Join the 200th Anniversary Celebration

Original Article

Discontinuation of Antihyperlipidemic Drugs — Do Rates Reported in Clinical Trials Reflect Rates in Primary Care Settings?

Susan E. Andrade, Sc.D., Alexander M. Walker, M.D., Dr.P.H., Lawrence K. Gottlieb, M.D., M.P.P., Norman K. Hollenberg, M.D., Ph.D., Marcia A. Testa, M.P.H., Ph.D., Gordon M. Saperia, M.D., and Richard Platt, M.D.

N Engl J Med 1995; 332:1125-1131April 27, 1995

Abstract

Background

Discontinuation rates for drugs used to treat chronic conditions may affect the success of therapy. However, the discontinuation rates reported in clinical trials may not reflect those in primary care settings.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study using computerized research files and medical records on 2369 new users of antihyperlipidemic therapy at two health maintenance organizations (HMOs) from 1988 through 1990. The rates of drug discontinuation in these primary care settings were compared with the rates reported in clinical trials published from 1975 through 1993, located with the Medline data base.

Results

In the HMOs, the one-year probability of drug discontinuation was 41 percent for bile acid sequestrants (95 percent confidence interval, 38 to 44 percent), 46 percent for niacin (95 percent confidence interval, 42 to 51 percent), 15 percent for lovastatin (95 percent confidence interval, 11 to 19 percent), and 37 percent for gemfibrozil (95 percent confidence interval, 31 to 43 percent). For the bile acid sequestrants, niacin, and gemfibrozil, the risks of discontinuation were substantially higher in the HMOs than in randomized clinical trials, in which the summary estimates of this risk were 31 percent, 4 percent, and 15 percent, respectively, for trials of one year or longer. The rates of discontinuation in open-label studies were similar to those in the HMOs.

Conclusions

The discontinuation rates reported in randomized clinical trials may not reflect the rates actually observed in primary care settings. The effectiveness and tolerability of antihyperlipidemic medications should be studied further in populations that typically use the agents.

Media in This Article

Figure 2Risks of Drug Discontinuation over Periods of One Year or More as Reported in Randomized Clinical Trials and in the Two HMOs Studied.
Figure 1Cumulative Incidence of Drug Discontinuation in the Patients from the Two HMOs, According to Causeof Discontinuation.
Article

Five large-scale, randomized clinical trials of antihyperlipidemic drugs1-5 have suggested that most patients continue receiving the agents for long periods of time. Reported rates of discontinuation or dropping out range from approximately 4 percent1 to 15 percent2,3 in the first year of antihyperlipidemic treatment and from approximately 11 percent1 to 30 percent2,4,5 with five or more years of follow-up.

In clinical trials, the services made available to patients to manage drug side effects and improve compliance are usually more extensive than those provided in routine clinical practice. Selection criteria intended to provide a clear therapeutic contrast may produce study groups that tolerate drug therapy better than typical populations of patients. Four of the aforementioned trials1,2,4,5 enrolled only middle-aged men, and each excluded patients with diseases or conditions that are common in populations requiring antihyperlipidemic therapy. These included coronary heart disease,2,4,5 diabetes mellitus requiring treatment with insulin1-5 or oral hypoglycemic agents,3-5 hypertension,4,5 and notable obesity.4 Subjects unlikely to have good compliance1,4 were also excluded.

Because lifelong treatment is generally necessary in persons with high lipid levels, the discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic drugs signals a failure of therapy due to the patient's intolerance or to therapeutic ineffectiveness. To obtain more representative estimates of the rate of discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic drugs in primary care settings, we evaluated the risks of discontinuation in patients enrolled in two health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and compared them with discontinuation rates for the same drugs reported in long-term clinical trials.

Methods

Cohort Study

A retrospective cohort study (unpublished data) was performed with the computerized files and full-text medical records of the Fallon Community Health Plan (FCHP) and the Harvard Community Health Plan (HCHP), two HMOs operating in central and eastern Massachusetts. The study population consisted of all FCHP members with a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia (codes 272.00 to 272.90 of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 1990, and all HCHP members with diagnosed lipid disorders (Computer-Stored Ambulatory Record code B001, B003, B005, B006, B160, or S122 or laboratory evidence of a lipid abnormality) from October 1, 1988, through September 30, 1990, who began antihyperlipidemic therapy with the bile acid sequestrants cholestyramine and colestipol or with niacin, lovastatin, gemfibrozil, probucol, dextrothyroxine, or clofibrate and who had prescription-drug coverage throughout the study period. For all eligible study subjects, data on sex, date of birth, concomitant drug use, concomitant diagnoses, dosage of any antihyperlipidemic drugs, serum lipid levels (HCHP members only), and referral to the Lipid Clinic (FCHP members only) were acquired through the computerized data bases of the two HMOs.

Potential discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic therapy was flagged by identifying patients who switched from one antihyperlipidemic agent to another during the study period, patients for whom more than six months elapsed between the last refill of a prescription for an antihyperlipidemic drug and the end of the study period or the termination of participation in the plan, and patients for whom omitted or inactive antihyperlipidemic therapies were flagged in the clinical-encounter files (HCHP members only). For each patient so identified, additional information on the discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic therapy and the reason for it was obtained by reviewing the medical chart. Drug courses that were discontinued by the physician because the patient had acceptable serum cholesterol levels or that were stopped temporarily were not considered to constitute discontinuations for the purposes of the primary analyses. For each drug and for all drug therapies combined, curves were constructed by the product-limit method6 to show the cumulative incidence (or risk) of drug discontinuation, drug discontinuation due to adverse effects, and drug discontinuation due to therapeutic ineffectiveness during a particular period. The rates of discontinuation of clofibrate, dextrothyroxine, probucol, and specific combinations of two or more agents are not reported but are included in the overall estimate.

Reported Long-Term Clinical Trials

We used the Medline data base to locate all primary reports of clinical trials published in English from January 1975 through December 1993 that examined the efficacy or safety of cholestyramine, colestipol, niacin, lovastatin, or gemfibrozil in treating lipid disorders or preventing morbidity or mortality from coronary heart disease in adults. We excluded studies that had lasted less than six months, that had enrolled fewer than 30 patients in the treatment group of interest, or that included ambiguous information on the number of subjects enrolled or dropping out. We used the overall reported dropout rates, which included but were not limited to discontinuations due to adverse effects and therapeutic ineffectiveness. We excluded subjects who did not meet the eligibility criteria for the study7,8 and those who were given substandard formulations of the agents.8 When more than one dosage or formulation was assessed, we chose the mean rate of discontinuation. We used the reported rate of discontinuation for the entire study population, including other treatment groups, when the investigators did not report regimen-specific discontinuation rates but did indicate that there was no significant difference in rates between the groups.9,10

We also obtained published open-label drug studies that met the same criteria as the clinical trials. For the purposes of our analysis, reported deaths were not considered to be discontinuations. Asymptotic 95 percent confidence intervals for the risks of discontinuation were calculated from the reported standard errors or from the raw counts, where available.

To estimate summary values, we summed the logit of the risk of discontinuation (log[R/(1-R)]) for each study, weighted by the inverse variance [R(1-R)/SE]2, where R is the reported rate of discontinuation and SE the standard error. The variance of the weighted sum was taken as the inverse of the sum of the weights. Overall estimates of the rate of discontinuation were then recalculated from the logit values.

Results

Cohort Study

There were 2369 eligible study subjects, including 1309 FCHP members and 1060 HCHP members. The mean age of the FCHP members was 58 years, and 55 percent were female. The mean age of the HCHP members was 55 years, and 48 percent were female. In all, these patients were exposed to 3223 courses of therapy. The characteristics of the patients, including concomitant diagnoses and drug use, are shown in Table 1Table 1Characteristics of the HMO Patients Who Were Receiving Antihyperlipidemic Therapy during the Study Period..

Data on the frequency with which antihyperlipidemic drugs were discontinued in the HMOs are presented in Table 2Table 2Courses of Antihyperlipidemic Therapy Discontinued during the Study Period in the Patients from the Two HMOs, According to the Reasons for Discontinuation. according to the type of drug and the reason for discontinuation. Of the 3223 courses of antihyperlipidemic treatment, a total of 1047 courses (32 percent) were discontinued. An additional 38 courses of treatment (1 percent) were stopped temporarily because of hospitalizations or transient side effects.

