Special Article
Attitudes of Michigan Physicians and the Public toward Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia
N Engl J Med 1996; 334:303-309February 1, 1996
- Abstract
Background
There has been a continuing public debate about assisted suicide and the proper role, if any, of physicians in this practice. Legislative bans and various forms of legalization have been proposed.
Methods
We mailed questionnaires to three stratified random samples of Michigan physicians in specialties likely to involve the care of terminally ill patients: 500 in the spring of 1994, 500 in the summer of 1994, and 600 in the spring of 1995. Similar questionnaires were mailed to stratified random samples of Michigan adults: 449 in the spring of 1994 and 899 in the summer of 1994. Several different questionnaire forms were used, all of which included questions about whether physician-assisted suicide should be banned in Michigan or legalized under certain conditions.
Results
Usable questionnaires were returned by 1119 of 1518 physicians eligible for the study (74 percent), and 998 of 1307 eligible adults in the sample of the general public (76 percent). Asked to choose between legalization of physician-assisted suicide and an explicit ban, 56 percent of physicians and 66 percent of the public supported legalization, 37 percent of physicians and 26 percent of the public preferred a ban, and 8 percent of each group were uncertain. When the physicians were given a wider range of choices, 40 percent preferred legalization, 37 percent preferred “no law” (i.e., no government regulation), 17 percent favored prohibition, and 5 percent were uncertain. If physician-assisted suicide were legal, 35 percent of physicians said they might participate if requested — 22 percent would participate in either assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia, and 13 percent would participate only in assisted suicide. Support for physician-assisted suicide was lowest among the strongly religious.
Conclusions
Most Michigan physicians prefer either the legalization of physician-assisted suicide or no law at all; fewer than one fifth prefer a complete ban on the practice. Given a choice between legalization and a ban, two thirds of the Michigan public prefer legalization and one quarter prefer a ban.
Media in This Article
Figure 1
How Physicians Modified Their Choices between Legalizing and Banning Assisted Suicide When “No Law” Options Were Included.Table 1
Plans A and B for the Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide.Article Activity
- Article
The legalization, in some form, of physician-assisted suicide has been the goal of referendums introduced in the states of Washington (defeated in 1991), California (defeated in 1992), and Oregon (passed in 1994, but not yet implemented because of court challenges). Assisted suicide has also been the focus of legislative and judicial action in Michigan during the past several years, prompted by the actions of Dr. Jack Kevorkian. Moreover, assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia (i.e., euthanasia requested by the patient) continue to be widely discussed in the medical and bioethics literature.1-10
A fundamental issue is whether society should ever permit any form of assisted suicide. There are well-developed arguments on both sides.6 Supporters of the practice emphasize the relief of suffering, individual autonomy, and the patient's right to be free from paternalistic state intrusion.11-14 Advocates also contend that allowing a small number of assisted suicides under carefully controlled and narrowly restricted conditions is better than acceding to secret and unregulated activity. Opponents stress that legalizing assisted suicide would represent a profound change in social values, that it would have serious unintended consequences, and that any gains from accepting the practice are not worth the risks.7,15-18
Even if assisted suicide were to be permitted under some conditions, a second issue is whether physicians should ever participate in it. Some believe that participation would run counter to the physician's role as a healer and compromise the trust patients place in their physicians,7 but others argue that it would not necessarily violate professional integrity.4 In any event, physicians are logical candidates for participation; they can assess a patient's medical and emotional status, and they know what pharmacologic agents and modes of administration would meet the needs of particular patients. More important, physicians are becoming better trained to provide palliative care, so they are ideally suited to demonstrate to patients that acceptable alternatives to assisted suicide may exist.5,6,8,9 It thus seems likely that if any form of assisted suicide is legalized, legislators will want to entrust the responsibility of assistance to physicians.
Prompted by the debate over physician-assisted suicide in Michigan, and in the hope of providing useful information to the Michigan legislature, we undertook a series of surveys of Michigan physicians and the state's general public, beginning in the spring of 1994. Preliminary results of the initial survey were reported in the Journal. 19 We conducted a second survey of physicians and the public in the summer of 1994 and a third survey, of physicians alone, in the spring of 1995. This article reports the major findings from all three surveys.
