Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Timing of Sexual Intercourse in Relation to Ovulation — Effects on the Probability of Conception, Survival of the Pregnancy, and Sex of the Baby

Allen J. Wilcox, M.D., Ph.D., Clarice R. Weinberg, Ph.D., and Donna D. Baird, Ph.D.

N Engl J Med 1995; 333:1517-1521December 7, 1995

Abstract

Background

The timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation strongly influences the chance of conception, although the actual number of fertile days in a woman's menstrual cycle is uncertain. The timing of intercourse may also be associated with the sex of the baby.

Methods

We recruited 221 healthy women who were planning to become pregnant. At the same time the women stopped using birth-control methods, they began collecting daily urine specimens and keeping daily records of whether they had sexual intercourse. We measured estrogen and progesterone metabolites in urine to estimate the day of ovulation.

Results

In a total of 625 menstrual cycles for which the dates of ovulation could be estimated, 192 pregnancies were initiated, as indicated by increases in the urinary concentration of human chorionic gonadotropin around the expected time of implantation. Two thirds (n = 129) ended in live births. Conception occurred only when intercourse took place during a six-day period that ended on the estimated day of ovulation. The probability of conception ranged from 0.10 when intercourse occurred five days before ovulation to 0.33 when it occurred on the day of ovulation itself. There was no evident relation between the age of sperm and the viability of the conceptus, although only 6 percent of the pregnancies could be firmly attributed to sperm that were three or more days old. Cycles producing male and female babies had similar patterns of intercourse in relation to ovulation.

Conclusions

Among healthy women trying to conceive, nearly all pregnancies can be attributed to intercourse during a six-day period ending on the day of ovulation. For practical purposes, the timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation has no influence on the sex of the baby.

Media in This Article

Figure 1Serial Urinary Hormone Values in a Woman Trying to Conceive.
Figure 4Frequency Distribution of Live-Born Boys and Girls, According to the Time of the Most Recent Instance of Sexual Intercourse before Ovulation during the Cycle when Conception Occurred.
Article

Conception can occur only near the time of ovulation. However, the number of fertile days before or after ovulation is uncertain. Estimates range from 2 days per menstrual cycle1,2 to 10 days or more.3,4 Other issues related to fertility also remain unsettled. For example, what is the frequency of sexual intercourse that will maximize a couple's chance of achieving a pregnancy? If intercourse is poorly timed or infrequent, will sperm that have aged in the female reproductive tract before ovulation produce a less viable conceptus? Can a couple influence the sex of their baby by timing their intercourse in relation to ovulation? We addressed these questions in a prospective study of healthy women who were trying to conceive.

Methods

Study Design

The North Carolina Early Pregnancy Study was a prospective cohort study conducted to determine the risk of early loss of pregnancy among healthy women.5,6 From 1982 through 1985, we recruited from the local community 221 women who were planning to become pregnant. Women were excluded if they had a serious chronic illness or if they or their partners had a history of fertility problems. Ninety-six percent of the participants were white, and 71 percent were college-educated. Eighty percent were between the ages of 26 and 35, and one third were nulliparous.6 All the women who were enrolled gave their written informed consent, and our research protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Details of the protocol have been published previously.5,6 Women collected specimens of first morning urine daily from the time they stopped using birth control until the eighth week of clinical pregnancy, or for up to six months if no pregnancy was clinically evident. At the time of urine collection, the women recorded whether or not they had had sexual intercourse or vaginal bleeding in the previous 24 hours. Intercourse that was recorded on a given morning was assumed to have occurred the previous day. Urine collection was complete for 98 percent of the days in the study.

Laboratory Methods

We used the urine specimens to monitor the ovarian steroid changes that accompany ovulation. Assays of estrone 3-glucuronide (a metabolite of estradiol) and pregnanediol 3-glucuronide (a metabolite of progesterone) were carried out by direct radioimmunoassay.7,8 For eight cycles with ambiguous results on radioimmunoassay, data were supplemented by immunofluorometric assays.9,10

The ratio of urinary estrogen metabolites to progesterone metabolites has been discussed by Royston as a way to identify the day of ovulation.11 We refined Royston's algorithm, exploiting the rapid drop in the estrogen-to-progesterone ratio that signals the luteinization of the ovarian follicle.12 Using data on hormones from another study, we found that the day of ovulation selected by the algorithm was highly concordant with the peak urinary concentration of luteinizing hormone (which corresponds approximately with the day of ovulation13). Our data suggest that this method may be approximately equivalent in accuracy to methods based on the surge of serum luteinizing hormone.9

Pregnancy was identified in this study by the measurement of intact human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine with a highly sensitive and specific immunoradiometric assay.14 This assay was able to detect an increase in urinary hCG as early as six days after ovulation, at the expected time of implantation.

Figure 1Figure 1Serial Urinary Hormone Values in a Woman Trying to Conceive. shows the hormonal data from one of the participants. During her 19 weeks of participation, the woman in this example had two apparently normal menstrual cycles and then one in which a clinical pregnancy began. The increase in urinary pregnanediol 3-glucuronide in the latter part of each cycle indicates that ovulation took place during all three cycles. There is evidence in the first cycle of a conceptus that did not survive (indicated by the transient increase in hCG). Conception in the third cycle culminated in the birth of a healthy boy.

Statistical Analysis

If there were only one instance of sexual intercourse during each menstrual cycle, the timing of intercourse that led to conception would be obvious. However, there are usually several days on which intercourse is potentially responsible for any given conception (as was the case in Figure 1), a fact that complicates the estimation of the probability of conception on specific days.

In 1969, Barrett and Marshall proposed a method of estimating the daily probability of conception.15 Their model estimates the probability of conception associated with intercourse on specific days in relation to ovulation and implicitly assumes that the timing of intercourse is the only determinant of whether conception occurs. Schwartz et al. expanded this model by adding “cycle viability” as a component of the probability of conception.16 Cycle viability is based on all conditions other than the timing of intercourse that are necessary for conception. Conception cannot occur without, for example, the release of a healthy egg and adequate preparation of the endometrium for implantation. The expanded model allows for the occurrence of some nonviable cycles, but it assumes that in a viable cycle the effects of intercourse on different days are statistically independent. We have proposed a method17 for applying the model of Schwartz et al. that uses widely available statistical software (GLIM18) and allows adjustment for factors other than the timing of sexual intercourse. In the resulting model, the probability of cycle viability corresponds to the proportion of ovulatory menstrual cycles (those during which ovulation occurs) in which conception is potentially possible.

The Study Sample

A total of 221 women provided records for 708 menstrual cycles. In the subsequent hormone assays, five of these cycles were identified as double cycles (i.e., two apparently ovulatory cycles not separated by recorded menses). This may reflect a failure of the women to record an episode of menstrual bleeding or the occurrence of hormonal cycles without menstrual bleeding.19 Thus, 713 cycles were available for analysis. Pregnancy was detected chemically in 199 of these cycles.6,20 Forty-eight of the pregnancies ended within six weeks of the last menstrual period. The remaining 151 pregnancies lasted at least six weeks and were recognized clinically. In 15, the pregnancy was lost before birth; there was 1 molar pregnancy, 1 ectopic pregnancy, and 13 spontaneous abortions before 24 weeks of gestation. The remaining 136 pregnancies ended in live births.

Our analysis was restricted to menstrual cycles for which a day of ovulation could be identified. Five of the 713 menstrual cycles (<1 percent) were frankly anovulatory, with no increase in the urinary concentration of pregnanediol. A day of ovulation could not be identified for 48 other cycles (34 with missing data and 14 with irregular patterns of hormone production), leaving 660 cycles for which the day of ovulation could be specified (93 percent). For 35 of the 660 cycles (5 percent) either data on the timing of intercourse or data on urinary hCG concentrations were missing for crucial days. This left 625 ovulatory cycles in 217 women for the present analysis (88 percent of all cycles; 98 percent of the women). These 625 cycles included those in which conception occurred for 129 of the 136 live births (95 percent) and all 63 of the pregnancy losses.

Since one third of the conceptuses did not survive to delivery, the total probability of conception can be multiplied by two thirds to estimate the probability of conception leading to a successful pregnancy (assuming that the survival of the conceptus is independent of the timing of intercourse).

Results

Probability of Conception around the Time of Ovulation

The couples in this study had intercourse an average of once every three days, a frequency that makes it difficult in most pregnancies to attribute conception to intercourse on one particular day. As a preliminary exploration, we selected all 192 cycles in which conception occurred and examined the patterns of intercourse around ovulation to identify the range of fertile days. In every cycle in which conception occurred, there was intercourse at least once during the six consecutive days that ended with the day of ovulation. There was no shorter span of days that included intercourse in every cycle. Conversely, there were 31 cycles (of a total of 625) in which there was no intercourse during this six-day interval, and none resulted in conception.

As a preliminary estimate of the chance of conception on individual days, we identified all the cycles in which intercourse occurred on only a single day during the six-day period. On the basis of these 129 cycles (21 percent of the total), the proportion with a detected pregnancy ranged from 0.08 on the first day of the six-day period to 0.36 on the sixth day (the day of ovulation) (Figure 2Figure 2Probability of Conception on Specific Days near the Day of Ovulation.).