Among the 1047 discontinued courses of therapy, 582 (56 percent) were followed by a switch to a new therapy, 120 (11 percent) by treatment with agents in addition to the one originally prescribed, 27 (3 percent) by treatment with one agent of a combination originally prescribed, and 318 (30 percent) by no further drug therapy during the study period. The median time from the start of observation to the discontinuation of therapy or the completion of the observation period was 190 days (range, 1 to 1093).

The principal reasons for the discontinuation of drug therapy were adverse effects (in 18 percent of all courses given), therapeutic ineffectiveness (in 10 percent), and noncompliance (in 2 percent). Other reasons, from the perspective of the patient, included a lack of desire to continue receiving the medication (often due to a preference for nonpharmacologic methods of lowering cholesterol levels or anxiety about potential side effects of the drug), hospitalization, and concomitant serious illness. In 78 cases, more than one reason was listed for discontinuing the drug.

Adverse effects were noted as a contributing factor in 587 of the 1047 discontinued courses of drugs (56 percent), and therapeutic ineffectiveness was noted in 324 such courses (31 percent). These contributing causes were present in similar proportions at the two study sites.

The frequency of drug discontinuation due to adverse effects ranged from 7 percent in patients receiving lovastatin to 26 percent in patients receiving niacin. The frequency of discontinuation due to therapeutic ineffectiveness ranged from 2 percent with lovastatin to 15 percent with gemfibrozil. For both adverse effects and therapeutic ineffectiveness, the proportional number of discontinuations differed significantly (P<0.001) according to the agent received. Among discontinuations with known causes, the relative contribution of adverse effects as a documented cause was 67 percent with the bile acid sequestrants (280 of 420), 63 percent with niacin (192 of 304), 65 percent with lovastatin (35 of 54), and 40 percent with gemfibrozil (46 of 115). The relative contribution of therapeutic ineffectiveness as a documented cause of drug discontinuation was 28 percent with the bile acid sequestrants (116 of 420), 34 percent with niacin (102 of 304), 24 percent with lovastatin (13 of 54), and 58 percent with gemfibrozil (67 of 115). The overall differences between types of drugs were apparent at both study sites.

The cumulative incidence of discontinuation associated with each antihyperlipidemic drug at the HMOs is shown in Figure 1Figure 1Cumulative Incidence of Drug Discontinuation in the Patients from the Two HMOs, According to Causeof Discontinuation., both overall and according to cause. For all treatments combined, the cumulative incidence of discontinuation after one year was 38 percent. The estimated one-year risk of discontinuation was similar for all the drugs except lovastatin: it was 41 percent for the bile acid sequestrants (95 percent confidence interval, 38 to 44 percent), 46 percent for niacin (95 percent confidence interval, 42 to 51 percent), 15 percent for lovastatin (95 percent confidence interval, 11 to 19 percent), and 37 percent for gemfibrozil (95 percent confidence interval, 31 to 43 percent). The cause-specific risks of discontinuation for the various drugs were proportionate to the overall risks, with adverse effects as the predominant cause except in the case of gemfibrozil, for which the principal reason for discontinuation was therapeutic failure.

Rates of Drug Discontinuation in Long-Term Clinical Trials

We examined 30 long-term clinical trials1-4,7-31 that evaluated the safety or efficacy of antihyperlipidemic agents. These trials ranged in length from six months to seven years; there were 17 randomized trials1-4,7,9,10,12-15,17,18,26-28,30 and 13 open-label studies.8,11,14,16,19-25,29,31 Table 3Table 3Long-Term Randomized Clinical Trials of Antihyperlipidemic Agents. and Table 4Table 4Long-Term Open-Label Trials of Antihyperlipidemic Agents. list the principal findings of the randomized clinical trials and open-label trials, respectively, and show estimates of the frequency of discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic therapy as compared with our findings in the two HMOs.

Figure 2Figure 2Risks of Drug Discontinuation over Periods of One Year or More as Reported in Randomized Clinical Trials and in the Two HMOs Studied. shows the risk estimates for the discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic drugs reported in randomized clinical trials of one year or more as compared with the risks in the HMOs after one year and (where appropriate) two years. The reported estimates of the discontinuation rates in the six trials of bile acid sequestrants4,9,13,14,27,30 and one of the lovastatin trials12 were calculated for periods in excess of 1 year (range, 36 months to 7 years). The life-table estimates of the failure rate for the bile acid sequestrants, niacin, and gemfibrozil all differed significantly between the HMOs. However, the differences between the two HMOs in estimated one-year discontinuation rates were relatively minor and were less substantial than the discrepancies in rates between the HMOs and the published clinical trials.

Each agent studied except lovastatin was discontinued at higher rates in the HMOs than in randomized clinical trials over similar periods. The summary estimates of discontinuation rates for randomized trials of one year or more were as follows: 31 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 30 to 33 percent) for the bile acid sequestrants, 4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 3 to 5 percent) for niacin, 16 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 15 to 17 percent) for lovastatin, and 15 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 13 to 16 percent) for gemfibrozil. The estimated rates in the open-label studies were similar to the rates observed in the HMOs.

Discussion

The risk of discontinuing antihyperlipidemic drugs in the two HMOs one year after the start of therapy ranged from 15 percent for lovastatin to 46 percent for niacin. For the bile acid sequestrants, gemfibrozil, and niacin, the risks observed in the HMOs were substantially higher than the summary estimates of discontinuation rates reported in randomized clinical trials, which ranged from 4 percent with niacin to 31 percent with the bile acid sequestrants. Substantial heterogeneity was found among the estimates of the discontinuation rates reported in the trials, but those reported in each randomized trial of bile acid sequestrants, niacin, or gemfibrozil were lower than the corresponding rates in the HMOs for comparable periods. Similarly, Thurmer et al.32 reported a marked difference in effectiveness between antihypertensive therapy in primary care settings and the benefits reported in randomized clinical trials.

Although this study evaluated discontinuations of drug therapy that were initiated by the patient or the physician and did not specifically assess overall adherence to a regimen of medication, the estimated discontinuation rates are similar to the 23 to 50 percent frequencies of noncompliance in studies of therapy for hypertension and other chronic diseases.33-36 Long-term clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs have reported discontinuation rates of approximately 30 percent,37,38 and community-based studies with one or more years of follow-up have reported dropout rates of approximately 50 percent from antihypertensive care in private practice39 and clinic40,41 settings.

The open-label studies we examined reported discontinuation rates similar to those obtained from the HMOs. Thus, although open-label studies are generally considered inferior to randomized trials in the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, such studies may reflect the success of therapy in primary care settings more accurately when drug discontinuation is taken as the measure of drug failure. Whether this is the result of less stringent patient care or of differences in the study populations is uncertain.

Unlike previous studies that reported high frequencies of discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic drugs in primary care settings,42-44 our study used survival analysis to account for varying lengths of follow-up. In this manner, we were able to include all the observations, regardless of the length of follow-up, and to estimate the risk of drug discontinuation according to the duration of therapy. We also used this approach to assess specific causes of drug discontinuation, counting courses of drugs as censored that were terminated for reasons other than those used in the study. Our review of the medical records suggested that the reasons for discontinuation were often mixed, even when a predominant reason was cited. The adverse effects of a drug and its ineffectiveness may not be independent factors in causing the discontinuation of the drug, and our analyses of the reasons for discontinuation are presented to permit examination of the balance among specific reasons, without our suggesting a relation of cause and effect.

Data from clinical trials on intolerance to drugs and on therapeutic failures are likely to be more accurate than the information we could obtain from records of clinical practice. In clinical trials, information on drug discontinuation was collected prospectively, and more complete ascertainment was possible. In our cohort study, the use of the computerized files of the HMOs to identify possible drug discontinuations may have led to an underascertainment of the actual discontinuations. Reviewing the medical charts for a random sample of antihyperlipidemic treatments for which the computerized files showed no evidence of a drug discontinuation revealed that according to the charts, 7 percent of the treatments had been discontinued (unpublished data). Thus, among the approximately 1300 additional patients with no evidence of drug discontinuation for whom a medical chart was not reviewed, additional drug discontinuations were likely to have been missed. In addition, we excluded approximately 100 patients from the study who were initially flagged by the computer as having potentially discontinued antihyperlipidemic drug use; in these cases, the medical chart did not show adequate documentation of such use (unpublished data). All these sources of error would tend to reduce the apparent distinction between clinical trials and HMO practice, making our findings of substantial differences all the more striking.