Methods
Respondents
We selected our target sample of Michigan physicians from the American Medical Association master list, which contains both members and nonmembers of that group. After excluding physicians in residency training and in fellowships, we further narrowed the sample to include only physicians who were not federal employees, were currently practicing in Michigan, were either full-time hospital staff members or in office-based practice, directly cared for patients, and practiced specialties that involve the care of patients with terminal or chronic illness. More than half the doctors who met the first four criteria also met the fifth. From the approximately 8000 physicians in the state who qualified, geographically stratified random subgroups were selected to constitute the subsamples for the three separate surveys: 500 physicians for the spring of 1994, 500 for the summer of 1994, and 600 for the spring of 1995.
The target sample of Michigan adults was selected from a commercially maintained sample frame (Survey Samplings, Fairfield, Conn.) derived from national telephone-directory listings and information from administrative records (such as those for driver's licenses). Geographically stratified, random subgroups were selected to constitute subsamples: 449 adults for the spring of 1994, and 899 for the summer of 1994.
Questionnaires
We used a variety of questionnaires to explore different questions and wordings, and to assess whether the responses to certain core questions (common to all the forms) were influenced by the order of the questions, the other questions asked, or information given on the questionnaire.20,21 Each form of the questionnaire provided background information on arguments raised in the debate about physician-assisted suicide. To guard against bias, the questionnaires were developed in consultation with medical and legal experts and with spokespersons on both sides of the assisted-suicide debate in Michigan.
All questionnaires described a plan that would legalize physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill adult patients suffering unacceptable pain. Extensive safeguards were included (Table 1Table 1
Plans A and B for the Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide.).All 1994 surveys presented what we called Plan A for physician-assisted suicide, adapted from work by a subcommittee of the Michigan Commission on Death and Dying and similar to the Washington and California state referendums. The 1995 survey of physicians involved three different forms. One form presented what we called Plan B, which was designed to reflect some, but not all, of the features of a proposal by Miller et al.5 that called for a system of specially certified “palliative-care consultants” monitored by “palliative-care committees.” Two other forms presented both Plan A and Plan B. For comparability, Plan B was kept consistent with Plan A in overall purpose, eligibility requirements, and legal safeguards. The plans differed in the implementation of procedural safeguards (Table 1).
All respondents, both physicians and the general public, were asked whether the Michigan legislature should ban physician-assisted suicide or enact Plan A (or Plan B, for some physicians), and whether the plan should include voluntary euthanasia (defined as allowing a physician to “take the final action” that brings on a patient's death). Physicians also were asked about their personal willingness to participate in physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia, their experience with terminally ill patients, and whether having “no law” (i.e., leaving the issue up to “the doctor–patient relationship” or “the medical profession”) would be a better choice for Michigan than either legalization or prohibition.
Questionnaires were mailed according to an established survey-mailing protocol to increase respondents' cooperation.22
Results
Among the 1600 Michigan physicians in the target sample, 82 were found to be ineligible because they were either no longer practicing in Michigan (62 potential respondents) or deceased (5), or because the mailed questionnaires had been returned to the sender at least twice (15). Of the remaining 1518 eligible physicians, 1119 (74 percent) returned usable questionnaires. Among the 1348 Michigan adults in the target sample, 41 were found to be ineligible because they had died or moved out of the state. Of the remaining 1307 eligible respondents, 998 (76 percent) returned usable questionnaires.
The three survey periods and multiple questionnaire formats were not associated with any statistically significant differences in our results. Accordingly, the findings from the subsamples were combined and data are reported only for the total samples.
Attitudes toward Legalization
Respondents were asked whether the Michigan legislature should ban all physician-assisted suicide or legalize it by enacting Plan A (in the 1994 surveys) or Plan B (in the 1995 survey). Table 2Table 2
Attitudes of Physicians and the Public toward Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia. shows that 56 percent of physicians and 66 percent of the public thought the legislature should probably or definitely enact the plan and that 37 percent of physicians and 26 percent of the public thought the legislature should probably or definitely ban all physician-assisted suicide; 8 percent in each group were uncertain.Respondents then were asked whether voluntary euthanasia should be legally available in specified situations. Table 2 shows that many supported the physician's taking the final action to cause death, at least under some circumstances (44 percent of physicians and 53 percent of the public); a smaller group supported assisted suicide but rejected voluntary euthanasia (15 percent of physicians and 16 percent of the public).
Participation by Physicians
Physicians were asked whether they themselves might be willing to participate in physician-assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia if the practices were legalized. Fifty-two percent said they would not; 13 percent said they might participate only in assisted suicide; 22 percent said they might participate in both practices; 10 percent were uncertain; and 2 percent preferred not to answer (Table 2). In the 1995 survey, physicians who said they would not participate were asked, “Even though you would not participate, would you be willing to refer the patient to such services?” Of the 186 physicians who would not participate in either practice, 43 percent said they would refer patients; 38 percent said they would not; and 19 percent were uncertain.