For all 625 cycles, we applied our statistical model to estimate the chance of conception on each of the six days in the fertile period. These probabilities ranged from 0.10 to 0.33 — figures similar to the proportions for the single-day cycles (Figure 2). Standard errors for the estimated probabilities are provided in Table 1Table 1Probability of Conception Based on 129 Menstrual Cycles in Which Sexual Intercourse Occurred on Only One Day during the Six-Day Interval Ending with the Day of Ovulation and on All 625 Cycles.. The proportion of ovulatory cycles potentially able to produce a pregnancy (cycle viability) was estimated to be 0.37 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.48).

We added one day to the six-day period in each direction and repeated the analysis. The estimated probability of conception was zero on both marginal days. However, we cannot exclude a probability of conception of up to 12 percent on either the seventh day before ovulation or the day after ovulation (95 percent confidence interval, 0 to 0.12).

If the cycle is viable (i.e., if conception is possible), the model assumes that each day of intercourse in the six-day period contributes independently to the probability of pregnancy. Thus, daily intercourse would produce the highest probability of conception (0.37). The estimated rate of conception falls to 0.33 with intercourse that averages every other day (assuming no special timing with regard to ovulation). At lower frequencies of intercourse, the rate of conception drops more rapidly; untimed intercourse averaging once per week would produce a 0.15 chance of conception per cycle. Considering live births only (which accounted for two thirds of the conceptions), the approximate probability would be 0.25 with daily intercourse, 0.22 with intercourse every other day, and 0.10 with weekly intercourse.

The assumption that each day on which intercourse occurs makes an independent contribution to conception is open to question. Frequent intercourse might decrease the potency of semen — for example, by depleting the number or quality of sperm.21-23 As a rough test of this hypothesis, we sorted cycles according to the number of days on which intercourse occurred during the six-day period. If frequent intercourse decreases the fertilizing capacity of sperm, then the observed number of pregnancies initiated in cycles with more frequent intercourse should be less than that predicted by the combined day-specific probabilities. Similarly, cycles with intercourse on only one day should produce more pregnancies than predicted. Table 2Table 2Predicted and Observed Numbers of Pregnancies, According to the Number of Days when Sexual Intercourse Occurred during the Six-Day Interval Ending with the Day of Ovulation. shows the predicted and observed numbers of pregnancies for each frequency of intercourse (from none to daily) during the six-day period. The model fits well across the range of values for the frequency of intercourse, with no overall trend toward lower fertility with a higher frequency of intercourse.

Age of Sperm and Survival of the Pregnancy

It has been speculated that fertilization by old sperm (i.e., sperm that remain in the female reproductive tract for a relatively long time before fertilization) produces damaged conceptuses and leads to loss of pregnancy.24 In order to address this question, we arranged cycles during which conception occurred according to the number of days between ovulation and the most recent instance of intercourse; we then divided the conceptions according to whether or not they resulted in live birth. Only 6 percent of the conceptions could be firmly attributed to fertilization by sperm three or more days old. The pattern of intercourse in relation to ovulation was similar overall for conceptions that ended in fetal loss and those that ended in live birth (Figure 3Figure 3Frequency Distribution of Live Births and Pregnancy Losses, According to the Time of the Most Recent Instance of Sexual Intercourse before Ovulation during the Cycle when Conception Occurred.).

Timing of Intercourse and the Sex of the Baby

Some have argued that the timing of intercourse in relation to ovulation can influence the sex of the conceptus.25 We tested for any association between timing and the sex of the infant by dividing live births according to whether the babies were boys or girls and again plotting the distribution of cycles during which conception occurred according to the day of most recent instance of intercourse (Figure 4Figure 4Frequency Distribution of Live-Born Boys and Girls, According to the Time of the Most Recent Instance of Sexual Intercourse before Ovulation during the Cycle when Conception Occurred.). There were no systematic differences between the patterns of intercourse that produced boys and the patterns that produced girls.

Discussion

Despite its great practical importance, the number of fertile days during the menstrual cycle has been difficult to specify. Some authors have calculated a theoretical period of two fertile days, based on estimates of the survival of sperm and eggs.1,2 A multicenter study by the World Health Organization estimated that there are 10 presumably fertile days per cycle, on the basis of the characteristics of the cervical mucus.3

Records made by British couples using natural family planning in the 1960s show a 13-day period during which pregnancies were apparently conceived.11 Barrett and Marshall were the first to use these data to estimate a fertile period15; the data were reanalyzed by Schwartz et al. in 198016 and supplemented and reanalyzed by Royston in 1982.11 The day of ovulation was estimated from women's records of their basal body temperatures; this method is subject to considerable error.26 Moreover, the women had been asked to record the days on which intercourse occurred but not days without intercourse. Errors of omission could lead to the misattribution of conception to intercourse on days far from ovulation, a fact that may help explain the very broad fertile period calculated from these data.

Our data suggest that the fertile period lasts about six days and ends on the day of ovulation. The rapid drop in the probability of conception after ovulation suggests a short survival time for ova, or perhaps a change in the cervical mucus after ovulation that obstructs the entry of new sperm. In contrast, the finding that there are five fertile days before ovulation indicates that sperm retain their ability to fertilize an ovum for up to five days in the female reproductive tract. This is consistent with indirect observations regarding the survival of sperm. Motile sperm have been found in the cervical mucus for seven or more days after insemination,27,28 and sperm retain the capacity to fertilize human ova in vitro after five days at room temperature.29

Some couples are advised to maximize their chance of pregnancy by timing their intercourse to coincide with ovulation (for example, using kits to detect the surge of luteinizing hormone). If the probability of conception declines soon after ovulation, couples who abstain from intercourse until they have evidence of ovulation may miss earlier opportunities for conception.

Even with daily intercourse, most ovulatory menstrual cycles (an estimated 63 percent in our study) may be incapable of producing a conception. Factors besides intercourse apparently have a strong role in determining fertility. The model we have used assumes that the probability of a viable cycle is evenly distributed among couples, although couples in fact tend to vary in the proportion of cycles that are viable.30 The probability of conception could be higher or lower for specific couples. In particular, couples who have been trying to conceive for six months or more (longer than the women in our study) will, on average, have lower cycle viability and thus a lower probability of conception.

Frequency of Intercourse and the Probability of Conception

Closely spaced ejaculations reduce the sperm count, the concentration of sperm, and the percentage of sperm that are motile.21-23 Thus, frequent ejaculation could theoretically reduce the potency of subsequent batches of sperm. However, we found scant evidence of this phenomenon in this study. Our data provide no support for a recommendation that normal couples seeking pregnancy should limit the frequency of sexual intercourse.

Age of the Gamete and Survival of the Pregnancy

Some data on animals have suggested that fertilization by aging sperm may decrease the viability of the resulting conceptus.24 Studies in humans provide few data on this issue and little evidence that older sperm cause spontaneous abortions.31,32 We found no evidence for this association in our data, although only 12 conceptions could be attributed to sperm that were more than two days old. The question of the potential harm caused by aging sperm is likely to be resolved only by data from much larger cohort studies. The most informative would be studies of couples trying to avoid pregnancy by natural family planning, since accidental pregnancies among these couples are likely to result from intercourse at the extremes of the fertile interval.24

The fertilization of aging ova (that is, at some extended time after ovulation) may be more harmful to the conceptus than fertilization by aging sperm.24 We cannot evaluate the risk to conceptions involving old ova because no pregnancies in our study could be attributed to intercourse after the day of ovulation.

Timing of Intercourse and the Sex of the Baby

Various claims have been made for methods of selecting the sex of the infant through the deliberate timing of intercourse. Shettles and Rorvik recommend that couples who wish to have a boy should time their intercourse to coincide with ovulation, with up to 85 percent success claimed for the selection of boys and 80 percent for the selection of girls.25 In contrast, Zarutskie et al. concluded in their review of the published literature that if there is any tendency, it is for more females than males to be conceived when coitus occurs close to ovulation.33 We previously reported a possible association between the sex of the baby and the length of the follicular phase.34 However, we found no association between the sex of the baby and the timing of intercourse in relation to ovulation. We conclude that the deliberate timing of intercourse around the day of ovulation has no practical value in sex selection.

In summary, we have described the fertile days of the menstrual cycle for a group of healthy women. By analyzing data on the day of ovulation (identified by means of hormone assays of daily urine specimens) and daily records of sexual intercourse, we found that all conceptions resulted from intercourse that occurred during a six-day interval ending on the day of ovulation. The sex of the baby was not related to the timing of intercourse in relation to ovulation.

We are indebted to Dr. Paul Musey of Atlanta University, who supervised the steroid assays; to Drs. Del Collins of the University of Kentucky and James Kesner of the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health; to the staff of the laboratory of Dr. Robert Canfield at Columbia University, who performed the assays for human chorionic gonadotropin under the supervision of Drs. John O'Connor and Glenn Armstrong; to Joy Pierce, who directed the original field study and subsequently managed the storage and shipment of the 27,000 urine specimens; to Dr. D. Robert McConnaughey, who created data files and graphics; and to Drs. Gertrud Berkowitz, Pierre Buekens, Glinda Cooper, Curtis Eshelman, Ronald Gray, Paige Hornsby, David Katz, Ruth Little, Andrew Rowland, Dale Sandler, David Savitz, Katherine Shea, and Joe Leigh Simpson for their valuable comments on previous drafts of this paper.