Antihyperlipidemic agents are generally distributed without cost to patients in clinical trials. This factor was not, however, markedly different from the situation in the HMOs we studied. All HMO members included in the cohort study had insurance coverage for prescription drugs and paid only a nominal copayment for each prescription.

We also explored the influence of other characteristics of the study populations on the rates of discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic drugs in order to determine plausible factors contributing to the marked disparity in rates between the HMOs and the randomized trials. In the HMOs, the discontinuation rate was 33 percent higher among women than among men, a difference entirely explained by the fact that the rate of discontinuation due to the incidence of adverse effects was 79 percent higher among women. Age had no consistent influence on drug discontinuation. However, patients who had previously discontinued therapy with an antihyperlipidemic drug were more likely to discontinue subsequent therapy. In the long-term randomized clinical trials of lovastatin, the selection criteria were less stringent. Women were enrolled, as well as patients with various disease states and concomitant use of nonstudy drugs, and the discontinuation rates estimated in these trials were similar to those in the HMO populations.

Bias in patterns of prescribing the lipid-lowering drugs was likely to be present in this cohort study, but such bias would not discount the observed differences in rates between the randomized trials and the primary care settings. However, this bias prevents legitimate comparison of the agents within the HMO settings with respect to safety and effectiveness. As has been noted, users of secondary agents at the HMOs were more likely to discontinue therapy. However, patients in whom all other available agents had failed might be more likely to continue receiving suboptimal therapy.

The high frequency of discontinuation of antihyperlipidemic drugs due to adverse effects and therapeutic ineffectiveness in our HMO population suggests that the discontinuation rates reported in randomized clinical trials may not give an accurate reflection of the tolerability or effectiveness of therapy in the general population. Whereas randomized clinical trials are often regarded as the gold standard in the assessment of drug efficacy, they may provide inferior information with regard to certain outcomes. Reports from such trials may imply that antihyperlipidemic agents have an overly optimistic success rate, thereby distorting the judgment of both practicing physicians and the policy makers who assess the cost effectiveness of these drugs. Evaluations of cholesterol-lowering therapy have reported that early drug discontinuation has a substantial influence on the cost of treatment.45,46 Our findings suggest a need for further study of the effectiveness and tolerability of these agents.

Supported in part by the Harvard Pharmacoepidemiology Teaching and Research Fund (with donations from Berlex Laboratories, Boehringer–Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the Ciba–Geigy Corporation, Hoffmann–LaRoche, ICI Pharmaceuticals Group, Eli Lilly, the Merck Foundation, and Pfizer), by a National Research Service Award (ST32 ES07067) from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (to Dr. Andrade), by a grant (5 R01 HS07767-02) from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (to Dr. Testa), and by a grant from the Harvard Community Health Plan Foundation (to Dr. Gottlieb).

We are indebted to Barbara Lewis, Ph.D., Jan Guilbert, R.N., Maria Wennerberg, R.N., and Robert Astrella of the Fallon Clinic and to Emily Cain and James Livingston of HCHP and Channing Laboratory for their assistance in the technical aspects of data collection at the two HMOs.

Source Information

From the Departments of Epidemiology (S.E.A., A.M.W.) and Biostatistics (M.A.T.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston; Clinical Quality Management, Harvard Community Health Plan, Brookline, Mass. (L.K.G.); the Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (N.K.H.); the Division of Cardiology, Fallon Clinic, Worcester, Mass. (G.M.S.); the Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Community Health Plan, and Channing Laboratory and the Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (R.P.). Presented in part at the 10th International Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology, Stockholm, Sweden, August 30, 1994.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Walker at the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115.

References

References

  1. 1

    Clofibrate and niacin in coronary heart diseaseJAMA 1975;231:360-381
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  2. 2

    Frick MH, Elo O, Haapa K, et al. Helsinki Heart Study: primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1237-1245
    Full Text | Web of Science | Medline

  3. 3

    Bradford RH, Shear CL, Chremos AN, et al. Expanded Clinical Evaluation of Lovastatin (EXCEL) study results. I. Efficacy in modifying plasma lipoproteins and adverse event profile in 8245 patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:43-49
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  4. 4

    The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results. I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. JAMA 1984;251:351-364
    CrossRef | Web of Science

  5. 5

    The Committee of Principal Investigators. A co-operative trial in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease using clofibrate. Br Heart J 1978;40:1069-1118
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  6. 6

    Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: John Wiley, 1980.

  7. 7

    Betteridge DJ, Bhatnager D, Bing RF, et al. Treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia: United Kingdom lipid clinics study of pravastatin and cholestyramine. BMJ 1992;304:1335-1338
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  8. 8

    Gotto AM Jr, Breen WJ, Corder CN, et al. Once-daily, extended-release gemfibrozil in patients with dyslipidemia: the Lopid SR Work Group I. Am J Cardiol 1993;71:1057-1063
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  9. 9

    Dorr AE, Gundersen K, Schneider JC Jr, Spencer TW, Martin WB. Colestipol hydrochloride in hypercholesterolemic patients -- effect on serum cholesterol and mortality. J Chronic Dis 1978;31:5-14
    CrossRef | Medline

  10. 10

    Farmer JA, Washington LC, Jones PH, Shapiro DR, Gotto AM Jr, Mantell G. Comparative effects of simvastatin and lovastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the Simvastatin and Lovastatin Multicenter Study Participants. Clin Ther 1992;14:708-717
    Web of Science | Medline

  11. 11

    Bates MC, Warren SG, Grubb S, Chillag S. Effectiveness of low-dose lovastatin in lowering serum cholesterol: experience with 56 patients. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1947-1950
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  12. 12

    Blankenhorn DH, Azen SP, Kramsch DM, et al. Coronary angiographic changes with lovastatin therapy: the Monitored Atherosclerosis Regression Study (MARS). Ann Intern Med 1993;119:969-976
    Web of Science | Medline

  13. 13

    Brensike JF, Levy RI, Kelsey SF, et al. Effects of therapy with cholestyramine on progression of coronary arteriosclerosis: results of the NHLBI Type II Coronary Intervention Study. Circulation 1984;69:313-324
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  14. 14

    Cooper EE, Michel AM. Colestipol hydrochloride, a new hypolipidemic drug: a two-year study. South Med J 1975;68:303-309
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  15. 15

    Crepaldi G, Baggio G, Arca M, et al. Pravastatin vs gemfibrozil in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia: the Italian Multicenter Pravastatin Study I. Arch Intern Med 1991;151:146-152
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  16. 16

    Eisalo A, Manninen V. A long-term trial of gemfibrozil in the treatment of hyperlipidaemias. Proc R Soc Med 1976;69:Suppl 2:49-52
    Medline

  17. 17

    Frick MH, Heinonen OP, Huttunen JK, Koskinen P, Manttari M, Manninen V. Efficacy of gemfibrozil in dyslipidaemic subjects with suspected heart disease: an ancillary study in the Helsinki Heart Study frame population. Ann Med 1993;25:41-45
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  18. 18

    Goldberg R, LaBelle P, Zupkis R, Ronca P. Comparison of the effects of lovastatin and gemfibrozil on lipids and glucose control in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:16B-21B
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  19. 19

    Itskovitz HD, Flamenbaum W, DeGaetano C, Pritchard KA Jr, Stemerman MB. Effect of lovastatin on serum lipids in patients with nonfamilial primary hypercholesterolemia. Clin Ther 1989;11:862-872
    Web of Science | Medline

  20. 20

    Kannel WB, D'Agostino RB, Stepanians M, D'Agostino LC. Efficacy and tolerability of lovastatin in a six-month study: analysis by gender, age and hypertensive status. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:1B-10B
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  21. 21

    Knopp RH, Ginsberg J, Albers JJ, et al. Contrasting effects of unmodified and time-release forms of niacin on lipoproteins in hyperlipidemic subjects: clues to mechanism of action of niacin. Metabolism 1985;34:642-650
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  22. 22

    Koskinen P, Kovanen PT, Tuomilehto J, Manninen V. Gemfibrozil also corrects dyslipidemia in postmenopausal women and smokers. Arch Intern Med 1992;152:90-96
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  23. 23