Respondents from the general public were asked whether they might request physician-assisted suicide for themselves, if it were legalized and they were facing a terminal illness with much pain and suffering. Forty-eight percent said they probably or definitely would request it; 30 percent said they probably or definitely would not; and 22 percent were uncertain (Table 2).
A Wider Range of Choices
An item included only in the physicians' questionnaires broadened the range of choices to include “no law” options (as detailed in Figure 1Figure 1
How Physicians Modified Their Choices between Legalizing and Banning Assisted Suicide When “No Law” Options Were Included.). Asked which option they “would favor most,” 40 percent of physicians favored a law permitting physician-assisted suicide; 17 percent favored a law prohibiting it; 37 percent favored having “no law” — leaving the issue to be decided either by “the doctor–patient relationship” (22 percent) or on the basis of “guidelines or regulations” from “the medical profession” (15 percent); and 5 percent were uncertain.Figure 1 compares the physicians' responses to the initial two-option choice (legalization or a ban) with their responses to the later question that also included the “no law” options. Nearly half the physicians who initially chose a ban over legalization in fact preferred one of the “no law” options. Far fewer — just over one quarter — of those who initially chose legalization preferred “no law” when given the option.
Plan A or Plan B
The 1995 survey of physicians included three separate forms, one presenting only Plan B, one presenting Plan A first and then Plan B, and one reversing that order. The latter two forms included the question: “Assuming physician-assisted suicide were to be legalized, which do you think would be the better plan for doing so, Plan A or Plan B?” If we combine the results for those two forms to balance any order effects, then 42 percent of the physicians preferred Plan B, 27 percent preferred Plan A, 26 percent selected the response “I am unwilling or unable to state a preference because I think all physician-assisted suicide should be banned,” and 4 percent were uncertain (264 physicians responded; 95 percent confidence intervals, ±6 percent or less).
For the questionnaires that presented both legalization plans, we tabulated the respondents' preferences for Plan A or a ban and Plan B or a ban. Among those who preferred Plan A to prohibition, 93 percent also preferred Plan B to a ban (95 percent confidence interval, 88 to 96 percent). However, among those who preferred Plan B to prohibition, only 79 percent also preferred Plan A to a ban (95 percent confidence interval, 71 to 85 percent).
Personal Characteristics Correlated with Views on Assisted Suicide
Table 3Table 3
Attitudes toward Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia According to Selected Characteristics of Respondents. presents personal characteristics of Michigan physicians in relation to their views on physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia, as well as similar data for the Michigan public. There were no clear differences among physicians according to sex, but in the general public men were slightly more likely than women to support legalization and to consider assisted suicide for themselves. There was a slight tendency, among both physicians and the public, for older respondents to be less likely to support legalization. The most important personal characteristic was religion — those who considered religion very important in their lives were much less likely both to support legalization and to consider personal involvement in assisted suicide, either as providers (physicians) or requesters (the public), than were people for whom religion was less important (Table 3).Table 3 also compares the attitudes toward legalization and participation among physicians in different specialties. We did not observe any strong or consistent differences according to specialty. Among the physicians as a group, doctors who frequently treated terminally ill patients were less likely to support legalization of the practices in question, but not less likely to be willing to participate in the practices if they became legal (Table 3).
Two thirds of Michigan adults reported that they or their close friends or family members had been faced with a terminal illness, although having had such an experience was not linked to any overall differences in support for legalization or in the likelihood of requesting physician-assisted suicide (Table 3).
Discussion
Public support in the United States for legalizing physician-assisted suicide, voluntary euthanasia, or both, seems to be increasing25,26; our findings with respect to Michigan are consistent with that trend. When asked to choose between two courses of legislative action, about two thirds of Michigan adults favored the legalization of physician-assisted suicide, and about one quarter preferred a ban on the practice. A majority of Michigan physicians also favored legalization rather than a ban, if given only those two choices. But what many Michigan physicians most preferred is that the legal system stay out of this area — a position consistent with that of the Michigan State Medical Society, which opposes any legislation regarding physician-assisted suicide, one way or the other. Attractive as the “no law” option may be to some physicians, policy analyses suggest that it would be unrealistic and unworkable in any form.6,27
Most of the Michigan physicians surveyed in 1995 were willing to choose between two plans for legalization. The more frequently chosen option was Plan B, which assigned many responsibilities to palliative-care consultants and committees instead of burdening the physician, as was done in Plan A. It is worth noting that very few physicians who preferred Plan A ruled out Plan B (that is, preferred an outright ban to Plan B), whereas the reverse was not true.