Source Information

From the Epidemiology Branch (A.J.W., D.D.B.) and the Statistics and Biomathematics Branch (C.R.W.), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, N.C.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Wilcox at the Epidemiology Branch, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

References

References

  1. 1

    Potter RG Jr. Length of the fertile period. Milbank Q 1961;39:132-162
    Web of Science

  2. 2

    Bongaarts J. The proximate determinants of natural marital fertility. In: Bulatao RA, Lee RD, Hollerbach PE, Bongaarts J, eds. Determinants of fertility in developing countries. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 1983:103-38.

  3. 3

    World Health Organization. A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. III. Characteristics of the menstrual cycle and of the fertile phase. Fertil Steril 1983;40:773-778
    Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    France JT, Graham FM, Gosling L, Hair P, Knox BS. Characteristics of natural conception cycles occurring in a prospective study of sex preselection: fertility awareness symptoms, hormone levels, sperm survival, and pregnancy outcome. Int J Fertil 1992;37:244-255
    Medline

  5. 5

    Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Wehmann RE, Armstrong EG, Canfield RE, Nisula BC. Measuring early pregnancy loss: laboratory and field methods. Fertil Steril 1985;44:366-374
    Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Connor JF, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1988;319:189-194
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  7. 7

    Wright K, Collins DC, Musey PI, Preedy JRK. Direct radioimmunoassay of specific urinary estrogen glucosiduronates in normal men and nonpregnant women. Steroids 1978;31:407-426
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Samarajeewa P, Cooley G, Kellie AE. The radioimmunoassay of pregnanediol-3 alpha-glucuronide. J Steroid Biochem 1979;11:1165-1171
    CrossRef | Medline

  9. 9

    Baird DD, McConnaughey DR, Weinberg CR, et al. Application of a method for estimating day of ovulation using urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites. Epidemiology 1995;6:547-550
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  10. 10

    Kesner JS, Knecht EA, Krieg EF Jr, et al. Validations of time-resolved fluoroimmunoassays for urinary estrone 3-glucuronide and pregnanediol 3-glucuronide. Steroids 1994;59:205-211
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Royston JP. Basal body temperature, ovulation and the risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg. Biometrics 1982;38:397-406
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Baird DD, Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, McConnaughey DR, Musey PI. Using the ratio of urinary oestrogen and progesterone metabolites to estimate day of ovulation. Stat Med 1991;10:255-266
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Collins WP. Biochemical approaches to ovulation prediction and detection and the location of the fertile period in women. In: Jeffcoate SL, ed. Ovulation: methods for its prediction and detection. Vol. 3 of Current topics in reproductive endocrinology. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley, 1983:49-66.

  14. 14

    Armstrong EG, Ehrlich PH, Birken S, et al. Use of a highly sensitive and specific immunoradiometric assay for detection of human chorionic gonadotropin in urine of normal, nonpregnant, and pregnant individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1984;59:867-874
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Barrett JC, Marshall J. The risk of conception on different days of the menstrual cycle. Popul Stud 1969;23:455-461
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Schwartz D, MacDonald PDM, Heuchel V. Fecundability, coital frequency and the viability of ova. Popul Stud 1980;34:397-400
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Weinberg CR, Gladen BC, Wilcox AJ. Models relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception and the sex of the baby. Biometrics 1994;50:358-367
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Baker JR, Nedler JA. The GLIM system: release 3 manual. Oxford, England: Numerical Algorithms Group, 1978.

  19. 19

    Check JH, Shanis BS, Stanley C, Chase JS, Nazari A, Wu CH. Amenorrhea in an ovulatory woman despite a normal uterine cavity: case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:598-599
    Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Risk factors for early pregnancy loss. Epidemiology 1990;1:382-385
    CrossRef | Medline

  21. 21

    MacLeod J, Gold RZ. The male factor in fertility and infertility. V. Effect of continence on sperm quality. Fertil Steril 1952;3:297-315
    Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Freund M. Interrelationships among the characteristics of human semen and factors affecting semen-specimen quality. J Reprod Fertil 1962;4:143-159
    CrossRef | Medline

  23. 23

    Poland ML, Moghisse KS, Giblin PT, Ager JW, Olson JM. Variation of semen measures within normal men. Fertil Steril 1985;44:396-400
    Web of Science | Medline

  24. 24

    Simpson JL, Gray RH, Queenan JT, et al. Pregnancy outcome associated with natural family planning (NFP): scientific basis and experimental design for an international cohort study. Adv Contracept 1988;4:247-264
    CrossRef | Medline

  25. 25

    Shettles LB, Rorvik DM. How to choose the sex of your baby. New York: Doubleday, 1984.

  26. 26

    Campbell KL. Methods of monitoring ovarian function and predicting ovulation: summary of a meeting. Res Front Fertil Regul 1985;3:1-16
    Medline

  27. 27

    Perloff WH, Steinberger E. In vivo survival of spermatozoa in cervical mucus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1964;88:439-442
    Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Glezerman M. Artificial insemination. In: Insler V, Lunenfeld B, eds. Infertility: male and female. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1993.

  29. 29

    Cohen J, Fehilly CB, Walters DE. Prolonged storage of human spermatozoa at room temperature or in a refrigerator. Fertil Steril 1985;44:254-262
    Web of Science | Medline

  30. 30

    Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Gladen B. The probability of conception as related to the timing of intercourse around ovulation. In: Scientific bases and problems of natural fertility regulation. Pontifical Academy of Sciences (in press).

  31. 31

    World Health Organization. A prospective multicentre study of the ovulation method of natural family planning. IV. The outcome of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1984;41:593-598
    Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Guerrero R, Rojas OI. Spontaneous abortion and aging of human ova and spermatozoa. N Engl J Med 1975;293:573-575
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  33. 33