    Kundu SC, Roxy S, Batabyal SK. Gemfibrozil in dyslipidaemia. J Assoc Physicians India 1990;38:156-159
    Medline

  24. 24

    Luria MH. Effect of low-dose niacin on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2493-2495
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  25. 25

    Olsson AG, Rossner S, Walldius G, Carlson LA. Effect of gemfibrozil on lipoprotein concentrations in different types of hyperlipoproteinaemia. Proc R Soc Med 1976;69:Suppl 2:29-31

  26. 26

    Comparative efficacy and safety of pravastatin and cholestyramine alone and combined in patients with hypercholesterolemia: Pravastatin Multicenter Study Group II. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:1321-1329
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  27. 27

    Ryan JR, Jain AK, McMahon FG. Long-term treatment of hypercholesterolemia with colestipol hydrochloride. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1975;17:83-87
    Web of Science | Medline

  28. 28

    Sahni R, Maniet AR, Voci G, Banka VS. Prevention of restenosis by lovastatin after successful coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1991;121:1600-1608
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  29. 29

    Varthakavi PK, Turakhia DP, Sharma SS, Salgaonkar DS, Nihalani KD, Joshi VR. Gemfibrozil in hyperlipidaemia: an open, single blind trial. J Assoc Physicians India 1990;38:136-140
    Medline

  30. 30

    Watts GF, Lewis B, Brunt JNH, et al. Effects on coronary artery disease of lipid-lowering diet, or diet plus cholestyramine, in the St Thomas' Atherosclerosis Regression Study (STARS). Lancet 1992;339:563-569
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  31. 31

    Yovos JG, Patel ST, Falko JM, Newman HAI, Hill DS. Effects of nicotinic acid therapy on plasma lipoproteins and very low density lipoprotein apoprotein C subspecies in hyperlipoproteinemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1982;54:1210-1215
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  32. 32

    Thurmer HL, Lund-Larsen PG, Tverdal A. Is blood pressure treatment as effective in a population setting as in controlled trials? Results from a prospective study. J Hypertens 1994;12:481-490
    Web of Science | Medline

  33. 33

    Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Gibson ES, et al. Improvement of medication compliance in uncontrolled hypertension. Lancet 1976;1:1265-1268
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  34. 34

    Gallup G Jr, Cotugno HE. Preferences and practices of Americans and their physicians in antihypertensive therapy. Am J Med 1986;81:Suppl 6C:20-24
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  35. 35

    Inui TS, Carter WB, Pecoraro RE, Pearlman RA, Dohan JJ. Variations in patient compliance with common long-term drugs. Med Care 1980;18:986-993
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  36. 36

    German PS. Compliance and chronic disease. Hypertension 1988;11:Suppl 2:II-56

  37. 37

    MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results: Medical Research Council Working Party. BMJ 1985;291:97-104
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  38. 38

    Curb JD, Borhani NO, Blaszkowski TP, Zimbaldi N, Fotiu S, Williams W. Long-term surveillance for adverse effects of antihypertensive drugs. JAMA 1985;253:3263-3268
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  39. 39

    Caldwell JR, Cobb S, Dowling MD, de Jongh D. The dropout problem in antihypertensive treatment: a pilot study of social and emotional factors influencing a patient's ability to follow antihypertensive treatment. J Chronic Dis 1970;22:579-592
    CrossRef | Medline

  40. 40

    Gillum RF, Neutra RR, Stason WB, Solomon HS. Determinants of dropout rate among hypertensive patients in an urban clinic. J Community Health 1979;5:94-100
    CrossRef | Medline

  41. 41

    Engelland AL, Alderman MH, Powell HB. Blood pressure control in private practice: a case report. Am J Public Health 1979;69:25-29
    Web of Science | Medline

  42. 42

    Schectman G, Hiatt J, Hartz A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy (bile acid sequestrants, niacin, psyllium and lovastatin) for treating hypercholesterolemia in veterans. Am J Cardiol 1993;71:759-765
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  43. 43

    Wirebaugh SR, Whitney EJ. Compliance of four lipid lowering agents at one year in a preventive cardiology clinic. Pharmacotherapy 1992;12:263-263 abstract.

  44. 44

    Wirebaugh SR, Whitney EJ. Long-term compliance with lipid-lowering therapy. Pharmacol Ther 1993;18:559-571

  45. 45

    Oster G, Epstein AM. Cost-effectiveness of antihyperlipemic therapy in the prevention of coronary heart disease: the case of cholestyramine. JAMA 1987;258:2381-2387
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

  46. 46

    Schulman KA, Kinosian B, Jacobson TA, et al. Reducing high blood cholesterol level with drugs: cost-effectiveness of pharmacologic management. JAMA 1990;264:3025-3033
    CrossRef | Web of Science | Medline

Citing Articles (141)

Citing Articles

  1. 1

    Richard H. Tytus, Linda Assouline, Anita Vanjaka. (2011) Blood pressure control rates with an antihypertensive regimen including trandolapril in a canadian usual-care setting. Advances in Therapy 28:9, 789-798
    CrossRef

  2. 2

    Matilda Florentin, Evangelos N Liberopoulos, Dimitri P Mikhailidis, Moses S Elisaf. (2011) Emerging options in the treatment of dyslipidemias: a bright future?. Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs 16:2, 247-270
    CrossRef

  3. 3

    Howard S. Friedman, Srinivasan Rajagopalan, Jaime P. Barnes, Hal Roseman. (2011) Combination Therapy With Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Versus Statin Monotherapy for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction and Goal Attainment in a Real-World Clinical Setting. Clinical Therapeutics 33:2, 212-224
    CrossRef

  4. 4

    Cheol Whan Lee, Sang-Hong Baek, Taek-Jong Hong, Young-Jin Choi, Young-Jo Kim, Tae-Hoon Ahn, Sang-Hyun Ihm, Jang-Ho Bae, Soon-Jun Hong, Doo-Il Kim, Young-Keun Ahn, Seung-Ho Hur, Dae-Gyun Park, Dong-Ju Choi, Seung-Uk Lee, Bum-Soo Kim, Kyu-Hyung Ryu, Yang-Soo Jang, Sang-Hoon Lee, Ki-Bae Seung, Hyo-Soo Kim. (2010) A Multicenter, Eight-Week Treatment, Single-Step Titration, Open-Label Study Assessing the Percentage of Korean Dyslipidemic Patients Achieving LDL Cholesterol Target with Atorvastatin Starting Doses of 10 mg, 20 mg and 40 mg. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 24:2, 181-188
    CrossRef

  5. 5

    Nishma Manek. (2010) Missed opportunities for osteoporosis management in older patients: a literature review. Primary Health Care Research & Development 11:02, 155
    CrossRef

  6. 6

    David C. Chan, William H. Shrank, David Cutler, Saira Jan, Michael A. Fischer, Jun Liu, Jerry Avorn, Daniel Solomon, M Alan Brookhart, Niteesh K. Choudhry. (2010) Patient, Physician, and Payment Predictors of Statin Adherence. Medical Care 48:3, 196-202
    CrossRef

  7. 7

    Željko Reiner. (2010) Combined therapy in the treatment of dyslipidemia. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology 24:1, 19-28
    CrossRef

  8. 8

    Sung Ja Cho, Young Sik Kim, Ho Cheol Shin, Eun Ju Sung, Dae Hyun Kim, Sangyeoup Lee, Tae Hee Jeon, Yun Jun Yang, Chung Hwan Cho, Hee-Cheol Kang, Yoo Seock Cheong. (2010) A Randomized Controlled Trial of SMS Text Messaging versus Postal Reminder to Improve Attendance after Lipid Lowering Therapy in Primary Care. Korean Journal of Family Medicine 31:4, 284
    CrossRef

  9. 9

    Yunsheng Ma, Ira S. Ockene, Milagros C. Rosal, Philip A. Merriam, Judith K. Ockene, Pritesh J. Gandhi. (2010) Randomized Trial of a Pharmacist-Delivered Intervention for Improving Lipid-Lowering Medication Adherence among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. Cholesterol 2010, 1-11
    CrossRef

  10. 10

    A de la Sierra. (2009) Mitigation of calcium channel blocker-related oedema in hypertension by antagonists of the renin–angiotensin system. Journal of Human Hypertension 23:8, 503-511
    CrossRef