The willingness of physicians to trade some degree of independence in patient care for the assistance of palliative-care consultants may reflect several considerations: physicians' concern about limitations in their own palliative-care skills; the moral, ethical, and legal liabilities associated with participating in physician-assisted suicide; and a preference for consultation among peers, which may be more familiar and comfortable to physicians than a legally prescribed protocol.
About one third (35 percent) of physicians thought they might participate in assisted suicide if the practice were legalized; some others were uncertain. Among the 52 percent who would not participate themselves, many indicated that they would be willing to refer patients to practitioners who would. This parallels attitudes toward abortion in some respects; many physicians who oppose a medical action on moral grounds are nevertheless willing to make referrals out of respect for a patient's autonomy.
Physicians' personal experiences and values influence their positions on these issues. For example, the doctors who had the least contact with terminally ill patients were the most likely to support the legalization of assisted suicide, a finding consistent with the attitude of physicians in the state of Washington.2 The widely replicated finding that strongly religious people are the most likely group to oppose such legalization28 was as evident in our study among physicians as among all adults in Michigan. Of the doctors who were asked about the importance of religion in their lives, those who said it was “very important” were the least likely to support legalization. Nevertheless, half of them were still willing to choose between the two legalization plans, and they favored Plan B by a three-to-one margin. This suggests that among those with the greatest reservations about legalization, the additional safeguards in Plan B — palliative-care consultants and committees — made that plan more acceptable than Plan A.
Our study differs from most earlier studies in that we surveyed both physicians and the general public using very similar questions, in order to make meaningful comparisons. Also, we asked respondents to consider specifically what the state legislature should do if the only choices were legalizing physician-assisted suicide with substantial restrictions or banning it entirely. We surveyed these groups at three different times and varied the wording and format of our questionnaires substantially, yet our surveys had highly similar results. This high degree of replication29 leaves us confident that the findings reported here are robust.
Our results may have several policy implications. On the one hand, given the overall stability of our findings at a time when assisted suicide was widely debated in Michigan, it appears unlikely that any new plan for legalization could win over large numbers of heretofore reluctant physicians, voters, or legislators. On the other hand, it is already the case, among both Michigan physicians and the state's adult population in general, that those who support the carefully defined legalization of physician-assisted suicide clearly outnumber those who support a total ban. Moreover, many in the state would also support voluntary euthanasia, especially for patients unable to act for themselves. These complex issues should not be decided by opinion polls, of course, but neither should medical ethicists or political decision makers ignore the strongly held views of those who will be most affected by legislative decisions on the question — physicians and their potential patients.
Supported by a grant from the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation.
We are indebted to Fei Fei Metzler for assistance in conducting the surveys and analyzing the data.
Source Information
From the Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research (J.G.B., K.H.A., D.J.D., R.L.L., A.D.C.), the Department of Family Practice, the Medical School (D.J.D.), and the School of Public Health (R.L.L.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and the Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences and the Departments of Family Practice and Philosophy, Michigan State University, East Lansing (H.B.).
Address reprint requests to Dr. Bachman at the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248.
- References
References
1
Annas GJ . Death by prescription: the Oregon initiative. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1240-1243
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline2
Cohen J ,Fihn S ,Boyko E ,Jonsen A ,Wood R . Attitudes toward assisted suicide and euthanasia among physicians in Washington State. N Engl J Med 1994;331:89-94
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline3
McCarrick PM . Active euthanasia and assisted suicide. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1992;2:79-100
Medline4
Miller FG ,Brody H . Professional integrity and physician-assisted death. Hastings Cent Rep 1995;25:8-17
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline5
Miller FG ,Quill TE ,Brody H ,Fletcher JC ,Gostin LO ,Meier DE . Regulating physician-assisted death. N Engl J Med 1994;331:119-123
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline6
The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. When death is sought: assisted suicide and euthanasia in the medical context. Albany, N.Y.: Health Research, 1994.
7
Pellegrino ED . Doctors must not kill. J Clin Ethics 1992;3:95-102
Medline8
Quill TE. Death and dignity: making choices and taking charge. New York: W.W. Norton, 1993.