    Zarutskie PW, Muller CH, Magone M, Soules MR. The clinical relevance of sex selection techniques. Fertil Steril 1989;52:891-905
    Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    Weinberg CR, Baird DD, Wilcox AJ. The sex of the baby may be related to the length of the follicular phase in the conception cycle. Hum Reprod 1995;10:304-307
    Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (238)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Susan Kelly-Weeder. (2012) Helping patients through the pain of infertility. The Nurse Practitioner 37:2, 47-52
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Gad Saad, Eric Stenstrom. (2012) Calories, beauty, and ovulation: The effects of the menstrual cycle on food and appearance-related consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    A.E. Czeizel. (2012) Experience of the Hungarian Preconception Service between 1984 and 2010. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    AMY LU, JACINTA C. BEEHNER, NANCY M. CZEKALA, CAROLA BORRIES. (2012) Juggling Priorities: Female Mating Tactics in Phayre's Leaf Monkeys. American Journal of Primatologyn/a-n/a
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Zoltan Kozinszky, Iván Devosa, János Sikovanyecz, Dávid Szabó, Zoltán Pál, Katalin Barabás, Attila Pál. (2011) Predictive model of repeat induced abortion in Hungary. Central European Journal of Medicine 6:6, 701-709
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    Ashley R. Richardson, Fraidy N. Maltz. (2011) Ulipristal Acetate: Review of the Efficacy and Safety of a Newly Approved Agent for Emergency Contraception. Clinical Therapeutics
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    J. P. Higham, K. D. Hughes, L. J. N. Brent, C. Dubuc, A. Engelhardt, M. Heistermann, D. Maestriperi, L. R. Santos, M. Stevens. (2011) Familiarity affects the assessment of female facial signals of fertility by free-ranging male rhesus macaques. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278:1723, 3452-3458
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Gabriela Noé, Horacio B. Croxatto, Ana María Salvatierra, Verónica Reyes, Claudio Villarroel, Carla Muñoz, Gabriela Morales, Anita Retamales. (2011) Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation. Contraception 84:5, 486-492
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Diana Mansour, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Pirjo Inki, Jeffrey T. Jensen. (2011) Fertility after discontinuation of contraception: a comprehensive review of the literature. Contraception 84:5, 465-477
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    Sarah Johnson, Jayne Ellis, Sonya Godbert, Sharon Ali, Michael Zinaman. (2011) Comparison of a digital ovulation test with three popular line ovulation tests to investigate user accuracy and certainty. Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics 5:6, 467-473
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    D. Subtil, H. Grandjean, C. Vayssière, E. Verspyck. (2011) Grossesse prolongée et terme dépassé – Introduction. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Steven R Bayer. 2011. Factors affecting fertility. , 11-18.
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    L.J. Salomon. (2011) Comment déterminer la date de début de grossesse ?. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    C. Jamin, G. André, A. Audebert, S. Christin-Maître, D. Elia, T. Harvey, B. Letombe, P. Lopes, C. Moreau, I. Nisand, C. Pélissier. (2011) Oublis de la contraception hormonale : réflexions sur leur prise en charge en pratique quotidienne. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Anna Glasier, Sharon T. Cameron, Diana Blithe, Bruno Scherrer, Henri Mathe, Delphine Levy, Erin Gainer, Andre Ulmann. (2011) Can we identify women at risk of pregnancy despite using emergency contraception? Data from randomized trials of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel. Contraception 84:4, 363-367
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    Sarah P Shrader, Larissa N Hall, Kelly R Ragucci, Sally Rafie. (2011) Updates in Hormonal Emergency Contraception. Pharmacotherapy 31:9, 887-895
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    Susan G. Brown, Marites J. Calibuso, Amanda L. Roedl. (2011) Women’s Sexuality, Well-Being, and the Menstrual Cycle: Methodological Issues and Their Interrelationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior 40:4, 755-765
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Constance Dubuc, Laura Muniz, Michael Heistermann, Antje Engelhardt, Anja Widdig. (2011) Testing the priority-of-access model in a seasonally breeding primate species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65:8, 1615-1627
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    Gilda Piaggio, Nathalie Kapp, Helena von Hertzen. (2011) Effect on pregnancy rates of the delay in the administration of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a combined analysis of four WHO trials. Contraception 84:1, 35-39
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    P J Southern, J E Horbul, B R L Miller, D M Maher. (2011) Coming of age: reconstruction of heterosexual HIV-1 transmission in human ex vivo organ culture systems. Mucosal Immunology 4:4, 383-396
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    Jade L Sullivan, Marilyn N Bulloch. (2011) Ulipristal acetate: a new emergency contraceptive. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology 4:4, 417-427
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    James R. Roney, Zachary L. Simmons, Peter B. Gray. (2011) Changes in estradiol predict within-women shifts in attraction to facial cues of men's testosterone. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36:5, 742-749
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Balasubramanian Bhagavath, Sandra A. Carson. (2011) Ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an update. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Paul R. Brezina, Elisabeth Haberl, Edward Wallach. (2011) At home testing: optimizing management for the infertility physician. Fertility and Sterility 95:6, 1867-1878
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Martin N. Muller, Melissa Emery Thompson, Sonya M. Kahlenberg, Richard W. Wrangham. (2011) Sexual coercion by male chimpanzees shows that female choice may be more apparent than real. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65:5, 921-933
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Kate McKeage, Jamie D. Croxtall. (2011) Ulipristal Acetate. Drugs 71:7, 935-945
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    M. Mihm, S. Gangooly, S. Muttukrishna. (2011) The normal menstrual cycle in women. Animal Reproduction Science 124:3-4, 229-236
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    A. M. Z. Jukic, C. R. Weinberg, D. D. Baird, A. J. Wilcox. (2011) The association of maternal factors with delayed implantation and the initial rise of urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin. Human Reproduction 26:4, 920-926
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Annie Bissonnette, Nicole Bischofberger, Carel P Schaik. (2011) Mating skew in Barbary macaque males: the role of female mating synchrony, female behavior, and male–male coalitions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65:2, 167-182
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Claudia L. Nassaralla, Joseph B. Stanford, K. Diane Daly, Mary Schneider, Karen C. Schliep, Richard J. Fehring. (2011) Characteristics of the Menstrual Cycle After Discontinuation of Oral Contraceptives. Journal of Women's Health 20:2, 169-177
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Pascaline Dupas. (2011) Do Teenagers Respond to HIV Risk Information? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3:1, 1-34
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Zamip P. Patel, Craig S. Niederberger. (2011) Male Factor Assessment in Infertility. Medical Clinics of North America 95:1, 223-234
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Hsiu-Lin HUANG, Yu-Shin CHENG, Kuo-Tai YANG, Chia-Hsuan CHEN, Mu-Chiou HUANG, Wen-Hwei HSU. (2011) Genome-Wide Transcript Expression Analysis in the Uterovaginal Junction in Association with Fertile Period in Tsaiya Ducks. Journal of Reproduction and Development 57:6, 731-736
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    G. Teklenburg, M. Salker, C. Heijnen, N. S. Macklon, J. J. Brosens. (2010) The molecular basis of recurrent pregnancy loss: impaired natural embryo selection. Molecular Human Reproduction 16:12, 886-895
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Susanne Quallich. (2010) Male infertility. The Nurse Practitioner 35:12, 28-36
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    A.M. Noorlander, J.P.M. Geraedts, J.B.M. Melissen. (2010) Female gender pre-selection by maternal diet in combination with timing of sexual intercourse – a prospective study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 21:6, 794-802
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Marta Durand, Riitta Koistinen, Mayel Chirinos, José Luis Rodríguez, Elena Zambrano, Markku Seppälä, Fernando Larrea. (2010) Hormonal evaluation and midcycle detection of intrauterine glycodelin in women treated with levonorgestrel as in emergency contraception. Contraception 82:6, 526-533
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Stephen J. Genuis, Thomas P. Bouchard. (2010) High-tech family planning: reproductive regulation through computerized fertility monitoring. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 153:2, 124-130
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Saul L. Miller, Jon K. Maner. (2010) Evolution and relationship maintenance: Fertility cues lead committed men to devalue relationship alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46:6, 1081-1084
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson. (2010) Mechanism of action of emergency contraception. Contraception 82:5, 404-409
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    Roberto Matorras, Beatriz Corcóstegui, Judith Esteban, Olga Ramón, Begoña Prieto, Antonia Expósito, José Ignacio Pijoan. (2010) Fertility in women with minimal endometriosis compared with normal women was assessed by means of a donor insemination program in unstimulated cycles. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 203:4, 345.e1-345.e6
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Mary K Samplaski, Ashok Agarwal, Rakesh Sharma, Edmund Sabanegh. (2010) New generation of diagnostic tests for infertility: Review of specialized semen tests. International Journal of Urology 17:10, 839-847
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    V. Brache, L. Cochon, C. Jesam, R. Maldonado, A. M. Salvatierra, D. P. Levy, E. Gainer, H. B. Croxatto. (2010) Immediate pre-ovulatory administration of 30 mg ulipristal acetate significantly delays follicular rupture. Human Reproduction 25:9, 2256-2263
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    Xiao Bilian, Zhao Heng, Wu Shang-chun, Jing Xiao-ping, He Chang-hai, Shao Wen-qi, Lei Zhen-wu. (2010) Conception probabilities at different days of menstrual cycle in Chinese women. Fertility and Sterility 94:4, 1208-1211
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    J. P. Higham, L. J. N. Brent, C. Dubuc, A. K. Accamando, A. Engelhardt, M. S. Gerald, M. Heistermann, M. Stevens. (2010) Color signal information content and the eye of the beholder: a case study in the rhesus macaque. Behavioral Ecology 21:4, 739-746
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Diana G. Foster, Tina R. Raine, Claire Brindis, Daria P. Rostovtseva, Philip D. Darney. (2010) Should Providers Give Women Advance Provision of Emergency Contraceptive Pills? A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Women's Health Issues 20:4, 242-247
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Melanie Landay, Kristin A. Bendikson. 2010. Work-up of Infertility. , 429-432.
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    Ian B. Tilley, Ronna Jurow. 2010. Fertility Awareness Family Planning Methods. , 504-507.
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    Gabriela Noé, Horacio B. Croxatto, Ana María Salvatierra, Verónica Reyes, Claudio Villarroel, Carla Muñoz, Gabriela Morales, Anita Retamales. (2010) Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation. Contraception 81:5, 414-420
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    B. D. Charlton, J. L. Keating, L. Rengui, Y. Huang, R. R. Swaisgood. (2010) Female giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) chirps advertise the caller's fertile phase. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277:1684, 1101-1106
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    Eliana Ein-Mor, David Mankuta, Drorith Hochner-Celnikier, Arye Hurwitz, Ronit Haimov-Kochman. (2010) Sex ratio is remarkably constant. Fertility and Sterility 93:6, 1961-1965