  11. 11

    Steen Husted. (2009) Evidence-based prescribing and adherence to antiplatelet therapy—How much difference do they make to patients with atherothrombosis?. International Journal of Cardiology 134:2, 150-159
    CrossRef

  12. 12

    Stefan N. Willich, Heike Englert, Frank Sonntag, Heinz Völler, Wolfgang Meyer-Sabellek, Karl Wegscheider, Eberhard Windler, Hugo Katus, Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn. (2009) Impact of a compliance program on cholesterol control: results of the randomized ORBITAL study in 8108 patients treated with rosuvastatin. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation 16:2, 180-187
    CrossRef

  13. 13

    Alberico L. Catapano. (2009) Perspectives on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement. Current Medical Research and Opinion 25:2, 431-447
    CrossRef

  14. 14

    A. Corsini, E. Windier, M. Farnier. (2009) Colesevelam hydrochloride: usefulness of a specifically engineered bile acid sequestrant for lowering LDL-cholesterol. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation 16:1, 1-9
    CrossRef

  15. 15

    Evangelos N Liberopoulos, Matilda Florentin, Dimitri P Mikhailidis, Moses S Elisaf. (2008) Compliance with lipid-lowering therapy and its impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 7:6, 717-725
    CrossRef

  16. 16

    L. A. Donnelly, A. S. F. Doney, A. D. Morris, C. N. A. Palmer, P. T. Donnan. (2008) Long-term adherence to statin treatment in diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 25:7, 850-855
    CrossRef

  17. 17

    J. F. Paolini, Y. B. Mitchel, R. Reyes, S. Thompson-Bell, Q. Yu, E. Lai, D. J. Watson, J. M. Norquist, C. McCrary Sisk, H. E. Bays. (2008) Measuring flushing symptoms with extended-release niacin using the flushing symptom questionnaire©: results from a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial. International Journal of Clinical Practice 62:6, 896-904
    CrossRef

  18. 18

    Terry A. Jacobson. (2008) Toward “Pain-Free” Statin Prescribing: Clinical Algorithm for Diagnosis and Management of Myalgia. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 83:6, 687-700
    CrossRef

  19. 19

    T. A. Jacobson. (2008) Toward 'Pain-Free' Statin Prescribing: Clinical Algorithm for Diagnosis and Management of Myalgia. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 83:6, 687-700
    CrossRef

  20. 20

    Andrew Peng Yu, Yanni F. Yu, Michael B. Nichol, Femida Gwadry-Sridhar. (2008) Delay in filling the initial prescription for a statin: A potential early indicator of medication nonpersistence. Clinical Therapeutics 30:4, 761-774
    CrossRef

  21. 21

    M. Florentin, E. N. Liberopoulos, D. P. Mikhailidis, M. S. Elisaf. (2008) Colesevelam hydrochloride in clinical practice: a new approach in the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. Current Medical Research and Opinion 24:4, 995-1009
    CrossRef

  22. 22

    Kenneth K.C. Lee, Vivian W.Y. Lee, Wai Kwong Chan, Benjamin S.C. Lee, Agnes C.Y. Chong, Jasper C.L. Wong, Don Yin, Evo Alemao, Brian Tomlinson. (2008) Cholesterol Goal Attainment in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Elevated Coronary Risk: Results of the Hong Kong Hospital Audit Study. Value in Health 11, S91-S98
    CrossRef

  23. 23

    Min-Kyung Kim, Hack-Lyoung Kim, Hee-Suk Min, Min-Seok Kim, Yeonyee Elizabeth Yoon, Kyoung-Woo Park, Sang-Hyun Kim, Joo-Hee Zo, Myung-A Kim, Hyun-Jong Moon, Hyo-Soo Kim, Dae-Won Sohn, Byung-Hee Oh, Young-Bae Park, Yun-Sik Choi. (2008) Changes of the Lipoprotein Profiles with Time after Discontinuation of Statin Therapy. Korean Circulation Journal 38:1, 36
    CrossRef

  24. 24

    Karim El Harchaoui, Fatima Akdim, Erik S G Stroes, Mieke D Trip, John J P Kastelein. (2008) Current and Future Pharmacologic Options for the Management of Patients Unable to Achieve Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Goals with Statins. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 8:4, 233-242
    CrossRef

  25. 25

    Boris LG van Wijk, William H Shrank, Olaf H Klungel, Sebastian Schneeweiss, M Alan Brookhart, Jerry Avorn. (2008) A cross-national study of the persistence of antihypertensive medication use in the elderly. Journal of Hypertension 26:1, 145-153
    CrossRef

  26. 26

    Becky A. Briesacher, M. Rhona Limcangco, Feride Frech-Tamas. (2007) New-User Persistence With Antihypertensives and Prescription Drug Cost-Sharing. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension 9:11, 831-836
    CrossRef

  27. 27

    Masayuki Kamatari, Shiro Koto, Nobuhiro Ozawa, Chie Urao, Yumiko Suzuki, Eri Akasaka, Kae Yanagimoto, Kazumi Sakota. (2007) Factors affecting long-term compliance of osteoporotic patients with bisphosphonate treatment and QOL assessment in actual practice: alendronate and risedronate. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 25:5, 302-309
    CrossRef

  28. 28

    Srinivasan Rajagopalan, Evo Alemao, Liz Finch, Don Yin. (2007) Impact of new Joint British Societies’ (JBS 2) guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease: evaluation of serum total cholesterol goal achievement in UK clinical practice*. Current Medical Research and Opinion 23:8, 2027-2034
    CrossRef

  29. 29

    Peter P. Toth. (2007) Making a Case for Quantitative Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 1:4, 234-241
    CrossRef

  30. 30

    Thomas I. Barron, Róisín Connolly, Kathleen Bennett, John Feely, M. John Kennedy. (2007) Early discontinuation of tamoxifen. Cancer 109:5, 832-839
    CrossRef

  31. 31

    Elisabetta Poluzzi, Petar Strahinja, Alberto Vaccheri, Antonio Vargiu, Maria Chiara Silvani, Domenico Motola, Giulio Marchesini, Fabrizio De Ponti, Nicola Montanaro. (2007) Adherence to chronic cardiovascular therapies: persistence over the years and dose coverage. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 63:3, 346-355
    CrossRef

  32. 32

    Annika Bardel, Mari-Ann Wallander, Kurt Svärdsudd. (2007) Factors associated with adherence to drug therapy: a population-based study. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 63:3, 307-314
    CrossRef

  33. 33

    Sachin J. Kamal-Bahl, Thomas Burke, Douglas Watson, Chuck Wentworth. (2007) Discontinuation of Lipid Modifying Drugs Among Commercially Insured United States Patients in Recent Clinical Practice. The American Journal of Cardiology 99:4, 530-534
    CrossRef

  34. 34

    Marie Hudson, Elham Rahme, Hugues Richard, Louise Pilote. (2007) Comparison of measures of medication persistency using a prescription drug database. American Heart Journal 153:1, 59-65
    CrossRef

  35. 35

    Thomas I. Barron, Kathleen Bennett, John Feely. (2006) Impact of high dose statin trials on hospital prescribers. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 63:1, 65-72
    CrossRef

  36. 36

    Patricia A. Caetano, Jonathan M.C. Lam, Steven G. Morgan. (2006) Toward a standard definition and measurement of persistence with drug therapy: Examples from research on statin and antihypertensive utilization. Clinical Therapeutics 28:9, 1411-1424
    CrossRef

  37. 37

    Anders G. Olsson. (2006) Are lower levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol beneficial? A review of recent data. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 8:5, 382-389
    CrossRef

  38. 38

    Jacques LeLorier. (2006) Treatment of dyslipidemia: We don’t know all we think we know. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 22:9, 737-738
    CrossRef

  39. 39

    Annemarie Armani, Peter P Toth. (2006) Colesevelam hydrochloride in the management of dyslipidemia. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 4:3, 283-291
    CrossRef

  40. 40

    Eric S. Johnson. (2006) Pharmacy databases can identify waste. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 15:3, 207-209
    CrossRef

  41. 41

    William Insull. (2006) Clinical Utility of Bile Acid Sequestrants in the Treatment of Dyslipidemia: A Scientific Review. Southern Medical Journal 99:3, 257-273
    CrossRef