9
Quill TE . Doctor, I want to die: will you help me? JAMA 1993;270:870-873
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline10
Physician-assisted suicide: toward a comprehensive understanding: report of the Task Force on Physician-assisted Suicide of the Society for Health and Human Values
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline11
Brody H . Assisted death -- a compassionate response to a medical failure. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1384-1388
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline12
Quill TE ,Cassel CK ,Meier DE . Care of the hopelessly ill: proposed clinical criteria for physician-assisted suicide. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1380-1384
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline13
Teno J ,Lynn J . Voluntary active euthanasia: the individual case and public policy. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:827-830
Web of Science | Medline14
Weir RF . The morality of physician-assisted suicide. Law Med Health Care 1992;20:116-126
Medline15
AGS Public Policy Committee
Web of Science | Medline16
Kamisar Y . Are laws against assisted suicide unconstitutional? Hastings Cent Rep 1993;23:32-41
Web of Science | Medline17
Orentlicher D . Physician participation in assisted suicide. JAMA 1989;262:1844-1845
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline18
Singer PA ,Siegler M . Euthanasia -- a critique. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1881-1883
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline19
Bachman JG ,Doukas DJ ,Lichtenstein RL ,Alcser KH . Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Michigan. N Engl J Med 1994;331:812-813
Full Text | Web of Science | Medline20
Schuman H, Presser S. Questions and answers in attitude surveys: experiments on question form, wording, and context. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
21
Schwarz N, Sudman S, eds. Context effects in social and psychological research. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
22
Dillman DA. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. New York: John Wiley, 1978.
23
Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
24
Vogt WP. Dictionary of statistics and methodology: a nontechnical guide for the social sciences. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, 1993.
25
Blendon RJ ,Szalay US ,Knox RA . Should physicians aid their patients in dying? The public perspective. JAMA 1992;267:2658-2662
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline26
Wood FW, ed. An American profile — opinions and behavior, 1972-1989: opinion results on 300 high-interest issues derived from the General Social Survey conducted by the National Opinion Research Center. Detroit: Gale Research, 1990.
27
Final report of the Michigan Commission on Death and Dying. Legislative Service Bureau, State of Michigan. Lansing, Mich.: Michigan Commission on Death and Dying, 1994. (MCDD FOIA DOC. A-902.)
28
Finlay B . Right to life versus the right to die: some correlates of euthanasia attitudes. Sociol Soc Res 1985;69:548-56029
Campbell DT ,Fiske DW . Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959;56:81-105
CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline
- Citing Articles (72)
Citing Articles
1
Goedele Baeke, Jean-Pierre Wils, Bert Broeckaert. (2011) ‘We are (not) the master of our body’: elderly Jewish women's attitudes towards euthanasia and assisted suicide. Ethnicity & Health 16:3, 259-278
CrossRef2
Bert Broeckaert, Joris Gielen, Trudie van Iersel, Stef Van den Branden. (2010) Euthanasia and Palliative Care in Belgium: The Attitudes of Flemish Palliative Care Nurses and Physicians Toward Euthanasia. AJOB Primary Research 1:3, 31-44
CrossRef3
Tracy K. Witte, April R. Smith, Thomas E. Joiner. (2010) Reason for cautious optimism? two studies suggesting reduced stigma against suicide. Journal of Clinical Psychologyn/a-n/a
CrossRef4
Jane L. Givens, Susan L. Mitchell. (2009) Concerns About End-of-Life Care and Support for Euthanasia. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 38:2, 167-173
CrossRef5
Alice Ming-lin Chong, Shiu-yeu Fok. (2009) Attitudes Toward Euthanasia: Implications for Social Work Practice. Social Work in Health Care 48:2, 119-133
CrossRef6
C. Catania, V. Zagonel, V. Fosser, N. La Verde, O. Bertetto, C. Iacono, M. Venturini, D. Radice, L. Adamoli, F. Boccardo. (2008) Opinions concerning euthanasia, life-sustaining treatment and acceleration of death: results of an Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) survey. Annals of Oncology 19:11, 1947-1954
CrossRef7
G. Böttger-Kessler, K. H. Beine. (2007) Aktive Sterbehilfe bei Menschen im Wachkoma?. Der Nervenarzt 78:7, 802-808
CrossRef8
Charles L. Sprung, Sara Carmel, Peter Sjokvist, Mario Baras, Simon L. Cohen, Paulo Maia, Albertus Beishuizen, Daniel Nalos, Ivan Novak, Mia Svantesson, Julie Benbenishty, Beverly Henderson, . (2007) Attitudes of European physicians, nurses, patients, and families regarding end-of-life decisions: the ETHICATT study. Intensive Care Medicine 33:1, 104-110
