burt,, Barbara J. Stussman,. (1998) A Comparison of Work-Related Injury Visits and Other Injury Visits to Emergency Departments in the United States, 1995-1996. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine 40:10, 870-875
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    David G Whiteis. (1998) Third World medicine in First World cities: capital accumulation, uneven development and public health. Social Science & Medicine 47:6, 795-808
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Kimberly J. Rask, Mark V. Williams, Sally E. McNagny, Ruth M. Parker, David W. Baker. (1998) Ambulatory Health Care Use by Patients in a Public Hospital Emergency Department. Journal of General Internal Medicine 13:9, 614-620
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Michael Bryant, Gim Tan. (1998) Seeing primary care patients in emergency departments. Emergency Medicine 10:2, 111-116
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Christopher Baggoley. (1998) Primary care patients - what's the problem?. Emergency Medicine 10:2, 95-100
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Claudia M. Beck, Ronald I. Paul. (1998) Payment of Emergency Department Bills by Medicaid Patients. Academic Emergency Medicine 5:4, 330-333
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Sandra M. Schneider, Glenn C. Hamilton, Peter Moyer, J. Stephen Stapczynski. (1998) Definition of Emergency Medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine 5:4, 348-351
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Kathryn A. Phillips, Rick K. Homan, Patricia H. Hiatt, Harold S. Luft, Thomas E. Kearney, Stuart E. Heard, Kent R. Olson. (1998) The Costs and Outcomes of Restricting Public Access to Poison Control Centers. Medical Care 36:3, 271-280
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    Charles B. Cairns, Herbert G. Garrison, Jerris R. Hedges, David L. Schriger, Terence D. Valenzuela. (1998) Development of New Methods to Assess the Outcomes of Emergency Care. Academic Emergency Medicine 5:2, 157-161
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Leona E. Markson, Robert Houchens, Thomas R. Fanning, Barbara J. Turner. (1998) Repeated Emergency Department Use by HIV-Infected Persons: Effect of Clinic Accessibility and Expertise in HIV Care. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology 17:1, 35-41
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    Gary P. Young, Robert A. Lowe. (1997) Adverse Outcomes of Managed Care Gatekeeping. Academic Emergency Medicine 4:12, 1129-1136
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Alan J. Hirshberg, C. James Holliman, Richard C. Wuerz, Dane M. Chapman. (1997) Case Management by Physician Assistants and Primary Care Physicians vs Emergency Physicians. Academic Emergency Medicine 4:11, 1046-1051
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    Robert W Derlet, Gary P Young. (1997) Managed Care and Emergency Medicine: Conflicts, Federal Law, and California Legislation. Annals of Emergency Medicine 30:3, 292-300
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Selby, Joe V., . (1997) Cost Sharing in the Emergency Department — Is It Safe? is It Needed?. New England Journal of Medicine 336:24, 1750-1751
    Full Text

  87. 87

    Linda L Spillane, Eileen W. Lumb, Daniel J. Cobaugh, Susan Riley Wilcox, John S. Clark, Sandra M. Schneider. (1997) Frequent Users of the Emergency Department: Can We Intervene?. Academic Emergency Medicine 4:6, 574-580
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Rebecca Twersky, David Fishman, Peter Homel. (1997) What Happens After Discharge? Return Hospital Visits After Ambulatory Surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 84:2, 319-324
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    Gary P. Young, Robert A. Lowe. (1997) Adverse Outcomes of Managed Care Gatekeeping. Academic Emergency Medicine 4:12, 1129
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    (1996) Referral Out from the ED-Appropriate. Academic Emergency Medicine 3:11, 1071-1073
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    (1996) Costs of Visits to Emergency Departments. New England Journal of Medicine 335:3, 209-211
    Full Text

  92. 92

    Steinbrook, Robert, . (1996) The Role of the Emergency Department. New England Journal of Medicine 334:10, 657-658
    Full Text

Letters