  42. 42

    Sharath S. Hegde. (2006) Muscarinic receptors in the bladder: from basic research to therapeutics. British Journal of Pharmacology 147:S2, S80-S87
    CrossRef

  43. 43

    Héloise Cardinal, Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared, Marc Dorais, Jacques LeLorier. (2006) The concept of the ‘percent wasted patients’ in preventive health strategies. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 15:1, 57-61
    CrossRef

  44. 44

    A. A. Petrilla, J. S. Benner, D. S. Battleman, J. C. Tierce, E. H. Hazard. (2005) Evidence-based interventions to improve patient compliance with antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medications. International Journal of Clinical Practice 59:12, 1441-1451
    CrossRef

  45. 45

    Katherine A. Grosset, John L. Reid, Donald G. Grosset. (2005) Medicine-taking behavior: Implications of suboptimal compliance in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders 20:11, 1397-1404
    CrossRef

  46. 46

    Sylvie Perreault, Lucie Blais, Alice Dragomir, Marie-Hèlène Bouchard, Lyne Lalonde, Claudine Laurier, Johanne Collin. (2005) Persistence and determinants of statin therapy among middle-aged patients free of cardiovascular disease. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 61:9, 667-674
    CrossRef

  47. 47

    Herve Caspard, Arnold K. Chan, Alexander M. Walker. (2005) Compliance with a statin treatment in a usual-care setting:Retrospective database analysis over 3 years after treatment initiation in health maintenance organization enrollees with dyslipidemia. Clinical Therapeutics 27:10, 1639-1646
    CrossRef

  48. 48

    David F. Blackburn, Roy T. Dobson, James L. Blackburn, Thomas W. Wilson. (2005) Cardiovascular Morbidity Associated with Nonadherence to Statin Therapy. Pharmacotherapy 25:8, 1035-1043
    CrossRef

  49. 49

    J. M. Donovan, K. Von Bergmann, K. D. R. Setchell, J. Isaacsohn, A. S. Pappu, D. R. Illingworth, T. Olson, S. K. Burke. (2005) Effects of Colesevelam HCl on Sterol and Bile Acid Excretion in Patients with Type IIa Hypercholesterolemia. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 50:7, 1232-1238
    CrossRef

  50. 50

    Yanni F. Yu, Michael B. Nichol, Andrew P. Yu, Jeonghoon Ahn. (2005) Persistence and Adherence of Medications for Chronic Overactive Bladder/Urinary Incontinence in the California Medicaid Program. Value in Health 8:4, 495-505
    CrossRef

  51. 51

    S. Perreault, L. Blais, D. Lamarre, A. Dragomir, D. Berbiche, L. Lalonde, C. Laurier, F. St-Maurice, J. Collin. (2005) Persistence and determinants of statin therapy among middle-aged patients for primary and secondary prevention. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 59:5, 564-573
    CrossRef

  52. 52

    Mirko Martino, Luca Degli Esposti, Pierfrancesco Ruffo, Silvia Bustacchini, Alessandro Catte, Alessandra Sturani, Ezio Degli Esposti. (2005) Underuse of lipid-lowering drugs and factors associated with poor adherence: a real practice analysis in Italy. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 61:3, 225-230
    CrossRef

  53. 53

    James M Backes, Cheryl A Gibson, Patricia A Howard. (2005) Optimal lipid modification: the rationale for combination therapy. Vascular Health and Risk Management 1:4, 317-331
    CrossRef

  54. 54

    Karen L. Steinmetz, Kristine S. Schonder. (2005) Colesevelam: Potential Uses for the Newest Bile Resin. Cardiovascular Drug Reviews 23:1, 15-30
    CrossRef

  55. 55

    Michelle A. Huser, Tamara S. Evans, Val Berger. (2005) Medication adherence trends with statins. Advances in Therapy 22:2, 163-171
    CrossRef

  56. 56

    Andrew M Peterson, William F McGhan. (2005) Pharmacoeconomic Impact of Non-Compliance with Statins. PharmacoEconomics 23:1, 13-25
    CrossRef

  57. 57

    Peter M Rothwell. (2005) External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”. The Lancet 365:9453, 82-93
    CrossRef

  58. 58

    Margarite J Vale, Michael V Jelinek, James D Best. (2005) Impact of Coaching Patients on Coronary Risk Factors. Disease Management & Health Outcomes 13:4, 225-244
    CrossRef

  59. 59

    Dong-Churl Suh, Simu K Thomas, Elmira Valiyeva, Stephen Arcona, Lien Vo. (2005) Drug Persistency of Two Cholinesterase Inhibitors. Drugs & Aging 22:8, 695-707
    CrossRef

  60. 60

    Daniel E. Hilleman, Michele A. Faulkner, Michael S. Monaghan. (2004) Cost of a Pharmacist-Directed Intervention to Increase Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia. Pharmacotherapy 24:8, 1077-1083
    CrossRef

  61. 61

    Jeffrey J. Ellis, Steven R. Erickson, James G. Stevenson, Steven J. Bernstein, Renee A. Stiles, A. Mark Fendrick. (2004) Suboptimal Statin Adherence and Discontinuation in Primary and Secondary Prevention Populations. Should We Target Patients with the Most to Gain?. Journal of General Internal Medicine 19:6, 638-645
    CrossRef

  62. 62

    Krista A Payne, J Jaime Caro. (2004) Evaluating the true cost of hypertension management: evidence from actual practice. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 4:2, 179-187
    CrossRef

  63. 63

    G. M. Peterson, K. D. Fitzmaurice, M. Naunton, J. H. Vial, K. Stewart, H. Krum. (2004) Impact of pharmacist-conducted home visits on the outcomes of lipid-lowering drug therapy. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 29:1, 23-30
    CrossRef

  64. 64

    Walter F. Riesen, Roger Darioli, Georg Noll. (2004) Lipid-lowering therapy: strategies for improving compliance. Current Medical Research and Opinion 20:2, 165-173
    CrossRef

  65. 65

    Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse, Olaf H Klungel, Toine C G Egberts, W M Monique Verschuren, Arijan J Porsius, Anthonius de Boer. (2004) Failure to Continue Lipid-Lowering Drug Use Following the Withdrawal of Cerivastatin. Drug Safety 27:1, 63-70
    CrossRef

  66. 66

    Jaime J Caro, Norman Hollenberg, Joseph D Jackson, Krista A Payne, Gil L???Italien. (2004) Caring for Hypertension on Initiation: Costs and Effectiveness (CHOICE). Disease Management & Health Outcomes 12:5, 327-336
    CrossRef

  67. 67

    Kathleen A. Foley, Joseph Vasey, Charles M. Alexander, Leona E. Markson. (2003) Development and Validation of the Hyperlipidemia. Attitudes and Beliefs in Treatment (HABIT) Survey for Physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine 18:12, 984-990
    CrossRef

  68. 68

    Chen-Chang Yang, Susan S. Jick, Marcia A. Testa. (2003) Discontinuation and switching of therapy after initiation of lipid-lowering drugs: the effects of comorbidities and patient characteristics. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 56:1, 84-91
    CrossRef

  69. 69

    F. Depont, S. Rambelomanana, S. Le Puil, B. Begaud, H. Verdoux, N. Moore. (2003) Antidepressants: psychiatrists' opinions and clinical practice. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 108:1, 24-31
    CrossRef

  70. 70

    Susan E. Andrade, James G. Donahue, K. Arnold Chan, Douglas J. Watson, Richard Platt. (2003) Liver function testing in patients on HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 12:4, 307-313
    CrossRef

  71. 71

    Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der Zee, Bruno HCh Stricker, Olaf H Klungel, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse, John JP Kastelein, Albert Hofman, Hubertus GM Leufkens, Cornelia M van Duijn, Anthonius de Boer. (2003) Adherence to and dosing of ??-hydroxy-??-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in the general population differs according to apolipoprotein E-genotypes. Pharmacogenetics 13:4, 219-223
    CrossRef

  72. 72

    Chen-Chang Yang, Susan S. Jick, Marcia A. Testa. (2003) Who receives lipid-lowering drugs: the effects of comorbidities and patient characteristics on treatment initiation. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 55:3, 288-298
    CrossRef

  73. 73

    James A. Simon, Susan Wysocki, Jane Brandman, Kirsten Axelsen. (2003) A comparison of therapy continuation rates of different hormone replacement agents: a 9-month retrospective, longitudinal analysis of pharmacy claims among new users. Menopause 10:1, 37-44
    CrossRef