CrossRef9
G. Caleb Alexander, Matthew K. Wynia. 2007. Survey Research in Bioethics. , 139-160.
CrossRef10
M.C. MARINI, H. NEUENSCHWANDER, F. STIEFEL. (2006) Attitudes toward euthanasia and physician assisted suicide: A survey among medical students, oncology clinicians, and palliative care specialists. Palliative & Supportive Care 4:03,
CrossRef11
Benjamin E. Moulton, Terrence D. Hill, Amy Burdette. (2006) Religion and Trends in Euthanasia Attitudes among U.S. Adults, 1977–2004. Sociological Forum 21:2, 249-272
CrossRef12
Joachim Cohen, Isabelle Marcoux, Johan Bilsen, Patrick Deboosere, Gerrit van der Wal, Luc Deliens. (2006) European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries. Social Science & Medicine 63:3, 743-756
CrossRef13
Theresa A. Harvath, Lois L. Miller, Kathryn A. Smith, Lisa D. Clark, Ann Jackson, Linda Ganzini. (2006) Dilemmas Encountered by Hospice Workers When Patients Wish to Hasten Death. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing 8:4, 200-209
CrossRef14
Matthew Miller, Deborah Azrael, David Hemenway. (2006) Belief in the Inevitability of Suicide: Results from a National Survey. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 36:1, 1-11
CrossRef15
Judith A.C. Rietjens, Agnes van der Heide, Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Paul J. van der Maas, Gerrit van der Wal. (2005) A comparison of attitudes towards end-of-life decisions: Survey among the Dutch general public and physicians. Social Science & Medicine 61:8, 1723-1732
CrossRef16
ATILLA SENIH MAYDA, ERDEM ÖZKARA, FUNDA ÇORAPÇIOGLU. (2005) Attitudes of oncologists toward euthanasia in Turkey. Palliative & Supportive Care 3:03,
CrossRef17
Farr A. Curlin, John D. Lantos, Chad J. Roach, Sarah A. Sellergren, Marshall H. Chin. (2005) Religious Characteristics of U.S. Physicians. A National Survey. Journal of General Internal Medicine 20:7, 629-634
CrossRef18
Mette L. Rurup, Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Gerrit van der Wal, Agnes van der Heide, Paul J. van Der Maas. (2005) A “Suicide Pill” For Older People: Attitudes of Physicians, the General Population, and Relatives of Patients who died After Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide in The Netherlands. Death Studies 29:6, 519-534
CrossRef19
Guido Miccinesi, Susanne Fischer, Eugenio Paci, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Colleen Cartwright, Agnes van der Heide, Tore Nilstun, Michael Norup, Freddy Mortier. (2005) Physicians’ attitudes towards end-of-life decisions: a comparison between seven countries. Social Science & Medicine 60:9, 1961-1974
CrossRef20
George E Dickinson, David Clark, Michelle Winslow, Rachael Marples. (2005) US physicians' attitudes concerning euthanasia and physician-assisted death: A systematic literature review. Mortality 10:1, 43-52
CrossRef21
Alice Ming-lin Chong, Shiu-yeu Fok. (2004) ATTITUDES TOWARD EUTHANASIA IN HONG KONG—A COMPARISON BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC. Death Studies 29:1, 29-54
CrossRef22
JOHN C. POLLOCK, SPIRO G. YULIS. (2004) Nationwide Newspaper Coverage of Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Community Structure Approach. Journal of Health Communication 9:4, 281-307
CrossRef23
Kay Mitchell, R Glynn Owens. (2004) Judgments of laypersons and general practitioners on justifiability and legality of providing assistance to die to a terminally ill patient: a view from New Zealand. Patient Education and Counseling 54:1, 15-20
CrossRef24
B R. Sharma. (2004) Withholding and Withdrawing of Life Support. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 25:2, 150-155
CrossRef25
Stephen J. Ziegler, Robert A. Jackson. (2004) Who's not afraid of Proposal B? An analysis of exit-poll data from Michigan's vote on physician-assisted suicide. Politics and the Life Sciences 23:1, 42-48
CrossRef26
Mary Ersek. (2004) The Continuing Challenge of Assisted Death. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing 6:1, 46-59
CrossRef27
C. O'Neill, D. Feenan, C. Hughes, D.A. McAlister. (2003) Physician and family assisted suicide: results from a study of public attitudes in Britain. Social Science & Medicine 57:4, 721-731
CrossRef28