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    (2010) NHG-Standaard Subfertiliteit. Huisarts en wetenschap 2010:4, 203-214
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    Rajeshwari Sundaram, Germaine M. Buck Louis, Sungduk Kim. 2010. Statistical Modeling of Human Fecundity. .
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Bruno Scarpa. 2010. Probabilistic and Statistical Models for Conception. .
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    K. E. Hester, M. J.K. Harper, D. M. Duffy. (2010) Oral administration of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor meloxicam blocks ovulation in non-human primates when administered to simulate emergency contraception. Human Reproduction 25:2, 360-367
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    A. Vandermaelen, Y. Englert. (2010) Human immunodeficiency virus serodiscordant couples on highly active antiretroviral therapies with undetectable viral load: conception by unprotected sexual intercourse or by assisted reproduction techniques?. Human Reproduction 25:2, 374-379
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Vivian W. Y Leung, Marc Levine, Judith A Soon. (2010) Mechanisms of Action of Hormonal Emergency Contraceptives. Pharmacotherapy 30:2, 158-168
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Paul Fine, Henri Mathé, Savita Ginde, Vanessa Cullins, Johanna Morfesis, Erin Gainer. (2010) Ulipristal Acetate Taken 48–120 Hours After Intercourse for Emergency Contraception. Obstetrics & Gynecology 115:2, Part 1, 257-263
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    C. Jesam, A. M. Salvatierra, J. L. Schwartz, H. B. Croxatto. (2010) Suppression of follicular rupture with meloxicam, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: potential for emergency contraception. Human Reproduction 25:2, 368-373
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Paul B. Marshburn, Mark Alanis, Michelle L. Matthews, Rebecca Usadi, Margaret H. Papadakis, Susan Kullstam, Bradley S. Hurst. (2010) A short period of ejaculatory abstinence before intrauterine insemination is associated with higher pregnancy rates. Fertility and Sterility 93:1, 286-288
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Constance Dubuc, Lauren J. N. Brent, Amanda K. Accamando, Melissa S. Gerald, Ann MacLarnon, Stuart Semple, Michael Heistermann, Antje Engelhardt. (2009) Sexual Skin Color Contains Information About the Timing of the Fertile Phase in Free-ranging Macaca mulatta. International Journal of Primatology 30:6, 777-789
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    K. Hampton, D. Mazza. (2009) Should spontaneous or timed intercourse guide couples trying to conceive?. Human Reproduction 24:12, 3236-3237
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    D.A. Beyer. (2009) Intrauterine Insemination (IUI). Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 7:4, 263-273
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Jian Wang, Stephen J. Usala, Faye OʼBrien-Usala, William C. Biggs, Mark W. Vaughn, Gregory B. McKenna. (2009) The Fertile and Infertile Phases of the Menstrual Cycle are Signaled by Cervical-Vaginal Fluid Die Swell Functions. The Endocrinologist 19:6, 291-297
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Gretchen S. Stuart. (2009) Fourteen million women with limited options: HIV/AIDS and highly effective reversible contraception in sub-Saharan Africa. Contraception 80:5, 412-416
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Cécile Garcia, Keiko Shimizu, Michael Huffman. (2009) Relationship between sexual interactions and the timing of the fertile phase in captive female Japanese macaques ( Macaca fuscata ). American Journal of Primatology 71:10, 868-879
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    C. Stanley Chan, Mandy Harting, Ted Rosen. (2009) Systemic and barrier contraceptives for the dermatologist: a review. International Journal of Dermatology 48:8, 795-814
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    L. Zhang, J. Chen, Y. Wang, F. Ren, W. Yu, L. Cheng. (2009) Pregnancy outcome after levonorgestrel-only emergency contraception failure: a prospective cohort study. Human Reproduction 24:7, 1605-1611
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    Agnès Daspre, Michael Heistermann, J. Keith Hodges, Phyllis C. Lee, Lyliane Rosetta. (2009) Signals of female reproductive quality and fertility in colony-living baboons ( Papio h. anubis ) in relation to ensuring paternal investment. American Journal of Primatology 71:7, 529-538
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Corry Gellatly. (2009) Trends in Population Sex Ratios May be Explained by Changes in the Frequencies of Polymorphic Alleles of a Sex Ratio Gene. Evolutionary Biology 36:2, 190-200
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    James Trussell. (2009) Understanding contraceptive failure. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 23:2, 199-209
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Kirsten I. Black. (2009) Developments and challenges in emergency contraception. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 23:2, 221-231
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    Ivo Brosens, Pierre Hernalsteen, André Devos, Brianna Cloke, Jan J. Brosens. (2009) Self-assessment of the cervical pupil sign as a new fertility-awareness method. Fertility and Sterility 91:3, 937-939
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Ellen R. Wiebe, James Trussell. (2009) Contraceptive failure related to estimated cycle day of conception relative to the start of the last bleeding episode. Contraception 79:3, 178-181
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Laurence A. Cole, Donald G. Ladner, Francis W. Byrn. (2009) The normal variabilities of the menstrual cycle. Fertility and Sterility 91:2, 522-527
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    (2009) Intrauterine insemination. Human Reproduction Update 15:3, 265-277
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    Helena von Hertzen, Emily M Godfrey. (2009) Emergency contraception: the state of the art. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 18, 28-31
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    David T Baird. (2009) Emergency contraception: how does it work?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 18, 32-36
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    James P. Higham, Stuart Semple, Ann MacLarnon, Michael Heistermann, Caroline Ross. (2009) Female reproductive signaling, and male mating behavior, in the olive baboon. Hormones and Behavior 55:1, 60-67
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Dominique de Ziegler, Timothée Fraisse, Anne Elodie Millischer-Belaïche, Charles Chapron. 2009. Pelvic Imaging in Reproductive Endocrinology. , 825-871.
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    Donald K. Clifton, Robert A. Steiner. 2009. Neuroendocrinology of Reproduction. , 3-33.
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Robert L. Barbieri. 2009. Female Infertility. , 517-546.
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    RICHARD J. FEHRING, MARY SCHNEIDER, MARY LEE BARRON. (2008) EFFICACY OF THE MARQUETTE METHOD OF NATURAL FAMILY PLANNING. MCN, The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing 33:6, 348-354
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    (2008) Optimizing natural fertility. Fertility and Sterility 90:5, S1-S6
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    Richard J. Fehring, Mary Schneider. (2008) Variability in the hormonally estimated fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Fertility and Sterility 90:4, 1232-1235
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    GORDON B. DAHL, ENRICO MORETTI. (2008) The Demand for Sons. Review of Economic Studies 75:4, 1085-1120
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    2008. Investigating infertility. , 52-113.
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Laramie D. Taylor. (2008) Cads, Dads, and Magazines: Women's Sexual Preferences and Articles about Sex and Relationships. Communication Monographs 75:3, 270-289
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    R. M. Stumpf, M. Emery Thompson, C. D. Knott. (2008) A Comparison of Female Mating Strategies in Pan troglodytes and Pongo spp.. International Journal of Primatology 29:4, 865-884
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Melissa Emery Thompson, Richard W. Wrangham. (2008) Male Mating Interest Varies with Female Fecundity in Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii of Kanyawara, Kibale National Park. International Journal of Primatology 29:4, 885-905
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    H.K. Snick, J.A. Collins, J.L.H. Evers. (2008) What is the most valid comparison treatment in trials of intrauterine insemination, timed or uninfluenced intercourse? A systematic review and meta-analysis of indirect evidence. Human Reproduction 23:10, 2239-2245
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Katrin Brauch, Keith Hodges, Antje Engelhardt, Kerstin Fuhrmann, Eric Shaw, Michael Heistermann. (2008) Sex-specific reproductive behaviours and paternity in free-ranging Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62:9, 1453-1466
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    Hussein Qublan, Yousef Tahat, Anwar Al-Masri. (2008) Primary ovarian pregnancy after the empty follicle syndrome: A case report. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 34:3, 422-424
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    Ian S. Fraser. (2008) Response to the Letter to the Editor. Contraception 77:6, 464-465
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    S. W Gangestad, R. Thornhill. (2008) Human oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275:1638, 991-1000
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    D. Pfefferle, K. Brauch, M. Heistermann, J. K. Hodges, J. Fischer. (2008) Female Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus) copulation calls do not reveal the fertile phase but influence mating outcome. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275:1634, 571-578
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    James P. Higham, Ann M. MacLarnon, Caroline Ross, Michael Heistermann, Stuart Semple. (2008) Baboon sexual swellings: Information content of size and color. Hormones and Behavior 53:3, 452-462
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    Claudia Barelli, Michael Heistermann, Christophe Boesch, Ulrich H. Reichard. (2008) Mating patterns and sexual swellings in pair-living and multimale groups of wild white-handed gibbons, Hylobates lar. Animal Behaviour 75:3, 991-1001
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    Germaine M.B. Louis, Maureen A. Cooney, Courtney D. Lynch, Alexis Handal. (2008) Periconception window: advising the pregnancy-planning couple. Fertility and Sterility 89:2, e119-e121
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    Ebonya L Washington. (2008) Female Socialization: How Daughters Affect Their Legislator Fathers' Voting on Women's Issues. American Economic Review 98:1, 311-332
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Michael Heistermann, Katrin Brauch, Ulrike Möhle, Dana Pfefferle, John Dittami, Keith Hodges. (2008) Female ovarian cycle phase affects the timing of male sexual activity in free-ranging Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) of Gibraltar. American Journal of Primatology 70:1, 44-53
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    Octavia M. Palmer, David G. Grenache, Ann M. Gronowski. (2007) The NACB Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Point of Care Reproductive Testing. Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology 6:4, 265-272
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    Bruno Scarpa, David B. Dunson, Elena Giacchi. (2007) Bayesian selection of optimal rules for timing intercourse to conceive by using calendar and mucus. Fertility and Sterility 88:4, 915-924
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    James Trussell, Kelly Cleland. (2007) Levonorgestrel for emergency contraception. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2:5, 565-576
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    Katrin Brauch, Dana Pfefferle, Keith Hodges, Ulrike Möhle, Julia Fischer, Michael Heistermann. (2007) Female sexual behavior and sexual swelling size as potential cues for males to discern the female fertile phase in free-ranging Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) of Gibraltar. Hormones and Behavior 52:3, 375-383
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    Rafael T. Mikolajczyk, Joseph B. Stanford. (2007) Levonorgestrel emergency contraception: a joint analysis of effectiveness and mechanism of action. Fertility and Sterility 88:3, 565-571
    CrossRef