  74. 74

    Moti L. Kashyap, S. Tavintharan, Vaijinath S. Kamanna. (2003) Optimal Therapy of Low Levels of High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 3:1, 53-65
    CrossRef

  75. 75

    Andrew M. Peterson, Liza Takiya, Rebecca Finley. (2003) Meta-Analysis of Interventions To Improve Drug Adherence in Patients with Hyperlipidemia. Pharmacotherapy 23:1, 80-87
    CrossRef

  76. 76

    Young Sik Kim, Sung Sunwoo, Hye Ree Lee, Keun Mi Lee, Yong Woo Park, Ho Cheol Shin, Cheol Hwan Kim, Dae Hyun Kim, Byung Sung Kim, Hyeong Soo Cha, Bong Yul Huh, . (2002) Determinants of non-compliance with lipid-lowering therapy in hyperlipidemic patients. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 11:7, 593-600
    CrossRef

  77. 77

    W. Duvall, Michael Blazing, Shilpa Saxena, John Guyton. (2002) Journal of Cardiovascular Risk 9:6, 339-347
    CrossRef

  78. 78

    Theresa M. Bianco. 2002. Hyperlipidemia Pharmacy Practice. , 461-468.
    CrossRef

  79. 79

    Javed Butler, Patrick G Arbogast, Rhonda BeLue, James Daugherty, Manoj K Jain, Wayne A Ray, Marie R Griffin. (2002) Outpatient adherence to beta-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 40:9, 1589-1595
    CrossRef

  80. 80

    Dyfrig A Hughes. (2002) Economic impact of poor compliance with pharmaceuticals. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 2:4, 327-335
    CrossRef

  81. 81

    J. Ruof, G. Klein, W. März, H. Wollschläger, A. Neiss, M. Wehling. (2002) Lipid-Lowering Medication for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in a German Outpatient Population: The Gap Between Treatment Guidelines and Real Life Treatment Patterns. Preventive Medicine 35:1, 48-53
    CrossRef

  82. 82

    Anita Kärner, Anne Göransson, Björn Bergdahl. (2002) Conceptions on treatment and lifestyle in patients with coronary heart disease—a phenomenographic analysis. Patient Education and Counseling 47:2, 137-143
    CrossRef

  83. 83

    John Larsen, Morten Andersen, Jakob Kragstrup, Lars F. Gram. (2002) High persistence of statin use in a Danish population: Compliance study 1993-1998. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 53:4, 375-378
    CrossRef

  84. 84

    Gregg C. Fonarow. (2002) Statin therapy after acute myocardial infarction: Are we adequately treating high-risk patients?. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 4:2, 99-106
    CrossRef

  85. 85

    Catherine M. Roe, Michael J. Anderson, Barney Spivack. (2002) How Many Patients Complete an Adequate Trial of Donepezil?. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders 16:1, 49-51
    CrossRef

  86. 86

    Dimitri N. Kiortsis, Moses S. Elisaf. (2001) Serum uric acid levels: a useful but not absolute marker of compliance with fenofibrate treatment. Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology 15:6, 401-403
    CrossRef

  87. 87

    Aukje K. Mantel-Teeuwisse, Olaf H. Klungel, W.M.Monique Verschuren, Arijan Porsius, Anthonius de Boer. (2001) Comparison of different methods to estimate prevalence of drug use by using pharmacy records. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 54:11, 1181-1186
    CrossRef

  88. 88

    Dyfrig A. Hughes, Adrian Bagust, Alan Haycox, Tom Walley. (2001) The impact of non-compliance on the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceuticals: a review of the literature. Health Economics 10:7, 601-615
    CrossRef

  89. 89

    W Insull, P Toth, W Mullican, D Hunninghake, S Burke, J M Donovan, M H Davidson. (2001) Effectiveness of colesevelam hydrochloride in decreasing LDL cholesterol in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a 24-week randomized controlled trial.. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 76:10, 971-982
    CrossRef

  90. 90

    Sam Riahi, Kirsten Fonager, Egon Toft, Lars Hvilsted-Rasmussen, Jørgen Bendsen, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Henrik Toft Sørensen. (2001) Use of lipid-lowering drugs during 1991-98 in Northern Jutland, Denmark. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 52:3, 307-311
    CrossRef

  91. 91

    Kari L. Olson, Tammy J. Bungard, Ross T. Tsuyuki. (2001) Cholesterol Risk Management: A Systematic Examination of the Gap from Evidence to Practice. Pharmacotherapy 21:7, 807-817
    CrossRef

  92. 92

    Namsik Chung, Seung-Yun Cho, Dong-Hoon Choi, Jun-Ren Zhu, Kathy Lee, Pui-Yin Lee, Sang-Hoon Lee, Sahng Lee, Jiann-Jong Wang, Wei-Hsien Yin, Mason-Shing Young, Kwang-Kon Koh, Ji-Won Son, Somkiat Sangwatanaroj, Pradit Panchavinnin, Rewat Phankingthongkum, Nai-Sheng Cai, Wei-Fu Fan. (2001) STATT: a titrate-to-goal study of simvastatin in asian patients with coronary heart disease. Clinical Therapeutics 23:6, 858-870
    CrossRef

  93. 93

    Michael H. Davidson, Phillip Toth, Stuart Weiss, James Mckenney, Donald Hunninghake, Jonathan Isaacsohn, Joanne M. Donovan, Steven K. Burke. (2001) Low-dose combination therapy with colesevelam hydrochloride and lovastatin effectively decreases low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Clinical Cardiology 24:6, 467-474
    CrossRef

  94. 94

    Diane M. Becker, Jerilyn K. Allen. (2001) Improving Compliance in Your Dyslipidemic Patient: An Evidence-based Approach. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 13:5, 200-207
    CrossRef

  95. 95

    Ross T. Tsuyuki, Tammy J. Bungard. (2001) Poor Adherence with Hypolipidemic Drugs: A Lost Opportunity. Pharmacotherapy 21:5, 576-582
    CrossRef

  96. 96

    Dyfrig A. Hughes, Adrian Bagust, Alan Haycox, Tom Walley. (2001) Accounting for Noncompliance in Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations. PharmacoEconomics 19:12, 1185-1197
    CrossRef

  97. 97

    Brian Tomlinson, Paul Chan, Wei Lan. (2001) How Well Tolerated Are Lipid-Lowering Drugs?. Drugs & Aging 18:9, 665-683
    CrossRef

  98. 98

    John C. LaRosa. (2000) Poor compliance: The hidden risk factor. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 2:1, 1-4
    CrossRef

  99. 99

    D. N. Kiortsis, P. Giral, E. Bruckert, G. Turpin. (2000) Factors associated with low compliance with lipid-lowering drugs in hyperlipidemic patients. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 25:6, 445-451
    CrossRef

  100. 100

    Krista A. Payne, Sahra Esmonde-White. (2000) Observational studies of antihypertensive medication use and compliance: Is drug choice a factor in treatment adherence?. Current Hypertension Reports 2:6, 515-524
    CrossRef

  101. 101

    Michael H Davidson, Mary R Dicklin, Kevin C Maki, Ruth M Kleinpell. (2000) Colesevelam hydrochloride: a non-absorbed, polymeric cholesterol-lowering agent. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 9:11, 2663-2671
    CrossRef

  102. 102

    Antonio Petitta. (2000) Assessing the Value of Pharmacists' Health-Systemwide Services: Clinical Pathways and Treatment Guidelines. Pharmacotherapy 20:10 Part 2, 327S-332S
    CrossRef

  103. 103

    Ana P Suarez, Judy A Staffa, Peter Fletcher, Judith K Jones. (2000) Reason for discontinuation of newly prescribed antihypertensive medications: methods of a pilot study using computerized patient records. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 9:5, 405-416
    CrossRef

  104. 104

    David Siegel. (2000) The Gap Between Knowledge and Practice in the Treatment and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Preventive Cardiology 3:4, 167-171
    CrossRef

  105. 105

    Peter R. Jackson, Lawrence E. Ramsay. (2000) Debate: at what level of coronary heart disease risk should a statin be prescribed?. Current Opinion in Lipidology 11:4, 357-361
    CrossRef