B Witsenburg, H Weert, G ter Riet. (2003) Welke artsen gaan in op een euthanasievraag?. Huisarts en Wetenschap 46:8, 430-435
CrossRef29
Douglas Essinger. (2003) Attitudes of Tennessee Physicians toward Euthanasia and Assisted Death. Southern Medical Journal 96:5, 427-435
CrossRef30
George E. Dickinson, Carol J. Lancaster, David Clark, Sam H. Ahmedzai, William Noble. (2002) U.K. PHYSICIANS'ATTITUDES TOWARD ACTIVE VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA AND PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE. Death Studies 26:6, 479-490
CrossRef31
Teddy D Warner, Laura Weiss Roberts, Megan Smithpeter, Melinda Rogers, Brian Roberts, Teresita McCarty, Gregory Franchini, Cynthia Geppert, S.Scott Obenshain. (2001) Uncertainty and Opposition of Medical Students Toward Assisted Death Practices. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 22:2, 657-667
CrossRef32
Simon N. Whitney, Byron W. Brown, Howard Brody, Kirsten H. Alcser, Jerald G. Bachman, Henry T. Greely. (2001) Views of United States Physicians and Members of the American Medical Association House of Delegates on Physician-assisted Suicide. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16:5, 290-296
CrossRef33
Leslie Curry, Harold I. Schwartz, Cindy Gruman, Karen Blank. (2000) Physicians' Voices on Physician-Assisted Suicide: Looking Beyond the Numbers. Ethics & Behavior 10:4, 337-361
CrossRef34
KAREN D. NOVIELLI, MOHAMMADREZA HOJAT, THOMAS J. NASCA, JAMES B. ERDMANN, J. JON VELOSKI. (2000) Correlates of Physiciansʼ Endorsement of the Legalization of Physician-assisted Suicide. Academic Medicine 75:Supplement, S53-S55
CrossRef35
L. M. Cohen. (2000) Psychiatric Evaluation of Death-Hastening Requests: Lessons From Dialysis Discontinuation. Psychosomatics 41:3, 195-203
CrossRef36
Ellen L. Csikai. (2000) The Role of Values and Experience in Determining Social Workers' Attitudes Toward Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Social Work in Health Care 30:1, 75-95
CrossRef37
Ellen L. Csikai. (2000) Hospital Social Workers' Attitudes Toward Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Social Work in Health Care 30:1, 51-73
CrossRef38
Kurt Darr. (2000) Nexus: Physician-Assisted Suicide and Health Services Delivery. Hospital Topics 78:2, 28-32
CrossRef39
Angell, Marcia, . (1999) Caring for the Dying — Congressional Mischief. New England Journal of Medicine 341:25, 1923-1925
Full Text40
Judith C Ahronheim, Samuel B Davol. (1999) Pursuit of Assisted Dying. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 18:6, 401-405
CrossRef41
Judith Kennedy Schwarz. (1999) Assisted Dying and Nursing Practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 31:4, 367-374
CrossRef42
Markus Kemmelmeier, Eugene Burnstein, Kaiping Peng. (1999) Individualism and Authoritarianism Shape Attitudes Toward Physician-Assisted Suicide1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29:12, 2613-2631
CrossRef43
Tatsuo Akechi, Akira Kugaya, Hitoshi Okamura, Tomohito Nakano, Toru Okuyama, Ichiro Mikami, Yasuo Shima, Shigeto Yamawaki, Yosuke Uchitomi. (1999) Suicidal thoughts in cancer patients: Clinical experience in psycho-oncology. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 53:5, 569-573
CrossRef44
K. V. Heath, E. Wood, G. Bally, P. G. A. Cornelisse, R. S. Hogg. (1999) Experience in treating persons with HIV/AIDS and the legalization of assisted suicide: The views of Canadian physicians. AIDS Care 11:5, 501-510
CrossRef45
Ellen L. Csikai. (1999) Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 31:3-4, 49-63
CrossRef46
David W. Kissane. (1999) Euthanasia, dementia and ageing. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 12:4, 457-461
CrossRef47
(1999) Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Physician-Assisted Suicide. New England Journal of Medicine 340:10, 817-817
Full Text48
Cathy S. Berkman, Pamela F. Cavallo, Walda C. Chesnut, Nancy J. Holland. (1999) Attitudes toward Physician-Assisted Suicide among Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Palliative Medicine 2:1, 51-63
CrossRef49
Luigi Grassi, Katia Magnani, Mauro Ercolani. (1999) Attitudes Toward Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide Among Italian Primary Care Physicians. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 17:3, 188-196