  107. 107

    Vivian Brache, Horacio Croxatto, Regine Sitruk-Ware, Robin Maguire, Juan Carlos Montero, Narender Kumar, Ana Maria Salvatierra, Ana Sofia Tejada, Leila Cochón, María Luisa Forcelledo, Pekka Lahteenmaki, Francisco Alvarez, Anibal Faundes. (2007) Effect of a single vaginal administration of levonorgestrel in Carraguard® gel on the ovulatory process: a potential candidate for “dual protection” emergency contraception. Contraception 76:2, 111-116
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    Jonathan P. Jarow. (2007) Diagnostic Approach to the Infertile Male Patient. Endocrinology & Metabolism Clinics of North America 36:2, 297-311
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    Carlos Y. Valenzuela. (2007) Postovulatory effects of levonorgestrel in emergency contraception. Contraception 75:5, 401-402
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    Idris A. Okewole, Ayodele O. Arowojolu, Okanlawon L. Odusoga, Olufemi A. Oloyede, Olufemi A. Adeleye, Jide Salu, Olukayode A. Dada. (2007) Effect of single administration of levonorgestrel on the menstrual cycle. Contraception 75:5, 372-377
    CrossRef

  111. 111

    Rafael T. Mikolajczyk, Joseph B. Stanford. (2007) Response to letter to editor: Quantitative assessment of postovulatory effects of levonorgestrel emergency contraception. Contraception 75:5, 402-403
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    Bruno Scarpa, David B. Dunson. (2007) Bayesian methods for searching for optimal rules for timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy. Statistics in Medicine 26:9, 1920-1936
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    Richard J. Fehring, Mary Schneider, Kathleen Raviele, Mary Lee Barron. (2007) Efficacy of Cervical Mucus Observations Plus Electronic Hormonal Fertility Monitoring as a Method of Natural Family Planning. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing 36:2, 152-160
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    Irving M Spitz. (2007) Progesterone receptor antagonists and selective progesterone receptor modulators: proven and potential clinical applications. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2:2, 227-242
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    Janet E. Robinson, Jayne E. Ellis. (2007) Mistiming of intercourse as a primary cause of failure to conceive: results of a survey on use of a home-use fertility monitor. Current Medical Research and Opinion 23:2, 301-306
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    Claudia Barelli, Michael Heistermann, Christophe Boesch, Ulrich H. Reichard. (2007) Sexual swellings in wild white-handed gibbon females (Hylobates lar) indicate the probability of ovulation. Hormones and Behavior 51:2, 221-230
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    Natalia Novikova, Edith Weisberg, Frank Z. Stanczyk, Horacio B. Croxatto, Ian S. Fraser. (2007) Effectiveness of levonorgestrel emergency contraception given before or after ovulation — a pilot study. Contraception 75:2, 112-118
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    Frank Nawroth. (2007) Anwendung von Clomifen zur ovariellen Stimulation. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 5:1, 39-48
    CrossRef

  119. 119

    Martie G. Haselton, Mina Mortezaie, Elizabeth G. Pillsworth, April Bleske-Rechek, David A. Frederick. (2007) Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior 51:1, 40-45
    CrossRef

  120. 120

    Germán Rosano, Adriana M Caille, Marlene Gallardo-Ríos, María José Munuce. (2007) d-Mannose-binding sites are putative sperm determinants of human oocyte recognition and fertilization. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 15:2, 182-190
    CrossRef

  121. 121

    Kenneth L. Campbell, John C. Rockett. (2006) Biomarkers of ovulation, endometrial receptivity, fertilisation, implantation and early pregnancy progression. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 13-25
    CrossRef

  122. 122

    Courtney D. Lynch, Leila W. Jackson, Germaine M. Buck Louis. (2006) Estimation of the day-specific probabilities of conception: current state of the knowledge and the relevance for epidemiological research. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 3-12
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    Cecilia Pyper, Lise Bromhall, Sarah Dummett, Douglas G. Altman, Pat Brownbill, Michael Murphy. (2006) The Oxford Conception Study design and recruitment experience. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 51-59
    CrossRef

  124. 124

    Bruno Scarpa, David B. Dunson. (2006) Bayesian selection of predictors of conception probabilities across the menstrual cycle. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 30-37
    CrossRef

  125. 125

    Sherry G. Selevan, Joseph B. Stanford. (2006) Workshop recommendations for the preconception cohort of the National Childrens Study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 60-65
    CrossRef

  126. 126

    Rafael T. Mikolajczyk, Joseph B. Stanford. (2006) Measuring fecundity with standardised estimates of expected pregnancies. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 43-50
    CrossRef

  127. 127

    Rosalie Dominik, Pai-Lien Chen. (2006) Day-specific pregnancy probability estimation in barrier contraceptive effectiveness trials. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 38-42
    CrossRef

  128. 128

    Michael J. Zinaman. (2006) Using cervical mucus and other easily observed biomarkers to identify ovulation in prospective pregnancy trials. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 20, 26-29
    CrossRef

  129. 129

    Mitchell D. Creinin, William Schlaff, David F. Archer, Livia Wan, Ron Frezieres, Michael Thomas, Michael Rosenberg, James Higgins. (2006) Progesterone Receptor Modulator for Emergency Contraception. Obstetrics & Gynecology 108:5, 1089-1097
    CrossRef

  130. 130

    Susanne M Veltman-Verhulst, Ben J Cohlen, Edward Hughes, Maas Jan Heineman, Susanne M Veltman-Verhulst. 2006. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility. .
    CrossRef

  131. 131

    R. M. Stumpf, C. Boesch. (2006) The efficacy of female choice in chimpanzees of the Taï Forest, Côte d’Ivoire. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60:6, 749-765
    CrossRef

  132. 132

    David B. Dunson. 2006. Fertility Studies. .
    CrossRef

  133. 133

    P. Frank-Herrmann, C. Gnoth, S. Baur, T. Strowitzki. (2006) Natürliche Familienplanung. Der Gynäkologe 39:9, 671-677
    CrossRef

  134. 134

    G LEYENDECKER, G KUNZ, S KISSLER, L WILDT. (2006) Adenomyosis and reproduction. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 20:4, 523-546
    CrossRef

  135. 135

    (2006) The Biology of Human Sex Differences. New England Journal of Medicine 355:1, 98-98
    Full Text

  136. 136

    Elizabeth G. Pillsworth, Martie G. Haselton. (2006) Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior 27:4, 247-258
    CrossRef

  137. 137

    Richard J. Fehring, Mary Schneider, Kathleen Raviele. (2006) Variability in the Phases of the Menstrual Cycle. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Neonatal Nursing 35:3, 376-384
    CrossRef

  138. 138

    Michael F. G Murphy, Rachel E Neale, Kate Hey, Valerie A Seagroatt, Michael J Goldacre, Martin P Vessey, Bryony M Willis, Douglas J Ellis, David H Barlow. (2006) Pregnancy Outcome Among Twins Conceived After Subfertility Treatment Compared With Natural Twins: A Population-Based Study. Twin Research and Human Genetics 9:2, 279-284
    CrossRef

  139. 139

    Horatio B. Croxatto, Vivian Brache, Rebecca Massai, Francisco Alvarez, M.L. Forcelledo, Margarita Pavez, Leila Cochon, Ana Maria Salvatierra, Aníbal Faundes. (2006) Feasibility study of Nestorone®–ethinylestradiol vaginal contraceptive ring for emergency contraception. Contraception 73:1, 46-52
    CrossRef

  140. 140

    Horacio Croxatto. (2006) Response to letter to the editor. Contraception 73:1, 108-109
    CrossRef

  141. 141

    Lawrence J. Severy, Janet Robinson, Cynthia Findley-Klein, James McNulty. (2006) Acceptability of a home monitor used to aid in conception: psychosocial factors and couple dynamics. Contraception 73:1, 65-71
    CrossRef

  142. 142

    Chanley M. Small, Amita K. Manatunga, Mitchel Klein, Heather S. Feigelson, Celia E. Dominguez, Ruth McChesney, Michele Marcus. (2006) Menstrual Cycle Characteristics. Epidemiology 17:1, 52-60
    CrossRef

  143. 143

    R. Ecochard. (2005) Heterogeneity, the masked part of reproductive technology success rates. Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique 53, 107-117
    CrossRef

  144. 144

    Irving M. Spitz. (2005) Clinical Applications of Progesterone Receptor Antagonists and Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulators. The Endocrinologist 15:6, 391-400
    CrossRef

  145. 145

    S. W Gangestad, R. Thornhill, C. E Garver-Apgar. (2005) Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272:1576, 2023-2027
    CrossRef

  146. 146

    Karen Saboya Brito, Luis Bahamondes, Josiane A.A. Nascimento, Luciana de Santis, María José Munuce. (2005) The in vitro effect of emergency contraception doses of levonorgestrel on the acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa. Contraception 72:3, 225-228
    CrossRef

  147. 147

    Mary Lee Barron, Richard J. Fehring. (2005) Basal Body Temperature Assessment. MCN, The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing 30:5, 290-296
    CrossRef

  148. 148

    David Andrew Puts. (2005) Mating context and menstrual phase affect women's preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior 26:5, 388-397
    CrossRef

  149. 149

    Osmond J. D'Cruz, Fatih M. Uckun. (2005) Vaginal contraceptive activity of a chelated vanadocene. Contraception 72:2, 146-156
    CrossRef

  150. 150

    Clarice R. Weinberg. 2005. Conception, Models for. .
    CrossRef

  151. 151

    Timothy M. M. Farley. 2005. Reproduction. .
    CrossRef

  152. 152

    María José Munuce, Josiane A.A. Nascimento, Germán Rosano, Anibal Faúndes, Karen Saboya-Brito, Luis Bahamondes. (2005) In vitro effect of levonorgestrel on sperm fertilizing capacity and mouse embryo development. Contraception 72:1, 71-76
    CrossRef

  153. 153

    Alvaro J. Idrovo, Luz Helena Sanìn, Donald Cole, Jorge Chavarro, Heidy Cáceres, Javier Narváez, Mauricio Restrepo. (2005) Time to first pregnancy among women working in agricultural production. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 78:6, 493-500
    CrossRef

  154. 154

    Rafael T. Mikolajczyk, Joseph B. Stanford. (2005) A new method for estimating the effectiveness of emergency contraception that accounts for variation in timing of ovulation and previous cycle length. Fertility and Sterility 83:6, 1764-1770
    CrossRef

  155. 155

    C. Thöne, M. Wolff. (2005) Diagnostik und Therapie der Sterilität in der Frauenarztpraxis. Gynäkologische Endokrinologie 3:2, 115-130
    CrossRef