  106. 106

    Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Mark A. Espeland, Gail A. Greendale, Jose Trabal, Susan Johnson, Claudine Legault, Donna Kritz-Silverstein, Paula Einhorn. (2000) Postmenopausal Hormone Use Following a 3-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine 9:6, 633-643
    CrossRef

  107. 107

    John Larsen, Alberto Vaccheri, Morten Andersen, Nicola Montanaro, Ulf Bergman. (2000) Lack of adherence to lipid-lowering drug treatment. A comparison of utilization patterns in defined populations in Funen, Denmark and Bologna, Italy. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 49:5, 463-471
    CrossRef

  108. 108

    E. Muls, G. De Bbacker, D. De Bacquer, M. Brohet, F. Heller. (2000) LIPI-WATCH, a Belgian/Luxembourg Survey on Achievement of European Atherosclerosis Society Lipid Goals. Clinical Drug Investigation 19:3, 219-229
    CrossRef

  109. 109

    Steven A Grover. (2000) Role of WHO-MONICA Project in unravelling of the cardiovascular puzzle. The Lancet 355:9205, 668-669
    CrossRef

  110. 110

    GEETA SIKAND, MOTI L KASHYAP, NATHAN D WONG, JEFFREY C HSU. (2000) Dietitian Intervention Improves Lipid Values and Saves Medication Costs in Men with Combined Hyperlipidemia and a History of Niacin Noncompliance. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 100:2, 218-224
    CrossRef

  111. 111

    Sidney C. Smith. (2000) PUTTING PREVENTION INTO DAILY PRACTICE. Medical Clinics of North America 84:1, 267-278
    CrossRef

  112. 112

    Fausto Garmendia, Alan S. Brown, Istvan Reiber, Philip C. Adams. (2000) Attaining United States and European Guideline LDL-cholesterol Levels with Simvastatin in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease (the GOALLS Study). Current Medical Research and Opinion 16:3, 208-219
    CrossRef

  113. 113

    Adalsteinn I.D. Brown, Alan M. Garber. (2000) A CONCISE REVIEW OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE PREVENTION. Medical Clinics of North America 84:1, 279-297
    CrossRef

  114. 114

    Sumit R. Majumdar, Jerry H. Gurwitz, Stephen B. Soumerai. (1999) Undertreatment of Hyperlipidemia in the Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of General Internal Medicine 14:12, 711-717
    CrossRef

  115. 115

    Susan E. Andrade, Gordon M. Saperia, Marc L. Berger, Richard Platt. (1999) Effectiveness of antihyperlipidemic drug management in clinical practice. Clinical Therapeutics 21:11, 1973-1987
    CrossRef

  116. 116

    Mary B. Pettinger, Myron A. Waclawiw, Kathryn B. Davis, Tracy E. Thomason, Rekha Garg, Beate Griffin, Debra A. Egan. (1999) Compliance to Multiple Interventions in a High Risk Population. Annals of Epidemiology 9:7, 408-418
    CrossRef

  117. 117

    John Feely. (1999) The therapeutic gap — compliance with medication and guidelines. Atherosclerosis 147, S31-S37
    CrossRef

  118. 118

    Frances B. Garfield, J. Jaime Caro. (1999) Postmarketing Studies: Benefits and Risks. Value in Health 2:4, 295-307
    CrossRef

  119. 119

    Kevin C. Farmer. (1999) Methods for measuring and monitoring medication regimen adherence in clinical trials and clinical practice. Clinical Therapeutics 21:6, 1074-1090
    CrossRef

  120. 120

    Thomas G. Allison, Ray W. Squires, Bruce D. Johnson, Gerald T. Gau. (1999) Achieving National Cholesterol Education Program Goals for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Cardiac Patients:Importance of Diet, Exercise, Weight Control, and Drug Therapy. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 74:5, 466-473
    CrossRef

  121. 121

    Thomas G. Allison, Ray W. Squires, Bruce D. Johnson, Gerald T. Gau. (1999) Achieving National Cholesterol Education Program Goals for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Cardiac Patients:Importance of Diet, Exercise, Weight Control, and Drug Therapy. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 74:5, 466-473
    CrossRef

  122. 122

    Achim Weizel. (1999) Therapie mit CSE-Hemmern — mehr als Lipidsenkung?. Herz 24:1, 42-50
    CrossRef

  123. 123

    Peter W. Beggs, David W.J. Clark, Sheila M. Williams, David M. Coulter. (1999) A comparison of the use, effectiveness and safety of bezafibrate, gemfibrozil and simvastatin in normal clinical practice using the New Zealand Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme (IMMP). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 47:1, 99-104
    CrossRef

  124. 124

    James M. McKenney. (1998) Patient Education and Compliance: How to Make It Cost-Effective. Value in Health 1:4, 212-215
    CrossRef

  125. 125

    Nkechi E. Azie, D. Craig Brater, Paula A. Becker, David R. Jones, Stephen D. Hall. (1998) The interaction of diltiazem with lovastatin and pravastatin*. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 64:4, 369-377
    CrossRef

  126. 126

    Susan Andrade. (1998) Compliance in the Real World. Value in Health 1:3, 171-173
    CrossRef

  127. 127

    Paul A. Fishman, Edward H. Wagner. (1998) MANAGED CARE DATA AND PUBLIC HEALTH: The Experience of Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. Annual Review of Public Health 19:1, 477-491
    CrossRef

  128. 128

    Daniel Eisenberg. (1998) The Importance of lowering cholesterol in patients with coronary heart disease. Clinical Cardiology 21:2, 81-84
    CrossRef

  129. 129

    Konrad Obermann, J.-Matthias Graf Schulenburg, Gisela C. Mautner. (1997) Ökonomische Analyse der Sekundärprävention der koronaren Herzkrankheit mit Simvastatin (Zocor®) in Deutschland. Medizinische Klinik 92:11, 686-694
    CrossRef

  130. 130

    N. Bradshaw, R. Walker. (1997) Prescription of statins: cost implications of evidence-based treatment applied to a health authority population. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 22:5-6, 379-389
    CrossRef

  131. 131

    Lora E. Burke, Jacqueline M. Dunbar-Jacob, Martha N. Hill. (1997) Compliance with cardiovascular disease prevention strategies: A review of the research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 19:3, 239-263
    CrossRef

  132. 132

    Thomas A. Pearson, William Feinberg. (1997) Behavioral issues in the efficacy versus effectiveness of pharmacologic agents in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 19:3, 230-238
    CrossRef

  133. 133

    Marshall E. Spearman, Kent Summers, Virginia Moore, Robert Jacqmin, Gary Smith, Susan Groshen. (1997) Cost-effectiveness of initial therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors to treat hypercholesterolemia in a primary care setting of a managed-care organization. Clinical Therapeutics 19:3, 582-602
    CrossRef

  134. 134

    Brenda R. Motheral, Kathleen A. Fairman. (1997) The use of claims databases for outcomes research: rationale, challenges, and strategies. Clinical Therapeutics 19:2, 346-366
    CrossRef

  135. 135

    David C. McGiffin, David C. Naftel, James K. Kirklin. (1997) PATIENT-SPECIFIC PREDICTIONS FOR CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING. ANZ Journal of Surgery 67:2-3, 108-114
    CrossRef

  136. 136

    Randall S. Stafford, David Blumenthal, Richard C. Pasternak. (1997) Variations in Cholesterol Management Practices of U.S. Physicians. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 29:1, 139-146
    CrossRef

  137. 137

    Gordon Schectman, Nancy Wolff, James C. Byrd, Janet G. Hiatt, Arthur Hartz. (1996) Physician extenders for cost-effective management of hypercholesterolemia. Journal of General Internal Medicine 11:5, 277-286
    CrossRef

  138. 138

    R. Fey, N. Pearson. (1996) Statins and coronary heart disease. The Lancet 347:9012, 1389-1390
    CrossRef

  139. 139

    LEON EISENBERG. (1996) What Should Doctors Do in the Face of Negative Evidence?. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 184:2, 103-105
    CrossRef

  140. 140

    I.U Haq, P.R Jackson, W.W Yeo, L.E Ramsay. (1995) Sheffield risk and treatment table for cholesterol lowering for primary prevention of coronary heart disease. The Lancet 346:8988, 1467-1471
    CrossRef

  141. 141

    (1995) Discontinuation of Antihyperlipidemic Drugs. New England Journal of Medicine 333:16, 1082-1083
    Full Text

Letters