CrossRef50
Chin, Arthur E., Hedberg, Katrina, Higginson, Grant K., Fleming, David W., . (1999) Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon — The First Year's Experience. New England Journal of Medicine 340:7, 577-583
Full Text51
Term A. Schmidt, Andrew D. Zechnich, Melissa Doherty. (1998) Oregon Emergency Medical Technicians' Attitudes toward Physician-assisted Suicide. Academic Emergency Medicine 5:9, 912-918
CrossRef52
Emanuel, Ezekiel J., Battin, Margaret P., . (1998) What Are the Potential Cost Savings from Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide?. New England Journal of Medicine 339:3, 167-172
Full Text53
Charles L. Sprung, Arieh Oppenheim. (1998) End-of-life decisions in critical care medicine-Where are we headed?. Critical Care Medicine 26:2, 200-202
CrossRef54
Kathy Faber-Langendoen. (1998) Death by request. Cancer 82:1, 35-41
CrossRef55
William L. Macdonald. (1998) Situational factors and attitudes toward voluntary euthanasia. Social Science & Medicine 46:1, 73-81
CrossRef56
Zhila Haghbin, Jon Streltzer, George P. danko. (1998) Assisted Suicide and AIDS Patients. Psychosomatics 39:1, 18-23
CrossRef57
Quill, Timothy E., , Dresser, Rebecca, , Brock, Dan W., . (1997) The Rule of Double Effect — A Critique of Its Role in End-of-Life Decision Making. New England Journal of Medicine 337:24, 1768-1771
Full Text58
David A. Asch, Judy A. Shea, M.Kathryn Jedrziewski, Charles L. Bosk. (1997) The limits of suffering: Critical care nurses' views of hospital care at the end of life. Social Science & Medicine 45:11, 1661-1668
CrossRef59
David A. Asch,,,, Michael L. DeKay,,. (1997) Euthanasia Among US Critical Care Nurses. Medical Care 35:9, 890-900
CrossRef60
Laura Weiss Roberts, Philip R. Muskin, Teddy D. Warner, Teresita McCarty, Brian B. Roberts, Donald C. Fidler. (1997) Attitudes of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatrists Toward Physician-Assisted Death Practices. Psychosomatics 38:5, 459-471
CrossRef61
Kirsten Toverud Severson. (1997) Dying cancer patients: Choices at the end of life. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 14:2, 94-98
CrossRef62
Susan D. Kowalski. (1997) Nevada Nurses' Attitudes Regarding Physician-Assisted Suicide. Clinical Nurse Specialist 11:3, 109-115
CrossRef63
Russell K. Portenoy, Nessa Coyle, Kathryn M. Kash, Frank Brescia, Colleen Scanlon, Daniel O’Hare, Robert I. Misbin, Jimmie Holland, Kathleen M. Foley. (1997) Determinants of the Wiffingness to Endorse Assisted Suicide. Psychosomatics 38:3, 277-287
CrossRef64
Slome, Lee R., Mitchell, Thomas F., Charlebois, Edwin, Benevedes, Jeffrey Moulton, Abrams, Donald I., . (1997) Physician-Assisted Suicide and Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Disease. New England Journal of Medicine 336:6, 417-421
Full Text65
Angell, Marcia, . (1997) The Supreme Court and Physician-Assisted Suicide — The Ultimate Right. New England Journal of Medicine 336:1, 50-53
Full Text66
Terri A. Schmidt, Andrew D. Zechnich, Virginia P. Tilden, Melinda A. Lee, Linda Ganzini, Heidi D. Nelson, Susan W. Tolle. (1996) Oregon Emergency Physicians' Experiences with, Attitudes toward, and Concerns about Physician-assisted Suicide. Academic Emergency Medicine 3:10, 938-945
CrossRef67
James G. Adams. (1996) Life or Death: Physician-assisted Suicide and Emergency Medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine 3:10, 909-910
CrossRef68
Franklin G. Miller, Howard Brody, Timothy E. Quill. (1996) Can Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Regulated Effectively?. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 24:3, 225-232
CrossRef69
John E. Linville. (1996) Physician-Assisted Suicide as a Constitutional Right. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 24:3, 198-206
CrossRef70
Orentlicher, David, . (1996) The Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide. New England Journal of Medicine 335:9, 663-667
Full Text71
(1996) Physician-Assisted Suicide. New England Journal of Medicine 335:7, 518-520
Full Text72
Campion, Edward W., . (1996) When a Mind Dies. New England Journal of Medicine 334:12, 791-792
Full Text
- Letters