  156. 156

    David B. Dunson, Jamie L. Bigelow, Bernardo Colombo. (2005) Reduced Fertilization Rates in Older Men When Cervical Mucus Is Suboptimal. Obstetrics & Gynecology 105:4, 788-793
    CrossRef

  157. 157

    Ekaterina Klinkova, J. Keith Hodges, Kerstin Fuhrmann, Tom Jong, Michael Heistermann. (2005) Male Dominance Rank, Female Mate Choice and Male Mating and Reproductive Success in Captive Chimpanzees. International Journal of Primatology 26:2, 357-484
    CrossRef

  158. 158

    David B. Dunson, Joseph B. Stanford. (2005) Bayesian Inferences on Predictors of Conception Probabilities. Biometrics 61:1, 126-133
    CrossRef

  159. 159

    Marinko M. Biljan, Diane D. Tkalec, Hanane Lachgar. (2005) Absence of diurnal variation in semen parameters in normospermic men. Fertility and Sterility 83:2, 477-479
    CrossRef

  160. 160

    GERHARD LEYENDECKER, GEORG KUNZ, MARK HERBERTZ, DOLORES BEIL, PETER HUPPERT, GERHARD MALL, STEPHAN KISSLER, MARION NOE, LUDWIG WILDT. (2004) Uterine Peristaltic Activity and the Development of Endometriosis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1034:1, 338-355
    CrossRef

  161. 161

    H.B. Croxatto, V. Brache, M. Pavez, L. Cochon, M.L. Forcelledo, F. Alvarez, R. Massai, A. Faundes, A.M. Salvatierra. (2004) Pituitary–ovarian function following the standard levonorgestrel emergency contraceptive dose or a single 0.75-mg dose given on the days preceding ovulation. Contraception 70:6, 442-450
    CrossRef

  162. 162

    Arthur F. Haney. (2004) Endometrial biopsy: A test whose time has come and gone. Fertility and Sterility 82:5, 1295-1296
    CrossRef

  163. 163

    M. Bals-Pratsch. (2004) Notfallmanahmen zur Verhtung einer Schwangerschaft. Der Gynkologe 37:10, 955-958
    CrossRef

  164. 164

    (2004) Use of clomiphene citrate in women. Fertility and Sterility 82, 90-96
    CrossRef

  165. 165

    (2004) Optimal evaluation of the infertile female. Fertility and Sterility 82, 169-172
    CrossRef

  166. 166

    Gerard G. Nahum, Harold Stanislaw, Connette McMahon. (2004) Preventing ectopic pregnancies: how often does transperitoneal transmigration of sperm occur in effecting human pregnancy?. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 111:7, 706-714
    CrossRef

  167. 167

    Hulusi Bulent Zeyneloglu. (2004) Single versus double intrauterine insemination: are outcomes affected?. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 16:3, 251-256
    CrossRef

  168. 168

    Elizabeth G. Pillsworth, Martie G. Haselton, David M. Buss. (2004) Ovulatory Shifts in Female Sexual Desire. Journal of Sex Research 41:1, 55-65
    CrossRef

  169. 169

    (2004) Intraabdominal Pregnancy after Hysterectomy. New England Journal of Medicine 350:4, 417-417
    Full Text

  170. 170

    Richard J. Fehring, Kathleen Raviele, Mary Schneider. (2004) A comparison of the fertile phase as determined by the Clearplan Easy Fertility Monitor™ and self-assessment of cervical mucus. Contraception 69:1, 9-14
    CrossRef

  171. 171

    David B. Dunson, Donna D. Baird, Bernardo Colombo. (2004) Increased Infertility With Age in Men and Women. Obstetrics & Gynecology 103:1, 51-56
    CrossRef

  172. 172

    Westhoff, Carolyn, . (2003) Emergency Contraception. New England Journal of Medicine 349:19, 1830-1835
    Full Text

  173. 173

    (2003) Use of clomiphene citrate in women. Fertility and Sterility 80:5, 1302-1308
    CrossRef

  174. 174

    Irving M Spitz. (2003) Progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 12:10, 1693-1707
    CrossRef

  175. 175

    Candace Tingen, Joseph B. Stanford, David B. Dunson. (2003) Methodologic and Statistical Approaches to Studying Human Fertility and Environmental Exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives 112:1, 87-93
    CrossRef

  176. 176

    Audrey Brown, Alistair Williams, Sharon Cameron, Susan Morrow, David T Baird. (2003) A single dose of mifepristone (200 mg) in the immediate preovulatory phase offers contraceptive potential without cycle disruption. Contraception 68:3, 203-209
    CrossRef

  177. 177

    Tobias Deschner, Michael Heistermann, Keith Hodges, Christophe Boesch. (2003) Timing and probability of ovulation in relation to sex skin swelling in wild West African chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus. Animal Behaviour 66:3, 551-560
    CrossRef

  178. 178

    James Trussell, Charlotte Ellertson, Helena von Hertzen, Allison Bigrigg, Anne Webb, Margaret Evans, Sue Ferden, Clare Leadbetter. (2003) Estimating the effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills. Contraception 67:4, 259-265
    CrossRef

  179. 179

    Horacio B Croxatto. (2003) Response to letter from Rafael T. Mikolajczyk and Joseph B. Stanford. Contraception 67:4, 335-337
    CrossRef

  180. 180

    Osmond J. D’Cruz, Fatih M. Uckun. (2003) Contraceptive activity of a spermicidal aryl phosphate derivative of bromo-methoxy-zidovudine (compound WHI-07) in rabbits. Fertility and Sterility 79:4, 864-872
    CrossRef

  181. 181

    Jonathan A. Gottschall, Tiffani A. Gottschall. (2003) Are per-incident rape-pregnancy rates higher than per-incident consensual pregnancy rates?. Human Nature 14:1, 1-20
    CrossRef

  182. 182

    James Trussell, Charlotte Ellertson, Laneta Dorflinger. (2003) Effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception by cycle day of intercourse: implications for mechanism of action. Contraception 67:3, 167-171
    CrossRef

  183. 183

    David B Dunson, Bernardo Colombo. (2003) Bayesian Modeling of Markers of Day-Specific Fertility. Journal of the American Statistical Association 98:461, 28-37
    CrossRef

  184. 184

    Oliver C Schultheiss, Anja Dargel, Wolfgang Rohde. (2003) Implicit motives and gonadal steroid hormones: effects of menstrual cycle phase, oral contraceptive use, and relationship status. Hormones and Behavior 43:2, 293-301
    CrossRef

  185. 185

    Terri L Walsh, Ron G Frezieres, Karen Peacock, Anita L Nelson, Virginia A Clark, Leslie Bernstein, Brian G.D Wraxall. (2003) Use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to measure semen exposure resulting from male condom failures: implications for contraceptive efficacy and the prevention of sexually transmitted disease. Contraception 67:2, 139-150
    CrossRef

  186. 186

    David B. Dunson. (2003) Incorporating heterogeneous intercourse records into time to pregnancy models. Mathematical Population Studies 10:2, 127-143
    CrossRef

  187. 187

    Randy Thornhill, Steven Gangestad. (2003) Evolutionary Theory Led to Evidence for a Male Sex Pheromone That Signals Symmetry. Psychological Inquiry 14:3, 318-325
    CrossRef

  188. 188

    Richard J Fehring. (2002) Accuracy of the peak day of cervical mucus as a biological marker of fertility. Contraception 66:4, 231-235
    CrossRef

  189. 189

    Marcos Arévalo, Victoria Jennings, Irit Sinai. (2002) Efficacy of a new method of family planning: the Standard Days Method. Contraception 65:5, 333-338
    CrossRef

  190. 190

    WILLARD CATES, MARKUS J. STEINER. (2002) Dual Protection Against Unintended Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infections. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 29:3, 168-174
    CrossRef

  191. 191

    H.B Croxatto, B Fuentealba, V Brache, A.M Salvatierra, F Alvarez, R Massai, L Cochon, A Faundes. (2002) Effects of the Yuzpe regimen, given during the follicular phase, on ovarian function. Contraception 65:2, 121-128
    CrossRef

  192. 192

    Melissa Sanders Wanner, Rachel L. Couchenour. (2002) Hormonal Emergency Contraception. Pharmacotherapy 22:1, 43-53
    CrossRef

  193. 193

    Horacio B Croxatto. (2002) Physiology of gamete and embryo transport through the Fallopian tube. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 4:2, 160-169
    CrossRef

  194. 194

    David B. Dunson. (2001) Bayesian Modeling of the Level and Duration of Fertility in the Menstrual Cycle. Biometrics 57:4, 1067-1073
    CrossRef

  195. 195

    Marta Durand, Ma del Carmen Cravioto, Elizabeth G Raymond, Ofelia Durán-Sánchez, Ma De la Luz Cruz-Hinojosa, Andrés Castell-Rodrı́guez, Raffaela Schiavon, Fernando Larrea. (2001) On the mechanisms of action of short-term levonorgestrel administration in emergency contraception. Contraception 64:4, 227-234
    CrossRef

  196. 196

    Erik Mandelin, Hannu Koistinen, Riitta Koistinen, Johanna Arola, Biran Affandi, Markku Seppälä. (2001) Endometrial expression of glycodelin in women with levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal implants. Fertility and Sterility 76:3, 474-478
    CrossRef

  197. 197

    Rene Ecochard, Hans Boehringer, Muriel Rabilloud, Henri Marret. (2001) Chronological aspects of ultrasonic, hormonal, and other indirect indices of ovulation. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 108:8, 822-829
    CrossRef

  198. 198

    Erin Gainer, Christian Méry, André Ulmann. (2001) Levonorgestrel-only emergency contraception: real-world tolerance and efficacy. Contraception 64:1, 17-21
    CrossRef

  199. 199

    Q. Van Dyk, M. C. Mahony, G. D. Hodgen. (2001) Differential binding of X- and Y-chromosome-bearing human spermatozoa to zona pellucida in vitro. Andrologia 33:4, 199-205
    CrossRef

  200. 200

    J. P. T. Rhemrev, J. P. W. Vermeiden, G. R. M. M. Haenen, J. J. de Bruijne, L. T. M. Rekers-Mombarg, A. Bast. (2001) Progressively motile human spermatozoa are well protected against in vitro lipid peroxidation imposed by induced oxidative stress. Andrologia 33:3, 151-158
    CrossRef

  201. 201

    Allen J. Wilcox, David B. Dunson, Clarice R. Weinberg, James Trussell, Donna Day Baird. (2001) Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception 63:4, 211-215
    CrossRef

  202. 202

    M.J. Steiner, D.J. Taylor, P.J. Feldblum, A.J. Wheeless. (2000) How well do male latex condoms work? Pregnancy outcome during one menstrual cycle of use. Contraception 62:6, 315-319
    CrossRef

  203. 203

    A SPITZ, E KIM, L LIPSHULTZ. (2000) CONTEMPORARY APPROACH TO THE MALE INFERTILITY EVALUATION. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 27:3, 487-516
    CrossRef

  204. 204

    R Ecochard. (2000) Chronological aspects of ultrasonic, hormonal, and other indirect indices of ovulation. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 108:8, 822-829
    CrossRef

  205. 205

    M JOFFE. (2000) Time trends in biological fertility in Britain. The Lancet 355:9219, 1961-1965
    CrossRef

  206. 206

    Pak Chung Ho. (2000) Emergency contraception: methods and efficacy. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 12:3, 175-179
    CrossRef

  207. 207

    David B. Dunson, Clarice R. Weinberg. (2000) Accounting for unreported and missing intercourse in human fertility studies. Statistics in Medicine 19:5, 665-679
    CrossRef

  208. 208

    David B. Dunson, Clarice R. Weinberg. (2000) Modeling Human Fertility in the Presence of Measurement Error. Biometrics 56:1, 288-292
    CrossRef

  209. 209

    N.M. Soede, A.K. Nissen, B. Kemp. (2000) Timing of insemination relative to ovulation in pigs: Effects on sex ratio of offspring. Theriogenology 53:4, 1003-1011
    CrossRef

  210. 210

    Takuya Kura, Yasuhiro Nakashima. (2000) CONDITIONS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF SOLDIER SPERM CLASSES. Evolution 54:1, 72
    CrossRef

  211. 211

    Patrick Royston, Alberto Ferreira. (1999) A New Approach to Modeling Daily Probabilities of Conception. Biometrics 55:4, 1005-1013
    CrossRef

  212. 212

    Juan J Espinós, José Rodrı́guez-Espinosa, Raquel Senosiain, Monica Aura, Cristina Vanrell, Meritxell Gispert, Carmen Vega, Joaquim Calaf. (1999) The role of matching menstrual data with hormonal measurements in evaluating effectiveness of postcoital contraception. Contraception 60:4, 243-247
    CrossRef

  213. 213

    Irit Sinai, Victoria Jennings, Marcos Arévalo. (1999) The twoday algorithm: a new algorithm to identify the fertile time of the menstrual cycle. Contraception 60:2, 65-70
    CrossRef

  214. 214

    OCHSENKUHN, KAMISCHKE, NIESCHLAG. (1999) Imipramine for successful treatment of retrograde ejaculation caused by retroperitoneal surgery. International Journal of Andrology 22:3, 173-177
    CrossRef

  215. 215

    Vivian Brache, Paul D Blumenthal, Francisco Alvarez, Thomas R Dunson, Leila Cochon, Anibal Faundes. (1999) Timing of onset of contraceptive effectiveness in Norplant® implant users II. Contraception 59:4, 245-251
    CrossRef

  216. 216

    Marianne C Burkhart, Lidia de Mazariegos, Sandra Salazar, Tea Hess. (1999) Incidence of irregular cycles among Mayan women who reported having regular cycles: implications for fertility awareness methods. Contraception 59:4, 271-275
    CrossRef

  217. 217

    James Trussell, Germán Rodrı́guez, Charlotte Ellertson. (1999) Updated estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. Contraception 59:3, 147-151
    CrossRef

  218. 218

    Henrik A. Kolstad, Jens Peter Bonde, Niels H. Hjøllund, Tina K. Jensen, Tine B. Henriksen, Erik Ernst, Aleksander Giwercman, Niels Erik Skakkebæk, Jørn Olsen. (1999) Menstrual cycle pattern and fertility: a prospective follow-up study of pregnancy and early embryonal loss in 295 couples who were planning their first pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility 71:3, 490-496
    CrossRef

  219. 219

    Haibo Zhou, Clarice R. Weinberg. (1999) Potential for bias in estimating human fecundability parameters: a comparison of statistical models. Statistics in Medicine 18:4, 411-422
    CrossRef

  220. 220

    (1999) Comparison of three single doses of mifepristone as emergency contraception: a randomised trial. The Lancet 353:9154, 697-702
    CrossRef

  221. 221

    te Velde, Egbert R., Cohlen, Bernard J., . (1999) The Management of Infertility. New England Journal of Medicine 340:3, 224-226
    Full Text

  222. 222

    SHAKUNTALA KOTHARI. (1999) Prevention and Medical Management of Unwanted Pregnancy: The Physician's Role. Journal of Women's Health 8:1, 59-64
    CrossRef

  223. 223

    Markus J. Steiner, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Kenneth F. Schulz, Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar, Brenda B. Earle, James Trussell. (1998) Measuring true contraceptive efficacy. Contraception 58:6, 375-378
    CrossRef

  224. 224

    Carlos A Petta, Anibal Faúndes, Thomas R Dunson, Marcia Ramos, Mara DeLucio, Daniel Faúndes, Luis Bahamondes. (1998) Timing of onset of contraceptive effectiveness in Depo-Provera users. II. Effects on ovarian functionDepo-Provera, Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, Michigan.. Fertility and Sterility 70:5, 817-820
    CrossRef

  225. 225

    Lena Marions, Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, Marja-Liisa Swahn, Marc Bygdeman. (1998) Contraceptive efficacy of low doses of mifepristone. Fertility and Sterility 70:5, 813-816
    CrossRef

  226. 226

    Didi DM Braat, Jesper MJ Smeenk, Arentje P Manger, Chris MG Thomas, Sebastiaan Veersema, Johannes MWM Merkus. (1998) Saliva test as ovulation predictor. The Lancet 352:9136, 1283-1284
    CrossRef

  227. 227

    (1998) Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. The Lancet 352:9126, 428-433
    CrossRef

  228. 228

    Philip E. Castle, Timothy E. Hoen, Kevin J. Whaley, Richard A. Cone. (1998) Contraceptive testing of vaginal agents in rabbits. Contraception 58:1, 51-60
    CrossRef

  229. 229

    James Trussell, Germán Rodrı́guez, Charlotte Ellertson. (1998) New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception. Contraception 57:6, 363-369
    CrossRef

  230. 230

    Jens Peter E Bonde, Niels Henrik I Hjollund, Tina Kold Jensen, Erik Ernst, Henrik Kolstad, Tine Brink Henriksen, Aleksander Giwercman, Niels Erik Skakkebæk, Anna-Maria Andersson, Jørn Olsen. (1998) A follow-up study of environmental and biologic determinants of fertility among 430 danish first-pregnancy planners: Design and methods. Reproductive Toxicology 12:1, 19-27
    CrossRef

  231. 231

    Leonard F. Blackwell, James B. Brown, Delwyn Cooke. (1998) Definition of the potentially fertile period from urinary steroid excretion rates. Part II. A threshold value for pregnanediol glucuronide as a marker for the end of the potentially fertile period in the human menstrual cycle. Steroids 63:1, 5-13
    CrossRef

  232. 232

    Wood, Alastair J.J., , Glasier, Anna, . (1997) Emergency Postcoital Contraception. New England Journal of Medicine 337:15, 1058-1064
    Full Text

  233. 233

    Benjamin E. Reubinoff, Joseph G. Schenker. (1997) Reply of the authors. Fertility and Sterility 68:2, 380-381
    CrossRef

  234. 234

    Thomas J. Gill. (1997) Genetic Factors in Reproduction and Their Evolutionary Significance. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 37:1, 7-16
    CrossRef

  235. 235

    Eduardo E. Castilla, Joe Leigh Simpson, John T. Queenan. (1996) Down syndrome and natural family planning. American Journal of Medical Genetics 66:3, 366-366
    CrossRef

  236. 236

    Virginia M. Lamprecht, Laurence Grummer-Strawn. (1996) Development of new formulas to identify the fertile time of the menstrual cycle. Contraception 54:6, 339-343
    CrossRef

  237. 237

    (1996) Pregnancy and the Timing of Intercourse. New England Journal of Medicine 334:19, 1266-1268
    Full Text

  238. 238

    Simpson, Joe Leigh, . (1995) Pregnancy and the Timing of Intercourse. New England Journal of Medicine 333:23, 1563-1565
    Full Text

Letters